Loading...
Adams Fairacre FarmsTOWN OF WAPPINGER PLANNING BOARD RECEIVED PROJECT NAME: Adam Fairacre Farms .Nov 0 3 zoos ACCOUNT NUMBER: 07-3135 TOWN CLERK MEETING DATE: November 3 , 2008 DATE PREPARED: October 31, 2008 DATE DUE: X SITE PLAN SPECIAL USE PERMIT SUBDIVISION THE ATTACHED HAS BEEN REFERRED TO YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT ANY COMMENTS TO THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER PLANNING BOARD, 20 MIDDLEBUSH ROAD, WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS. 1 TOWN FILE 7 TOWN OF WAPPINGER PLANNING BOARD _1_ ENGINEER TO THE TOWN ( Greg Bo1ner) _1_ PLANNER TO THE TOWN �1^ ATTORNEY TO THE TOWN HIGHWAY SUPERINTENDENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU RECREATION CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL DUTCHESS COUNTY DEPT. OF PLANNING DUTCHESS COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS _ _NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DUTCHESS COUNTY DEPT, OF HEALTH DUTCHESS COUNTY SOIL & WATER NYS DEPT OF D.E.0 TOWN OF EAST FISHKIIL VILLAGE OF WAPPINGER PLANNING BOARD —BUILDING INSPECTOR -GEORGE KOLB ZONING ADMINISTRATOR-TATIANA LUKIANOFF *************** PLEASE NOTE ANY VIOLATIONS UPON YOUR REVIEW*********** N I I Z 1 1140 10F.11 ilk' 2 9 5 MAIN STREET "()U0HE1; KI,SjVY -,NItW 07 545 g 4 5 ) 47.3-0200 Fax :(845) 473 - 0267 Letter of Transmittal Date: October 31, 2008 To: Ms. Barbara Roberti, Secretary Company: Planning Board of the ]'own of Wappinger Address: 20 Middlebush Road, Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 Job Name: Adarns — Wappingers Falls Job Number: Y0516 From: Robert Tulrner 9 Booklets Oct. 30., 2008 Submission Package for the Town of Wappinger Planning Board. Remarks: I am Providing to you the Submission Package For the Wappinger Falls Planning Board booklet, This is for the review of the EAF and the SEQRA Review, As stated by Dave Stolrnan, I needed to get copies of this documents to you and the other members of the Planning Board for the Project to be reviewed this Monday, Noveniber 3, 2008 at the Planning Board Meeting. Within the booklet is a written narrative and the EAF as well as the referenced exhibits. I will be sending submission packages direct]), to David Stolman, Greg Bolner and to Al Roberts to assist in expediting the review process. The other booklets for the Planning Board will be dropped off at the Town Hall later on Friday, November 31, 2008. Should there be any issues or questions, please call me. '"I'llank you, R. Turner CC: \\'I'a.,wj-w�cr\]'I,Jl3L]C"1'I'A.lobs',,YO5 16 - Adams Wappfi)gers FaHs\DoCLITnC11ts105 - 111anningn & ARoberts 300clobei-2008.doc Route 9 Town of Wapp nger, New York. TIr1IC.ELMAN aCHITECRM CIA POUGIMEEPSIE, NEW �iK (tv45) 473-C'200 October 30, 2008 TINUI ARCHITECTURE T. 2 95 MAIN STREET PGIIGH"rNIE, N£H' YORK (845)473-0200 Fax (845) 473 - 0267 Project Narrative - Adams Fairacre Farms Development: The Applicant, Adams Fairacre Farms, has been looking to expand their business in Dutchess County over the past several years. It was determine after evaluating numerous areas that southern part of the county was best suited as a location for a new store that would work well with the current three stores that are located in Poughkeepsie, Kingston and Newburgh. For this effort a Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), see Exhibit A, was completed to indicate the various impacts that will be created due to this Project. As indicated within the EAF, the impacts are of a small to moderate level in nature and will not have a significant impact on the environment and the surrounding community. A listing of the existing site conditions, the information on the Project and an evaluation of the Project impacts are as follows: Existinq Site Conditions: A. The site is located on the east side of Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, B. The site fronts both Route 9 and Old Post Road and is at the intersection of Route 9 and Fowler House Road and Old Post Road. C. The Project area encompasses a total of three existing parcels identified as grid numbers 135689-6157-04-649335, 135689-6157-04-614375 and 135689-6157-04- 649374. D. A small, surplus parcel of land along Route 9, which is currently owned by the Town of Wappinger, will also be acquired and become part of the Project site. E. The parcels identified in Items C and D, will be consolidated through a minor subdivision application to create a single parcel with a total Project area of 12.82 acres (558,655 sq.ft.). F. Zoning (see Sheet AZ -101) — a. The Project area is included two zoning districts: Highway Business (HB) & Highway Design (HD). b. The zoning of the adjoining properties to the east and south are R-20 Residential. c. The Retail, Greenhouse and Nursery uses are all accepted 'Permitted Principal Uses' and are compatible with the current Zoning Districts, G. Current Structures and Uses — a. A majority of the buildings within the Project area are residential structures; one main building exists on two of the parcels. The southern parcel has two main structures. Additional smaller storage buildings and garage structures also currently exist on the properties. b. A large automobile salvage and scrap yard exists on an adjacent parcel on the southwestern edge of the Project area, a portion of which has extended onto this site. c. The southern and eastern properties bordering the site are single family residential properties. d. A large automobile dealership borders the site on its northern boundary and a commercial office building is adjacent to the property on the southern border along Route 9. H. Vegetation and Soil Conditions - a. A Geotechnical Soil Investigation Report was prepared by Advance Testing Company, Inc. (see Exhibit B), to determine subsurface conditions. b. The main site consists of an `Upland Hardwood Forest' dominated by oaks, birch, ash, maple, cherry and hickory trees. c. Also found on the site are two wetland areas which are classified as 'Water Table Wetlands'. This is identified in the Wetland Functional Evaluation Report prepared by Ecological Solutions. (see Exhibit C), d. These consist of a small wetland in the north eastern corner of the site. This is an isolated wetland and is subject to the regulations established by the Town of Wappinger Wetland Ordinance. A larger wetland, located in the southern part of the site, is not isolated. This wetland drains through a culvert that passes under Route 9, connecting it to a wetland further to the west. This wetland is regulated by both the Town of Wappinger and the US Army Core of Engineers. e. The wetlands are located in the low depressions on the site. Within these wetland areas are a mixture of species of trees, whose dominate species are the sugar maples. f. The scrub and ground layer of the site consists of a large number of wild flowers, shrubs and other small plants. g. Occasional cobbles, boulders and rock outcroppings are present. h. Depth of the bedrock elevations varies as identifies in the Geotechnical Soil Investigation Report i. Depth of the ground water level varies as identified in the Geotechnical Soil Investigation Report j, Within the large wetlands exists a groundwater fed shallow pond. I. Environmental Studies — a. A Phase One Environmental Site Assessment was prepared by Conrad Geoscience Corporation (see Exhibit D). b. This assessment revealed that there was no `evidence of recognized environmental conditions' in connection to the property except for the following locations: • The area adjacent to the automobile savage yard contains a substantial amount of solid waste material; automotive debris, gas tanks, empty oil drums and other related waste material. • There exists on the northern and southern boundaries fill material sites consisting of both vegetative and man-made debris. J. Historical Investigations — a. A Phase One Archaeological Investigation was prepared by Tracker Archaeology Services Inc. for the determination of prehistoric and historic potential (see Exhibit E). L No prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered. c. This assessment determined that there is no further historical investigation necessary within the Project Area. 2. Project Information: A. The Building (see Sheets AZ -100 & 101) - a, The total building area to be developed will be 72,006 sq.ft. b. The area of the commercial building which will consist of a produce/grocery area and a garden center is 57,792 sq.ft. c. There will also be two greenhouse structures that will be attached to the building as well as other accessory structures, these are as follows: • A tropical greenhouse (3,200 sq.ft.). • A polyhouse (6,815 sq,ft.), A shade house (3,400 sq.ft.) that will accommodate the outdoor sale and display of seasonal bedding and garden plants and other seasonal & garden products. • An outdoor nursery and sales building (800 sq.ft.) for the sale of landscaping and nursery materials. • An outdoor nursery area of 46,175 sq.ft. will be created. B. Parking areas along with requisite loading areas, service roads and access drives will wrap around the building, thus avoiding the wetlands as much as possible. C. The customer parking will exist on the south and west sides of the building away from the residential areas. D. 342 spaces will be provided, which matches the parking count required by the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinances. E. The site will be landscaped and shall include such planting beds and shade trees throughout the parking lot to meet and exceed the requirements outline in the Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance and the Greenway Guidelines (see Sheets AZ -104 & 105). F. All paving areas, unless indicated on the Site Plan, are to be provided with concrete curbs. G. Two loading docks are being provided for the building, A request will be made to the Town of Wappinger to allow a reduction to the number of loading spaces that is specified by the Zoning Ordinance. H. To beautify the site as well as to visually conceal the parking lots from Route 9, stone walls are to be constructed along the western edge of the main parking lot. I. Retaining walls will be used to address the changes in elevation between the parking areas and the lower wetland areas. These walls will also assist in the physical separation of the stormwater systems and the wetlands. 3. Evaluation of Project Impacts & There Importance: A. Impact on Land — a. See Exhibits B & C. b. The locations on the site where the depth of the water table is less then 3 feet, occurs in the areas that are designated as the north and the south wetlands, these are known as Water Table Wetlands. The design of the site was focused around trying to impact the wetlands as minimally as possible, which in turn will have a small to moderate impact on the areas where the shallow table occurs. Those areas that that are impacted due to the development of the site will be mitigated on the property following the regulations established by the USACE and the Town of Wappinger. To create the mitigated wetlands a lower grade elevation will be established bringing it closer to the water table re-establishing the areas that were lost to development. c. In the development of the Project site, areas of shallow bedrock may be encountered. These areas will be removed through approved methods and the rock is to be crushed and reused on the site. The locations where bedrock is close to the grade elevation is indicated in the Geotechnical soil Investigation Report. In the development of the site, the evaluation of the depth of the bedrock was taken into consideration to keep the removal of bedrock to a minimum thus causing a small to moderate impact. B. Impact on Water - a. Wetlands (see Exhibits A, F & G and Sheets SP -104 thru 106) - b. Because part of the Project development occurs in the existing wetland areas, Ecological Solutions, LLC. analyzed the wetlands and developed a mitigation plan that meets both the regulations of the Town of Wappinger Wetland Ordinance and the United States Core of Engineers. As mentioned in Item 3(A), the design of the site was focused around trying to impact the wetlands as minimally as possible, which in turn will have a small to moderate impact on the areas. c. Mitigation ratio is one to one with no net loss of wetlands. d. Mitigation of the wetland buffer areas have been designed to include oversized water j quality basins, planting enhancements, bioswales and native landscaping. e. Monitoring of the new mitigated wetlands will be performed to verify their proper establishment and ongoing health. f, The proposed project will impact the 100' wetland buffer area as established by the Town of Wappinger. A majority of the buffer impact will occur in previously disturbed areas that have been used to store and dump debris. The site design will also include other important safeguards to the two wetland areas. g. As part of this development, there will be an increase in the area of impervious surface. This additional surface water run-off is to be collected in stormwater detentions structures included in the design. These consist of both an open detention basin as well as underground detention tanks. Ali are designed to contain and clean the water before gradually releasing it back on to the site or into existing drainage swales at a rate not to exceed the current conditions. h. Water Usage (see Exhibit H and Sheet SP -102) — • The anticipated average water usage is 20,000 to 25,000 g.p.d. (gallons per day). 5,000 g.p.d. are allocated for building usage. The remaining will be seasonal usage for irrigation purposes only and will vary as per the time of year and weather conditions. • A request has been provided to the Town of Wappinger for the allocation of 25,000 g.p.d. for this Project. This agreement is currently being drafted for final approval. • As part of this agreement, Adams Fairacre Farms has requested the Town of Wappinger to expand the Town's water district to include this Project. • The water trunk line that exists on the western side of Route 9 will be extended as part of this Project both to the south and east across Route 9, through the use of a directional bore, so as to provide a water line to the site. • The water trunk line will also be extended further south and shall be terminated on the north side of Fowler House Road, thus allowing for future expansion of the water district. i. Sewer Utilities (see Attachment N and Sheet SP -102) - • As part of this Project, the sewer lines that exist along Route 9 will be dropped in elevation and will extend south along the western edge of Route 9 and then under Route 9, again through the use of a directional bore, to provide sewer access to the Project site. • The sewer line will continue further south to be terminated on the north side of Fowler House Road. Again, this will allow for future expansion of the Town's sewer district. • A work agreement is being established bt the Town of Wappinger to allow for work within a Town controlled easement on the Friendly Acura Property. C. Impact on the Air — a. The impact on the air quality around the site will only be temporarily impacted during the construction period for the site and the building development. D. Impact on Plants and Animals - a. An Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Report (see Exhibit 1) was completed by Ecological Solutions, LLC, for a review of the existing habitat for the Indiana Bat and the Bog Turtle. No Bog Turtle habitat was observed on any portion of the site. b. The property is considered to possess a potential habitat for the Indiana Bat, Proper Site Development guidelines are to be followed when clear cutting the site for construction. c. A Mist Net Survey that was conducted on the property, from which the Summer Woodland Bat Survey (Exhibit J) was prepared. Within this document, the closest roost trees were identified. These locations have been indicated on Sheet ACOE 4 of 4 — Habitat Cover Type & Indiana Bat Roost Tree Location Map. There are no roost trees on the project site rendering a small impact regarding this matter. E, Impact on Transportation - a. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by John Collins Engineering, PC. (see Exhibit K, for Public Hearing Comments see Exhibits L and Sheets GN -1, CGD-1, CGD-2, TS -1, SP1 and SP -2). The improvements and traffic conditions associated with this Project will not significantly impact the current traffic conditions in a negative manner. b, A new traffic light shall be installed at the intersection of Fowler House Road, Old Post Road and Route 9. The NYSDOT has provided conceptual approval of this installation (see Exhibit M). c, New turning lanes will be added at this intersection to accommodate the deceleration and the waiting traffic. d. The entrance to Old Post Road will be widened and reconfigured to accommodate additional traffic lanes for turning, as per current safety standards. e. The main access and exit from the project site has been located at the north western edge of the property adjoining Old Post Road. This will allow for a sufficient stacking distance for vehicles entering or leaving the site. f. An additional entrance to the site is located between Route 9 and to the south of the entrance mentioned above to allow for cars to approach the site from Route 9 and immediately enter the site. A deceleration lane is also being created on the east side of Route 9 for traffic entering on to Old Route 9. g. Directional striping will be used to identify the newly created lanes of traffic and traffic flow. h. On-site signage and striping will be included throughout the site. i. On-site circulation for trucks has been accommodated and graphic identified on the Truck Turning Radius Plan. F. Noise and Odor Impacts a. The impact on the noise and odor quality around the site will only be temporarily impacted during the construction period for the site and the building development. G, Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood -- a. The affects of this Project on the density of the land use will cause a small to moderate impact due to the limitations to the development of the site that were encountered. b. With the proposed business, there will be a small to moderate increase in the demands of the police and the local fire departments as will the addition of any new business. 4. Neighbor's Concerns - A. Control of flooding on properties located north of the Project site is being addressed in conjunction with the design of the site engineering for this effort. An overflow pipe is to be placed at a predetermined elevation to control the maximum flood level of the northern wetland and thus reduce the flooding the currently occurs on neighboring properties. B. To reduce the visual impact of the business from the adjoining properties around the site's perimeter, there is to be established an evergreen landscaped buffer area in conjunction with a stockade fence. C. See Exhibit L for additional public comments that were presented during the Public Hearing that was concluded earlier this month. 5. Stormwater Management System: (see Exhibit M and Sheet SP102) - A. Post -construction stormwater management practices have been design for this Project to meet the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation pollutant removal goals, reduction of erosion and control and the prevention of flooding. B. A micropool extended detention pond is located in the south western area of the Property as part of the stormwater management system. C. This open and landscaped pond will accommodate the stormwater from the eastern and part of the southern portion of the site. The water is treated and then allowed to flow back into the southern wetland to match pre -development conditions D. Two stormwater management system that consists of underground detention structures are to be placed below the parking lot on the western side of the site. Both systems will treat and convey the stormwater to the north and south through an existing drainage swale that runs along Route 9. Drainage swale improvements will be conducted where required. E. Retaining walls have been used to transition between the parking areas and the wetlands. They will also assist in the stormwater management system by directing the stormwater away from the wetlands to the drainage system. 6. Visual Impact: A. The Design of the building's exterior will be in compliance with the established Adams Fairacre Farms corporate image that has been refined over the years as the other three stores have been constructed. B. This agrarian image will consist of the use of gable forms at the building entrances and smaller gables at other areas around the building. Low parapet walls will be used around the service areas of the building. r C. The building's exterior material will be of vertical board and batten siding and painted brick. Wood columns line the edges of large porches that flank the main entrances, Windows with divided lites will allow ample sunlight to enter the building interior. D. A combination of asphalt shingle and standing seam metal sloping roofs will be used. E. Preliminary south and west elevations have been provided for the Planning Board review see (sheet AZ -201). F. The elevations of the building will be further developed as the interior layout of the store is finalized. This submission contains a compilation of all current reports and documents that have been produced to date over the course of developing this Project. It provides a unified document for review by the Town of Wappinger Planning Board. With the submission of this document, the office of Tinkelman Architecture, PLLC is requesting the Town of Wappinger Planning Board place this Project on the Agenda for the November 3, 2008 Planning Board Meeting. w w � � U ft 0 4 0o ro 14-16-2 (9195)-7c SEQR 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question or significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data it assists a reviewer in the analyses that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range or possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 ❑ Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS Name of Action TOWN OF WAPPINGER PLANNING BOARD Name of Lead Agency Mr. Victor L. FAnuele Chairman, Town of Wappingers Planning tad Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signal a of R snonsibl Offi r in ad Agency 30 2)0 Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date October 30, 2008 3. What is predominate soil type(s) on project site? Dutchess Cardician a. Soil drainage: ❑ Well drained % of site ❑X Moderately well drained 100% of site ❑ Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? nla acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes 0 No a. What is depth to bedrock? 2' -- 12' based on the soil borings (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0 0 - 10% 89% 0 10 - 15% 4% 0 15% or greater 7% 6, Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑ Yes 0 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑ Yes 0 No B. What is the depth of the water table? 6' base on the soil borings. (in feet) at lowest point. (0' at wetlands surface) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [= Yes 0 No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? F, Yes 0 No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑ Yes 0 No According to Ecological Solutions, Inc. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑ Yes 0 No Describe 12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, explain 13. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑ Yes 0 No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NIA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Ponds 1 retention areas Size (in acres): 2.50 acre wetland areas 16. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 0 Yes ❑ No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes ❑ No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 0 Yes ❑ No Extension of water &sewer lines to serve site. 17. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 - AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑ Yes 0 No 18. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Oyes 0 No 19. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes 0 No B. Project Description 1, Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 12.82 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 10.62 acres c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2.20 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NIA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NIA %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 15; proposed 342. 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑ Yes X❑ No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? El Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s): Gas & Electricity 22, If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallonslminute. NIA 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 20.000 to 25,000 maximum gallons/day. (including irrigation) 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑ Yes X❑ No If yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: Town Board ❑X Yes ❑ No Town Planning Board 0 Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board 0 Yes ❑ No County Health Department ❑X Yes ❑ No Other Local Agencies 21 Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑ Yes 0 No State Agencies DYes ❑ No Federal Agencies 0 Yes ❑ No . Type Submittal Waterlsewer district expansion Date Road dedication/abandonment 712007 Site Plan: special permit; lot line revision & subdivision 4/2007- 120071012008 10/2008 Variance 912007-1012008 Water & Sewer 10/2008 D C Planning 239 1 & m review 412007 DOT HWR DEC SPDES 112008 LISACE NWP 1112007-1012008 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve planning or zoning decision? ❑X Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ zoning amendment 21 zoning variance ❑X special use permit 0 subdivision 0 site plan ❑ new/revision of master plan ❑ resource management plan ❑ other 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? HD I HB; Highway Design/Business Districts 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 25% coverage (HB strictest regulations) 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ❑X Yes ❑ No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a% mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin inglsurrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ❑X Yes ❑ No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NIA 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? FX -1 Yes ❑ No (extension of water & sewer district) 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Z Yes ❑ No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑X Yes ❑ No 12, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? 21 Yes ❑ No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? IK Yes ❑ No See traffic study. Traffic light proposed. 5 Part 2 — PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an Impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ❑ NO N YES Examples that would apply to column 2 "Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No foot or length), of where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. *Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less thanX❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 3 feet. *Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 0 ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 3 feet of existing ground surface. *Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No than one phase or stage. *Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No tons of natural material (i.e. rock or soil) per year. •Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No See Exhibits: Geotechnical Soil Investigation Report — Exhibit B & Wetland Functional Evaluation Report — Exhibit C. 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ❑X NO ❑ YES "Specific land forms: 11 11 ❑ Yes ❑ No 9 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change See Exhibit; Engineers Report — Water Distribution System & Sanitary Sewer System — Exhibit H. 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns or surface water runoff? ❑ NO FX1 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 *Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 'Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Proposed Action will allow development in designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •Other Impacts Proposed action will create additional imperviousX❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No area. See Exhibit: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan — Exhibit O. IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ❑ NO ❑X YES Examples that would apply to column 2 *Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No hour. *Proposed Action will result in the incineration or more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No refuse per hour. *Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. "Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount or land committed ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No to industrial use. *Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No development within existing industrial areas. *Other impacts: Temporary impact during construction. ❑X ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? X❑ NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 •Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. •Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No than for agricultural purposes. 'Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No See Exhibits: Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Report — Exhibit I & the Summer Woodland Bat Survey — Exhibit J. 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non -endangered species? El NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 •Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. *Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑ NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 •Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. 0 ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No See Exhibits: Traffic Impact Study -- Exhibit K & Additional Public Hearing Comments — Exhibit L. IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? 0 NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 *Proposed Action will cause greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No any form of energy in the municipality. •Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. *Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 111 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? 0 NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 •The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •A major reduction of an open space important to the community ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics Of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.15(8)? 0 NO ❑ YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 *Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 'Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No "Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No resource? •Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑ NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 •Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. 0 ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No •Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No *Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No See Exhibits: Traffic Impact Study -- Exhibit K & Additional Public Hearing Comments — Exhibit L. IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? 0 NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 *Proposed Action will cause greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No any form of energy in the municipality. •Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. *Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 111 •Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. •Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 0 No ❑ YES If Any Action in Part 2 is identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of impact, Proceed to Part 3 13 W a ( KEVIN L. PATTON, P.E. o1+F10E LOCATED AT . ADVANCE TESTING COMPANY, INC. 3348 ROUTE 208 ♦ CAMPBELL HALL, NY 10916 Phone 845 496-1600 Fax 845 496-1398 CLIENT: Tinkelman Architecture PROJECT: Adams Fairacre Farm PROJECT DESCRIPTION 295 Main Street Wappingers Falls, NY 4 Poughkeepsie, New York 12603 PROD. NO.: 070706 ATTN.: Mr. Robert Turner DATE: November 30, 2007 GEOTECHNICAL SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT Table of Contents Section Page 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 Boring Locations 4 2. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 6 2.1. Route 9 Utility Crossing 7 2.2. Parking Lot and Soil Areas 8 2.3. Building Area 11 2.4. Laboratory Testing 13 3. FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION 1.4 3. La. Allowable Bearing Capacity — Foundations on Soil 14 3.1.b. Allowable Bearing Capacity — Foundations on Rock 15 3.1.c. Foundations on Combinations of Rock and Soil 15 3.2. Adjacent Footing Loads 16 3.3. Differential and Total Settlement 16 4. FOUNDATION DRAINAGE AND SLAB BASE 17 5. ADDITIONAL DESIGN PARAMETERS 18 5.11 Seismic Design Factors 18 5.2. Earth Pressures 18 5.3. Liquefaction Potential and Slope Instability 19 5.4. Expansive Soils 19 6. CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 20 6.1. Soil Preparation, Fill and Compaction 20 6.2. OSHA Soil Classification 25 7. NOTES 25 SOIL BORING LOGS ROCK CORE LOGS LABORATORY REPORTS 1 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the construction of a new store building on a wooded site that appears to be previously undeveloped. The proposed structure will measure approximately 300 feet wide by 240 feet long, with an irregular footprint. The site is located east of Old Post Road, on the east side of US Route 9, about 2000 feet south of County Route 28, in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, NY (Figure 1). The property is at an elevation of approximately 230 to 260 feet, with the highest areas in the southeast corner and the center of the north side. There are two wetland areas on the site, one centered on the southeast quarter of the property, and one extending in from the northeast corner. Surficial geology on the property is identified as glacial till over very shallow bedrock, with lacustrine silts and clays (glacial lake deposits) to the south and east of the site. (Surficial Geologic Map of New York, Lower Hudson Sheet, Cadwell, 1989). Bedrock beneath the site is identified as graywacke and shale of the Cambrian Austin Glen Formation (Geologic Map of New York, Lower Hudson Sheet, Fisher, 1970). The USDA Soil Survey indicates that the soil in the project area (Figure 3) is Dutchess - Cardigan complex, which consists of about 40 percent Dutchess soils, 30 percent Cardigan soils, and 30 percent other soils and rock outcrops. Dutchess soils are typically well -drained loamy soils formed in till with a moderate permeability, with a soil depth of more than 7 feet. Cardigan soils are well -drained loamy soils formed in till with moderate permeability underlain by folded shale or slate bedrock at a depth of about 20 to 40 inches. These soils typically have a moderate potential for frost heave, low potential for corrosion of uncoated steel, and moderate to high potential for corrosion of concrete. The soils encountered at the site generally conformed to the soil survey descriptions. This geotechnical investigation was conducted to evaluate the engineering properties of the soils at the site, to aid in the design of the proposed work. The investigation did not include inspection of, or sampling for, items of environmental concern, such as the presence of soil contaminants or of regulated wetlands, and did not include review of local zoning regulations, codes, floodplain boundaries or similar matters, unless specifically referenced in the report. This investigation was conducted solely for the use of the Client; this report should not be used by others, nor for any use other than its stated purpose, without contacting the Engineer. Any such use is solely at the user's risk. 2 Figure 1: Adams Fairacre Farm Project Site Location Map �n ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 f 2. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION On November 12-14, 2007, twenty-one soil borings were drilled at the locations shown on the Site Plan (Figure 2). Soil borings were made using a drill rig and hollow -stem augers. Drilling was performed by General Borings, Inc., of Prospect, Connecticut. The soil borings were witnessed by Mr. Joseph Jacobs and Mr. Frank. Barrett,. of Advance Testing Company, Inc. Soil samples were recovered and soil blow count data was obtained in accordance with the Standard Method for Penetration Test and Split -Barrel Sampling of Soils, ASTM D1586. Soil bearing capacity can be computed from the Blow Counts ("N Values"), which are determined by driving the split -spoon sampling device into the soil with a 140 lb, hammer dropping 30 inches, and counting the number of blows required to advance it one foot. Blow count data is presented in the boring logs. Corrected blow counts are adjusted to the approximate corresponding values at an equivalent overburden stress of one ton per square foot for standard evaluation purposes. Borings were made to depths of approximately two to 12 feet with the soil auger, and three of the borings were cored into bedrock to depths of 12 to 19 feet. The soils encountered were glacial till, consisting mostly of silt, gravel and sand, with traces clay. In the low area near the south side of the site, the soil was mostly silty clay with sand. Occasional cobbles were encountered, and boulders may be present. Bedrock was encountered at depths of 2-12 feet below grade in all borings, and was also exposed in several outcrops. The rock is siltstone, sandstone and shale, that tends to be weathered and jointed in the upper few feet, becoming harder with increasing depth. A summary of the soil boring information is presented below. 6 2.1. Route 9 Utility Crossing 2.1.a. Soil Boring Blow Count Data 2.1.b. Subsurface Soil Profile B1 B2 B3 B4 Elevation WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Route 9 Roadway 234 Brown silty sand, little Approx. top of bedrock at South Borings \- gravel, few cobbles. 229 i - 224 Approximate top of bedrock at North Borings 7 Uncorrected Soil Blow Count Values, Corrected Soil Blow Count Values, Depth N N' (ft) B1 234 B2 234 B3 B4 Avg. 2341 B1 B2 B3 B4 Avg. Elev. 12 S 24 17 23 15 46 46 33 3 50/4"/6" n234234 11 100+ 14 19 16 6 33. 43 43 Refusal 4.5 3.0 4.5 5.5 ft 2.1.b. Subsurface Soil Profile B1 B2 B3 B4 Elevation WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Route 9 Roadway 234 Brown silty sand, little Approx. top of bedrock at South Borings \- gravel, few cobbles. 229 i - 224 Approximate top of bedrock at North Borings 7 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 2.2. Parking Lot and Soil Areas 2.2.a. Soil Boring Blow Count Data Uncorrected Soil Blow Count Values, N Depth (ft) BS B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B11 B12 B13 Avg. Elev. 241 240 244 253 235 236 249 239 253 243.3 1 16 8/6" 50/1" 50/5" 13 44 22 16 9 19 3 28 100+ 100+ 63 88 87 92/6" 72/6" 50/3" 68 6 100/3" 45 50/2" 50/0" 48 50/0" 47 11 54/5" 100+ Refusal, ft 6.5 4.0 2.5 2.0 12.0 6.0 5.0 8.0 5.0 5.7 ft Water Depth 6 ft 6 ft Corrected Soil Blow Count Values, N' Depth (ft)' B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 Bll B12 B13 Avg. 1 31 31 100+ 100+ 25 84 42 31 17 37 3 43 100+ 100+ 100+ 100+ 100+ 43 6 100+ 59 100+ 100+ 63 100+ 61 11 100+ 100+ W �o z w v 6 w 2.3. Building Area 2.3.a. Soil Boring Blow Count Data I 11 Uncorrected Soil Blow Count Values, N Depth (ft) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 Avg. Elev. 238 250 239 241 234 236 240 242 240 1 17 19/6" 4/6" 31 19 97 13 7 29 3 50/3" 24 53/6" 50/0" 24 6 50/2" 76 35 89 67 8 55 55 Cored Cored Cored Notes to 12' to 14' to 19' Refusal, 5.0 7.0 9.0 4.0 10.5 4.5 10.0 3.0 6.6 ft Water 6.5 Depth I 11 Corrected Soil Blow Count Values, N' Depth (ft) 1 Si 33 S2 73 S3S4 15 59 S5 S6 36 100+ S7 S8 25 13 Avg, 36 3 100+ 37 100+ 100+ 37 6 100+ 100 46 100+ 73 8 67 67 I 11 N II 2.4. Laboratory Testing Representative samples of soil were selected for testing in the Advance Testing Company laboratory. Test results were as follow. Natural Moisture Content, Percent Depth, B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B9 B12 B13 S1 S3 S5 S6 S7 S8 feet 1 21.2 11.6 15.9 12.4 14.2 3 12.9 14.3 14.0 9.3 7.8 14.0 7.8 9.7 6 9.7 13.5 10.8 7.2 8 16.7 10 6.7 Croon dnnlveiC Sample Number S5 S4 B4 S2 Depth (ft) 8 ft 8 ft 3 ft Sieve Size 25 Percent Passing by Weight mm in 19.0 3/a" 100, 66 4.75 #4 95 58 2.00 0.425 #10 #40 90 84 53 48 0.075 #200 65.4 38.0 Atterberg Limits Sample Number S5 S4 B4 S2 Depth, ft 8 ft 3 ft Liquid Limit 33 25 Plastic Limit 23 22 Plasticity Index I 10 1 3 The gradation and Atterberg Limits test results indicate that the soils underlying the site range from USCS Class CL, Lean Clay with Sand, to GM, Silty Gravel with Sand. The GM class soil is typical of most of the soils at the site. The CL class soil is found in some deeper soils and in the wetland areas in the southeast portion of the site. 13 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 3, FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION 3.1. Allowable Bearing Capacity Soil boring data and test results indicate the site is suitable for the use of conventional spread. footings and slab -on -grade construction. The investigation and the elevation data that was provided indicate that the. building foundation will bear on undisturbed soil, fill placed over undisturbed soil, and bedrock. The following values for Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity (qa) were determined. The allowable bearing capacity values provided below incorporate a Safety Factor of three against bearing capacity failure, and consideration has been made for any adverse influences that may be caused by fluctuations of the water table.. 3.1.a. Foundations on Soil Allowable Bearing Depth below Width; Capacity Footing type. grade, {ft)* (ft) lbs/ sq ft tons/ sq ft Continuous or Spread >3.5 1.0 to 2.4 4,000 2.00 (Standard) >2.5 4,500 2.25 Continuous or Spread 1.5 1.0 to 2.4 2,000 1.00 (Shallow) >2.5 3,000 1.50 *Minimum depth below surrounding soil or adjacent finished floor slab elevation. The bearing capacity values assume that the footings bear on undisturbed suitable soil or on compacted controlled Fill placed over suitable undisturbed soil. Minimum Footing Width on soil Continuous Footings: not less than 12 inches. Spread Footings: not less than 18 inches. Minimum Footing Depth on soil Footings subject to frost: 42 inches, unless otherwise protected. Footings not subject to frost: 18 inches. Footing areas shall be prepared as described in Section 6 of this report. 14 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 3.1.b. Foundations Bearing on Rock Foundations may bear on bedrock. The following values for Allowable Bearing Capacity (qa) were determined for this condition. Footings Bearing on Rock Depth below Allowable Bearing Capacit} Bearing Condition Width, ft grade, ft lbs/ sq ft tons/ sq ft otin,as on Sound Rock > 1.0 > 1.0 6,000 3.00 Continuous or spread footings bearing on sound rock shall not be less than 12 inches in width, and shall bear at least 12 inches below finished grade.. Sound rock consists of shale and siltstone that is free from weak or weathered zones and that cannot be excavated with hand -operated equipment. Footings bearing on weathered or soft rock shall be sized in accordance with the requirements for footings bearing on soil. Rock surfaces under footings shall be prepared as described in Section 6. 3.1.c. Foundations Bearing on Combinations of Rock and Soil In cases where footings bear on a combination of rock and soil, the corresponding soil bearing value given in Section 3.1.a shall be considered to be the allowable bearing capacity. Individual spread footings shall not bear on a combination of rock and soil without approval by the Engineer. Continuous footings shall not bear on soil and rock in combination across the width of the footing. When such conditions are encountered, the excavation shall be continued to sufficient depth to provide bearing completely on rock. Continuous footings may transition from rock to soil along the length of the footing, as described below. Where continuous footings bear on a combination of rock and soil, the rock shall be excavated to an elevation at least 6 inches below the bottom of the proposed footing for a distance of at least 10 feet beyond the end of the section bearing on soil. The surface of the over -excavated rock shall be covered with six inches of site borrow soil or Structural Fill, thoroughly compacted. Over -excavation of the. rock and replacement of the fill may be omitted when the footing excavation transitions gradually from soil to weathered 15 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 { rock to sound bedrock. For exterior continuous footings, the bottom elevation of the footings shall be below frost depth in the transition area. For interior continuous footings, the bottom elevation of the footing shall be at least 18 inches below grade in the transition area. 3.2. Adjacent Footing Loads Bearing elevations of footings shall be established such that a line drawn between the bottoms of two adjacent footings shall not be steeper than 30 degrees between the closest points on the footings. (Slope of 1 vertical to 1.75 horizontal.) Where continuous footings are stepped to change elevation, individual steps should not be greater than 4 feet in height and should not be spaced closer than 7 feet horizontally. 3.3. Differential and Total Settlement The soil evaluation and bearing capacity determinations made in this report have been developed using methods designed to limit maximum total settlement to one inch, and maximum differential settlement to 3/a -inch. Actual field performance is expected to be consistent with these values, provided that good construction practices are used. Careful preparation and inspection of foundation areas must be performed. The Engineer should be consulted if unusual conditions are encountered or if any questions arise as to the quality of the soil. 16 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY' NOVEMBER 30, 2007 4. FOUNDATION DRAINAGE AND SLAB BASE Foundation drains are required in any portions of the building where the floor slab elevation is below the adjacent exterior grade. Footing drains are recommended for the balance of the building perimeter to control seasonal high groundwater. In order to remove and control. groundwater, conventional footing drains are recommended. Drains should consist of 4 -inch diameter perforated pipe installed in gravel or crushed stone with not more than 10% passing the #4 (4.75mm) sieve. The top of the drain (gravel) shall be at least 6 inches above the top of the footing, and the bottom of the drain shall be at least 6 inches below the bottom of the floor slab. The drain shall extend at least 12 inches out from the outside edge of the foundation. A layer of geotextile filter fabric shall be placed between the crushed stone footing drains and the soil, to prevent migration of fines from the soil into the drains. A non -woven (felt type) filter fabric such as Mirafi 135N, or similar fabric with an apparent opening size (AOS) not greater than 0.3mm, should be used.. The pipe from the drains shall discharge via gravity or by pumping, to a storm sewer or other suitable approved location. Floor slabs in occupied areas shall be dampproofed; dampproofing is optional for mechanical rooms and similar areas. Slabs shall be provided at a minimum with a vapor barrier consisting of at least a 6 -mil minimum thickness polyethylene sheet lapped at least 6 inches at joints, or shall be dampproofed by other means, in conformance with section 1807.2.1 of the Building Code. A subbase layer consisting of at least a 4 -inch layer of stone or gravel with not more than 10% passing the #4 (4.75mm) sieve shall be provided under the vapor barrier, as required by Code. Blended 3/a3/s inch material, or 3/a -inch material, is recommended for the subbase layer. Walls of rooms below grade, where the groundwater level is maintained below the base of the walls, shall be dampproofed using materials and methods in conformance with the Building Code, section 1807.2.2. The above recommendations are intended to limit moisture transmission to the building interior areas, however these recommendations do not guarantee that problems related to soil moisture, such as interior mold growth and floor finish impacts will be prevented. Proper ventilation, surface drainage and construction practices are critical to the prevention of these problems. 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 l 5. ADDITIONAL DESIGN PARAMETERS 5,1 Qd-kmiv DeciQn Factors 5.2. Earth Pressures The following engineering coefficients were determined from the soil borings and examination of the samples. * Multiply by dead load to determine total friction force. **For horizontal backfill condition 18 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 5.3. Liquefaction Potential and Slope Instability The soils encountered in the investigation. have negligible liquefaction susceptibility. These soils will not tend to lose shear strength during anticipated seismic events. The proposed structure will be sufficiently separated from slopes such that no adverse conditions will exist. No special mitigation measures are required. S.A. Expansive Soils The soils encountered during the investigation have a negligible potential for expansion. Expansive soils are typically high -plasticity silts and clays (elastic silt and fat clay,) which were not present at the site. No mitigation measures are required.. 19 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS -- WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 6. CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES 6.1. Soil Preparation, Fill and Compaction SITE (GENERAL}: All pavement, debris, topsoil, loose, loamy subsoil or other similar materials shall be removed from building and pavement construction areas. Any existing permanent underground utilities shall be protected, relocated and/ or disabled as required. The proposed construction area should be thoroughly compacted and proof -rolled at the surface, using a single -drum vibratory roller weighing at least ten tons. Any soft or otherwise deficient areas should be repaired prior to beginning construction. Groundwater control may be required during foundation construction. The soil underlying the site consists predominately of silty gravel with sand. Conventional pumping of water seepage from excavations should be sufficient to control groundwater. Excavated soil should be selectively stockpiled based on quality, for potential reuse. BUILDING PAD: The building pad will require cut and fill work to attain the required elevation and profile. The following procedures are recommended. Cut Areas: Topsoil and unsuitable surface materials should be removed first and stockpiled separately for disposal. Native soil and rock below this layer may be reused as fill. Shallow bedrock is likely to be encountered in the cut areas; the rock consists of siltstone, sandstone and shale. The rock is hard, but is weathered and heavily jointed near the top. The information from the borings indicates that most rock removal should be possible using heavy ripping equipment; hydraulic hammers and/or blasting may be required for deeper parts of the rock. Fill Areas: Remove topsoil and other unsuitable materials. Remove or repair any soft or unstable areas prior to placing fill. Place fill in nearly horizontal layers, pitched to allow stormwater to drain. Refer to the information below for additional comments. 20 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 FOOTINGS: Footings should be excavated to the design bearing. elevation. Any old fill materials, organic material, large pieces of debris or similar deficient zones shall be removed and replaced with compacted controlled fill. Boulders shall be completely removed from under footing areas, and replaced with compacted controlled fill, or shall be partially removed to an elevation at least six inches below the bottom of the footing, with fill placed over the boulder and thoroughly compacted. After excavating for the footings, any material loosened by the excavation work shall be firmly consolidated by packing with the excavator bucket, or by compacting with a vibratory plate tamper, roller or by similar means. If the soil at the bearing elevation is wet, or may become wet prior to concrete placement, the footings should be over -excavated by approximately 6 inches, the bottom should be compacted, and a six-inch layer of gravel or crushed stone, 11/4 -inch or 3/4 -inch size, or 3/s -3/a inch blend, should be placed in the bottom of the footings, and. seated with at least two passes of a vibratory plate tamper or roller. This stone may be installed to protect the stability of the native soil, and to facilitate drainage of stormwater and groundwater seepage. A deeper sump pit should be provided at the end of footing trenches to collect water and allow it to be pumped out. Water shall be promptly removed from footing excavations, and the footings shall be free from frost, and substantially free from standing water when concrete is placed. SLABS -ON -GRADE: The slab area shall be thoroughly compacted and proof -rolled prior to placing the slab subbase layer. Any soft or unstable areas of soil, organic material, large pieces of debris or similar deficient zones shall be removed and replaced with compacted controlled fill. A vapor barrier and slab subbase shall be provided as described in Section 4 of this report. Concrete shall not be placed over frozen or unstable soil FILL AND BACKFILL. Soil excavated from the site, with particles larger than 6 inches in size removed, may be used as fill under footings and slabs, and as backfill for wails and trenches. 21 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS -- WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 Rock excavated from the site may be reused as fill, either as soil/ rock blend or as rock fill. Soil/ rock blend shall consist of broken rock that is essentially free from particles larger than b inches in size, blended with 25 to 75% soil; the blend proportions and texture of the soil and rock used in the blend should be kept consistent, for purposes of compaction control. Rock fill shall consist of broken rock that is essentially free from particles larger than 12 inches in size. The surface of the. rock fill shall be `choked' with finer material prior to placement of soil -based fills on top of it, to prevent migration of fine particles. Imported Structural Fill may be used in lieu of site borrow if required. Imported fill shall consist of sound, durable material, and should meet the gradation limits specified below. All fill materials shall be free from frost, garbage, construction debris or other deleterious material, and shall be substantially free from organic matter and roots. Fill shall not be placed over frozen or unstable soil, unless approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed and compacted at an appropriate moisture content; it is likely that site borrow soil will require drying prior to placement. Fill shall be compacted in lifts of a thickness appropriate for the compaction equipment used, and not more than twelve inches in compacted thickness. TRENCH BACKFILL: Unless otherwise recommended by the manufacturer, or required by Code or local authority, the following procedures shall be used to backfill trenches for new utility installations. 22 Structural Fill Sieve size mm inches percent Passing by Weight 100 4" 100 6.3 1/4" 25-75 0.425 #40 5-40 0.075. ##200 0-20 All fill materials shall be free from frost, garbage, construction debris or other deleterious material, and shall be substantially free from organic matter and roots. Fill shall not be placed over frozen or unstable soil, unless approved by the Engineer. Fill shall be placed and compacted at an appropriate moisture content; it is likely that site borrow soil will require drying prior to placement. Fill shall be compacted in lifts of a thickness appropriate for the compaction equipment used, and not more than twelve inches in compacted thickness. TRENCH BACKFILL: Unless otherwise recommended by the manufacturer, or required by Code or local authority, the following procedures shall be used to backfill trenches for new utility installations. 22 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 j Underground utilities shall be installed on appropriate bedding material (sand, clean fine stone, etc.) The bedding shall be compacted below and adjacent to the utility line. A one -foot bedding layer shall be provided above the utility line, and lightly compacted with a vibratory plate tamper. Backfill above this elevation shall consist of fill material, as described above, except than rock fill shall not be used as trench backfill. An initial one foot layer of fill shall be placed above the bedding layer, and compacted. Subsequent lifts of backfill shall not be greater than one foot in thickness, and may be reduced in thickness to obtain the required degree of compaction. COMPACTION: Vibratory rollers are recommended for compaction of site borrow material, soil/ rock blend or Structural Fill. Where access is restricted, jumping -jack type tampers should be used for compaction of site borrow soil, and vibratory plate tampers should be used for .compaction of Structural Fill, with the lift thickness reduced as required to achieve compaction. These fill materials shall be placed in lifts not greater than one foot in compacted thickness. Rock fill shall be placed in, a layer with a loose thickness of approximately 24 inches, and shall be moistened prior to and/ or during placement, such that the surfaces of the rock particles are wet. Placement of the layer shall be observed, to insure that the material is evenly distributed and is free from boulder pockets or excessively fine zones. The Rock fill shall be compacted using a single -drum vibratory tamping -foot (`sheep's foot') roller weighing at least 10 tons. Hand operated equipment shall not be used for compaction of rock fill, unless approved by the Engineer. Several vibratory passes shall be made, with half the passes made perpendicular to the others. Compaction of the fill shall be observed, to verify that the lift has been thoroughly compacted; a nuclear moisture -density gauge may be used to monitor the density at representative locations, to verify that the density of the fill has `peaked.' Fill shall be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method, ASTM D1557, in all areas under the footings and within the area extending out and down at a 45 degree angle from the bottom comers of the footings. 23 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30,20-07 Fill placed in areas under slabs shall be compacted to at least 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. Exterior foundation backfill that will not support stairs, pavement or other structures shall be compacted to at least 90% of the D1557 maximum; other exterior backfill shall be compacted to at least 95%. Trench backfill shall be compacted as follows: First one foot layer above bedding: Compact to at least 90% of D1557 maximum density. If 90% compaction cannot be achieved, compact to the maximum obtainable density, with the moisture content of the fill material within 2% of optimum. Subsequent layers: 95% under structures and pavements, 90% elsewhere. COMPACTION TESTING: Compaction tests shall be performed at representative locations in each lift of fill; with at least one test per 50 linear feet performed in continuous footings and trenches, one test per footing in spread footings, and one test per 5000 square feet (minimum three tests per lift) in slab areas, for each lift of fill_ Rock fill shall be visually monitored during placement and compaction. Compaction shall be considered acceptable if the lift has been properly installed, and the surface of the lift is firm and stable, and is essentially free from rocks that shift under the roller. The rock fill is.typically acceptable when the sheep's foot roller `walks up' out of the fill, such.that the feet of the drum ride on the surface of the rocks, and rocks begin to fracture under the roller. If a moisture -density gauge is used to monitor compaction, the density of the fill should not increase by more than one percent after two additional vibratory passes of the roller; compaction test results alone are not sufficient for acceptance of rock fill placement; visual monitoring during placement and compaction is required. 24 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY NOVEMBER 30, 2007 6.2. OSHA Soil Classification The soils encountered at the site are classified by the OSHA excavation regulations (29CFR 1926.650) as Type B. Sides of excavations less than 20 feet deep in Type B soils shall be sloped at less than 1:1 (1 horizontal to 1 vertical) or shall be protected by braced sheeting, trench boxes, or similar approved means. Vertical sides in the bottom of excavations shall be protected by shields or shoring extending at least 18 inches above the vertical portion of the excavation.. The above comments are intended to be used for general planning of excavation limits and work phasing. On-site inspection during construction is required to verify site conditions and select appropriate methods of protection. Please refer to the OSHA regulations for additional requirements. 7. NOTES Please see the attached pages for additional information. Soil conditions encountered during construction shall be compared to the soil boring logs and this report; any significant variations from anticipated conditions must be evaluated for their effect on the foundation design. While soil borings, which were a key part of this evaluation, are an important investigative tool, they cannot detect every variation in complex natural soil deposits or fills. GI. Prepared by Kevin L. Patton, P.E. 25 CLIENT:' General Borings, Inc. Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMANIDRILLER: Richard Posa PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms SHEET 1 OF 1 SOIL ENGINEER INSPECTOR: Frank Barrett LOCATION: WaRpingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GSI JOB NO. 327-07 We Started: 11/21/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Date Flnished: 11/21/07 H Auger HA S.S. Hole No. B-1 Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size L D. 3-114" 1-318" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LSS. Bit AT AFTER HRS IFall 30^ N Coordinate E. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON . SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL_ COLOR. LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN-REC. IN IN TYPE D 6 16-11211218 1824 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-1.6 1 19 1 5 SS 1 2 10 5/1" A' 5" Topsoil 4.5' 1) Medium -Light brown silty SAND. Grinding 3.0'-4.5' Auger refused at 4.5' EOB END OF BORING 4.5' F From Ground Surface to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet F_eet in Earth 4.6 Feet In Ro_c_K U N0. of Samples 1 Hole No. B-1 _ SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS =DRIVEN C =GORE A =AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 10-209/6 SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% CLIENT: General Borings, Inc. Advance Testing Compan P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER: Richard Pose PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms SHEET 1 OF 1 SOIL ENGINEER INSPECTOR: Frank Barrett LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO, 327-07 Date Started: 11!21/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Date Finished: 11!21!07 H Auger HAA S.S. Hole No. B-2 Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-114" 1-3l8" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 L65. Bit AT AFTER HRS Fall 3(r IN Coordinate 111. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per Foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC) ELEV. DEATH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN. IN REC. IN TYPE 0-6 16-12112 11818 24 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-2.0 1 24 10 4 1 SS SS 1 3 5 5 50.14 .5' 6" T soil 3.11' 1) Brown fine-medium SAND with roots. 2) Very dense-Light brown silty fine SAND, with gravel. Auger refused at 4.5' Offset 5.0' North Refusal at 3.0' 2.0-2.3 2 EOB -- END OF BORING 3.0' i i i - --- �- - - - - From Ground Surface to Feel Usad in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet 2 Feet in Earth 7.5"-" Feet in Rock 0 No. of Samples - 2 Hole No. B- - SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS =DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE - 140% LITTLE= = 10-20% SOME = 20-35°k AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER PROJECT NAME: Adams Falracre Farms CLIENT: Advance Testing Company FOREMANIDRILLER: Richard Posa INSPECTOR: Frank Barrett LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO, .327-07 Date Started: 11/21/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-3 H Auger HA S.S. Line & Station Date Finished: 11/29/07 Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-114" 1-3I8" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS AT AFTER HRS Hammer 140 LBS. Bit IN Coordinate lFall 30` E. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM -TO NO, PEN. IN REC. IN TYPE 0-6 16-1211218 1924 5 10 0-1.3 2.04.0 1 2 15 6 24 a SS _ SS 2 12 : 5014 3 4 5 6 10-0' 1) Very dense -Dark TOPSOIL (organics) Brown SILT and GRAVEL. 2) Loose -Light brown silty fine SAND, with trace gravel 3) Dense -Weathered ROCK Grinding 7.0'-10.0' Auger refused at 10.0 &0-7.0 3 24 22 SS 12 19 14 16 I 15 20 25 30 35 40 EOB END OF BORING 10.0' From Ground Surface to Feel Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For_ Feel Feel In Earth 10 Feet in_ Rock 0 _ _ No, of Sam tes 3 Hole No. b-3 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C =CORE A = AUGER _U = UNDISTURBED PISTON —. _ PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-109'0 LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 20-356 AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: General Borings, Inc. Advance Tesbn2 Company P. O, BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER- SOiL ENGINEER Richard Posa PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Frank Barrett LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started: 11/21/07 TYPE 1 S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-4 Date Finished: 11/21107 H Auger HA S . S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-1/4' 1-318^ Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS, Bit N Coordinate AT AFTER HRS lFall 30.. E. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC,) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN. IN REC. IN TYPE 0-6 16-1211218 1824 5 10 20 25 30 35 40 0-2.0 2-0-3.1 1 2 24 1 13 9 8SS SS 1 10 14 10 5 6 50/1: .4' 5" TO soil 4.5' 1) Medium -Brown fine -medium SAND, little silt and gravel. 2) Very dense -Light brown silty fine SAND, with roots, trace gravel. Hollow auger refused Offset 5.0' South Hollow auger refused at 45' i i END OF BORING 4.5' I i L 1 From Ground Suifaoe to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For — Feet Feet In Earth 4.5 Feet in Rock 0 No. of Samples 2 Hole No. Bal SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS =DRIVEN C =CORE""" A = AUGER U = UN©ISTD I ._.j RBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 20 35% AND M 35-5056 SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: General Borings, Inc. Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER: SOIL_ ENGINEER Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION_ Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started: 11/20/07 TYPE S Auger Date Finished: 11/20/07 H Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-5 HA S'S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-1/4" 1-318" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS lHammer 140 LOS. Bit IN Coordinate AT AFTER HRS Fall 30' 1 E, Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN.REC. IN IN TYPE 0 616-12112`1811824 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-2.0 1 2 24 18 24 14 SS SS 5 _6 10. ; 10 ! 10 1117 35 .3' 4" Topsoil _ 2.0-4.0 1.5' 1) Medium-Brown fine-medium SAND, some silt, little cinders, roots. FILL 6.5' Light brawn fine-coarse SAND and clayey SILT, some medium-coarse gravel. 2) Medium-Same as S-1 Gray fractured SHALE. Auger refused at 6.5' Offset 5.0' North Refusal at 7.0' Offset 5.0' South Refusal at 6.5' 5.0-5.3 3 3 2 SS 10013 i ! EOB END OF BORING 6.5' i � I i i From Ground Surface to Feel Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For _ _ _Feet Feet in Earth _ 20 Feet in Rock 0 No. or Samples 3 _Hole No. B-6 SAMPLE TYPE CODING SS = DRIVEN T C =CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE - 10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairaore Farms CLIENT: Advance Testing Company FOREMANIDRILLER: Erik DeiPriore INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO, 327-07 Date Started: 11/20/07 TYPE S Augerl AugerCasing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-6 H Auger HA S.S. Line & Station Date Finished: 11/20/07 Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-114' 1 -ale' Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS AT AFTER HRS lHarnmer 140 LBS. Bit IN Coordinate IlFall W.I E. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL, COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN. IN REC. 1N 1 TYPE 6-6 16-1211218 1824 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-1.5 1 18 16 SS 5 8 � 10016 .3' 3" Topsoil _ 4.0' 1) very dense -Gray -brawn fine -coarse SAND and clayey SILT, some fine - coarse gravel, decomposed. shale. Auger refused at 3.5' Offset 5.0' East Refusal at 3.0' Offset 5.0' West Refusal at 4.0' I_ — _ T EOB END OF BORING 4.0' 1... - - --- - From Ground Surface to Feet Used 'In. Casing Then in. Casing For eel ....- ...-_..__.. -_ ......_. _ .. ..._.... .. Feet in Earth 10.5 Feet in Rock0 No, of Samples 1 Note No. 9 6 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS - DRIVEN C ' CORE A = AUGER U -'UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 20-35%a AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms CLIENT: Advance Testing Company FOREMAN/DRILLER: Richard Posa INSPECTOR: Frank Barrett LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started- 11/21/07 TYPE S Augerl Casing Sampler 1 Core Bar Hole No. B-7 H Auger HA S.S. Line & Station Date Finished: 11/21107 Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-114' 1-318" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HI25 lHarnmer AT AFTER HRS lFall 140 LBS. it IN Coordinate 30" E. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF 5011., REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN. IN REC. IN TYPE 0-6 16-12112181182 5 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-.6 1 7 4 SS 4 '5011 2.5' 1) Very dense-Weathered ROCK 5" Topsoil Grinding 1.0'-2,5' Auger refused at 2.5' Ege ELAND OF BORING 2.5' --- - � l ------ -- - -.10 _ I i From Ground Surface to Feet Used in. Casing Then in, Casing For Feet Feat in Eadh 2.5 _Feet In Rock _ _0 No. of Samples 1 Hole No. B-7 PE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON SAMPLE TYV PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE =10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% General Borings, Inc. P- O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SHFFT 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Advance Testing Company FOREMAN/DRILLER: Richard Posa SOIL ENGINEER PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Frank Barrett LOCATION: Wa Alin ers.Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO, 327-07 Date Started: 11/21/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar H Auger HA S . S. Hole No. B-8 Date Finished: 11121/07 Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size 1. D. 3-114" 1-318" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS AT AFTER HRS lHammer 140 LBS. Bit IN Coordinate Fa1i 30" JE. Coordinate D E P T H. Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV• FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL_- COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN. IN REC. IN TYPE 0$ 16-12]12 18 18 24 5 10 20E 25 30 35 40 — - 11 6 f SS 10 5015 2.0' 1) Very dense -Top W TOPSOIL BRICK, DEBRIS and weathered ROCK. Grinding 1.0'-2.0' Auger refused at 2.0' EOB - — END OF BORING 2.0' ---.. _. _ _.---- I l .. i From Ground Surface to Feet Used in. Casing Then In. Casing For Feet Feet in Earth 2 Feet in Rock .0 _ No. of Samples 1 Hole No. 8-8 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = IJNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF CLIENT: General Borings, Inc. Advance Testing Company P. O, BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 05712 SOIL ENGINEER CA, neio.c.,1PPf1-IF!'T NAUP Adams Falrar-re Fa Ing INSPECTOR vJoseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fail; NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO- 327-07 Date Started: 11/19/07 TYPE S Auger Date Finished: 11/19/07 H Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-9 HA S . S, Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size I. D, 3-114" 1-318" Offset L R AT 6.0 AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS. Bit N Coordinate AT AFTER MRS Fall 30" 1 E. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOVIIS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR; LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. PEN, IN REC. IN TYPE 0.6 16-121121811824 5 10 15 20 25 30 30 35 40 0-2.0 2.0-4.0 1 2 24 17 24 15 SS SS 3 5 8 15 50 46 42 41 12-W 1) Stiff -Gray -brown SILT and fine -coarse SAND, little fine -coarse gravel, trace roots. 2) Hard -Gray -brown clayey SILT and fine -coarse GRAVEL, some fine -coarse sand, (till). 3) Very dense -Same as S-2 4) Very dense -Gray -brown fine -Coarse SAND and clayey SILT, some fine - coarse gravel, shale fragments. Auger refused at 12.0' 5.0-7.0 - 3 24 18 SS 11 22 23 23 10.0-10.9 4 11 8 SS 53 54/5. END OF BORING 12.0' Offset 5.0' East Refusal at 11.5' END OF BORING 11.5' ------------- ----- From Ground SurfaCe to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet Feet in Earth 23.5 Feet in Rock 0 _ No, of Samples 4 Role No. S-9 - ---- -- - - - -- -- --- U = UNDISTURBED PISTON SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS -DRIVEN C =CORE A = AUGER - ... --- ----_ .-_.. _.....-- — - ..........---._.. -- PROPORTIONS USED:. TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 4D -20°.b SOME = 20 35% AND = 35 5f3% SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms CLIENT: Advance Testing Cornearry FOREMAN/DRILLER: Erik DelPriore INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GSI JOB NO_ 327-07 Date Started: 11/19/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-10 H Auger HA S.S. Line & Station Date Finished 11/19107 Groundwater Observations Size 1. D. 3-114" 1-318" Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS lHarnmer AT AFTER HRS 140 LBS. Bit IN Coordinate Fall 1 30' JE. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per. foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV- FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL. REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM -TO NO. PEN. iN REC. IN TYPE 0-6, r6-1211218118 24 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-2.0 1 24 16 SS 6 11 1 33 19 15 38 49 54 3" 4" Topsoil SS 2.0! 1) Dense -Gray -brown tine -medium SAND and SILT, some fine -coarse ravel. 2.041.0 2 — 24 17 y 6.5' 2) Very dense -Gray -brown fine -coarse GRAVEL, fractured SHALE and gray clayey SILT. 3) Very dense -Gray fractured SHALE. Refusal at 6:5' 5.0-5.2 3 2 2 SS 5012 EOB END OF BORING 6.5' Offset 5A' North Refusal at 6:0' END OF BORING 6.0' T - - -- . - From (around Surface to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet Feel in Earth 12.5 Feet In Rock 0 No. or Samples 3Hole No. S-10 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE a 1-10% LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50 CLIENT: Advance Testing Company FOREMAN/DRILLER: - Erik DelPrbre INSPECTOR: Joseph Jambs Surface Elevation: Date Started: 11119107 Date Finished: 11/19107 Groundwater Observations AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS I D E P T H I SHEET 1 OF General Borings, Inc. BLOWS PER 5 INCHES ON SAMPLER P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO SOIL ENGINEER —NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms TYPE 4: Wap ingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER 10. 327-07 0-2.0 S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-11 H Auger HA s's I Line & Station 31/4". I-Xir Offset L R 14U LOS, Bit IN Coordinate I D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 5 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV, FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO PEN NO. IN REC. IN 1 TYPE o -r, 16-121121811824 0-2.0 -1 1 24 18 SS 5 7 15 '51 6" Topsoil 1) medium -Light brown -gray fine - 2.0,3.3 2 15 10 !�S 37 92 '10013 medium SAND and clayey SILT, some fine -coarse gravel. 2) Very dense -Gray fine -coarse GRAVEL, weathered SHALE. 5 3 0 0 SS 5.0/0 5.9 E013 3) No recovery or penetration. Auger refused at 5.0' IEND OF BORING 5.0' 10 Offset 5.0' North Refusal at 4.5' END OF BORING 4.6 15 SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: General Borings, Inc, Advance Testing Company P. 0. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER- SOIL ENGINEER Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started: 11/19/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-12 Date Finished: 11/19/07 H Auger HA S.S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size 1. D. 3-1/4" 1-318" Offset L R AT 6.0 AFTER 0.0 HRS lHarnmer 140 1-13S. Bit IN Coordinate AT AFTER HRS EF a11: 30" 1E. Coordinate D SAMPLE BLOWS E Casing PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, P blows DEPTH PEN. REG. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL.. COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET NO. IN IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC,) 0-6 16-12112 1811824 H foot FROM - TO ELEV. 0-2.0 1 24 10 SS 3 8 8 10 3' 4" Topsoil 1) Very stiff -Gray -brown SILT and fine - . .._ 2.0 -3,11 2 .. 13 11 SS 45 72 5011 coarse SAND, some fine -coarse gravel. 5 2) Hard -Same as S-1 3) Hard -Gray -brown clayey SILT and 5.0-7.0 3 24 16 SS 19 26 22 100! fine -coarse SAND, some fine -coarse 8.01 gravel, weathered shale. Eos N Auger refusal at 8.0' 10 END OF BORING 8.0' Offset 5.0' West Refusal at 7:5 END OF BORING 7.5' 15 20 25 30 35 40 From Ground Surface to Feet Used In. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet Feet In Earth 15.5 Feet in Rock 0 No. of Samples 3 Hole No. S-12 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 24-35% AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms CLIENT: Advance Testing Company FOREMAN/DRILLER: Erik DelPriore INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: WaRpingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO, 327-07 Date Started: 11/19/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. B-13 H Auger HA $ . S, Line & Station Date Finished: 11/18/07 Groundwater Observations Size I. D, 3 1!4^ t-vv, I Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS AT AFTER HRS Hemmer 140 LBS. Bit IN Coordinate Fall 30" JE. Coordinate D E P T H Casing blows per foot SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES ON SAMPLER STRATA CHANGE: DEPTH, ELEV, FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) DEPTH IN FEET FROM - TO NO. I PEN. IN REC, IN TYPE " 16-12112 18118 24 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-2.0 2.0-2.3 5.0-5.0 1 2 3 24 3 7 0 0 SS SS SS 5 6 3 7 5013 50/0 -3' 5.0 4" Topsoil 1) Loose-Brown fine-medium SAND and SILT, trace roots, trace fine-medium gravel 2) Very dense-Same as S-1, shale fragments. Auger refused at 5.0' EOB END OF BORING 5.0' Offset 5.0' South Refusal at 4.5 END OF BORING 4.5' _._............ _��- m Ground Surface to Feet Used m. Casing Then. in. . -- -. - Casing For Feet From ..9 .. _....... _._..-------- _ Feet in Earth 9.5_'-_ Feet In Rock 0 No, of Samples 2 Hole No. S-13 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS _DRIVEN C -CORE A -AUGER U -UNDISTURBED PISTON PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE =10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF 40 From Ground Surface to : General Borings, Inc. CLIENT: 20 -- —— Feet in Earth 15 Advance Testing Company 0 P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: FOREMANIDRILLER: C = CORE ...---•----_—_._.----..._. A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON— .._... SOIL ENGINEER Erik DelPdore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% INSPFCTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GSI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started: 11/20/07 TYPE I S Augerl AugerCasing Sam ler Core Bar Hole No. S-1 Date Finished: 11/20/07 -Auger er HA S.S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations _-R Size L D. 3-114" 1-M., Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS_ Bit N Coordinate AT AFTER HRS I Fall 301, JE. Coordinate D SAMPLE BLOWS E Casing PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL. P blows DEPTH PEN. REC, ON CHANGE; REMARKS (INCL. COLOR. LOSS T per IN FEET NO. IN IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC.) H foot FROM - TO 0-6 16-1211218 1824 ELEV. 0-2.0 1 24 16 SS 3 7 10 23 5' 6" To soil 1) Medium -Brown -.gray fine -medium 2.0-2,9 2 9 7 55 40 5013 SAND and clayey SILT, some fine- - coarse gravel. 5 5,0-5.0 . 3 0 0 SS 5010. 5.0' 2) Very dense -same as S- FOB 3) No penetration or recovery. - - Au er refused at 5.0' END OF BORING 5.0' 10 Offset 5.0' north Refusal at 4.5' END OF BORING 5.0' Offset 5.0' South 15 - Refusal at 5.0' END OF BORING 5.0' 40 From Ground Surface to : j in. Casing For Feet 20 -- —— Feet in Earth 15 Feet in Rock 0 No. of Samples 2 Hoke No. S 1 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: — SS = DRIVENPO C = CORE ...---•----_—_._.----..._. A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON— .._... PRnRTiONS USED: - 25 LITTLE w 10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% 30 ' ---- ---------- 35 35 - 40 From Ground Surface to Feet Used in. Casing For Feet E in. Casing Then -- —— Feet in Earth 15 Feet in Rock 0 No. of Samples 2 Hoke No. S 1 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: — SS = DRIVENPO C = CORE ...---•----_—_._.----..._. A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON— .._... PRnRTiONS USED: - ------------__.._.. --- TRACE = 1-100/6 LITTLE w 10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 35-50% SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. CLIENT: Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER: 501E ENGINEER Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO, 327-07 Date Started: 11120/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. 5-2 Date Finished: 11/20/07 H Auger HA S.S. NQ Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size 1. D. 3-114" 1-318` 2-11(Y" Offset L R AT 7.5 AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS, it IN Coordinate Drill Water AFTER HRS Fall 30" Diamond IE. Coordinate D SAMPLE BLOWS E Casing PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, P blows DEPTH PEN. REC. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET NO. IN IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, of WASH WATER, ETC.). H foot FROM - TO 0-6 16-12112 1811824 ELEV, 0-1.3 1 15 7 SS 16 1 19 10013 .2' 2" Topsoil - - ---- - - --- T ` — 1) Hard -Brown -gray clayey SILT and fine -coarse GRAVEL, little tine -medium SAND, fractured shale. 5 5.0-5.2 2 2 0 SS 50122) No recovery 7.0' Decomposed shale, refusal at 7.0' a-51 Offset 5.0' North --- _ =- -1 0.5 Refusal at 7.0' 10 ; 1 Rurr#1-Cored Rock 7.0'-12.0' 1.5 Recovered 42" gray decomposed 7.0-12.0 1 60 ' 42 C 1.5 12.V fractured SHALE. E08 END OF BORING 12.0' 15 20 3 25 30 35 40 -Feet From Ground Surface to ed Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet in Earth 14 Feet in Rock 5 No. of Samples - 2 Hole No. S-2 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DVEN C = CARE A = AUGER U =UNDISTURBED PISTON RI — SHEET 1 OF 1 (General Borings, Inc, CLIENT: Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER: SOIL ENGINEER Erik DelPdore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre f=arms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: Date Started: 11/19/07 GBI JOB NO. 327-07 TYPE S Auger I I Casing Sampler7 Core Bar Hole No. 5-3 Date Finished: 11/20/07 H Au er HA S.S. NQ Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size h D. 3-114" 1-318` 2-118" Offset L R AT 7.0 AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS. Bit N Coordinate Drill Water AFTER HRS t=all 30' Diamond E, Coordinate D SAMPLE BLOWS E Casing PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, P blows DEPTH PEN, REC. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET NO- IN IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC.) H foot FROM - TO 0-6 16-1211218 1824 ELEV. 0-1.3 1 16 12 SS 2 4 5014 3• 4•' Topsoil 1) Very dense -Brown fine -medium - -.. . . SAND, some silt, little fine -medium -- - gravel, trace roots, cobbles -boulders. 5 5.0,7.02 24 18 SS 23 , 33 43 74 2) Very dense -Tan -light brown One - medium SAND and SILT, some fine- - - - -- . medium gravel, shale fragments: s.a• 10 1 Run#1-Cored Rock 9.0'-14.0' 0,5 Recovered 38" gray fractured 1 decomposed SHALE. 9-0-14.0 1 60 38 C 2 14.0' RQD= 15 — EOB END OF BORING 14.0' 20 25 .. .... ...... 30 35 40 1 From Ground Su ace to Feet Used in. Casing sing Then in. Casing For Feet . . ... .. ------ Feet in Earth 9 E - - in Rock Samples le No. S 3 _. . ,, - .._- .. ODING: SAMPLE TYPE C - ... SS - 11E 09& - 51 -URGED PISTON An U - NDI- C - CORE '4 - - .._ PROPORTIONS USED. _ '''LITTLE= E RAC ° _ - 35y - 50% OME-20-35k AND 10-20°k SOME SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. CLIENT: Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER: SOIL ENGINEER Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GSI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started: 11/20/07 TYPE S Au er (Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. S-4 Date Finished: 11/20/07 H Auger HA S ' S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations. I Size I. O. 3-114" 1-318- Offset L R AT None AFTER 0-0 HRS lHammer 14a LBS. Bit N Coordinate 30" 1 E. Coordinate AT AFTER HRS IFell D I SAMPLE BLOWS E Casing PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SDIL, P blows DEPTH PEN. REC. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET NO. IN IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC.) H foot FROM - TO 0-6 1-12 12 18118 24 ELEV. 0-1.7 1 20 6 SS 3 7 24 5012 .3' 4" Topsoil — --- — 1)Medium-Brown-grayfine-me4dium SAND, some silt, some fine-coarse 4.0' gravel, fractured shale. 5 EOB Refused at 3.5` Offset 5.0' West Refusal at 3.0' Offset 4.0` South refusal at 4.9 . END OF BORING 4.0' 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 From Ground Surface to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet Feet in Earth 10.5 Feet in Rock 0 No. of Samples 1 "Ole No. S-4 _ _ SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS =DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON - - --- — -- -- --- _ PROPORTIONS USED: _TRACE"1-10% —� --- = 20-35% AND - - ° LITTLE = 1f1-20% SOME = 35-b0°k CLIENT: Advance Testing Ca FOREMANIDRILLER,.! Erik DelPriore i INSPECTOR: Josepi Surface Elevation: General Borings, Inc. P. O- BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 NO. 327-07 SHEET 1 OF 1 SOIL ENGINEER DESIGN ENGINEER Bar Hole No. S-5 ate Finished, 11/20/07 H Auger HA S . S- Line &Station Groundwater Observations Size I. D. 3-114" 1-318" Offset L R T 6.5 AFTER 0.0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS, Bit IN Coordinate T AFTER HRS Fall 3D" E. Coordinate O SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, E P Casing blows DEPTH PEN. REG. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET NO. IN IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC.) H foot FROM - TO 0-5 16-121112 7824 FLEV. 0-2.0 1 24 18 SS 9 11 8 E 10 .3' 4" Topsoil -- -- 1) Medium -Gray -tan fine -coarse SAND 2.0-4.0 2 24 21 5S 13 12 ' 12 1 11 and clayey SILT, some fine -coarse gravel, shale fragments. 2) Medium -Same as S-1 5 3) Dense -Same as S-1 5,0-7.0 3 24 17 SS 7 9 26 18 7.0-9.0 4 24 18 SS 27 29 26 24 4) Very dense -Same as S-1 10 10.0-10.0 5 0 0 S5 50101 1 I 10.s 5) No penetration or recovery. EOB Auger refused at 10.5' END OF BORING 10.5' Offset 5.0' North ------------ _._ .._ .._. _.._..... _ ._ . _.. _ ....... Refusal at 9:5' 15 END OF BORING 9.5' 20 25 30 35 40 From Ground Surface to Feel Used in. Casing Then in. asing For Feet ISAMPLE Feet rn EaRh 2U Feet in Rock i3 No: of Samples a Hole No. 5 5 TYPE CODING: SS -DRIVEN G -CORE ISTURBED PISTON A'� AUGER U - UND „ -,_ SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: General Borings, Inc. Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 FOREMAN/DRILLER: 501E ENGINEER Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: GBI JOB NO. 327-07 Date Started: 11/19/07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. S-6 Date Finished: 11/19/07 H Auger HA S.S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size 1. D. 3-114 1-31W Offset L R AT None AFTER 0.0 AT AFTER HRS jHammer HRS Fall 140 LBS. Bit 301, IN Coordinate IE. Coordinate D SAMPLE. E Casing P blows DEPTH T per IN FEET H foot FROM - TO 0-2.0 I BLOWS PER 6 INCHES STRATA ON CHANGE: SAMPLER DEPTH, U-6 6-12 L1218 1824 ELEV. 9 64 33 11 .3' FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WASH WATER, ETC.) 4" Topsoil PEN. REC. NO. IN IN 1 24 18 TYPE SS 1) Very dense-Brown-.gray fine-medium — 2.0-2.2 ---_...... 2 2 0 S5 _ S 5012 - - - — ---- -- -- -- 4.5' SAND and clayey SILT, some fine coarse gravel, shale fragments 5 2) No recovery. ; 17013 Refusal at 4.5' END OF BORING 4.5' Offset 5.0' West 10 Refusal at 4.0' END OF BORING 4.5' Offset 5.0' East Refusal at 4.5' -- --- - _ ._-- - - -- END OF BORING 4.5' 15 20 25 30 35 40 From Ground SuFface toFeet rdh Feet in Ea SAMPLE TYPE CODING: 9 PROPORTIONS USED. SS = DRIVEN °et TRACE 1-10% Used in Rock Irl. Casing Then in. Casing No. SaMples C _ COR-20% SOME= 20 LITTLE0 For Feet 2 Hole No. S-6 3586 AND= 35-50"/o BED PISTON SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. CLIENT: Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER FOREMAN/DRILLER: Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION. Wap in ers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: 11120107 GBI JOB NO- 327-07 TYPE S Auger Casing Sampler Core Bar Hole No. S-7 Date Started: Date Finished: 11120!07 H Auger I HA S . S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size I. D_ 3 1!4" t -3J8" Offset R A7 7.5 AFTER 0-0 HRS Hammer 140 LBS. Bit N Coordinate Drill Water AFTER HRS Fall 30' 1E. Coordinate D SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, E Casing P blows DEPTH N. REC. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL_ COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET N IN TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER, ETC.) H foot FROM - TO (l6 6-121121 iB2a ELEV. 0-2.0 24 14 SS 4 7 6 7 _3' 4" To soil 1)Medium-Brown-gray fine -medium 2.0-3.4 2 18 16 SS 29 53 72 SAND and SILT, Tittle fine coarse - - _ ._....._. gravel. - --- 2) Hard -Gray -brown clayey SILT and 5,0-7.0 3 24 19 SS 35 50 39 47 fine -coarse GRAVEL, some fine -medium sand. 3) Hard -Same as S-2, decomposed rock. 1o.0' Auger refused 10 1 -- -- 0.5 Run#1-Cored Rock 10.0'-14.0' _.... - -- 1 Recovered 30" gray decomposed 10.0-14.0 1 48 30 C 1 14.0' comiDletely fractured SHALE. RQD=O°h 15 1 1.5 Run#2-Cored Rock 14.0'-19.9 1.5 Recovered 58" gray fractured SHALE. 2 RQD=85% 14.0-19.0 2 60 58 C 1.5 19.0' EOB END OF BORING 19.0' 20 25 30 35 40 _ From Ground 5u ace to Feet Used In. Casing Then In. Casing For Feet Feet In Earth 14 Feet in Rode 9 No. of Samples 3 Hole No. 8-7 C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE = 1-10% LITTLE = 10-20% SOME = 20-35% AND = 36-50% 30 35 - 40 From round Surface_ to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet Feet in Earth 9 Feet In Rock 0 No. of Samples_ 2 Hole No. S-8 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON _ nn oco� aAkrl - Q4_rr1O�. SHEET 1 OF 1 General Borings, Inc. CLIENT: Advance Testing Company P. O. BOX 7135 PROSPECT, CT 06712 SOIL ENGINEER FOREMAN/DRILLER: Erik DelPriore PROJECT NAME: Adams Fairacre Farms INSPECTOR: Joseph Jacobs LOCATION: Wappingers Fall, NY DESIGN ENGINEER Surface Elevation: Date Started: 11/19/07 GBI JOB NO. TYPE I 327-07 S Au er Casing I Sampler Core Bar !foie No. S-8 . Date Finished: 11/19/07 li Au er HA 5 . S. Line & Station Groundwater Observations Size 1. D. 3-114" 1-318 Offset L R AT None AFTER OA HR5 Hammer 140 LBS. Bit IN Coordinate AT AFT!=R HR5 Fall 30^ JE. Coordinate D SAMPLE BLOWS E Casing PER 6 INCHES STRATA FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL, P blows DEPTH PEN. REC. ON CHANGE: REMARKS (INCL. COLOR, LOSS T per IN FEET NO. IN IN. TYPE SAMPLER DEPTH, OF WASH WATER. ETC.) H foot FROM - TO Of16-12112 1$ 1824 ELEV. 0-2.0 1 24 17 55 2 3 4 2 .3' 4" To oil - ....... ... . ...- .. . . ._ . 1) Loose-Brown.fine-medium SAND an — - 2.0-2.5 2-- 6 f 4 SS -15 :50/0 - -- 3.0' SILT, some fine -coarse gravel. - - --- - — - EOB 2) Very dense -Brown -gray fine -medium —____ -_. __----_-.•--___-.. --- - -... ----- ---- - - ..___..-.----..._... SAND and clayey SILT, some fine- s coarse gravel_ Refusal at 3.0' END OF BORING 3.0' Offset 5.0' South 10 Refusal at 3.0' ----- _ offset 2.5' END OF BORING 3:0' 15 20 30 35 - 40 From round Surface_ to Feet Used in. Casing Then in. Casing For Feet Feet in Earth 9 Feet In Rock 0 No. of Samples_ 2 Hole No. S-8 SAMPLE TYPE CODING: SS = DRIVEN C = CORE A = AUGER U = UNDISTURBED PISTON _ nn oco� aAkrl - Q4_rr1O�. a a �z .o o � C b m i M u . nn O u au o. U ' w d N a ! � x •-Nwv I� FS � � v O L ; T M.� GiJ C U. �z C b m i M •U � � 00 0.� O U ' w d N a ! � x �z O O t ON lA 00 a a x a U U z y. 0 U 0 z H W W U A 40 L G N w � M 0 � 'N o 0 U � � � y ao x o tau V) a r r� ao o+ 04 � GG N T NY 1-1 w3 yo L G N w � M � I o U � � ao x o O CL �- b o 43 10 as o d; N d � � H N a wvi4.^'av, t�; 06 3. � Y w7N7���-++ AGr4 W QG� N C7 r .b L. 0 0 w c/� O �¢ E o a a o s � "" cv a z I � 1 Advane, O Client: ITinkelman Architects aterial:: Isoil tion: in-place Sam led: 11/19/07-11/21/07 Tested: 11/26/2007 3348 Route 208, Campbell Hall, NY 10916 Phone: 846-496-1600 Fax: 845-496-1398 42 Day Farm Road, West Stockbridge, MA 01266 P hone/Fax: 413-232-8566 Project Number: Lab Number: Item Number: Sampled By: Tested Bv: Adams Fairacre 070706 07- l 062A -T No Spec Items J. Jacobs/ F. Barrett E. Rodriguez rt of Natural Moisture Content of Soil and Rock Test Method: ASTM D2216 . — LAB # Sample % Moisture A SIS] 12.4 B S 1 S2 9.3 C S3S2 7.8 D S5S2 14.0 E S5S3 10.8 F S5S4 16.7 G S6S 1 14.2 H S7S2 7.8 1 S7S3 7.2 J S8S2 9.7 K BIS] 21.2 L B2S1 11.6 M B3S2 12.9 N B4S2 14.3 O B5S2 14.0 P B9S2 13.0 Q B9S3 9.7 R B9S4 6.7 S B 1253 13.5 T B13S1 15.9 1l o o�u4 Report Reviewed By: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission from Advance Testing Company, Inc. D Adv 3348 Route 208, Campbell Hall, NY 10916 Phone: 845-496-1600 Fax: 845496-1398 ' 42 Day Farm Road, Wesi Stockbridge, MA 01266 Phone/Fax:413-232-8566, GRADATION (SIEVE ANALYSIS) OF SOIL OR AGGREGATE ACTMflA9i r1'MB 1-117-AACIITOT11.T27.T88 Lab Number Sample Type Sampling Location Specification 07-1062F Borings Sieve Size mm Tinkelman Architecture .Project: Adams Fairacre Farms Material. Borings Project Number: 070706 FSampied: In Place Lab Number: 07-1062F 62.5 mm 11/19/2007 Sam led B - Joe Jacobs, Frank Barrett 50.0 mm 11/27/2007 Tested By: J. Brinsfield GRADATION (SIEVE ANALYSIS) OF SOIL OR AGGREGATE ACTMflA9i r1'MB 1-117-AACIITOT11.T27.T88 Lab Number Sample Type Sampling Location Specification 07-1062F Borings Sieve Size mm Inches % Retain % Spec. % Passing_Pass 100.0 mm 4" 0.0 100.0 75.0 mm 3" 0.0 100.0 . 62.5 mm 2 112" 0.0 100.0 50.0 mm 2" 10.0 100.0 37.5 mm 1 112" 0.0 100.0 25.0 mm V 0.6 100.0 19.0 mm . 314" 0.0 100.0 12.5 mm 112" 0.0 100.0 632 mm 114" 2.5 97.5 4.75 mm #4 2.1 95.4 2.00 mm #10 5.1 90.3. 0.850 mm #20 3.0 87.3 0,600 mm #30 1.4 85.9 0.425 mm #40 2.0 83.9 0.150 tam #100 10.1 73.8 0.075 mm #{200 8.4 65.4 Pan 65.4 Comments: Minus #200 by wash -sieve method. Report Reviewed By: PDF rf111"Prea-VI T in 3348 Route 208, Campbell Hall, NY 10916 Phone; 845-496-1600 Fax: 845-496-1398 42 Day Farm Road, West Stockbridge, MA 01266 Phone/Fax:413-232-8566 Client: Tinkelman Architecture Project: Adams Fairacre Farms Material: Borings Project Number: 070706 Source: In Place Lab Number: 07-1062N Date Sampled: 11/19/2007 Sampled By: Joe Jacobs, /:rank Barnett Date Tested: 11/27/2007 Tested By: J. Brinsfield GRADATION JSIEVE ANALYSES) OF SOIL OR AGGREGATE l Test Method(s): ASTM 1)422, C136, C117: AASHTO T11. T27. T88 Lab Number Sample !me I Samplin-i location Specification 07-1062N Borings Sieve Size mm Inches . % Retain % Spec. % PassinIZ Pass 100.0 mm 4" 0.0 . 100.0 75.0 mm 3" 0.0 100.0 62.5 mm 2 1/2" 0.0 100.0 50.0 mm 2" 0.0 100.0 37.5 mm 1 1/2" 0.0 100.0 25.0 min P. 0.0 100.0 19.0 mm 3l4" 34.5 65.5 12.5 mm 1/2" 0.7 64.8 6.32 mm 1/4" 5.3 59.5 4.75 mm #4 2.0 57.5 2.00 mm #10 4.4 53.1 0.850 mm #20 2.9 50.2 0.600 mm #30 1.5 48.7 OA25mm #40 1.1 47,6 0.150 mm #100 4.3 43.3 0.075 mm #200 5.3 38.0 Pan 38.0 Comments: Minus #200 by wash -sieve method. Report Reviewed By: pbF 1 1Tom T 1 11 i! 3348 Route 208, Campbell Hall, NY 10916 Phone: 845-096-1600 Fax: 845-496-1398 42 Day Farm Road, West Stockbridge, MA 01256 Phone/Fax: 413-232-8666 Client: Tinkelman Architecture Project: Adams Fairacre Farms Material:. Borings Project ff: 070706 Source: In Place ATC Lab No.. 07-1062F Date Sampled: 11/19/2007 Sampled By: Joe Jacobs, Frank Barrett ate Tested: 11/27/07 Tested By: J. Brinsfield REPORT OF ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS TEST METHOD: ASTM D4318. LL Method A Lab Number: 07-1062F Specification Liquid Limit; 33 Plastic Limit: 23 Plasticity index: 1 10 Notes: Values shown are percent moisture. Customary procedure is to round results to the nearest whole number. Sample was air-dried Comments: 110 Report Reviewed By: This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Advance Testing Company, Inc. FDF EMT! k"'POT-1 Test* n 334.8 Route 208, Campbell hall, NY 10916 Phone: 845-496-1600 Fax: 845-496-1398 42 Day Farm Road, West Stockbridge, MA 01266 Phone/Fax: 413 -232-8566 Client: Tinkelman Architecture Project: Adams Fairacre Farms Material: Borings Project #: 070706 Source: In Place ATC Lab No.: 07-1062N Date Sam led: 11/19/2007 Sam led B : Joe Jacobs, Frank. Barrett Date Tested: 11/27107 Tested By: J. Brinsfield REPORT OF ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS TEST METHOD: ASTM D4318; LL Method A Lab Number: 07-1062N S eeification Liquid Limit: 25 Plastic Limit: 22 Plasticit Index: 3 Notes: Values shown are percept moisture. Customary procedure is to round results to the nearest whole number. Sample was air-dried Comments: '--960UA�4� Report Reviewed By: &% This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of Advance Testing Company, Inc. PDF Wetland Functional Evaluation Report Adams Fairacre Farm Route 9 Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, NY April 16, 2007 Prepared by: Michael Nowicki Ecological Solutions, LLC 1248 Southford Road Southbury, Connecticut 06488 1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Summary............................................................. 3 2.0 Background....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Introduction....................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Wetland Functional Evaluation..................................................................... 8 5.0 Summary of Results of Functional Assessment - (pre -Development).... 9 6.0 Summary of Results of Functional Assessment - (Post -Development) 11 7.0 Standards For Permit Issuance.....................................................................13 Wetland Functional Evaluation Report Subject Property: Adams Fairacre Farm Applicant: . Pat Adams Date: April 16, 2007 1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS/SUMMARY Ecological Solutions, LLC completed a wetland functional evaluation and wetland/buffer impact assessment for the proposed Adams Fairacre Farm market on Route 9 in Wappinger, New York. The wetland boundaries on the propertyhave been reviewed and accepted by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and are also subject to regulation by the Town of Wappinger. There are no NYSDEC regulated wetlands on the site. It is noted that there are two wetland segments on the site, a smaller northern wetland that isnot regulated by the USACE because it is isolated and a southern wetland that drains to a culvert under Route 9 down Fowlerhouse Road to a wetland at the bottom of the hill. Several investigations in the Fowlerhouse Road area show a ditch with little water flow. It may be that water draining from the subject site is stored in the culvert under Route 9 and slowly discharges. Both wetland areas on the site are regulated by the Town of Wappinger. At the beginning of the process, the Applicant conducted a multi -stage screening process that evaluated several properties along the Route 9 corridor in the Town of Wappinger for the proposed Adams Farm Market. The business decision was.made by the Applicant to move forward with the proposed project in Wappinger for two main reasons. First, Adams Farm Markets are currently located in the Town of Poughkeepsie, the Town of Newburgh, and the City of Kingston. A new store in Wappinger would serve residents in Wappinger and immediately surrounding area currently traveling to either Newburgh or Poughkeepsie with both stores being located 20 to 30 minutes driving time from the proposed Route 9 site. Secondly, the proposed location is logistically sound since there is adequate access to Route 9 for truck deliveries and the expected auto traffic to the proposed facility. The Adams Farm Market has minimum square footage requirements that must .be met in order for this business to run effectively and attain positive results. All of the three Adams Farm Markets currently existing have a similar configuration that has been developed and shown to work. The Applicant therefore required a property that would be located on Route 9 and would contain at least 10 to 15 acres of property for a new store location. The Applicant consulted professional and governmental organizations to identify as many potential sites as possible that had the minimum attributes necessary to accommodate the proposed project in Wappinger. Several properties were reviewed during the screening process and found to be well below the minimum standards required for the proposed Adams Farm Market. The screening criteria utilized for the property search ultimately led the Applicant to the current location and the decision to proceed with this project was based on property size, location, environmental constraints, and, cost. Other properties reviewed were ultimately rejected due to limited acreage of the site, wetlands and environmental constraints, as well as other factors including access, zoning, and cost. The screening process demonstrated that there is no practicable alternative site in Wappinger to the proposed location for the proposed Adams Farm Market. Once the current site was chosen, . the Applicant retained Tinkelman Architecture, Morris Associates, and Ecological Solutions, LLC to develop a plan that balances economic benefit, services for Wappinger residents, and environmental protection. During this planning phase at least a dozen alternative plans were developed for the proposed Adams Farm Market on the site. The first plan took the basic .Adams Farm model and applied the design to the site. This original plan was rejected because of large environmental impacts that would occur on the site. It is apparent that wetland and buffer impacts on the site cannot be avoided. It is also . noted that all of the other sites in Wappinger reviewed by the Applicant would have substantially larger wetland and buffer impacts given the size and scope of the project. The Applicant allowed flexibility with .the .site design so that as much as possible wetland and environmental impacts were minimized and the essential requirements to operate this type of retail business were met (square footage, parking, landscaping, etc.). Several iterations and building layouts were exhaustively reviewed until the final plan was generated. The most recent plan shows that the proposed project has approximately 0.49 acres of impact proposed to federal regulated wetland and approximately 0.71 acres of impact. to Town regulated wetland on the property that includes the Federal wetland impact areas. The wetland impacts have been minimized to the amounts stated above. The activities proposed on the site will also necessarily impact a portion of the 100 foot regulated buffer on the site. Wetland mitigation efforts will result in no net loss of wetlands on the property by providing 0.71 acres of created wetland on the site. Supporting documentation provided in this report verifies that the Applicant has met the standards and requirements set forth in Section.137-9 of the Town of Wappinger Code and that the proposed regulated activities can be permitted without significant impact to the wetland functions and that the wetland and buffer impacts can be mitigated with the proposed wetland mitigation planned for the project. Existing conditions on the proposed Adams Farm Market site are varied and more importantly are contained to this site because the site is bordered by residential development to the east and commercial development to the north, south, and west. The site currently contains two residential/ commercial structures, the two delineated wetlands, young age upland forest intermingled with junked cars, scrap metal, and other debris along the western border of the wetland in the 100 foot buffer. 2.O13ACKGROUND Below is a surnmary of the existing conditions on the Adams Fairacre Farm property that contains Federal and Local - ' Town of Wappinger regulated wetlands and the proposed impacts to these wetlands and associated 100 - foot buffer area designated by the Town of Wappinger. There are two separate wetland areas located on the property that were delineated based on the 1957 Wetland Delineation Manual utilized by the Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the 1989 Manual utilized by the Town of Wappinger. The northern wetland is an isolated wetland pocket as determined by the USACE during their field visit and extends north to the Mercedes Dealership property adjacent to the site. This wetland is bordered by several residences that appear to be slightly higher in. elevation than the wetland. The wetland is mostly open water of varying depth with fringe wetland vegetation including spicebush and red -osier dogwood around most of its border. The southern wetland is the larger wetland on the site and is a forested swamp containing dominant .vegetation including red maple, American, elm, sensitive fern, and skunk cabbage associated with an open water area and small tributary that drains the wetland south into the culvert under Route 9. The upland buffer area immediately adjacent to the wetlands is a mix of young upland hardwoods dominated by sugar and red maple, eastern red cedar, and some oak and hickory. The understory of the buffer is generally sparse and contains saplings of the dominant species. The 100 foot buffer surrounding each wetlands does contain previous impacts as stated before. This is due to the location of the site along Route 9, presence of buildings on the site and human habitation, and presence of businesses on both northern and southern boundaries of the site. It appears that one of the residences on the site is also an automobile inspection station and storage area for junk cars. The project area contains both developed and undeveloped land. Several activities are proposed in the wetlands on the site. The activities include filling some of the southern wetland regulated by the USACE and Town for parking and filling of a small portion of the .northern Town regulated wetland for truck access to the rear of the Adams. Farm Market for deliveries. The proposed impacts to the federally regulated wetland will require that the Applicant obtain a permit from the USACE. The project appears to qualify for a Nationwide Permit #39 for Commercial and Institutional Developments. On March 19,. 2007 the Nationwide Permits were reauthorized with changes. The changes to the Nationwide Permits and how they are applied to a project do not affect this project. Table 2.04 Wetland Functions Identified By Town Code (1) Flood and storm control by the hydrologic absorption and storage capacity of freshwater wetlands. (2) Wildlife habitat by providing breeding, nesting and feeding grounds and cover for many forms of wildlife, wildfowl and shorebirds, including migratory wildfowl and rare species. (3) Protection of subsurface water resources and provision for valuable watersheds and recharging groundwater supplies. (4) Recreation by providing areas for hunting, bird watching, photography and other uses. (5) Pollution treatment by serving as biological and chemical oxidation basins. (6) Erosion control by serving as. sedimentation areas and filtering basins, absorbing silt and organic matter. (7) Education and scientific research by providing readily accessible outdoor biophysical laboratories, living classrooms and training and education resources. (8) Open space and aesthetic appreciation. (9). Sources of nutrients in freshwater food cycles and nursery grounds and sanctuaries for freshwater fish. As shown by the following wetland functional evaluation there is no significant impact to any of the listed wetland functions from the proposed buffer activities. 3.0 INTRODUCTION Two site investigations and analyses of the wetlands on the property were conducted during April 2007 to determine the functions and benefits provided by the wetlands and to determine the impacts to these functions from the proposed development. The Hollands and Mageel Functional Evaluation Methodology was utilized to determine and quantify the functions provided by the wetlands on the subject property. This methodology is a semi -quantitative model that was developed to analyze wetland systems in the Northeast. The data obtained from this Pre - Development assessment was compared to data obtained from a theoretical Post - Development dry run of the methodology after considering the proposed wetland impacts on the site. In addition to field analyses, the following materials were reviewed: • National Wetlands Inventory Map - Wappingers Falls Quadrangle • Dutchess County Soil Survey • NYSDEC Wetland and Stream Map The functional model used for this evaluation yields reliable results when utilized to obtain a value of an existing wetland on a site but is limited when comparing. existing conditions to proposed conditions where some wetland impact is proposed. The functional value of the wetlands on this site will be impacted since there will be some wetland loss but both of the wetlands will continue to provide functionality albeit at some reduced levels. The wetland mitigation plan proposes to recreate the lost capacity from the proposed site development. Hollands and Magee Wetland Functional Evaluation Methodology. 4.0 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION The northern wetland located on the subject property is an isolated wetland pocket with approximately 1-2 feet of standing water at the time of the field visits in April 2007. This wetland contains a fringe of wetland vegetation immediately surrounding the open water area and gabion walls immediately north of the property. The southern Welland also contains an open water area and a forested component. There is an associated small tributary that flows out of the property behind an adjacent business to the south and then across Route 9 via culvert. The culvert outlets across Route 9 on to and across the rear of several residential properties on Fowlerhouse Road. Flow from the culvert however is inconsistent. The functions and relative values of freshwater wetlands are determined by biological and physical characteristics, including: the position of the wetland in the landscape, the geology and hydrology of the site, and the substrate and vegetation comprising the wetlands. Several methodologies have been developed to assess, in a semi -quantitative manner, the relative functional values of freshwater wetlands. For this study, the Hollands and Magee (1985) method was used to evaluate wetland functions that incorporate a range of biological and hydrologic interests. The wetland system on the subject property was evaluated for biological functions, hydrologic support functions, groundwater protection functions, storm and floodwater storage functions, and water quality maintenance functions. The data gathered during the field investigations was used for the functional models. The results of the analysis are summarized in the table attached to the end of this report. 5.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT - (PRE - DEVELOPMENT) Project Name: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARM Wetland: Southern Wetland Project Name: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARM Wetland: Northern Wetland Pocket The results summarized above were derived using the Hollands and Magee (1985) method for evaluating wetland functional values. Data obtained from the field is input into the model and the derived value for the wetland under evaluation is obtained. The range and mean values represent typical wetlands that have been evaluated by the model authors in the glaciated northeast. All values given should be considered as relative values and are not intended to assign a finite value or rank to .a particular wetland. 6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT - (POST - DEVELOPMENT) Project Name: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARM Wetland: Southern Wetland Project Name: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARM Wetland: Northern Wetland Pocket The results summarized above were derived using the Hollands and Magee (1985) method for evaluating wetland functional values. The last number listed in the table after the model is the derived value for the wetland under evaluation. The range and mean values represent typical wetlands that have been evaluated by the model authors in the glaciated northeast. All values given should be considered as relative values and are not intended to assign a finite value or rank to a particular wetland. 7.0 STANDARDS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE { This section is prepared in accordance with Section 137-9 of the Town of Wappinger Code entitled "Standards for decisions on applications". Ecological Solutions, LLC completed a wetland functional evaluation and wetland/buffer impact assessment of the proposed Adams Farm Market site. The wetland boundaries on the property have been reviewed and accepted by the USACE. A (1) - The proposed regulated activity is consistent with the policy of this chapter to preserve, protect. and conserve freshwater wetlands and the benefits derived therefrom, to prevent the despoliation and destruction of freshwater wetlands and to regulate the development of such wetlands in order to secure the natural benefits of freshwater wetlands, consistent with the general welfare and beneficial economic, social and agricultural development of the town. A business decision was made by the Applicant to move forward with the proposed project in the Town of Wappinger because a new store in Wappinger would be strategically located midway between existing stores in Poughkeepsie and Newburgh and would serve the residents of the Town of Wappinger and immediately surrounding area. These residents that utilize Adams Farm Market currently must travel to either Newburgh or Poughkeepsie with both stores being located 20 to 30 minutes driving time from the proposed Route 9 site. No other property located in Wappinger on the Route 9 corridor meets the minimum criteria to support this type of use without substantially more wetland impact. All impacts to wetlands and buffer area have been minimized and will be mitigated to provide wetland functional capacity. An additional benefit for the Town would be the extension of municipal sewer and water lines to the site by the Applicant which could then be brought to additional residents of the Town particularly Fowlerhouse Road. (2) - The proposed regulated activity is consistent with the applicable land use regulations pursuant to § 24-0903 of Article 24 of the State Environmental Conservation Law. No NYSDEC Article 24 Freshwater Wetlands are located on or in the vicinity of the site and no Article 24 Permit is required for the proposed project. (3) - The proposed regulated activity is compatible with the public health and welfare. The proposed activity is consistent with "public health and welfare" and is meant to benefit the public as well as the Applicant. Please also see the response to A(1) above. (4) - The proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary. q The Applicant completed an exhaustive search for properties along Route 9 in Wappinger to support the proposed Adams Farm Market. Demand for the Adams j Farm Market is so great that residents currently travel 20-30 minutes including over the Newburgh - Beacon Bridge to obtain the products sold at this store. The location selected for this use will not only benefit. the applicant but residents as well. (5) - There is no reasonable alternative for the proposed regulated activity on a site which is nota freshwater wetland or adjacent area. At the beginning of the process, the Applicant conducted a multi -stage screening process that evaluated several properties along the Route 9 corridor in the Town of Wappinger for the proposed Adams Farm Market. The business decision was made by the Applicant to move forward with the proposed project in Wappinger for two main reasons. First, Adams Farm Markets are currently located in the Town of Poughkeepsie, the Town of Newburgh, and the City of Kingston. A new store in Wappinger would serve residents in Wappinger and immediately surrounding area currently traveling to either Newburgh or Poughkeepsie with both stores being located 20 to 30 minutes driving time from the proposed Route 9 site. Secondly, the proposed location is logistically sound since there is adequate access to Route 9 for truck deliveries and the expected auto traffic to the proposed facility. (6) - In the event of negative impact(s), the mitigation proposed will mitigate adverse impact(s) identified in a manner that will allow the aquatic resource(s) to function in a manner substantially equivalent to the functioning of such resource(s) prior to the proposed activity. A wetland establishment and buffer mitigation plan has been submitted to the Town as well as the USACE for review and approval. The mitigation effort will ensure that the functional capacity of the wetlands on the site will remain at current levels. APPENDIX A DATA SHEETS WETLAND INVENTORY DATA, (Pre.—Construction) ECOLOGICAL ELEMENTS Wetland Subclasses W Stream or brookside wetland Open fresh water ❑ Non -vegetated subclass Deep Fresh Marsh ❑ Dead Woody ❑ Shrub ❑ Scrub -Shrub ❑ Robust, ❑ Narrow -leaved ❑ Broad-leaved Shallow Fresh Marsh ❑ Robust ❑ Narrow leaved ❑ Broad-leaved ❑ Floatirig-leaved Floodplain/Flats ❑ Emergent ■ Shrubs and Trees Wet Meadow ❑ Ungrazed ❑ Grazed Shrub Swamp ❑ Sapling ❑ Bushy ❑ Compact ❑ Aquatic Wooded Swamp ■ Deciduous ❑ Evergreen Bog ❑ Shrub ❑ Wooded ❑ Cranberry ❑ Moss Fen ❑ Emergent ❑ Shrub SPECIAL ELEMENTS. ❑ Rare and/or Endangered Species ❑ Aquatic Study Area ❑ Sanctuary or Refuge ❑ Wildlife Management Area ❑ Fisheries Management Area ❑ Educational Study Area ❑ Historical Area ❑ Other HYDROGEOLOGICAL ELEMENTS Hydrologic Position of Wetland ❑ Perched Weiland ■ Water Table Wetland ❑ Water/Artesian Wetland ❑ Artesian Weiland Groundwater Relationship ■ Discharge Wetland ❑ Recharge Weiland ❑ Combination Transmissivity of Aquifer rt Low <10,000 gal/day/ft ❑ Moderate 10,000-40,000 gal/day/ft ❑ High >40,000 gal/dayt t Dominant Hydrologic Condition 01 m2 ❑3 04 05 06 Connection by Surface Water to a Riparian System ❑ Yes X No Watershed Land Use ❑ Rural ❑ Rural/Residential ■ Urban ❑ Industrial ❑ Other Water Level Fluctuation ❑ H N L ❑ Vernal Pool Groundwater Outflow from Wetland ❑ Absent ■ Present COMMENTS: Project No. Adams Farm Wetland No. Southern Dominant Wetland Class ■Stream or brookside wetland ❑ Open Fresh Water ❑ Deep Fresh Marsh ❑ Shallow Fresh Marsh ❑ Yearly Floodplain ❑ Wet Meadow ❑ Shrub Swamp ■ Wooded Swamp ❑ Bog ❑ Fen ❑ Other Wetland Class Richness ❑>5 04 ■3 ❑2 ❑1 Subclass Richness ❑ >10 ❑ 9-6 115-4 03-2111 Vegetative interspersion ❑H ■M ❑L Surrounding Habitat 0>90% of 2 or more listed types 1150-90% of 1 or more; 90% of 1 ❑ <50% of 1 or more of listed types Cover Type ❑ 26-75% scattered ❑ 26-75% peripheral ❑ >75% or <25% scattered ■ 100% cover; >75% or <25% peripheral Percent Open Water ■ 0-33% 034-66%1167-95%1196-100% Vegetative Species Richness ❑H ■M 1711- Proportion LProportion of Wildlife Food Plants ❑H ■M ❑L Vegetative Density ❑H ■M ❑L Welland Juxtaposition Favorability ❑H ■M ❑L Inlet ❑A ■P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to welland Outlet ❑A ■P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Outlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Percent Wetlands Bordering Open Water vs. Upland ■ <33% ❑ 34-66% F-167-100% ❑ Does not border Fetch ❑ >2000 ft. ■ <2000 ft. Depth of Pond U Deep >6 ft. A Shallow <6 ft. TOPOGRAPHIC ELEMENTS Topographic Configuration ❑ Closed Basin ■ Semi -closed Basin ❑ Valley ❑ Hillside Size ❑ Large L 4.6 acres) lr Medium (1.1 to 4.5 acres) ❑ Small L 1 acre) Wetland Gradient ■Slight 0-3% ❑ Steep >3% Surrounding Slopes ❑ Slight 0-3% ■ Steep >3% Topographic Position in Watershed ■ Upper ❑ Intermediate ❑ Lower GEOLOGICAL ELEMENTS Surficial Geological Material Underlying Wetland N Till ❑ Alluvium ❑ Stratified Sand and Gravel ❑Stratified Fine Sand and Silt Bedrock Underlying Wetland ■ Igneous and Metamorphic ❑ Sedimentary Soil Type/Permeability ❑ Peat/H ■ Mineral/M ❑ Muck/L Dominant Surficial Geological Material or.Watershed ■ Till ❑ Alluvium ❑ Stratified Sand and Gravel ❑ Stratified Fine Sand and Silt Thickness of Organics ■ <1 foot ❑ 1-5 feet ❑ >5 feet SOCIO-ECONOMIC ELEMENTS Hydrologically Connected to a ❑Small Stream ❑ River ❑ Lake ■ Combination ❑ Not connected Public Access to Wetland ■ Within 100 ft. of road ❑ Access by passable waterway ❑ Isolated Surrounding Population Density ❑ <0.5 personlacre (<3201sq. ml) ❑ 0.5-1.9 p/a (320-1220/sq.mi) p >2 pla (>1220/sq.mi.) Local Scarcity to Nearest Similar Type ■ <200 feet ❑ 201 to 1000 feet ❑ >1000feet Known Crop Value or Potential ■ None ❑ Supports 1 family for part of year Type ❑ Supports viable commercial interest Type Legal Accessibility to Wetland ❑ Public ■ Private ❑ Restricted Cultural Significance ❑ Archaeological/Historic N None Key L Low A Absent M Moderate P Perennial H High E Ephemeral U Unfavorable Ecological Solutions, LLC Apr![ 16, 2007 WETLAND INVENTORY DATA, (Pre —Construction) ECOLOGICAL ELEMENTS Wetland Subclasses ❑ Stream or brookside wetland Open fresh water ■ Non -vegetated subclass Deep Fresh Marsh ❑ Dead Woody ❑ Shrub ❑ Scrub -Shrub ❑ Robust ❑ Narrow -leaved ❑ Broad-leaved Shallow Fresh Marsh ❑ Robust ❑ Narrow -leaved ❑ Broad-leaved ❑ Floating -leaved Floodplain/Flats ❑ Emergent ❑ Shrubs and Trees Wet Meadow ❑ Ungrazed ❑ Grazed Shrub Swamp ❑ Sapling ❑ Bushy ❑ Compact ❑ Aquatic Wooded Swamp ❑ Deciduous ❑ Evergreen Bog ❑ Shrub ❑ Wooded ❑ Cranberry ❑ Moss Fen ❑ Emergent ❑ Shrub SPECIAL ELEMENTS ❑ Rare and/or Endangered Species ❑ Aquatic Study Area ❑ Sanctuary or Refuge ❑ Wildlife Management Area ❑ Fisheries Management Area ❑ Educational Study Area ❑ Historical Area ❑ Other HYDROGEOLOGICAL ELEMENTS Hydrologic Position of Wetland ■ Perched Wetland ■ Water Table Wetland ❑ WatedArtesian Wetland ❑ Artesian Wetland Groundwater Relationship ❑ Discharge Wetland ❑ Recharge Wetland ❑ Combination Transmissivity of Aquifer * Low <10,000 gallday/ft ❑ Moderate 10,000-40,000 gallday/ft ❑ High >40,000 gal/day/ft Dominant Hydrologic Condition 01 02 03 ❑4 ❑5 ❑6 Connection by Surface Water to a Riparian System ❑.Yes ■ No Watershed Land Use ❑ Rural ❑ Rural/Residential ■ Urban ❑ industrial ❑ Other Water Level Fluctuation ❑ H ❑ L ■ Vernal Pool. Groundwater Outflow from Wetland ■ Absent ❑ Present COMMENTS: Dominant Wetland Class ❑Stream or brookside wetland ❑ Open Fresh Water ❑ Deep Fresh Marsh ❑ Shallow Fresh Marsh ❑ Yearly Floodplain ❑ Wet Meadow ■ Shrub Swamp ❑ Wooded Swamp ❑ Bog ❑ Fen Project No. Adams Farm Welland No. Northern ❑ Other Wetland Class Richness 0>5 ❑4 ❑3 ❑2 ■1 Subclass Richness ❑ >10 ❑ 9-6 ❑5-4 03-201 Vegetative interspersion ❑H ■M ❑L Surrounding Habitat 0>90% of 2 .or more listed types ❑ 50-90% of 1 or more; 90% of 1 ❑ <50% of 1 or more of listed types Cover Type ❑ 26-75% scattered 117126-75% peripheral ❑ >75% or <26% scattered ■100% cover; >75% or <25% peripheral Percent Open Water 0 0-33% 034-66%067-95%096-100% Vegetative Species Richness ❑H ■M ❑L Proportion of Wildlife Food Plants ❑H ■M ❑L Vegetative Density ❑H ■M ❑L Welland Juxtaposition Favorability ❑H ■M ❑L Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Iniet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Inlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Outlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Outlet ❑A ❑P ❑E ❑ Present, to wetland Percent Wetlands Bordering Open Water vs. Upland ❑ <33% ■ 34-66% ❑ 67-100% ❑ Does not border Fetch ❑ >2000 ft. ❑ <2000 ft. Depth of Pond ❑ Deep >6 ft. ■ Shallow <6 ft. TOPOGRAPHIC ELEMENTS Topographic Configuration r Closed Basin ❑ Semi -closed Basin ❑ Valley ❑ Hillside Size ❑ Large L 4.6 acres) ❑ Medium, (1.1 to 4.5 acres) ■ Smatl (< 1 acre) Welland Gradient ■Slight 0-3% ❑ Steep >3% Surrounding Slopes ❑ Slight 0-30/6 ■ Steep >3% Topographic Position in Watershed ■ Upper ❑ Intermediate ❑ Lower GEOLOGICAL ELEMENTS Surficial Geological Material Underlying Wetland E Till ❑ Alluvium ❑ Stratified Sand and Gravel ❑Stratified Fine Sand and Silt Bedrock Underlying Wetland ❑ Igneous and Metamorphic ❑ r Sedimentary Soil Type/Permeability ❑ PeatlH ■ Mineral/M ■ Muck/L Dominant Surficial Geological Material or Watershed ■ Till ❑ Alluvium ❑ Stratified Sand and Gravel ❑ Stratified Fine Sand and Silt Thickness of Organics ❑ <1 foot Z 1-5 feet ❑ >5 feet SOCIO-ECONOMIC ELEMENTS Hydrologically Connected to a ❑Small Stream ❑ River ❑ Lake ❑ Combination ■ Not connected Public Access to Wetland ❑ Within 100 ft. of road ❑ Access by passable waterway ■ Isolated Surrounding Population Density ❑ <0.5 person/acre (<320/sq. mi) ❑ 0.5-1,9 pla (320-1220/sq.mi) ■ >2 p/a (>12201sq.mi.) Local Scarcity to Nearest Similar Type . ❑ X200 feet ❑ 201 to 1000 feet ❑ >1000 feet Known Crop Value or Potential E None ❑ Supports 1 family for part of year Type ❑ Supports viable commercial interest Type Legal Accessibility to Wetland ❑ Public ■ Private ❑ Restricted Cultural Significance ❑ Archaeological/Historic ■ None Key L Low A Absent M Moderate P Perennial H High E Ephemeral U Unfavorable Ecological Solutions, LLC April Ib, 2007 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 152 Old Post Road 154 Old Post Road vo 158.-164 Old Post Road Town Of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York Conrad Geoscience Corp. is submitting this report for work performed at the above - referenced site. This report has been prepared in conformance with the scope and limitations ASTM Standard E-1527-05, Standard Practice for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Property Transactions. If you have any questions or comments, please contact one of the individuals listed below. We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of environmental professional as defined in 40 CFR Part 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Andria D. Quinn Geologist/Preparer Christopher B. Brown, CPG Senior Hydrogeologist TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 1.1 Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................1 2.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................................3 2.1 Objectives...........................................................................:....................................3 2.2 Scope and Limitations of Report .............................................................................3 2.3 Significant Assumptions........... ............... .... ...............................................3 2.4 Special Terms and Conditions.... .................................................... ........................ 3 2.5 User Reliance...........................................................................................................3 3.0 Site Description........:.............................................................................................:............4 3.1 Subject Property Location..............................:........................................................4 3.2 Site Features, Characteristics and Current Operations............................................4 3.3 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ....................................... .I................... .4 4.0 Database Search ........................................... .................................................................. ....... 5 4.1 State and Federal Hazardous Waste Sites - NPL, CERC.LIS, SHWS, HSWDS ....5 4.2 Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or.Disposal - RCRA TSD and RCRA CA .6 4.3 Hazardous Waste Generation - SQG, LQG.............................................................6 4.4 State Permitted Landfills/S.olid'Waste Disposal Sites - LF/S WF ............................ 6 4.5 Petroleum Bulk Storage -.PBS, Chemical Bulk Storage - CBS .............................6 i 4.6 Petroleum and Hazardous Material Releases - ERNS, SPILLS, LRST .................. 7 4.7 Brownfzelds Sites............................................................................................ 9 4.8 Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites - VCP................................................................ 9 4.9 Engineering Controls, Institutional Controls, and Activity and Use Limitations .10 4.10 Environmental Liens................................................................................:.......:.....10 5.0 Physical Setting Analysis and Property History ................................................. .. .....11 5.1 7.5Minute USGS Topographic Map.....................................................................11 5.2 Bedrock Geology..................................................................................................11 5.3 Surficiaf Geology.................................................................................................11 5.4 Regional Hydrogeology.....................................................................................11 6.0 Property History................................................................................................ ............12 6.1 General Property History and Use........................................................................12 6.2 Property Ownership .........................................._.........................................12 I......... 6.3 Historical Topographic Maps...............................................................................13 6.4 Aerial Photographs................................................................................................13 6.5 Sanborn Fixe Insurance Maps................................................................................13 6.6 City Directory Abstract.........................................................................................13 7,0 Site Inspection and Interviews...........................................................................................14 7.1 General Site Observations ..................................................................................14 7.2 Hazardous and Regulated Substances...................................................................14 7.3 Storage Tanks.....................................................................................................14 7.4 PCBs......................................................................................................................14 7.5 Solid Waste................................................................... ...14 CONRAD GEoscrENCE CORP. 1 7.6 Septic System Appendix B 7.7 .....................................................................................................15 Odors.....................................................................................................................15 Records Review Report 7.8 Pools of Liquid......................................................................................................15 Appendix E 7.9 Drums...............................................................................................................15 Scope and Limitations of Report 7.10 Petroleum Products Containers.............................................................................15 Appendix H 7.11 Unidentified Substance Containers.......................................................................15 '7.12 Pits, Ponds, or. Lagoons ....................................................................................15 7.13 Stained Soil or Pavement........................................................................... 7.14 Stressed Vegetation...............................................................................................15 7.15 Waste Water................................................................:......................................16 7.16 Wells......................................................................................................................16 7.17 Other Conditions of Concern.................................................................................16 7.18 Out of Scope Items................................................................................................16 7.19 Interviews.................................................................:............................................16 8.0 Findings and Conclusions.................................................................................................17 8.1 Phase 11 ESA Findings...........................................................................................17 APPENDICES Appendix A Site Location Map Appendix B Site Features Map Appendix C Records Review Report Appendix D Site Photographs Appendix E Qualifications Appendix F Scope and Limitations of Report Appendix G References and Sources Appendix H Phase 1I ESA Report Com Goosci NCE CO". Adams -- Phase I ESA ##AW07QQ10 February°23, 2007 Page 1 1.0 Executive Summary Conrad Geoscience personnel have conductedd-a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with ASTM Standard E-1527-05 for the subject property, identified as 152, 154, and 158-164 Old Post Road, Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property, except for the following: Conrad Geoscience identified a, substantial amount of solid waste in the area east of the residence at 158 Old Post Road. This area has been.used as storage for an automobile repair and salvage operation by the current owner. The total area used for this operation is approximately 0.5acre. Solid waste consists mainly of automotive debris (engines, tires and rims, automobile gasoline tanks, empty 55 -gallon drums). 2. Conrad Geoscience identified two areas along the northern and southern property boundaries where fill material was deposited. Based on observations during the Phase I site inspection and the operating history of the subject property, Conrad Geoscience conducted a limited Phase II investigation to determine if site operations in and around the subject property resulted in soil or. groundwater contamination. The complete Phase II ESA report is attached as Appendix H, and discussed briefly below. 1.1 Conclusions and Recommendations Results of the Phase H investigation suggest that shallow surface soil (0-12") in the vicinity of surficial solid waste contains low concentrations of metals and semi -volatile organic. compounds. Following removal of the waste, we recommend analysis, excavation, and relocation/disposal of affected soil. Future development plans could also incorporate remedial efforts. Parking areas, or other impervious site features, can be strategically placed over areas which may be contaminated, effectively "capping" any impacted soil. This would prevent future contact with contaminants and infiltration of surface water which might normally mobilize contaminants. 2. Soil samples collected from the surface of the two fill areas contained no detectable volatile or semi -volatile organic compounds, however, they may not be representative of subsurface soil quality in other areas within the fill. The fill area along the northern property boundary does not appear to extend onto the subject property and is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition. The exact location of the southern property boundary in relation to fill material is currently not known. A significant portion of the fill may be within the boundary of the subject property, and the fill material has not been completely characterized. We the recommend the property boundary be defined, and the character of the fill be determined to evaluate impacts to the subject property. CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Adams --- Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page. 2 r 3. 'Surface water samples collected from wetlands nearby and down -gradient of fill areas contained no detectable volatile organic compounds. This is an indication that,leachate from fill areas has not affected wetland quality. 4. On February 7, 2007, supply well samples were collected from the residences at 158 and 164 Old Post Road. The wells were purged for approximately 15 minutes in order to draw representative formation water in the wells. Results indicate that these wells have not been affected by past onsite operations or off-site spills, or the nearby State -Listed Hazardous Waste Disposal Site (former Greer Toyota). Com GEoscMNCE COPP. Adams — Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23; 2007 Page 3 . 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Objectives This Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is intended to identify recognized environmental conditions with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products on the subject property (defined in section 3.0). The term recognized environmental conditions is defined in accordance with ASTM E 1527-05 Standard Practice of Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Real Estate Transactions as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property (ASTM2005). 2.2 Scope and Limitations of Report Conrad Geoscience conducted a visual inspection'of the subject property, a review of regulatory records and documents, and a review of historical records and documents in accordance with ASTM E 1527-05 and the appended Scope and Limitations (Appendix F). 2.3 Significant Assumptions Conrad Geoscience assumes that all database records, historical information, and interviews conducted regarding -the subject property are from reliable sources. No attempt was made to verify the reliability of said sources, as it is not required to verify the information provided according to Section 7.5.2.1. of ASTM E 1527-05. Conclusions and recommendations in Section 8.0 are based on information obtained from said sources and a visual inspection of the subject property. References and sources used for the preparation of this report may be viewed in Appendix G. 2.4 Special Terms and Conditions There were no special terms or conditions applied for the preparation of this report, or additional services requested by the user, except that Phase 11 investigation results be reported along with the Phase I ESA (Appendix H). 2.5 User Reliance Conrad Geoscience has prepared this Phase I ESA for Adams Fairacre Farms. This report provides an assessment of the presence of regulated or hazardous materials, as defined by CERCLA, and an evaluation of.any recognized environmental conditions. Adams Fairacre Farms is authorized to rely on the contents of this Phase I ESA. CONRAD GEasCIENCE CORP. Adams — Phase l ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 4 �! 3,0 Site Description 3.1 Subject Property Location The subject property consists of three parcels located at 152, 154 and 158-164 Old Post Road in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York (Figure 1), on the eastern side of Old Post Road. The subject.property is further defined on Dutchess County and Town of Wappinger Tax. Maps as. Lot #614375 (#152, 0.27 acres); Lot #649374 (#154,3.54 acres); and Lot 4649335 (#158-164,9.03, acres). 3.2 Site Features, Characteristics and Current Operations The subject property is approximately 12.8 -acres in area and current use is mixed residential and commercial. Driveways located on the eastern side of Old Post Road provide access to the parcels. The western portion of the property along Old Post Road contains improvements. (houses and garages), and the eastern portion of the property remains undeveloped, wooded and swampy. The southernmost parcel, 158-164 Old Post Road, contains two residences; 154 Old Post Road contains one residence; and 152 Old Post Road contains one commercial building (formerly residential) which is occupied by a real estate office and lawyers office. The subject property isnot supplied by municipal water or sewer. 152, 154, 158 and 164 Old Post Road each contain a private supply well and private septic system with a leach held. 3.3 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties The adjacent properties to the east are residential. Adjacent properties to the north are residential (homeowner operates a towing service) and commercial (Friendly Mercedes dealership). There is an area of fill on the Friendly Mercedes property that may encroach onto the subject property. Adjacent properties to the west, across Old Post Road and Route 9, are a car dealership and'tire shop. The adjacent property to the south (1.234 Route 9) consists of a multi -use commercial. building, which operates ERA Realty, and The Water Source, which provides water conditioning, testing, filtration and treatment services. Also adjacent to the subject property, to the south, are The Brake Shop (1228 Route 9) and Frank Bros. Auto Body (1222 Route 9). There is an area of fill on the Frank Bros. property that may encroach onto the subject property. CONRAD GEoscEENcE CORP, Adams -- Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 5 4.0 Database Search A review of state and federal documents and databases was performed to identify recorded hazardous waste or regulated substance activities on or near -the subject property. Information from state and federal databases was compiled by Environmental Data Resources (EDR), an independent subcontractor to Conrad Geoscience Corp. The information presented below is a summary of this report. A complete listing of the sources searched and a complete .copy of the database report are provided in Appendix C. The search distances as assigned in ASTM E 1527-05 were used for each of the following environmental record sources. 4.1 Federal and State Hazardous Waste Sites - NPL, CERCLIS, SHWS, HSWDS National Priority List (NPL) The subject property is not listed with the USEPA as a National Priority Listing (NPL) hazardous waste disposal site. No NPL sites were identified within 1.0 mile of the subject property. There were no proposed or delisted NPL sites identified. within 0.5 mile of the subject property. Comprehensive Environmental. Response Compensation & Liability information System (CERCLIS) The subject property is not listed on the USEPA CERCLIS list, which details proposed and existing federal Superfund sites, or on the CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) list. There, were no CERCLIS or CERCLIS NFRAP sites located within 0.5 mile of the. subject property. State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) The subject property is not listed with NYSDEC as an inactive hazardous waste disposal site (SAWS). One SHWS and one delisted SHWS were identified within 1.0 mile of the subject property: Greer Toyota (aka Wappingers Toyota), located at 1420 Route 9 approximately 0,5 mile north of the subject property, is listed as both a SHWS and a delisted SHWS, Site Code ID 9314088. Waste solvents and oils from the service facility entered floor drains and an oil -water separator, which discharged into a diMser system that acted as a leach field. The contaminants of concern included tetrachloroethene; 1,1,1 -trichloroethane; and trichloroethene. In 1992, contamination was discovered in three nearby private wells and filters were installed. In 2000, two waste oil tanks were removed from the site. A Remedial Investigation was completed in November 2001, a record of Decision was issued in March 2002, and a soil -vapor extraction (SVE) system was installed in February 2004. Greer maintains the filtration systems on the private wells and the SVE system is still operating. The site is currently listed as "properly closed," but requires continued management. Considering the distance to the Greer Toyota site, and the'status of 'site remediation, it is unlikely that this site represents a threat to the subject property.. In addition, Greer Toyota is topographically down -gradient of the subject property. CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CCRP. 3� Adams — Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23,1007 Page 6 Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site Inventory (HSWDS) The subject property is not listed on New York State HSWDS Inventory. There were no HSWDSs identified within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 4.2 Hazardous Waste Treatment,. Storage, or Disposal - RCRA TSD and RCRA CA RCRA Treatment Storage Disposal (TSD) Neither the subject property nor properties within 0.5 mile of the subject property are registered with state or federal agencies for.treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials. RCRA Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) The subject property is not listed with the USEPA RCRA Corrective Action program, which lists those facilities permitted by the USEPA for treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which have conducted or are currently conducting a corrective action as regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. There were no CORRACTS facilities identified within. l.0 mile of the subject property. 4.3 Hazardous Waste Generation - RCRA SQG and LQG The subject. property is not listed with the USEPA as a Large Quantity Generator (LQG) or Small Quantity Generator (SQG) of hazardous waste. There.were no LQGs or SQGs identified in the EDR database search within 0.125 mile of the subject property. Although not identified by EDR; two known SQGs, Lee Myles Transmissions (124 Old Post Road) and Amerada Hess (1237 Route 9), are located within 0.125 mile of the subject property. Vic's Auto Service, a former automotive repair facility, operated on the subject property at 158 Old Post Road. This property was not listed with the USEPA as a generator of hazardous waste. 4.4 State Permitted Landfills (LF)/Solid Waste Disposal Sites (SW +� Neither the subject property nor properties within 0.5 mile of the subject property are listed with NYSDEC as a solid waste facility (SWF) or landfill (LF). 4.5 Petroleum Bulk Storage - PBS The subject property is not listed with NYSDEC as a PBS facility. Three PBS facilities were identified within 0.125 mile of the subj ect property, and are listed below. Details .of these facilities can be reviewed in Appendix C. Underground Storage Tank (UST) Facilities: • Ashley Gardens, 1229 Route 9, south of the subject property, PBS #3-600806. CONRAD GEOSGmqcE CORP.WE Adams — Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Mage 7 Lee Myles Transmissions, 124 Old Post Road, northwest of the subject property, PBS #3=600832. Above Ground Storage Tank (AST) Facilities: Exxon/Mobil Oil, 1277 Route 9, northwest of the subject property, PBS #3- 048011 4,6 Petroleum and Hazardous Material Releases - ERNS, SPILLS, LRST Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) The subject property is not listed within the USEPA Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS), which stores information reported to the USEPA on sudden and/or accidental releases of hazardous substances to the environment. NYSDEC Spills Database (SPILLS) The subject property is not listed on the NYSDEC database of petroleum spills. Four SPILLS sites were identified within 0.125 mile of the subject property, and are discussed below. Additional details can be reviewed in Appendix C. NYSDEC Spill #9707327, located at Hess Gas Station #32332, 1237 Route 9, southwest of the subject property, was reported on September 19, 1997, when 7 gallons of gasoline spilled onto the concrete due to human error while refueling. Corrective action was taken and NYSDEC closed the spill file on September 22, 1997, NYSDEC Spill #9612160, located at the Dunham residence, 16A McFarland Road, southeast of the subject property, was reported. on January 9, 1997,. when an unknown quantity of #2 heating oil was released to due tank failure. The tank was removed and NYSDEC closed the spill file on January 17, 1997, NYSDEC Spill #0405650, located at ExxowMobil Oil, 1277 Route 9, northwest of the subject property, was reported on August 22, 2004, when an unknown quantity of gasoline was released due to equipment failure. A feed line had failed, spilling gasoline into a sump. The spill was contained and the leaky line was repaired. NYSDEC closed the spill file on October 1, 2004. NYSDEC Spill 4941303 8, located at the Robinson residence, 19 Beechwood Circle, north of the subject property, was reported on December 29, 1994, when: an oily sheen was observed on standing water near a drain pipe. NYSDEC inspected the drain and water and reported the sheen as a biological growth. NYSDEC closed the spill file on January 17, 1995. Com GEoscl CE CORP. Adams - Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 8 0. j NYSDEC Leaking Registered Storage Tanks (LRST) The subject property is not listed on the NYSDEC. database of leaking registered storage tanks (LRSTs). Eleven sites within 0.5 mile of the subject property are on file with NYSDEC as having a leaking registered storage tank, and are discussed below. Additional details can be reviewed in Appendix C. NYSDEC Spill 40004187, located at the Scott residence, 25 Beechwood Circle, 921 feet north of the subject property, was reported on July 7, 2000, when 50 gallons of 42 fuel oil spilled due to failure of a 275 -gallon aboveground tank. Ira D. Conklin conducted a cleanup, but some residue remained in the basement. 200 gallons of product were pumped from the tank, filling four 55 -gallon drums. Sorbent material was applied to the basement to soak up remaining product. The tank was removed and replaced., NYSDEC conducted a site inspection in April 2005; and reported that there were no odors or signs of contamination present. NYSDEC requested that a supply well sample be collected, and spill closure is pending analytical results. This spill is not considered to represent an environmental concern to the subj ect property. NYSDEC Spill 49007767, located at Car Life Transmissions, 1197 Route 9, 975 feet southwest of the subject property, was reported on October 16, 1990, when contaminated soil was encountered during removal of a gasoline tank. The tank and contaminated soil were removed and NYSDEC closed the spill file on October 24, 1990. NYSDEC Spill 40505971, located at the Palmatier residence, 102 Old Post Road, 557 feet northwest of the subject property, was reported on August 15, 2005, when #2 heating oil spilled due to equipment failure of an aboveground storage tank. The tank was drained and removed, and soil under the tank was found to be affected. The contaminated soil was excavated and disposed of and a new tank was installed. NYSDEC closed the spill file on October 24, 2005. NYSDEC Spill 40110854, located at the Palmatier residence at 102 Old Post Road, 557 feet northwest of the subject property, was reported on February 13, 2002, when 1 gallon of #2 heating oil spilled due to overfilling. Corrective action was taken by the responsible party and NYSDEC closed the spill file on February 20, 2002. NYSDEC Spill 49100701, located at 7-I1, 1336 Route 9, 1,301 feet northwest of the subject property, was reported on April 17, 1991, when gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs) failed tightness tests. The tanks passed a retest on April 23, 1991 and NYSDEC closed the spill file on July 30, 1992. NYSDEC Spill 48800128, located at Getty Petroleum, 145 Route 9 (currently 1499 Route 9), 1,402 feet north of the subject property, was reported on April 5, 1988, when a 10,000 - gallon UST failed a tightness test. The tank was 'uncovered and retested, and passed the retest. NYSDEC closed the spill file on June 27, 1988. NYSDEC Spill 49105963, located at Getty Petroleum, 145 Route 9 (currently Lukoil, 1499 Route 9), 1,402 feet north of the subject property, was reported on September 3, 1991, CONRAD GEOSCIENCB CORP. Adams — Phase 1 ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 9 when an UST failed a tightness test. Contamination was discovered, and monitoring wells were installed and monitored on a quarterly basis. This spill was closed by NYSDEC on April 28,, 2005, and ongoing remedial actions are being carried out under Spill #0501208.. Spill 90501208 was reported on April 28, 2005, but is not listed in the database report. NYSDEC lists this spill as "open" on their website. The webpage was. printed, and is attached in Appendix C. This site is sufficiently distanct from and topographically down -gradient of the subject property, and is not considered to represent an environmental concern. NYSDEC Spill #9106218, located at Getty Petroleum, 145 Route 9 (currently Lukoil, 1499 Route- 9), 1,402 feet north of the subject property, was reported on September 10, 1991, when an UST failed a tightness test again. Contamination was discovered, the tank was removed, and monitoring wells were installed and monitored on a quarterly basis, This spill was closed by NYSDEC on January 27, 1992, and ongoing remedial actions are being carried out under Spill #0501208, discussed above. NYSDEC'Spill #9012435, located at the service station at the intersection of Route 9 and Old Hopewell Road, 1,810 feet northwest of the subject property.. was reported on March 4, 1991, when a diesel UST at an abandoned gasoline station failed a tightness test. The tank was removed and NYSDEC closed the spill filo on July 15, 1992. . NYSDEC Spill #0008342, located at Wappingers Toyota, 1420 Route 9, approximately 0.5 mile north of the subject property, was reported on October 12, 2000, when a hole was discovered in a waste oil tank. Contaminated soil was excavated and stockpiled. NYSDEC closed the spill file on October 17, 2000. NYSDEC Spill #051.3075, located at the Alpine Commons parking lot, 1357 Route 9, 0.5 anile north of the subject property, was reported on February 11, 2006, when oil originating from a vehicle was observed in the parking lot. NYSDEC investigated and closed the spill file on February 13, 2006: NYSDEC Spill #9504487, located at the residence at. 10 Curry Road, 0.5 mile northwest of the subject property, was reported on July 14, 1995, when 1 gallon of #2 heating oil spilled due to.tank overfilling. Corrective action was taken by the responsible party and NYSDEC closed the spill file on February 13, 2006. 4.7 Brownfield Sites A Brownfield is any real property where redevelopment or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous waste, petroleum, pollutants, or contaminants. The subject property is not listed with NYSDEC as a Brownfield site. No Brownfield sites were identified with 0.5 mile of the subject property. 4.8 Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) Sites The VCP was established to address the environmental, legal and financial barriers that hinder redevelopment and reuse of contaminated sites, and to enhance private sector cleanup of Com GEoscxwcf, CORP. rA Adams — Phase T ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2'007 Page 110 . Brownfield. sites by enabling patties to remediate using private rather than public finds. The subject property is not listed with NYSDEC as a VCP site. No VCP sites were identified within 0.5 mile of the subject property. 4.9 Engineering Controls, Institutional. Controls and Activity and Use Limitations Conrad Geoscience identified no engineering controls, institutional controls or AULs in association with the subject property. 4.10 Environmental Liens Conrad Geoscience identified no environmental liens in association with the three parcels which make up the subject property. The environmental liens report is provided in Appendix C. CoNRAn Gwscw,vcF CoRp. Adams — Phase I ESA ##AW0700I0 February 23, 2'007 Page I I 5.0 Physical Setting Analysis The physical setting of the subject property was evaluated by consulting regional bedrock geology snaps, topographic maps, and information pertaining to regional hydrogeology. Following, is a summary of this review. 5.1 7.5 Minute USGS Topographic Map According to the Wappingers Falls, New York, USGS topographic map, the subject property is approximately 230-250 feet above mean sea level. 5.2 Bedrock Geology According to the Lower Hudson Sheet of the Geologic Map of New York and USGS data, bedrock underlying the subject property is the mid -Cambrian Austin Glen Formation, consisting of shale and greywacke. During our Phase II investigation (Appendix I), bedrock was encountered in every soil boring, at depths ranging from 17. inches below land surface (bls) to 6 feet bls. 5.3 Surficial Geology According to the Lower Hudson sheet of the Surficial Geologic Map of New York, unconsolidated glacial till, consisting of fine-grained silty, clayey loam; and lacustrian silt and clay, overlies bedrock. 5.4 Regional Hydrogeology Based on site topography and USGS well data local groundwater is presumed to flow toward the west-southwest. Regionally; groundwater is presumed to flow toward the Hudson River (to the west). Corte GEoscENCE CORP. MI Adams — Phase T ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 12 6.0 Property History The history of the subject property and surrounding area was researched through a review of readily ascertainable standard historical sources. These sources may include current and past owners, property records, recorded land title records, property tax files; building department records and/or zoning & land use records. This review was conducted in order to identify those uses that are likely to have led to recognized environmental conditions. Following, is a summary of these findings. Documentation pertaining to the aforementioned records review is on file with Conrad Geoscience, and references are in Appendix G, 6.1 General Property History and Use Historical topographic maps and a 1970 aerial photograph show the subject property as having improvements as early as 1900. According to property records, the first improvement was the -house at #158, built in 1850. The houses at 152 and 154 Old Post Road were built in 1930, and #164 was built in 1938. The garages at #152 and 158 were built in the,mid-1950s. The subject property has historically been residential, with the exception of #152, which was converted to commercial offices in the mid-1980s, Victor Owen, owner of the 158-164 parcel, operated Vic's Service from his garage in the 1970s and 1980s, conducting automotive repairs and providing a towing service. There are large quantities of solid waste on the property from operations at #158. 6.2 Property Ownership Property ownership history was researched through the propertyshark.com website,.the environmental liens report, Wappinger Town Hall property records and current owners. .'Previous property owners and the approximate date of purchase are listed below: 152 Old Post Road Owner/Tenant: Approximate Date of Purchase Andrew Rankin October 1951 Percy W. Briscoe November 1986 154 Old Post Road Owner/Tenant: Approximate Date of purchase William Montgomery 1958 John Campbell July 1973 John & Josephine Campbell October 1976 Joseph & Cheryl Meditz April 1978 Joseph .& Friedericke Meditz April 1979 George & Florence Mattison November 1985 Florence E. Mattison April 1994 C Adams — Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007- Page 007Page 13 ' 158-164 Old Post Road Owner/Tenant: Approximate Date of Purchase Frank & Victor Byrne unknown Frank Ammelounx December 1956 Victor & Jacqueline Owen April 1977 6.3 Historical Topographic Maps Conrad Geoscience reviewed historical USGS topographic maps -from 1903, 1943, 1947, 1956 and 1981. No evidence of any recognized environmental conditions was observed during this review. The maps are attached in Appendix C. 6.4 Aerial Photographs There was no Aerial Photograph coverage for the subject property provided in the database report. Conrad Geoscience reviewed an aerial photograph from the Dutchess Real Property Tax Office dated 1970. In the photo; buildings which likely correlate to current structures on the subject property are visible. The adjacent property to the north appears to be residential, with a few small buildings and driveways visible. The properties to the east and south also appear to be residential. The photo, scaled at approximately 1":400', is on file with Conrad Geoscience and available upon request. 6.5 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps There was no Sanborn Fire Insurance Map coverage for the subject property, 6.6 City Directory Abstract The city directory abstract lists telephone company records of past occupants and businesses of an address by years, and is reviewed to determine if past occupants and businesses of the subject property and adjacent properties -may have led to recognized environmental conditions. There was no City Directory coverage for the subject property. CONRAD GEOSCMNCE CORP. rA" Adams — Phase r ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 14 7.0 Site Inspection and Interviews Conrad Geoscience personnel inspected the subject property on January 15, 2007. On the day of inspection, Victor Owen, current owner and occupant of 158-164 Old Post Road, provided access to the property and was interviewed during the site inspection. 7.1 General Site Observations Old Post Road is accessed from the northbound side of Route 9, and runs roughly parallel to Route 9. The subject properties are accessed via driveways on Old Post Road. The western portion of the property, along Old Post Road, contains improvements {houses, garages), and the eastern portion of the property remains undeveloped and swampy. 152 Old Post Road is the northernmost parcel, and is improved with a commercial building (former residence), garage, driveway and parking area, 154 Old Post Road, adjacent.to and south of #152, contains a house, garage, driveway and parking area, 158 Old Post Road, adjacent to and south of #154, is improved with a residence, garage and outbuildings (formerly used for auto repair and salvage), driveway and parking area. Approximately one acre of land behind #158 is currently a scrap and salvage yard, and contains large quantities of solid waste from former auto repair operations. 164 Old Post Road is the southernmost residence, improved with a house, pool, and parking area. Solid waste (box truck, drum, debris) was also observed behind #164. Site inspection photos are provided in Appendix D. 7.2 Hazardous and Regulated Substances . Conrad Geoscience observed several drums and containers labeled as hazardous or regulated substances. However, all containers were empty on the day of inspection, and there was no evidence of leakage. 7.3 Storage Tanks One 275 -gallon heating oil aboveground storage tank (AST) was identified at the 152 Old Post Road residence. One 275 -gallon heating oil AST is present at 154 Old Post Road, the realtor's office. Three 275 -gallon heating oil ASTs are present at the 158 Old Post Road residence. One 275 -gallon heating oil AST is present at the 164 Old Post Road residence, 7.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Conrad Geoscience identified no potential sources of PCBs at this site. 7.5 Solid Waste There are large quantities of solid waste on the property, concentrated in an area of approximately 0.5 acre, east of the 158 Old Post Road residence. Solid waste included scrap ' metal, wood, abandoned automobiles and automobile parts (tires, rims, engines, automobile gasoline tanks, etc.), 20 -pound propane tanks, lawn mowers and parts, boats, lawn furniture, Adams — Phase 7 ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 15 drums and debris, Solid waste (box truck, drum, debris) was also observed east of 164 Old Post Road. 7.6 Septic System The. subject properties have private septic systems and leach fields. 7.7 Odors No odors were identified during the site inspection. 7.8 Pools of Liquid No pools of liquid were identified during the site inspection. 7.9 Drums Conrad Geoscience identified several empty, 55- and 30 -gallon drums in the solid waste area east of the 158 Old Post Road residence. 7.10 Petroleum. Products Containers Conrad Geoscience observed several drums and containers labeled as petroleum products (lubricating oil, transmission fluid, etc). However, all containers identified by Conrad Geoscience were empty on the day of inspection, and there was no evidence of leakage. 7.11 Unidentified Substance Containers No containers of unidentified substances were observed during the site inspection. 7.12 Pits, Ponds or Lagoons No pits or lagoons were observed during the site inspection. There are wetland ponds in northern and southern sections of the property. . 7.13 Stained Soil or Pavement Minor soil staining was observed in solid waste disposal areas. 7.14 Stressed Vegetation Minor stressed vegetation was observed in solid waste disposal areas. CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Iii Adams — Phase 1 ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 16. . i 7.1.5 Waste Water No waste water was observed during the site inspection. 7,16 Wells The subject property utilizes private supply wells, No monitoring wells were observed. 7.17 Other Conditions of Concern .Two areas of fill were observed on adjacent properties along the northern and southern property boundaries. During our Phase 11 investigation, soil samples were collected from the edge of the fill and from down-slope of the fill. Surface water samples were also collected from nearby, down -gradient wetland areas. Sample results indicate that the fill contained no detectable volatile or semi -volatile organic compounds, however those samples may not be representative of soil quality in other areas within the fill. The fill'along the northern boundary does not appear to enter the subject property, and is.not considered to represent a threat. However, a significant portion of the southern fill area may be within the boundary of the subject property, and the contents of that fill material remain uncharacterized. 7.18 Out of Scope Items Radon, mold, lead-based paint and asbestos surveys are out of the scope of this report. Although there was no evidence of the above -referenced items observed during the site inspection or identified during the records review, the only way to confirm the presence or absence of these items is to conduct surveys specific to each item. 7.19 Interviews On January 15, 2007, Conrad Geoscience personnel conducted an interview with Victor Owen, the current owner of 158-164 Old Post Road, in person during the site inspection. Mr: Owen provided information pertaining to the location of utility lines, septic systems, wellheads, and property use. On January 15, 2007, Conrad Geoscience personnel conducted an interview with Pat Adams, prospective buyer of the subject property, in person during the site inspection. On February 2, 2007, Conrad Geoscience personnel conducted a second interview with Victor Owen, over the phone. Mr. Owen provided information pertaining to current and past site. operations, and ownership history. On February 12, 2007, Conrad Geoscience personnel conducted an interview with Vince McCabe or NYSDEC Region 3, in person. Mr. McCabe provided information pertaining to open spill files in the vicinity of the subject property (spill records, remedial actions, current site status). ( A Adams — Phase I ESA #AW070010 February 23, 2007 Page 17 8.0 Findings and Conclusions Conrad Geoscience personnel have conducted a'Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with ASTM Standard E-1527-05 for the subject property, identified as 152, 154, and 158-164 Old Post Road, Town of Wapp:inger, Dutchess County, -New York. Any exceptions to, or deletions from., this practice are described in Section 2 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property, except for the following: Conrad Geoscience identified a substantial amount of solid waste in the area east of the residence at 15 8 Old Post. Road. This area has been used as storage for an automobile repair and salvage operation by the current owner. The total area used for this operation is approximately 0.5 acre. Solid waste consists mainly of automotive debris (engines, tares and rims, automobile gasoline tanks, empty 55 - gallon drums), 2. Conrad Geoscience identified two areas along the northern and southern property boundaries where fill material was deposited. Based on observations during the Phase I site inspection and the operating history of the subject property, Conrad Geoscience conducted a limited Phase H investigation to determine if site operations in, and around the subject property resulted in soil or groundwater contamination. The complete Phase Il ESA report is attached as Appendix H, and discussed briefly below.. 8.1 PHASE II ESA FINDINGS. Results of the Phase II investigation suggest that shallow surface soil (0-12") in the vicinity of surficial solid waste contains low concentrations of metals and semi -volatile organic compounds. Following removal of the waste, we recommend analysis, excavation, and relocation/disposal of affected soil. Soil samples collected from the surface of the two fill areas contained no detectable volatile or semi -volatile organic compounds, however, they may not be representative of subsurface soil quality in other areas within the fill. The fill area along the northern property boundary does not appear to extend onto the subject property and is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition. The exact location of the southern property boundary in relation to fill mate7rial is currently not known. A significant portion of the fill maybe within the boundary of the subject property, and the fill material has not been completely characterized. We recommend further investigation of the character of the fill to evaluate impacts to the subject property. Surface water samples collected from wetlands nearby and down -gradient of fill areas contained no detectable volatile organic compounds. This is an indication that leachate from fill areas has not affected wetland quality. Adams - Phase T ESA #AW076010 February 23, 2007 Page 18 On February 7, 2007, supply well samples were collected from the residences at 158 and 164 Old Post Road. The wells were purged for approximately 15 minutes in order to draw representative formation water in the wells. Results indicate that these wells have not been affected by past on-site operations or off-site spills, or the nearby State -Listed Hazardous Waste Disposal Site (former Greer Toyota). Com GEOSCMNCF CORP. APPENDIX A SITE LOCATION MAP APPENDIX B SITE FEATURES MAP #1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY a Scale in Feet as 40 ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE �— ) G oNRAD N GEOSCZENCE 04- CORP. One Clvlc Colder Nam, Poughkeepsie, NOW York f2601 Figure 2 SELECTED SITE FEATURES MAP 1 By: IADO 1129101 d By. ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SITE BY- ADQ 00/07 952-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, NY d By- CBs 1129107 AW070010 KEY LOT #649374 PARCEL NUMBER #164 HOUSE NUMBER FILLLAREA APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF FILL MATERIAL GEOPROBE SOIL OG&1 BORING LOCATION HA -4 HANDAUGER SAMPLE LOCATION PW -2 SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION a Scale in Feet as 40 ALL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE �— ) G oNRAD N GEOSCZENCE 04- CORP. One Clvlc Colder Nam, Poughkeepsie, NOW York f2601 Figure 2 SELECTED SITE FEATURES MAP 1 By: IADO 1129101 d By. ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SITE BY- ADQ 00/07 952-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, NY d By- CBs 1129107 AW070010 APPENDIX C RECORDS REVIEW REPORT EDR Historical Topographic Map Report 154 Old Post Road 1.54 Old- Post Road _ Wapingers, NY 12590 Inquiry Number: 183758.4 January 09, 2007 EDR® Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Rd Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report Includes a search of a collection of public and private calor historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s, Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resouroes, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage Information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser.acbepts this Report AS 1S. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes prbvided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice - Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanbom and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. I Historical Topographic Map +,�f � �? ri i�`i ids �' � :•' � 4,f - ` '� .. l' ' I, Fila, ' . a 4 r} r, ,fin, - f ,,I•�' �, t} ` ° '` f'IF /!r'i �•f fx^fuy % } Pt r SM �fJ !� i � l� I��r����1f-'F �� r n'. 5 � P _tl , �' ✓r v >rr�1 j 11 l i C / r ` 61� v 4A C- .%�"+ � � - r � 'Sr .- ✓,�-:t� it - _ TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: 154 Old Post Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscience Corporation N NAME: POUGHKEEPSIE ADDRESS: 454 Old Post Road CONTACT: Andria Quinn MAP YEAR: 1903 Wapingers., NY 12590 INQUIRY#: 1831758A LAT/LONG: 41.573417,3.9085 RESEARCH DATE: 01/09/2007 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:62540 i Historical Topographic Map k\ luVi}l� � . '!; 1- ! N TARGET QUAD NAME: POUGHKEEPS[E SITE NAME: 154 Old Post Roar! ADDRESS: 154 Old Post Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscience Corporation CONTACT: Andria Quinn MAP YEAR: 1943 Wapingers, NY 12590 INQUIRY#: 1831758.4 i LATILONG: 41.5734173.9085 RESEARCH DATE: 01/09/2007 1 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:62500 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: 154 Old Post Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscience Corporation N NAME: POUGHKEEPSIE ADDRES$: 154 Old Post Road CONTACT. Andria Quinn YEAR: 1947 Wapingers, NY 12590 INQUIRY#: 9831758.4 IMAP . LATILONG: 41.5734173.9085 RESEARCH BATE: 01/09/2007 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:50000 Historical Topographic Map TARGET -QUAD SITE NAME: 154 Old Post Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscienm Corporation N NAME: WAPPINGERS FALLS ADDRESS: 154 Old Post Road CONTACT: Andda Quinn ITMAP YEAR: 1947 Wapingers, NY 12590 INQUIRYM 1831758.4 LAVLONG: 41.5734 / 73.9085 RESEARCH DATE: 01/09/2007 _ SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 � fi�r}}111��jj A�R11 � 1 .EDR' Environmental DMta Resoijrt es Inc "Linking Technology with Tradition"® Sanborn® Map Report Ship To: Andria Quinn Order Date: 1/9/2007 Completion Date: 1/9/2007 Conrad Geoscience Inquiry #: 1831758.3 One Civic Center Plaza P.O. #: NA Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Site Name: 154 Old Post Road Address: 154 Old Post Road Customer Project: TWO70010 CitylState: Wapingers,NY 1.2590 1010510ERK 845-454-2544 Cross Streets: This document reports that the largest and most complete collection of Sanborn fire insurance maps has been reviewed based on client supplied information, and fire insurance maps depicting the target property'at the specified address were not identified, NO COVERAGE This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information far the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE 64 PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF CSA 44AGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA JURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, ( 6nmental risk levels or risk codes provided in lhis Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not Intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts l ding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide ,'—wirpation regarding the environmental risk for any property, Additionally, the Wormation provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved, Reproduction in any media or formal, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or Its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and Its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 154 Old Post Road r 1.54 Old Post Road Wapingers, NY 12590 luquiry Number: 1831758.5 January 09, 2007 VIAV . EDR( hVj:rbh nedtd1 �►✓' Dada: Resobrces: Inc The Standard .in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs professional researchers, provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade_ This document reports that EDR searched its own collection or select outside repository collections of aerial photography, and based on client -supplied target property information, aerial photography, including the target property was not deemed reasonably ascertainable by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). This no coverage determination reflects a search only of aerial photography repository collections that EDR accessed. It can not be concluded from this search that no coverage for thetarget•property exists anywhere, in any collection_ NO COVERAGE Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments.. mer - Copy This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc_ It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties" o - rCW NO - WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, I$ MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIR a RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIM A 0 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC: BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS. STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should the be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professionalcan provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, Is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanbom Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. The EDR City Directory Abstract 154 Old Post Road 154 Old Post Road Wapingers, NY 12590 Inquiry Number; 1831758.6 Thursday, January 11, 2007 MR." Eriuirorrrne W Data R�ssure-e� lie The Standard in Environmental Risk. Management Information 1440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com EDR City Directory Abstract Environmental Data.Resources, Inc.'s {EDR} City Directory Abstract is a screening report designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS'MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE, ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OROMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC, IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a phase l Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any properly. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other"trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. SUMMARY ■ City Directories: Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 2002 through 2002. (These years are not necessarily Inclusive.) A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. 1 t Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: January 11, 2007 Target Property: 154 Old Post Road Wapingers, NY 12590 Y10—f 2m 2002 Address Not Listed in Research Source Adjoining Properties SURROUNDING Multiple.Addresses Wapingers, NY 12590 ear f 2002 *Old Post Rd* Residence (114) Friendly Motorcars (134) Mamma's Towing Inc (150) No other addresses in range 1631758- 6 2 Source City's City Directory Source City's City Directory City's City Directory .City's City Directory Clty's City Directory City's City Directory The EDR Environmental LienSearchTM Report 154 OLD POST ROAD DUTCHESS COUNTY WAPXNGERS, NY 12590 Project Number: 41831758.75 January 18,2047 R® Environmental Data Resources Inc ':... . . N� The Standard in Environmental Risk Information 440 Wheelers Farm Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edmet.com The EDR Environmental LienSearch Report includes results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations; such as engineering controls and institutional controls. A network of professional, trained researchers follows established procedures to: • search for parcel information, legal description, and ownership -based on client supplied address information; • research indexes and title repositories; • obtain a copy of the deed; search for environmental encumbering instrument(s) associated with the deed; • provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s) based upon a review of key words in the instrument (title, parties involved, and description); and • provide a copy of the deed. 7hank.you for your business__. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark, Notice This report was prepared for the use of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,.and NCO Financial Services, Inc. exclusively, This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to Insure, or a policy of title insurance. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WTH THIS REPORT. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and NCO Financial Services, Inc, specifically disclaim the making of any such warranties, including without limitation, merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. The information contained in this report is'retrieved as it is recorded from the various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. Copyright 2006 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or.map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc, or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 154 OLD POST ROAD 154 OLD POST ROAD WAPINGERS, NY 12.690 RESEARCH SOURCE Sources: Dutchess County DEED INFORMATION. l Ype of Deed: VVD❑4CD ❑ Other DEED Title is vested in: Florence E. Mattison Title received from: George S. Mattison and Florence E- Mattison Deed Dated: February 10, 1994 Deed Recorded: April 21, 1994 Book: 1943 Page: 225 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description: Legal attached as Exhibit "A." Assessor's Parcel Number 135689-6157-04-649374-0040 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: Found ❑ Not Found If yes: 10 Party: 2n0 Party: Dated: Recorded: Book: Page: Comments: OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS,A( ULs) Other AUL's: Found ❑ Not Found . TARGET PROPERTYIN;tORMATiOh1 ADDRESS 154 OLD POST ROAD 154 OLD POST ROAD WAPINGER5, NY 12590 RESEARCH SOURCE Sources: Dutchess County DEED INFORMATION Type of Deed: WD" ❑ QCD ❑ Other Title is vested In: Victor N. Owen and Jacqueline Owen, his wife Title received from: Frank Ammelounx Deed Dated!' April 18, 1977 Deed Recorded: April 18, 1977 Book: 1460 Page: 368 Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description: Legal attached as Exhibit "B." Assessors Parcel Number 136689-6157-04649335-0000 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: If yes: 1't Party: 2"d Party: Dated: Recorded: Book: Page: Comments: Found ❑ Not Found OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS tAULs1 OtherAUL's: Found ❑ Not Found - DEED TARGET P ADDRESS 154 OLD POST ROAD 154 OLD POST ROAD WAPINGERS, NY 12590 RESEARCH SOURCE Sources: Dutchess County DEED INFORMATION Type of Deed: WD ❑ QCD ❑ Other ® DEED Title is vested in: Percy W, Briscoe and Jeanette Briscoe Title received from: Lucille Rankin Deed Dated: November 14, 1986 Deed Recorded: December 23, 1986 Book: 1730 Page: 910 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description: Legal attached as Exhibit °C:° Assesso('s Parcel Number: 135689-6157-04-614375-0000 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN Environmental Lien: Found ❑ Not Found If yes: 1'1 Party: 2nd Party Dated: Recorded: Book: Page: Comments: OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS AULs Other AUL's: Found ❑ Not Found IS EXHIBIT A av�rc att;� couUmIr cxamx =CGRUING VAo� It= U zn & Rr•ruR}r wo Y Pp.roowms CRQSs ars Arxox]YL ktLCbTtA£i�t u;/a�1sa 3$5 fiAiT7 JAST !LI": Z2 x 53 Y Lq4 P.O_ $OX X550 p731►G'83� NX .2'SQA COUNTY CLK"t 0,2049 Rnczxv3sv aaamt YAGUNIAl CUMAS VADPixJYi. MADRIMCIR )a �3EtAx:'�URs �'4A`A"1'�60Ki GRQRG� S STC EXAMXNED AND lc*MN-Ilm As FOLLOWS! a ��� TYPE: i7i32'�t=CTS i�V�PP�i'7G�R 7 R14COTMING CHARGE, 12_00 DTiTDI'S3°Ft av, MAGES; 3 TNx mv*mm pocszyy .TV-544; V r-OUNTY Cx. s" 9Y t vr..o Rocsxvw not %18 asst SA' C19 FMCOR.b: NDozli W County cla0c ►L nogmf O219042"S Paye t 14MW200T 1; a. ---"--•-. •-_ ..—..-_�.--� Y.r,gN ... �s ..sem, xxx r ,M.x .e■h■K G/M.�I'1 .tt■l. IairtiJH V Gwr..,�.wp 1Letl, tjlMlj . cowtKIr YOUR RwwXtit`rRtARR�stWVrHtf Tjtif 1NtrRtlAltlR#t7—tHli IffaYltlrtrt[1tY s}tbtftrk *a gird 6Y t.stwYrrts gl+LY. TUU 1NDF?4]'1_ PX,, ruadt rho 10th day of Fe brumz•y . nincmcts bwWrcd -,-Ad n3.l1r0ty - £bur ISE'Ililrl�7'i 4'SORG1e: s_ rtAT'.1`*soN, r�F�-dir�q est , imaTtumcn R. 1-i4TTisow, rssai$inct aft .011 Pvt:C Road, wappirt,gerts Alla, Ni►W Yo7Ckr party of ihec Emit parr. and FTA. HENCE Lr. MA'.CTtSON, rmsidlntg ht. 011 Poat• Roala, wavppingere Palls, NOW xo.=X, part at flue sex, d Fart, that tilm parry d the &rst part;, in coadocro-t not tent doltus and nsber vlauable eeasdiaradaa Paid b5r the party of the rrmnd part, do" riur.Ay g t land raleala unM11M PLrW 01:the fCGoidd part. the bitten ar puseessois w.►d st"it'as of Lhd part* of the end pan fordmox.. All tint ccrt4m Piot, piem or parcal of land, with the b"-rcff wK 1wp3rde=+nta+Manan srrectad, simair, fyitt- find brine in tbw %,OQtN OF li"PYNGER, CouYtty 4€ Dutchavo and abate of New vnrk, demcrirad ag followst BZGX1` NTNG at tfia ncirthwnbt corner of the Property now ox Tcxrm"rly o£ Ammisl.aull.m ort tate e•antarly aids oP' t:Tte old laogt Ragd and running r=otn thence Albnq thn ttorthnr].y aids al! saLd last mantioTted land in an easteYly d:L=ectioth 6rsstth 72' 08' 45" Eact :00.90 fags and South 711� 51' 7_5" >:s6t 536.42 i'aet Co is oQLane r++ttl] along the .arster%y tins ai' I,t rto. 2 on sl. ubavLei.ott utaP at flzoo)e Hollow zeta +--j--3f thonce in a r;arthwesteKly ditectivr, aad.ortg a Eton$ trail fond aloaq the mast 41ide tai' Lotar 2, 3 uttd 4 ot,. said snap, . North 14' 27 t' son wast= 5_07 Peat. . Narth 13'0 030 =r5't' W1nt 21.2.51 Ltecit and Horth 12' .201 Ed at 141.96 feet try a ratBtla grall jtatra-kion at: thtt aeut2talrly .lz.neb i}f land snob or Eormnrl,y of Shang running thence in a Vagtpxl.y dirOkction a*brief ei ald last vo6ntioned land ksartkt s6' 24• West 535.73 I;drt 1--0 the ea6terr1y elde or laid now or formetrly of Mauch; running +-hancc al.nrrct ws►Ld X^wt mentioned land aantl aont}rtt>ing alarkq the eaat,erly si4e tat Lft"d now or 'formerly of Putnkin, South 11:), 56, "Wont; 155 reef to a jpmLT t:p arLd rutining thence iii n Weeteily 8lrraction a1o?tcz, the Mc3uhherlyy slde of said lana now or r"Ormasl.y or iM-Akiit wz=th 72 3+a + Waav- 133.8 'feet no the an>at ai.dc of Old Post load to a point xb .€i -met northerly RYOm the �oinC ow plaen of beginning f runn1nS4 from t.hancd nous-,arly ft -101"g t:Re east, side of the Old Pont Ahad Stauth 164 53Y 20" Wo&t 20 1001: to 'the paint attd pYatca of 13agi3nrtin9. BEi"NG tha earn,b pretutlees convoyad by Joseph Meditz, Jr.'and CherYx Medit z, him wire, to deoYgc 8. t'tattLaon and Pl.�arenlCe $. Niat:tievrl, ttin wife. by eked dated-Hmvambax S, 1985 and rat:ordiad in t_hd olstcha PS countcountV C] o3t-k r at Doles on bT4vatxbrsr 20, 19135 in llb•w 1.688 OR poadr at verge 778.. -TOGETHER with alt rithx, title wad, interest, it sqy. of the panne of the Rrst part is and to any, •t=ri4s snd roads abutting the "owe de&mjrj6wa pro"*" tel tit* cddter titres thetaol i TC-GE'CHIM 1M b t}w Upputy -06115 ea awd At the estate, and rigittt at tiht p�wty of t!,c Ant powt in and to scald premises; -IrC7 14A`%i AND 'STs Iiat..n t%:7,tift te" 1■eraie Granted Unkp the party of (Pte ssoond peat, tlu es hetor aaeecafors and msfyns of the parry of oh' aecend pax t :4ire*tr. AND tic ;--ay of the ,■rat pkn towenant■ that the party of the. heal $mrl 1.a.. "ot dnnC or aulfered thnylhirig ether the j -;d pr.,niset have bean encwwberad is■ any wsy wtmatevev. cmcept as afarmadd ANI tbs party of the first part, in cwnp}irttsio wtth 5ectivn 13 of " Lien Law, covenants that the p�.rty of 'lite time part tvt11 sccc;wc Me. oansideratoon for trtit rtanveyance and Will hold the right to rccAPVC swt:tt cvasid- erst!oo Petr a trust hubd to lis applied first for the ppuUrjrOse nt paytn; ttte egstai ti■w tnnprox ens find wfl1 apply tl►e same Rat to tse l�ayrrterlt nl t1rff cast of the fonprsverncnt before woinCiny pawl of the tola.l 01 the wear rtaf wily outer pwr'pom „ 'Mv "vr•d "pasty" shall:be tormliAed •s 11 It reed "partic4r' wlrenevr,r the anise o1 thin. Lrtdeniwe ;a ,requires. W WTT7W1iS W*91Z0901P, the pa ray- of the Arat part has duly exrau thlt dead the der arta` year Krat sbovv rvatttert_ All 7MLS:Rear ev rAs ' Ga 9!K ■ a to n �1oreltGa L. 1'?.X`ttY,sCTt . CAL. t)ocO02199,12249 PlIgea 1110120071: k4j;a ,+- x6jtxtt 't+T�1ti dt' . GQIkRr ck==V•L'CTs ivy.', ssi the lb+ -L day of Pebr7utaxx 1994. , be Fora me perwcp&tziiy .ame c>�tax�r� a , t��xsolfr to TYK known to be the lndtriduni Seltcri'uot! itt Attd WU., - tactcuted the torwipmArsE inaRrunuet. -and ockuowtedgcd that heL c.ctctued t e tune. 17 my u '.•i� ROGIHltSU!'Vt-E No11[{Y pub AMU at Mw Yogi% il+►e�tkd tettlusr CmaatiY oonntisnn Esolre* Deaes rr 31. 1 OL-Y^Yf OF W~ YOIit, COMMY Or atm On the day of * 9 ,before sryq perwtaalty tante to rrie ler"es. wltoo bt;-r by me duly s worn, did depose and "y .list he rz&Wce Yt No. y it.at hK Is tete CL } the corpou [icer dtaeeibcd tits ioregairtg that OC koawa t*ht zeal of said cot-poration* khAt tare sptl a[fixtd = to &aid imlrurnmt Is 6ae.A cmrparaLt *Cal; kfmt It Veils sb o�lSatat! py- ov l" of t1,qt board of dirutor■ of za%i corpora- tran. and brat he alined k cmme dscreto by Wk. order. �ergaltt ani 16stlr �-rs� Wrrt� CavbNtircr wtt'rl;Ccr GKwtrrox� Rtrt& Yrrc.a rjck � To ava" left tos.++ w V4ff w Xa4t USA" of stnr tlri0ieWMTM lstr* d,.e.d iy =CURITYY7740.f1YDGcuX.++vXYt ItC°.iI Y erawirrenep woaa �alg s lLw -*"W �i f, I, "3 {TA,Tp of P4ww YObS. CotAwty or nDTC 34R$M su On the 3rd day of JAntlax-y 1493* a besort >M personally comm I`�O[i%�'L� �� rsr.TTISON to ruc known m he the fac*ividusS d*Wri exatttsxl the f 'ng instroment, wWwged 1 ahs S+r+eeurett r. ...� o ary FR.�adrn�S •t CAOSS iMotsry F ..:.�•- + „ •�F au0w ibrk avol.:..n �•.: rtv-�rs,sy Ca my — Cc>rnruiswon E�cPk+s 'd',/.a •-/ �s Si aril OF Now YO*M 4101.1 TY 61 ars Oil the day 4i 19 60e- w: mc. ptraoriatlr "Wc tho auhscribiA= vwtlncss td the 10:%oinp lrca&r.unent, with rahewrt Y ans tocraattbtly amus*, t-4, w1i0, bring by me duty sW4prps did dcpase,and aay that he rrrides bt "a. tFsat fie kisdw! � de"FA t:r! in and wbu exectttad 4w {upreggbl� ilrairwrieni that he, Bald subserihing nitntsr, wailprInant R� saw execUte.the Moral. ■rid that tre, raid wimtaa. oc the *acne time 'Uhacribcd h nodns art wltne" *Kra*o. "cTtOfd elatx LMT cooM- V nx raWN 1RYYtJ Ra+ rY ri[nii YO �. V�A,N Tl3Y �AOOI`tES, CROSS & t•. RC. 3$5 Mst>n SIL, .10, Pax 550 Benton. Now YUM 12-1500-0650 XJ! Na :At_ Dolt 621 "420140 Pago 3 - _ 1111L2DG7 1;. EXHIBIT B Iua',s , rrY M r rncrn..t�-•...� ...-...�.,w..,H�.��rri.■�. ����77yy���e�YY{/e1111 y� f�-7i��'}If7( M�Nub faro r t • 9 � ,1�grTr. lTrt 12'th 4110 rrf Avrj] jlervyRiMnr, Ibe .l.,y -\Ynrlrrb llyrrdm! q,rrl 9aYenty-MeVCn. C —k of neFM at pfrpr- WrLoree . pod "WRIfsed. at 3936 WorthaLtWCi.r�oarthsFort K"ra■ Flarida 33903, /Yrrk .,f that /1r*r girt: surd -�'—v-�IIi8�W8li�.h3■ tins, bogs ktia- alding at bbd Foviarbouse koad6 V ppiY� y1xs, •lie'► %fttk i2S90s I l rt�l►t!{ llrer lTrt lrr,rr y*.ffho-4r-11%rrrr.11f rrr31NlITl�lp��rA r .� _�+ .n•% 7q.7`; lusYyul'^nArll tf fAr r alrrd �1nrrN, rt ad atbar Sand AM vaLu�isrbLs h rrndisa��*ativn, PON JOU 1Ar l,�rf lar 0f rkrV"WMd/xt r1,.fr+ eo krrwliJ �n+i+l trlta[ t�rrerKR unl.� l' Port les raj 1k1 vt and parr, aga tb* suMrvivor of such end his or her dxatributa,aR Fe and s.signs Potrrevex:r ALS. that certain piece. , or PM=eY of Lasicl s#tuate, lying Bed being in the %n of Hapg*mr. COMMt7 of butcheaa *ad Stage of Nov iPxic, lgare payreietslarly 6asnsded'?;ltd dd$,ribed as follows:. nPG2l iiTld at a Point on ON etsstltarly side of the fi6s�Wra 14¢ntion,4 xPalte road and 20 feet varthaxi r fret the center a! a"i,escust ttCeer ' being the mQ0th0e8tdr1,y eoFner of other .ands, e£ rho Pat -rt" , of the first part heveto, and !tinning from rhepce 5odt1t 72"-36' East alos>,g tba line of avid other Ujids 28D,9 faat to an at%4; 406 East `ecntinutng a t114.1 South 7S' long the lira of said other •lands 51A.1 fcct, Passing northerly from the barn. to a point in tits scall, the.westarly . line of larris of Saucy, being the,north,eaeterly eorsser al" Cha ltcroin describasd lands; thence >iout>,, 14'^30' lost: along the wall, tine It", Of saiti Hal.ley's Unds 229,5 Let to a Corner In the wall= . thence along ran old wall, the luta, of Lauda of Kline South 61'►30' creat 100 feetl thsnca South 61' West 1.55.5 fact; tbettos 9aeith 610-20, West*'. 278 East to ■ codger lu tba vaRll £ram an angle of #aid KUZM lands; thertam Nortli6W-l0' West ISO £net to an +angle 1$• the scarf ; theme Forth 28'-20 west 78 East to s .carnesk in the malls;. thenen Souo 50'-"" Wrest cOntlau'pt 1'008 th4 watt the line of eaid.lClim1m Lands 131lames 1%6kth 3 9'-55' WaRt ieaevl� Said vAll sed tits. Klin* lands and slang the lima of atllcr fonds a� the parties Of then picot port hereto Eao.9 feet t6 as point its Lisa saatarly side side of [he above m mtiormd state ro*d• thenen atm $ thiast e6 fjBet to e a ie; thence Kof•th 23'-20'�Ust ad 222 ffeee t Go sa angle; thence iiottts -�n6 Eric 182;6 coact to the point cot.puca of BBCITpm Cantainitt i0 acres of land. E7gGSgtiEIG ao seue8 thaev! +�t��vas 40meyeA by Ft nk AaamsilatM to 81,aabird �e� LW*ZWV*tfd by Dead dated_ "Ptesber 29th.: 1967 add recorded in the butrl'svik County cif kiff b"Ke oil d 1967 in Uber fP 29th, 4 ltsp ab," amntjo__d x0 acres mrnre ox lean.lbei� t'h� pre�daaa daaeo>ribQd, In a wed by gives gyrus And Vfttur V. Byrne to dated I)e=lar 6, 1456 Crerlc'g —� aiud xeeo>rded in Duto',aat CaMty oqa j)aaotaber' 6y 1w in ulmr 933 4f peeda At na4 433, f '•` 'i. Citi• itE��V 17- r Y- �+ :.:;0Tf: r ::i7 P G1! ir�p •� JUL 1 41r �` .,;.�, . w11ry Y,�. r . , �• rU! •-•FER TAX rrcF+FsS ' r F' 369 , i 1 V r �ti um1460 hp j VL1�' �x Ga �p37� 1370 �r1ll+rhrnAAnr►.na►rrrerr►..f�nrjrrr�rtarcRrrdN�Frtn/t1'epRrf y of /met 1n anrlNO SWlPxrrl.I /nMrnl+rrx. f>d for � f hr �rrn►lrrr+r hcMlr+ �RfNt{ rI nrrfv rhe' �crr►urllxtrt, and [he a f�rl3es r+; flee or her dlYtrll�,at�e#vpx aP arch pert3ca and his ltNfafrl� A and assigns fmov". or�n'"h-- part y ryi Ihr /ere/ +�llf rr+r'rnnr►lslhrr! I►r fipp riul dr�rr'r rnY► unnrlrirr� e•lrrrrJiy 11+r• aRlf err„rJ,rx IrRrr. Irrr1► IxrxN,Lr►-r.1 1,. afffJ t,�,t� . N'hgrwrwl, . JIAo� ThRt. f!R fAr fti»irPliArrl-r With '.err, I.1 of (It- UP -11 Lgrr, 1h 0” fl-app for irf rrrrlrt rnnelrrrAgtfdn /Ill 1110 rnnrrywlrrr dANJ ,IN,lin{r/ lhe,rf�lrt Ire rrrrvr'✓ Aur h rnArefrlerelle►e na R f rMarf �RJrrt 10 he al►ht+*+d /teal Jnr Ihr rNil,ti�Ft' r}� Pr►fNH: flrr +ver f . the lruhR+ w"es►1 pled will np/►{v Ihr +wgra jlr:l !r, !hr l,ay+vrPtll n�[hr rhe rr�rllr i►e! prneYufr►rI brfnre ►lrrinrl Ony /wrf of rile fnln/ npr Ilia l►refryrrl t qy I err, j -pal kf 1 h3sr�t7enssu �e Ihr�a�Rd . ... #Ae�/I1re I+vrt has IfCrrrvnlowgr his ��__-- y Y" 4'y ahor o irwirn. �'o ftrr of h•tc.. � i �( ,/ ' !�,., j,,,. -�, e ss FFAME AHNRtDbnC 64tr d are til►. 4t LRS ^"' rlloth 7ur/ran JirrNdPr4 end d yl April ure Alfa. IAO +rnh.rrrbtr, I,y„nrtrrll� 4JiIlcnrrrf +�itF—Swan I rl Btd prl�ePAeralllr X�MrNf7! AArd �7irla(-1! ro rME is 1►R i1�4 �QAilr '+. ratio r-t+r�frtrd the IN1+4Jrr /Afeirrrr+rr►fr , ANd rA ►frerllrir.l /u �N7 ' fd w!'s 1hrtE he aserwifecr the ware, ha � . �� Cgmmhr�op l,cpuo� � '' .•'�, 'DCL. 3, 197% ' -Q• PC B�.can]�Cl.+�• 1508 - ... •. . � �. �: ' fi EXHIBIT C Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 4 NNW < 118 406 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 239 ft. 5 SE < 118 452 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 264 ft. WAPPINGERS PLAZA CLEANERS 1271 ROUTE 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY DRYCLEANERS: Facility ID: 3-1356-00221 Region: REG 3 REST: DUNAM 16A MCFARLAN RD WAPPENGERS FALLS, NY EDR ID Number Databases) EPA ID Number DRYCLEANERS $106436769 NIA NY Spills S102560691 NY Hist Spills NIA NY Spills: Site ID: 321422 Facility Addr2: Not reported Facility ID: 9612160 Spill Number: 9612160 Facility Type: ER SW15: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: VPMCCABE Referred To: Not reported Spill Date: 01/09197 Reported to Dept: 01/09/97 CID: 323 Spill Cause: Unknown Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Private Dwelling Spill Notifier: Other Cleanup Ceased: I 1 Cleanup Meets Std: True Last Inspection: 01/10/97 Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Trust: False Spill Class: Known release that creates potential for fire or hazard. (Highly improbable) Spill Closed Dt: 01/17/97 Remediation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer: 01/09/97 Spill Record Last Update: 02/03/97 Spiller Name: DEBRA Spiller Company: D & R FUEL Spiller Address: Not reported Spitler City,St,Zip: ZZ Spiller Company: 001 Spiller Phone: (914) 896-9126 Contact Name: MR DUNAM Contact Phone: (914) 297-7911 DEC Region: 3 Program Number. 9612160 DER Facility ID: 258931 Site 1D: 321422 Operable Unit ID: 1043665 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 340810 Material Code: 0001 Material Name: #2 Fuel Oil Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum TC1831758.2s Page 14 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site LEE MYLES TRANSMISSIONS (Continued) Overfill Prot; Dispenser: Date Tested: Next Test Date: Missing Data for Tank: Date Closed: Test Method: Deleted: Updated: Lattlong: Latflong: SWIS ID: Old PBS Number: Facility Type: Inspected Date: Inspector: Inspection Result: Federal ID: Certification Flag: Certification Date: Expiration Date: Renew Flag: Renewal Date: Total Capacity: FAMT: Facility Screen; Owner Screen: Tank Screen: Dead Letter, CBS Number: Town or City: County Code: Town or City: Region: PBS Number: SPDES Number: Emergency Contact: Emergency Telephone: Operator: Operator Telephone: Owner Name: Owner Address; Owner City,St,Zip: Owner Telephone: Owner Type: Owner Subtype: Mailing Name; Mailing Address: Mailing Address 2: Mailing City,St,Zip: Mailing Contact: Mailing Telephone: Owner Mark: Facility Status: Facility Addr2; Tank Id: Not reported Suction 11/0111986 Not reported Minor Data Missing Not reported Not reported False True Not reported Not reported 1356 Not reported OTHER RETAIL SALES Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported False 10/30/1995 10/3012000 False Not reported 2000 False No Missing Data No Missing Data Minor Data Missing False Not reported WAPPINGER 13 56 3 3-600832 Not reported UNKNOWN (000)000-0000 MARILYN BOWE . (914)297-5704 ROBERT TOMPKINS 24 STRAUB DRIVE PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 (914)635-8765 Corporate/Commercial Not reported LEE MYLES TRANSMISSIONS 124 OLD ROUTE 9 Not reported WAPPINGER FALLS, NY 12590 ROBERT TOMPKINS (914) 297-5704 First Owner 4 - Subpart 360-14 only (active) Not reported 002 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0003031079 TC1831758.2s Page 112 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site ASHLEY GARDENS (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Mailing Name: CIO SPECTRUM REAL ESTATE Mailing Address: SERVICES Mailing Address 2: 1481 ROUTE 52 Mailing City,St,Zip: HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NY 12533 Mailing Contact: WAPPINGERS FALLS OWNER Mailing Telephone: (914) 896-4445 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 1 - Active PBS facility, i.e. total capacity of the PBS tanks is greater than 1,100 gafions, regardless if Subpart 360-14 tanks exist or not at the facility. Facility Addr2: Not reported Tank Id: 2 Tank Location: UNDERGROUND Install Date: Not reported Capacity (gals): 5000 Product Stored: NOS 1,2, OR FUEL OIL Tank Type: Steel/carbon steel Tank Internal: None Tank External: None Pipe Location: Underground Pipe Type: STEEL/IRON Pipe Internal: None Pipe External: None Second Containment: None Leak Detection: None Overfill Prot: None Dispenser: Submersible Date Tested: Not reported Next Test Date: Not reported Missing Data for Tank: No Missing Data Date Closed: 08/01/1995 Test Method: Not reported Deleted: False Updated: True Lafllong: Not reported Lat/long: Not reported SWIS ID: 1356 Old PBS Number: Not reported Facility Type: APARTMENT BUILDING Inspected Date: Not reported Inspector: Not reported Inspection Resuft: Not reported Federal ID: Not reported Certification Flag: False Certification Date: 09/19/1995 Expiration Date: 09/01/2000 Renew Flag: False Renewal Date: Not reported Total Capacity: 5000 FAMT: True Facility Screen: No Missing Data Owner Screen: No Missing Data Tank Screen: No Missing Data Dead Letter: False CBS Number: Not reported Town or City: WAPPINGER County Code: 13 Town or City: 56. U002259866 TC1831758.2s Page 10. Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site HESS GAS STATION #32332 (Continued) Quantity Recovered: 7 Unkonwn Quantity Recovered: False EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S104503716 Material: GASOLINE Class Type: GASOLINE Times Material Entry In File: 21329 CAS Number. Not reported Last Date: 19940929 DEC Remarks: Not reported Remark: NOZZLE FELL OUT OF FILL WHILE UNKNOWN CUSTOMER WAS FUELING VEHICLE, ONTO CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT. CLEANED UP. 2 ASHLEY GARDENS UST U002259866 South 1229 ROUTE 9 HIST UST NIA < 118 WAPPINGER, NY 12533. 329 ft. Relative: UST: Lower Facility ID: 3-600806 Program Type: PBS Actual: Facility Addr2: Not reported 231 ft. Locality: WAPPINGERS FALLS SWIS Code: 1456 DEC Region: 3 Registered: 1 Expiration Date: 9/1/2000 Site Status; Active Site Type: Apartment Building Above Ground Tanks: No Under Ground Tanks: Yes HIST UST: PBS Number: 3-600806 SPDES Number: Not reported Emergency Contact: JIM ANDERSON Emergency Telephone: (914) 896-4445 Operator. PHIL Operator Telephone: (914) 297-2321 Owner Name: WAPPINGERS FALLS OWNERS CORP. Owner Address: ROUTE 52 Owner City,St,Zip: HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NY 12533 Owner Telephone: (914) 896-4445 Owner Type: Corporate/Commercial Owner Subtype: Not reported Mailing Name: CIO SPECTRUM REAL ESTATE Mailing Address! SERVICES Mailing Address 2: 1481 ROUTE 52 Mailing City,St,Zip: HOPEWELL JUNCTION, NY 12533 Mailing Contact: WAPPINGERS FALLS OWNER Mailing Telephone: (914) 896-4445 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 1 - Active PBS facility, i.e. total capacity of the PBS tanks is greater than 1,100 gallons, regardless if Subpart 360-14 tanks exist or not at the facility. Facility Addr2: Not reported Tank Id: 1 Tank Location: UNDERGROUND Install Date: Not reported Capacity (gals): 5000 TC1831758.2s Page 8 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NY Spills 5104503716 NY Hist Spills NIA Relative- NY Spills: Lower Site ID: 295706 Facility Addr2: Not reported Actual: Facility ID: 9707327 233 ft. Spill Number: 9707327 Facility Type: ER SWIS: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: VPMCCABE Referred To; Not reported Spill Data: 09!19197 Reported to Dept: 09/22/97 CID: 19 Spill Cause: Human Error Wafer Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Gasoline Station Spill Notifier. Affected Persons Cleanup Ceased: 1 / Cleanup Meets Std: True Last Inspection: 1 ! Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Trust: False " Spill Class: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 09122197 Remediation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer: 09/22/97 Spill Record Last Update: 11/05/97 Spiller Name: Not reported Spiller Company: UNKNOWN Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: NY Spiller Company: 999 Spiller Phone: Not reported Contact Name: SHERRY FISCHER Contact Phone: (914) 298-7366 DEC Region: 3 Program Number: 9707327 DER Facility ID: 239297 Site ID: 295706 Operable Unit ID: 1053704 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 332898 Material Code: 0009 Material Name: Gasoline Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 7.00 Units: Gallons Recovered: 7.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 9707327 NOZZLE FELL OUT OF FILL WHILE UNKNOWN CUSTOMER WAS FUELING VEHICLE, ONTO CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT, CLEANED UP. END CallerRemark - TC1831758.2s Page 6 TC1831758.2s Page 4 Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 118 1/8-1/4 914 -112 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted FEDERAL RECORDS NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL RECOVERY TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 'CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CORRACTS 1.000 .0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRA TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RCRA Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA Sm. Quan_ Gen. 0.250 0 .0 NR NR NR 0 ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NRNR NR NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0_ NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR- NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 iCIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS HSWDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 1 0 NR 1 DEL SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1 State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SWTIRE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LTANKS 0.500 2 3 6 NR NR 11. HIST LTANKS 0.500 0 3 5 NR NR 8 UST 0.250 2 2 NR NR NR 4 CBS UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 MOSF UST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 HIST UST 0.250 2 2 NR NR NR 4 AST 0.250 1 0 NR NR NR 1 CBS AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC1831758.2s Page 4 OVERVIEW MAP W 1831758,2s n% Target Property A sites at elevations higher than Indian Reservations BIA or equal to the target property ♦ Sites at elevations lower than the target property jk Manufactured Cas Plants National Priority Ust Sites 100 -year Rood zone Landfill Sites l Dept. Defense Sites TE NAME: 154 Old Post Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscience Corporation )DRESS: 154 Old Post Road CONTACT: Andda Quinn Wapingers NY 12590 INQUIRY #:.1831758.2s 1TILONG: 41-5734/73.9085 DATE: January 09, 2007 1:30 pm 00PY09M 0 2007 EDA, Int. 0 2007 Tele Alias Rel. ORM, 0 114 In 1 We% Indian Reservations BIA 2V Power transmission lines Oil & Gas pipelines 100 -year Rood zone EZ500 -year Rood zone National Wetland Inventory State Wetlands Thfs report Includes Interactive Map Layers to display hide and/or map Informatlon. The legend Includes only those Icons for the TE NAME: 154 Old Post Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscience Corporation )DRESS: 154 Old Post Road CONTACT: Andda Quinn Wapingers NY 12590 INQUIRY #:.1831758.2s 1TILONG: 41-5734/73.9085 DATE: January 09, 2007 1:30 pm 00PY09M 0 2007 EDA, Int. 0 2007 Tele Alias Rel. ORM, HIST SPILLS: This database contains records of chemical and petroleum spill incidents. Under State law, petroleum and hazardous chemical spills that can impact the waters of the state must be reported by the spiller (and, in some cases, by anyone who has knowledge of the spills), In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservation stopped providing updates to its original Spills Information Database_ This database includes fields that are no longer available from the NYDEC as of January 1., 2002. Current information may be found in the NY SPILLS database. A review -of the NY Hist Spills list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/2002 has revealed that there are 3 NY Hist Spills sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist! Dir Map ID Page REST, DUNAM 16A MCFARLAN RD 0 -'178 SE 5 14 Lower Elevation Address Dist 1 Dir Map ID Page HESS OAS STATION #32332 1237 ROUTE 9 0 -118 SSW 1 6 ROBINSON RESIDENCE - 19 BEACHWOOD CIRCLE 0-1/8 N 10 20 DRYCLEANERS: A listing of all registered drycleaning facilities. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/15/2004 has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Dist 1 Dir Map ID Page WAPPINGERS PLAZA CLEANERS 1271 ROUTE 9 0 =118 NNW 4 14 TC1831758.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Lower Elevation Address KOSCO : RES 102 OLD POST RD Date Closed: 02120/02 39 7-11 222 ALBANY POST ROAD Date Closed: 07/30/92 45 GETTY PETROLEUM 145 RT 9 Date Closed: 06/27/88 53 GETTY SIS 145 RT. 9 Date Closed: 04/28/05 59 Date Closed: 01/27/92 UNAMED GAS RT. 9 / OLD HOPEWELL Date Closed: 07/15/92 WAPPINGERS FALLS TOYOTA 1420 RT 9 Date Closed: 10/17/00 ALPINE COMMONS PKG LOT 1357 ROUTE 9 Date Closed: 02!13106 RESIDENCE 10 CURRYROAD Date Closed: 07/18/95 Dist / Dir Map ID Page 0 - 1/8 NNW A7 17 1/8-114NNW C14 39 114 -112N D15 42 114 - MN 016 45 114 - 112 NNW 17 50 114 - 112 NNW 18 53 1/4 - 112 N 20 58 114 - 112NNW 21 59 HIST LTANKS: A listing of leaking underground and aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills: In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservation stopped providing updates to its original Spills Information Database. This database includes fields that are no longer available from the NYDEC as of January 1, 2002. Current information may be found in the NY LTANKS database. A review of the HIST LTANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/01/2002 has revealed that there are 8 HIST LTANKS sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist 1 Dir Map ID SCOTT RESIDENCE 25 BEACH WOOD CIRCLE 118 - 114N if CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS 1197 ROUTE 9 118 - 114SSW 12 Lower Elevation Address Dist I Dir 'Map ID 7-11 222 ALBANY POST ROAD 118 114 NNW C14 GETTYPETROLEUM 145 RT 9 114 112N D15 GETTY SIS 145 RE 9 114 - 1/2N D16 UNAMED GAS RT, 9 / OLD HOPEWELL 114 - 1/2 NNW 17 WAPPINGERS FALLS TOYOTA 1420 RT 9 114 - 1/2 NNW 18 RESIDENCE ' 10 CURRY ROAD 114-1/2NNW 21 UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of Environmental Conservation's Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) Database A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/14/2006 has revealed that there are 4 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS 1197 ROUTE 9 118-114SSW 12 Page 22 25 Page 39 42 45 50 53 59 Page 25 TC1831758.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 RCRA-SQG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information ERNS ------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System HMIRS----------------------- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System US ENG CONTROLS --------- Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL--------. Sites with Institutional Controls DOD------------------------- Department of Defense Sites FUDS----------------------- - Formerly Used Defense Sites US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites CONSENT------------------- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD------------------------- Records Of Decision UMTRA---------------------- Uranium Mill Tailings Sites ODI-------------------------- Open Dump Inventory TRIS ------------------------- Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA- - --------------.-------- Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS�-----------------------. FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) SSTS------------------------ Section 7 Tracking Systems . LCIS-------------------------- Integrated Compliance Information System PADS------------------------ PCIS Activity Database System MILTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System MINES----------------------- Mines Master Index File FINDS ------------------------ Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS--------------- .------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS HSWDS---------------------- Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site Inventory SWFILF---------------------- Facility Register SWRCY---------------------- Registered Recycling Facility List SWTIRE---------------------- Registered Waste Tire Storage & Facility List a CBS UST-------------------- Chemical Bulk Storage Database MOSF UST ------------------ . Major Oil Storage Facilities Database CSS AST-------------------- Chemical Bulk Storage Database HIST AST-------------------- Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database MOSF AST------------------, Major 011 Storage Facilities Database NY MANIFEST--------------- Facility and Manifest Data ENG CONTROLS------------ Registry of Engineering Controls INST CONTROL -------- Registry of Institutional Controls VCP-------------------------. Voluntary Cleanup Agreements BROWNFIELDS-------------. Brownfields Site List SPDES----------------------. State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System AIRS------------------------- Air Emissions Data TRIBAL RECORDS INDIAN RESERV------------- Indian Reservations INDIAN LUST---------------- Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN UST----------------- Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Manufactured Gas Plants--- EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants SURROUNDING SITES. SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. TC1831758.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------ ES1 OverviewMap------------------------------------------------------------ 2 DetailMap -------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary--------------------------------------------------- 4 MapFindings ----------------------------------------------------------- 6 Orphan Summary----------.----------------------------------------------- 65 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GR -1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum--------- _------_---------------------- A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary------------------------------------------ A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map------------------------------------------ A-5 Physical Setting Source Map ------------------------------------------------- A -g Physical Setting Source Map Findings---------------------------------------- A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched--------------------------- -------- A-25 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain Information obtained from a variety. of public and other sources reasonably available to Env€ronmental Data .Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH.THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK'IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the Information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, Is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are tradgmarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC1831758.2s Page 1 0, Map ID Direction Distance { 1 Distance (ft.) Elevation Site RESI: DUNAM (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S102560691 Quantity: 0.00 Units: Gallons Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Sail Oxygenate: False DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 9612160 OIL FOUND IN THE BASEMENT OF THE RESIDENCE, UNKNOWN EXACTLY WHERE IT CAME FROM. INVESTIGATING AT THIS TIME. END CallerRemark - 9612160 Remarks: Start DECRemark - 9612160' Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead DEC Feld was "MCCADE" 01!97197 OLD TANK REPLACED BE=CAUSE OF SPLIT INSEAM; SPILL CLEANED UP. END DECRemark - 9612160 NY Hist Spills: Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number: 9612160 Investigator MCCABE Caller Name: Not reported Caller Agency: Not reported Caller Phone: Not reported Notifier Name: Not reported Notifier Agency: Not reported Notifier Phone: Not reported Spill Date/Time: 01/09/1997 14:45 Reported to Dept DateMme: 01/09/97 14:48 SWIS: 13 Spiller Name: D & R FUEL Spiller Contact: DEBRA Spiller Phone: (914) 896-9126 Spiller Contact: MR DUNAM Spiller Phone: (914) 297-7911 Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: Not reported Spill Cause: Unknown Reported to Dept: On Land Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: 09 Spill Notifier: Other PSS Number. Not reported Cleanup Ceased: 1 1 Cleanup Meets Std: True Last Inspection: 01110!97 Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended Spiller Cleanup Dt: /1 Enforcement Date: I I Invstgn Complete: I I UST Involvement: False Spill Class: Known release that creates potential for fire or hazard. (Highly Improbable) Spill Closed Dt: 01/17/97 Corrective Action Plan Submitted: 1 1 Date Region Sent Summary to Central Office: / 1 Date Spill Entered In Computer Data File: 01/09/97 Date Spill Entered In Computer Data File: Not reported Update Date: 02/03/97 Is Updated: False PBS Number: Not reported Tank Number. Not reported Tank Size: Not reported TC1831758.2s Page 15 Map ID''` Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR Ib Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number PALMITIER HOME (Continued) S107410312 Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: MARIE PALMITIER Spiller Phone: (845) 297-2769 Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number: 0505971 DER Facility ID: 298345 Site ID: 351082 Operable Unit ID: 1108618 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 2098559 Material Code: 0001 Material Name: #12 Fuel Oil Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: . 4.00 Units: Gallons Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False Site ID: Not reported Spill Tank Test: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate: Not reported Gross Fail: Not reported Modified By: Not reported Last Modified: Not reported Test Method: Not reported DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 0505971 PLUG IN TANK WAS RUSTY AND LEAKING: CLEANED UP AREA: END CallerRemark - 0505971 Remarks: Start DECRemark - 0505971 Resident noticed orders of fuel oil for the next few days. Today she discovered a leak under t he outside AST. Kosco drained the tank and will install a new one. None of the soil under the AST has been addressed as of yet. D. Weitz will investigate. RA 10/24/05 D. Weitz had visited site on 917105. Kosco had drained the old tank, and planned on Installing a new tank. The ground underneath the old tank needed to be removed. A subsequent visit approx. 2 weeks latershowed that the area in question had been dug up, and the new AST was installed. NFA END DECRemark -0505971 A7 KOSCO : RES LTANKS S105995171 NNW 102 OLD POST RD NIA a 918 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 55.7 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: Lower LTANKS: Site ID: 215560 Actual: Spill Date: 02/13/02 227 ft. Facility Addr2: Not reported Facility ID: 0110854 Program Number: 0110854 SWIS: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: DXWEITZ { y Referred To: Not reported ` Reported to Dept: 02/13102 TC1831758.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site B8 NW < 118 570 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 239 ft. B9 NW < 118 570 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 239 ft: KOSCO: RES (Continued) 212012002, END DECRemark - 0110854 EXXON MOBIL OIL CORP SS#LAG #16278 aARIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. WAPPINGER, NY 12590 Site 1 of 2 in cluster B AST: 94237 Facility ID: 3-048011 Program Type: PBS Facility Addr2: 1277 ROUTE 9 Locality: WAPPINGERS FALLS SWIS Code: 1456 DEC Region: 3 Registered: 1 Expiration Date: 3/24/2007 Site Status: Active Site Type: Retail Gasoline Sales Above Ground Tanks: Yes, Under Ground Tanks: Yes EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 8105995171 AST A100139089 NIA EXXON MOBIL NY Spills S106698560 1277 ROUTE 9 NIA WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY Site 2 of 2 in cluster B NY Spills: Site ID: 94237 Facility Addr'L: Not reported Facility ID: 0405650. Spill Number. 0405650 Facility Type: ER SWIS: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator. VPMCCABE Referred To: Not reported Spill Date: 08/22/04 Reported to Dept: 08/23/04 CID: 19 Spill Cause: Equipment Failure Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Gasoline Station Spill Notifier: Responsible Party Cleanup Ceased: Cleanup Meets Std: False Last Inspection: 1 1 Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Trust: True Spill Class: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party, Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 10/01/04 Remediation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer: 08/23/04 Spill Record Last Update: 11/09/04 TC1831758.2s Page 19 14, 11) Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site ROBINSON RESIDENCE (Continued) Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S102110149 UST Trust: False Spill Class: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party, Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 01/17/95 Remediation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer. 1 1 Spill Record Last Update: 12102!03 Spiller Name: Not reported Spiller Company: Not reported Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: *-Update"*`. ZZ Spiller Company: 001 Spiller Phone: Not reported Contact Name: Not reported Contact Phone: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number, 9413038 DER Facility ID: 231716 Site ID: 285853 Operable Unit ID: 1010571 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 375322 Material Code: 0066A Material Name: UNKNOWN PETROLEUM Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 0.00 Units: Not reported Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 9413038 STANDING WATER NEAR DRAIN PIPE HAS POSSIBLE OIL OR ODOROUS MATERIAL MCCABE DID SITE INSPECT SKATER APPEARS TO HAVE SYPTIC SMEEL TO IT $ BIO -SHEEN UNDER ICE END CallerRemark - 9413038 Remarks: Not reported NY Hist Spills:. Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number 9413038 Investigator. McCABE Caller Name: Not reported Caller Agency: Not reported Caller Phone: Not reported Notifier Name: Not reported Notifier Agency: Not reported Notifler. Phone: Not reported Spill Datefrime: 12/29/1994 12:00 Reported to Dept Date/Time., 12/30/94 11:17 SWIS: 13 Spitler Name: Not reported Spitler Contact: Not reported Spitler Phone: Not reported Spitler Address: Not reported Spitler City,St,Zip: Not reported Spill Cause: Unknown Reported to Dept: On Land TC1831758.2s Page 21 11) Map ID - Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SCOTT RESIDENCE (Continued) S104781841 CID: 19 Spill Cause:: Tank Failure Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Private Dwelling Spill Notifier: Responsible Party Cleanup Ceased: ! 1 Cleanup Meets Standard: False . Last. Inspection: Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended LIST Involvement: False Spill Class: Known release that creates potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 1 / Remediation Phase: 1 Date Entered In Computer: 07/07/00 Spill Record Last Update: 04/24/06 Spille Namer: Not reported Spiller Company: RESIDENCE Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extentiom Not reported Spiller Address: 25 BEACH WOOD CIRCLE SpillerCity,St,Zip: WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: CALLER Splller Phone; (914) 297-8532 t Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number: 00.04187 DER Facility ID: 78527 Site ID: 85483 Operable Unit ID: 825405 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 548930 Material Code: "0001 Material Name: #2 Fuel Oil Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 50.00 Units: Gallons Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False Site ID: Not reported Spill Tank Test: Not reported Tank Number. Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate: Not reported Gross Fail: Not reported Modified By: Not reported Last Modified: Not reported Test Method: Not reported DEC- Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 0004187 caller reporting a spill of material from a tank failure. partial clenup was preformed and no callback was necessary. still some residue left In house. END CallerRemark - 0004187 Remarks: Start DECRemark - 0004187 Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead ( DEC Field was "MCCABE" SEE TWO PAGE UPDATE BY V. MCCABE; IDC TO FINISH TC1831758.2s Page 23 Map ID Directions (". Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SCOTT RESIDENCE (Continued) 5104781849 Spill Record Last Update: 01/16/01 Is Updated: False PBS Number: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate Failed Tank: Not reported Gross Leak Rate: Not reported Material Class Type: Petroleum Quantity Spilled: 50 Unkonwn Quantity Spilled: False Units: Gallons Quantity Recovered: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Recovered :.False Material: 92 FUEL OIL Class Type: #2 FUEL OIL Times Material Entry In File: 24464 CAS Number: Not reported Last Date: 19941207 DEC Remarks SEE TWO PAGE UPDATE BY V.. MCCABE; IDC TO FINISH CLEANUP. Spill Cause: caller reporting a spill of material from a tank failure: partial clenup was preformed and no callback was necessary, stili some residue left in house. 12 CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS UST 0001844467 SSW 1197 ROUTE 9 LTANKS NIA 118-1I4 WAPPINGER, NY 12590 HIST UST 975 ft. HIST LTANKS Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: 3-507059 Program Type: PBS Actual: FacilityAddr2: Not reported 244 ft. Locality: WAPPINGERS FALLS SWIS Code: 1456 DEC Region: 3 Registered: 1 Expiration Date: 12/3/1895 Site Status: Unregulated.(<1101 gallons) Site Type: Unkown Above Ground Tanks: No Under Ground Tanks: No LTANKS: Site ID: 248530 Spill Date: 10/16190 Facility Addr2: Not reported Facility ID: 9007767 Program Number: 9007767 SWIS: 1456 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: dxtraver Referred To: Not reported Reported to Dept: 10/16/90 CID: 19 Spill Cause: Tank Failure Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Commercial/Industrial TC1831758.2s Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS (Continued) U001844467 HIST UST: PBS Number. 3-507059 SPDES Number: Not reported Emergency Contact: ROBERT E. TOMPKINS Emergency Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Operator: ROBERT E. TOMPKINS Operator Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Name: ROBERT E TOMPKINS (PROA.OWNER) Owner Address: STRAUB DRIVE Owner City,St,Zip: PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 Owner Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Type: Not reported Owner Subtype: Not reported Mailing Name: ROBERT E TOMPKINS (PROP.OWNER) Mailing Address: STRAUB DRIVE Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 Mailing Contact: Not reported Mailing Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 2 - Unregulated by PBS (the total capacity Is less than 1,101 gallons) and Subpart 360-14:. Facility Addr2: Not reported Tank Id: 001 Tank Location: UNDERGROUND Install Date: Not reported Capacity (gals): 5000 Product Stored: LEADED GASOLINE Tank Type: Steel/carbon steel Tank Internal: Not reported Tank External: Not reported Pipe Location: Not reported Pipe Type: Not reported Pipe. Internal: Not reported Pipe External: Not reported Second Containment: None Leak Detection: None Overfill Prot: Not reported Dispenser. Suction Date Tested: Not reported Next Test Date: Not reported Missing Data for Tank: Minor,Data Missing Date Closed: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Deleted: False Updated: False Latllong: Not reported Lat/long: Not reported SWIS ID: 1356 Old PBS Number: Not reported Facility Type: Not reported Inspected Date: Not reported Inspector. Not reported Inspection Result: Not reported Federal ID: Not reported Certification Flag: False Certification Date: Not reported TC1831758.2s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site f.e CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS (Continued) Test Method: Not reported Deleted: False Updated: False Latllong: Not reported Lattiong: Not reported SWIS ID: 1356 Old PBS Number. Not reported Inspected Date: Not reported Inspector: Not reported Inspection Result: Not reported Federal ID: Not reported Certification Flag: False Certification Date; Not reported Expiration Dafe: 12/0311995 Renew Flag: False Renewal Date: Not reported Total Capacity: 0 FAMT: True Facility Screen: Minor Data Missing Owner Screen. Minor Data Missing Tank Screen; 0 Dead Letter: False CBS Number: Not reported Town or City: WAPPINGER County Code; 13 Town -or City: 56 Region: 3 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number PBS Number. 3-507059 SPDES Number: Not reported Emergency Contact: ROBERT E_ TOMPKINS Emergency Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Operator: ROBERT E. TOMPKINS Operator Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Name: ROBERT E TOMPKINS (PROP.OWNER) Owner Address: STRAUB DRIVE Owner City,St,Zip: PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 Owner Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Type: Not reported Owner Subtype: Not reported Mailing Name: ROBERT E TOMPKINS (PROP.OWNER) Mailing Address: STRAUS DRIVE Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 Mailing Contact: Not reported Mailing Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 2 - Unregulated by PBS (the total capacity is less than 1,101 gallons) and Subpart 360-14, Facility Addr2: Not reported Tank Id: 003 Tank Location; UNDERGROUND Install Date: Not reported Capacity (gals): 5000 Product Stored: LEADED GASOLINE Tank Type: Steel/carbon steel Tank Internal: Not reported 0001844467. TC1831758.2s Page 29 Q Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS (Continued) Mailing Contact: Not reported Mailing Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 2 - Unregulated by PSS (the total capacity is less than 1,101 gallons) and Subpart 360-14, Facility Add2: Not reported Tank Id: 004 Tank Location: UNDERGROUND Install Data: Not reported Capacity (gals): 2000 Product Stored: LEADED GASOLINE Tank Type: Steel/carbon steel Tank Internal: Not reported Tank External: Not reported Pipe Location: Not reported Pipe Type: Not reported Pipe Internal: Not reported Pipe External: Not reported Second Containment: None Leak Detection: None Overfill Prot: Not reported Dispenser: Suction Date Tested: Not reported Next Test Date: Not reported Missing Data for Tank: Minor Data Missing Date Closed: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Deleted:. False Updated. False Lattlong: Not reported Lattlong: Not reported SWIS ID: 1356 Old PBS Number: Not reported Inspected Date: Not reported Inspector: Not reported Inspection Result: Not reported Federal ID: Not reported Certification Flag: False Certification Date: Not reported Expiration Date: 12/03/1995 Renew Flag: False Renewal Date: Not reported Total Capacity: 0 FAMT: True Facility Screen: Minor Data Missing Owner Screen: Minor Data Missing Tank Screen: 0 Dead Letter: False CBS Number: Not reported Town or City: WAPPINGER County Code: 13 Town or City: 56 Region: 3 PBS Number: 3-507059 SPDES Number. Not reported Emergency Contact: ROBERT E. TOMPKINS U001844467 TC1831758.2s Page 31 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site N) CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS (Continued) Facility Screen- Minor Data Missing Owner Screen: Minor Data Missing Tank Screen: 0 Dead Letter. f=alse CBS Number: Not reported Town or City: WAPPINGER County Code: 13 Town or City: 56 Region: 3 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number PBS Number: 3-507059 SPDES Number: Not reported Emergency Contact: ROBERT E. TOMPKINS Emergency Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Operator: ROBERT E. TOMPKINS Operator Telephone; (914) 635-8765 Owner Name: ROBERT E TOMPKINS (PROP.OWNER) Owner Address: STRAUB DRIVE Owner City,St,Zip: PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 Owner Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Type: Not reported Owner Subtype: Not reported Mailing Name: ROBERT.E TOMPKINS (PROP.OWNER) Mailing Address: STRAUB DRIVE Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zp: PLEASANT VALLEY, NY 12569 Mailing Contact: Not reported Mailing Telephone: (914) 635-8765 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 2 - Unregulated by PBS (the total capacity is less than 1,101 gallons) and Subpart 360-14. Facility Addr2: Not reported Tank Id: 006 Tank Location: UNDERGROUND Install Date: Not reported Capacity (gals): 500 Product Stored: UNKNOWN Tank Type: Steel/carbon steel Tank Intemal: Not reported Tank External: Not reported Pipe Location: Not reported Pipe Type: Not reported Pipe Internal: Not reported Pipe External: Not reported Second Containment: None Leak Detection: None Overfill Prot: Not reported Dispenser:. Suction Date Tested: Not reported Next Test Date: Not reported Missing Data for Tank: Minor Data Missing Date Closed: Not reported Test Method; Not reported Deleted: False Updated: False Latllong; Not reported Latllong: Not reported U001844467 TC1831758.2s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site C13 NNW 118-114 1301 ft. Relative: Lower Actual 197 ft. CAR LIFE TRANSMISSIONS _(Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA tD Number U001844467 Last Inspection: / ! Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended Spiller Cleanup Date:. I ! Enforcement Date: I I Investigation Complete: I I UST Involvement: True Spill Class: Possible release with minimal potential for fire or hazard or Known release with Registered; no damage. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 10!24/90 Date Region Sent Summary to Central Office: / 1 Corrective Action Plan Submitted: Date Spill Entered In Computer Data File: 10/24/90 Time Spill Entered In Computer Data File: Not reported Spill Record Last Update: 10!25/90 Is Updated: False PBS Number: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate Failed Tank: Not reported Gross Leak Rate: Not reported . Material Class Type: Petroleum Quantity Spilled: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Spilled: False Units: Not reported Quantity Recovered: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Recovered: False Material: GASOLINE Class Type: GASOLINE Times Material Entry In File: 21329 CAS Number: Not reported Last Date: 19940929 DEC Remarks: 09127195: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: CONTAM. SOIL. 12/12/97 LETTER SENT; NOTICE OF VIOLATION; Spill Cause: TANKS AND CONT. SOIL REMOVED. NO] PRODUCT ON GRDWATER IN TANK HOLE. NFA 10-24-90 7 -ELEVEN #25393 UST U003297843 1425 ALBANY POST ROAD HIST UST N/A WAPPINGER, NY 12590 Site 1 of 2 in cluster C UST: . Facility ID: 3-173002 Program Type: PBS Facility Addr2! Not reported Locality: WAPPINGER FALLS SWIS Code: 1456 DEC Region; 3 Registered; 1 Expiration Date: 1/7/2008 Site Status: Active Site Type: Retail Gasoline Sales Above Ground Tanks: No Under Ground Tanks: Yes TC1831758.2s Page 35 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 7 -ELEVEN #25393 (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Expiration Date: 01/07/2003 Renew Flag: . False Renewal Date: Not reported Total Capacity: 30000 FAMT: True Facllity.Screen: No Missing Data Owner Screen: No Missing Data Tank Screen: No Missing Data Dead Letter: False CBS Number: Not reported Town or City: WAPPINGLR County Code: 13 Town or City: 56 Region: 3 PBS Number. 3-173002 SPDES Number: Not reported Emergency Contact: ROBERT CATALDO Emergency Telephone: (508) 393-6779 Operator 7 -ELEVEN, INC. Operator Telephone: (914) 297-1988 Owner Name: 7 -ELEVEN, INC. Owner Address: P.O. BOX 7111 Owner City,St,Zip: DALLAS, TX 75221-0711 Owner Telephone: (214) 828-0711 Owner Type; Corporate/Commercial Owner Subtype: Not reported _ Mailing Name: 7 -ELEVEN, INC. Mailing Address: 814 BAKER ROAD Mailing Address 2: Not reported Mailing City,St,Zip: VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462 Mailing Contact: GARRY W. BLAIR Mailing Telephone: (757) 490-1711 Owner Mark: First Owner Facility Status: 1 - Active PBS facility, i.e. total capacity of the PBS tanks is greater than 1,100 gallons, regardless if Subpart 360-14 tanks exist or not at the facility. Facility Addr2: Not reported Tank Id: 2 Tank Location: UNDERGROUND Install Date: 19841201 Capacity (gals): 10000 Product Stored: UNLEADED GASOLINE Tank Type: Fiberglass reinforced plastic [FRP] Tank Internal' None Tank External: Fiberglass Pipe Location: Underground Pipe Type: FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC Pipe Internal: Other Pipe External: Other Second Containment: Other Leak Detection: 99 Overfill Prot: Automatic Shut -Off, Catch Basin Dispenser. Submersible Date Tested: 12/01/1997 Next Test Date: 12101/2002 Missing Data for Tank: No Missing Data Date Closed: Not reported 0003297843 TC1831758.2s Page 37 Map ID Direction w _ Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 7 -ELEVEN #25393 (Continued) Tank Internal: None Tank External: Fiberglass Pipe Location: Underground Pipe Type: FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC .Pipe Internal: Other Pipe Extemal: Other Second Containment: Other Leak Detection: 99 Overfill Prot: Automatic Shut -Off, Catch Basin Dispenser: Submersible Date Tested: 12!0111997 Next Test Date: 12/01/2002 Missing Data For Tank: No Missing Data Date Closed: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Deleted: False Updated: True Lat/long: Not reported Lattlong: Not reported SWIS ID; 1356 Old PBS Number: Not reported Facility Type: RETAIL GASOLINE SALES Inspected Date: Not reported Inspector: Not reported Inspection Result: Not reported Federal ID: Not reported Certification Flag: False Certification Date: 09/24/1999 Expiration Date: 01/07/2003 Renew Flag: False Renewal bate: Not reported Total Capacity: 30000 FAMT: True Facility Screen: No Missing Data Owner Screen: No Missing Data Tank Screen: No Missing Data Dead Letter, False CBS Number. Not reported Town or City: WAPPINGER County Code! 13 Town or City: 56 Region: 3 C14 7-11 NNW 222 ALBANY POST ROAD 118-114 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 1301 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C Relative; Lower LTANKS: Site ID: 331467 Actual: Spill Date: 04/17/91 197 ft. Facility AddrZ Not reported Facility Ib: 9100701 Program Number: 9100701 SWIS: 1400 E Region of Spill: 3 Investigator. WXWADSWO EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 11003297843 LTANKS- S100142277 HIST LTANKS NIA TC1831758.2s Page 39 54, Map ID Direction Distance Distance Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 7 -11 (Continued) S100142277 Remarks: Start DECRemark - 9100701 Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead DEC Field was *WADSWORTH" 05108191: TANKS PASSED RETEST ON 4/23/91,, 09127195: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: TANK TEST. END DECRemark - 9100701 HIST LTANKS: Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number: 9100701 Investigator: WADSWORTH Caller Name: Not reported Caller Agency: Not reported Caller Phone: Not reported Caller Extension: Not reported, Notifier Name: Not reported Notifier Agency: Not reported Notifier Phone: Not reported Notifier Extension: Not reported Spill Date: 04/17/1991 Spill Time: 15:30 Reported to Department Dale: 04/17/91 Reported to Department Time; 16:11 SWIS: 13 Spiller Contact: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported Spiller Name: SOUTHLAND CORP. Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported F=acility Phone: (804) 498-4711 Facility Exlention: Not reported Spill Cause: Tank Test Failure Resource Affectd: On Land Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Gas Station Spill Notifier. Tank Tester PBS Number: Not reported Cleanup Ceased: 07/30/92 Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: 1 / Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended Spiller Cleanup Date: 1 I Enforcement Date: 1 I Investigation Complete: I/ UST Involvement: True Spill Class; Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard: DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed DL 07/30/92 Date Region Sent Summary to Central Office: I / Corrective Action Plan Submitted: /I Date Spill Entered In Computer Data File: 04/18/91 Time Spill Entered In Computer Data File: Not reported Spill Record Last Update: 11/22/94 Is Updated' False PBS Number: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: 0 TC1831758,2s. Page41 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number GETTY PETROLEUM (Continued) 5100346544 Spiller City,St,7ip: 7z Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number: 8800128 DER Facility ID: 98864 Site ID: 113283 Operable Unit ID: 916972 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 462849 Material Code: 0009 Material Name: Gasoline Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 0.00 Units: Gallons Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Groundwater Oxygenate: False Site ID: 113283 Spill Tank Test: 8134 , Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: 0 Test Method: 00 1 Leak Rate: 0.00 Gross Fail: Not reported Modified By: Spills Last Modified. 10/01/04 Test Method: Unknown DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 8800128 10K SYSTEM FAILED PETRO-TITE AT UNDETERMINABLE RATE. TO EXC 8. RET. UPDATE:04-07-88 AS PER JOVINA WALDO;INCONCLUSIVE TEST. TO CONTACT DEC. J.OK- END CallerRemark - 8800128 Remarks: Start DECRemark - 8800128 Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead DEC Field was "OKESSON" 07127188: RETEST PASSED. -10K. 11129195: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: UNLEADED. 31112006 TCR received and referred to McCabe. PBS# 3-175218, Fac# 2328 - jc END DECRerlark - 8800128 HIST LTANKS: Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number: 8800128 Investigator. OKESSO N Caller Name: Not reported Caller Agency:. Not reported Caller Phone: Not reported Caller Extension: Not reported Notifier Name: Not reported Notifier Agency: Not reported Notifier Phone: Not reported Notifier Extension: Not reported Spill Date: 04/05/1988 Spill Time: 16:00 Reported to Department bate: 04/05/88 Reported to Department Time: 16:12 SWIS: 13 TC1831758.2s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site D16 North 114-112 1402 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 214 ft. GBETTY SIS 145 RT. 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY Site 2 of 2 in cluster D EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number LTANKS S104073722 HIST LTANKS NIA . LTANKS: Site ID: 93909 Spill Date: 09/03/91 Facility Addr2: Not reported Facility ID: 9105963 Program Number: 9105963 SWIS: 1456 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator. VPMCCABE Referred To: Not reported Reported to Dept: 09/03/91 CID: Not reported Spill Cause: Tank Test Failure Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Gasoline Station Spill Notifier. Tank Tester Cleanup Ceased: 1 I Cleanup Meets Standard: False Last Inspection: 1 I Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Involvement: True Spill Class: Known release that creates potential for fire of hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 04/28/05 Remediation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer. 09/09/91 Spill Record Last Update: 03/07/06 Spille Namer: Not reported Spiller Company: SAME " Spiller Phone: (914) 297-9522 Spiller Extention: Not reported SplllerAddress: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: ZZ Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: Not reported' Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number. 9105963 DER Facility ID:" 305916 Site ID: 93909 Operable Unit ID: 956470 Operable Unit, 01 Material ID: 4217119 Material Code: 0009 Material Name: Gasoline Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 0.00 Units: Pounds Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: True TC1831758.2s Page 45 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site GETTY SIS (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 5104073722 SWIS: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: WXWADSWO Referred To: Not reported Reported to Dept: 09/10/91 CID: Not reported Spill Cause: Tank Test Failure Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Gasoline Station Spill Notifier: Tank Tester Cleanup Ceased: 06/18/53 Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: / 1 Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Involvement: True Spi]bClass: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Wiling Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 01/27/92 Remedlation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer: 09/13/91 Spill Record Last Update: 03/07/06 Spille Namer: Not reported Spiller Company: SAME Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported a Spiller Address: Not reported ! Spiller City,8t,Zip: NY Spiller County: 999 Spiller Contact: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number 9106218 DER Facility 10. 84137 Site ID: 93910 Operable Unit ID: 960545 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 421947 Material Code: 0009 Material Name: Gasoline Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 0.00 Units: Not reported Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False Site ID: 93910 Spill Tank Test: 13588 Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: 0 Test Method: 00 Leak Rate: 0.00 Gross Fail: Not reported Modified 6y: Spills Last Modified: 10/01/04 Test Method: Unknown TC1831758.2s Page 47 Map ID «. Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number GETTY SIS (Continued) S104073722 Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: 0 Test Method! Not reported Leak Rate Failed Tank: 0.00 Gross Leak Rate: Not reported Material Class Type: Petroleum Quantity Spilled: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Spillod: False Units: Pounds Quantity Recovered: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Recovered: False Material: GASOLINE Class Type: _ GASOLINE Times Material Entry In File: 21329 CAS Number: Not. reported Last Date: 19940929 DEC Remarks: 09127195: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill tile: TANK TEST. 01/27197 QUARTERLY REPORT FROM TYREE; BENZENE, XYLENE, BTEX DISCOVERED IN MW 2 3 TRACE AMOUNTS IN 1,4,7,9,10,13,13; 07118/97 QUARTERLY REPORT FROM TYREE; BENZENE, XYLENE, BTEX MW 2 3; 9126197 MW 2 - MTBE 125; BENZENE LO.2 MW 3 - MTBE 14.1; BENZENE 44.2 MW 4 - MTBE 67.5; BENZENE LO.2 12/11/97 QUART'RPT.; PROPOSAL TO DISCONTINUE VES LOOP A AND MODIFY SAMPLE PROGRAM 0112219BLETTER SENT; BASED ON SITE ASSESSMENT REMEDIAL PROPOSAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED; Spill Cause: SUSPECT TANK TOP PLUMBING LEAK TO FIR PETRO-TITE GROSS LEAK Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number: 9106218 Investigator: WADSWORTH Caller Name: Not reported Caller Agency: Not reported Caller Phone: Not reported Caller Extension: Not reported Notifier Name: Not reported Notifier Agency: Not reported Notifier Phone: Not reported Notifier Extension: Not reported Spill Date: 09110/1991 Spill Time: 08:00 Reported to Department Date: 09/10/91 Reported to Department Time: 08:68 SWIS: 13 Spitler Contact: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Exfention: Not reported Spitler Name: SAME Spilier Address: Not reported Spitler City,St,Zip: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported Facility Extention: Not reported Spill Cause: Tank Test Failure Resource Affectd: On Land Water Affected; Not reported Spill Source: Gas Station Spill Notifier: Tank Tester PBS Number: 3-175218 1 TC1831758.2s Page 49 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ED Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number UNAMIED GAS (Continued) S100142119 Cleanup Ceased: 06/18/53 Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: / 1 Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Involvement: True Spill Class: Known release that creates potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken, Spill Closed Dt: 07/15/92 Remedlation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer: 03/05/91 Spill Record Last Update: 08/24/92 Spille Namer: Not reported Spiller Company: SAME Spiller Phone: (914) 834-2046 Spiller Extention: Not reported Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: 77. Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number: 9012435 DER Facility ID: 60876 Site ID: 62876 Operable Unit ID: 952202 Operable Unit: 01 Material ID: 559230 Material Code: 0008 Material Name: Diesel Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 0.00 Units: Not reported Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Groundwater Oxygenate: False Site ID: 62876 Spill Tank Test: 12875 Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size:. 0 Test Method: 00 Leak Rate: 0.00 Gross Fail: Not reported Modified By: Spills Last Modified: 10/01104 Test Method: Unknown DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 9012435 ABANDONED GAS STATION TO E.1,R, ON FRIDAY THE 8TH OF MARCH END CallerRemark - 9012435 Remarks: Start DECRemartc - 9012435 Prior to Sept, 2004 data translation this spill Lead DEC Field was'WADSWORTH" 09/27195: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: TANK TEST. END DECRemark - 9012435 HIST LTANKS: Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number: 9012435 TC1831758.2s Page 51 Map ID „.. Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site UNAMED GAS (Continued) Unkonwn Quantity Recovered: False EOR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S100142119 Material: DIESEL Class Type: DIESEL Times Material Entry In File: 10625 GAS Number: Not reported Last Date: 19940728 DEC Remarks: 09127195: This is additional information about material spilled from the translation of the old spill file: TANK TEST. Spill Cause: ABANDONED GAS STATION TO E.1,11, ON FRIDAY THE 8TH OF MARCH 18 WAPPINGERS FALLS TOYOTA LTANKS', 5104782534 NNW 1420 RT 9 HIST LTANKS N/A 114-112 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 2092 ft. Relative: LTANKS: Lower Site ID: 254688 Spill Date: 10/12/00 Actual: Facility Acl&2: Not reported 193 k., Facility ID: W08342 Program Number: 0008342 SWIS: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: VPMCCABE Referred To: Not reported Reported to Dept: 10/17/00 CID: 19 Spill Cause: Tank Failure Water Affected: Not reported Spill -Source: Commercial/Industrial Spill Notifier: Other Cleanup Ceased: 1 1 Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: 1 1 Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Involvement: False Spill Class: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 10/17/00 Remediation Phase: 0 Date Entered In Computer: 10/17/00 Spill Record Last Update: 08/11/04 Spille Namer: CYNTHIA GREER Spiller Company: WAPPINGERS FALLS TOYOTA Spiller Phone: (845) 223-1816 Spiller Extention: Not reported Spiller Address: RT 9 Spiller City,St,Zip: WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: CYNTHIA GREER Spiller Phone: (845) 223-1816 Spiller Extention: Not reported DEC Region: 3 Program Number: 0008342 DER Facility ID: 208605 Site ID: 254688 Operable Unit ID: 828942 Operable Unit: 01 TC183175B.2s Page 53 Map ID HW Direction { Distance 57684 Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number 3 WAPPINGERS FALLS TOYOTA (Continued) S104782534 2.3 Resource Affectd: On Land 314088 Water Affected: Not reported 1999-11-18 12:00:00 Spill Source: Other Commercial/Industrial 2005-08-10 12:45:00 Spill Notifier. Other PBS Number. 3-601364 Cleanup Ceased: 1 I Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: / / Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended Spiller Cleanup Date: / 1 Enforcement Date: Investigation Complete: 1 / UST Involvement: False Spill Class: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 10/17/00 Date Region Sent Summary to Central Office: 1 / Corrective Action Plan Submitted: 1 I Date Spill Entered to Computer Data File; 10!17100 "Time Spill Entered In Computer Data File: Not reported Spill Record Last Update: 11/28/00 Is Updated: True PBS Number: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank.Slze: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate Failed Tank: Not reported Gross Leak Rate: Not reported Material Class Type: Petroleum Quantity Spilled: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Spilled: True Units: Gallons Quantity Recovered: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Recovered:True Material: WASTE OIL Class Type: WASTE OIL Times Material Entry In File: 9509 CAS Number. Not reported Last Date: 19940927 DEC Remarks: 10/17/2000 HAZ. WASTE REMEDIATION WILL BE HANDLING. SEE SPILL NUMBER 8&00914. SPILLS -NFA 'Spill Cause: GROUND WATER MAY BE IMPACTED ALSO - PIN HOLE FOUND IN TANK - SOIL BEING STOCKPILED . 19 GREER TOYOTA SHWS 5107487874 North 1349 ROUTE 9 N/A 114-1/2 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 2241 ft. Relative: SHWS: Lower Program: HW Site Code: 57684 Actual: Classification: SITE IS PROPERLY CLOSED - REQUIRES CONTINUED MANAGEMENT 192 M Region: 3 Acres: 2.3 HW Code: 314088 Record Add: 1999-11-18 12:00:00 Record Upd: 2005-08-10 12:45:00 TC1831758.2s Page 55 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site GREER TOYOTA (Continued) Owner Address: Not reported Owner Addr2: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: ZZ Owner Country: United States of America Own Op: 01 Sub Type: E Owner name: Not reported Owner Company: Greer Toyota Owner Address: 1420 Route 9 Owner Addr2: Not.reported Owner City,St,Zip: Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 Owner Country: United States of America Own Op: 01 Sub Type: NNN Owner Name: Not reported Owner.Company: Greer Toyota Owner Address: 1420 Route 9 Owner Addr2: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 Owner Country: United States of America Own Op: 04 Sub Type: NNN Owner Name: Not reported Owner Company: Greer Toyota Owner Address: 1420 Route 9 Owner Addr2: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 Owner Country: United States of America Own Op: 04 Sub Type: E Owner Name: Not reported Owner Company: Greer Toyota Owner Address: 1420 Route 9 Owner Addr2: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 Owner Country: United States of America Own Op: 01 Sub Type: E Owner Name: CYNTHIA L. GREER Owner Company: GREER AUTOMOTIVE, LTD Owner Address: 16 BANNERMAN VIEW DRIVE Owner Addr2: Not reported Owner City,St,Zip: WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12550 Owner Country: United States of America HW Code: 314088 Waste Type: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (F001,D001 WASTE) Waste Quantity: UNKNOWN Waste Code: Not reported HW Code: 314088 Waste Type: 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE (F001 WASTE) Waste Quantity: UNKNOWN Waste Code: Not reported Crossref ID: NY0057019762 Cross Ref Type Code: 05 Cross Ref Type: EPA Site ID Record Added Date: 11/18/99 Record Updated: 05/10/01 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S107487874 TC1831758.2s Page 57 °t) Map ID Direction ^' Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Databases) EPA ID Number ALPINE COMMONS PK0 LOT (Continued) 5107523633 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False Site ID: Not reported Spill Tank Test: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate: Not reported Gross Fail: Not reported Modified By,, Not reported Last Modified: Not reported Test Method: Not reported DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 0513075 LARGE STREAK OF BLACK OIL OR FLUID IN PARKING LOT FROM A TRUCK THAT DROVE THROUGH. END CallerRemark _ 0513075 Remarks: Not reported 21 RESIDENCE LTANKS 5102674462 NNW 10 CURRY ROAD HIST LTANKS NIA 114-112 WAPPINGER FALLS, NY 2510 ft. Relative: LTANKS: Lower Site ID: 171627 Spill Date: 07/14/95 Actual: Facility Addr2:. Not reported 181 ft, Facility 1D: 9504487 Program Number: 9504487 SWIS: 1400 Region of Spill: 3 Investigator: VPMCCABE Referred To Not reported -Reported to Dept: 07/14/95 CID: 19 Spill Cause: Tank Overfill Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Private Dwelling Spill Notifier: Responsible Party Cleanup Ceased: 07118195 Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: ! / Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended UST Involvement: False Spill ,Class: Known release with minimal potential for Fre or hazard. DEC Response, Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 07118195 Remediation Phaso: 0 Date Entered In Computer: ! 1 Spill Record Last Update: 12/02103 Sp[Ile Namer: Not reported Spiller Company: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Fxientiow. Not reported Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller Qty,$t,Zip: `'Update•`", 7Z Spiller County: 001 Spiller Contact: Not reported Spiller Phohe: Not reported 4 Spiller Extention: Not reported TC1831758.2s Page 59 . 161 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA 1D Number RESIDENCE (Continued) 8102674462 DEC Region: 3 Program Number. 9504487 DER Facility ID: 144441 Site ID: 171627 Operable Unit ID: 1019233 Operable Unit 01 Material ID: 365999 Material Code: 0001 Material Name: #2 Fuel Oil Case No.: Not reported Material FA: Petroleum Quantity: 1.00 Units: Gallons Recovered: 0.00 Resource Affected: Soil Oxygenate: False Site ID: Not reported Spill Tank Test: Not reported Tank Number: Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported Leak Rate: Not reported Gross Fail: Not reported Modified By:. Not reported Last Modified: Not reported Test Method: Not reported DEC Remarks: Start CallerRemark - 9504487.AREA CLEANED UP BY KOSCO END CallerRemark - 9504487 Remarks: Not reported HIST LTANKS: Region of Spill: 3 Spill Number: 9504487 investigator: McCABE Caller Name: Not reported Caller Agency: Not reported Caller Phone: Not repotted Caller Extension: Not reported Notifier Name: Not reported Notifier Agency: Not reported Notifier Phone: Not reported Notifier Extension: Not reported Spill Date: 0 711 411 99 5 Spill Time: 10:00 Reported to Department Date: 07114/95 Reported to Department Time: 11:57 SWIS: 13 Spiller Contact: Not reported Spiller Phone: Not reported Spiller Extention: Not reported Spiller Name: Not reported Spiller Address: Not reported Spiller City,St,Zip: Not reported Facility Contact: Not reported Facility Phone: Not reported Facility Extention: Not reported Spill Cause: Tank Overfill Resource Affectd: On Land TC1831758.2s Page S0 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site RESIDENCE (Continued) C EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Si02674462 TC1831758.2s Page 61 Water Affected: Not reported Spill Source: Private Dwelling Spill Notifier: Responsible Party PBS Number; Not reported Cleanup Ceased: 07/18/95 Cleanup Meets Standard: True Last Inspection: / I Recommended Penalty: Penalty Not Recommended Spiller Cleanup Date: 1 / Enforcement Date: Investigation Complete: 1 I UST Involvement: False Spilt Class: Known release with minimal potential for fire or hazard. DEC Response. Willing Responsible Party. Corrective action taken. Spill Closed Dt: 07/18/95 Date Region Sent Summary to Central Office: 1 / Corrective Action Plan Submitted: 1 I Date Spill Entered In Computer Data File: 07/18195 Time Spill Entered In Computer Data File: Not reported Spill Record Last Update: / I Is Updated: False PBS Number: Not reported Tank Number.- Not reported Tank Size: Not reported Test Method: Not reported _ Leak Rate Failed Tank: Not reported ( Gross Leak Rate: Not reported Material Class Type: - Petroleum Quanttty Spilled: 1 Unkonwn Quantity Spilled: False Units: Gallons Quantity Recovered: 0 Unkonwn Quantity Recovered: False Material: #2 FUEL OIL Class Type: #2 FUEL OIL Times Material Entry In File: 24464 CAS Number: Not reported Last Date: 19941207 DEC Remarks: Not reported Spill Cause: AREA CLEANED UP BY KOSCO 22 North GREER TOYOTA DEL SHWS S106780899 1420 ROUTE 9 112.1 NIA WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 4173 ft. Relative: DEL SHWS: Lower Year. Not reported Site Code Id: 314088 Actual: Site Classification: 02 151 ft. Region: 3 Epa Id Number: NY0057019762 Site Type - Dump: No Site Type - Structure: No Site Type - Lagoon: No Site Type - Landfill: No Site Type - Treatment Pond: No Site Size (Acres): Not reported TC1831758.2s Page 61 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number GREER TOYOTA (Continued) S106790899 Site Size Comment: Not reported Period Associated With HW Start: Not reported Period Associated With HW End: Not reported Lat/Long: 41:34:47 / 73:54:35 Lat/Long Decimal: Not reported Lat/Long ,(dms): Not reported Hazardous Waste Disposed:, TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (F001,D001 WASTE) Quantity: UNKNOWN 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE (F001 WASTE) UNKNOWN Air Data Available: No Surface Water Std Contravention: No Groundwater Std Contravention: No Soil Type: Not reported Sediment Data Available: No Groundwater Std Contravention:, No Drinking Water Std Contravention: No Surface Water Std Contravention: No Air Standard Contraventions: No Legal Action Type: Not reported State Legal Action: No Federal Legal Action: No Enforcement Status Code: Not reported , Remedial Action Proposed-, No Remedial Action Under Design No Remedial Action In Progress: No Remedial Action Completed: No Remedial Action Type: Not reported Soil Type: Not reported Depth To Groundwater: Not reported Owner Name: GREER 9 REALTY CORPORATION Owner Address: 1420 ROUTE 9 Owner City,St,Zip: Not reported owner Phone: Not reported Owner Contact Name: Not reported Owner During Disposal: GREER9 REALTY CORPORATION Owner During Use: Not reported Operator Name: Not reported Operator Address: Not reported Operator City,St,ZJp: Not reported Operator Phone: Not reported Operator Contact Name: Not reported Operator During Disposal: GREER 9 REALTY CORPORATION Site Type' STRUCTURE Haz Waste Disposal Period: Not reported Analytical Data Available For; Not reported Applicable Std Exceeded In: Not reported Geotech Info: Not reported Depth To Groundwater: Not reported Status: Not reported Nature Of Action: Not reported Env Problems Assessment: Not reported Site Description: Not reported Confirmed Hazardous Waste: Not reported Environment Assesment: Not reported Health Assesment. Not reported Disposal Start Date: Not reported TC1831758.2s Page 62 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site GREER TOYOTA (Continued) Disposal Terminated Date: Air Violation: Groundwater Violation; Drink Water Violation: Surface Water Violation: Legal New York State:. Legal Federal: Legal State: Remedial Action Active: Remedial Action Done; NPL Status: Count Operator: Count Owner: NYTM X: NYTM Y: Co Name: Co Addr: Operator Addr: Operator Addr 2: Operator Addr 3: Operator Addr 4: HWDP From: From To: Assessment Of Health; Environmental Assessment: Haz Waste Disposed/Quantity: Description: Assessment of Env Programs: Assessment of Health Problems: Site Description: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106780899 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Greer Toyota 1420 Route 9 1420 ROUTE 9 1420 Route 9 Not reported Not reported unknown 1993 Not reported Not reported Not reported. Not reported Confirmed groundwater contamination above drinking water standards by tetrachloroethylene, 1,1,1 -trichloroethane and triohloraethylene has been documented, Area drinking water wells are contaminated with chlorinated organic compounds. Carbon filters were installed on wells that were contaminated at levels above drinking water standards. The responsible party is monitoring and maintaining the finer units, There are no other exposure routes as on-site soil contamination is sub -surface. Greer Toyota is an automobile dealership located off Route 9 in Wappingers Falls, NY. The general vicinity of this site has groundwater contamination with halogenated solvents and petroleum products. Several commercial and residential wells in thearea have halogenated solvent contamination: The site has an underground oil -water separator which is connected to a diffuser system. The oil -water separator collected liquid from the floor drains of the site. The oil was manually removed but this practice was recently discontinued. An unknown amount of oil and solvents have been released to the diffuser system and then to the groundwater. Sampling from the oil -water separator revealed tetrachloroethylene (PCE) at 7900 ppb, and 1,1,1 -trichloroethane (TCA) at 3300 ppb. Samples taken in 1991 from area drinking water wells revealed contamination by PCE at levels ranging from, 1.1-12 ppb, TCA from 1.5-20 ppb and trichloroethylene (TCE) from 21-30 ppb. The PRP has installed three carbonfilters; two on residential wells and one on a commercial well that is owned by the PRP and used to supply water to the site. The two remaining wells have been sampled quarterly by the County Department of Health since 1996. In December 1999 the NYSDoH and Dutchess County DoH conducted a drinking well sampling survey downgradient of the site, The sampling data and a feasibility report are under review. Two USTs. (waste oil) were removed from the site in October 2000. Contaminated soils in areas of tanks were not fully removed due to structural constraints. Additional investigation to further characterize soli and groundwater contamination was conducted in August 2001. A proposed TC1831758.2s Page 63 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (8.) Elevation Site GREER TOYOTA (Continued) remedial action plan (PRAP) is under preparation. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S106780899 TC1831758.2s Page 64 LULUW - wLL LL w LL W W U) y 9 Y Z Y Z u U- LL t_wi !w: 0 0 -� T u) Y Y Y � z z z z- z x z z z z wcov,¢ viL aL60000a a a za ¢m w vi0 Q avi r� vim vi to J u) Z Z J Z Z Z Z Z y� i4 ❑zz ❑ J.Z 0 0 0 Z r x Tz Y z z} F-- LL i z�LL LLu.LL LL }? NFi w LL LL li lL u Ll LL z z Z Z = Z [g Of T a CY C9 G () C7 a a C7 C3 W C7 C7 C7 C7 - 0 (7 C7 C9 C7 0 n LL ri vi of �00 0 cy 0w0 C7 ddddd LL 1-- d(iD.fSa(7 cl �' z z=_-�-A YN mmm m u� oua�[N�4K?.`� aaa¢��a'r"ul v�Yzmvj9T19"? m m cn ro N w }�} } ¢ ❑ 7 a a Z, 7 U z Z Z J❑ R' J LL' [�' w' w' tf 4! w Z z z Z S 2 K d' d' OC J a CLQ 0.' K O O O O O O O O O O O O b O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p p 0 0 0 0 0 O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 O Oin LO O rn rn Oi W 0 m m m m m 0 In m m m m O m m rn m m m m rn m m m m m m m m m m rn m 0. V V N N T N N N N N N w N 1[] N N N 0 N N In w N N N N 0 N w N N N N N N N N N N N N ❑ Y w 115K wa O ❑ w � m ❑ n� rn ti� � U � m W a N K o 0 "W' m- J F J w w 5 a to a w Z w w (7 m a W p LL Ix 0 N EL o O0 N O O Z LU Lli � k O. CL rn J = a z ° sasQ LL W m m 0 m a www w � J z rn ❑� w=0w ❑ j d m N Q a�0:Y J y U N r ti m W �.lai m °iS i W W rn V> D U r..a O °LL' W z O p❑j w° Q pa M K wEl� p ay w n ti r d M M— ❑ m w c� cn c. W K rn w F rn rn Q a. w W w O cc m F 4 ❑ N w m rs n W C7 m m c( O L i �' 0.� M 0_' a s w' w' LL' a mN m K x .�- 2 r 2 R' N r N K K vmj ef N❑ rn V! V> w z Ucr, U 0 N Z 0 ¢ m U Y m a N N a U) 2 J O Z QLZJ v>0LL W O >- z z❑ a Do 0' of Qrn4r z zbb u�?= Orin b�L2 LLg z us w�¢ Z ¢ 0w~ w Fh D2: 2OTy wu1 >w C, rUNC7 O 4 V y Z O OF J j u. z H w J z z Gn a LL to J a �.fY z>¢ U W.z w w,z LL 2° wa our q� Z LL z¢ o o g F- o0 n o vri� �Lal�¢ mai mea rOww�U W>z z O EL en .� F�❑���� W Y<n h� cncnU wa-'C= LLaw Nim O❑ vj00 ¢ _ JO w r U¢a Www wrnJ c��UwCO ¢ w j W NE -m rq�wawnw ¢ Z to W w F- 0 0.' U)�� Z � a ¢ z a r � ~ ❑ ❑ ¢ Y � � � � 7 � W�7 p U �.Q O Q4 O w0 KO �w �z woZUdr=i�w v0❑iW wCL 0j ir[umC� Sg-m+w-aGa�JO 030 cc>o�rLLn U � S �� w���3.�o�ccw7z�¢ i�aaNric7�x� ai�csOi, U (U p t9 O 2 m Up O O m w h 6r r O O m m [7 N [� m 0 (A m m N m �+ N m m N O m ti m m 0 t� � co 000 ^ O N O m m M N m 4 7 m N N N �Ny m M p1 N h (� [G O� V O � a0 a m l� ❑ m a0 N N m N M M M N Q' 7 m m N F w N YY N P 7a 1 in N m r T N O a m N m NNN N o P o O 7 N N h m N r 1� N O N h O M r m (p p h in N N } M N N M �o 6 0 0 6 6 p p P 0 P_ O a 0 'r h ❑ P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 O. P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0? 6 O 6 O N O O O O O p W a a a D 7 CO W V) N to. - W N) N N U1 h N U) Sn U1 (n - N - fn ----------- IE - - - - - - - - N N V) V) fn N m m J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J � J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J aa�a¢a¢a¢¢aa¢L<LLL QLL ¢L L aQLL a LL LL, k LL LL LL w LL l.L LL LL w. LL LL LL LL Sl LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL w li. LL LL LL Ell ES �aa�aac����� ���a �affcr cc � w w w w w W W w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w µµ11 w w w w w W J z z z z z C7 (9 z z U' z z z U' C7 C7 C7 C7 U C? C7 (J C7 U' C7 t7 C7 U' [7 [7 C7 C7 U O CO J z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 211 a a d n, m a d a a m M. m 4 f. w n. a a m a `a n. a a a m a a d !L d m 0. m 0. Q b d m m z LL a LL a a< www w a a a a a a a n. w IL- w a a E 3 ���333 33 33 3 ���3��� �3 3 to N m m CL N N m to N 07 U H N, To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. FEDERAL. RECORDS NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1110IM06 Date Made Active in Reports, 11122t2D06 Number of Days to Update: 21 NPL Site Boundaries Sources: Source: EPA Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 1 V01/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact- 01/29/2007 Data Release f=requency: Quarterly EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7.333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 NPL where no further response is appropriate. Telephone 206-553-8665 Date of Government Version: 09/2712006 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1110112006 Date of Government Version: 09/27J2006 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2006 Telephone: NIA Date Made Active In Reports: 11/2212006 Last EDR Contact: 11101/2006 NLimber of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/2912007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 09/2712006 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1110112006 Telephone: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: 11122/2006 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC1831758.2s Page GR -1 NPL RECOVERY: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02102/1994 Telephone: 202-564-4267 Date Made Active in Reports: 0313011994 Last EDR Contact: 11/1712006 Number of Days. to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02119/2007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 0 810 912 0 0 6 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0912112006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/2212006 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-603-8960 Last EDR Contact: 1 211 912 006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived. status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later lime. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is notjudged to be a potential NPL site. . Date of Government Version: loll 012006 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10125/2006 Telephone: 703-603-8960 Date Made Active in Reports: 11122/2006 Last EDR Contact: 12/1812006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Nerd Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS Identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 09/2712006 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2006 Telephone: BOD -424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/1312006 Last EDR Contact: 1210412006 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03105/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information TC1831758.2s Page GR -2 RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRAinfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).. Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 1DO kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off-site to of facility that can recycle, treat, store., or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Goverment Version: 06/1312006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08!2312006 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EOR Contact 12!1312006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/1912007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System_ ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12131/2005 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0 111 212 006 Telephone: 202-260-2342 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/21/2006 Last EDR Contact: 10!24!2006 Number of bays to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/2212007 Data Release Frequency: Annually HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidentsreported to DOT Date of Government Version, 08/0112006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1.0118/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 1112212006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-3664555 Last EDR Contact: 10/1812006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/15/2007 Data Release Frequency. Annually US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place., Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/2112006 Source- Environmental Protection Agency Date. Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2006 Telephone: 703-603-8905 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/22/2006 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Number of Days to Update: 56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/0212007 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to oontaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the Institutional controls. Date of Goverment Version: 03121/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0 312 712 0 0 6 Date Made Active in Reports: 0512212006 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8905 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04102007 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC1831758.2s Page GR -3 DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 649 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004 Source: USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2005 Telephone: 703-692-8801 Date Made Active in Reports: 0 810412 0 0 5 Last EDR Contact: 1111012006 Number of Days to Update: 177 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02105/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12!3112005 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/20/2006 Telephone: 202-528-4285 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2006 Last EDR Contact: 01102/2007 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04102/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites - -Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields- properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments -EPA's Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and. municipalifies--especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots—minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownflelds Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients -States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup. Revolving Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 10/1 712 0 0 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10120/2006 Telephone: 202-566-2777 Date Made Active in Reports: 12113/2006 Last EDR Contact: 12/1112006 Number of Days to Update: 54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact; 03/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites, Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2004 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 04125/2005 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2007 Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/2212007 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing. technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 10/0712006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1 011 3/2 006 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2006 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 01102/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annualty TC1831758.2s Page GR -4 UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was'mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 11104!2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/2812005 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/30/2006 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 1 211 812 006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03!1912007 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06109/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/3112004. Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Number of Days to Update:. 62 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12131/2002 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04114/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 05130=06 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact' 1011812006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01111512007 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts -the ,agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 1 0/1 9120 06 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1 012 712 006 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: I V2212006 Last EDR Contact: 1 211 812 006 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/1912007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FITS INSP: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide ActuTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Date of Government Version: 10/1912006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10127/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2006 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 12118/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/1912007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC183175B.2s Page GR -5 SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year, Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2006 Telephone: 202-564-4203 Date Made Active in Reports: 0512212006 Last EDR Contact: 11107/2006 Number of Days to Update: 11 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01115/2007 data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (I CIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.- Date rogram. Date of Government Version: 02/1312006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2006 Telephone: 202-5645068 Date Made Active in Reports: 05J11 1/2006 Last EDR Contact: 0711712006 Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2006 Data Release Frequency: quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, -transporters, commercial storers andlor brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07107/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/06/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0 2/0 512 00 7 Data Release Frequency: Annually MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to .NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 1011.9/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1 0131 12 0 0 6 Date Made Active in Reports: 1 211 312 006 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: •0110212007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/0212007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of. Government Version: 08/0912006 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/2712006 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 11127/2006 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2006 Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FINDS: Facility Index SystemlFacility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information. System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). TC1831758.2s Page GR -6 Date of Government Version: 10111/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 1211 312 0 0 6 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 01102=07 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 0 411 711 995 Source: EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07103/1995 Telephone: 202-5644104 Date Made Active in Reports: 0810711995 Last EDR Contact: 12104/2006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned t3RS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQGj and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12131/2003 Source: EPAINTIS Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/1712005 Telephone: 800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports: 0810412005 Last EDR Contact: 12115!2006 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Biennially STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS HSWDS: Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site Inventory The list includes any known or suspected hazardous substance waste disposal sites. Also included are sites delisted from the Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites and non -Registry sites that U.S. EPA Preliminary Assessment (PA) reports or Site Investigation (SI) reports were prepared. Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Sites are eligible to be Superfund sites now that the New York State Superfund has been refinanced and changed. This means that the study inventory has served its purpose and will no longer be maintained as a separate entity. The last version of the study inventory is frozen in time. The sites on the study will not automatically be made Superfund sites, rather each site will be further evaluated for listing on the Registry. So overtime they will be added to the registry or not. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2003 Source. Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/2012006 Telephone: 518-402-9564 Date Made Active In Reports: 11130/2006 Last EDR Contact: 11/2712006 Number of Days to Update, 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact, 02/26/2007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York State Referred to as the State Superfund Program, the Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Remedial Program is the cleanup program for Inactive hazardous waste sites and now includes hazardous substance sites Date of Govemment Version: 08/0412006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09114/2006 Telephone: 518-402-9622 Date Made Active in Reports: 1 011 612 006 Last EDR Contact: 1211412006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually DEL SHWS: Delisted Registry. Sites A database listing of sites delisted• from the Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. TC1831758.25 Page GO Date of Government Version: 08I M2006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/1412006 Telephone: 518-402-9622 Date Made Active in Reports; 10116/2006 Last EDR Contact: 12/1412006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03112!2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually SWF/LF: Facility Register Solid Waste FacilWes/Landfill Sites. SWFILF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 10131/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10131/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2006 Number of Days to Update: 30 , SWRCY: Registered Recycling Facility List A listing of recycling facilities. -Date of Government Version: 10131/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1013112006 Date Made Active in Reports: 1113012006 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-457-2051 Last EDR Contact: 10!30!2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01129/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8705 Last EDR Contact 10/30/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/29/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SWTIRE. Registered Waste Tire Storage & Facility List Date of, Government Version: 08/01/2006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2006 Telephone: 518-402-8694 Date Made Active in Reports: 11130/2006 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually LTANKS: Spills Information Database Leaking Storage Tank Incident Reports. These records contain an inventory of reported leaking storage tank incidents reported from 411186 through the most recent update. They can be either leaking underground storage tanks or leaking aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills. Date of Govemment Version: 09/1412006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/2512006 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 1.113012006 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2006 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LTANKS: Listing of Leaking Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground and aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills. In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservatich stopped providing updates to, its original Spills Information Database. This database includes field's that are no longer available from the NYDEC as of January 1, 2002. Current information may be found in the NY LTANKS database. Department of Environmental Conservation. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2002 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2005 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/1412005 Last EDR Contact 07/07/2005 Number of Days to Update: 6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC1831758.2s Page GR -8 UST: Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) Database Facilities that have petroleum storage capacities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,000 gallons. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2006 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/28/2006 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2006 Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01 /22/2007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CBS UST: Chemical Bulk Storage Database Facillties that store regulated hazardous substances in underground tanks of any size Date of Govemment Version-, 01101/2002 Source: NYSDEC Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2002 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/2212002 Last EDR Contact. 10124/2005 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01%23/2006 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MOSF UST: Major Oil Storage Facilities Database Facilities that may be onshore facilities or vessels, with petroleum storage capacities of 400,000 gallons or greater. Date of Govemment'Version: 0110112002 - Source: NYSDEC Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2002 Telephone: 518.402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/2212002 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2005 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10124/2005 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST UST: Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database These facilities have petroleum storage capacities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,000 gallons. This database contains detailed information per site. It is no longer,updated due to the sensitive nature of the information involved. See UST for more current data. Date of Govemment Version: 01/01/2002 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2006 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 0 712 012 0 0 6 Last EDR Contact 10/2312006 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies . AST: Petroieum Bulk Storage Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Govemment Version: 09114/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/2512006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22(2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Last EDR Contact: 10/25/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CBS AST: Chemical Bulk Storage Database Facilities that store regulated hazardous substances in aboveground tanks with capacities of 185 gallons or greater, and/or In underground tanks of any size. Date of Govemment Version: 0110112DD2 Source: NYSDEC Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02120/2002 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 03122/2002 Last EDR Contact: 07125/2005 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2005 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST AST: Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database These facilities have petroleum storage capabilities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,000 gallons. This database contains detailed information per site. No longer updated due to the sensitive nature of the information involved, See AST for more current data. TC1831758.2s Page GR -9 Date of Government Version: 01101/2002 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2006 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2006 Last EDR Contact: 1012312006 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Data Release -Frequency: No Update Planned MOSF AST: Major Oil Storage Facilities Database Facilities that may be onshore facilities or vessels, with petroleum storage capacities of 400,000 gallons or greater. Date of Government Version: 01101/2002 Source: NYSDEC Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2002 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/2212002 Last EDR Contact: 07/2512005 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 1 =412005 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY MANIFEST: -Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility, Date of Government Version: 10/2612006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11-12912006 - Telephone, 518 -402 -8651. - Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2007 Last EDR Contact: 1112912006 Number of Days to Update: 37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually SPILLS: Spills Information Database Data collected on spills reported to NYSDEC as required by one or more of the following: Article 12 of the Navigation Law, 6 NYCRR Section 613.8 (fromPBSrags), or 5 NYCRR Section 595.2 (from CBS regs). It includes spills active as of April 1, 1986, as well as spills occurring since this date. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2006 Source; Department of Environmental Conservation 9 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1012512006 Telephone: 518402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports; 1113=006 Last EDR Contact: 1012512006 Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST SPILLS: SPILLS Database This database contains records of chemical and petroleum spill incidents. Under State law, petroleum and hazardous chemical spills that can impact the waters of the state must to reported by- the spilier (and, in some cases, by anyone who has knowledge of the spills). In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservation stopped providing updates to its original Spills Information Database. This database includes fields that are no longer available from the NYDEC as of January 1, 2002. Current information may be found in the NY SPILLS database. Department of Environmental Conservation. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2002 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07108/2005 Telephone: 518-402-9549 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2005 Last EDR Contact 07/07/2005 Number of Days to Update: 6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ENG CONTROLS: Registry of Engineering Controls Environmental Remediation sites that have engineering controls in place, Date of Government Version: 0 810412 0 0 6 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0 911 412 00 6 Telephone: 518-402-9553 Date Made Active in Reports: 1 011 612 006 Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC1831758.2s Page GR -110 INST CONTROL: Registry of Institutional Controls Environmental Remediation sites that have institutional controls in place. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09114/2006 Telephone: 518-402-9553 Date Made Active in Reports: 10116/2006 Last EDR Contact: 1 211 412 006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/1212007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Agreements New York established its Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) to address the environmental, legal and financial barriers that often hinder the redevelopment and reuse of contaminated properties. The Voluntary Cleanup Program was developed to enhance private sector cleanup of brownfields by enabling parties to remediate sites using private rather than public funds and to reduce the development pressures on "greenfield" sites. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0914412006 Telephone: 518-402-9711 Date Made Active in� Reports: 10116/2006 Last EDR Contact: 1211412006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03112!2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually DRYCLEANERS: Registered Drycleaners A listing of an registered drycieaning facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/1512004 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06111512004 Telephone: 518-402-8403 Date Made Active in Reports: 07129/2004 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2004 Number of Days to Update: 44 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Site List A Brownfield is any real property where redevelopment or re -use may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous waste, petroleum, pollutant, or contaminant. Date of Government Version: 08J04/2006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09114/2006 Telephone: 518-402-9764 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2006 Last EDR Contact: 1211412006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SPDES: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System New York State has a state program which has been approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the control of wastewater and stormwater discharges in accordance with the Clean Water Act. Under New York State law the program is known as the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) and is broader in scope than that required by the Clean Water Act in that it controls point source discharges to groundwaters as well as surface waters. Date of Government Version: 1110812006 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Telephone: 518-402-8233 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/3012006 Last EDR Contact: 11/06)2006 Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02105/2007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Manned AIRS: Air Emissions Data Date of Government Version: 12131/2002 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0911312004 Telephone: 518-402-8452 Date Made Active in Reports: 1 011 B/2004 Last EDR Contact 1 112 012 006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/1912007 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC1831758.2s Page GR -11 INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version; 12/3112004 Source: USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2005 Telephone: 202-208-3710 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2005 Last EDR Contact: 11/10/2006 Number of Days to Update: 177 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02105/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST Rl : Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2006 Source: EPA Region 1 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/0812006 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Date Made Active in Reports: 11108/2006 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2006 Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02J1 912007 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2005 Source: EPA Region 6 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/2112005 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/28/2005 Last EDR Contact: 1111712006 Number of Days to Update: 38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency; Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 0911112006 Source: EPA Region 10 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2006 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2006 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2006 Number of Days to Update: 58 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, Califomia, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 09/06/2006 Source; Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2006 Telephone: 415-972-3372 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2006 Last EDR' Contact: 1 111 712 006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09106/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2006 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 1111719006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quartedy INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 09/06/2006 Date Data Arrived. at EDR: 10/04/20D6 Date Made Active in Reports: 11108/2006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 9135517003 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC1831758.2s Page GR -12 INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 08/24/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0911 112 00 6 Date Made Active in Reports: 11!0812006 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 1 111 7/2 00 6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/1912007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version: 08!2412006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01312006 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 11117!2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Govemment Version: 09/06/2006 Source: EPA Region 7 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1010412006 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Date Made Active in Reports; 111.08/2006 Last EDR Contact: 111/1 7=06 06 Number of,Days to Update, 35 Next'Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version: 0 910 612 0 0 6 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/0812006 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone; 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/1912007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version: 0911 W006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0911112006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/08/2006 Number of Days to Update: 58 . Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 11 /1 712 006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN.UST R'5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version: 12102/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 02104/2005 Number of Days to Update; 37 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 11117/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0 2/1 91200 7 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST Re: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version: 0813012006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 111/0812006 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version: 08/28/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0812912006 Date Made Active In Reports: 11108126D6 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 11117/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0211912007 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC1831758.2s Page GRA1 INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 09!0712006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0910=006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11108/2006 Number of Days to Update: 61 EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 11!1712006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02119/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of sell and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: NIA Date Data Arrived at EDR: NIA Date Made Active in Reports: NIA Number of Days to Update: NIA COUNTY RECORDS CORTLAND COUN'T'Y: Cortland County Storage Tank .Listing f Date of Government Version: 09/20/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0912812006 Date Made Active In Reports: 11106/2006 Number of Days to. Update: 39 Cortland County Storage Tank. Listing Date of Govemment Version: 09/20/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/28/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11106/2006 Number of Days to Update: 39 NASSAU COUNTY: Registered Tank Database Source: EDR, Inc, Telephone: N/A Last ED.R Contact: NIA Next Scheduled EDR Contact', NIA Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Cortland County Health Department Telephone: 607-753-5035 Last EDR Contact: 1112712006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0212612007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Cortland County Health Department Telephone: 607-753-5035 Last EDR Contact: 11 /27/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Government Version: 05121/2003 Source: Nassau County Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0512712003 Telephone: 516-571-3314 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2003 Last EDR Contact: 1 013 112 0 06 Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0112912007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Storage Tank Database TC1831758,2s Page GR -14 Date of Government Version: 06/28t2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0712812006 Date Made Active in Reports: 0812112006 Number of Days to Update: 24 Storage Tank Database Date of Government Version: 0612812006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2006 Number of Days to Update: 24 Registered Tank Database Date of Government Version: 0512112003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05127!2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06109/2003 Number of Days to Update: 13 ROCKLAND COUNTY: Petroleum Bulk Storage Database Date of Govemment Version: 1012412006 Date Data Arrived at EDR; 10/24/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 1111412006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Petroleum Bulk Storage Database Date of Government Version: 10/24t2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 1012412006 Date Made Active in Reports: I III 3 2006 Number of Days to Update: 20 SUFFOLK COUNTY: Storage Tank Database Date of Government Version: 06/2112005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0911 912 00 5 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/0312005 Number of Days to Update: 45 Storage Tank Database Date of Government Version: 06/21/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09119/2605 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2005 Number of Days to Update: 45 WESTCHESTER COUNTY: Q Source: Nassau County Office of the Fire Marshal Telephone: 516-572-1000 Last EDP Contact: 01/0512007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02105/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Nassau County Office of the Fire Marshal Telephone: 516-572-1000 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/05/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Nassau County Health Department Telephone; 516-571-3314 Last EDR Contact: 1 013 112 0 06 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/2912007 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source; 'Rockland County Health Department Telephone: 914-364-2605 Last EDR Contact; 01/02/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04102J200.7 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Rockland County Health Department Telephone: 914-364-2605 Last EDR Contact: 01!0212007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0410212007 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Telephone: 631-854-2521 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0212612007 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Telephone: 631-854-2521 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC1831758.2s Page GR -15 Listing of Storage Tanks Listing of aboveground storage tanks in Westchester County. Date of Government Version: 05/05/2005 Source: Westchester County Department of Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/3112005 Telephone: 914-813-5161 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/3012005 Last EDR Contact: 1112712006 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/26/2007 Data Release Frequency: Varies Listing of Storage Tanks Listing of underground storage tanks in Westchester County. Date of Government Version: 05!05/2005 Source: Westchester County Department of Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2005 Telephone: 914-813x161 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/30/2005 Last EDR Contact: 11 /2712006 Number of Days to Update: 30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/2612007 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 12!31{2004 Source: Department of Environmental Protection 1 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02117/2006 Telephone: 860-424-3375 l Date Made Active in Reports: 04107/2006 Last EDR Contact: 12/1112006 Number of Days to Update: 49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11 /1312006 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/13/2006 Number of Days to Update; 30 PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 1 213112 0 0 5 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 0311 7/2 0 0 6 Date Made Active in Reports: 06106/2006 Number of Days to Update: 81 RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone; NIA Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0410212007 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: Department of Environmental Proteotion Telephone: NIA Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/1212007 Data Release Frequency: Annually Date of Government Version: 04111/2006 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2006 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/1812006 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2006 Number of Days to Update: 48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2007 Data Release Frequency: Annually T01831758.2s Page GR -16 VT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version; 12131/2005 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2006 Telephone; 802-241-3443 Date Made Active in Reports: 07131/2006 Last EDR Contact I V1312006 Number of Days to Update: 32 Next Scheduled EDR Contact; 0211212007 Data Release Frequency: Annually Wt MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12J31/2005 Source: Department of Natural Resources Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03117/2006 Telephone: NIA Date Made Active in Reports; 05/02/2006 Last EDR Contact 01/08/2007 Number of Days to Update: 46 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0410912007 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oi11Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000 -Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Ele,L4ic Power Transmission Line Data Source, PennWell Corporation Telephone: (800) 823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information Is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does notguaranteeits accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the,locatlon of alt sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. ANA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospltals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States.. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers, Day Care Providers Source: Department of Health Telephone: 212-676-2444 TC1831758.2s Page GR -17 l Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year Flood zones as defined by FEMA. NW[; National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Freshwater Wetlands Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8961 Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2007 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc- The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC1831758.2s Page GR -18 TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS 154 OLD POST ROAD 154 OLD POST ROAD WAPINGERS, NY 12590 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (worth): 41.57340 - 41' 34' 24.2" Longitude (West): 73.9.085 - 73' 54'30-6" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 18 UTM X (Meters): 590999.8 UTM Y (Meters): 4602775.5 Elevation: 242 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: 41073-E8 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY Most Recent Revision: 1981 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration_ Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: i 1: Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby welts. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. T01831758.2s Page A-1 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted_ TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General WNW SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES 9 c 0 N a LU... V. Za1,• _ OFA � s w W North South .TP N iA ti ml�� WestTP East p 112 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 242 ft. Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. i TC18317582s Page A-2 HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic Information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County DUTCHESS,NY Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Prope WAPPINGERS FALLS FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 3613870010A 3613870015A NWI Electronic Data Coveraqe Not Available HYDROQEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeologlcal Data": Search Radius: 1.25 miles Status: Not found AQUIFLOW§ Search. Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported • of 996 %=9 .� Rte. prone r�an�p.erus hn sne LIeylpry it MmG ONE I=y c FT MM,SrI� raservea. ra u the n —lWn end *n4 a n M—M d M U ms d tM dead EPA mpmgs}, Wkh w mm*lad WKW >Yrveallpeean. TC1831758.2s Page A-3 f I GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Paleozoic Category: Stratified Sequence System: Ordovician Series: Middle Ordovician (Mohawkian) Code: 02 (decoded above as Era, System &Serres) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P -G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC1831758.2s Page A-4 2 I argot tjroperty SSURGO Soil %'v Water SSURGO SOIL MAP -1831758.2s tj I II tttc lie ;(A tvL'ks ..,:.,...:. SITE NAME: 154 Oki Past Road CLIENT: Conrad Geoscience Corporation ADDRESS: 154 Oki Post Road CONTACT: Andria Quinn Wapingers NY 12590 INQUIRY #: 1831758.2s LAT/LONG: 41,5734173,9085 DATE: January09, 2007 1:30 pm Dapytlpht* ZW7 FGR, Ino. 9 2W7 Tele Atlar Rel. 070U6. `:01 DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: DUTCHESS Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to Classification water table is more than 6 feet. Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: LOW Depth to Bedrock Min_ > 60 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches TC1831758.2s Page A-6 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class -AASHTO Group Unified Soil Rate Permeabil(inihr) it Soil Reaction 1 0 inches $inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.00 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50 than 35 pct Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. 2 8 inches 28 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.00 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. 3 28 inches 86 inches channery - silt SIIt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50 . loam Materials (more SOILS, Slits and Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. TC1831758.2s Page A-6 Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name: DUTCHESS Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Upper textures. Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to Unified Soil water table is more than 6 feet. Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: LOW Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches Sol] Layer Information Boundary. Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction Rate (in/hr) (pH) 1 0 inches 8 inches silt loam SiltclayFINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.00 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. 2 8 inches 28 inches silt loam Sllt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.00 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50 than 35 pct. Clays (liqu€d passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt, Soils. 3 28 inches 86 inches channery - silt Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50 loam Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 5.10 than 35 pct_ Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%). silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: URBAN LAND variable Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse textures. Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to water table is more than 6 feet. TC18317582s Page A-7 Hydric Status: Soil has not been ranked with a hydric criteria. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 10 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 10 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil 1 0 inches 6 inches variable Not reported Not reported 'ermeabilit Soil Reaction tate (In/hr) (pH) Max' 0.00 Max: 0.00 Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00 LOCAL I REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration .on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE miles Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION TC1831758.2s Page A-8 LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 USGS2122913 0 - 118 Mile North 2 USGS2122962 114 - 112 Milo NNW A3 USGS2122958 114 - 112 Mile NW A4 USGS2122959 114 - 112 Mile NW C8 USGS2122928 112 -1 Mile ENE C9 USGS2122929 112- 1 Mile ENE D10 USGS2123032 112 - 1 Mile East USGS2123031 112 - 1 Mile East .011 18 USGS2123035 112 - 1 Mile West 20 USGS2123151 112 - 1 Mile SSE H21 USGS2123141 112 - 1 Mile South H22 USGS2123140 112 - 1 Mile South 24 USGS2123142 112 -11 Mile South 27 USGS2122810 112 - 1 Mile NW TC1831758.2s Page A-8 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 28 USGS2123121 112 -1 Mile South FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION TC1831758.2s Page A-9 LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 135 NY0002782 1/4 - 112 Mile NNW Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION RAP ID , WELL ID FROM TP. 136 NYWS004376 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNW 137 NYWS004375 114 - 1/2 Mile NNW E12 NYWS004402 112 - 1 Mile SW E13 NYWS004401 112 -1 Mile SW F14 NYW8004412 112 - 1 Mile SSE FIS NYWS004411 112- 1 Mile SSE G16 NYWS004414 112 - 1 Mile South G17 NYWS004413 112 - 1 Mile South 19 NYWS004409 11/2- 1 Mile SE 123 NYWS004351 1/2 -1 !vole NNE 125 NYWS004350 112 - 1 Mile NNE 126 NYWS004346 112 - 1 Mile NNE TC1831758.2s Page A-9 PHVAICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -1831758.2s // County Boundary /v Major Roads Contour Lines @O E=arthquake epicenter, Richter b or greater Water Wells g Public Water Supply Wells g Cluster of Multiple Icons Groundwater Flow Directicn Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location z r V Groundwater Flow Varies at Location CGID Closest Hydrogeological Data 0 oil, gas or related wells SITE NAME: 154 Oki Past Load CLIENT: Conrad GeoscienCO Corporation ADDRESS: 154 Old Post Road CONTACT: Andria Quinn Wapingers NY 12590 INQUIRY #: 101758.2s LATILONG: 41.5734173.9085 DATE: January 09, 2007 1:30 pm Copyright 07607 EDR, Im S M07 Tab Attic Rel. 0742096. Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR iD Number 1 North FED USGS USGS2122913 0 -118 Mile Lower Agency cd: USGS Site no: 413430073543401 Site name: DU 343 Latitude: 413429 Longitude: 0735433 Dec ]at: 41.57481581 Dec Ion: -73.9087477 Coor meth: M Coor accr: T Latfong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: us Land net: Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: Not Reported Altitude: 240.00 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 10 Attitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: HudsonWappinger. New York. Area = 928 sq,mi. Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 19000101 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Type of groundwater site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer. ORDOVICIAN SYSTEM Well depth: 160 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: Not Reported Project number. 443600701 Real time data flag: 0 Daily tow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data and date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Peak How data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Ground water data begin date: 1959-01-01 Ground water data end date' 1959-01-01 Ground water data count: 1 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 2 NNW 114 -112 Mile FED USGS USGS2122962 Lower Agency cd: USGS Site no: 413439073543701 Site name: DU 1836 Latitude: 413439 Longitude: 0735437 Dec lat: 41.57759359 Dec Ion: -73.90985884 Coor meth: M Coor accr: T Latlong datum: NA027_ Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: US Land net: Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Altitude: 198 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwlch time offset: EST TC1831758.2s PageA-10 Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Site no: Site name: Aquifer. BEDROCK Latitude: 413438 Well depth: 100 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: other reported Coor meth: Coor acct: Project number 443600701 Dec lationg datum: NAD83 Real time data flag: Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data end date: Not Reported Peak flow data count Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported Water quality data end date -.Not Reported Water quality data count: Not Reported Ground water data begin date: Not Reported Ground water data end date: Not Reported Ground water data count: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 A3 NW 114-112 Mile Lower Agency cd: USGS Site no: Site name: DU1513 Not Reported Latitude: 413438 Well depth: Longitude: 0735447 Dec let: Dec Ion: -73.91263672 Coor meth: Coor acct: T Latlong datum: Dec lationg datum: NAD83 District: State: 36 County: Country: us Land net Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4. Map scale: Altitude: 160 Altitude method Attitude accuracy: 5 Altitude datum: Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported FED USGS USGS212295B 413438073544701 41.57731581 M NAD27 36 027 Not Reported 24000 M NGVD29 Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 19570715 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: BEDROCK Well depth: 125.00 Hole depth: Source of depth data: other reported Project number. 443600701 Not Reported Real time data flag: ' 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Groundwater data begin date: 1957-07-15 Ground water data end date: 1957-07-15 Ground water data count: 1 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 A4 NW FED USGS USGS2122959 114 -112 Mile Lower TC1831758.2s Page A-11 Agency cd: USGS Site no: 413438073544702 Site name: DU1614 Latitude: 413438 Longitude: 0735447 Dec lat: 41.57731581 Dec Ion: _73.91263672 Coor meth: M Coor accr:. T Lationg datum. NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NA083 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: us Land net: Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Altitude: 460 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 1979 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: BEDROCK Well depth: 400.00 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: other reported Project number: 443600701 Real time data flag: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Ground water. data begin date. 1979-11-06 Ground water data end date: _.11979-11-08 Groundwater data count: 1 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 B5 NNW FRDS PWS NY0002782 114 -112 Mile Lower PWS ID: NY0002782 PWS Status: Active Date Initiated: Not Reported Date Deactivated: Not Reported PWS Name: WAPPINGER PARK HOMES WAPPINGERS FALL, NY 12590 Addressee /Facility: System Owner/Responsible Party SMfTH CONSTANCE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN HALL PO BOX 324 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12602 Addressee / Facility: System Owner/Responsible Party SMITH CONSTANCE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF WAPPINGER TOWN HALL PO BOX 324 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12602 Facility Latitude: 4134.43 Facility Longitude: 073 54 40 TC1831758.2s Page A-12 Facility Latitude: 41 3443 City Served: WAPPINGER Treatment Class Not Reported PWS currently has or had major violations) or enforcement: Facility Longitude: 073 54 40 Population: Not Reported No 66 Site no: NNW DU1609 114 -112 Mile Lower Dec lat: Well id: NY1302782 System name: System Id: 001 Well name: Type: WL Active?: County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: Longitude: 735440 000 Slec_type_: Agency: WAPPINGER TOWN SUPERVISOR AND BOARD Address: 20 MIDDLEBUSH ROAD PO BOX 324 CltylState2ip: WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 Phone: Not Reported B7 250 _ NNW M 114 -112 Mile Altitude datum: Lower Not Reported Well Id: NY13.02782 System name: System Id: 002 Well name: Type. WL Active?: County: DUTCHESS'COUNTY Latitude: Longitude: 735440 000 Slec type_ Agency: WAPPINGER TOWN SUPERVISOR AND BOARD Address: 20 MIDDLEBUSH ROAD PO BOX 324 City/Statelzip' WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 Phone: Not Reported CS ENE 112 •1 Mile Higher Agency cd.: Site name: Latitude: Longitude: Dec Ion: Coor aocr: Dec latlong datum: State: Country: Location map: Altitude: Altitude accuracy: Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date. inventoried: NY WELLS NYWS004376 WAPPINGER PARK HOMES WELL 1 A 413443 000 AC NY WELLS NYWS004375 WAPPINGER PARK HOMES WELL 2 A 413443 000 AC. FED USGS USGS2122928 USGS Site no: 413433073535801 DU1609 413433 0735358 Dec lat: 41 .57692691 -73.89902514 Coor meth: M T Latlong datum: NAD27 MAD83 District: 36 36 County: 027 US Land net: Not Reported WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 250 _ Altitude method: M 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Not Reported Not Reported Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST TC1831758,2s Page A-13 Local standard time flag; N Site no: 413433073535802 Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported 413433 Aquifer: BEDROCK 0735358 Dec lat Well depth: 270.00 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: other reported T Latlong datum: Project number: 443600701 NAD83 District: Real time data Flag: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data end date: 0000.00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Peak fldw data count: 0 Water quality data begin date; 0000-00-00 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Ground water data begin date: 1971-08-02 Ground water data end date: 1971-08-02 Ground water data count: 1 Topographic:, Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 C9 ENE FED USGS USGS2122929 112 -11 Mile Higher Agency cd: USGS Site no: 413433073535802 Site name: DU1610 Latitude: 413433 Longitude: 0735358 Dec lat 41.57592691 Dec Ion: -73.89902514 Coormeth: M Coor accr:, T Latlong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum:. NAD83 District: 36 State: 36. County: 027 Country: Us Land net Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Attitude: 250 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic:, Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer. BEDROCK Well depth: 270.00 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: other reported - Project number: 443600701 Real time data flag: 0 Daily Bow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date_ 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Groundwater data begin date: 1973-05-01 Ground water data end date: 1973-05-01 Ground water data count: 1 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 D10 East FED USGS USGS2123032 112 -11 Mile Higher TG1831758.2s Page A-14 Agency od: USGS Site no: 413419073535402 Site name: DU1612 0735354 Dec lat: Latitude: 413419 T Latlong datum: Longitude: 0735354 Dee lat: 41.57203802 Dec ion: -73.897914 Coor meth: M Coor aocr. T Latlong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: us Land net: Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Altitude: 250 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: ' 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring. Date construction: Not Reported Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney.type, Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: BEDROCK Well depth: Not Reported Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: Not Reported Project number: 443600701 Real time data flag: Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: - Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data end date: Not Reported Peak flow data count: Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported Water quality data end date:Not Reported Water quality data count: Not Reported Ground water data begin date: Not Reported Ground water data end date: Not Reported Ground water data count: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 oil East 112 -1 Mile Higher Agency cd: Site name: Latitude: Longitude: Dec Ion: Coor accr: Dec laflong datum: State: Country: Location map: Altitude: Altitude accuracy: Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type' Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data: I Project number: Real time data flag' Daily flaw data end date: Peak flow data begin date: USGS Site no: DU1611 IN 413419 0735354 Dec lat: -73.897914 Coor meth: T Latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 County: US Land net: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 250 Altitude method: 5 Altitude datum: Not Reported 0000-00-00 Not Reported Daily flow data count: FED USGS USGS2123031 413419073535401 41.57203802 M NAD27 36 027 Not Reported 24000 M NGVD29 Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST IN Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported BEDROCK 165.00 Hole depth: Not Reported other reported 443600701 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end data: 0000-00-00 TC1831758.2s Page A-15 Peak flow data count; 0 Water quality data begin date: 000()-10-00 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Ground water data begin date: 1973-04-16 Ground water data end date: 1973-0416 Ground water data count: 1 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements; 0 E12 SW NY WELLS NYWS004402 112 -1 Mile Lower Well d: NY1330431 System name: MANHATTAN .DELI System Id: WL7 Well name: WELL #1 Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: 413400.751 Longitude: 735500:031 Slec_type_. AC Agency: HAYTHAMI, KHALIL Address: 15.0 OLD HOPEWELL RD City/5tate/7ip: WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 Phone: 845-297-8181 E13 SW NY WELLS NYWS004401 112 -1 Mile Lower Well Id: NY1330376 _ System name: DB MART System Id: WL7 Well name: WELL #1 Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: 413400.839 Longitude: 735500.815 Siec type : AC Agency: HUGHSONVILLE MART 6614 INC Address: PO BOX 567 RT 9D NEW HAMBURG RD City/State/Zip: HUGHSONVILLE NY 12537 Phone: 845-297-9967 F14 SSE NY WELLS NYWS004412 112 -1 Mile Higher Well Id: NY1310668 System name: BIRCHWOOD MOBILE HOME PARK System Id: 001 Well name: WELL#1 Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: 413349 000 Longitude: 735413 000 Slec_type_: AC Agency: HENZLEtR, WERNER Address: 103 SMITHTOWN RD City/Statemp: FISHKILL NY 125242436 Phone: 645-896-6541 F15 SSE NY WELLS NYWS004411 112 -1 Mite Higher TC1831758.2s Page A-16 Well Id: NY1310668 System name: BIRCHWOOD MOBILE HOME PARK System Id: 002 Well name: WELL #2 Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: 413349 000 Longitude: 735413 000 Slec_type_: AC Agency: HENZLER, WERNER Address: 103 SMITHTOWN RD CitylState/Zip: FISHKILL NY 125242436 Phone: 845-896-6541 G16 South NY WELLS NYWS004414 112 -1 Mile Higher Well Id: NY1305069 System name: DUTCHESS MOBILE HOME PARK System Id; W002 Well name: WELL 92 AUXILIARY Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS. COUNTY Latitude: 413346 000 Longitude: 735434 000 Slec_type` AC Agency: WHITE, CLARENCE Address: 32 OSBORNE HILL RD CglStatetzip: WAPPINGER FALLS NY 12590 Phone: Not Reported G17 South NY WELLS NYWS004413 112 -1 Mile Higher Well Id: NY1305069 System name: DUTCHESS MOBILE HOME PARK System Id: W001 Well name: WELL #1 Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: 413346 000 Longitude: 735434 000 Slec type_: AC Agency: WHITE, CLARENCE Address: 32 OSBORNE HILL RD - City/StatelZip: WAPPINGER FALLS NY 12590 Phone: Not Reported 18 West FED USGS USGS2123035' 112-1 Mile Lower Agency od: USGS Site no: 413420073552601 Site name: DU 453 - Latitude: 413420 Longitude: 0735526 Dec let: 41.57231582 Dec Ion: -73.92347044 Coor meth: M Coor accr. T Latlong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NA083 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: US Land net: Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: Not Reported TC1831758.2s Page A-17 Altitude: 180.00 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 10 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: HudsonWappinger. New York. Area = 928 sq.mi. System Id: Topographic: Not Reported WL County: Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 19000101 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Not Reported 20 Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Higher Aquifer: TILL Site name: DU1625 Well depth: 21.0 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: Not Reported Coor accr: T Project number. 443600701 State: 36 Real time data flag: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 ..Dai[y stow data end date: 0000-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-.00 Peak flow data and date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data begin date: 0000 -00 -OG Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Groundwater data begin date: 1959-01-01 Ground water data end date: 1959-01-01 Ground water data count: 1 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 19 HAMPTON BUSINESS CENTER SE WELL 001 112 - i Mile A Higher 413355 000 Well 'Id: NY1322550 System Id: 001 Type: WL County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Longitude: 735352 000 Agency: LPV ASSOCIATES Address: 1611, Rt. 9" Clfy/Statelzip: WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 Phone: Not Reported 20 SSE . 112-1 Mile Higher Agency cd: USGS Site name: DU1625 Latitude: 413346 Longitude: 0735409 Dec Ion: -73.90208084 Coor accr: T Dec ialiong datum: NAD83 State: 36 Country: US Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Altitude: 260 Altitude accuracy: 5 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date inventoried: Not Reported NY WELLS NYWS004409 System name:- HAMPTON BUSINESS CENTER Well name: WELL 001 Active?: A Latitude: 413355 000 Slec_type_., AC FED USGS USGS2123151 Site no: 413346073540901 Dec latt 41.56287136 Coor meth: M Latlong datum: NAD27 District: 36 County: 027 Land net: Not Reported Map scale: 24000 Altitude method: M Altitude datum: NGVD29 Date construction: 1960 Mean greenwich time offset: EST TC1831758.2s Page A 18 Local standard time flag: N Site no: 413342073543802 Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported 413342 0735438 Dec tat: Aquifer: Well depth: BEDROCK 200.00 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: other reported T NAD83 District. Project number: 443600701 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: 00.00-00-00 Daily flow data count: 0 Peak flow data begin date: 0000-00-00 Peak flow data end date: Water quality data begin date: 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 Peak flow data count: 0 Water quality data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count: 0 Ground water data begin date.: 1960-07-00 Ground water data end date: 1960-07-00 Ground water data count: 1 Topographic: Site type: Not Reported Ground -water other than Spring Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 H21 FED USGS USGS2123141 South 112 -1 Mite Higher Agency cd: USGS Site no: 413342073543802 Site name: DU 1626 Latitude: Longitude: 413342 0735438 Dec tat: 41.56176026 Dec Ion: -73.91013667 Coor meth: Laflong datum: M NAD27 Coor accr: Dec latlong datum: T NAD83 District. 36 State: 36 County: Land net: 027 Not Reported Country: Location map: US WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Altitude: 240 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy:' 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Site type: Not Reported Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 19560000 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST. Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aqulfer: BEDROCK Hole depth: Not Reported Well depth: 179.00 Source of depth data: other reported Project number: Real time data flag: 443600701 Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Peak flow data end date: Not Reported Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data count: Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported Water quality data end date:Not Reported Water quality data count: Not Reported Ground water data begin date: Not Reported Ground water data end date: Not Reported Ground water data count: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 H22 FED USGS USGS2123140 South 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TG1831758.29 Page A-19 Agency od: USGS Site no: 413342073543801 Site name: DU1526 NY WELLS NYWS004351 Latitude: 413342 Longitude: 0735438 Dec ]at: 41.56176026 Dec Ion: -73.91013667 Coor meth: M Coor accr: T Latlong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: US Land net: Not Reported Location reap: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Altitude: 240 Altitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 5 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 19590000 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard lime flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer. BEDROCK Well depth: 136.00 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: other reported Project number: 443600.701 Real time data flag: Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data end date: . Not Reported Peak flow data count: Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported. Water quality data end date:Not Reported Water quality data count: Not Reported Ground water data -begin date: Not Reported Ground water data and date: Not Reported Ground water data count: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 123 NNE 112 -1 Mile • NY WELLS NYWS004351 Lower Well Id: NY1330419 System name: MOBIL MART 17LA6 System Id: WL1 Well name: WELL #1 Type: WL Active?: A County: DUTCHESS COUNTY Latitude: 413500.371 Longitude: 735400.43 Stec type_: AC Agency: SARIGHT ENTERPRISES INC Address: 1277 RT 9 City/State/Zip: WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 Phone: 845-298-8621 24 South FED USGS USGS2123142 112 -1 Mile Lower TC1831758.2s Page A-20 Agency cd: USGS Site no:' 413342073544301 Site name: DU 329 Latitude: Longitude: 413342 0735443 Dec lat: 41.56176026 Dec Ion: -73.91152561 Coor meth: M Coor accr. T Latlong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 State: 36 County: Land net: 027 Not Reported Country: Location map: US WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: Not Reported Altitude: 200,00 Attitude method: M Altitude accuracy: 10 Altitude datum: NGVD29 Hydrologic: HudsonWappinger. New York. Area = 928 sq.mi. Topographic: Site type: Not Reported Ground -water other than Spring construction: 19000101 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Mea EST Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: ORDOVICIAN SYSTEM Hole depth: Not Reported Well depth: 123 Source of depth data: Not Reported Project number: Real time data flag: 443600701 Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data end date: Not Reported Peak flow data count: Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported Water quality data end date:Not Reported Water quality data taunt: Not Reported Ground water data begin date: Not Reported Ground water data end date: Not Reported �— Ground water data count: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 125 NY WELLS NYWS004350 NNE 112 -1 Mile Lower Well Id: NY1330392, System name: GETTY MART WAPPINGER FL System Id: WL1 Well name: WELL #1 Type: County: WL DUTCHESS COUNTY Active?: Latitude: A 413500.497 Longitude: 735400.537 Slec_type_: AC Agency: WAPPINGERS FALLS GETTY SRV ST I Address: 1250 RT 9 City/State/zip: WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 Phone: 845-297-9522 126 NY WELLS NYWS004346 NNE 112 -1 Mile Lower TC1831758.2s Page A-21 Well Id: NY1330386 System name: System Id: WL1 Well name: Type: WL Active?: County: DUTGHESS COUNTY Latitude: Longitude: 735400.684 Slec_type_: Agency: GREWALL CORP Latlong datum: Address: 1163 RT 9 District: City/StatelZip: WAPPINGES FALLS NY 12590 County: Phone: 8455-298-1496 Land net: 27 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Agency cd: USGS Site no: Site name: DU 341 N Latitude: 413452 Aquifer Type: Longitude: 0735522 Dec lat: Dec Ion:, -73.92235927 Coor meth: Coor acct. T Latlong datum: Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: State: 36 County: Country: US Land net: Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: Altitude: 180.00 Altitude method: Altitude accuracy: 10 Attitude datum: Hydrologic: HudsonWappinger. New York. Area '= 928.sq.mi. Topographic: Not Reported FOODWAY CONVENIENT WELL #1 A 413500.991 AC FED USGS USGS2122810 413455073551801 41.58120471 M NAD27 36 027 Not Reported Not Reported M' NGVD29 Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: 19000101 Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: EST Local standard time flag: N Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer. ORDOVICIAN SYSTEM Well depth: 42.0 Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: Not Reported Project number, 443600701 Real time data flag: Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data end date: Not Reported Peak flow data count Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported Water quality data end date: Not Reported Water quality data count: Not Reported Ground water data begin date: Not Reported Ground water data end date: Not Reported Ground water data count Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 28 South FED USGS USGS2123121 112 -1 Mile Higher TC1831758.2s Page A-22 Agency cd: USGS Site no, 413334073543101 Site name: DU1327 Latitude: 413334 Longitude: 0735431 Dec let: 41.55953803 Dec Ion: -73.90819217 Coor meth: M Coor accr: T Latlong datum: NAD27 Dec latlong datum: NAD83 District: 36 State: 36 County: 027 Country: US Land net: Not Reported Location map: WAPPINGERS FLS 025-4 Map scale: 24000 Altitude: Not Reported Altitude method: Not Reported Altitude accuracy: Not Reported Altitude datum: Not Reported Hydrologic: Not Reported Topographic: Not Reported Site type: Ground -water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Date inventoried: Not Reported Mean greenwich Gme offset: EST Local standard time flag: N .Type of ground water site: Single well, other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: Not Reported Well depth: Not Reported Hole depth: Not Reported Source of depth data: Not Reported Project number: 443600701 Real time data flag: Not Reported Daily flow data begin date: Not Reported Daily flow data end date: Not Reported Daily flow data count: Not Reported Peak flow data begin date: Not Reported Peak flow data end date: Not Reported Peak flow data count: Not Reported Water quality data begin date: Not Reported Water quality data end date -Not Reported Water quality data count: Not Reported 6 Ground water data begin date: Not Reported Ground water data end date: Not Reported Ground water data count Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 TC1831758.2s Page A-23 AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: NY Radon Radon Test Results Zip Num Sites < 4 Pci/L ' >= 4 Pci/L 12590 309 193(62.5%) 113(36,6%) 12590 1 1(100%) 0(0%) 12590 1 1(100%) 0(0%) >= 20 Pci1L Avg > 4 Pci/L Max PcVL 3(1%) 4.29 33.0 0(0%) 2.40 2.4 0(0%) 1.20 12 Federal EPA Radon Zone for DUTCHESS County: 1 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level >- 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi1L. Federal Area Radon Information for DUTCHESS COUNTY, IVY Number of sites tested: 186 Area Average Activity % <4 pCVL Living Area 1.690 pCi1L 80% Basement 3.636 pCi/L 56% %4-20 pCi/L %>20 pCi/L 20% 0% 38°/a 6% TC1831758.2s Page A-24 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle ina.ps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator(UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR. in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State Wetlands Data: Freshwater Wetlands Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8961 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR. Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUI FLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B, King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (S$URGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management, TC1831758,2s Page A-25 LOCAL/ REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water. Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to. at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF; Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone; 202-.564-3750 Violation and.Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Welts: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surbee water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data Includes Information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS New York Public Water Wells Source: New York Department of Health Telephone: , 518-458-6731 Oil and Gas Well Database Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8056 These files contain records, in the database, of wells that have been drilled. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION — RADON State Database: NY Radon Source: Department of Health Telephone: 518-402-7556 Radon Test Results Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-35614020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 19.86. 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by Information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters. Worid earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TC1831758.2s Page A-26 STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2007 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC1831758.2s Page A-27 EDR Site ReportTM LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGEX NY 12590 Inquiry Number: February 5, 2007 R1 Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS The EDR-Site Report'''' is a comprehensive presentation of government flings on a facility identified in �. a search of over 4 million government records from more than 800 federal, state and local environmental databases. The report is divided into three sections: Section 1: Facility Summary ..................... ................... ............. Page 3 Summary of facility flings including a review of the following areas: waste management, waste disposal, multi -media issues, and Superfund tiability. Section 2: Facility Detail Reports .......... .................. ..................... Page 4 All available detailed information from databases where sites are identified. Section 3: Databases Searched and Update Information .. . ................:..... " ....... Page 11 Name, source, update dates, contact phone number and description of each -of the databases searched for this report. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050. with any questions or comments, Disclaimer- Copyright and Trademark Notice This report contains Information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC., SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCH WARRANTIES,. INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. HE LIABLE TO ANYONET WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND -Or THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assesment performed by an environmental professional can produce information regarding the environmental nsk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources Ino.. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or In part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affirrates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EbR and Its logos (including Sanborn and Sanbom Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Report# Prepared for/ February5, 2407 Page# 2 of20 0 SECTION 1: FACILITY SUMMARY FACILITY FACILITY ' 1 LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 AREA WAPPINGER, NY 12590 EOR ID #1000124010 EPA #NYD080466386 WASTE MANAGEMENT Facility generates hazardous waste (RCRA) YES - p4 FaclZ free s, stores, or disposes of hazardous waste On-site (RCMSDF) NO Facility has received Notices of Violations (RCRAIVIOL) NO Facility has been subject to RCRA administrative actions (RAATS) NO Facility has beers subject to corredive actions (CORRACTS) NO Facility handles PCBs (PADS) NO Facility uses radioactive materials (MLTS) NO Facility manages registered aboveground storage tanks (AST) NO Facillty manages registered underground storage tanks (UST) NO Facility has reported Ieaking'underground storage tank incidents (LUST) NO Facility has reported emergency releases to the soil (ERNS) NO FaciCdyhas reported hazardous material incidents 1- 80 (HMIRS) NO WASTE DISPOSAL Facility is a Superfund Site (NPL) NO Facility has a known or suspect abandoned, inactive or uncontrolled hazardous Waste site (CERCLIS) NO Facility has a reported Superfund Lien on It (LIENS) NO Facility Is listed as a state hazardous waste site (SHWS) Nor Facility has disposed of solid waste on-site (SWF/LF) NO MULTIMEDIA Facility uses toxic chemicals and has notified EPA NO under SARA Title III, Section 313 (TRIS) Facility produces pesticides and has notified EPA NO under Section 7 of FIFRA ($STS) Facility manufactures or imports toxic chemlcals on the TSCA list (TSCA) NO Facility has inspections under FIFRA, TSCA ' or EPCRA (FTTS) NO Facility is listed in EPA's index system (FINDS) YES - p5 Facility is listed in a county/locaf unique database (LOCAL) YES -p6 POTENTIAL S.UPERFUND LIABILITY facilliy has a list of potentially responsible parties PRP NO TOTAL (YES) 3 Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page# 3 of 20 SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS WASTE MANAGEMENT Facility generates hazardous waste " DATABASE. Resource Conservation and Recovery Information (RCRAlnfo) LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER, NY 12590 EDR ID #1000124810 Facility Name: LEE MYLES TRANSMISSIONS RTE 9 " WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 Contact: Not reported Not reported EPA -ID NYD080466386 Classification: Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time, or -generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Legal Status: Private Owner: ROBERT.TOMPKINS 'NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED, WY 21255 - 5121 (212) 555-1212' Report# Prepared for / February5, 2407 Page# 4 of 2O i SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued... MULTIMEDIA Facility is listed in EPA's index system DATABASE: Facility Index System (FINDS) LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER, NY 12590 EDR ID #1000124810 This site is listed in the Federal FINDS database. The FINDS database may contain references to records from government databases included elsewhere in the report. Please note: - the FINDS database may also contain references to out of date records formerly associated with the site. Registry ID; 110008006086 Facility Name: LEE MYLES TRANSMISSIONS Facility Address- - RTE 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 Facility County. DUTCHESS EPA Region: 02 Fed, Gov. Facility: No Indian Tribal Land: No EPA Records indicate Facility Is Listed In RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCprogram through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that genera e, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notifieation,'permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. Prg. Sys. ID: NYD080466386 Supplemental Interest: Not reported Facility SIC Codes: Not reported Facility NAICS Codes: Not reported Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page# 5 of 20 S SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued... MULTIMEDIA Facility is listed in a countyllocal unique database DATABASE: StatelCounty (LOCAL) LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER, NY 12590 EDR ID #1000124810 Database; NY MANIFEST NY MANIFEST: Document ID: NYA3287632 Manifest Status: C Transl State lD: IL009 Trans2 State ID: Not reported Generator Ship Dale: 861106 Transl Recv Date: 861106 Tran82 Reci Date: Not reported TSD Site Recv Date: 861106 Part A Recv Date: 861113 Part B Recv Date: 86111.2 Generator EPA ID: NYD080466386 Trans1 EPA ILD000805911 Trans2 EPA ID: Not reported TSDF ID: NYD000708i72 Waste Code:. D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity: 00370 Units: P - Pounds Number of Containers: 005 Container Type: DM - Metal drums, barrels Handling Method: R. Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material. Specific Gravity: 100 Year: 66 Facility Type: Generator EPA ID: NYD080466386 Facility Name: LEE MYLES Facility Address: ROUTE 9. Facility City: WAPPINGERFacility Zip 4: Not reported Country: Not reported County; DUTCHESS Mailing Name: LEE MYLES Mailing Contact: Not reported Mailing Address, ROUTE 9 Mailing City: WAPPINGER Mailing State: NY Mailing Zip, 12590 Mailing Zlp4: Not reported Mailing Country: Not reported Mailing Phone:. 914-297-5705 Document ID: NYA3107226 Manifest Status: C Transl StatelD: IL009 Trans2 State ID: Not reported Generator Ship Date: 8.61113 Transl Recv Date: 661113 Trans2 Raw Date: Not reported TSD Site Recv Date: 861113 Part A Reov Date; 661118 Part B Recv Date: 661118 Generator EPA ID: NY0080466385 Transl EPA ID: ILD000805911 Trans2 EPA ID: Not reported TSDF ID: NYD000708172 Waste Code: D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity: 00090 Units: P - Pounds Number of Containers 002 Container Type. DM - Metal drums, barrels Handling Method: R Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material. Specific Gravity: 100 Year: 86 FaciliType: Generator EPA I : NY0080466386 Facility Name: LEE MYLES Facility Address: ROUTE 9 Facility City: WAPPINGER Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page# S of 20 SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Contintied..- Facility Zip 4: Not reported - Country: Not orted County: DUTCH SS Mailing Name: LEE MYLES Mailing Contact: Not reported Mailing Address: ROUTE 9 Mailing City: WAPPINGER Mailing State: N Mailing Zip: 590 Mailing Zip4: Not reported Mailing Counlry: Not reported ' Mailing Phone: 914-297-5705 Document ID: NYA3122741 Manifest Status: C Transl State ID: IL009 Trans2,State ID: Not reported Generator Ship Date; 861022 Transl Recv Date: 861022 Trans2 Recv Dale: Not reported TSD Site Recv Date: 861022 Part A Recv Date: 861029' Part B Recv Date: 861029 Generator EPA ID: NYD080466386 Transl EPA ID: ILD000805911 Transl EPA ID: Not reported TSDF ID: Waste Code:'- NYD000708172 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES . Quantity: 00080 r Units: P:- Pounds Number of Containers: Container Type: 001 DM - Metal drums, barrels than 75 of the total material. Handling Method: RMaterial recovery of more percent Specific Gravity: 100 Year: 86 Facility Type: Generator NYI7080466386 EPA ID: Facility Name: LEE MYLES Facility Address: ROUTE9 Facility City: WAPPINGER Facility Zip 4: Not reported Country!, Not reported County: DUTCHESS Mailing Name: LEE MYLES Mailing Contact: Not reported . Mailing Address: ROUTE 9 Mailing City: GER Mailing State: NY Mailing Zip: Mailing Zip4: 12590 Not reported Mailing Country: Not reported Mailing, Phone: 914-297-5705 DocumentlD: NYA4240438 Manifest Status: Transl State ID: C 58034 -GU Trans2 State ID: Not reparied Generator Ship Date: 861231 Transl Recv Date: Transl Recv Date: 861231 Not reported TSD Site Recv Date: 861231 Part A Recv Date:. 870107 Part B Racy Date: Generator EPA ID: 870106 N pD080466386 Transl EPA ID: Transl EPA ID: Not reported TSDF ID: Waste Code: NYD000708172 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity: Units: 00080 P - Pounds Number of Containers: Container Type: 001 DM - Metal drums, barrels R00Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material. Handling Method: Specific Gravity: Year: Facility Type: 86 Generator EPA ID: NYD0.80466386 Facility Name: LEE MYLES Facility Address: ROUTE 9 Facility City: WAPPINGER 1 Facility Zip 4: Not i Country: DUTCHESS Not reported rted County: Mailing Name; LEE MYLES Mailing Contact: Not reported Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 7 of 20 N, SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued-.. Mailing Address: ROUTE 9 Mailing City.: WAPPINGER Mailing State; NY Mailing Zip: 12590 Mailing Zip4: Not reported Mailing Country: Not reported Mailing Phone: 914-297-5705 Document ID: NYA3869853 Manifest Status; C Transl State ID; IL009 Trans2 State ID; Not reported Generator Ship Date; 861212 Transl Recv Date: 861212. Trans2 Recv Date; Not reported TSD Site.Recv Date: 861212 Part A Recv Date: 861217 Part 6 Recv Date: 861217 Generator EPA ID: NY0080466386 Transl EPA ID: ILD000805911 Trans2 EPA ID: Not reported TSDF ID: NY0000708172 Waste Code: D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity: 00305 Units; P - Pounds Number of Containers: 005 Container Type: DM - Metal drums, barrels -Handling. Method: R Material recovery of, more than 75 percent of the total material.. Specific Gravity: 100 Year: 86 Facility Type: Generator EPA ID: NYD080466386 Facility Name: LEE MYLES Facility Address: ROUTE 9 Facility City: WAPPINGER Facility Zip 4: Not reported ' Couhtry: Not reported County: DUTCHESS Mailing Name: LEE MYLES Mailing Contact- Not reported Mailing Address: ROUTE 9 Mailing- City. WAPPINGER Mai ing State: NY Maliing Zip: 12590 Mailing Zip4: Not reported Mailing Country: Not reported Mailing Phone: 914-297-5705 Document iD: NYA3884466 Manifest Status: C Transl State it): IL009 Transl State ID: Not reported Generator Ship Date: 861219 Transl Recv Date: 861219 Transl Recv-Date: Not reported TSD Site Recv Date: 861219 Part A Recv Da6e: 861226 Part B Recv Date: 861226 Generator EPA ID: NYD080466386 Transl EPA ID: ILOD00805911 Transl EPA ID: Not reported TSDF ID; NYD000708172 Waste Code: D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity: 00090 Units: P - Pounds Number of Containers:. 002 Container Type-, DM - Metal drums, barrels Handling Method: R Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material. Specific Gravity, 100 Year: 86 Facility Type: Generator EPA ID: NYD080466386 Facility Name: LEE MYLES Facility Address; ROUTE 9 Facility City: WAPPINGER Facility Zip 4; Not reported Country: Not reported County: DUTCHESS Mailing Name: LEE MYLES Mailing Contact-: Not reported Mailing Address: ROUTE 9 Mailing City: WAPPINGER Mailing State: NY Mailing Zip;' 12590 Ma€ling Zip4: Not reported Report# Prepared for l February5, 2007 Page# 8 of 20 „_. Mailing Country; Mailing Phone: Document ID: Manifest Status: Transl State ID: Trans2 State ID: Generator Ship Date: Transl Recd Date: Trans2 Recv Date: TSD Site Recv Date: Part A Recv Date: Part B Recv Date: Generator EPA ID: Transl EPA 1D: Trans2 EPA ID: TSDF ID: Waste Code: Quantity: Units: Number of Containers: Container Type: Handling ,Method; Specific Gravity: Year: Facility Type: EPA ID. Facility.Name: Facility Hdifress:.. Facility City: Facility Zip 4: Country: County: Mailing Name: Mailing Contact: Mailing Address: Mailing City: Mailing State: Mailing Zip: Mailing Zip4: Mailing Country: Mailing Phone: Document ID; Manifest Status: Trans: State ID:` Trans2 State ID: Generator Ship Date: Transi Recv Date: Trans2 Recv Date: TSD Site Recv Date: Part A Recv Date: Part B Recv Date: Generator EPA ID: Transl EPA ID: Trans2 EPA ID: TSDF.ID: Waste Code: Quantity: Units: Number of Containers: Container Type: Handling Method: Specific Gravity: Year Facility Type: EPA ID: Facility Name: Facility Address: Facility City: Facility Zip 4: Country: County: Mailing Name: MaNrig Contact: Mailing Address: Mai ing City: Mailing State: Mailing Zip: Mai ling'Zip4: Malting Country: Mailing Phone: Document 10: Manifest Status: SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued... Not reported 974-297-5705 NYA1247922 C 58034 -GU Not reported 870108 870108 Not reported 870108 870114 870113 NYD080466386 ILD000806911 Not reported NYD000708172 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES 00250 P - Pounds 004 DM - Metal drums, barrels R Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material., 100 87 Genetator NYD080466386 LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER Not reported Not reported DUTCHESS LEE MYLES. Not reported ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER NY 12590 Not reported Not reported 914-297-5705 NYA6467263 C 58034GU Not reported 870219 870219 Not reported 870219 870303 870303 NYDOB0466386 It -D000805911 Not reported NYDOW708172 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES. 00080 P - Pounds 001 DM - Metal drums, barrels R Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material. 100 87 Generator NYD080466386 LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER Not reported Not reported DUTCHESS LEE MYLES Not ha acted ROUTE 9. WAPPINGER NY 12590 Not reported Not reported 914-2975705 NYA6480297 C Report# Prepared for/ February5, 2007 Page# 9 of 20 Transi State ID: Trans2 State ID: Generator Ship Date: Transl Recv Date: Trans2 Recv Data: TSD Site Recv Date: Part A Reev pate: Part B Recv Date: Generator EPA ID: Transi EPA ID: Trans2 EPA ID: TSDF ID; Waste Code: Quantity: Units: Number of Containers: Container Type: Handling Method: Specifto Gravity; Year. Facility Type: EPA ID: Facility Name: Facility Address: Facility City: Facility Zip 4: Country, County: Malling,Narne Mailing Contact; Mailing Address: Mailing City: Mailing State: Mailing Zip: Mailing Zip4: Mailing Country. Mailing Phone: Document ID: Manifest Status: Transl State ID: Trans2'State ID: Generator Ship Date: Transl Recv Date: Trans2 Recv Date: TSD•Stte Recv Date: Part A Recv Date: Part B Recv Date: Generator EPA ID: Transi EPA ID: Trans2 EPA ID: TSDF ID: Waste Code: Quantity. Units: Number of Containers:. Container Type: Handling Method: Specific Gravity: Year: Facility Type: EPA ID: Facility Name: Facility Address: Facility City, Facility Zip 4: Country: " County: Mailing ,Name - Mailing Contact Mailing Address - Mailing City,- Mailing ity;Mailing State: Mailing Zip; Mailing Zip4: Mailing Country: Mailing Phone: SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued... Not reported Not reported 870126- 870126 Not reported 870126 870204 870204 NYD080466386 ILD000805911 Not reported NYD000708172 D001 - NOWUSTED IGNITABLE WASTES 00080 P - Pounds 001 DM - Metal drums, barrels R Material recovery of more than 75 percent of the total material_ 100 87 Generator NYDOB0466386 LEE MYLES ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER Not reported Not reported DUTCI-iESS LEE MYLES Not reported ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER NY 12590 Not reported Not reported 914297-5705 NYA6469245 C Not reported Not reported 870205 . 870205 Not reported 870205 870212 870212 . NY00804663oe ILD000805911 Not reported NYD000708172 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES 00340 P - Pounds 006 DM - Metal drums, barrels R Material recovery of more than 100 87 Generator NYD080466386 LEE MYLES. ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER Not reported Not reported DUTCHESS LEE MYLES Not reported ROUTE 9 WAPPINGER . NY 12590 Not reported , Not reported 914-29T-5705 75 percent of the total.material. Report# Prepared for/ February5, 2007 Page# 10 of2d SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES To maintain currency of the foliowing federal, state and local databases, EDR contacts the appropriate government agency on a monthly or quarterly basis as required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this report meets or exceeds the 90 -day updating requirement of the ASTM standard. WASTE MANAGEMENT RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act information Source; EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRAInfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). The database includes selective informationon sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste.as , defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate. over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hatardous waste per month, Transporters are individuals or entlties that move hazardous waste from the generator off-site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of GovemmentVersion; 06/13/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01110!2007 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled ,Update: 02/19/2007 SRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste -DRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version; 12/31/2003 Database Release Frequency_ Biennially E Date of Last EDR Contact: 01119/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03112/2007 RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made It Impossible to continue to update the information contained In the database. Date of Government Version: 04117/1995 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/0412006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03!0512007 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800424-9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 09%27/2006 Database Release Frequency., Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2006 - Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/05/2007 PADS: PCB Activity Database System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Govemment Version: 10/1712006 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 11129/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02105/2007 Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 11 of 20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES .,.Continued... MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone` 301-415-7169 MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possessor use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Govemment Version: 10119/2006 Database Release Ftequency: Quartedy NY AST: Petroleum Bulk Storage Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 09114/2006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/0212007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/0212007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01!2412007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04!2312007 NY UST: Petroleum Bulk Storage {PBS) Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 6.18-402-9549 Facilities that have petroleum storage capacities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,000 gallons. Date of Government Version: 0@1.412006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 0,1124120.07 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date bf Next Scheduled Update -.'0412312007 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone. 202-260-2342 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/3112005 Database Release Frequency: Annually .Date of Last EDR Contact; 0,112412007 Date of.Next Scheduled Update..0412312007 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Annually WASTE DISPOSAL Date of Last EDR Contact. 0111712007. Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0411612007 NPL: National Priority List Source; EPA Telephone: Not reported National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of GERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas, As such, EDR provides Polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 69127/2006 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/2212006 Database Release Frequency: 'Quarterly Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Source: EPA Telephone: Not reported Date of Government Version: 09127/2006 Date Made Active at EDR,- 11/22/2006 Database Refease Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/01/2006 Elapsed ASTM Days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/3112007 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/0112006 Elapsed ASTM Days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11101/2006 Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 12 of 20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: Not reported The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Pian (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.426.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2006 Date Made Active at EDR: 11=2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/0112006 Elapsed ASTM Days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2007 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 703-603-8960 CERCLIS Contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,.and Liability Act CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are e€Qher proposed to or on the National Priorities List NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Govemment Version: 11/2812006 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 1211912006' Date Made Active at EDR; 01/29/2007 Elapsed ASTM Days: 41 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/1912006 CERCLJS-NFRAP:.CERCLtS, No Further Remedial Action,Planned Source` EPA Telephone: 703-603-8960 Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL)-, unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate of other considerations require a recommendation for listing ata later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a' given site; it only means that, based upon available Information, the location is not judged to be a potentia[ NPL site. Date of Govemment Version: 10/10/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12116/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/19/2007 ROD: Records Of Decision Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Record of Decision. Rob documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 10/0712006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04102122007 NPL RECOVERY: Federal Superfund Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Federal Suppeerfuhd Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens ajainst real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability_ USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10115/1991 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/3011994 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/02/1994 Elapsed ASTM Days: tib . Date of Last EDR Contact: 11117/2006 NY SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York State Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9622 Referred to as the State Superfund Program the Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Remedial Program is the cleanup program for inactive hazardous waste sites and now includes hazardous substance sites Date of Government Version: 12/01/2006 Date of.Last EDR Contact: 12114/2006 Database Release Frequency_ Annually Date of Next'SCheduled Update: 0311212007 Report# Prepared for/ February5, 2007 Page# f8 of20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued.-. NY SWFILF: Facility Register Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-457-2051 Solid Waste FacilifieslLandfill Sites. SWFILF type reoords typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills In a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be actrve or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D' Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 10/3112006 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually MULTIMEDIA Date of Last EOR Contact: 01/29/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0413012007 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-6250 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, "ter and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Govemment Version: 1213112004 Database Release Frequency, Annually. Date of Last EDR Contact: 1 211 912 0 06 Data of Next Scheduled Update: 03/19/2007 SSTS. Section 7 Tracking Systems Source: EPA Telephone -, on 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide odenticlde Act, as amended {92 Stat. • 829 requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the.past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2004 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0 411 612 0 0 7 TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5621 Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume ofthese substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002 Database Release Frequency: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update, 04116!2007 FITS: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide,;Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA10ffice of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contactstheAgency on a quarterly basis. Date ofGovernment Version: 10/1912006 Database. Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2006 Date of Neil Scheduled Update -:03111912007 FITS INSP. FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date of Govemment Version: 10/19/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/1812006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03119/2007 Report# Prepared for/ Pebruary5, 2007 Page# f4 of20 SECTION 3: •DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Source: EPA Telephone: Not reported Facility index System. FINDS contains both facility information and'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases In this report PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System); STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PC8 Activity Data System). Date of Govemment Version: 1 011 112 006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01102/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/02/2007 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-5648600 When. Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1980, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances_ The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last Five years, and an evaluation of "'""wbi•'st=cas'a',and altemaiiVe accidental releases; Prevenfrort program titiak.tncttades safety precautions ..• •- •- anal maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 09101/2006 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 1 111 7120 0 6 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/19/2007 STORMWATER: Storm Water General Permits Source:. Environmental Protection Agency Telephone . 202-564-0746 A listing of all facilities with Storm Water General Permits. Date of Govemment Version: 0610212005 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01!0212007 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04102/'2007 US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8905 A listing of sites with engineering controls in place, Engineering controls include various' 'forms. of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media oreffect human health. Date of Government Version: 10116!2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 0110212007 Database Release Frequency. Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04102/2007 US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8905 A listing'61 sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administratlye measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, constriction restrictions, property use restrictions, and postremediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site, Dead restrictions are generally required as part of the Institutional controls_ Date of Government Version: 1011812006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/0212007 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0410212007 INDIAN. LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-916-1313 A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Govemment Version: 1 210 4 12 00 5 Date of Last EDR Contact' 1111712006 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/19/2007 Report# Prepared for! February5, 2007 Page# f 5 of 20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued..., RADINFQ: Radiation Information Database Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 The Radiation Information Database (RAI)INFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U_S..Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2006 . Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 0113112007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/3012007 LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005 Database Release Frequency: VaP1es Date of Last EDR Contact: 12111/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0311.212007 CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 . A listing of clandestine drug lab locations: The U.S, Department of Justice ("the Department') provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they<found chemicals or otber items that,Jl digated the •<. presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites, In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 12-10112006 Database 210112008Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01!0812007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03126/2007 NY HSWDS: Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site Inventory' Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9564 The list includes any known or suspected hazardous substance waste disposal sites. Also included are sites delisted from the Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites and non -Registry sites that U.S. EPA Preliminary Assessment (PA) reports or Site Investigation((SI) reporfs were prepared" Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Sites are effg€. to be $uporfund sites now that the New York State Superfund has been refinanced and changed. This means•that the study inventory has served its purpose and will no longer be maintained as a separate entity. The last version of the study €nventory is frozen in time. The sites on the study will not automatically be made Superfund sites, rather each site will be further evaluated for listing . on the Registry. So overtime they will be added to the registry or not. Date of Goverment Version: 01/0112003 Date of Last EDR Contact: 1112712006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/26/2007 NY DEL SHWS: Delisted Registry Sites Source: Department of Environmental Conservation. Telephone: 51 B-402-9622 A database listing of sites delisted from the Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2006 Database'Release Frequency: Annually NY SWRCY: Registered Recycling Facility List Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone; 518-402-8705 A listing of recycling facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2006 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/12/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0413012007 Report# Prepared for/ February5, 2007 Page# 16 o(20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES _Continued... . 9 NY SWTIRE: Registered Waste Tire Storage & f=acility List Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Teiephone: 518-402-8694 Date of Last EDR,Contact: 11115/2006 Date of Government Version: OB10112006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/1212007 Database Release Frequency: Annually NY LTANKS: Spills Information Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 618-402-9549 Leaking Storage Tank Incident Reports, These records contain an Inventory of reported leaking storage tank incidents reported from 4/1186 through the most recent update. They can be either leaking underground storage tanks or leaking aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the Incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills. Date of Last EDR Contact:. 01/24/2007 Database Release Frequency' Varies Varies 00fi Date of Government Version: 0Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0412312007 arie NY HEST LTANKS: Listing of Leaking Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 A listing, of leaking underground and aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills. In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservation stopped providing updates to Its original Spills information Database. This database fnEludes fields that are no longer avaiiabletrom the NYDEC.as of January 1, 2002. Current information may fared in the LTANKS database. Department of Environmental Conservation_ Date of Government Version: 01/01 /2002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/0712006re Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next 5cheduled.Update: Not reported NY CBS UST: Chemical .Bulk Storage Database Source: NYSDEC Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that store regulated hazardous substances in underground tanks of any size Date of Last EDR Contact: 10124/2005 Date of Government Version: 01!0112002 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0 112 312 0 0 6 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY MOSF UST: Major Oil Storage Facilities Database ; Source: NYSDEC Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that may be onshore facilities or vessels, with petroleum storage. capacities of 460,000 gallons or greater. ©ate of Government Version: 01601/2002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/2612005 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 10124/2005 Database Release Frequency: Varies NY HIST UST: Historical Petroleum Sulk Storage Database Source: Department. of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that have petroleum storage capacities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,6DO gallons. Date of Last EOR Contact: 1012312006 Date of Govemmenf Version: 0110112002 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 01/22/2007 Database Release Frequency: Varies NY CBS AST: Chemical Bulk Storage Database Source: NYSDEC Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that. store regulated hazardous substances in aboveground tanks with capacities of 185 gallons or greater, and/or In underground tanks of any size. Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/2512005 Date of Govemment Version: 01/01/2002 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 10/2412005 Database Release Frequency' No Update Planned Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 17 of20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... NY HIST AST: Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Govemment Version. 01101/2002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0112212007, NY MOSF AST: Major Oil Storage Facilities Database Source; NYSDEC Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that may be onshore facilities or vessels, with petroleum storage capacities of 400,000 gallons or greater. Date of Govemment Version: 01/0112002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2005 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update:10124/2Q05 NY NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402 8651 Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a'TSD facility, Date of Government Version: 1 012 612 00 6 Date'of Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2006 Database Release•Fregtteney,. -Annually Date ofNext Scheduled-Upd"ata:..0212612007 NY SPILLS: Spills Information Database Source; Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 510402-9549 Data collected on spills reported to NYSDEC as required by one or more of the following; Article 12 of the Navigation Law, 6 NYCRR Section 613.8 (from PBS regs), or 6 NYCRR Section 5952 (from CBS.regs)_ It includes spills active as of April 1, 1986, as Well as spins occurring since this date. Date of Government Version: 09/1412006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01124/2007 Database Release Frequency. Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04123/2007 NY HIST SPILLS: SPILLS Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 This database contains records of chemical and petroleum spill incidents. Under State law, Eand hazardous chemical spills that can Impact the waters of the state must be reported by the spiller (and, in some cases, by anyone who has knowledge of the spills). In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservation stopped providing updates to Its original Spills Information Database. This database includes fields that are no longer available from the NYDEC as of January 1, 2002. Current'information may be found in the NY SPILLS database, Department of Environmental Conservation. Date of Govemment Version: 01/01/2002 Database Release Frequency: No Update, Planned NY ENG CONTROLS: Registry of Engineering rControls Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone; 518-402-9553 Environmental Remediation sites that have engineering controls in place. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly NY INST CONTROL: Registry of Institutional Controls Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9553 Environmental Remediation sites that have institutional controls in place. Date of Government Version: 12101/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 07!0712005 Date of Next Scheduled Update: Not reported Date of Last EDR Contact: 12114/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/12/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/1212007 Deport# Prepared for/ February5, 2007 Page# f8 of20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... NY VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Agreements Source: Department of lEnvironmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9711 New York established its Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) to address the environmental, legal and financial barriers .that often hinder the redevelopment and reuse of contaminated properties. The Voluntary Cleanup Program was developed to enhance private sector cleanup of brownfields by enabling parties to remediate sites using private rather than public funds and to reduce the development pressures on "greenfield" sites. Date of Govemmenl Version: 12!0112006 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually NY DRYCLEANERS. Registered Drycleaners Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8403 A listing of all registered drycleaning facilities. Date of GovemmentVersion: 06/15/2004 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 12114/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/12/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/2112004 Data of Next Scheduled Update: Not reported NY BROWNFIELDS: Brownf'ields Site List Source; Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone:. 518-402-9764 A Brownfield is any real property where redevelopment or re -use may be complicated by the *6i 6nd6'"6r.'.potential presence of•a hazardous waste,. petroleum,:polli tapt, or.corntaminant:. Date of Government Version: 12/0112006 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/1412006 Date of Next Scheduled Update -43112/2007 NY SPDES: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8233 New York State has a state program which has been approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the control of wastewater and stormwater discharges in accordance with the Clean Water Act Under New York State law the program is known as the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) and is broader in scope than that required by the Clean Water Act in (hat it controls point source discharges to groundwaters as well as surface waters. Date of Government Version: 11/08/2006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY AIRS: Air Emissions Data Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8452 Date of Govemment Version: 12/3112002 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02105/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 05107/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11120/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update; 02/19/2007 NY E DESIGNATION: E DESIGNATION.SITE LISTING Source: New York City Department of City Planning Telephone: 718-595-6658 The (E (Environmental)) designation would ensure that sampling and remediation take place on the subject properties, and would avoid any significant impacts related to hazardous materials at these locations. The (E) designations• would require that the fee owner of the sites conduct a testing and sampling protocol, and remediation where appropriate, to the satisfaction of the NYCDEP before the issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-15 of the Zoning Resolution (Environmental Requirements). The (E) designations also include a mandatory construction -related health and safety plan which must be approved by NYCDEP. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Vades Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2007 _ Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0411612007 Reporf# Prepared fort February 5, 2007 Page# 19 of20 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... POTENTIAL SUPERFUND LIABILITY PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6064 A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/07/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/02/2007 _ I t Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page` 20 of 20 EDR Site ReportTM AMERADA HESS . . 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 Inquiry -Number: February 5, 2007 R® Environmental. Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS The EDR-Site Reporfm is a comprehensive presentation of government filings on a facility identified in a search of over 4 million government records from more than 600 federal, state and local environmental databases. The report is divided into three sections: Section 1: Facility Summary . —............................. .................... ... Page 3 Summary of facility filings including a review of the following areas: waste management, waste disposal, multi -media issues, and Superfund liability. Section 2: Facility Detail Reports ............. ':...'.................................... Page 4 All available detailed information from databases where sites are identified. Section 3: Databases Searched and Update Information .......................... . ...... Page 8 Name, source, update dates, contact phone number and description of each of the databases searched for this report. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources , Inc. It cannot be Concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC, SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCN WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, . CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGESANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND of THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purcilaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assesment performed by an environmental professlonai can produce information regarding the environmental risk for any property, Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2007 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or In part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc, or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners - Report# Prepared for l February 5, 2007 Page# 2 of f 7 SECTION 1: FACILITY'SUMMARY FACILITY FACILITY 1 AMERADA HESS 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 AREA EDR ID 01 OD7112319 EPA #NYD987040862 WASTE MANAGEMENT Facility generates hazardous waste (RCRA) YES - p4 Facility treats, stores, or disposes of hazardous waste on-site (RCRA7TSOF) NO FaciNty has received Notices of Violations (RCRANIOL) NO Facility has been subject to RCRA administrative. actions (RAATS) NO Facility has been subjectio corrective actions (CORRACTS) NO Facility handles PCBs (PADS) NO Facility uses radioactive materials (MLTS) NO Facility manages registered aboveground storage tanks (AST) NO Facility manages registered undergroundt storage tanks (UST) NO Facility has reported leaking underground storage tank Ihddents•(LUST) NO Facility has reported emergency releases to the soil (ERNS) NO Faciletty has reported hazardous material hoidents to DOT (HMIRS) NO WASTE DISPOSAL Facility is a Superfund Site (NPL) NO Facility has a known or suspect abandoned, inactive or uncontrolled hazardous waste site (CERCLIS) NO Facility has a reported Superfund Llen on it (LIENS) NO Facility Is listed as a state hazardous waste site (SHWS) NO Facility.has disposed of solid waste on=site (SWF/LF) NO MULTIMEDIA Facility uses loxdc chemicals and has notified EPA NO under SARA Title Ili, Section 313 (TRIS) Facility produces pesticides and has notified EPA under Section 7 of FIFRA (SSTS) NO Facility manufactures or Imports toxic chemicals on the TSCA list (TSCA) NO FacII%has Inspections under FiFRA. TSCA or EP_ RA (FTTS) NO Facility is listed in EPA's Index system (FINDS) NO Facility is listed in a countyAocal unique database (LOCAL) YES - p5 POTENTIAL SUPERFUND LIABILITY Facility has a list of potentially responsible parties PRP NO TOTAL (YES) 2 . Report# Prepared for/ February5, 2007 Page# 3 of 17 SECTION 2:. FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS WASTE MANAGEMENT Facility generates hazardous waste DATABASE: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information (RCRAlnfo) AMERADA HESS 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 EDR ID #1007112319 Facility Name' AMERADA HESS STATION 32332 1237 RTE 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 Mailing Address: HESS'PLZ WB-MHR WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 Contact: TOM WHITTAKER . HESS PLZ WB-MHR WOODBRIDGE,.NJ 07095 (732) 750-5225 EPA -ID: NYD987040862 Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler. generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely, hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any lime: -'1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or -100 kq or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, Into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: - 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or - 100 kg or less of any residueor contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of. a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste Legal Status: Private Owner: AMERADA HESS CORP 1 HESS PLZ W0ODBRlDGE, NJ 73275 - 0600 (732) 750-6000 Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 4 of 17 N SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued... ( MULTIMEDIA Facility is listed in a countyllocal unique database DATABASE: State/County (LOCAL) AMERADA HESS 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590 ED ID #1007112319 Database: NY MANIFEST NY MANIFEST: Document ID: NJA1702113 Manifest Status: Transl State ID: C NJDEPS068 Trans2 State iD: Not reported Generator Ship Date: 931007 Transi Recv Date: 931007 Trans2 Recv Date: Not reported TSD Site Reov Date: 931008 Part A Recy.Date:, 931109 Part B Recv Date: 931026 Generator EPA ID: NYD987040862 Transl EPA ID: 179 Trans2 EPA ID: Not reported146 TSDF ID: Waste Code: NJD002200046 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity. Units: 04050 P - Pounds Number of Containers: Container Type: 001 DM_ Metal drums, barrels Handling Method: B Incineration, heat recovery, burning. Specific Gravity: 1100 Year: 93 Facility Type: Generator EPA ID: NYD967040862 ' Facility Name: AMERADA HESS Facility Address. Facility City: 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS Facility Zip 4-- Not reported Country: Not reported County: DUTCHESS Mailing Name: Mailing Contact: AMERADA HESS CATHY SUE FISHER Mailing Address: 1 HESS PLAZA WB -6 Mailing City, WOODBRIDGE Mailing State: NJ Mailing Zip: Mailing Zip4' 07095 Not reported Mailing Country: Not reported Mailing Phone: 906-750-6000 Document ID: NJA5005140 Manifest Status: Notreported Transl State ID: Trans2 State ID: Not reported Generator Ship.Date: 08/12/2004 Transl Recv Date: 0811212004 Trans2 Recv Date: Notreported TSD Site Recv Date: D8112f2004 Part A Recv Date: Not reported Part B Reov Date: Not reported Generator EPA ID: NYD987040862 Transl EPA ID: NJO000027193 Trans2 EPA ID: Not reported, TSDF ID: Waste Code: NJD002200 D001 - NON -LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES Quantity: Units: 00095 G - Gallons (liquids only)' (8.3 pounds) Number of Containers: Container Type: 003 DM -Metal drums, barrels Handling Method: B Incineration, heat recovery, burning_ Specific Gravity: 01.00 Year. Facility Type: 04 Generator EPA ID: Facility Name: AMERADA HESS Facility -Address: Facility City: 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 5 of 17 Facility Zip 4: Country: County: Mailing Name: Mailing Contact: Mailing Address: Mailing City: Mailing State: Mailing Zlp: Mailing Zip4: Mailing Country: Mailing Phone: Document ID: Manifest Status: Transl'StateID: Trans2 State ID: Generator Shipp Date: Transl Recv Gate; Transl Recv Rate; TSD Site Recv Date: Part A Recv, Date: Part B Recv-Date: Generator EPA ID; Transl EPA ID: Transl EPA ID: TSDF ID' Waste -Cade: Quantity: Units: Number of Containers: Container Type: Handling Method: Specific Gravity: Year. Facility Type: EPA ID: Facility Name: Facility Address: Facility City: Facility Zip 4: Cou ntry: County: Mailing Name: Mailing Contact; Mailing Address.- Mailing ddress:Mailing City: Mailing State: Mailing Zip: Mailing Zip4: Mailing Country: Mailing Phone: SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS. .-Continued— Not reported Not reported DUTCHESS AMERADA HESS CATHY SUE FISHER 1 HESS PLAZA WB -6 WOODBRIDGE NJ . 07095 Not reported Not reported 908-750-6000 NJA5268957 Not reported NJ0000027193 Not reported 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 Not reported 05120/2005 Not reported Not reported NYD987040862 55811 Not reported NJ0002200046 D018 -BENZENE 0.5 MG/L ..TCLP 01500 P - Pounds 003 DM - Metal drums, barrels B Incineration, heat recovery; burning. 01.00 Not reported Generator NYD987040862 AMERADA HESS 1237 RT 9 WAPPINGERS FALLS Not reported Not reported DUTCHESS AMERADA HESS CATHY SUE FISHER 1 HESS PLAZA W6=6 WOODBRIDGE NJ 07095 Not reported Not reported 908-750-6000 NJ MANIFEST: NJASOG5140 Manifest Code: NJA5258957 EPA. I D. NYD987040862 Date Shipped: 20050520 TSDF EPA ID: NJD002200046 Transporter EPA ID: NJO000027193 Transporter 2 EPA ID: Not reported Date Transl Transported Waste: 050520 Date Trans2 Transported Waste: 000000 Date TSDF Received Waste: 050520 Tranporter l Decal: Not reported Tranporter 2 Decal:. Not reported Data Entry Number: 06220521. Reference Manifest Number: Not reported Was Load Rejected (YIN): No Reason Load Was Rejected: Not reported Waste Code: Not reported Quantity: Not reported Unit Not reported Hand Code: Not reported Manifest Code: NJASOG5140 EPA ID: WD987040862 Date Shipped: 20040812 TSDF EPA ID: NJD0022ODD46 Transporter EPA ID: NJO000027193 Transporter 2 EPA I D: Not reported Date Transl Transported Waste: 040812 Report# . Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 6 of 17 SECTION 2: FACILITY DETAIL REPORTS ...Continued... Date Trans2 Transported Waste: 000000 Date TSDF Received Waste: 040812 Tranporter 1 Decal: Not reported Tranporter2 Decal: Not reported Data Entry Number: D9130425 Reference Manifest Number. Not reported Was Load Rejected (Y/N): No Reason Load Was Rejected: Not reported Waste Code: Not reported Quantity: Not repotted Unit: Not reported Hand Code: Not reported 1 l Report# Prepared for/ FebruaryS, 2007 Page# 7of 97 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES To maintain currency of the following federal, state and focal databases, EDR contacts the appropriate government agency on a monthly or quarterly basis as required_ Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this report meets or exceeds the -90 -day updating requirement of the ASTM standard. WASTE MANAGEMENT RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-$34f) RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of. 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRAInfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazarrddous waste per month- Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off-site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date otGovernment" Version: 06113/2006 Date of Last'EDR Contact: 01!1'012007 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/1 9f2007 BRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPAINTIS Telephone: 600-424-9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA thatcoiiects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large. Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/3112003 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/12/2007 RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-56¢4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System: RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03105/2007 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA' Telephone: 800-424.9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12104/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0310612007 PADS: PCB Activity Database System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 PCB. Activity Database, PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and. disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. . Date of Government Version: 10/17/2006 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 1112912005 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/05/2007 Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 .Page# 8 of 17 N SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuciear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EOR contacts the Agency ort a quarterly basis. Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02t2007 Date of Next Scheduled update; 04/02/2007 Date of Govemment Version: 10/19/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly NY AST' Petroleum Bulk Storage Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 09114/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/23/2007 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY UST: Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS) Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that have petroleum storage capacities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,000 gailons. of G � _: c 0No Update Frequency: No Update Planned Frequency: Date :of Last EDR. Contact. ate: 02007 . Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04123/2007 Date Release patabase Release ERNS:' Emergency Response Notification System Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-260-2342 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases ofoil and hazardous substances.. Date of GoWemmenl Version: 1218112005 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/23/2007 Database Retease Frequency: Annually HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source_ U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Govemment Version: 08/0112006 Date of Last EDR contact: 01117/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04116!2007 Database Release Frequency: Annually 1 4 WASTE DISPOSAL NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Telephone:Not reported National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program -'NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Govemment Version: 09127/2006 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/0112006 Dake Made Active at EDR: 11122/2006 . Elapsed ASTM Days: 21 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 0113112007 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Source. EPA Telephone: Not reported Date of Govemment Version: 09/27/2006 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/0112006 Date Made Active at EDR: 11 /22/2006 Elapsed ASTM Days: 21 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 11101!2006 Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page# 9 of 17 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...continued... DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: Not reported The National Oil and Hazardous Substances. Pollution Confingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), . sites maybe deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2006 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/2212006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/01/2006 Elapsed ASTM Days: 21 irate of Last EDR Contact: 01/3112007 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 703-603-8960 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible Inclusion on the NPL. Date of Govemment Verslon: 11/28/2006 Date Made Active at EDR: 0112912007 . Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/19/2006 Elapsed ASTM Days: 41 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2006 CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial !Action Planned . Source: EPA Telephone: 703-603-8960 Archlved sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the.best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list'this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information Indicates this decision Was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a po.teniial NPL site. Date bf Government Version: 10/10/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/1812006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/19/2007 ROD: Records, Of Decision Souroe: EPA Telephone: 703-416=0223 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site ' containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 10/0712006 Database Release Frequency. An' nually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2007 Date of Next ScheduledUpdate: 04102/2007 NPL RECOVERY: Federal Superfund" Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by. CERCLA of. 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/16/1991 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02102!1994 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/30/1994 Elapsed ASTM Days: 56 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2006 NYSHWS: Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York State Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 516-402-9622 Referred to as the State Superfund Program, the Inactive Hazardous Waste -Disposal Site Remedial Program is the cleanup program for Inactive hazardous waste sites and now includes hazardous substance sites Date of Government Version: 1210:/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2006 Database Release Frequency_ Annually Date of Next Scheduled Update: 0311 212 0 07 Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page# iD of 17 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... NY SWFILF: Facility Register Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-457-2051 Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites_ SWFILF type records typically contain an inventory, of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version:'10/31/2006 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually MULTIMEDIA Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/2912007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/30/2007 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 2D2-566 0250 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government' Version: 12/31/2004 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of last EDR Contact: 1211912006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/1912007 SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Source; EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203: Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Govemment Version: 12131/2004 Database Release Frequency: Annually bate of Last EDR Contact: 0112912D07 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/1612007 TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone:202-260-5521 " Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list.It includes data on the production . volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Versions 12131/2002 Database Release Frequency: NIA Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04116!2007 FTTS`•FiFRA/TSCA Tracking'System -FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)ITSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Khow Act), To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 10/1912006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 12/18/2006 bate of Next Scheduled Update: 0 311 912 0 07 FITS INSP: RFRAITSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date of Govemment Version: 10119!2006 Database Release Frequency_ Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/19=07 Report# Prepared for / February 5, 2007 Page# 11 of 17 1*1 SECTION 3: DATABASES, SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES " ...Continued.._, FINDS: Facility Index SystemlFacility Registry System Source: EPA Telephone: Not reported Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information, to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS'(Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).. . Date of Govemment Version: 1 011 1 1200 6 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04102/2007 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone- 202-564-6600 When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The (tisk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells. out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occuf." Date of Govemment Version: 09/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Varies STORMWATER: Storm Water General Permits Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0746 A listing of all facilities with Storm Water General Permits. Date of Govemment Version: 06/02/2005 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/1712006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/19/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update; 04102/2007 US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List Source: Environmental Protectign Agency Telephone; 703-603-8905 A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 10/18/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Database, Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04102/2007 US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-6906 A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, . and post remediation, rare requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Govemment Version: 11011812006 Database Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST Rl: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source. EPA Region'l Telephone; 617-9111-1313 A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 12101/2006 Database Release Frequency: Vanes Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/0212007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11.11712006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/1912007 Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 12 of 17 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... RADINFO: Radiation Information Database Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 at The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains i formaBfor radut latonhand' are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyA (EPA)regulations rad ioactivitY. Date of Govern merit Version: 11102006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2007 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next ScheduledUpdate: 04/3012007 LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 1210912005 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12111/2006 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/1212007 CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-•307-1000 A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department') provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enff6i eiinent agencies'reported they found'ehemicals or.other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites, In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does the accuracy by, for example contacting accuracy.ntee its local Members enforcement nt and local ublic Must health departments. ll entries Date of Last EOR Contact: 01/08/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/25/2007 Date of Government Version: 12/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly NY HSWDS: Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Site inventory .Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9564 The list includes any known or suspected hazardous substance waste disposal sites. Also included aresites delisted from the Registry of Inactive Hazardous.Waste Disposal Sites and non -Registry sites that U.S. EPA Preliminary Assessment (PA) reports or Site Investigation (SI) reports were prepared_ Hazardous Substance Waste Disposal Sites are eligible to be uperfund sites now that the New York State Superfund has been refinanced and changed- This means that the study 'inventory has served its purpose and will no longer be maintained as a separate entity. The last version -of the study inventory is frozen in time. The sites on the study will riot - automaticalty be made Superfund sites, rather each site will be further evaluated for listing on the Registry. -So overtime they Wit be added to the registry or not Date of Last EDR Contact: 11.12712006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/26/2007 Date of Government Version: 01 10 11200 3 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY DEL SHWS: Delisted Registry Sites Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9622 A database listing of sites delisted from the Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites_ Date of Govemment Version: 08104/2006 Database Release Frequency: Annually NY SWRCY: Registered Recycling Facility List Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8705 . A listing of recycling facilities - Date of Government Version: 10131/2006 Database Release Frequency: Semi Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12114!2006 Date 'of Next Scheduied Update: 03112/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/30/2007 Report# Prepared for / February5, 2007 Page# 13 of 17 SECTION. 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... NY SWTiRE: Registered Waste Tire Storage & Facility List Source: Department of Envkonmental Conservation Telephone; 51802-8694 Date of Government Version: 08/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/12/2007 NY LTANKS: Spills Information Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Leaking Storage Tank Incident Reports. These records contain an inventory'of reported leaking storage tank incidents reported from 411186 througti the most recent update. They can be either leaking underground storage tanks or leaking aboveground storage tanks. The causes of the incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills. Date of Government Version: 09114/2006 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update; D4/2312007 NY HIST LTANKS: Listing of Leaking Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Tele Rho ne: 518-402-9549 A listing of leaking underground and aboveground storage tanks_ The causes of the incidents are tank test failures, tank failures or tank overfills. In 2602, the Department•of Environmental . Conservation stopped providing updates to its original Spills Information Database. This database includes fields that are no longer available.#rornthe NYDEG.asofJanuary l, 7002.., Current information may be found In the NY LTANKS database. Department of Environmental Conservation. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2005 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: Not. reported NY CBS UST: Chemical Bulk Storage Database Source: NYSDEC Telephono: 518-402-9549 Faglities that store regulated hazardous substances in underground tanks of any sae Date of Government Version: 01101/2062 Date of Last EDR Contact; 10/2412005 Database Release Frequehcy: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 01/23/2006 NY MOSS UST: Mayor Oil Storage Facilities Database Source: NYSDEC Telephone: 51.8-402-9549 Facilities that may be onshore. facilities or vessels, with petroleum storage capacities of 400,000 gallons or greater. Date of Government Version: 01101/2002 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2005 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 10/2412005 NY HIST UST: Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database Source; Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549, Facilities that have petroleum storage capacities in excess of 1,100 gallons and less than 400,000 gallons, ' Date of Government Version: 01101/2002 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact; 10123/2006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 01122/2007 NY CBS AST: Chemical Bulk Storage Database Source: NYSDEC Telephone: 518402-9549 Facilities that store regulated hazardous substances in aboveground tanks with capacities of 185 gallons or greater, and/or in underground tanks of any size. Date of Government Version: 0110112002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2005 Database Release. Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 10/24/2005 Report# Prepared fort February5, 2007 Page# 14 of 17 SEC'TiON 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES -Continued... 1 NY HIST AST: Historical Petroleum Bulk Storage Database Source: [Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/0112002 Date of Last EDR Contact; 10/23l20D6 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned, Date of Next Scheduled Update: 01122/2007 NY MOSF AST: Major Oil Storage Facilities Database Source: NYSDEC Telephone: 518-402-9549 Facilities that may be onshore facilities or vessels, with petroleum storage capacities of 400,000 gallons or greater. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2002 Date of Last EDR Contact 07/25/2005 Database Release Frequency; No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: 14124/2005 NY NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518.402-8651 Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version:' 10/2612006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 11/2912006 Date of Next Scheduled. -Update: -02J2612007, DataibaseReiease:Fre uency`-Annual) NY SPILLS: spills Information Database Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 Data collected on spills reported to NYSDEC as required by one or more of the following: Article 12 of the Navigation Law, 6 NYCRR Section 613.8 (from PBS regs), or 6 NYCRR Section 595.2 (from CBS regs). It includes spills active as of April 1, 1986, as well as spills occurring since this date. Date of Government Version: 0911412006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/2412007 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04123/2007 j NY HIST SPILLS; SPILLS Database Source; Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9549 This database contains records of chemical and petroleum spill incidents, Under State law, petroleum and hazardous chemical spills that can impact the waters of the state must be reported by the spilfer (and, in some cases, by anyone who has knowledge of the spills). In 2002, the Department of Environmental Conservation stopped providing updates to its original Spills Informs#ion Database. This database includes fields that are no longer available from the NYDEC as of January 1, 2002. Current information may be found in the NY SPILLS database, Department of Environmental Conservation. , Date of Government Version: 01/0112002 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07!07/2005 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled Update: Not reported - NY ENG CONTROLS: Registry of Engineering Controls Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9553 Environmental Remediation sites that have engineering controls in place. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact; 12/14/2006 Date' of Next Scheduled Update: 03112!2007 Database Release Frequency' Quarterly NY INST CONTROL: Registry of Institutional Controls Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9553 Environmental Remediation sites that haus institutional controls in place. Date of Government Version: 1210112006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 1 211 412 0 06 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03112/2007 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Report# Prepared for/ February 5, 2007 Page# 15 of 17 11) SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... NY VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Agreements Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-9711 New York established its Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) to address the environmental, legal and financial barriers that often hinder the redevelopment and reuse of contaminated properties. The Voluntary Cleanup Program was developed to enhance private sector cleanup of brownfields by enabling parties to remediate, sites using private rather than public funds and to reduce the development pressures on "greenfield" sites. Date of Government Version: 12101/2006 Database Release Frequency: Seml-Annually NY DRYCLEANERS: Registered Drycleaners Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8403 A listing of all registered drycteaning facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2004 Database. Release Frequency: Vanes Date of Last EDP Contact, 12/1412006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/12/2007 Date of Last EDR Contact:, 05/21/2004 Date of Next Scheduled Update: Not reported NY BROWNFiELDS: Brownf€elds Site List Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 5.16-402-9764 A Brownfield is any real property where redevelopment or re -use may be complicated by the presence onpotential presence of a hazardous.waste, petroleum, pollutant,.ar contaminant Date of Government Version: 12/01/2006 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2006 Database Release Frequency:.Semi-Annually Date of Next Scheduled Update: 03/12-/2007 NY SPIES: State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8233 New York State has,z% state program which has been approved by the United States Environmental, . Protection Agency for the control of wastewater and stormwater discharges in accordance with the Clean Water Act_ Under New York State law the program is known as the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) and is broader in scope than that required by the Clean Water Act in that it controls point source discharges to groundwaters as well as surface waters, Date of Government Version: 11/08/2006 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY AIRS: Air Emissions Data Source: Department'of Environmental Conservation Telephone: '518102-8452 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/0512007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 05/07/2007 Date of Last EDR -Contact: 11/2012006 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 02/1912007 NY E DESIGNATION: E DESIGNATION SITE LISTING Source: New York City Department of City Planning Telephone: 718-595-6658 The (E (Environmental)) designation would ensure that sampling and remediation take place on the subject properties, and would avoid any significant impacts related to hazairlous materials at these locations., The (E) designations would require that the fee owner of the sites conduct a testing and sampling protocol, and remediation where appropriate, to the satisfaction of the NYCDEP before the issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings pursuant to the provisions of Section 11-15 of the Zoning Resolution (Environmental Requirements). The (E.) designations also include a mandatory construction -related health and safety plan which must be approved by NYCDEP. Date of Govemment Version- 08/01/2006 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2007 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/1612007 Report# Prepared for l February5, 2007 Page# 16 of 17 SECTION 3: DATABASES SEARCHED AND UPDATE DATES ...Continued... POTENTIAL SUPERFUND LIABILITY PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6064 A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/07/2006 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact; 0 1 /0212 0 0 7 Date of Next Scheduled Update: 04/0212007 Report# Prepared far/ February5, 2007 Page# 17 of l7 Aftk NYSDEC SPILL REPORT FORM DEC REGION:. 3 SPILL NUMBER: LL NAME: SCOTT DEC LEAD: R NAME: SANDRA SCOTT NOTIFIER'S NAME Aft 0004187 VPMCCABE SANDRA SCOTT CLR'S AGENCY: CITIZEN NOTIFIER'S AGENCY: CITIZEN CALLER'S PHONE: (845) 297-8532 NOTIFIER'S PHONE: 845 297-8532 SPILL DATE: 07/04/2000 SPILL TIME: 6:45 am CALL RECEIVED DATE: 07107/2000 RECEIVED TIME: 10:57 am SPILL LOCATION PLACE: SCOTT COUNTY: Dutchess STREET: 25 BEACH WOOD CIRCLE TOWNICITY: Wappinger COMMUNITY: WAPPINGERS FALLS CONTACT: CALLER CONTACT PHONE: (914) 297-8532 SPILL CAUSE: -Tank-Failure SPILL REPORTED BY: Resporisible Party SPILL SOURCE: Private Dwelling WATERBODY: CALLER REMARKS: caller reporting a spill of material from a tank failure_ partial clenup was preformed and no callback was necessary_ still some residue left in house. ATERIAL CLASS SPILLED RECOVERED RESOURCES AFFECTED ? Oi! Petroleurn 50,00 G 0.00 G Soil, POTENTIAL SPILLERS ,OMPANY ADDRESS CONTACT .ESIDENCE 25 BEACH WOOD CIRCLE WAPPINGE.RS FALLS NY Tank Number I Tank Size Test Method Leak Rate Gross Failure DEC REMARKS: Prior to Sept, 2004- data translation this spill Lead _DEC Field was "MCCABE" SEE TWO PAGE UPDATE BY V. MCCABE; IDC TO FINISH CLEANUP. This spill was updated 08111/20A4 from info in V. McCabe's data files. 'Date:' = 07107100, 'Phone' =. - -,'Ste Insp' = 711012000. 513/05 DECinspection 412105: no odor or other sign of contamination in basement; probably much less than 10 gallons could have leaked to soil and that would be relatively immobile under the concrete floor --any contamination would logically degrade gradually under those conditions so spill can be closed JH PIN T & A . COST CENTER 1 reated On: 07/07/2000 ate Printed: 4/20/2006 Last Updated:, 11/21/2005 1 AdMkk NYSDEC SPILL REPORT FORM Aft DEC REGION: 3 SPILL NUMBER: 0004187 SPILL NAME: SCOTT DEC LEAD: VPMCCABE l CLASS: B3 CLOSE DATE: MEETS STANDARDS: False Created .On: 07/07/2000 Date Printed: 4/20/2006 Last Updated: 11/21/2005 2 Spill Incidents Database Search More information: fnvirJonrrtenlL Remedi4tion Databa5gs Glossary of S ills Database Terms More searches: lVewill xpidents-varch C1kbmr LlAk ifinterMs Spill. Record Administrative Information DEC Region: 3 Spill Number: 0501208 Spill Date/Time Spill Date; 04/28/20:05 Spill Time: 09:45 PM Call Received Date: 04/28/2005 Call Received Time: 09:54 PM Location Spill Name: GETTY STATION #169 Address: 1499 ROUTE 9 City: WAPPINGER FALLS County: Dotchess Spill Description Material Spilled: Amount Spilled: Gasoline Gal. Cause: Unknown Source: Gasoline Station Resource Affected: Soil ( - Waterbody: Record Close htt,D://www,dee,state.nv.us/efmx/extanpslderfoills,Dillsldetails.cfm?-Dageid=2 1/10/2007 Spill incidents Database Search Page 2. of 2 Date Spill Closed: Not closed If you have questions about this reported incident, please contact the Regional Office where the incident occurred. mum Other Links of Interest Information about the Spill Res onse and Remediation Program Phone Numbers for y ill s onse and Re edlation httn://www.dec.state.nv.us/cfmx/extativs/derfoillsnillsldetails.cfin?bap-eid=2 1/10/2007 Spill Incidents Database Search Page I of 2 Spill Incidents Database Search More information: Eravironmenta! R t�diatignDatabases Glossary of Spills Database Terms More searches, New ill Irf.dents Search Qther Link* -n Spill Record MTBE detected at this location, Click here for more information on MTBE. Administrative Information DEC Region: 3 Spill Number: 9105963 Spill Date/Time Spill Date: 09/03/1991 Spill Time: 12:45 PM Call Received Date: 09/03/1991 Call Received Time: 01:09 PM Location Spill Name: GETTY S/S # 169 Address: 145 RT. 9 City: WAPPINGERS FALLS County: Dutchess Spill Description Material Spilled: Amount Spilled: Gasoline 0.0000 lbs. MTBE (METHYL-TERT-BUTYL ETHER) lbs. Cause: Tank Test Failure Source: Gasoline Station Resource Affected: Soil httti://www.dee.state.nv.us/cfrnx/extanns/derfoiIknills/detaile cfrn`?naveid-7. 1 /10/7.007 r Spill Incidents Database Search � Page 2 of 2 Waterbody: PBS #: Tank #: Tank Size: 0 Test Method: Unknown Leak Rate: 0.00 Record Close Date Spill Closed: 04/28/2005. "Date Spill Closed" means the date the spill case was closed by the case manager in the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department). The spill case was closed because either; a) the records and data submitted indicate that the necessary cleanup and removal actions have been completed and no further remedial activities are necessary, or b) the case was closed for administrative reasons (e.g., multiple reports of a single spill er rese consolidated lit torequire'�addito al)remed al wok intrel ton ...................._.. single... . 9 to the spill, if in the future it determines that further action is necessary. If you have questions about this reported incident, please contact the Regional Office where the incident occurred. Other Links of Interest InforrrLatian about the Spill Response and Remediation an-Lru Phone Numbers for 5011 Response and Remediation httn://www.dee.state.nv.us/efmx/extanns/derfoil/mills/details nfrn7naQPid=) 111 f)/)007 Spill Incidents Database Search More information: nv'rpnmen aRemedatio arabases Glossary -of Spills Database Terms More searches: NeVir Spill In[dens Sear �i (Quer i�cs_of In.��rre��E,. Spill Record Administrative Information DEC Region: 3 i Spill Number 9.105218 Spill Date/Time Spill Date: 09/10/1991 Spill Time: 08:00 AM Call Received Date: 09/10/1991 Call Received Time: 08:58 AM Location Spill Name: GETTY S/S #169 Address: 1.45 RT. 9 City: WAPPINGERS FALLS County: Dutchess Spill Description Material Spilled: Amount Spilled: Gasoline 0.0000 lbs. Cause: Tank Test Failure Source: Gasoline Station Resource Affected: Soil P ( Waterbody: PBS #: Tank #: Tank Size: 0 }itFn /hxnxnxr rlar. etatP tzv7r/rfmv/pvtannclriPrfnillenillc/riP,tailc r.fm7naaairl=� 1111)/?.007 Spill Incidents Database Search Page 2 of 2 Test Method: Unknown Leak Rate: 0.00 i Record Close Date Spill Closed: 01/27/1992 "Date Spill Closed" means the date the spill case was closed by the case manager in the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department). The spill case was closed because either; a) the records and data submitted indicate that the necessary cleanup and removal actions have been completed and no further remedial activities are necessary, or b) the case was closed for administrative reasons (e.g., multiple reports of a single spill consolidated into a single spill number). The Department however reserves the right to require additional remedial work in relation to the spill, if in the future it determines that further action is necessa ry. If you have questions about this reported incident, please contact the l e 10 al office where the incident occurred. Other Links of Interest Information about the Spill Response and Remediation Program Phone Numbers for Spili Response and Remediation i,++..•!/.,n,R=� AA, ofQfP"ir!'f'T ?'ngCrP.jA=7. . 1/10/2007 EPA - Envirofacts Warehouse - F11 Page 1 of 2 U.S. #*Vk*- ft Facility Registry System (FRS) i Recent Addition$ I fpnta�t Us I Print Version EE Search; ....- ........_....._ 4. Ep Home. > Pnvira ads > FRS > Report Facility Detail Report Facility Name_ Location - GREER�YOTA, INC. $u tmentai Address: City Name_ WAPPINGER T State NY Court Name: DUTCHESS IP/Postal Co e: 12590 EPA Region: 02 Con ressional Dlatrict Number_ 6eislative District �fumber 19 HUC -Code: 02020008 Feder�i _Facility._ NO Tribal. -Land: NO Latitude: 41.59266 Long.ittA -73.90949 Method: ADDRESS MATCHING -HOUSE NUMBER Reference Point Description PLANT ENTRANCE (GENERAL) puns Number_ Re_g istryl D: 110011024925 i is thisfo,i Environmental Interests Information IlInformation Environmental Hata Updatec Srrstem System ID Interest T Source QAt—e 3�(Q02 NPDES NON- NPDES PCS NYU MAJOR PERMIT Facility Mailing Addresses r Affiliation Tvpq . Delivery Point City Name State CONTACTIGENERAL INC ER TOYOTA, WAPPINGER NY E12590 I r+ t in nn -7 ", EPA - Envirofacts Warehouse - FII NAICS Codes No NAICS Codes returned. SIC Codes No SIC Codes returned. Contacts No Contacts returned. Organizations No Organizations returned. Alternative Names No Alternative Names returned. Query executed on: ..IAN -11-2007 EPA Home I Privacand Securitotice.I ContactEJ Last updated on Thursday, January 11th, 2007 Page 2 of 2 U44,:,.//..,,,... J, _./ _..:_ rc : -__1 a+1 A:-- 4:---1-*- 1 11 1 /1)()W7 EPA - Envirofacts Warehouse - F11 5,kt Page 1 of 2 Facility Registry System (FRS) �tecent6dditions. I _CQD aC Us Iit r VersiM EF Search: ....... EPA Home > t nvirofads > ERS > Report Facility Detail Report FacRli Name_ RIVERVII?W TRANSM1551ON Location Address: 87 RTE 9 implemental Address: City Narne_ _ WAPPINGERS FALLS .State NY Coun ame: DUTCHESS ZIP/Postal Code_ 12590 EPA Region: 02 Congressional District Number: 19 Legislative District Number: NY HUC Code: 02020008 Fedq..ral Eacil_i,;. NO Tribal Land: O- NO- Latitude: 41.579068 Latitude: LonaRtude: -73,909586- 73,909586Method: Method:ADDRESS MATCHING -HOUSE NUMBER Reference Point Description: 11 PLANT ENTRANCE (GENERAL) Runs Number: 780601589 Registry ID: 110006098178 �i�ltap this f��t��t Environmental Interests. Information information System ID Environmental © ataoucce. last Iodatednyirortmenta[ Date Supplemental Interests: System Interest Type RCRAINFO NYD9$693842TNOT IN A IMPLEMENTER UNIVERSE 07/0811999 Facility Mailing Addresses 4 Affiliation Type 110elivery_OoRflj Information System CONTACT/GENERAL 87 RTE 9WAPPINGERS FACES NY 12590 RCRAINFO h++;,• 11 . , ,.,.,i, ,�..lon.,,« . rte; a+1 a; M— 1 11 1 PlAn" EPA - Envirofacts Warehouse - FII NAICS Codes No NAICS Codes returned. SIC Codes No SIC Codes returned. Contacts No Contacts returned. Organizations No Organizations returned. Alternative Names No Alternative Names returned. Query executed on: JAN -11-2007 EPA Horne I Privacy and Security. Notico I Contact Us Last updated on Thursday, January 11 th, 2007 Page 2 of 2 htfn-//na¢rnill P.tia crnu/pn6rn/fii n11Pry MI rlicn nrnaratn farilitu 1111 Ofia? EPA - Envirofacts Warehouse - FII "I, Vol 3IT4,1. Facility Registry System (FRS) F3gce Additions I Cogr.L _a I print Version EF Search �A EPA Home > Envlrpiacts > FRS > Report Facility Detail Report Facility Name: I R S CLEANERS Location Address: 85 RTE 9 - LAFAYETTE PLZ SWpmental Address: City Name: WAPPINGERS FALLS State NY Coun.NamgL DUTCHESS ZIPIPostal Code: 12590 EPA Region: F 02 Can r ssional District Nurrtber: LegislativeDistrict Number: NY HUG Code: Federal Facility NO Tribal Land: NO Latitude`. 41.58Q7 Longitude: -73.91 Method: ADDRESS MATCHING -HOUSE {NUMBER Reference Point Description: 11 PLANT ENTRANCE= (GENERAL) Duns Number: Re_g:-sEry__ll],_. 1 1 0 006 1 01 226 Environmental Interests. Page 1 of 2' Information Information System ib Environmental data Source Last U�Sdated Date Supplemental Environmental ' Interests: System Interest Type RCRAINFO 11 [N-OYRaa0D18I CEnSOC NOTIFICATION (RCRA) D3/14/1995 Facility Mailing Addresses Affiliation TY�e_ IFDelivery PointF b.ifv,•�inonv..�}. nnn �rn�r�nn�:i+•n/fi Ci Name State Posta! Information Code 1$ygLe m CONTACT/GENERAL 45 RTE 9 - LAFAYETTE PLZFALLS WAPPINGERS NY 12590 R.CRAINFO --1, Ail Ain- nr -- � 1 11 1 llnn,7 EPA - Envirofacts Warehouse - FII Page 2aof 2 CONTACT/OWNER 1119 DWANE S7 POUGHKEEPSIE NY IRCRAINFO ONTACT/REGULATORY F 45 RTE 9 - IF\WAPPINGERS LAFAYETTE PLZ FALLS NY Fj�0][RCR�INFO NAICS Codes No NAICS Codes returned. SIC Codes No StC Codes returned. Contacts Organizations Affiliation Type INarvie DUNS Number Information Systern Mailing Address. CONTACT/OWNER SEBASTIANO VONA RCRAINFO 11 View Alternative Names No Alternative Names returned. Query executed on: JAN -11-2007 EIA Horne I Priv. y.ansedudly Notice I Contact s Last updated on Thursday, January 11th, 2007 1'44-11--1, — -- A+1 A;— ,,..,,,....,— -R,414+- 1 /11 /")nn' EaviroMapper fbr EnviroFacts Page I of 1 U4. E#tv1MM#"WPM#ftfkO Ag"ty UEnviroMapper for Envirofacts Cwtact Us EPA Home >EnviroMeoper > FnviropAapper for Eovirofa�Aii > Mapping Result zcyam M,N.fl.jj A.,O, g. 9. 1, W, z Out Conmh.nq. ba,kilroundr At as map .. ...... . ... .... . ... . . ..... click t4laip to ko, ftacenier *show siie info 0 Identify 6 EPA Home I Privacy and Security Noice I FOVk I Contacl Us task updated on Monday, Ootober 31, 2005 URL http:tfl 34.67.99.122/onvWWemef.asp 4,f+rvJ/1 1,1 0.7 00 107 .,,*, 1111 I7A1Y7 Loc4tor Map in Property Shark Reports Page 1 of 3 Overview Land Description Neighborhood code 65 Address _..W__. Tax Assessment Acres 0,27 Section, block & lot 6,157-4-614.375 Primary owner Briscoe, Percy W Muni code & parcel ID 135660-T7665 Full market value $211,458 County Loc Dutchess County Total assessed value $101,500 - Star Schl Taxable Bank Eff Date Assessed value of land $50,000 Owner 0 Tax roll year 2003 Owner Percy W Briscoe O/o residential 0.00% 152 Old Post Rd Wapp FIs, NY 12590-0000 Search for phone number Site & Land Desc Neighborhood Rating Land Description Neighborhood code 65 Not Listed Lot Size and Value Site Rating Acres 0,27 Site desirability 2 condition Land influence Utilites & Ratings t Utilities 3 Site Features Water supply 2 Sewer type 2 Assessment Revaluation Taxes Revaluated land value Not Listed County Revaluated total value Not Listed Municipal APpor condition School Bank and Mortgage t village Bank code Not Listed Star Town Taxable Mortgage number Not Listed Star Schl Taxable Bank Eff Date Not Listed Sch Relevy f 3 L55 t 0 Vlg Relevy 20.05-01-01 Tax code Appraiser's Comp No records found. $101,500 $101,500 $101,500 Not Listed $101,500 $101,500 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Other Building and Yard Improvements Improvement Structure Improv Overall Inventory number code APpor condition date t 1 RP2 0 3 .2005-01-01 2 RG4 0 3 2005-01-01 f 3 L55 t 0 3 20.05-01-01 Improvement # 1 Location Year Built # 1 Improvement number 1 Year built 1930 Site number 1 httn://www.l)roi)ertyshark.com/masoin/ny dutchess/Reports/showsection.html?propkey=55... 1/1012007 5*1 PropertyShark Reports Value # New improvement replacement cost None Func Obs Pct None Record type R Sale parcel indicator p Page 2 of 3 Description # 1 Dimension 2 None Square feet of improvement 128 measurement code 3 Grade C good 50 Uci Cd None Quantity 1 Improvement # 2 Location Year Built # 2 Improvement number 2 Year built 1930 Site .number 1 Building number None Description # 2 Value # 2 New improvement replacement cost Func Obs Pct Record type Sale parcel indicator Improvement # 3 Location Improvement number 3 Site number 1 Building number. None Value # 3—y__.__._._�_._..___._. New improvement replacement cost None Func Obs Pct None Record type R Sale parcel indicator P Sales History No records found. Photos Year Built # 3 Year built Description # 3 1930 Dimension 2 Dimension 2 None 576 Square feet of improvement 378 None measurement code 3 None Grade C R % good None P Uci Cd None Quantity 1. Improvement # 3 Location Improvement number 3 Site number 1 Building number. None Value # 3—y__.__._._�_._..___._. New improvement replacement cost None Func Obs Pct None Record type R Sale parcel indicator P Sales History No records found. Photos Year Built # 3 Year built Description # 3 1930 Dimension 2 None Square feet of improvement 576 measurement code 3 Grade C good None Uci Cd None Quantity 1 Appraiser photo Swap Beta - photos for 152 Old Post Rd Appraisers have .spoken, and PropertyShark has listened! Appraisers can now share photos using our Appraiser Photo Swap. How It works: • Swap participation requires subscriptions to both Comparables and Photos • Upload your own photos to download those uploaded by other users Upload your own photos or learn more No Swap photos available for this property yet. Maps http://www,propertyshark.corn/masonlny jutchessIReports/showsection.html?propkey=55... 1/10/2007 PropertyShark Reports �, Page 3 of 3 Recent Reports 1/10/2007 152 Old Post Rd 1/5/2007_ 2340 1 Ave Disclaimer Click on the map to expand! Wappinger (Town, Outside Of Villages), NY Manhattan, NY Copyright 2006 by Property Research Partners LLC All data comes from government sources. No attempt has been made to validate it. No attempt has been made to validate the accuracy of the programming of this web site. Do not rely on this report to support investment decisions. The only authoritative source for the information in this report is the government agencies from which the data was acquired. http,llwww.propertyshark.camlmasonlny jutchess/Reportslshowsection.html?propkey=5 5 ... 1/10/2007 Property5hark Reports Overview Address Section, block & l__ot Muni code & parcel ID County Loc Owner Owner Site & Land Description Page 1 of 3 Mattison, Florence E $297,917 $143,000 $35,000 2003 0.00% Neighborhood Rating Tax Assessment 6.157-4-649.374 Primary owner 1356008 Full market value putchess County Total assessed value Site desirability Assessed value of land Municipal Tax roll year Florence E Mattison % residential Wapp FIs NY 4 12590-0000 0 Search for phone number Not Listed Page 1 of 3 Mattison, Florence E $297,917 $143,000 $35,000 2003 0.00% Neighborhood Rating Land Description Neighborhood code 65 Revaluated land value Lot Size and Value Site Rating Acres 3.54 Site desirability 1 Municipal Lane! Influence Utilites & Ratings Utilities 4 Site Features Water supply 2 Sewer type 2 Assessment Revaluation Structure Taxes Overall Revaluated land value Not Listed County $143,000 Revaluated total value Not Listed Municipal $143,000 Apport School $143,000 Bank and Mortgage 0 Village Not Listed Bank code Not Listed Star Town Taxable $143,000 Mortgage number Not Listed Star Schl Taxable $143,000 Bank Eff Date_ Not Listed Sch Relevy Not Listed Vlg Relevy Not Listed Tax code Not Listed Appraiser's Comps No records found. Other Buildinq and Yard improvements Improvement Structure Improv Overall Inventory number code Rcnid condition date Apport 1 RP6 0 3 2005-01-01 2 RP1 0 3 2005-01-01 3 FC1 0 3 2005-01-01 Improvement #I Location -Year Built # I Improvement number 1 Year built Site number 1 1997 http://www.propertyshark.cornlmasonlReportslshowsection.html?section=&propkey--5569.. 1/10/2007 Property Shark Reports � Value # 1 New improvement replacement cost None Func Obs Pct None Record type R Sale parcel indicator P Improvement # 2 Location Improvement number 2 Site number 1 Building number None Value # 2 New improvement replacement cost None Funs Obs Pct None Record type R Sale parcel indicator P Improvement # 3 Location Improvement number 3 Site number 1 Building number None Value # 3 New improvement replacement cost None Func Obs Pct None Record type R Sale parcel indicator P Sales History No records found. Photos Page 2of3 Description # 1 Dimension 2 None Square feet of improvement B8 measurement code 3 Grade C good None Uci Cd None Quantity 1 Year Built # 2 Year built 1997 Description # 2 Dimension 2 None Square feet of improvement 308 measurement code 3 Grade C % good None Uci Cd None Quantity I Year Built # 3 Year built 1997 Description # 3 Dimension 2 None Square feet of improvement 357 measurement code 3 Grade C % good None Uci Cd None Quantity 1 Appraiser Photo Swap Beta - photos for 154 Oid Post Rd Appraisers have spoken, and ProperkyShark has listened! Appraisers can now share photos using our Appraiser Photo Swap. How It works: • Swap participation requires subscriptions to both Comparables and Photos • Upload your own photos to download those uploaded by other users Upload your own photos or learn more No Swap photos available for this property yet. Maps http://www.prope.rtyshark.comt asonlReportslshowsection.html?section=&propkey=5569.., ' 1/10/2007 PropertyShark Reports Page 3 of 3 Click on the map to expand! I Recent .Reports 1/10/2007�-�-- 154 Old Post Rd Wappinger (Town, outside of Villages), NY 152 Old Post Rd Wappinger (Town, Outside Of Villages), NY 1/512007 2340 1 Ave Manhattan, NY Disclaimer Copyright 2006 by Property Research Partners LLC All data comes from government sources. No attempt has been trade to validate it. No attempt has been made to validate the accuracy of the programming of this web site. Do not reit' on this report to support investment decisions. The only authoritative source for the information in this report is the government agencies from which the data was acquired. httn:llwww.i)roAertyshark, couilmason/Reportslshowsection.httnl?section=&propkey=5 569... 1/14/2007 PropertyS*k Reports Page 1 of 3 Overview Structure Taxes Revaluated land value Address w County Tax Assessment__ - _ __ i Section, block & lot 6.157-4-64 5 -9.33 Primary owner Owen, Victor N Muni code & parcel ID 135600-97687 Full market value $989,583 County Loc Dutchess County Total assessed value $475,000 Star Schl Taxable Bank Eff Date Assessed value of land $400,000 Owner Tax roll year 2003 Owner Victor N Owen % residential 0.000/0 Wapp FIs NY ,12590-0000 Search for phone number Site & Land Description Neighborhood Rating Land Description Neighborhood code 65 Lot Size and Value Site Rating Acres 9.03 Site desirability i Land Influence Utilites & Ratings Utilities 3 Site Features Water supply 2 Sewer type 2 Assessment Revaluation Structure Taxes Revaluated land value Not Listed County Revaluated total value Not Listed Municipal date School Dank and Mortgage Village Bank code Not Listed Star Town Taxable Mortgage number Not Listed Star Schl Taxable Bank Eff Date Not Listed Sch Relevy 2005-01-01 Vlg Relevy Tax code praiser's Comps No records found. Other Building and Yard Improvements $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Not Listed $500,000 $480,700 Not Listed Not Listed Not Listed Improvement Structure Improv Overall Inventory number code Rcnld condition date Apport 1 RP2 0 3 2005-01-01 2 RP2 0 3 2005-01-01 i Improvement # 1 Location Year Built # 1 Improvement number 1 Year built 1931 Site number 1 Building number None Description# 1 http _//www.propertyshark.com/mason/Reports/showsection.html?section=&propkey=5 569... 1/10/2007 PropertyShark Reports N Page 2 of 3 Square feet of improvement Value # 1 _ measurement code New improvement replacement cost None Grade Func Obs Pct None % good Record type R Uci Cd Sale parcel indicator P Quantity 160 3 C 50 None 1 Improvement # 2 Location Year Built # 2 Improvement number 2 Year built 1931 Site number 1 Building number None Description # 2 Dimension 2 None Value # 2 Square feet of improvement 18 New improvement replacement cost None measurement code 3 Func Obs Pct None Grade C Record type R 9/o good None Sale parcel indicator P Uci Cd None Quantity 1 Sales Histo No records found. Photos AQ rap icer Photo Swap Beta _photos for 158 old Post Rd Appraisers have spoken, and PropertyShark has listened! Appraisers can now share photos using our Appraiser Photo Swap, Now it works: • Swap participation requires subscriptions to both Comparables and Photos • Upload your own photos to download those uploaded by other users Upload your own photos or learn more No Swap photos available for this property yet. http: //www.propertyshark..comlmas onlReportslshowsection.html?section=&propkey=5 569... 1/10/2007 PropertyShark Reports . Recent Reports 1110/2007 158 Old Post Rd 154 Old Post Rd 152 Old Post Rd 1/6/2007 2340.1 Ave Disclaimer Click on the map to expand!: Wappinger (Town, Outside Of Villages), NY Wappinger (Town, Outside Of Villages), NY Wappinger (Town, Outside Of Villages), NY Manhattan, NY Page 3 of 3 Copyright 2006 by Property Research Partners LLC All data comes from government sources. No attempt has been made to validate it. No attempt has been made to validate the accuracy of the programming of this web site. Do not rely on this report to support investment decisions. The only authoritative source for the information in this report is the government agencies from which the data was acquired. httn://www.t)ropertyshark. corn/masonlReports/showsection.html?section—&propkey=5569... 11.1012007 APPENDIX D SITE PHOTOGRAPHS yr, x, y _ E ry lVIVITIO Ain r h W < r a e4#.' - �� r gh f 4-4 �, rc f 3 v a' View of hmdog W tok for pmp (ti d) ed Wch field (idi) at 159 Cold Poi, Rte. View of hoop od Unks (far,nghi) ft wside= at 158 Old Post Road. t-15-p"l. �!� � 64 x` q t r7,1'4:� _ � � a ` � U SAS 02 ..� �z Nei{. Alliw _ Y y 3 y _ 5 x` q t r7,1'4:� _ � � a ` � U SAS 02 ..� �z jmAF �a� • n, 'y 1& _ IX` 5 " 5 , x - to v� to 40 NEV. o ,i, 1 i qwW ]] 1E �.. 3 '� 3 " f-? aT y}pp s - �-�3et awn % 4 � p us AV zip s { s +L WINall MGM r' i a °WAR A n z "NIX } q; sp a W "pit! �e ,r11 M14 �WE Az lea 3 x 2a amountL t tOno +tyP 00 Vi" i APPENDIX E QUALIFICATIONS Jrj—NJ CONRAD GEOSGIENGE CORP. One Civic Center Plaza, Suite 50.1 IL Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 8451454-254.4 d ANDRIA D. QUINN Geologist: Education - B.S., Geology, SUNY New Paltz, 2004 Training/Seminars • OSHA40-Hour Health and Safety Training, February, 2006 • 22"d Annual ,International Conference on Soils, Sediments and Water, 2006 - • NYSDEC & NYSDOH Soil Vapor Intrusion Training, July 2005 • ASTM Training: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Properties, October 2005. )Professional Affiliations National Ground Water Association Fields of Specialization • Phase I Environmental Site Assessments • Subsurface Field Investigations • Groundwater Sampling and Analysis • Research. and Data Compilation, • . Drafting and Report Preparation Experience Summary Prior to joining Conrad Geoscience, Miss Quinn earned a Bachelors Degree in Geology at the State University of New York at New Paltz. While earning her degree at New Paltz, Miss Quinn took part in a semester -long Field Methods course that focused on structural geology and mapping. While earning her degree, Miss Quinn worked as a Teaching Assistant at SUNY New Paltz. There, she prepared labs, ran. review sessions, and assisted students with daily material comprehension. At Conrad Geoscience, Miss Quinn assembles regulatory, historical, and environmental information for Phase l Environmental Site Assessments and other environmental investigations. Her other responsibilities include: well development and sampling; scientific and environmental research; map preparation and drafting; data management and comparison of test results to regulatory standards; records _.. review;.and report preparation. _...... .. _. Representative Projects Field Technician and Geologist for Phase I site assessment of a variety of . residential, commercial and vacant properties in the Hudson Valley. Responsible for preparation of Phase I ESA reports, including regulatory and historical records review, site inspections, and drafting. Field Technicians and Geologist for a groundwater monitoring program at a municipally operated highway department garage in Dutchess County. Responsible for supervising injection of chemical oxidants for remediation of a gasoline spill. Geologist for a Remedial Action Program at a plastics manufacturing facility in Dutchess County. The groundwater monitoring program entails. quarterly sampling and monitored natural attenuation of the chlorinated solvent PCE. Miss Quinn conducted extensive research relating to environmental impacts of a contemplated municipal annexation in the Hudson River Valley. Research subjects included sand and gravel aquifer geometry and productivity; bedrock aquifers production; and present and future water usage projections. ANDRXA D. QUINN (con't) ) Representative Projects (con't) This project entailed use of a variety of natural resource maps and statistics. Miss Quinn coi-Apiled and analyzed data for a State Hazardous Waste Site in Newburgh, NY in order to delineate soil contamination. Duties included data review and analysis, map drafting, and preparation of a soil boring work plan. In support of litigation relating to SPDES violations; Miss Quinn conducted sampling events on a river in Westchester County; which included field reconnaissance; water quality testing, collecting samples for lab analysis, data tabulation and report preparation. I CoNRAD GFiaw ,NCE CORP. 1-1 1 CCONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. 1 One Civic Center Plaza, Suite 501 Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 8451454-2544 CHRISTOPHER B. BROWN, CPG Senior Hydrogeologist Education • M.A., Geology, Binghamton University, 1995 • B.A., Geology, Colgate University, 1992 Training/Seminars . Battelle -Conference: In -situ -On-site Bioremediation Symposium, June 2005 • . MTBE. Assessment, Remediation & Public Policy, June 2002 Principles of Groundwater Flow, Transport & Remediation, March 2001 • Low Cost Remediation Strategies for Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, September 2000 Accelerated Natural Attenuation, November 2000 • OSHA 40 -Hour Safety and Health Training, . 1995; Refresher 2006 Professional Affiliations • American Institute of Professional Geologists Certified Professional Geologist #10599 • National Ground Water Association • New York Council of Professional Geologists Fields of Specialization • Hazardous Waste Site Investigations • Property Transfer Assessments (Phase I and II) • UST Management and Replacement • UST Assessment and Spill Investigations • Subsurface Characterization Experience Summary Mr. Brown,. Senior Hydrogeologist and Vice President of Conrad Geoscience Corp., conducts geologic and hydrogeologic investigations related to hazardous waste site clZaracteriaf on, and petro leum"spill; ,?Base. and 11 property transfer assessments, soil and groundwater evaluations, subsurface characterization. His experience includes site assessments and remediation for a wide variety of commercial and industrial properties, including gas stations, landfills, construction yards, heavy industrial and manufacturing facilities, and large residential institutions. Mr. Brown is well versed in site assessment techniques, including monitoring well installation and groundwater sampling, soil boring programs, geophysical surveys, and Geoprobe investigations. Mr. Brown's responsibilities include project management, construction management, field investigations, staff supervision, and proposal and report preparation for all project phases. Prior to joining Conrad Geoscience, Mr. Brown worked as a geologist for U.S. Hydrogeologic, Inc. in Poughkeepsie, New York (1995-1996) where he conducted Phase I Site Assessments for commercial property transactions and performed and supervised a variety of subsurface investigations. At Binghamton University his studies focused on aqueous geochemistry and water -sediment interactions. .) CHRISTOPHER B. BROWN (con't) Representative Projects Senior Hydrogeologist for installation of groundwater remediation system at a former dry cleaning establishment. Supervised installation of groundwater extraction wells, including packer testing of bedrock fractures for hydrogeologic parameters. Supervised installation of groundwater treatment system. Senior Hydrogeologist for delineation of petroleum contaminated groundwater at a former -manufacturing and di stribution: facility: Assisted in preparation and development of a remedial program that relied on injection of chemical oxidants for degredation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Plan and approach were expedited to meet scheduled redevelopment. of the property. Project Manager and Hydrogeologist for a county -wide Department of Public Works fuel tank removal and replaceinent project. Responsible for project scheduling, tracking, bid specification review and approval, contractor selection and comprehensive proj ect management. Also responsible for tank closure site assessments, and soil and groundwater remediation, for each facility. Project Manager and Hydrogeologist for remediation of a landfill and demolition of a poultry processing plant at a facility in Sullivan County, New York. Completed groundwater monitoring program. Managed bidding and contractor selection for asbestos abatement, and supervised demolition, disposal and site restoration. 6N Project Manager and Hydrogeologist for a Phase II subsurface investigation at a manufacturing facility in the City of Poughkeepsie, New York. Specific concerns included impacts to the subject property from nearby industrial facilities, complex tank removal processes, asbestos abatements and satisfying a potential buyer's concerns relating to environmental. risk. Project Hydrogeologist for surficial soil and groundwater investigation for a Class 2 Inactive . Hazardous Waste Disposal Site in the Town of Fishkill, New York. Responsible for determining extent and magnitude of metals in surface sedirnents.and groundwater as part of a. Remedial Investigation (RI). Prepared Feasibility Study (FS) outlining remedial alternatives. Project Hydrogeologist for Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RDFS) at a Dutchess County plastics manufacturing plant at which chlorinated solvents and gasoline were detected in groundwater. Oversaw removal of USTs, performed soil boring/sampling program, supervised non-invasive geophysical investigation and source removal, and successfully. completed a groundwater remediation program under within the Voluntary Cleanup Program. Project Hydrogeologist for Interim Remedial Measure (LRM) at a former construction yard in Poughkeepsie, New York. Installed groundwater monitoring wells, and performed quarterly groundwater monitoring. Supervised soil remediation (metals and volatile organic compounds.) CONMD GEOSaENCE CORP. 1*1 APPENDIX F SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF REPORT 1*4 SCOPE OF SERVICES PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT The main objective of this Scope of Services is.to identify recognized environmental conditions, specifically; Any evidence of past or present releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the ground, groundwater, surface water, or structures of the subject property. This Scope of Services meets or exceeds Standard Practice E 7527-05 for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments of Commercial Real Estate. A. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS AND HISTORICAL SOURCES t. Environmental Record Sources Conrad Geosclence will obtain and review public records from standard sources that will help identify recognized environmental conditions relevant to the subject property: Federal NPL Site List Federal RCRA TSD List Federal Delisted NPL Site List Federal ERNS List Federal CERCLIS List State Lists of Hazardous Waste Sites Federal CERCLIS NFRAP List State Leaking Underground Storage Tank Lists State Registered Storage Tanks Lists State Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Site Lists Federal RCRA Generators List State VCP Sites Brownfields Sites To -the extent necessary; Conrad Geoscience will check one or more of the following additional records or local sources: .,,.•,•,. • -• . - - Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites Fire Department Planning Department Local Lists of Hazardous Waste[Contaminated Sites Building PermitAnspection Department Local/Regional Pollution Control Agency Local/Regional Water Quality Agency Local Electric Utility Companies r Local Lists of Registered Underground Storage Tanks Local Records of Emergency Release Reports Local Records of Contaminated Public Wells Department of HealtIVEnvironmental Division 2. Physical Setting Sources Conrad Geoscience will review one or more of the following Physical Setting Sources; USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map USES or State Bedrock Geology Maps USGS or State Groundwater Maps USGS or State Surficial Geology Maps Soil Conservation Service Soil Maps 3. Historical Use Information Conrad Geoscience will consult one or more historical sources to develop a history of previous uses or occupancies of the subject property in order to identify those uses or occupancies that are likely to have led to recognized environmental conditions: Aerial Photographs Fire Insurance Maps Property Tax Files Recorded Land Title Maps USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Local Street Directories Building Department Records Zoning/Land Use Records B. SITE RECONNAISSANCE On a visit to the property, Conrad Geoscience will visually and physically observe the property and any structures (interior and exterior) to the extent not obstructed by bodies of water, adjacent buildings, or other obstacles. The site reconnaissance will include; Periphery of the Property Periphery of Structures Interior of Structures Current Uses of Property Past Uses of Property Current Uses of Adjoining Properties CoNRAD GEOscmNCE CoRp. I C. Past Uses of Adjoining Properties Geologic and Topographic Conditions Description of Structures Potable Water Supply Hazardous Substances Storage Tanks Pools of Liquid PCB Containing Equipment Stains or Corrosion Pits, Ponds, Lagoons Stressed Vegetation Wastewater Septic Systems Uses of Surrounding Properties Hydrogeologic & Hydrologic Conditions Roads Sewage Disposal System Petroleum Products Odors Drums and Containers Means of Heating & Cooling Drains &Sumps Stained Soil or Pavement Solid Waste Dry wells, Injection wells, Floor drains Suspect Asbestos Containing Material INTERVIEWS WITH OWNERS, OCCUPANTS., AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS Conrad Geoscience will conduct interviews with individuals familiar with the uses and conditions on the subject property. Questions may be asked in person, by telephone, or in writing. An attempt will be made to interview one or more of the following: User of the Phase I ESA Owner or Key Site Manager Occupants Past Owners or Occupants and one or more government officials: Local Fire, -Health, or Environmental Age n cies .. Interviewees will ,be asked to provide helpful documents, if available: Site Plans, Maps, Drawings or Surveys Environmental Site Assessment Reports Environmental Audit Reports Environmental Permits Petroleum Bulk Storage Registrations Material Safety Data Sheets Community Right-toXnow Plan Safety Plans Hydrogeologic Reports Notices or Correspondence from Agencies Regarding Environmental Violations Hazardous Waste Generator Notices or Reports Geotechnical Studies D. REPORT PREPARATION Conrad Geoscience will prepare a written evaluation of the subject property summarizing results of the Records Review, Site Reconnaissance, and Interviews. The following will be included in the report: Site and Vicinity Characteristics Description of Structures and Other Improvements Current Uses of the Property Past Uses of the Property Current & Past Uses of Adjoining Properties (to the extent identified) Site Location Map Site Features Map 'Summary of Environmental Records Review Physical Setting Historical Use Hazardous Substances Stored, Handled of Disposed Petroleum Products Stored, Handled or Disposed Indications of Solid Waste Disposal Findings and Conclusions List of Information Sources Note: No attempt will be made to verify the presence of asbestos, radon, lead-based paint, lead in drinking water, or wetlands. Conrad Geoscience can provide additional services relating to those matters if requested. CONRAD GmscuNcE CORP. IN Scope and Limitations of Report Scope: The specific components of this investigation are as follows: Records Review: Federal and State records were reviewed and compiled into report format by an independent subcontractor to Conrad Geoscience. The following reasonably ascertainable standard environmental record sources were consulted U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information. System (CERCLIS) list; • USEPA CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned list; • USEPA National Priority List (NPL) and Delisted NPL sites; • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) list of hazardous waste generators, both sn alL.quantity_ and -large quantity (SQG and -LQG) and RCRA ... Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD) facilities list; • USEPA Emergency Response and Notification System (ERNS) list;. • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Petroleum Bulk Storage Inventory list (PBS); • NYSDEC Leaking Storage Tank list (LRST) and NYSDEC Spills List (SPILLS) • New York Active Solid Waste Facility Register (SWF); • New York Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites list (SHWS); and • Voluntary Cleanup Program sites Brownfields sites • Practically reviewable local records. Environmental ,Setting: Compiled through review of the.following physical setting sources: United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps New York State Geological Survey (NYGS) Surficial and Bedrock Geology Map of New York. . . History The history of the site and of the surrounding area was developed based on consultation with, any or all of the following reasonably ascertainable standard historical sources: aerial photographs, site maps, topographic maps, property tax files and"interviews with owners, operators and local officials. Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment This report is intended for the sole use of the Client listed on the cover page to this Report and must be used in its entirety. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or re -use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented herein is at the sole risk of said user. CONK D GEos©EIYCE COQ. ! I This written, analysis is an assessment of the property completely described in Section 3.0 and depicted in Figure 2, and is not valid for any other property or location. It is a representation of the property analyzed as of the dates of the record'reviews and site inspection. This report does not apply to any activities or events resulting in contamination after the date of site inspection or historic research. Observations were made as indicated within the report. Where access to .portions of the site or to structures on the site was unavailable or limited, Conrad Geoscience renders no opinion as to the presence of regulated or hazardous material or to the presence of indirect evidence relating to hazardous or regulated material in that portion of the site or structure. This Environmental report was performed in accordance with ASTM E 1527-05 Standard Practice for Phase Y Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Real Estate Transactions. The -findings and conclusions contained herein must not be considered scientific certainties, but probabilities based on professional judgment concerning the si ficance ,oKlca c of the limited st_ ._ _.. d data gathered during the course of this udy. The following ^ potential -site conditions are outside the scope of this report and were not the subject of analysis during this investigation: asbestos -containing materials, radon,, lead-based paint, . lead in drinking. water, and wetlands. Conclusions and findings of this report are is based in part on certain information provided by federal, state, and local officials and other parties referenced herein, and on information contained in the files of governmental agencies available at the time of this report. Reasonable attempts were made to interview users and property owners. No attempt was made to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of all information reviewed or received. The information provided on present and past property ownership does not constitute a title search. Corm GEosciENCE CORP. APPENDIX G REFERENCES AND SOURCES REFERENCES AND SOURCES DATABASE SEARCH 1. All federal, tribal, state. and local databases researched by EDR and Conrad Geoscience Corp. are provided in Appendix C. 2. All historical data sources (fire insurance maps, aerial photographs, city directories) researched by EDR are provided in Appendix C. PROPERTY HISTORY 1. General property history and ownership history was researched through a review of readily obtainable and practically reviewable sources. Sources utilized for this Phase I ESA. are as follows: • Wappinger Town Hall, Assessor's Office property records. • www.pro,periyshark.corn website. . • Dutchess County Real Property office and website http://gLoaccess.co.dtitchess.ny.0s/parcelaccess/disclaimer asp • Historical topographic and fire insurance maps (Appendix C), and a 1970 aerial photograph from Dutchess County. • Victor Owen, current owner 158-164 Old Post Road. INTERVIEWS 1. Interviews were conducted with the following persons: • Vince McCabe, NYSDEC Region 3. Interview conducted in person. Victor Owen, owner of 158-164 Old Post Road. Interviews conducted in person and over the phone. • Pat Adams, prospective -buyer. Interview conducted in person. Com GFosaFNcF_ CoRp. APPENDIX H PHASE II SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT C+ONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. s�ns.contadgea.com Enzironmtnta1.S6icntists One Civic Center Plaza, Suite 501, Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 • 845/454-2544 • fax: 845/45¢2655 February 23, 2007 Pat Adams Adams Fairacre Farms 765 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie, New York 12'603 Re: Phase 11 ESA, Collection of Soil & Groundwater Samples; 152,154 and 158- 164 Old Post Road. (Lot #s 649374, 649335, 614375), Town of Wappiager, Dutchess County, New York. Dear Mr. Adams: On January 18, 2007 Conrad Geoscience Corp. supervised the completion of soil borings in the vicinity of recognized environmental conditions identified during preparation of our draft Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). 1.0 INTRODUCTION The subject property consists of three tax lots along the eastern side of Old Post Road in the Town of Wappinger in, Dutchess County, New York (Figure 1). A portion of the Owens Parcel (158-164 Old Post Road) was formerly operated as an automotive repair and salvage facility. The area east of the Owens residence is used for the storage of automotive parts and salvaged materials. Storage or disposal of these materials may have resulted in areas of contaminated surface, or subsurface, soil. Areas of fill were also noted along the northern and southern property boundaries, Surface soil and surface water samples were collected from each of these areas and analyzed for contaminants which may have originated from site operations, or contaminated fill which may have been deposited on-site (Figure 2). Summarized below is a discussion of field tasks, analytical results, and conclusions. 2.0 GEOPROBE SOIL BORINGS & SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION Eight soil borings were completed using a truck -mounted GeoprobeTM unit equipped with 4 -foot long, 1 3/4 -inch diameter core barrels (macro -cores) fitted with acetate liners. All soil borings were conducted in accordance with NYSDEC/USEPA protocols. Borings were sampled continuously from the ground surface to a maximum depth of 15 Wappingers - Site Investigation y February 23, 2007 Page 2 feet below grade, to groundwater,, or to refusal, whichever was encountered first. The project geologist kept a detailed log of each core: Lithology, grain size, stratigraphic changes, color, and occurrence of groundwater were recorded. Conrad Geoscience screened soil samples in the field for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID) and headspaee techniques. Nine. soil samples, eight of which were from the surface, were submitted to a NYSDOH approved laboratory for analysis of the TCL and STARS list of VOCs via USEPA Method 8260, and the STARS list of semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) via USEPA Method 8270. Four samples from select locations were also analyzed for the Eight RCRA Metals. Results are provided in Tables 1, 2 and 3, attached. On-site soil generally consists of a moist, dark brown, silty sand ftom 0-1.5 feet below land surface (bls), followed by a denser layer of light brown, moist, clayey silt. Bedrock (refusal) was encountered in every boring, at depths ranging from 17 inches bls to 6 feet bls. Below is a description of each completed boring. GeoprobeTM Boring GB -1 encountered refusal at a depth of 3 feet bls. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 12 inches bls was retained for laboratory f analysis [GB -1 (0-12')]: All PID readings were 0 pprn. GeoprobeTMBoring GB -2, encountered refusal at a depth of 4.5 feet bls. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 12 inches bls was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -2 (0-12')]. All PID readings were 0 ppm. GeoprobeTMBoring GB -3, encountered refusal at a depth of 6 feet bls. Groundwater was not encountered, however the moisture content increased with depth, and the soil was -moist - wet at 6 feet bis. One soil sample from 0 to 12 inches bls was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -3 (0-12')]. One soil sample from 12 to 48 inches bls was also retained for laboratory analysis [GB -3 (12-48")]. All PID readings were 0 ppm. GeoprobeTM Boring GB -4, encountered refusal at a depth of 2.5 feet bls. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 12 inches bls was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -4 (0-12')]. All PID readings were 0 ppm. GeoprobeTM Boring GB -5, encountered refusal at a depth of 1.4 feet bls. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 17 inches bls.was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -5 (0-17')]. All PTI? readings were 0 ppm. Corm GEOSCIU4CE CORP. . rAg S Wappingers - Site Investigation February 23, 2007 Page 3 GeoprobeTM Boring GB -6, encountered refusal at a depth of 4.2 feet bis. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 12 inches bis was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -6 (0-12')]. All PID readings were 0 ppm. GeoprobeTmBoring GB -7, encountered refusal at a depth of 1.5 feet bis. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 18 inches bls was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -7 (0-18')]. All FID readings were 0 ppm. GeoprobeTM Boring GB -8, encountered refusal at a depth of 2.25 feet bis. Groundwater was not encountered. One soil sample from 0 to 12 inches bls was retained for laboratory analysis [GB -8 (0-12')]. All PID readings were 0 ppm. 3.0' FILL AREA SOIL & SURFACE WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION Four surface soil samples (0-6") were collected near areas of fill using a hand -auger. Two samples were collected from the fill area located along the northern property boundary, adjacent to Friendly Acura. Sample HA -1 was collected from the fill, and sample HA -2 was collected down-slope of the fill. Two samples were collected from the fill area along the southern property boundary. Sample HA -3 was collected from the fill, and sample HA -4 was collected down-slope of the fill, Samples were screened in the field for the presence of VOCs with a PID, and submitted to a NYSDOH approved laboratory for analysis of the TCL and STARS list of VOCs and the STARS list of SVOCs via USEPA Methods 8260 and 8270, respectively. Results are provided in Tables 1 and 2, attached. Two surface water samples, PW -1 and PW -2, were collected from wetland areas closest to each filled area (northern and southern, respectively) using dedicated polyethylene bailers. Samples were submitted for analysis of the TCL and STARS list of VOCs via USEPA Method 8260 Results are provided in Table 4, attached. . 4.0 ON-SITE SUPPLY WELL SAMPLE COLLECTION On February 7, 2007, supply well samples were collected from the residences at 158 and 164 Old Post Road to evaluate groundwater quality. SW -158 was collected from the tap located in the kitchen, and SW -164 was .collected from a spigot located outside, on the easternmost exterior wall of the house. Prior to sample collection, the wells were purged for approximately 15 minutes in order to draw representative .formation water in the wells. Samples were submitted for analysis of VOCs via USEPA Method 524.2. Results are provided in Table 5, attached. CONME) GFOSCMgCE CORP. rig Wappingers- - Site Investigation February 23, 2007 ( Page 4 5.0 RESULTS Analytical results were compared to applicable regulatory standards [6NYCRR Part 375 (soil) and 6NYCRR Part 700-705 (water)], and are provided in the attached tables. Copies of laboratory reports are also attached. The samples are discussed below: 5.1 Geoprobe Soil Boring Samples GB -1 (042"): No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. This sample was not analyzed for the Eight RCRA Metals. GB -2 (0-12"): No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. Arsenic (13.8 mg/L); barium (434 mg/L); cadmium (142 mg/L); lead (427 mg/L); mercury (0.737 mg/L); and silver (3.06 mg/L) were the only metals detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. GB -3 (0-•12"). No VOCs were detected. Benzo(a)anthracene (1,690 [tg/L); benzo(a)pyrene (1,330 µg/) ); benzo(b)fluoranthene (1,150 gg/L); benzo(k)fluoranthene (1,470 µ.g/L); and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (636 ltg/L) were the only SVOCs detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. Lead (383 mg/L) was the only metal detected at a concentration exceeding NYSDEC standards. GB -3 (12-48"): No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. No metals were detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. GB -4 (0-12"): No VOCs or SVOCs wet -e detected. This sample was not analyzed for the Eight RCRA Metals. . GB -5 (0-1T'). No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. This sample was not analyzed for the Eight RCRA Metals. GB -6 (0-12"): No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. No metals were detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. GB -7 (0-18"): No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. This sample was not analyzed for the Eight RCRA Metals. GB -8 (0-•12"): No VOCs or SVOCs were detected. Lead (194 mg/L) was the only metal detected at a concentration exceeding NYSDEC standards. a Wappingers, - Site Investigation February 23, 2007 Page 5 5.2 Fill Area Surface Soil and Surface Water Samples No VOCs or SVOCs were detected in any of the four surface soil samples collected from the fill areas (HA -1, HA -2, HA -3 and HA -4). No VOCs were detected in the surface water samples PW -1 and PW -2; collected from wetland areas adjacent to fill. 5.3 On -Site Supply Well Sampling No VOCs were detected in supply well samples collected from the 158 and 164 Old Post Road residences. 6.0 DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS A substantial amount of solid waste remains from automotive salvaging and repair operations east of the Owens residerice at 158 Old Post Road. Based on analytical data and field observations, this waste appears to have contributed to minor, shallow, surface soil contamination (0-12" below grade). Each of the five soil, samples analyzed for metals contained detectable concentrations of arsenic, barium, chromium, lead and mercury. Three of the five samples contained metals at concentrations that exceeded NYSDEC standards. Metals appear to be restricted to the. shallow surface soil (0-12") as demonstrated by the lack of metals at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards in sample GB -3 (12-48"). Only one soil sample, GB -3 (0-12"), contained detectable SVOCs. These contaminants also appear to be restricted to the shallow surface soil, as demonstrated by the lack of SVOCs in the soil sample collected from the deeper interval, GB -3 (12-48,,). Following removal of solid waste, it will be necessary to manage surface soil in the area of the .automobile, salvage and repair operations (analysis, excavation, and relocation/disposal). No VOCs were detected in supply well samples collected from the 158 and 164 Old Post Road residences, indicating that on-site groundwater has not been affected by site operations, or nearby State listed Hazardous Waste Sites (former Greer Toyota). Soil samples collected from fill along the northern and southern property boundaries (HA -1 and HA -3) contained no detectable VOCs or SVOCs. Samples were collected from the surface of fill material and may not be -representative of soil quality in other areas within the fill. Surface soil samples collected down-slope of the fill areas (HA -2 and HA -4), also did riot contain VOCs. or SVOCs at detectable concentrations. In addition, surface water COrRAD GEOSUE rce CORP. 111 Wappingers - Site Investigation. February 23, 2007 Page 6 samples collected from wetland areas located doom --gradient of each fill area contained no detectable VOCs. The fill area along the northern property boundary does not appear to exterid onto the subject property and is not considered to be a recognized environmental condition. However, the exact location of the southern property boundary in relation to the area of fill is not known. A portion of the fill may be within the boundary of the subject property, and the fill has not been completely characterized_ We recommend further investigations to evaluate the impact to the subject property. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not. hesitate to call. Sincerely, CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Christopher B. Brown, CPG Senior Hydrogeologist ::... attachments CONRAD GEOSCIENCE CORP. Ing 'I.. l =ira —77F. — ;i��-�lir�'^'�''" i!' g/p �CI�`'"�'Mh r . - i' j� * 4 f•i� ����'.S .!`'1 �„K a. �e:� ! �F• :1V-1 �I =.1'a. � '•G• 3 .s•° �,. i� FIC iri-"-«+`. ray- » - t�i: ,S• l_ -'1 ri',. ; _ �,c'" �` ,” ��" , :� 14 ;F �. `- �;f � i` , i w � • j s' e d 1 \, r. SU: S a i..- Y far �� Frr r wt 14^ f 1 �'� •� .ice r.�h .�•. � :, j `; 4• ` r `�-' `�_ ,�`r . I orf �: • �" SKS I .tu at g f 4! ts� lag I Table 1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Geoprobe and Hand Auger Soil Samples; (1SFPA Method 8260; collected January 18, 2007; 152-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Constituent' NYSDEC Sample Identification Limit GB -1 (0-12' GB -2 (OA2") . GB -3 GB -3 GB -4 GB -5 (0-12") (12-48") (0-12") (0-17") GB -6 (0-12") Bromodichloromethane 1D,G002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8,29 ND<11.1 Bromomethane 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29, ND<11.1 Bromoform 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Carbon tetrachloride 760 ND<9.101 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8,29 ND<11.1 Chloroethane 1,9002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Chloromethane 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8,29 ND<11.1 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<&98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Chloroform 370 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Dibromochloromethane . NE ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 1,1-Dichloroethane 270 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11,1 1,2-Dichloroethane 20 ND<9.10 ND<12,5 ND<6.50 ND<8,98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 1,1-Dichloroethene 330 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 cis -1, 2-Dichloroethene 250 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 190 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<41.1 1,2-Dichloropropane 10,0002 N.D<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8,98 ND<10.3 ' ND<8.29 ND<11.1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8,98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<41.1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<B.29 ND<11.1 Methylene chloride 50 ND<22.8 ND<31.2 ND<21.3 ND<22.4 ND<25.8 ND -<20.7 ND<27.9 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 6002 NDe9A0 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 N.D<11.1 Tetrachloroethene 1,300 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 680 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8,98 NI3<10.3 ND -,&29 ND<11.1 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 6,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8,50 ND<8,98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Trichloroethene 470 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8,29 ND<11.1 Trichlorofluormethane 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10,3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Vinyl Chloride :F=N D<9. I 0 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 N13<1.0.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Notes; 1 -Standards are for soils according 10 NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 375, Unrasfricted Use Sod Cleanup Dbjecffves, unless otherwise indicated; 2 - Standard for soils according to NYSDEC TAGM 04D4e, Recommended Soil Cleanup Objectives; (Standards not yet established for listed compound under Part 375); All concentrations are in ug7xg (ppb) unless otherwise Indicated; Boldface type designates those oompounds.detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards; _ . NE = No standard established. Table 1 (cont). Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Geoprobe and Mand Auger Soil Samples; USEPA Method 8260; collected January 18, 2007;152-164 Old Past Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW60010 Constituent NYSDECLimit' Sample Identification GB -1 (0-121 GB -2 (0-12") GB -3 (0=12") GB -3 G8-4 GB -5 (12-48") (0-12-) (0-17") GB -6 (0-121 Benzene 60 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND498 ND<10.3 ND -58.29 ND -511.1 Chlorobenzene 1,100 ND410 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND -510.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Ethylbenzene 1,000 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8,98 ND<10.3 ND<6.29 ND<11.1 Toluene 700 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<829 ND<11.1 m/p-Xylene 2,600 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 o -Xylene 2,600 ND<9A0 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Styrene 10,0002 ND<22.8 ND<31.2 ND<21.3 ND<22,4 ND<25.8 ND<20.7 ND<27.9 1 -2 -Dichlorobenzene. 1,100 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND -58.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11,1 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 2,400 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8,50 ND<8.98 ND<10,3 ND<8.29 ND<11,1 1 -4 -Dichlorobenzene 1,800 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 N0<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Acetone 50 ND<45.5 ND<62.5 ND<42,5 ND<44,9 ND<51.6 ND<41.4 ND<55.7 2-Butanone 3002 ND<45.5 ND<62.5 ND<42.5 ND<44.9 ND<51.6 ND<41.4 ND<55.7 2-Hexanone 10,0002 ND<22.8 ND<31.2 Nb<21.3 ND<22.4 ND<25.8 ND<20.7 ND<27.9 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1,0001 ND<22.8 ND<31.2 ND<21.3 ND<22.4 ND<25.8 ND<20.7 ND<27.9 Carbon disulfide 2,7002 ND<22.8 ND<31.2 ND<21.3 ' ND<22,4 ND<25.8 ND<20.7 ND<27,9 Vinyl acetate 10,0002 N6<22.8 ND<31,2 ND<21.3 ND<22,4 ND<25.8 ND<20.7 ND<27.9 n-Butylbenzene 12,000 'ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10,3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 sec-Butylbenzene 11,000 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 tert-Butylbenzene 5,900 ND<9.10 ND<12,5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 n-propylbenzene 3,900 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Isop ropylbenzene 10,0002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND -58,29 ND<11A p-Isopropyltoluene 10,0.002 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Naphthalene 13,0002 ND<22.8 ND<31.2 ND<21.3 ND<22.4 Nb<25.8 ND<20.7 ND<27.9 1, 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene 3,600 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 1, 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene 8,400 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8,50 ND<8,98 ND<10.3 ND<6.29 ND<11.1 Methyl tert-butyl ether 930 ND<9.10 ND<12.5 ND<8.50 ND<8.98 ND<10.3 ND<8.29 ND<11.1 Notes; j 1 - Standards we for soils according to NYSDEC SNYCRR Part 375, Unrestricted Use SoN Cleanup ObfimOves, "ass otherwise Indicated; 1 2 - Standard for soils acoording to NYSDEC TAGM #4D46. Recommended Sol! Cleanup Objeoliv es; (Standards not yet established for listed compound under Part 375); All oormntrabons are In ugft (ppb) unless otherwise Indicated; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards; . NE = No standard established. - Table 1 (cont). Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Geoprobe and Hand Auger Soil Samples; USEPA Method 8260; collected January 18, 2007; 152-161 Old Post �.. Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Constituent NYSDECLimit' Sample Identification GB -7 (0-18") GB -8 HA -1 (0-12") HA -2 (0-61 HA -3 (0-61.) HA -4 (0-6") Bromodichloromethane 10,0002 N.D<6,22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<i 1.1 ND<13.4 Bromomethane 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15,0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Bromoform 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Carbon tetrachloride 760 ND -<8.22 ND<8.74 ND -04-7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Chloroethane 1,9002 ND<8.22 Nb<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11A ND03.4 Chloromethane 10,0002 ND<8,22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11,i ND<13.4 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8,74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<i 1.1 ND<i 3.4 Chloroform 370 ND<8,22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 N13<13A Dibromochloromethane NE ND<8.22 ND<8:74 NDe14.7 ND -<16,0 ND<11A ND<13A 1,1-Dichloroethane 270 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 1,2-Dichloroethane 20 N0<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<1.1.1 l`!Q<13.4 1,1-Dichloroethene 330 ND<8.22 ND -<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 cis -1, 2-Dichloroethene 250 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14,7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 190 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13A 1,2-Dichloropropane 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14,7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.i 'ND<13.4 Methylene chloride 50 ND<20.6 ND<21.8 ND<36.7 ND<37.6 ND<27.7 ND<33.4 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 6002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14,7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13A Tetrachloroethene 1,300 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<1IA ND<13.4. 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 680 ND<8,22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 6,0002 NQ<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Trichloroethene 470 ND<8.22. ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15,0 ND<1f.1 ND<13A Trichlorofluotmethane 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8,74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Vinyl Chloride 20 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14,7 ND<15,0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Notes: 1- Standards are for lolls according to NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 376, Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objedims, unless olherwise indicated; 2 - Standard for soils according to NYSDEC TAGM #4046, Recommended W Cleanup Objectives; (Standards hot yet established for Ssted compound under Part 375); All concentrations are iri ugft (ppb) unless otherwise indicated; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards; NE = No standard established. `fit Table 1 (cont). Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Geoprohe and Hand Auger Soil Samples; USEPA Method 8260; collected January 18, 2007; 152-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York, Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Constituent NYSDEC Sample Identification Limit GB -7 GB -8 (0-18.) i0-12") HA -1 (0-6") HA -2 HA -3 (0-6") (MI) HA -0 (0-6") Benzene 60 ND<8.22, ND<8,74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Chlorobenzene 1,100 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Ethylbenzene 1,000 ND<8.22 ND -e8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Toluene 700 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 mlp-Xylene 2,600 ND<8.22 NO -<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 N0<1 i.1 ND<13.4 o -Xylene 2,600 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Styrene 10,000 ND<20.6 ND<21.8 ND<36.7 ND<37.6 ND<27.7 ND<33A 1 -2 -Dichlorobenzene 1,100 ND<8,22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 2,400 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 1 -4 -Dichlorobenzene 1,800 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND04.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Acetone 50 ND<41.1 ND<43.7 ND<73.5 ND<75.1 ND<65.4 ND<66.9 2-Butanone 3002 ND<41.1 ND<43.7 ND<73.5 ND<75.1 N4<55.4 ND<66.9 2-Hexanone 10,0002 ND<20.6 ND<21.8 ND<36,7 ND<37.6 ND<27.7 ND<33.4 4-Methyl-2-pentanorle 1,0002 ND<20.6 ND<21.8 ND<36.7 ND<37.6 ND<27.7 ND<33.4 Carbon disulfide 2,7002 ND<20.6 ND<21.8 ND<36.7 ND<37,6 ND<27.7 ND<33.4 Vinyl acetate 10,0002 ND<20.6 ND<21:8 ND<36.7 ND<37.6 Np<27.7 ND<33A n-Butylbenzene 12;000 ND<8.22 ND<834 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 sec-Butylbenzene 11,000 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15:0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 tent-Butylbenzene 5,900 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11A ND<13.4 n-propylbenzene 3,900 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 lsopropylbenzene 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8,74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 p-Isopropyltoiuene 10,0002 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15,0 ND<11.1 ND<13.4 Naphthalene 13,0002 ND<20.6 ND<21.8 ND<36.7 ND<37.6 ND<27.7 ND<33.4 1, 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene 3,600 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<11.1 ND<M4 1, 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene, 8,400 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 N13<11.1 ND<13.4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 930 ND<8.22 ND<8.74 ND<14.7 ND<15.0 ND<111 ND<13.4 7 Notes: { 1 -- Standards are for soils according to NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 375, Unrestricted Use Sail Cleanup Objectives, unless otherwise ind salad; 2 - Standard for soils according to NYSDEC TAGM #4046, Recommended Soil Geanup Objectives; (Standards not yet established for listed compound under Part 375); All concentrations are in ug/kg (ppb) unless otherwise Indicated; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards; NE = No standard established, Table 2. Sethi-Vo.latiie Organic Compounds (SVOCs) in Soil Samples; USEPA Method 8270; collected January 18, 2007; 152-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Constituent NYSDEC Urnit' Sample Identification GB -1 (0-12") GB -2 (0-12") GB -3 (0-12"} GB -3 (12-48") GB -4 GB -5 GB -6 (0-12") (0-171 (0-12") Acenaphthene 20,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 ND<358 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Acenapthylene 100,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 374 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Anthracene 100,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 1,110 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Benzo (a) anthracene 1,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 1,690 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Benzo (a) pyrene 1,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 1,330 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Benzo (b) fluoranthene 1,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 1,150 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 100,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 582 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 Na<363 Benzo (k) fluoranthene 800 ND5357 ND<2,090 1,470 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Chrysene 1,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 2,140 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363. Dibenz (a,h) arithracene 330 ND<357 ND<2,090 ND<358 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Fluoranthene 100,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 5,910 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Fluorene. 30;000 ND<357 ND<2,090 ND<358 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 lndeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene 500 ND<357 ND<2,090 636 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Naphthalene 12,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 580 ND<327 ND<365" ND<378 ND<363 Phenanthrene 100,000 ND<357 ND<2,090 6,170 ND<327 ND<365 N,D<378 ND<363 Pyrene 1oo,0o0 ND -c:357 ND<2,090 4,570 ND<327 ND<365 ND<378 ND<363 Total SVOCs -- 0 0 27,712 00 q 0 Notes: All concentrations are In ugtkg; 1 - Standards are for soils according NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 375, Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives, ND = Not detected, detection limit listed; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC Limit. b Table 2 (cant), Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) its Soil Samples; USEPA Method 8270; collected January 18, 2007; 152-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Constituent NYSDEC Limit' Sample Identification G13-7 (0-18') GB -8 (0-12') HA -1 (0-61) HA -2 (0-6") HA -3 HA -4 (0-6") (0-61 Acenaphthene. 20,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND -5338 ND<471 Acenapthylene 100,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Anthracene 100,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Benzo (a) anthracene 1,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Benzo (a) pyrene 1,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Benzo (b) fluoranthene 1,000 ND<342 ND -5372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Benzo (g,h,i) p'erylene 100,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Benzo (k) fluorarnthene 800 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 . ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Chrysene 1,000. ND<342 ND <372 ND<454 ND<459 ND -5338 ND<471 Dibenz (a,h) anthracene 330 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<336 ND<471 Fluoranthene 100,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND -5338 ND.Wl Fluorene 30,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Jndeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene 500 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Naphthalene 12,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Phenanthrene 100,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND<459 ND<338 ND<471 Pyrene 100,000 ND<342 ND<372 ND<454 ND -5459 ND<338 ND<471 Total SVOCs - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notes: - - -- - - - - All concentrations are in ug/kg;_ 1 -Standards are for soils according NYSDEC 6NYCRR Part 375, Unrestrlcted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives; ND = Not detected, detection limit Ilsted; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC Limit. N Table 3. 8 RCRA Metals in Geoprobe Soil Samples; USEPA Method 6010; collected January 18, 2007; 162-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Chemical NYSDEC GB -2 GB -3 T7 GB -3 GB -6 GB -8 Constituent Limit' (0-12') (0-12") (12-48') (0-12") (D 121 Arsenic 13 13.8 7,36 7.90 7.51 9.43 Bariurn 350 434 92.6 49.8 320 169 Cadmium 2.5 14.2 ND<0.593 ND<0.551 ND<0.733 1.42 chromium 30 23.1 17.8 21.8 19.8 25.5 Lead 63 427 383 11.6 67.8 194 Mercury 0.18 0.7370 0.0605 0.0336 0.0435 0.0708 Selenium 3.9 ND<0.646 ND<0.593 ND<0.551 ND<0.733 ND<0.596 Silver 2 3.06 ND<1.i8 ND<1.10 ND<i.46 ND<1.19 Notes: 1 — Standards are for soils according to NYS DEC 6NYCRR Part 375, Unrestricted Use Soil Cleanup Objectives, All concentrations are in mg/kg (ppm) unless otherwise indicated; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYS DEC standards; NE = No standard established. N Table 4. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Surface'Water Samples; USEPA Method 8260; collected January 18, 2007-1152-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Constituent NYSDEC PWA PW -2 Limit Bromodichloromethane 50 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Bromomethane 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Bromoform 50 ND<2.00 ND<2-00 Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Chloroethane 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Chloromethane 5 ND<2.00 ND<2-00 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 50 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Chloroform 7 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Dibromochloromethane 50 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 1,1-Dich loroelhane 5 N D<2.00 ND<2.00 1,2-Dichloroethane 0,6 ND<2.00 ND -<2.00 1,1-Dichloroethene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 cis -1, 2-Dichloroethene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 ND<2.00 . ND<2.00 1,2-Dichloropropane 1 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene 5 ND<2,00 ND<2.00 Methylene chloride 5 ND<5.00 ND<5.00 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Tetrachloroethene 5 ND<2,00 ND<2.00 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5 ND<2,00 ND<2.00 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 1 ND<2.00 ND<2,00 Trichloroethene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Trichlorofluoromethane 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Vinyl Chloride 2 ND<2,00 ND<2.00 Noles'. 1 - Standards are for Class GA groundwater according to 61 YCRR Part 700-705, All concentrations are in uglL unless otherwise indicated. ND=Not detected, detection limit listed. Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standard. E = Exceeded calibration range of Instrumentation. Table 4 (cont). Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Surface Water Samples; USEPA Method 8260; collected January 18, 20071152-164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File.#AW070010 Constituent NYSDEC Limit pW-1 PW -2 110 Benzene 0.7 ND<0.700 ND<0.700 Chlorobenzene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.D0 Ethylbenze ne 5 ND<2. G0 ND<2.00 Toluene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 rtVp-Xylene 5 N D<2.00 N D <2.00. o -Xylene 5 ND<2.00 ND<200 Styrene 5 ND<5.00 ND<5.00 Acetone 50 ND<10.00 ND<10.00 Vinyl acetate 50 ND<5.00 ND<5.00 2-Butanone . 50 ND<10.00 ND<10.00 4 -Methyl -2 -pe nta none 50 N D<5.00 N D <5.00 2-Hexanone 50 ND<5.00 ND<5.00 Carbon disulfide 50 Nb<5.00 ND<5.00 Methyl tert-butyl ether 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Iso.propylbenzene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 n-propylbenzene 5 ND' -e2.00 ND<2.00 1, 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 tent-Butylbenzene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 1, 2, 4-Trimethylbenzene 5 ND<2.W . ND<2.00 sec-Butylbenzene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 p-Isopropyltoluene 5 ND -<2,00 ND<2.00 n-Butylbenzene 5 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Naphthalene 10 ND<5.00 ND<5.00 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 3 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 .1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 3 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 3 ND<2.00 ND<2.00 Total VOCs - ND ND Notes: 1 - Standards are for Class GA ground+vater according to 6NYCRR Part 700-705, All concentrations are in uW1 unless otherwise indicated. ND=Not detected, detection limit listed. Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standard E = Exceeded calibration range of Instrumentation. Table 5. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Supply Well Samples; USEPA Method 524.2; collected February 7, 2007; 158 and 164 Old Post Road, Wappinger, New York; i Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Chemical Constituent NYSDEC Limit' Sample Identification SW -158 SW -164 „E Bromochloromethane 50 ND< 1,0 ND< 1.0 Bromomethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND< 1.0 ND< 1.0 " Chloroethane 5 ND< 1.0. ND< 1.0 Chloromethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND<'0.5 1,2-Dibromomethane 5 ND< 0,5 ND< 0.5 Dibromomethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 0.04 ND< 1.0 ND< 1.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,1-Dichloroethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1;2-Dichloroethane 0.6 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,1-Dichlor6ethene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 trans-1,2-Dichloraethene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1.2-Dichloropropane 1 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,3-Dichloropropane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 2,2-Dichloropropane. 5 ND< 0.5 NO< 0.5 1,1-Dichloropropene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.4 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.4 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Methylene chloride 5 No< 1.0 ND< 1.0 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 5 NO< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 5 ND< 0.5 NO< 0.5 Tetrachloroethene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0-5 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0-5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Notes: 1 , Standards are for groundwater ac oDrding fo 6NYCRR Part 700-705, Class GA Groundwater Standards; All conbantrations are in ag/L; ND=Not detected aboVdthe method detection llmA listed; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at ooncentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. 8 =Analyte also detedad in Method Blank Table 5.(cont'd) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Supply Well Samples; USFPA Method 524.2; collected February 7, 2007; 158 and 164 Old Post Road, t. Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Chemical Constituent NYSDEC Limit' Sample Identittcation SW -158 SW -164 rem ymsylw NOW Trichloroethene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.004 ND< 0,5 ND< 0.5 Vinyl Chloride 2 ND< 0.5 ND< 6.5 Benzene 1 ND< 0.5 ND<.0,5 Bromobenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 n-Butylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 sec-Butylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 tert-Butylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Chlorobenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 2-Chlorotoluene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 4-Chlorotoluene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 3 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1',3 -Dichlorobenzene 3 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 3 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Ethylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 lsopropylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 4-Isopropyltoluene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Naphthalene 10 ND< 1.0 ND< 1.0 n-Propylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Styrene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Toluene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,2,3-TrIchlo robe nzene 5 ND< 1,0 ND< 1.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5 ND< 1.0 ND< 1.0 Notes: 1 -Standards are for groundwater according to 6NYCRR Pad 700-705, Class GA Groundwater Standards;; All concentrations are in ug7L; NO -Not detected above the method detection limit listeel; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. Table 5.(cont'd) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Supply Well Samples; USEPA Method 524.2; collected February 7, 2007; 158 and 164 Old Post Road, ( Wappinger, New York; Conrad Geoscience File #AW070010 Chemical Constituent NYSDEC Limit Sample Identification SW -158 SW -164 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Xylenes, total 10 ND< 0.5 ND< 0,5 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 10 ND< 2.0 ND< 2.0 Bromodichloromethane 50 ND< 0,5 ND< 0.5 Bromoform 50 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Chloroform 7 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Dibromochloromethane 50 ND< 0.5 ND< 0.5 Notes: 1 - Standards are for groundwater according to GNYCRR Par1700-705, Class GA Groundwater Standards; All concentrations are in 41--, NO=Not detected above the method detection limit listed; Boldface type designates those compounds detected at concentrations exceeding NYSDEC standards. PARADIGM 179 Lake Avenue Rochester New York 5$5-647-2530 FAX 585-647-3311 ENVIRONIMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Volatile Laboratory Analysis Report RESULTS (ugll) i For Drinking Water Benzene Client: Conrad Geoscience Lab Project No.: 07-0491 Bromobenzene Lab Sample No.: 2263 Client Job Site: Adams - Wappinger n-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 Chloroethane Sample Type: Drinking Water Client Job No.: AW07.0010 Date Sampled: 02/07/07 Field Location: SWA58 Date Received: 02/08/07 .ND<0.5 Date Analyzed: 02/13107 VOLATILE HALOCARSONS RESULTS . (ug/1) VOLATILE AROMATICS RESULTS (ugll) Bromochlorom ethane Nb<1.0 Benzene ND<0,5 Bromomethane ND<0.5 Bromobenzene ND<0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND<1,0 n-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 Chloroethane ND<1.0 sec-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 Chloromethane ND<0,5 tert-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 1,2-Dibromomethane .ND<0.5 Chiorobenzene ND<0.5 . Dibrornomethane' ND<0.5 2-Chlorotoluene N0<0,5 12-Dibromo-3-Chlo.ropropane ND<1.0 4-Chlorotoluene ND -<0,5 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND<0.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND<0,5 1,1-Dichloroethane ND<0.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND<0.5 1,2- bichloroethane ND<0.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND<0.5 1,1-Dichtoroethene ND<0.5 Ethyl Benzene ND<0.5 cis- 1,2-Dichlotoethene ND<0;5 Hexachiorobutadiena ND<0.5- trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND<0.5 Isopropylbenzene ND<0.5 trans-1,4-Dichlaro-2-butene ND<0.5 4-Isopropyttoluene ND<0.5 11,2 - Dichloropropane ND<0.5 Naphthalene ND<1.0 1,3-Dichloropropane ND<0.5 n-Propylbenzene ND<0.5 2,2-Dichloropropane ND<0,5 styrene ND<0.5 1,1- Dichloropropene ND<0.5 Toluene ND<0,5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND<0.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND<0,5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND<0.5 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND<0.5 S Methylene Chloride NO<1.0' . 1,2,44rlmethylbenzerie ND<1.0 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane Nb<0.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND<0.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND<0.5 Xylenes, Total ND<0.5 Tetra chloroethene ND<0,5 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether ND<2.0 S 1,1.1-Trichloroelhane ND<0.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane Nb<0.5 Trihalornetha:nes Trichloroethene ND<0.5 Bromodichloromethane ND<0,5 Trichlorofluoromethane ND<0.5 S Bromoform ND<0,5 1, 2,3-Trichloropropane N.D<0.5 Chloroform Nb<0.5 Vinyl Chloride ND<0,5 Dibromochloromethane ND<0.5 EPA Method 524.2 Comments: ND denotes Non -Detected. S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits, ' Approved By Technical director: 4 Bru Hoogesteger . NY5 kLAY Ne.: IU/U9 Chain of Custody provides additional sample information. File 1D: CON RAD524.2DW07-0491.xls �ARADIGM�179 Lake Avenue Rochester New York 585-647.2530 FAX 585447-3311 ENVIRONMENYAL SERVICES, INC. Volatile Laboratory Analysis Repo For Drinking Water Client: Conrad Geoscience Lab Project No,: 07-0491 Bromochloromethane ND<1.o Lab Sample No.: 2262 Client Job Site: Adams - Wappinger Bromobenzene ND<0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND<1.0 Sample Type:, Drinking Water Client Job No.: AW070010 Date Sampled: 02/47/07 Field Location: SW -164 Date Received: .02/08/07 1,2-Dibromomethane ND<0.5 Date Analyzed: 02/13/07 VOLATILE HALOCARBONS RESULTS (ugll) VOLATILE AROMATICS RESULTS (ug11) Bromochloromethane ND<1.o BenzeneND<0.5 Bromome.thane ND<0.5 Bromobenzene ND<0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND<1.0 n-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 .Chloroethane NO<1.0 . sec-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 Chloromethane ND<0.5 tert-Butylbenzene ND<0.5 1,2-Dibromomethane ND<0.5 Chlorobenzene ND<0,5 Dibromomethane ND<0.5 2-Chlorotoluene ND<0.5 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chlorbpropane ND<1.0 4-Chlorotoluene ND<0,5 Dichlorodifluoromethane. ND<0.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND<0.5 1,1-Dichloroeihane ND<0.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND<0.5 1.2- Dichloroethane ND<0,5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND<0:5 1,1-Dichloroethene ND<0,5 Ethyl Benzene ND<0.5 cis- 1,2-Dichloroothene ND<0.5 Hexachlorobutadlene ND<0.5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND<0.5 Isgpropylbenzene ND<0.5 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND<0.5 4-Isopropyltaluene N0<0.5 1,2 - Dichloropropane ND<0.5 Naphthalene ND<1.0 1,3-01chloropropane ND<0.5 n-Propy#benzene ND<0.5 2,2-Dichloropropane ND<0.5 styrene ND<0.5 1,1- Diichloropropene ND<0.5 Toluene NO<0.5 cls-1,3-Dichtoropropene ND<0.5 1,2,3-Trlchlorobenzene ND<0.5 trans-1.3-0ichloropropene ND<0.5 1,2,4-Trlchlorobenzene ND<0.5 S Methylene Chloride ND<1.0 1,2,4-Trimethobenzene ND<1-0 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND<0.5 1.3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND<0.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND<0.5 Xylenes, Total ND<0.5 Tetrachloroethene ND<0,5 Methyl -t -Butyl Ether ND<2.0 S 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND<0,5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND<0.5 Trihalomethanes Trichloroethene ND<0.5 8romodichloromethane ND<0.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ND<0.5 S Bromoform ND<0.5 1.2,3-Trlchloropropane ND<0.5 Chloroform ND<0.5 Vinyl Chloride ND<0,5 Dibromochloromethane ND<0,5 Comments: ND denotes Non -Detected, S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits. Approved By Technical Director: Bruc Hoogesteger Chain of Custody provides additional sample information. NYS FLAP No.: 10709 File ID: CON RAD524.217WD7-0491.xls A LL m®■■■■■■■■ ©©■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ',iia ,� .c mmmmmmmmm ;s ■m■■m■■■■■,_ . ■M■■■■■■■■ . ■■■■■■■■■■ i .� 5n ■■■■■■■■■■ ■M■■■■■■■■; k OMME■■■■■■ s G� ©eeee�■eee� n r x { s tri ®oy. PARADIGM 179 Lake Avenue, Rochester, NY 14608 (585) 647-2530 FAX (585).647-3311 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Client: Client Job Site Client Job No,: Field Location: Field ID No.: Comments: Conrad Geoscience CorpLab Project No.: 07-0318 (mg/kg) Lab Sample No.: 1634 Tinkelman-Wapptnger 434 D,M Cadmium 01/2312007 Sample Type: Soil TW070010 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 GB -2 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 NIA Date Received: 01119/2007 Laboratory Report for Solid Waste Analysis Parameter Date AnalyzedT AnalyticalResult T_ (mg/kg) Barium 01/23/2007 Method 434 D,M Arsenic 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 13,6 D Barium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 434 D,M Cadmium 01/2312007 EPA 6010 14.2 D,M lhromium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 23.1 D Lead 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 427 D -Mercury 01/23/2007 EPA 7471 0.7370 M Selenium 01123/2007. EPA 6010 <0,646 Silver 0.112312007 EPA 6010 3.06 D ELAP ID No.:10958 Approved By: Bruce Hoogesteger, Technical Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirety, Chain of Custody provides additional sample information, >ncluding compliance with sample condition requirements upon receipt. File ID:070318,XLS PARADIGM ENYIRUNMERTA! SERVICES. �ES. INC. R 179 Lake Avenue Rochester NY 14608 585 647-.2530 FAX 565 647-3311 YIC Client: Client Job Site Client Job No.: Field Location; Field ID No.: Comments: Conrad Geoscience Corp Lab Project No.: 07-0318 Result (mgikg) Lab Sample No.: 1633 Tinkelman-Wappinger 7.36 Barium. 01/23/2007 Sample Type:. Soil TW070010 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 CB -3 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01118(2007 NIA Date Deceived: 01/19/2007 Laboratory Report for Solid Waste Analysis Parameter Date Analyzed Analytical Method Result (mgikg) Arsenic 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 7.36 Barium. 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 92,6 Cadmium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 e0.593 Chromium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 17.8 Lead 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 383 Mercury 01/2M007 EPA 7971 0.0605, Selenium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 <0,593 Silver 01123/2007 EPA 6010 H -AF lu No.:1U956 Approved By: Bruce Hoogesteger, Technical Director This report is part of a multlpage document and should only be evaluated in its entirety. Chain of Custody provides additional sample information, including comptiance with sample condition requirements upon receipt. File U07031 B.XLS PARADIGM 179 Lake Avenue'Rochester, NY 14608 (585)'647-2530 FAX {585 64] 7.3311 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, Client: Client Job Site Client Job No.: Field Location: Field ID No.: Conrad Geoscience Lab Project No.: 07-0318R Result (mg/kg) Lab Sample No.: 1636R Tinkelman-Wappinger 7.90 Barium 02/01/2007 Sample Type: Soif TW070010 02101/2007 EPA 6010 GB -3 (14) Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 NIA Date Received, 01/29/2007 Laboratory Report for Solid Waste Analysis parameter Date Analyzed Analytical Method Result (mg/kg) Arsenic 0210112007 EPA 6010 7.90 Barium 02/01/2007 EPA 6010 49.8 Cadmium 02101/2007 EPA 6010 <0.5�1 Chromium 02/09/2007 EPA 6010 21.8 Lead 02/0112007 EPA 6010 11,6 Mercury 02/01/2007 FPA 7471 0.0336 Selenium 02/01/2007 EPA 6010 <0.551 Silver 02/01/2007 EPA 6010 <1.10 FLAP ID No.:10958 Comments: Approved By: Bruce Hoo Steger, Technical Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in Its entirety. Chain of Custody provides additional sample Information, Including compliance with sample condition requirements upon receipt, File ID:070318R.XLS PARADIGM 179 Lake Avenue Rochester NY 14608 585 647-2530 FAX 585 647-3311 ENMONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, Client: Client Job Site: Client Job No.: Field Location, Field ID No.: Conrad Geoscience CorpLab Project No.: 07-0318 Result (mglkg) Lab Sample No.: 1631. Tinkelman-Wappinger 120 Cadmium 01/23/2007 Sample Type: Soil TW070010 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 GB -6 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 . NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Laboratory Report for Solid Waste Analysis Parameter Date Analyzed Analytical Result (mglkg) Barium 01/2312007 Method 120 Arsenic 01/2312007 EPA 6010 7.51 Barium 01/2312007 EPA 6010 120 Cadmium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 <0.733 Chromium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 19.8 Lead 01/23!2007 EPA 6010 57.8 Mercury 01/23/2007 EPA 7471 0,0435 Selenium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 <0.733 Silver 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 X1.46 ELAP ID No.: 10958 Comments: Approved By: Bruce Hoogesteger, Technical Director ..y This report is part of a multipage document and should onty be evaluated in its entirety, Chain of Custody provides additional sample information, including compliance wRh sample condition requirements upon receipt. File ID,070318,XLS PARADIGM 179 Lake Avenue Rochester NY 14608 586 647-2530 FAX 5$5 647-3311 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. Client: Client Job Site, Client Job No.: Field Location: Field ID No.: Comments: Conrad Geoscience Corp Tinkelrnan-Wappinger TW070010 GB -8 (0-12") NIA Lab Project No.: 07-0318 Lab Sample No.: 1626 Sample Type: Soil Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received* 01/19/2007 Laboratory Report for Solid Waste Analysis Parameter Date Analyzed Analytical Method Result m !ic { 5 g) Arsenic 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 9.43 Barium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 169 Cadmium 0112312007. EPA 6010 1.42 Chromium 01123/2007 EPA 6010 25.5 Lead 0112312007 EPA 6010 194 Mercury 01!2312007 EPA 7471 0.0780 Selenium 01/23/2007 EPA 6010 <0,596 Silver 01123!2007 EPA 6010 <1.19 tLAY Iu IV V.: Iuv uo Approved By: Bruce Hoogesteger, Technical Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirely. Chain of Custody provides additlorW sample information, Including compliance with sample condition requiremonts upon receipt. File ID:070318.XL5 F!ELPARADIGM EHYIROMMEWAL SERVICES, INC, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 -,2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1622 Client Job Number:' TW070010 Field Location: HA -1 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Sall . Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Base / Neutrals Results In ug g Acenaphthene ND< 454 Acenaphthylene ND< 454 Anthracene ND< 454 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 454 Benzo (a)' pyrene ND< 454 Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND< 454 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND< 454 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND< 454 Chrysene ' ND< 454 D'Ibenz (a,h) anthracene ND< 454 Fluorarlthene ND< 454 Fluorene ND< 454 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene No< 454 Naphthalene ND< 454 Phenanthrene ND< 454 Pyrene ND< 45.4 ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data Fife: 533142.0 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram t Signature: Bruce Ho estege ethnical Director This report rs past of a multiipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirety, Chain of Custody provides additional information, including compliance Wlh sample condillon requirements upon recelpl. 070318Dt.XLS PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICEs, Ikt:. 179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for SoilslSolids/Sludges Client; Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number; 07-0318 Lab Sample Number; 1623 Client Job Number: TVV070010 Field Location: HA -2 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number. NIA Date Received: 01119/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Base/ Neutrals Results In ug. 7 Kq Acenaphthene ND< 459 -Acenaphthylene ND<.459 Anthracene NO< 459 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 459 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 4.59 Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND< 459 Benzo (g,h,l) perylene ND< 459 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND< 459 Chrysene ND< 459 Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND< 459 Fluoranthene ND< 459 Fluorene ND< 459 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene ND< 459 Naphthalene Np< 459 Phenanthrene N.D< 459 Pyrene ND< 459 ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File: S33143,D Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug 1 Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hoogesteg r. T nieal Director This repos Is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated Vn Its entirely. Chain or Custody provides additional infonnatlon, inclUdtng compliance with sample condllion requirements upon recefpl, _ 6703181)2.xL5 PARADIGM EHYkROIIMtfi7At SERYIC€S. 111c: 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647— 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site Client Job Number: Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type: Tinkelman - Wappinger TW 070010 HA -3 NIA Soil Hcenapntnene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,l) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene . Fluorene . Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene EtAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1624 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/23/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 ND< 338 Method: EPA 8270C Data File: S33144.D Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: Tec cal Director This report is part of a multipege document and should only M evalualed In Its entirely. Chain of custody provides aduidonal information, Including cwmpliance with sample condition requirements upon recerpl, 070S18OULS FiF-JPARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC, 179 take Avenue Rochester, New York.14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Sit%: Tinkelman - Wappinger Client Job Number: TW070010 Field Location: HA -4 Field ID Number: N/A Sample type: Soil Lab Protect Number; 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1625 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received; 01119/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/23/2007 Date Reissued: 011301200.7 Base 1 Neutrals Results in ug I Kg Acenaphthene D< 471 Acenaphthylene ND< 471 Anthracene ND< 471 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 471 Benzo (a) pyrene NO< 471 Benzo (b) fluoranthene NLX 471 Benzo (g,h,l) perylene ND< 471 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND< 471 Chrysene ND< 471 Uibenz (a,h) anthracene ND< 471 Fluoranihene ND< 471 Fluorene Nps 471 Indeno (1,2,,3 -cd) pyrene ND< 471 Naphthalene ND< 471 Phenanthrene No< 471 Pyrene ND< 471 Ei_AP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File, S33145.0 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram I Signature: Bruce Hoogeste.ger: Techn l Director Th* repod is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in Its. entirely. Chain of Cuslody provides addiflonat information, Including compliance with sample condition requirements upon receipt. 0703`1804 ALS FLFL-PARADIGM I:IIY BONMENTAL SeRllcts, Mc. 179 take Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client, Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site; Client Job Number: Field Location: Fleid ID Number - Sample Type: Tinkelman - Wappinger. TW 070010 GB -1 (0-12") NIA Sail Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,l) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene Lab Project dumber: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1635 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/23/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 ELAP Number 10958 MHthod' EPA A27nC Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug 1 Kg = microgram per Kilogram ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 NDS 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 ND< 357 rlafa Rif. S.33153-1) ( Signature: l Bruce Hoogesteger: Te ni Director This report is pari of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirety. Chain of Cus(ody provides additional information, Including comptlance W ih sample condition reciWements upon receipt. - 070311SE3.XL5 owiPARADIGM DWROM MEHTht SERVIEES, t9Q. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analvsis Resort for Soils/Solids/Sludoes Client: Conrad Geoscience NU< ;e.uw Acenaphthylene Client Job Site: Tlnkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 No< 2,090 Benzo (a) pyrene Lab Sample Number: 1634 Client Job Number: TW070010 ND< 2,090 Benzo (k) fluoranthene Field Locations: GB -2 (0-12") Date Sampled: 1/1812007 Field ID 'Number: N/A Daae Received: 1/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 1/2312007 No< 2,090 Phenanthrene Date Reissued: 1/30/2007 Hcenapninene NU< ;e.uw Acenaphthylene ND< 2,090. Anthracene No< 2,090 Benzo (a) anthracene No< 2,090 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 2,090 Benzo (b) fluoranthene No< 2,090 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND< 2,090 Benzo (k) fluoranthene No< 2,090 ,Chrysene ND< 2,090 Dibenz (a,h) anthracene No< 2,090 Fluoranthene NO< 2,090 Fluorene ND< 2,090 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene No< 2,090 Naphthalene No< 2,090 Phenanthrene ND< 2,090 Pyrene ND.< 2,090 ELAN' Numoer 1x958 Method. EPA 82700 Data File: 533152.0 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Detection limit elevated due to non -target compounds I` Signature: Bruce Hooge ger: ech i Director This report is part of a multlpage document and should only be evaluated In Its enllrety. Chain sr Cuslody proA des additional information, Including compliance with sample condition requirements upon receipt. 01031BE2 P�j M EMYtROM11iEAiA1 ssRvlci179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for SoilslSolids/Slud es Client: Conrad Geosclence Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Client Job Number: TW070010 Field Location: GS -3 (0-12") Field tp Number: NIA Sample Type: Soil Hcenapntnene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo, (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene ' Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,l) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz ON anthracene Fluot-anthene Fluorene Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene FLAP Number 10958 Comments; ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram.per Kilogram ( ' Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger.1120cal Director Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1633 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 0112312007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Method: EPA 8270C 374 1,110 1,690 1,330 1,150 582 1,470 2,140 ND< 358 • 5,910 ND< 358 636 580 6,170 4,570_ Data File: S33151,D This report is pari of a muitipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirely. Chain o1 Custody provides addit}onai Information, including Compliance Oth sample Condition requirements upon recelpl. - - 070318Ei.X S PARADIGM ERVIROMMENTAL SEAME3. W, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14508 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Ana! Lis Report for SoilslSolidslSlud es f Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Tinke#man - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0316 Lab Sample Number: 1636 Client Job Number; TW070010 Field Location: G6-3 (1-4') Date Sampled: 0111$12007 Field lD Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil bate Analyzed: 01/23/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Base 1 Neutrals Results In vg I Kg Acenaphthene ND< 327 Acenaphthylene ND< 327 Anthracene ND< 327 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 327 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 327 Benzo (b) fluoranthene NDS 327 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND< 327 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND< 327 Chrysene ND< 327 Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND< 327 Fluoranthene ND< 327 Fluorene ND< 327 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene ND< 327 Naphthalene ND< 327' Phenanthrene ND< 327 Pyrene NO< 327 EIRP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8270C Data File. 833154.0 Comments: ND denotes Non Defect ug ! Kg = microgram per Kilogram t Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger Tt`I'Dlrector This report is part of a mullipage document and should only be evaluated In its entirely. Chaln of Custody provides addNional Wormallon, Including compliance With sample condition requirements upon receipt, 0703i6E4.XLS FTI -PARADIGM ENVIRotrfllENTAL SERVICES, INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Tlnkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1632 Client ,lob Number: TW070010 Field Location: G13-4 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field 1D Number: NIA Date Received: 0'{!1912007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 0112312007. Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Base 1 Neutrals Results in ug K9 Acenaphthene ND< 365 Acenaphthylene ND< 365 Anthracene NO< 365 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 365 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 365 Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND< 365 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene NDS 365 Benzo (k) fluoranthene NO< 365 Chrysene NDS 365 Dlbenz (a,,h) anthracene NDS 365 Fluoranthene ' ND< 365 Fluorene ND< 365 lndeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene ND< 365 Naphthalene ND< 365 Phenanthrene ND< $65 Pyrene ND< 385 ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82700 Data File: S33150,0 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg W microgram per Kilogram 4 Signature:. Bruce Hoogestegi§r Technlc hector fits repos is pari of a multipage, document and should only be evaluated in its entirely. Chain f Custody provides additional inrormation, including compliance With sample condition reclwemenis upon receipl.. 07031809.XLS F�FLPARADIGM ENPROMENTAL SERVICES. INS. 179 lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Slte: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab.Sample Number: 1628 Client Job Number; TW070010 . Field Location: GB -5 (0-17") Date Sampled: 01/1812007 f=ield ID Number: 'NIA Date Received: 011ig12007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/23/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Diberiz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno (1,2;3 -cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene GI A❑ Al—h—=1 nQrA KAoih—i- GDA A97r1C Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 NO< 378 ND< 376 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 ND< 378 nntn Fila• 48. D Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: T €ca€ Director Ttds report is part of a nvAllpage document and should only be evaluated in Its entkely. Chain of Custody provides addleonal information. Including compllance vft sample condillon requiraments upon receipt, - 07031007.XLS F4vLPARADIGM ENVI80MAIEWAL SERVICES, INC. 179 take Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (685) 647- 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Solis/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1631 Client Job Dumber: TWO7OO1O Field Location: GB -6 (0-12") Date Sampled: 0111B/20O7 Field ID Number, WA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Sall Date Analyzed: 01/23/2007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram i { Signature: Bruce Hoogeste er: Tech ' ai Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirely,.chain of Custody provides additional Information, Including compliance vAth sample condlllon requirements upon receipt. 070318DBAS Acenaphthylene NO< 363 Anthracene ND< 363 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 363 Benzo (a) pyrene ND< 363 Benzo (b) fluoranthene NO< 363 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene ND< 363 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND< 363 Chrysene ND< 363 . Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND< 363 Fluoranthene ND< 363 Fluorene ND< 363 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene NO< 363 Naphthalene ND< 363 Phenanthrene ND< 363 Pyrene ND< 363 FLAP Number 10958 Method: FPA 8270C Data File: S33149,D Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram i { Signature: Bruce Hoogeste er: Tech ' ai Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirely,.chain of Custody provides additional Information, Including compliance vAth sample condlllon requirements upon receipt. 070318DBAS Fiwl PARADIGM ERYI80MMENTAL URYKES, INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Sol-ids/Slud-ges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1627 Client Job Number: 1W070010 Field Location:. GB -7 (0-18") Date Sarnpled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/1912007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01!2312007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Base / Neutrals esu s In ug g Acenaphthene ND< 342 Acenaphthylene ND< 342 Anthracene ND< 342 Benzo (a) anthracene ND< 342 Benzo (a) pyrone ND< 342 Benzo (b) fluoranthene ND< 342 Benzo (g,h,i) peryiene ND< 342 Benzo (k) fluoranthene ND< 342 Chrysene ND< 342 Dibenz (a,h) anthracene ND< 342 Fluoranthene ND< 342 Fluorene ND< 342 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene ND< 342 Naphthalene ND< 342 Phenanthrene ND< 342 Pyrene ND< 342 FLAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82700 uata rsie: a3,si4i.t.) Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram! per Kilogram q, ( Signature: Bruce Hoogesl:69W c cal Director This report is part of a nwidpagc document and should only be evaluated in its entirely. Chain of Custody provides additional information, Including oomptlanoe with sample condtibn reQuirernenls upon receipt. - - 070M806.XI-S FiiivL PARADIGM liN9A10NA!£ATAL UUIC% IAC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 , (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Semi -Volatile: STARS Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Client Job Site: Client Job Number: Field Location: Field 10 Number: Sample Type- Tinkelman - Wappinger TW070010 GB -8 (0-12") NIA Soil Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benzo (a) anthracene Benzo (a) pyrene Benzo (b) fluoranthene Benzo (g,h,i) perylene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Chrysene Dibenz (a,h) anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene ftideno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene Naphthalene Phenanthrene ELAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1626 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/2312007 Date Reissued: 01/30/2007 Method: EPA 8270C ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 NO< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 ND< 372 Data File-, S33146.13 Signature: Bruce Hoogest ger: Wnical Director This report is part or a multipage documeni and should only be evaluated in its entirety. Chain of Custody provides additional information, including corTilanee with sample condition requirements upon receipt 07031$b5 M orLPARADIGM ENYtAQNMENTAL SSITYICE3, 1iic. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for SoilslSolids/Slud es Client; Conrad Geosclence Corp, Client Job Site: Client Job Number Field Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type: Tinkelman - Wappinger TW070010 HA -1 NIA Soil tsromoatcnloromemane ND< 14.7 Bromomethane ND< 14.7 Bromoform , ND< 14.7 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 14.7 Chloroethane ND< 14.7 Chloromethane ND< 14,7 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 14.7 Chloroform ND< 14.7 Dibromochloromethane ND< 14.7 1,1-Dichloroethane ND< 14,7 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 14.7 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 14,7 cis-1',2-Dichloroethene ND< 14.7 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 14,7 1,2-Dichioropropane ND< 14.7 cls- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 14.7 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene NO< 14.7 Methylene chloride ND< 36,7 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane NO< 14.7 Tetrachloroethene NDe 147 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 14,7 . 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane NO< 14.7 Trichloroethene ND< 14.7 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 14,7 Vinyl chloride ND< 14.7 ELAP Number 10958 Comments; ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram t Signature; Bruce lloogesteger. Tao n Irector Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Numbor: 1622 Date Sampled: 01/48/2007 Date Received: 01/49/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 i3enzene NU< 14./ Chlorobenzene ND< 14,7 Ethylbenzene ND< 14.7 Toluene ND< 14,7 m,p-Xylene ND< 14.7 o Xylene ND< 14.7 Styrene ND< 36.7 . 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene Np< 14.7 1,3LDichlorobenzerfe ND< 14.7 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 14.7 Ketones Results In ug I K Acetone ND< 73.5 2-Butanone ND< 73.5 2-Hexanone ND< 36,7 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 36.7 Miscellaneous Results in u K Carbon disulfide ND< 36,7 Vinyl acetate NO< 36.7 Method: EPA 82606 Lata t-ae: v4Z1uU.0 This report Is part of a mullipage document and should only be evatusied in Its entirety. Chain of Custody provides additional information, including compliance with sanpie condition requirements upon receipt, - 07011OVt.XLS PARADIGM FNYIB¢1ffRFlI1At st RYICt s, IMc, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, Naw York 14608 (585)647-2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Sollds/Stud es Additional STARS Compounds) Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Results in u 1 K n-Butylbenzene Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project dumber: 07-0318 ND< 14.7 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Lab Sample Number- 1622 Client Job Number: TW070010 n-Propylbenzene Field Location: HA -1 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number; NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type; Soil Date Analyzed: 01!2212007 , Aromatics Results .in u / Kg Aromatics Results in u 1 K n-Butylbenzene NL)< 14.7 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND< 14.7 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 14.7 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 14.7 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 14.7 n-Propylbenzene ND< 14.7 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 14.7 Methyl tett-butyl Ether ND< 14.7 p-isopropyltoluene NDS 14.7 Naphthalene ND< 36,7 FLAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Nor! Defect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Method: EPA 82606 Data File: V421FJ8.D 1 Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: Technical (rector This report is part of a mil0page document and should only be evaluated In Its entirely, Chain of Custody provides adMonal Information, Including comliance vAlh sample conation requirements upon receipt. 07M ErV 1.XlS PARADIICEs'M ENVIRUMMENIFAL 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New.York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Sails/SolidsfSlud_gss Client, Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Bromoform. ND< 15.0 ' Lab Sample Number: 1623 Client Job Number: TW070010 Chloromethane ND< 15.0 Field Location; HA -2 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 brornoolenloromemane NU< 15.0 Bromomethane ND< 15.0 Bromoform. ND< 15.0 ' Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 15.0 Chloroethane ND< 15.0 Chloromethane ND< 15.0 2-Chloro.ethyl vinyl Ether ND< 15.0 Chloroform ND< 15.0 Dibromochloromethane ND< 15.0 1,1-Dichloroethane ND< 15,0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 15.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 15.0 cis-1,2-Dichtotoethene ND< 15,0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 15.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND< 15.0 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 15,0 . trans-1,3-Dlchloropropene ND< 15.0 Methylene chloride ND< 37.8 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 15.0 Tetrachloroethene ND< 15.0 1,1;1 -Trichloroethane ND< 15.0 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane NO< 15.0 Trichloroethene ND< 15-0 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 15.0 Vinyl chloride ND< 15.0 ELAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram Aromatics Results in u 1 K Benzene ND< 15.0 Chlorobenzene ND< 15.0 Ethylbenzene ND< 15.0. Toluene ND< 15.0 m,p-Xylene ND< 15.0 o -Xylene ND< 15.0 Styrene ND< 37.6 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 15.0 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 15.0 1,4-Dlchlorobenzene ND< 15.0. Ketones Results in u 1 K Acetone Nb< 75.1 2-Butanone ND< 75.1 2-Hezanone ND< 37.6 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 37.6 Method: EPA 8260E Data File: V42169.D Signature: Bruce Hooges eger: Te&tlDeal Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirety. Ghaln of Custody provides additions! Information, including compliance with sample condlllon requirements upon receipt. - ' 07031BV2.XL5 Fe PARADIGM E14YIRD911ENTA1 SERIttGES. IRC. 173 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 . (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Additional STARS Compounds) Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 ND< 15.0 Lab Sample Number: 1523 Client Joh Number_ TW070010 ND< 15.0 Methyl tert-butyl Ether ND< 15.0 Field Location; HA -2 Date Sampled'. 01/1812007 Field 1D Number: NIA Date Received; 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 0112212007 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 15.0 1,35-Trimethylbenzene ND< 15.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 15.0 n-Propylbenzene ND< 15.0 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 15.0 Methyl tert-butyl Ether ND< 15.0 p-lsopropyltoluene ND< 15.0 Naphthalene . ND< 37.6 AM r...—, L— tnnco KA.9 'A. r~oe Roams Data File: V42169,D Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram s Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: Teti Director This repork Is part or a multipage document and should only be evaluated in.Its entirely, Chain of Custody provides additional informallon, including compliance with sample cmdiRan requirements upon receipt. - 0703tBV2.XLS PARADIGM ENYItt0MENTAt SEFYICEI, INC. 179 LaRe Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 . 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client' Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site Client Job Number.- Field umber:Field Location: Field fD Number: Sample Type: u ro modiohlo ro metha ne Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform D€bromochloromethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2=Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans- l,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958 Tinkelman - Wappinger TW070010 HA -3 NIA Soil ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 111 ND< 11.1 NO< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11,1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 27,7 ND< 11,1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 ND< 11.1 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature; Bruce Hoogesteger. Te6hrilcitIftilrector Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1624 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received; 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Aromatics Resells in u 1 K Benzene. ND< 11.1 Chlorobenzene ND< 11.1 Ethylbenzene ND< 11.1 Toluene ND< 11.1 m,p-Xylene ND< 11,1 o -Xylene ND< 11.1 Styrene . NO< 27.7 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.1 1,3-Dlchlorobehzene ND< 11.1 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.1 Ketones Results In u 1 K Acetone D< 55.4 2-Butanone ND< 55,4 2-Hexanone ND< 27.7 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 27.7 Miscellaneous Results in u 1 K Carbon disulfide ND< 27.7 Vinyl acetate ND< 27.7' Method: EPA 82608 pata File: MIND This report Is part of a mullipage document and should only be evacuated In Its entirety. Chain of Custody provides additional information, induding compliance with sample cor4tion regwrements upon receipt. 070318V3,AS ARADIGM ' EHY O"INENTAI SERVICES, INC, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for SoiislSolidslSlucl,ges (Additional STARS Compounds) Client, Conrad Gooscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Client Job Number: TW070010 Field Location: HA -3 Field ID Number: NIA Sample Type: Soil Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1624 Date Sampled: 0111$12007. Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 n-Butylbenzene ND< 11.1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzooe ND< 11.1 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 11.1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 11.1 ter(-Butylbenzene ND< 11.1 n-Propylbenzene ND< 11.1 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 11.1 Methyl tert-butyl Ether .ND< 11.1 p-Isopropyltoluene ND< 11,1 Naphthalene ND< 27,7 Et.AP Number 10958 Method: PPA A?ROR Data F#le: V42170.1) Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: 1"&cUp6ti Director This report is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated In Its entirety. Chain or Custody provides addilional Information, Including Wrnptiance Wth sample condition requirernenls upon receipt. 070313V3.XLS FwLPARADIGM EpVMIINMI NTAt. SEKVIW, W, 179 Lake /avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges 1 Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Bromoform ND< 1,3.4 Lab Sample Number: 1625 Client Job Number: TW070010 Chloromethane ND< .13.4 Field Location: HA -4 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 dromocuenioromemane NU< 16.4 Bromomethane ND< 13.4 Bromoform ND< 1,3.4 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 13.4 Chloroethane ND< 13.4 Chloromethane ND< .13.4 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 13.4 Chloroform ND< 13.4 Dibromochloromethane ND< 13.4 1,1-Dichloroethane ND< 13.4 1,2-Dichloroethane NO< 13.4 1,1-Dichloroothene NO< 13.4 .cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 13.4 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene NO< 13.4 1,2-Dichloropropane ND< 13.4 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 13.4 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 13.4 Methylene chloride ND< 33.4 1;1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 13.4 Tetrachloroethene ND< 13.4 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 13,4 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 13.4 Trichloroethene ND< 13.4 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 13,4 Vinyl chloride ND< 13.4 ELAP Number 10968 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: ec cal Director CNorobenzene ND< 13.4 Ethylbenzene ND< 13.4 Toluene NO 13,4 m,p-Xylene NO< 13.4 o -Xylene NO< 13.4 Styrene ND< 33.4 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 13.4 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 13.4 IA -Dichlorobenzene ND< 13.4 Ketones Results in u/ K Acetone ND< 66.9 2-Butanone ND< 66.9 2-Hexanone NO< 33.4 4-Methyl-2-'p.entanone ND< 33.4 Method: EPA 82606 Data File: V42171.D This report is part or a multipage documeGl and should only be evaluated in its entirely. Chain or Custody provides additional Information, Including compliance With sample corrdidan requirements upon receipt. - - 07D31BV4.XLS PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SUVICEIt, WC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, Now York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges (Additional STARS Compounds) NO< 13.4 Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. NO< 13,4 Miscellaneous Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 NDC 33,4 Lab Sample Number: 1625 Client Job Number: TW0700W Field Location: HA -4 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene n-Propylbenzene lsopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Naphthalene FLAP Number 10958 ND< 13.4 1,3,5-Tr1methylbenzene NO< 13.4 NO< 13,4 Miscellaneous NO< 13.4 Methyl tent butyl Ether ND<. 13.4 NDC 33,4 T T _ Method: EPA 82606 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram 'ND< 13,4 Data Flle: V42171 .D f a Signature: Bruce HQogesteger. T6c>i4bal Director This report Is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in Its entirety, Chain of Custody provides addlllonal Information, Including compliance with sample eondRico requirements upon receipt. 070316V4.XL3 I PARADIGM ENVIRDRMENTAL SERVICES, IHS, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile_AnalVsis Report for Soilsi(Solids/Sludcfes Client: Conrad Geosclence Cori). Client Job Site Client Job Number: Field Location; Field ID Number: Sample Type: Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform D ibromochlorometha ne 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane 1, 1 -Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dlchloropropane cls-1,3-Dichloropropene trains-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride , 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane Tetra ch loroethene . 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ELAP Number 10958 Tinkelman - Wappinger TW070010 GB -1 (0-12") NIA Soil ND<.9.10 ND< 9,10 NDe 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9,10 N17< 9,10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< .9,10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9,10 ND< 9.10 ND< 22.8 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9,10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 ND< 9.10 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram i Signature: Bruce Moogesteger: Td'chrilafrOlrector Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1635 Date Sampled: 01/1812007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 ma Chlorobenzene ND -e 9,10 Ethylbenzene ND< 9.10 Toluene ND< 9.10 m,p-Xylene ND< 9.10 o -Xylene ND< 9,10 Styrene ND< 22.8 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 9.10 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 9,10 1.4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 9.10 Ketones Results in u K Acetone ND< 45.5 2-Butanone ND< 45.5 2-Nexanone ND< 22.8 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 22.8 Miscellaneous Results in u K Carbon disulfide ND< 22.8 Vinyl acetate NDS 22.8 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V42179,0 Tars report is parl of a muillpage document and should only be evaluated in Its entirety. Chaln of Custody provides additional information. Induding compliance with sample candlUon requirements upon reeeipt. 070318WS XtS rtLPARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE& INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York' 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Ana& sis Re ort for' Soils/Solids/Sludges Additional STARS Cam ounds l Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp, Client Job Site: Client Job Number: Field -Location: Field ID Number: Sample Type: Tinkelman - Wappinger TW 070010 GB -1 (0-12") NIA Soil Lab Project Number; 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1635 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 n -u yipenzerle No< 9.10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND< 9.10 sec-butylbenzene ND< 9.10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 9.10 tent-Butylbenzene ND< 9.10 n- Pro pylbenzene. NO< 9,10 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 9.10 Methyi tert-butyl Ether NO< 9.10 p-isopropyltoluene ND< 9,10 Naphthalene, ND< 22.8 FI AP Numhpr 1MrA M.th.,& 1-MiN a5rzna nolo Pit.- vn9470 n Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug ! Kg = microgram per Kilogram ) �. Signature: Bruce Hoo6steg&I'TII6>4f0irector This report is part of a mulbpage document and should only be evatualed in its entirely. Chain or Custody protides additional informallon, Including complianCe with sample candlRon rectwomenls upon receipt. - 97031MSAL5 PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SWICEs, nic. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 . (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Sollds/Slud es Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 12,5 Lab Sample Number: 1634 Client Job Number: TW070010 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 12.5 Field Location: GB -2 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field 117 Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Bromomethane - ND< 12.5 Bromoform ND< 12.5 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 12,5 Chloroethane ND< 12.5 Chloromethane ND< 12.5 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 12.5 Chloroform . ND< 12.5 Dibromochloromethane ND< 12.5 1,1-Dichloroethane ND< 12.5 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 12.5 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 12,5 cls- 1',2-Dichloroethene ND< 12,5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 12.5 1,2-Dichloropropane ND< 12.5 cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 12,5 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND< 12.5 Methylene chloride ND< 31.2 ;1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane - ND< 12.5 Tetrachloroethene NO< 12,5 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 12.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 12.5 Trichloroethene ND< 12.5 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 12.5 !Vinyl chloride ND< 12.5 Ef_AF NUMDer 1uybZ3 Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger, Tec pi I Director FVA romatics Results in u K �Benzene ND< 12.5 Chlorobenzene ND< 12.5 Ethylbenzene ND< 12.5 Toluene ND< 12.5 m,p-Xylene ND< 12.5 o -Xylene ND< 12.5 Styrene ND< 31.2 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 12.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 12.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 12.5 Method: EP. Ketones Results in u K Acetone ND< 82.5 2-Butanone ND< 62.5 2-Hexatnone NDe 31.2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 31.2 Miscellaneous Results iin u ! K Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate ND< 31.2 ND< 31.2 A P9RnR Tata File, V42178.D This report is pail of a multipage document end should only he evaluated in Its entirely. Chain of Custody provides addlOonst information, including corfpllance with samrft condition requirernenls upon receipt. 070318WCXLS PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INc, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (565) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Vglatile Anal sis ke ort for Soils/Solids/Slud es Additional STARS -Com ounds ` Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 12.5 ter#-Butylbenzene Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 ND< 12.5 Lab Sample Number: 1634 Client Job Number: TW070010 Mothyl tort -butyl Ether� ND< 12.5 p-Isopropyltoluene Field Location- GB -2 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/98/2007 Field ID Number: N/A Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 n n-outymenzene 1,Z,4-Inmethyloenzerie 1vu< tiz.o soc•Butylb.enzeno ND< 12.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 12.5 ter#-Butylbenzene NDS 12.5 n-Propylbenzene ND< 12.5 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene hiD< 12•.5 Mothyl tort -butyl Ether� ND< 12.5 p-Isopropyltoluene NO< 12,5 Naphthalene ND< 31.2 FLAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82608 Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug ! Kg = microgram per Kilogram ()ata File: V421 78.0 S 011 Signature: Bruce Koogesteger: Te cal Olrector This report Is pari of a mullipage document and should only he evaluated In Its entirety. Chain of Custody provides eddltlonai information. Including compliance wllh sample condllion requirements upon receipi. 07031SW4.XLS PARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Client Job Number: Field. Location: Field Ila Number: Sample Type: uromooicnloromemane Bromomethane Bromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chioroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform Dibronnochloromethane 1,1-01chloroethane 1,2-Dichioroethane 1,1-0.1chloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dich.loropropane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans- l,3-Dichforopropene Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride ' ELAP Number 10958 Tinkelman - Wappinger TW 070010 GB -3 (0-12") NIA Soil sults In Ug I ND< 8,50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8,50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 21.3 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 NO< 8.50 ND< 8.50 ND< 8.50 N D < 8.50 Comments: ND denotes Non Defect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hooge egen TcISh (rector Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab $ample Number: 1633 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/2212007 Aromatics. Results In Uq I K Benzene ND< 8.50 Chlorobenzene ND< 8.50 Ethytbenzene ND< 8.50 Toluene ND< 8,50 m,p-Xylene ND< 8.50 0 -Xylene ND< 8.50 Styrene ND< 21.3 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.50 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8,50 1.4 -Dichlorobenzene Np< 8,50 Ketones Results in u 1 K Acetone. ND< 42.5 2-Butanone ND< 42.5 2-Hexanone ND< 21.3 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 21.3 Method: EPA acetate ND< 21.3 Data File: V42177,D . This report Is part or a mul0page document and should only be evaluated In its enUfely. Chain of,(;vstody provides addlUonal information, Including compliance vdlh sampie condifto rectwenlents upon receipt. - 07031BW3.XLS PARADIGM Resatis in u q/ K Aromatics EIIYIAOJIMENTAL SEBYicEE, IN, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14648 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647- 3311. ND< 8.50 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Volatife Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Additional STARS Compounds) Client: Conrad_ Geoscience Corn. 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 8.50 Client Job Site: T'inkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1633 Client Job Number: TW070010 Isopropylbenzene Field Location: GB -3 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01118.12007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Aromatics Resatis in u q/ K Aromatics Results in u / K n-Butylbenzene ND< 8.50 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND< 8.50 seo-Butylbenzene ND< 8.50 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 8.50 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 8.50 n-Propylbenzene ND< 8,50 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 8.50 Methyl tort -butyl Ether ND< 8.50 p-Isopropyltoluene No< 8.50 Naphthalene ND< 21.3 FLAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Method: FPA 826013 Data Flle: V42177.D Ar r k i Signature: Bruce Hoogosteger, TeX nical Director This report is "dot a muilipage document and should only be evaluated In its entirely. Chain of Custody provides additional Infwrrvtlon, Including compliance with sample conal an requirements upon receipt. 07031 oW3.XL3 Fal -PARADIGM. ENVINONXERM SERVICES, INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311. Volatile Analysis Resar# for SoilslSolidslSlud e Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Client Job Number: Feld Location: Feld ID dumber: Sample Type: Bromomethane Sromoform Carbon Tetrachloride Chloroethane Chloromethane 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether Chloroform D€bromoc.hloromethane 1,1-Dichioroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane. 1,1'-Dichloroethene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-12-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,3-Dichlcropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Methylene chloride 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene 1,1,1-Thchloroethane 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane Vinyl chloride FI AP Nllmhpr 104.riR Tinkelman - Wappinger TW 070010 GB -3 (14) NIA Soil ND< 8.96 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND<, 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8,98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8,98 ND< 8,98 ND< 8,98 ND< 8.98 ND< 22.4 ND< 8,98 ND< 8,96 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8.98 ND< 8,98 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram i Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: fejhgtK Tech'Dlrector Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number; 1636 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Aromatics Results in u 1 K Benzene ND< 8.98 Chlorobenzene ND< 8.98 Ethylbenzene ND< 8,98 Toluene ND< 8.98 m,p-Xylene ND< 8.98 o -Xylene ND< 8,98 Styrene NO< 22.4 1,2-D€chlorobenzene ND< 8.98 1,3-D€chlorobenzene ND< 8.98 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8,98 Ketones Results €n u t K Acetone ND< 44.9 2-Butanone ND< 44.9 2-Hexanone ND< 22.4 4 -Methyl -2- entanone ND< 22.4 Miscellaneous Results €n u 1 K Carbon disulfide ND< 22.4 Vinyl acetate ND< 22.4 EFTA 826DB Data File: V4218U,U This report Is paa of a mofppage document and should only be eVelualed in its entirely. Chain of Custody provides additional Infornallon, including compliance POlh sample condition requirements upon receipt. 070319W6,91.6 PARADIGM ENYIRoltM[NT1t1 SERYfCES. 1116. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (685) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for SoifslSolidslSludges (Additional STARS Compounds Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp, Client Job Site: Tinkelman -, Wappinger Client Job Number: TW070010 Field Location: GB -3'(1-4') Field 11) Number: NIA Sample Type: Soil Lab Project.Number: 070318 Lab Sample Number: 1636 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Aromatics Results in u / Kq Aromatics Results in u 1 Kq n-Butylbenzene ND< 8.98 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND< 8,98 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 8.98 1,3,5-Trimothylbenzene ND< 8.98 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 8:98 n-Propylbenzene ND< 8.98 Miscellaneous lsopropylbenzene ND< 8.98 Methyl tert-butyl Ether ND< 8.98. p-Isopropyltnluene ND< 8.98 Naphthalene ND< 22.4 ELAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug ! Kg = microgram per Kilogram Method: EPA 82608 Data File: V42180.0 Signaturo: Bruce Hoogesteger: Technlo6rDlrector This report is part of a mullipage document and shau!d only be evaluated in its entirety. Chain or Custody provides addnlonat inforrnet}on, including compllance With sample condition requirements upon receipt. - - - 070318MALS pw�PAR ADI M EHnRONMEHTAL SERVICES.1NC, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Sol ds/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp, Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number; 07-0318 Bromomethane ND< 10.3 Lab Sample Number: 1632 Client Job Number: TWO 70010 Chloroethane ND< 10,3 Field Location: GB -4 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field le Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Ffalocarbons Results in u ! K Bromodichloromethane ND< 10,3 Bromomethane ND< 10.3 Bromoform ND< 10,3 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 10.3 Chloroethane ND< 10,3 Chloromethane NDS 10.3 2-Chleroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 10,3 Chloroform ND< 10.3 Dibromochloromethane N'D< 10,3 1,1-Dichloroethane ND< 10.3 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 10,3 1, 1 -Dichloroethene ND< 10.3 cis-1,2=Dichloroethene ND< 10.3 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 10.3 1,2-Dichloro propane ND< 10.3 cis- 1,3-Dichlorop ropene ND< 103 trans-1,3-D.ichloropropene ND< 10.3 Mothylene chloride ND< 25.8 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 10.3 Tetrachloroethene ND< 10.3 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 10,3 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 10.3 Trichloroethene ND< 10.3 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 10.3 Vinyl chloride ND< 10.3 EL AP Number 10958 Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram Aromatics Results Benzene ND< 10.3 Chlorobenzene ND< 10.3 Ethyibenzene ND< 1.03 Toluene ND< 10.3 m,p-Xylene ND< 10.3 o -Xylene ND< 10.3 Styrene ND< 25,8 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.3 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.3 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 10.3 Ketone''s Results in u / K Acetone ND< 51,6 2-Butanone ND< 51.6 2-l-lexanone ND< 25.8 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 25.8 Miscellaneous Results in u 1 K Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate ND< 25.8 ND< 25,8 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V42176.D ! L 4 Signature: Bruce Hoogest ger: Tech ' Director 'Ns report is part or a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirely. Chain,of Custody provides additional Information, including conn lance whit sample condition requiremenis upon receipt. - 0703918MAS PARADIGM ENYfflOOIMEj TA SfRYICEE, NfC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647.- 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Anal sis Report for Soils/Solids/Stud es Additional STARS Compounds) Client, Conrad Geosclence Corp, Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 10.3 Lab Sample Number: 1632 Client Job Number: TW070D10 Field Location: GB -4 (0-12") hate Sampled: 01118/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 n-butyinenzene. NU< 1U.3 1,:L,4 -I rlmetnylbenzene NU<"IV-3 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 10.3 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 10.3 tert-Butyl benzene ND< 10.3 n-Propylbenzene NO< 10.3 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 10,3 Methyl tert-butyl Ether ND i0.3 p-Isopropyltoluene ND< 10.3 Naphthalene ND< 25..8 EL.AP Number 10958 Method; EPA 82608 Data File: V42176_D Comments: ND denotes Non petect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hooges eger: TechnOMrector This report Is part of a mullipage document and should only " evaluated In Its entirely, Chain of Cvstody provides addltional inlormation, Including compliance with sample condition requirements upon receipt. 070318M.A.S P!vLPARAD1QM ENIf1BOMMENTAt Ss Arises, laic. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Client Job Number: TW070010 Field Location: GB -5 (0-17") Field ID Number; NIA Sample Type: Soli Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / kg = microgram per Kfiogram Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1628 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date 'Analyzed., 01/22/2007 Benzene Bromomethane ND< 8.29 Chlorobenzene ND<.8.29 Bromoform ND< 8.29 ND< 8.29 Toluene Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 8..29 m,p-Xylene ND< 8.29 Chloroethane ND< 8.29 ND< 8.29 . Styrene Chloromethane ND< 8.29 1,2-0ichlorobenzene ND< 8.29 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 8.29 ND< 8.29 1.4 -Dichlorobenzene Chloroform ND< 8.29 Dibromochloromethane ND< 8.29 1,1-Dlchloroethane ND< 8,29 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 8,29 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 8,29 cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 8.29 trans- 1,2- Dich lo roethene ND< 8.29 1,2-01chloro propane , ND< 8,29 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene N[)<"8.29 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND< 8,29 Methylene chloride ND< 20.7 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 8.29 Tetrachloroethene ND< 8.29 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< B.29 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 8.29 Trichloroethene ND<. 8.29 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 8.29 Vin I chloride ND< 8.29 FLAP Number 10958 Method: EP. Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / kg = microgram per Kfiogram Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number: 1628 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Date Received: 01/19/2007 Date 'Analyzed., 01/22/2007 Benzene fWJ< b,ZU Chlorobenzene ND<.8.29 Ethylbenzene ND< 8.29 Toluene ND< 8.29 . m,p-Xylene ND< 8.29 o -Xylene ND< 8.29 . Styrene ND< 20.7 1,2-0ichlorobenzene ND< 8.29 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.29 1.4 -Dichlorobenzene NDS 8.29 Ketones Results in u 1 K. Acetone ND< 41.4 2-Butanone ND< 41.4 2-Hexanone ND< 20,7 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 20.7 Miscellaneous Results in u / K Carbon tsulfde Vinyl acetate ND< 20.7 ND< 20.7 A RgrnR Data Pile: V42174.0 r Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger, chnical Director This report is part of a rnultfpage document and should only be evalUaled In Its entirety. Chain of custody provides additional Information, including carnpllance with sample condition requirements upon receipl. 0703113WALS ��!TT E179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14606 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Solls/Solids/Sludges (Additional STAR$ Compounds) Client: Conracl Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 8.29 Lab Sample Number: 1628 Client Job Number: TW070010 Field Location: GB -5 (0-17") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number; N/A Date received: 01119/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 n-tsutyibenzene Nu< d.29 1,2,4-1r1metnyMenzene Nul- a.ca sec-Butylbenzene ND< 8.29 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 8.29 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 8.29 n-rropylbenzene ND< 8.29 Miscellaneous lsopropylbenzene ND< 8.29 _ __ Methyl tent -butyl Ether ND< 8.29 p-Isopropyltoluene ND< 8.29 Naphthalene ND< 20,7 ELAP Number 10956 Method: EPA 82608 Data File: V42174.D Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram i Signature: Bruce Hoogeste er: Te ector This report is pall ora multipage dooumenl and should only be evaluated in Its entirely. Chaln of Cuslody provides additional Infomialion, Induding i=VIIafrce wtlh sample condlow requirements upon receipt. a70318V7ALS PARADIGM ElIYiRDNMMAL SERrle>:5, INC, 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 . 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids]Sludctes Client: Conrad Geosdehee_Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Bromomethane ND< 11.1 Lab Sample Number: 1631 Client Job Number: TW070010 Chloroethane ND< 11.1 Field Location: C13-6 (0-12") Date Sampled: 0111812047 Field ID Number- NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 H locarbons Results in u 1 K Bromodlchloromethane ND< 11.1 Bromomethane ND< 11.1 Bromoform ND< 11.1 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 11.1 Chloroethane ND< 11.1 Chloromethane ND< 11.1 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 11.1 Chloroform NDS 11.1 Dibromochloromethane ND< 11-.1 .1,1-RicNoroethane ND< 11.1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 1'1.1 1,1-Dlchloroethene ND< 11.1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 11.1. trans- 1,2- D ich loro ethe ne ND< 11.1 1,2-Dichloropropone ND< 11.1 cis-1,3-01chloropropene ND< 11-1 trans- l,3-Dichloropro pene ND< 11,1 Methylene chloride ND,< 27.9 1,1,2,2• -Tetrachloroethane ND< 11.1 Tetrachloroethene ND< 11,.1 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 11,1 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 11.1 Trichloroethene ND< 11.1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 11.1 Vlnyl chloride ND< 11.1 FLAP Number 10856 Comments: NO denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Aromatics Results in u / K Benzene ND< 11.1 Chlorobenzene ND< 11.1 Ethylbenzene ND< 11.1 Toluene ND< 111 m,p-Xylene ND< 11:1 o -Xylene ND< 11.1 Styrene ND< 27.9 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.1 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 11.1 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< ii.1 Ketones Results In u / Acetone ND< 557 2-Butanone ND< 55.7 2-Hexanone ND< 27.9 4=Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 27.9 Miscellaneous Results in u / K Carbon disulfide ND< 27.9 Vinyl acetate ND< 27.9 Method: EPA 82608 Data File: V421151) Signature: Bruce Hoogeglegen. nical Director This report is part of a mulllpage document and should only be evaluated In its entirely. Chain or Cuslody provides additional informallon, Induding compliance Wlh sample Gond don requirements upon recerpt. - - 070318W1.XL5 PARADIGM ENIIIAOMMENTAL SERVICES, U. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for SoilslSolids/Slud es Additional STARS Com ounds Client: Conrad Geoscience CorA, Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 nru< IM 1 Lab Sample Number: 1631 Client Job Number: TW070010 tert-Butylbenzene Field Location: GB -6 (0-12") Date Sampled: 0/110/2007 Field ID Number. NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date.Analyzed: 0112212007 Comments: NO demotes Non Detect ug 1 Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger, Tec l Director This tepod Is part ora mullipage document and should only be evaluated In its entirely, Chain or custody provldes additional information. Including compliance with sample rDndilion requUements upon+eaelpi. - 0703f0wl.XLS n-Butylbenzene ND< 11.1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene nru< IM sec-Butylbenzene No< 11.1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 11.1 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 11.1 n-Propylbenzene ND< 11.1 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 11.1 Methyl telt-butyl Ether ND< 11.1 p-isopropyltoluene ND< 11.1' Naphthalene ND< 27.9 FLAP Number 10958 Method: EPA -82606 Data File: V42175.1) Comments: NO demotes Non Detect ug 1 Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger, Tec l Director This tepod Is part ora mullipage document and should only be evaluated In its entirely, Chain or custody provldes additional information. Including compliance with sample rDndilion requUements upon+eaelpi. - 0703f0wl.XLS owIPARADIGM ENVIRONMENTAL SE84PCES. INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, NeW York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647.- 3311 Halocarbons Volatile Analysis Report for Solis/Solids/Sludges ND< 8.22 Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp, NO< 8.22 -Sromoform Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 ND< 8.22 Chloromethane Lab Sample Number: 1627 Client Job Number: TW070010 ND< 8.22 Dibromochloromethane Field Location: GB -7 (0-18") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/2212007 Halocarbons Results in u / K Bromodichloromethane ND< 8.22 Bromomethane NO< 8.22 -Sromoform ND< 8.22 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 8.22 Chloroethane ND< 8.22 Chloromethane ND< 8.22 2-Chloroethyl vinyl lather ND< 8.22 Chloroform ND< 8.22 Dibromochloromethane NDe 8.22 1,1-Dichloroethane NO< 8.22 1,2-Dlchloroethane ND< 8.22 1,1-Dichloroethene IN D.< 8,22 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 8.22 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 8.22 1,2-Dichioropropane ND< 8.22 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 8,22 trans -1 ,3 -Di chloropro pone ND< 8,22. Methylene chloride ND< 20.6 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 8.22 Tetrachloroethene ND< 8.22 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 8.22 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND< 8.22 Trichloroethene ND< 8.22 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 8.22 Vinyl chloride ND< 8.22 Aromatics Results in u / K Benzene ND< 8.22 Chlorobenzene ND< 8.22 Bthylbenzene ND< 8.22 Toluene ND< 8.22 m,p-Xyiene NO< 8.22 o -Xylene ND< 8.22 Styrene ND< 20.6 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.22 1,3-Dichloroben7ene ND< 8,22 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.22 Ketones Results in u K Acetone NO< 41.1 2-Butanone NO< 41.1 2-Hexanone ND< 20.6 4 -Methyl -2- enta.none ND< 20.6 Miscellaneous Results in uq 7= Carbon disulfide ND< 20.6 Vinyl acetate ND< 20.6 ELAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 8260E Comments; ND denotes Non Detect ug 1 Kg = microgram per Kilogram Data rile: v4cl ra.0 Signature: Bruce Hoog6steger: Techn cal ctor This report Is park of a mulllpage.documenl and should only be evaluated in Its entirely. Chain of Custody provides additional Information, Including compllance oth sample cmdliion requirements upon recelpl. 070.316VISALS FiiiFi PARADIGM fNOwIMEtfThL SERVICFt, FMC. 178 Lake AVenUe Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 ` Volatile Analysis Re ort for SoiislSolidslS.lud es Additional STARS Compounds) Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tihkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 ND< 8.22 Lab Sample Number: 1627 Client Job Number: TW070010 ND< 8.22 Methyi tert-butyl e=ther ND< 8.22 Field Location: GB -7 (0-18") Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field tD'Number: N/A Date Received: 01/19/2007 . Sample Type: Soil Date Analyied: 01/22/2007 sec-Butylbenzene ND< 8.22 1,3,5 -Trim ethyl benzene ND< 8.22 ter(-Butylbenzene ND< 8.22 n-Propylbenzene ND< 8.22 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 8.22 Methyi tert-butyl e=ther ND< 8.22 p-isopropyltoluene ND< 8.22 Naphthalene. NO< 20.6 FLAP dumber 10958 Method: EPA 8260E Data File: V42173.D Comments: ND denotes Non detect ug 1 Kg = microgram per Kilogram Signature: Bruce Ho6gesfeber.- ,T^rtical Director This report is pert of a Wtipage document and should only he evaluated In Its entirety. Chain or Custody provides additional information, Including compliance with sample CondtSon - requkements upon recelpt, - 97031MALS IFC -PARADIGM ENViROMMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585),647-25,31) FAX (585} 647 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges f Client:, Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger. Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 8.74 Lab Sample Number: 1626 Client Job Number: TW070010 2-Ch[oroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 8.74 Field Location: GB -8 (0-12") ' Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: N/A' Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample 'Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 oca Bromornethane ND< 8.74 Bromoform ND< 8.74 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 8.74 Chloroethane ND< 8.74 Chloromethane ND< 8.74 2-Ch[oroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 8.74 Chloroform ND< 8.74 Dibromochloromethane ND< 8.74 1,1-Dichloroethane ND< 8.74 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 8.74 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 8.74 cis-12-Dichloroethene ND< 8.74 trans- l,2-Dichloroethene ND< 8.74 1,2-Dichloropro pane ND< 8.74 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 8.74 trans- l,3-Dichloropropene ND< 8.74 Methylene chloride ND< 21.8 .1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 8.74 Tetrachloroethene ND< 8.74 11,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 8.74 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 8.74 iTrichloro6thene ND< .8.74 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 8.74 ;Vinyl chloride ND< 8,74 FLAP Number 10958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug / Kg = microgram per Kilogram Aromatics Results In u I Benzene ND: 8.74 Chlorobenzene ND< 8.74 E.thylbenzene ND< 8.74 Toluene ND< 8-74 m,p-Xylene ND< 8.74 o -Xylene ND< 8.74 Styrene Nb< 21.8 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.74 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene NO< 8.74 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 8.74 Ketones Results in tl / Ko I Acetone ND< 43.7 2-Butanone ND< 43.7 2-Hexanone ND< 21.8 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND< 21.8 Miscellaneous Results in u / K Carbon disuffide ND{ 29.8 Vinyl acetate ND< 21.8 Method: EPA 8260B Data rtie: v4Yl rz.0 Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: T669KK Director This report Is part of a mWOpege document and should only be evaluated In its cnllrriy. Chain of Custody provfdes additional Informaticn„Including coroptlance vAlh sample condlllm requirements upon receipt. 07031OV5.XLS .-PARADIGM ENTMOMMENTAI SERVICES. INC. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Soils/Solids/Sludges Additional STARS C m ounds Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. ND< 6.74 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Lab Sample Number: 1626 Client Job Number TW0700110 Field Location: G13-8 (0-12") Date Sampled: 01/1812007 Field lid Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Soil Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Aromatics Results in u 1 Kg Aromatics Results in u 1 K n-Bury€benzene ND< 6.74 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NO< 6.74 sec -Butyl benzene ND< 8.74 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 8.74 tert-Butylbenzene ND< 8.74 n-Propylbenzene ND< 8.74 Miscellaneous I sopropyl benzene ND< 8:74 Methyl tart -butyl Ether ND< 8.74 p-Isopropyltoluene ND< 8.74 Naphthalene ND< 21.8 �tAr Ivumoer 1ua5u Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug I Kg = microgram per Kilogram Nleln= trA tlLtiut3 uata rue. v44 r 14.L S#gnature: Bruce Hoogesteger, Technlca rector This report Is pad of a rouMpage docurtenl and should only be evaluated in Its entirety, Chain of Custody proMes additional Information, Including compliance wllh sample Gond Ron mquirenrnts upon receipt. 0701MMS . FLFLP ENYIHONM TU SERVICES,1xr. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 847 - 3311 Bromomethane Volatile Analysis Report for Non -potable Water ND< 2.00 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 2.00 Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp.. ND< 2.00 Chloromethane Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number; 07-0318 ND< 2.00 Dibromochloromethane Lab Sample Number: 1629 Client Job Number: TWO70010 ND< 2.00 1,1-Dichloroethene Field Location: PW -1 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Typo: Water Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Bromomethane ND< 2,00 Bromoform ND< 2.00 Carbon Tetrachloride ND< 2.00 Chloroethane ND< 2.00 Chloromethane ND< 2,00 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 2.00 Chloroform . ND< 2.00 Dibromochloromethane ND< 2,00 1,1-Diohloroethane ND< 2.00 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 2.00 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 2,00 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 2,00 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND< 2.00 1,2-Dichloropropane ND< 2.00 cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 2.00. trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND< 2.00 Methylene chloride ND<. 5.00 1;1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane " ND< 2,00 Tetrachloroethane ND< 2,00 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 200 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 2.00 Trichloroethene ND< 2.00 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 2,00 Vinyl chloride ND< 2,00 ELAP Number 50958 Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug 1 L = microgram per Liter Aromatics Results In u 1 L Benzene ND< 0.700 Chlorobenzene NO< 2.00 Ethylbenzene ND< 2.00 Toluene ND< 2.00 m,p-Xylene ND< 200 o -Xylene ND< 2.00 Styrene ND< 5.00 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 2.00 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 2.00 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 2.00 Method: EPA Ketones Results In U 1 L Results in U 1 L Acetone ND< 10.0 ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 2-Butanone ND< 10.0 Data t=ile: V42163,D 2-Hexanone NO< 5.00 4 -Methyl -2 -Penta none NO< 5,00 Miscellaneous Results in U 1 L Carbon disuifl e Vinyl acetate ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 f 9SOR Data t=ile: V42163,D Signature; Bruce Hooge9tegeQ06Ffhical Director Thls report Is part of a mullipape docurneat and should only be ovelualed in its entirely. Chain of Custody provides additional Information, Including compliance with sample condition m requireents upon receipt. . I 070318V8.XLS PARADIGM V"PlIxygurrAi 3E"Es, INC- 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile Analysis Report for -Non potable Water (Additional STARS Compounds) t , Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: 07-0318 Lab Sample Number; 1629 Client Job Number: TWO70010 Field Location: PW -1 Date Sampled: 01/1812007 Field ID Number: WA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Water Hate Analyzed: 01/22/2007 J Aromatics Results in ug 1 L Aromatics Results n-Butylbenzene ND< 2,00 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND< 2.00 -sec-Butylbenzene ND< 2:00 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND< 2,00 test-Butylbenzene ND< 2,00 n-Propylbenzene ND< 2,00 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene ND< 2.00 Methyt tent -butyl Ether ND< 2,00 p-Isopropyltoluene ND< 2,00 Naphthalene ND< 5,00 FLAP Number 10958 Method: EPA 82606 Data File: V421W.o Comments: NO denotes Nan Detect ug / L = microgram per Liter t l Signature: Bruce Hcoges eget: TWhical Director This report Is part of a multipage document and should only be evaluated in its entirety. Chain of Custody provides additional Wormation, Including compliance with sample coddltion requirements upon recelpt. 0703it3 axLs PARADIGM ENYI11011114ENTAL. SERVICES, lilt. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585.) 647 - 2530 FAX (585) 647 - 3311 Volatile_ Analysis Report for Non -potable Water Client: Conrad Geoscience Corp. Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number: '07-0318 Bromomethane ND< 2.00 .Lab Sample Number: 1630 Client Job Number: TW070010 Chloroethane ND< 2..00 Field Location: PW -2 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed: 01122/2007 Halocarbons Results In u 1 L Bromodichloromethane ND< 2.00 Bromomethane ND< 2.00 Gromoform ND< 2.00 Carbon Tetrachloride N.D< 2.00 Chloroethane ND< 2..00 Chloromethane. ND< 2.00 2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether ND< 2.00 Chloroform ND< 2.00 Dibrornochloromethane ND< 2.00 1,1-Dichloroethane NO< 200 1,2-Dichloroethane ND< 2.00 1,1-Dichloroethene ND< 2.00 cis-l,2-t)€chloroethene ND< 2.00 trans-1,2-D€chloroethane ND< 2.00 1,2-Dichloroproparie ND< 2.00 cis-1,3-Dlchloropropene ND< 2.00 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ND< 2,00 Methylene chloride ND< 5.00 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane ND< 2.00 Tetrachloroethene ND< 2.00 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane ND< 2.00 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane ND< 2.00 Trichloroethene ND< 2.00 Trichlorofluoromethane ND< 2.00 Vin I chloride ND< 2,00 ELAP Number 10358 Comments ND denotes Non Deteel ug 1 L = microgram per Liter Aromatics Results in u/ L Benzene ND< 0-700 Chlorobenzene ND< 2.00 Ethylbenzene ND< 2.00. Toluene ND< 2.00 m,p-Xylene ND< 2.00 o -Xylene ND< 2.00 Styrene ND< 5.00 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 2.00 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene ND< 2.00 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene. ND< 200 Ketones Results in u L Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate Acetone ND< 10A 2-Butanone ND< 10.0 2-Hexanone NO< 5.00 4-Methyl.-2-pentanone ND< 5.00 Miscellaneous Results in u / L Carbon disulfide Vinyl acetate ND< 5.00 ND< 5.00 Method: EPA 8260B Data File: V421 64,U Y 1 Signature: Bruce Hoogesteger: rech ' I Director This (apart is pan m of a uum ipage document and should only be ev'alualed in its efnlirely. Chain of Cuslody provides additional iniormallon, including complianceWth sample condlllan requlremenls upon recelpi. 07031MALS FTiPARADIGM [IMOOMMEHTAI SWIM. M. 179 Lake Avenue Rochester, New York 14608 (585) 647 - 2530 FAX (585)647-3311 Volatile Analysis Report for Non -potable Water Additional STARS Com ounds Client: Conrad Geoscience Coro, Client Job Site: Tinkelman - Wappinger Lab Project Number; 07-0318 n-Butylbenzene NO< 2,00 Lab Sample Number,, 1630 Client Job Number; TW070010 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene ND.< 2.00 Field Location: PW -2 Date Sampled: 01/18/2007 Field ID Number: NIA Date Received: 01/19/2007 Sample Type: Water Date Analyzed: 01/22/2007 Aromatics Results In u 1 L Aromatics Results in ua I L n-Butylbenzene NO< 2,00 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND< 2.00 sec-.Butylbenzene ND< 2,00 1,3,5 Trimethylbenzene ND.< 2.00 test-Butylbenzene ND< 2,00 n-Propylbenzene ND< 2.00 Miscellaneous Isopropylbenzene NIO< 2.00 Methyl tert-butyl Ether. ND< 2.00 p-Isopropyltoluene ND< 2.00 Naphthalene ND< 5.00 tLAI' Number 1 UBbb McMod: tVA bZUUU vara rna, vwc k9%.� Comments: ND denotes Non Detect ug 1 L.= microgram per Liter Signature: Bruce HoogestegeC TZchnical Director This report is part of a milipage documsnt and should only be evaluated In IIs entfrely. Chain or Custody provides additional Information. Inciudln9 compliance Wth sample condition requirements upon receipt, 070311iV8.XL8 WE J � ° L U U 47 N Z �+ Z Z n W Z 2 U J ooQrJ C4 'r' F: CIA z WLU tiJ 7 Z t rTi 4 0 a � WE Y lu a ���Immw ��Mlm J � U N Z �+ Z Z n pW 2 U J ooQrJ C4 'r' L z WLU tiJ 7 Z t d N o yg, a o U a x m V M"� a r M cc sw '6ti- Y lu a ���Immw ��Mlm m U N Z i Z z E U J 12- �E d N o yg, a o U a x m V M"� a r e v.- o m U N Z i Z z E U J d N o yg, a o U a x m V M"� a LL 0 1 U � a 1 E E E Q N 4�0co � d 16 Zuj 0 U fi sn aW� r _o9_ 110 F.. ro 0000 a z 1 E E E Q � d D 110 F.. ro 0000 a z a z W Z Q 7m��°l+� Z ui A 0 0 0 V E z z z z R 11 N � d N O. N a a J w E N m L dr)m w m� a c Q y v c U � � oz a ([ 4 0 � 0. % 4 ~ O � � �• 2 ?c � lk� p Q P1 j ¢ � X R • = 1 � P as rt tit E 4 S., C iZZ'� fYj Li U a Lt a a LLJ � •Ts-. W � O �} I. N � R�; � s 2 -s. �, 00, ku W N �qq C7¢am 1-0 MI (�DWr lu ?LU fo] W O! V4jx 0 7i N r HL a r C11 (Y) 'T LO CO h GO M t OS - U V of 4� i E Vin` d a o. a `Q U � J `l J 0 -AJ RDa "Juc a" c A 0 0 0 V E z z z z R 11 N � d N O. N a a J w E N m L dr)m w m� a c Q y v c U � � rILL VUf I o 0 R4CKER'.. C�0 Archaeology Services, Inc. E/ie f7ooa e�.� o�Elieflsr�esEv�.r REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS Phase I Archaeological Investigation for the proposed Adams Fairacre Farm subdivision Hughsonville, 'Town of Wappingers Dutchess County, New York November 2007 Prepared for: Morris Associates, Poughkeepsie, New York Prepared by: Alfred G. Cammisa'RPA Felicia Cammisa, Alexander Padilla Report #: 536 TRACKER ARCHAEOLOGY SERVICES, INC. MONROE, NY 10950 . (845) 783-4082 NORTH BABYLON, NY 11703 9 (631) 321-1380 ! MANAGEMENT SUMMARY l PR#: Done known Involved agencies: Town of Wappingers Phase: Phase IA & I3 Location: Hughsonville Town of Wappingers Dutchess County Survey Area: Length: about 712 feet (217 meters) north -south Width: about 807 feet (246 m) east -west.. Total Acres Surveyed: approximately 8 acres (3.2 hectares) exclusive of wetlands and steep slopes USGS: Wappingers Falls, NX Survey overview_ ST no. & interval: 132 ST's at 50 to 25 ft (15-7.5m) intervals. Size of freshly plowed area: na Surface survey transect interval: na Results: No prehistoric remains Slightly scattered historic & mid -20th century remains Results of Architectural Survey: No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries in project area: 11 No. Of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: 6 { No. Of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: none No. Of identified eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: none Y Authors: Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A./RPA Felicia Cammisa, B.A. Alexander Padilla, B.A. Date of Report: Report completed November, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Environment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2 Prehistoric Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Historic Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3--4 Field Methods . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Field Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 5 Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7 Appendix 1: Figures and Photos the Appendix 2: Shovel Tests Figure Appendix 3: Map Documented Structures of LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Portion of the Wappingers Falls, New York USGS. Figure 2 Location of the ST's on the project area. Figure 3 Portion of the 1850 Sydney map. Figure 4 Portion of the 1858 Gillette map. Figure 5 Portion of the 1876 Gray & Davis atlas. Figure 6 Portion of the 1903 USGS. Figure 7 Portion of the County Soil Survey. LIST Or PHOTOGRAPHS Photo 1 Looking northeast at house 2 from road. Photo 2 Looking northeast at house 4. Photo 3 Looking east at auto/mechanical dump . Photo 4 Looking west from near ST 106. G INTRODUCTION l Between October 5 and November 12, 2007, TRACKER -Archaeology Services, Inc. conducted a Phase IA documentary study and a Phase TB archaeological survey for the proposed Adams Fairacre Farm subdivision in Hughsonville, Town of Wappingers, Dutchess County, New York. The purpose of the Phase IA documentary study was to determine the prehistoric and historic potential of the project area for the recovery of archaeological remains. The Phase IA was implemented by a review of the original and current environmental data, archaeological site files, other archival literature, maps, interviews, and documents. The prehistoric and historic site file search was conducted utilizing the resources of the New York State Historic Preservation Office in Waterford, New York. Various historic web sites were queried via the internet to review any pertinent site information. These investigations have been conducted in accordance with the standards set forth by the New York Archaeological Council and the New York State Historic Preservation Office. The Phase IB survey provided actual evidence for the presence or absence of any archaeological sites within the property through ground surface and subsurface field testing.. The entire property is about. 12.5 acres inclusive with steep slopes and. wetlands. The project area (APE) consists of approximately 8 acres minus the wetlands and steep slopes_ The property is bounded to the west by Old Post Road, and to the remaining sides by private properties. The investigation was completed by TRACKER -Archaeology Services, Inc. of Monroe, New York. Prehistoric and historic research was conducted by Alfred G. Cammisa, M.A. Field work was conducted by field director, Alexander Padilla, B.A., and field technician Michael Barrett, Kelly Foxworthy, B.A., r and Kristin Swanton, B.A. Report preparation was,by Alfred Cammisa, Felicia Cammisa, B.A_, and Alexander Padilla. The work was performed for Morris Associates, Poughkeepsie, New York. ENVIRONI4ENT ° Geolocr The study areais located in the southeast portion, of New York State in the southeast part of Dutchess County. This region of .New York lies on the edge 1 of the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province near the interface of the New England Upland -Hudson Highlands. This province, also known as the Newer Appalachians, extends from Lake Champlain to Alabama. It passes as a narrow } lowland belt between the New England Uplands (Taconic Mountains and Hudson Highlands) to the east and the Appalachian Plateau (Catskill and Shawangunk Mountains) and Adirondack Mountains to the west. The characteristic topography is a succession of parallel valleys and ridges trending roughly in a northeasterly direction. This is a region of sedimentary rocks which 1 E. 0 i were easily eroded and subjected to folding or bedding of the rock layers. The eastern limit of the Ridge and Valley Province is a broad, well-defined valley, 300 to 600 feet above sea level, known as the Great Valley. In the vicinity of Ellenville, the Great Valley is called the Wallkill Valley (Schuberth 1968: cover map, 16-18; Tsachsen et al 2000: 4, 53-54; New York - New Jersey Trail Conference 1998: cover map). Soils and Topography Soils on the project area consist of: Name Soil Color Texture Slope Drain- Landform Horizon %. age Depth in (cm) Dutchess- A=0-8 DkBr rocky 1-6 well glacial Cardigan, (0-20) SiLo till rocky, undulating B-8--17 Ybr (-43) B=17-28 DkYbr (-71) ( Faber 2002: Map 19; pgs . b'/). KEY: Shade: Lt=Light, Dk=Dark, V=Very, P=Pale Color: Br -Brown, Blk=Black, Gry=Gray, Gbr=Gray Brown, StBr-Strong Brown, Rbr=Red Brown, Ybr= Yellow Brown, OWOlive Soils: Si -Silt, Lo=Loam, Sa=Sand, C1=Clay Other: Sh=shale, M=Mottle, Gr=Gravelly, Cb=cobbles, /=or Elevations on the property range from approximately 236 to 250 feet above mean sea level. Hydrolo_g� Fresh water wetlands are on the property adjacent to the project area (APE) Ponds and fresh water wetlands surround the general vicinity. The project area is also about 2200 feet east from a tributary to Wappingers Creek which drains into the Hudson River. Vegetation The predominant forest community in this area was probably the Oak Hickory. This forest is a nut producing forest with acorns and hickory nuts usually 6 an obvious part of the leaf' litter on the forest floor. The Oak Hickory Forest intermingles with virtually all other .forest types. The northern ° extension of this forest community was also originally called the Oak - Chestnut forest, before the historic Chestnut blight (Kricher 1988:38, 57- 60) . At the time of the Phase IB field work, the property consisted of a grass lawns with houses and wooded areas of walnut, .maple, birch, and undergrowth of briars and popular scrub. F PREHISTORIC POTENTIAL A prehistoric site file search was conducted at the New York State Historic Preservation Office. The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were recorded: MYSM Sites NYSHPO Sites Distance from ,APE ft (m) Site Description 02119.000029 1126 (3694) Silvestri Site Assessing the known environmental and prehistoric data, we can summarize the following points: Fresh water wetlands are on the property adjacent to the project area (APE). Ponds and fresh water wetlands surround the general vicinity. The project area is also about 2200 feet east from a tributary to Wappingers Creek. -The project area contains level terrain with rocky, well drained soils. -A prehistoric site is nearby the project area. b In our opinion, the study area has an above average potential for the 'recovery of prehistoric sites. The type of site encountered could be a procurement/processing site most likely from the Woodland or Archaic Periods. HISTORIC POTENTIAL Seventeenth Century At the time of European contact and settlement, the study area was probably occupied by the Wappingers. These peoples were likely the main branch and/or clan or village of the large Wappinger tribe. This group lived north of the E Highlands within Dutchess County in the vicinity of Wappingers and Fishkill (Ruttenber 1992:77-84; Becker 1993:18-19; Hearne Brothers nd:wall map; Bolton e 1975:chart). 9 Population estimates for the Wappingers are 400 individuals. The Wappingers are described by Becker (1993:18) as foragers. Route 9 may have been an Indian foot trail (Fishkill 2006; see Cammisa 2003:6). b The town population in the early part of this century was about 8000 (Town of Wappingers 2003). Eighteenth Century By about the middle of the century the Wappingers population had been severely depleted (Town of Wappingers 2003). Nineteenth Century In 1847 a post office was established in Hughsonville (Town of Wappingers 2003) 3 I", A The 1850 Sydney map depicts no structures on or immediately adjacent to the project area. Structures are nearby along Post Road (Route 9) (Figure 3). The 1858 Gillette map shows 2 structures nearby but not immediately adjacent or on the project area (Figure 4). The 1876 Gray and Davis atlas depicts a structure on the project area and others adjacent to the project area (Figure 5) In 1880 there were 5 churdhes, 2 brick school houses, 3 hotels, a print -works, a cotton and comb factory, a newspaper, and a bank .(Town of Wappingers 2003). Twentieth Century By 1900 the town population was 13,016 (Sullivan 2006:3). The 1903 U.S.G.S. depicts no structures on or adjacent to the project area (Figure 6} By 1910 the towns population was 827 and by 1920 it was 844 (Sullivan 1927). An historic site file search was conducted at the New York.State Historic Preservation Office. The search included a 1 mile radius around the study area. The following sites were recorded: 14YSK Sites NYSSPO Sites Distance from Site Description API: .f t W 02719.000030 482 (1581) White Gates Foundation Site Prior to 1850 02719.000031 560 (1837) White Gates Midden Site 1860s? Assessing the known environmental and historic data, we can summarize the following points: -Fresh water wetlands are on the property adjacent to the project area (APE). Ponds and fresh water wetlands surround the general vicinity. The project area is also about 2200.feet east from a tributary to Wappingers Creek. -The project area contains level terrain with rocky, well drained soils. -According to 2 historic MDS's, structures were nearby the project area, One map shows a structure on the project area and others adjacent to it while the most recent map shows no structures on or adjacent to it. In our opinion, the project parcel has a moderate to higher than average potential for the recovery of European -American historic sites, depending on whether there is an historic house on the property. 9 r FIELD METHODS Walkover Covered ground terrain was reconnoitered at about 7.5 to 15 meter intervals, or less, to observe for any above ground .features, such as berms, rock configurations, or depressions, which might be evidence .for a prehistoric or historic site. Photographs were taken of the project area. Ground surface with good visibility (70%-100%) was walked -over at 3 to 5 meter intervals. Shovel Testing Shovel tests were excavated at about 15 to 7.5 meter intervals across the project area. Each shovel test measured about 30 to 40 cm. in diameter and was dug into the underlying subsoil (B horizon) 10 to 20 cm. when possible. All soils were screened through 1/4 inch wire mesh and observed for artifacts. All shovel tests (ST's) were mapped on the project area map at this time. Soils'stratigraphy was recorded according to texture and color. Soil color was matched against the Munsell color chart for soils. Notes on ST stratigraphy and other information was transcribed on field forms and in a notebook. FIELD RESULTS Field testing of the project corridor included the excavation of 132 shovel tests. No prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered. 9 Four houses with associated sheds and garages are on the project area. Three of the houses appear to be middle twentieth century. One house (House 2 on Figure 2) may be older although only a cement block foundation can be seen. The area around this house was shovel tested at 25 foot intervals where possible. Four artifacts recovered include: ST 4, an aluminum dog tag with the inscription "NYS AGR & MKTS 28906361", ( ST 16, blue decorated porcelain sherd, ST 69, Jackfield-type ceramic sherd, ST 131, 2 square nails. ST 16 and 131 are 100 feet apart and ST 69 about 300 feet away. Stratigraphy Stratigraphy across the project corridor consisted of: A/O horizon - 0 to 4 cm. thick of leaf litter, root mat, and humus. A horizon - 4 to 27 cm, thick of 10YR4/3 brown gravelly silty loamy. B horizon - up to 10 to 20 cm. dug into of 10YR5/6 yellow brown gravelly silty loam. 67 b CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon topographic characteristics and proximity to prehistoric sites, the property was assessed as having a higher than average potential for encountering prehistoric sites. Based upon topographic characteristics and proximity to an historic MDS, the property was assessed as having a moderate to higher than average potential for encountering European -American historic sites. During the course of the archaeological field survey, 232 ST`s were excavated. No prehistoric artifacts or features were encountered. One historic artifact, a kaolin pipestem, was recovered. No historic features were encountered. No further work is therefore recommended. BIBLIOGRAPHY Becker, Marshall Joseph 1993 The Lenape and Other "Delawarean" Peoples at the time of European Contact: Populations Estimates Derived from Archaeological and Historical sources, in Journal of the New York State Archaeological Association, #105 Spring. Bolton, Reginald Pelham 1975 New York City in Indian Possession. Museum of the American Indian Heye Foundation, NY. Cammisa, Alfred G. 2003 Phase I Archaeological Investigation for the proposed Cluain Mor Estates Nelsonville, Town of Philipstown Putnam County, New York. 9 TRACKER -Archaeology Services 4253. Ms. on file with Town of Philipst own. Hasbrouck, Frank 1909 The History of Dutchess County New York. S.A. Matth.ieu, N.Y. Kricher, John C. and Gordon Morison 1988 The Peterson Field Guide Series: Eastern Forests of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. E Lenik, Edward J. 1993 Stage IA and Stage IB Cultural Resources survey of the proposed Baxtertown Heights subdivision, Town of Fishkill, Dutchess County, New York. Sheffield Archaeological Consultants. Ruttenber, E.M. 1992 Indian Tribes of Hudson's River - to I700. Hope Farm Press, Saugerties, New York. D Schuberth, Christopher J. 1968 The Geology of New York State and Environs. New York: x Natural .History Press. a C Smith, James H. 1882 1683 History of Dutchess County, New York. D. Mason & co., N.Y. Smith, Philip Smith 1877 General History of Dutchess County. from 1609 to 1886. Published by author, Pawling, NY. Town of Wappingers 2003 www.townofwappingers.us/. Mans Hearne Brothers not dated Indians of New York. Earth Science Projection Map. Hearne Brothers, Michigan. 1850 Duichess County, NY. Sydney, J.C., C.E. 1858 Dutchess County, NY. John E. Gillette, PA. 18'76 Illustrated Atlas of Dutchess County, NY. G.W. Gray & Son and A.M. Davis, PA. United States Geologic Survey 1967 Wappingers, New York quadrangle map, 7.5 minute series. 1903 Poughkeepsie; New York quadrangle map, 15 minute series 7 i APPENDIX 1 w w Figure 1 { ✓ �;� '' j, s Portion of the Wappingers Fails, NY USGS —1000 �fProject OE area WNW '"� '� � ��j�� ���� � � � e' •� , '.. ♦ ��; e "rj"'w' '`�`"'""*'�-.. 4�r ��7 {{ i�~� ��a A�;..,,:,...,,.,,.y,',m�-,� ! 1►, L sem}' € s F r dr""`� �` Aft i �., � � P�`, c � � �''r .. i�5. � ,, r� ,� R * , �,. :: �'� � ti. �. � r � �` ',✓,tj �s'✓•r h .r+.^�"'"`" N, r p g lb 41 fin .��p :�� �.�'w �i # � � i � �{ • "r'sL � �� °� ! s_ � �� r$� F �si k` } s �� SIF. 3.7 �., 7 p a ., a� . p �-,� !�' ` � � Y � -p f•. � � ,: r s� :` '+,. _ 3�,ti x � �r..- � �" • ! � � y"s�s��� tt t r� � '� � k 'c a: _k .1 �Edi �' r �' •{ � � � r - r r:r �� l' rf,r a' W fi� �: { 3 r . 6 s � +` s � i ,r. � d f ,,', * �''�I-t 'r � a r k k � r � • � �f �'`�^`f � '� a a � � � � r RSR � `� � 1 S ,. FF fit tA ,. ! KE • i. �? e�� ` F 3 �• ji{� �. , tr rn(mrroy s en4 es, Inc. I a�rr41 ro ,SCALE: 1 INCH - 95 FEET Y X95' 47.5' 0 95' 190.1 / 3 30/ r FIGURE 2: LOCATION V PHOTO ANGLE • NEGATIVE SHOVEL FEST UX K S nW SHOVE[. TEST W\aMA 00CM ARWACr. - - - - LIMITS OF STORAGE DUMP PROJECT NAME: ADAMS FAIRACRES JR4CKER Archae4arSen&e In& `!If, y�rrXifi�ft4r�4r�tiy E�f s ,71 No gAwqr4r Y Figure 4 r` iv- Portion of the 1858 Gillette map V.I. PhiffW I j x . �r,•r,�rt, a,rdom, J Greg 40107 d ^ � . ► , . `. .��C.-d. l"l� Com. . t 1'Pl�f�� ' V 1 • Oil l Project )ran area L. Gun A7eec7�-Kl cerntcr- t'. Yda Wim. • t �f TF, r Awto, _ I Ir �!wTl ' ' -' •'� �.. T �S { alt A",� ��•J RAJ � �Ft' , Y. '. ,�F � � � � � _, i ,'r r , ��' „ .;, ' ' ..►� � '. � . � ``y Q -to- r , { i . ' ...,,s' j� t ;�E ..h!�� .•zt� i �;�;' �� j'c,�:T�i7't�rL7� �+ i I fi H � � ,s� N Figure 5 s Portion of the 1 876 Gray & Days map .. ; it WO AT Art { •, a ' �i �.; � �• I�cL7� Tom..-�K'� 1.�� [ �� �`E 1 .�, -. 5•. � � ; � ,..,-_`��E � •; • area ,`silk 7J V Y. r F { i N Figure 6 Portion of the 1903 USGS it-�� rJp,rA y�,.� \ 5� r ,i. •^ J � � •..,, I 1 J \ ,r} �ffyy `3 y - - \ r �/ 1 � J ifF� f �E Y f �'f Y'�/r� 1 �� `�1 ' _ / � ,� , jti•�; { gg 1 } - � ; � � ; �;� ��'� J �%!� ' � �� JAI _ � �; ���� �� ✓�;1 Project i/` r �✓' f '%'� , ' area 4 .rte f f r! _ r ; i I Figure 7 N A irtion of the County Soil Survey Y Uw VW aa, BoC yz� D)(0 BeB D vvB p 8 Z k U e P Bee wC w A 4"', N pz Ur tj MY Project U D. W J V PvC area . . . ........ Bee f Ue LAIC:, PzA Bel) 4�4 U.r HoF T ..Ca G Cr at pZB D kqC PzA Ue w Ca O�C Ud Ho W, r ... :.- • F �� :.�, �;4i�+ aye, '� - f� 9 �,�e _ ��.fEp, �� - q r. ��e�d 4 ! d�f���AE rt�1 d � i�tl �� '� � �er•. �� �_� �� ��r S 'ON � r � i•' a r:�•���,1 N .- ale Y � 3� '16�-"' r�a'[.�: ,.+•�` �. �.i,y� el � f J�q� �A i��� � . f —, l , -• — � ! e �. y. --g � _dam f1E rt 4 qCa_ a ;j . � L u - _Inx . IL I „ � � e � -'�+ ,a t i � ,? , ice,' . � � � a f t • � : ; 4 ������a a�a p � kd,.6 :Eti� -�v iAi4�''��. i �,' _— .•`a �`ts ���,��'}, -K .••-;_ _ i r�x '� �k d.'E2 �'-� .+I=- f ''.� god r [.A Yao•, ' ?! eie�r '.1 ♦ F"�4"*e % .t: ebb r ter. ° iot i t "SS 4 r N.: �r rai '� i�..y "'i�• Li �Tm 3i1 =fi .+y1�'y^ -'Y� A;Qr" I.5�iL � - I -a" C'4r dV' r 'a 7 w r� � r�a ' i•'k^5 � r � a ti +>- ��� ej ' o j ]f• �3• t� gip, d � -j-- r q�. _- � - ° .. - 0I0l:�lI[o■AIo oil RlW*%WAM I'll* .r.lm. �1e iot i t "SS 4 r N.: �r rai '� i�..y "'i�• Li �Tm 3i1 =fi .+y1�'y^ -'Y� A;Qr" I.5�iL � - I -a" C'4r dV' r 'a 7 w r� � r�a ' i•'k^5 � r � a ti +>- ��� ej ' o j ]f• �3• t� gip, d � -j-- r q�. _- � - ° .. - 0I0l:�lI[o■AIo oil RlW*%WAM I'll* .r.lm. 1 1. �nr.�u��■��aru�x Pit House 4 0 � . 1 1. �nr.�u��■��aru�x Pit House 4 0 A,%%6 � 1 0• 1 `' `►�' C% 1 Lam„ „,°` � ', � '� L�eA �r � ►�� �r a: , ' d e ._ .y 1 1 -d'... 4•.4. J R .4 C4 � �: /� � � i.. � �^ • - ' 1 — h1' - - .. �,` ' L . � o-. �. t 4 r •�� � r 4 •. . _ wf e� _ �n�t5 4, J"One re 0 10 1 Arkli III to K: ro R"I 1 ro UN iF'li1NY.ltell1111• - .m ' - ., ]. �,` � , `; ._ - t _ ' .� "` a - � , ✓ Ir _ ��NN°�'�Y2i. i_.n ��.; ..�Y 1 .� .. ;. - --'i �'i ... fa•.. -<1 1 ft X - - ' Ep , - J"One re 0 10 1 Arkli III to K: ro R"I 1 ro UN iF'li1NY.ltell1111• $kaw tri r a.�? 1 S� flw'� tl �.. i � 'i►p%� C�� yS"� C'� 'ki � tv rf kl-,�.�/�y A ;4..w L rr ' _'i�,a;;'="ys... � .a 'r i t L,a-,��'�'`"r'„` -• 'g.-g"Tif,�s �'"'�'� ' i I i � � � � 1. r ..5%' .au'•1tic',,5�,.�/ #` ir��.y7 �a ✓ Nani-• - '�e�iC '` N'�. 5, rl 10 g�. � �.. � 'w 4 v ' k '^ s furs � - � � ➢i . R z, q Lb wr a 19z A •b# ti ,� 3 _ ¢ � a- '� a ei+- 4� .._� !,k '` a' r'��` . - �0 Ql... •L F t I J us 0 r •It I 1�� 1111,40mat m tore R z, q Lb wr a 19z A I 1�� 1111,40mat m tore APPENDIX 2 E SHOVEL TESTS STP Lv Depth(Cm) Texture Color Hor. Comments 1 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-18 GrSiLO 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 18-38 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 2 1 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 2-20 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A brick frag. discarded 3 20-30 GrSiLo 1OYR5/6 B NCM 3 1 0-3 rootmat,feaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-2.4 GrSiLo 1OYR4/3 A NCM 3 24-37 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 4 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-24 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A dog tag. 3 24-34 GrSiLo, 10YR5/6 B NCM 5 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-20 GrMo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20-32'GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 6 1 0 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 0-24 G.rSiLo 1OYR4/3 A coal dis. 3 24-34 G.rSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 7 1. 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 2-22 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A slag,coal dis. 3 22-32 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM. 8 1. 0-2 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O 'NCM 2. 2-10 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 10 -bedrock 9 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 4-17 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 17-27 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 10 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-23 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 23-34 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 11 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 4-20 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20-30 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 12 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-24 GrSiLo lOYR4/3 A NCM 3 24-34 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 13 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-28 ?GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 28-39 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM. 29 1 0-3 10YR5/6 2 3-20 GrSiLo 3 20 -rocks 30 1 0-3 GrSiLo 2 3-22 10YR5/6 3 22 --rocks 31 1 0--1 NCM 2 1-23 A 3 23-36 32 1 0-3 2 3-19 3 19-26 33 1 0-1 2 1=20 3 20-31 34 1 0-2 2 2-19 3 19-21 35 1 0-1 2 1-6 3 6 -bedrock 36 1 0-2 2 2-9 3 9-19 37 1 0 2 0-21 3 21-31 38 1 0-3 2 3-16 3 16.25 39 1 0-3 2 3-18 3 18-29 40 1 0-3 2 3-20 3 20 -rocks 41 1 0-2 2 2-19 3 19-29 42 1 0-3 2 3-18 3 18-37 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo IOYR4/3 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLO 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus NCM GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus NCM GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus NCM GrSiLo 10YR4/3 rootmat,leaves,humus GrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 rootmat,leaves,humus EGrSiLo 10YR4/3 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 A/0 NCM A NCM A/0 NCM A NCM A/0 NCM A NCM B NCM A/0 NCM A NCM B NCM A/0 NCM A plastic dis. B NCM A/0 NCM A plastic dis. B NCM A/O ' NCM A NCM A/O NCM A aluminum foil dis. B NCM A/O NCM A NCM B NCM A/0 NCM A NCM B NCM A/0 NCM A plaster dis. B NCM A/O NCM A mortar,wi.ndow glass dis. . A/0 NCM A NCM B NCM' A/O NCM A NCM B NCM 58 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-12 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 12-25 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 59 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3--12 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 12-23 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 60 1 0.-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0. NCM 2 3-7 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 7-17 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 61 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-7 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 7--19 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 62 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 4-14 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 14-29 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 63 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-19 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 19-30 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 64 1 0--3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-23 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 23-33 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 65 1 0--4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 4-18 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 18-22,rocks GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 66 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-7 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 7-,18 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 67 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 .3-20 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20--31 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 68 1 Q-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-7 'GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 7-10,rocks GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 69 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-26 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A ceramic 3 26-38 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 70 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-5 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 5--15 GrSiLo 1.QYR5/6 B NCM 71 1 0 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM Q -bedrock 72 1 0-3 r rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-5 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 5-20 GrSiLo 10YR5/6. B NCM 88 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-12 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 12 -bedrock 89 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-16 GrSiLo 1OYR4/3 A NCM 3 16-28 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM .90 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-7 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 7 -rocks GrSiLo lOYR5/6 B NCM 91 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-14 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 14-25 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 92 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-14 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 14-26 GrSiLo IOYR5/6 B NCM 93 1 0-3 rootmat,leave.s,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-17 GrSiLo 10YR4/3. A NCM 3 17-30 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 94 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 4-12 GrSiLo IOYR4/3 A NCM 3 12-28 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 95 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-11 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 11-30 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 96 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-12 GrSiLo ]OYR4/3 A NCM 3 12-13,rocks GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 97 1- 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-16 GrSiLo 10YR4/3. A NCM 3 16-18,rocks GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 98 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-20 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20-31 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 99 1 0-1 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-16 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCk 3 16-27 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 1O0 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-21 GrSiLo lOYR4/3 A NCM 3 21-32 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 101 1 0 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 O -bedrock 102 1 0--3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-12 (GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 12-25 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 118 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-6 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 6-18 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 119 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-10 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 10-21 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 120 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-6. GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 6-17 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 121 1 .0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-6 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 6-16 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 122, 1 0-4 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 4-8 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 8-20 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 123 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-5 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 5-15 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 124 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-20 GrSiLo. 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 20-32 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 125 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-17 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 17-30 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 126 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM g 2 3-19 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM a 3 19-31 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 127 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2 3-6. GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 6 -rocks 128 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 2 3-12 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 12-25 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B 'NCM 129 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/0 NCM 2---- ----3-2-2 3 22-35 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM 130 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM w 2 3-26 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A NCM 3 26-38 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM j 131 1 0-3 rootmat,leaves,humus A/O NCM 3-30 GrSiLo 10YR4/3 A sq nails, wire nails dis. Plastic button ° 3 30-40 GrSiLo 10YR5/6 B NCM R APPENDIX 3• Map Documented Structures (NDS) Location Map On, or Owner Eco -niche Comments Immediately Adjacent to Project Area east side of 1850 neither na farming Figure 3 OldPost (but community Rd., just nearby) north of MacFarlane Rd. same as 1858 same as na farming Figure 4 above above community same as 1876 on & Fowler farming Figure 5 above immediately (on) community adjacent Wooddin (adjacent) same as 1903 neither na rural Figure 6 above A r, Wetland Establishment Report Adams Fairacre Farms Route 9 Town of Wappinger Dutchess County, NY July 29, 2008 Revised October 17, 2008 Prepared by: Michael Nowicki Ecological Solutions LLC 1248 Southford Road Southbury, CT 06488 (203) 9104716 FILE COPY OCT 2,-0 2008 ,Adams Fairacre Fanns Town of Wnppinger, NY Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 4 Table 2.1-1 Post -Development Wetland Areas ............................. .. Southern Wetland A Federal Jurisdictional Wetland .............. 5 Wetland Mitigation .................................................. Acres.......................... . 2.0 ESTABLISHMENT JUSTIFICATION ........................................ 2.1 Site Design and Minimization of Impacts............................................................ 6 2.2 Methodology........................................................................ ................................. 6 2.3 Seeding and Establishment Planting.................................................................... 7 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ......................... 3.1 Prescription of Vegetative Cover Types............................................................... 8 4.0 WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT SITE SELECTION....................................................10 5.0 BASELINE INFORMATION ............11 ............... 5.1 Hydrology of the Establishment Areas............................................................... 11 5.2 Soil Preparations and Vegetative Establishment ................................................ 11 5.3 Diversity and Proposed Locations of Vegetative Cover Types .......................... 12 Table 5.3-1 Restorative Seeding Components .............. 14 Ecological Solutions, LLC Adorns Fairracre Farms Town of Wiappinger, NY Page 3 6.0 WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT WORK PLAN............................................................15 6.1 Construction Schedule........................................................................................ 15 17 6.2 Transplanting Techniques.................................................... .......................... 7.0 SITE PROTECTION...........................................................................................................18 8.0 MONITORING PLAN AND REPORT..........................................................................19 9.0 MAINTENANCE AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................. 20 9.1 Fall Supplemental Seeding................................................................................. 20 9.2 Cuttings for Supplemental Establishment......................................................... 20 9.3 Nuisance Vegetation Control Plan...................................................................... 20 9.4 Map Existing Locations of Problem Species....................................................... 21 9.5 Containment and Eradication Methods.............................................................. 21 Ecological Solutions, LLQ Adams Fairacre Fams Page 4 Town of Wappinger, NY 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Applicant, Adams Fairacre Farms, is seeking authorization for the discharge of fill material to a total 0.30 acres of Federal wetland from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and 33 CFR Part 330 under Nationwide Permit 39. The reauthorized Nationwide Permit program became effective on March 19, 2007, The Applicant is also seeking authorization from the Town of Wappinger for the placement of fill material into 0.57 acres of Town regulated wetland that includes the 0.30 acres of federal wetland impact areas. The Applicant, Adams Fairacre Farms, proposes the construction of a 75,800 square foot Grocery Store and Garden Center and approximately 45,000 square feet of outdoor Plant Display Areas and associated features including 365 parking spaces, utilities, stormwater management basins, and. grading on property located on NYS Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. The Applicant is proposing to impact 0.30 acres of federal wetland included in the 0.57 acres of Town regulated wetland impact. The impact to federal and Town wetland is attributed to the provision of parking spaces, and loading areas behind the proposed Adams Fairacre Farms Market and associated grading. Federal and Town wetland mitigation will amount to 0.57 acres and will be constructed at the southern or federal jurisdictional wetland areas and northern wetland areas. The isolated northern wetland will be connected by a swale to the southern jurisdictional wetland as a result of the proposed development. The northern wetland will become jurisdictional as a result of the project. I cologicnl Solutions, Ll Adams Fairacre Farms Town of Wappinger, NY Page 5 Table 2.1-1 Post -Development Wetland Areas Southern Wetland A 0.30 Federal Parking Spaces Federal Jurisdictional Wetland 0.57 Town includes 0.30 Federal Northern Wetland B 0.27 Town only Truck Access Non -Jurisdictional Wetland Total 1 0.57 Total Federal and Town 0.57I Forest, shrub Wetland Mitigation Areas Ecological Solations, LLC Adams Fairacre Fans Town of Wappi ager, NY Page 6 2.0 ESTABLISHMENT JUSTIFICATION 2.1 Site Design and Minimization of Impacts The proposed layout for the development and associated features sought to minimize encroachments into Federal and Town regulated wetlands however this was difficult due to the site plan requirements for an Adams Fairacre Farms Market and the position of the wetlands on the property. The proposed project is designed to provide a suitable layout for the development that meets the Town of Wappinger Building and Highway Code and meets the Phase II Stormwater Regulations for treating stormwater from impervious surfaces prior to discharge. The site design minimizes wetland disturbances to the maximum extent practicable. To compensate for the loss of wetland areas and functional capacity, the Applicant is committed to the establishment of 0.57 acres of wetland in four areas on the parcel and wetland buffer mitigation in the form of a planted stormwater basin that will essentially function as a wetland and thereby further increase the size of the primary resource. The purpose of this report is to document the criteria upon which the total wetland establishment has been designed and provide guidance to the contractor during implementation of the plan. The ultimate goal is to produce a method to create a viable long-term (permanent) wetland community from an areas that is lightly wooded and contains debris including car parts. The work described herein includes the compensatory establishment of a total (Town and Federal) of approximately 0.57 acres of forested, shrub, and wetland meadow. The accompanying Wetlands Disturbance and Mitigation Plan provided by Morris Associates describe the techniques and materials proposed to establish the water table in the establishment wetland, transplant substrate material, and establish wetland vegetation. 2.2 Methodology The compensatory wetland establishment plan is based on the proposed establishment areas being similar in spatial relation and existing features, and the following principles: ■ The water table in the establishment wetlands must be maintained near the finished grade; ■ The establishment areas must not be flooded for prolonged periods of time as a result of significant rainstorms; Ecologi.caI Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farms Toe ofWappinger, NY P ge 7 Towne ■ The areas must be planted with sufficient hydrophytic vegetation, seed, and, / rootstock to allow wetland communities to emerge within a reasonable time period. 2.3 Seeding and Establishment Planting The final design of the establishment areas strives to create edge habitat around the existing wetland type and watercourse. Rootstock from the proposed disturbance areas will be placed at regular intervals throughout the establishment areas without additional destruction of the existing wetland used for rootstock. The use of an excavator will allow removal of select areas and preservation of other areas, such that the rootstock removal .areas have vegetation remaining and that existing wetland alteration is minimized. In addition, erosion controls and orange snow fencing will surround those wetland areas, which will not be disturbed. The rootstock is to be transplanted using a large excavator that will remove blocks of rootstock after the top growth has been cut and pruned back. The material will then be transported to the planting areas and put in place using pay -loaders. All slash from pruning of the rootstock areas is to be chipped and stockpiled. The areas of rootstock source are to be semi -circular in nature. This method is considered feasible due to the entry into the wetland with heavy equipment for the construction of the proposed roads. Such equipment, most likely, cannot traverse the wetland without damage to existing vegetation. The proposed method would create semi -circles located over the proposed roads. Wetland plantings will be installed after the placement of the rootstock substrate material in the establishment areas. This bedding material will keep soil moisture high during summer dry periods when establishment of vegetation is critical. Ecological Solutions, LL, Adams Fairacre Fame Town ofWappinger, NY Page 8 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS The design of an interconnected system of existing wetland with forested, shrub and wet meadow wetlands is intended so that the existing wetlands serve as a "regeneration nucleus" around which a wide range of vegetative cover types could be established. This layout was selected to increase the amount of "edge habitat" adjacent to the undisturbed portions of the existing wetland, and to exploit the predicted hydrologic condition of the establishment areas. Generally, wildlife populations thrive when edge habitat between cover and food types is increased. Increased edge equates to more resources being available to an animal in a smaller areas. The placement of rootstock in the establishment areas will provide an ecotonal microhabitat of value to certain wildlife species, while the wooded swamp interface with shrubs will provide two additional ecotones or "edge habitat". By maximizing the amounts and types of these ecotonal areas both the colonization of the areas by local wildlife and the natural successional formation of shrub swamp and wooded swamp habitats will be considerably accelerated. Wildlife usage within the proposed wetland establishment areas will be documented and included in the wetland monitoring reports that will be submitted to the Town and USACE at the end of each growing season from establishment for a duration of a minimum of five years. Soil samples will be taken within each establishment area and described in each monitoring report to document hydric soil conditions. A plan to irrigate the proposed establishment areas from the existing watercourse will maximize the availability of surface water resources to the establishment plantings, and other seeded areas of the establishment zone if it is required. 3.1 Prescription of Vegetative Cover Types The proposed establishment areas are designed to maximize the community structural and floristic diversity of the compensatory establishment areas when juxtaposed with the existing stream/ vegetated wetland system. The proposed combination of shrub and wooded swamp is expected to enhance the bio -diversity and the wildlife habitat functions of the entire wetland ecosystem. Prescriptions for supplemental seeding of those areas not receiving establishment plantings, or rootstock transplants from the existing wetland disturbance areas, is based Ecological Solations, LL Adams Fairacre Fanns Town ofWappinger, NY Page 9 on published data regarding the water depth tolerances of indigenous wetland species', as well as the commercial availability of seed of those species. Wherever possible, seed of indigenous wetland species and genera were prescribed, and potentially problematic, weedy species also were deliberately not prescribed for the establishment areas. The establishment effort involves two major components: one to produce the required hydrological regime, and the other to establish wetland terrain including placement of rootstock, seed, and wetland plantings throughout the establishment areas. The establishment lines have been adjusted to take advantage of the natural contours and proximity to the existing wetlands. Successional wetland cover types other than the wooded swamp, such as shrub plantings will provide stability, biological diversity, interspersion of cover types, increased wildlife habitat, and provide the potential for increased structural/ floristic complexity, and functional value of the establishment/ existing wetland ecosystem. 1 Southern Tier Consulting, Inc - Wetland Plant Catalog 2008-2009, Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Faira.cre Fanns Town of Wappinger, NY page 10 4.0 WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT SITE SELECTION The proposed wetland establishment areas were selected due to its current low quality of existing vegetation in this areas and large amounts of debris currently stored there. Currently the establishment areas is dominated by pioneer and second growth forest species. The establishment areas will also take advantage of the existing red maple swamp and watercourse system to which they will be attached. Hydrology - a driving factor in establishment design - is evident in the inundated/ saturated condition of the surrounding soil and constant flow of the watercourse. The northern isolated wetland will be connected to the southern wetland via a swale as a result of the proposed project. The northern wetland will therefore have a direct hydrologic surface link and will become jurisdictional after the project is completed. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre :Farms Talon ofWappinger, NY Page II 5.0 BASELINE INFORMATION 5.1 Hydrology of the Establishment Areas The field investigation revealed that organic matter approximately 4 inches deep exists within the establishment areas. Beneath this layer exists a (2' - 4') layer of silty clay. Groundwater was observed in the test pit of the establishment in quantities that are considered sufficient to support hydrophytic vegetation and the establishment of hydric soils. The existing wetland and inter -connecting stream will serve as a "regeneration nucleus" from which vegetative cover can expand radially by vegetative reproduction into the proposed establishment areas. Since different plant species within the same wetland may often exhibit a wide range of moisture requirements and flooding tolerances, the proposed elevation ranges will provide a micro -topographic moisture gradient conducive to high species diversity. The proposed layout of the establishment areas is designed to facilitate construction and sedimentation control efforts by minimizing excavation and grading requirements. Piezometers or staff gages will be utilized in each wetland establishment area to conduct long term monitoring (minimum 5 year period) of the hydrology of each area once completed. 5.2 Soil Preparations and Vegetative Establishment The test pit confirmed the presence of mineral soil horizons at varying depths in the establishment areas so that the existing soil fertility is expected to be adequate for the establishment and growth of the transplanted rootstocks, wetland plantings, and seed. Organically rich transplanted rootstock will be incorporated into the surface of the establishment areas and will provide increased fertility and water holding capacity essential for the establishment of wetland communities. Additional soil amendments .are not expected to be required, since the proposed vegetative cover types will thrive in a wide range of soil conditions, with pH values from slightly acidic to neutral. Baseline soil analyses for the establishment areas and adjacent wetland, however, will be indispensable in the monitoring and assessment phase of the relative success or failure of the establishment effort. The combination of existing wetland with shrub swamp establishment areas is expected to ensure vegetative establishment and long-term survival, even under summer Ecological Solutions, LLC Adinns Fairacre Farins Tmon ofWappinger, NY Page 22 conditions. The design of this system will maximize surface water availability to } . transplanted rootstock, wetland plantings, and areas to be seeded with herbaceous wetland species. The finished grades of the establishment areas will create an increasing moisture gradient from the existing uplands through the establishment areas that will improve chances for establishment of a diverse wetland community. These finished grades also will make use of seasonal fluctuations in water elevations, which are widely recognized as crucial to seed germination and seedling establishment of both woody and herbaceous wetland plant species. The remainder of the terrain will be seeded with a mixture of herbaceous, wet meadow species in order to stabilize soils and establish a perennial wetland vegetative community. 5.3 Diversity and Proposed Locations of Vegetative Cover Types One major goal of the wetland establishment plan is to maximize the floristic diversity and availability of ecotonal, "edge habitat" for subsequent colonization by wildlife. The strategy to achieve this goal is to enhance the proposed wetland plant species and vegetative cover type diversity by utilizing the rootstock from impacted wetland areas with seeding of commercially available wetland species at appropriate elevations and water depths within the establishment areas. Another objective is to minimize the distances between the proposed vegetative cover types and open water to which access may be needed during periods of summer drought as part of the contingency irrigation plan. Shrub wetlands will be constructed to add "edge habitat" to the existing wetland vegetation. The existing wetland will remain in its current condition. It is expected that even with successful establishment of diverse cover types, their relative patterns and proportions will fluctuate over ecological time due to weather patterns and natural processes. The majority of the proposed wetland areas should develop, ultimately, into a mature forested wetland via an intermediate, shrub swamp successional stage. Supplemental seeding of the establishment areas with wetland seed will stabilize and enhance the vegetative establishment of wetland communities in areas that will not be planted with wetland plants. The supplemental seeding prescriptions of the establishment areas, presented below in Table 6.3-1, are based on the site-specific ecological suitability of commercially available seed of indigenous wetland plant species. As is discussed in detail in the following sections, these plants provide excellent food and cover resources for waterfowl and other wildlife populations. In addition, wetland plantings available as whole plants, Eaalo&ai Solutions, LLC Adams Rairacre Farms Toxon of Wappinger, NY Page 13 tubers or rhizomes are prescribed for all establishment areas to initiate the colonization process. Emergent establishment areas will be planted with Cyperus esculentus, Echinochloa crus- ag Ilii, Nasturtium o cinale and Peltandra v_irginica, at the seeding rates suggested by the supplier. These plants can survive seasonal periods of surface water draw down and are thus expected to thrive even under a worst-case scenario of prolonged summer drought. Following seeding, used hay bales will be broken up and spread over these establishment areas to enhance micro faunal establishment and thus accelerate the establishment of a food chain. This technique and other aspects of the establishment system and associated wetland vegetation are expected to enhance the overall wildlife habitat value, soil microbial activity, and fertility of the establishment areas. PhaIaris arund^ inacea, a commercially available grass species commonly found in wet meadows was not prescribed due its having become a noxious weed in wetland landscaping projects. It is hoped that the herbaceous wet meadow flora will act as "living mulch" and thus enhance the potential for germination of dormant seeds in the transplanted rootstock soils. Also, seeds that may find their way into these areas from the undisturbed swamp will be provided with suitable conditions for germination. The selection of the proposed seed species, dicotyledons, will serve to minimize the formation of a dense thatch that could otherwise inhibit germination and establishment of all but the most vigorous woody plant seeds. Once established, seedlings of woody species will rapidly overtop their herbaceous counterparts and eventually displace those herbs with high light requirements. Little or no competition for water is expected between these woody and herbaceous components so that they can be expected to complement, rather than to compete, with one another during the early stages of successional formation of the establishment areas. The gradual displacement of these wet meadow species, by shrubs, trees and more shade - tolerant herbs, however, is the natural successional process that is desired for the long- term establishment of a shrub -dominated swamp and, ultimately, a mature forested wetland community. Natural recruitment via seed dispersal into and germination within the establishment areas, from the adjacent portions of the undisturbed wetIand, the transplanted rootstock, and the wetland plantings are expected to contribute to the long term establishment of shrub wetland and wooded wetland segments over successional time. Baseline floristic data will be used to assess the relative success of the entire establishment project during the five - year monitoring period. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adarns Fairan e Farrns Town ofWappinger, NY Page 14 Table 5.3-1 Restorative Seeding Components COVER TYPE & SPECIESCOMMON NAME Wet Meadow Areas: Agrostis alba Echinochloa crus-gallii Fagopyrum tartaricum Glyceria sp. Lotus corniculatus Nasturtium officinale Polygonum pennsylvanicum Scirpus paludosus Redtop Bentgrass Duck Millet Goose Buckwheat Mannagrass Birdsfoot Trefoil True Water Cress Giant Smartweed Nutgrass DEPTH RANGE Wet mesic 0-1 foot Wet mesic Wet mesic Wet mesic 2-10 inches Wet mesic Wet mesic RATE Not Given 25-40 lbs./ac. 351bs. / ac Not given S lbs./ac. Not given 20 lbs./ac 25 lbs. / ac Ecological Solutions, LLC Adorns Fairacre Farms Town of GVarpinger, NY Page 15 6.0 WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT WORK PLAN This section includes an outline of the construction schedule and descriptions of the planting techniques. The last portion describes the erosion control plan proposed to control erosion from the site during construction of the establishment areas. 6.1 Construction Schedule This construction schedule is based on estimates to complete the major items of work and outlines the work necessary to complete the establishment work by the spring of 2009. Work includes: ■ Rough grading of establishment areas; ■ Fine grading; ■ Transplanting of wooded rootstock; ■ Planting of all establishment areas; ■ Seeding of all establishment areas. Equipment that will be utilized for work at the establishment areas includes: conventional earth moving equipment including bulldozers, pay loaders, track mounted excavators and dump trucks. The soils being moved include clay. The following is a rough estimate of material to be moved: ■ Rough grade establishment areas 0.57 acres, ■ Spread material (rootstock over bottom of establishment areas approximately 500 cubic yards; ■ Fine grade establishment areas approximately 200 cubic yards. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adorns Faimcre Farms Town of Wappinger, NY Page 16 Grading of Wetland Establishment Areas Approximately 0.57 acres of wetland establishment areas is proposed. Excavation of rough grades are expected to require approximately 500 cubic yards of earth movement at 400 cubic yards/day/dozer (D-8) = 2 dozer days required within the period of October 1 to November 15 or March 1 to Junel. Formulation of the establishment areas after completion of rough grading will require an additional 200 cubic yards of earthwork. This operation should occur immediately behind the rough grading work and in conjunction with the transplanting of the rootstock. Rootstock Over Establishment areas Spread rootstock over approximately 0.57 acres of establishment areas. This will require placement of approximately 500 cubic yards of transferred hydric soil and approximately 2 days of an excavator, a pay -loader, and one dump truck. Since transplanting of the rootstock must occur from October 1 to November 15 or March 1 to June1 the establishment areas must be created in this time period. Also, fine grading will require the use of dozers (D-8). Transplanting,Rootstock Hauling is the limiting factor (vs. loading) in root stock movement. The preparation of the establishment areas also controls, to some degree, the speed of this work. If the operation can move approximately 150 square feet per load, the relocation of 500 square feet will require approximately 3-4 trips. Planting Establishment areas Actual planting of proposed wetland species shall be conducted in the spring of 2009. Delivery and installation of all plant material will require approximately 1-2 weeks depending on the availability of the proposed species and number of laborers used for the planting. Seeding Seeding will occur via hydro -seed technique at approximately two acres/unit/day to cover the establishment areas of 0.57 acres, approximately 1 unit day is required to seed the areas. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farms Town of Wappinger, NY Page ] 7 6.2 Transplanting Techniques A track -mounted excavator that can reach into the existing wetland approximately 45 feet without leaving the proposed road will be utilized. It easily can remove 6 foot x 4 foot strips of rootstock. The rootstock will be cut into shape without major difficulty, although larger shrubs will be removed. The rootstock mass will be loaded immediately into trucks and transported to the establishment areas for transplanting. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adapts Fairacre Fanns Town ofWayyinger, NY Page 18 7.0 SITE PROTECTION Erosion control and earth works are proposed via conventional techniques. The flat condition of the establishment areas will limit runoff velocities and only suspended clay particles are troublesome from an erosion standpoint. The overall plan is outlined as follows: Earthworks ■ Install erosion controls along establishment fronts and all waterways; ■ Along wetland use silt fences; ■ Along waterways use silt fences; ■ Across waterways, for silt traps use silt fences down gradient from work/excavation areas and provide rapid installation of controls to minimize siltation. ■ Over -seed establishment areas with a mixture of wet meadow herbs; Transplant Rootstock ■ Flag perimeter of donor vegetation, parallel to roads and avoiding mature trees, when possible. ■ Trim all woody vegetation to within 12 inches of ground surface. ■ Chip all slash and stockpile for re -spreading over exposed soils of donor areas; ■ Transplant, without delay, rootstock to receiving areas in establishment zone, as intact mats to form checkerboard pattern; Spread wood chips over exposed soils of donor wetland areas; ■ Repeat above steps for each donor areas; ■ Maintain erosion controls as needed. ■ Seed any exposed soils with wet meadow species. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Fauns Town ofWappinger, NY Page 19 8.0 MONITORING PLAN AND REPORT The establishment areas will be monitored for a five-year period after installation of plantings, rootstock, and seed. Mortality rates will be calculated and dead or dying plant material will be replaced. Also, the reasons for the mortality will be examined, and the most likely cause for the loss will be corrected before any further establishment efforts are put forth. In the event that climatic conditions require irrigation of the plantings, rootstock transplants, and seed during the first summer month, the following plan is suggested. With the use of pumps and with the use of portable irrigation/ piping, the plants, rootstock, and seeded areas can be watered via the stream or water truck. Such watering should only be necessary should rainfall deficit and heat index cause drought type conditions in the establishment areas. It is noted that the water table should be only 1 foot below the planting bed surface. This condition in itself should cause the establishment areas not to require irrigation. Minimum irrigation needs are to provide at least 1 inch of rainfall equivalent to the plants every 10 days. Such practice should begin if 1 inch of rain does not fall for 20 days, or if wilting is noticed in the transplants, and be continued for the required period. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farms Torun of Wappinger, NY Page 20 9.0 MAINTENANCE AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Several supplemental techniques to ensure the successful establishment of wetland vegetative cover are summarized briefly in the following discussion. If at the end of one complete growing season, the rootstock, planted, and seeded areas fail to exhibit well- established plant communities, or exhibit patchiness in the patterns of vegetative cover, one or more of the following methods will be considered to supplement the initial vegetation effort. 9.1 Fall Supplemental Seeding If some of the originally planted material from commercial suppliers has become established successfully in certain areas, a second attempt will be made using the same species in areas where establishment had failed. Soil analyses for the under vegetated areas will be performed, and considerations of other ecological factors that may be responsible for the failure also will be performed before re -planting such areas. Any obvious zone patterns, such as failure to survive at certain elevations relative to water levels, may help to "fine tune" the locations and methods for the re -planting. 9.2 Cuttings for Supplemental Establishment A more costly last resort would be to gather stem cuttings early in the growing season from woody species of the existing wetland for treatment with rooting hormone (Hormodin, Indoleacetic acid, or Naphthalene -acetic acid) and direct placement in the soils of areas requiring supplemental plantings. A duplicate set of cuttings also could be planted in flats for propagation under controlled, greenhouse/ nursery conditions, as a backup for the fieId-planted cuttings. 9.3 Nuisance Vegetation Control Plan The presence of at least two, potentially invasive weedy grass species require the following for their surveillance and containment or eradication. Phragmites communis is an exotic (Australian) grass and is widely recognized as a noxious weed that rapidly displaces indigenous wetland vegetation, especially in disturbed or polluted areas, but provides little or no food and cover value for wildlife. Patches of this species occur in wet depressions scattered throughout the upland agricultural field and along the existing wetland habitat. Phalaris arundinacea, although an indigenous North American wetland grass, recently has been reported to proliferate and cause an aquatic weed problem in open water areas Ecological Solutions, LLC Adorns Faira.cre Fanns Town of Wayuinger, NY Page 21 following wetland creation projects. This commercially available grass is found scattered in the existing wetland, but is not being prescribed for seeding in the establishment areas. L thrum salicarla (Purple Loosestrife) is another exotic perennial species that rivals Phragmites in its ability to displace indigenous wetland vegetation, while similarly providing no food and cover resources for use by wildlife. 9.4 Map Existing Locations of Problem Species Any patches of these weeds within the establishment areas during construction will be eradicated using the procedures described below. Those sub -populations found outside of the establishment areas will not be dealt with until after all site preparation and planting efforts are finalized. Surveillance of these weed species will be performed during the monitoring phase of the establishment project, for all known locations nearby, as part of the biological monitoring plan for the entire establishment areas. Following completion of earthwork, site preparation and planting activities, a base map of the establishment areas on which the Iocations of the pond, stream, associated wetlands, and proposed vegetative cover types will be shown. At that time, the locations of nearby populations of these weedy species will be added to the base map, together with a grid -location system to monitor future expansions or contractions of each patch. This map then will be used during monitoring efforts of the wetland vegetative colonization/ establishment, to determine the relative success of the containment and eradication efforts. 9.5 Containment and Eradication Methods Limited options are available for eradication of nuisance species, especially Phragmites communities. Historically, most attempts to control this weed have failed, even when rhizome excavation and herbicide applications were used. The most realistic goal, therefore, may be to contain these pre-existing patches and prevent invasion and establishment of new patches. A combination of mechanical control and, as a last resort, herbicide applications will be used to eradicate or contain these populations. An idealized sequence of methods to achieve these goals would include: ■ Mechanical mowing in accessible upland areas, or manual cutting in wetland/ establishment areas, to preclude bolting/ flowering and seed set/ dispersal; ■ Excavation of any rootstocks that survive mowing, and; Ecological Solations, LLC Adams Fairacre Fanns Town of Wappinger, NY Page 22 ■ Spraying in upland areas and/or manual, wick -applications in wetland/ establishment areas, of any emerging shoots that survive mowing, and excavation, and; ■ Repetitions of these procedures to either eradicate or contain these plants. Ecological Solutions, LLC NPY Wetland Impact and Establishment Report Adams Fairacre Farm Route 9 Town of Wappinger Dutchess County, NY January 16, 2008 Prepared by: Michael Nowicki Ecological Solutions LLC 1248 southford Road Southbury, CT 06488 (203) 910-4716 Adams Fairacre Farm Mav 19, 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 4 Table 2.1-1 Post -Development Wetland Area ........................................ .............. ...... ........ .,4 2.0 ESTABLISHMENT JUSTIFICATION.............................................................................. 5 2.1 Site Design and Minimization of Impacts.................................................................... 5 2.2 Methodology....................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Seeding and Establishment Planting............................................................................ 6 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................... .................... 7 3.1 Prescription of Vegetative Cover Types........................................................................ 7 4.0 PREFORMANCE STANDARDS....................................................................................... 9 5.0 ESTABLISHMENT SITE SELECTION............................................................:.............18 6.0 BASELINE INFORMATION............................................................................................19 6.1 Hydrology of the Establishment Area.........................................................................19 6.2 Soil Preparations and Vegetative Establishment......................................................19 6.3 Diversity and Proposed Locations of Vegetative Cover Types .............................. 20 Table 6.3-1 Restorative Seeding Components...................................................:.....................................22 Ecological Solutions, LLC Adains Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 3 7.0 ESTABLISHMENT WORK PLAN .............................................................................. 23 7.1 Construction Schedule................................................................................ ............ 23 7.2 Transplanting Techniques............................................................................................. 25 8.0 SITE PROTECTION........................................................................................................... 26 9.0 MONITORING PLAN AND REPORT................:......................................................... 28 10.0 MAINTENANCE AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................ 29 10.1 Fall Supplemental Seeding ..................................................................................... 29 10.2 Cuttings for Supplemental Establishment............................................................... 29 10.3 Nuisance Vegetation Control Plan........................................................................ . 29 10.4 Map Existing Locations of Problem Species............................................................ 30 10'.5 Containment and Eradication Methods.................................................................... 30 Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Applicant, Adams Fairacre Farm, is seeking authorization for the discharge of fill material to a total 0.90 acres of Federal wetland from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and 33 CFR Part 330 under Nationwide Permit 39. The reauthorized Nationwide Permit program became effective on March 19, 2007. The Applicant is also seeking authorization from the Town of Wappinger for the placement of fill material into 0.62 acres of Town regulated wetland and 5.11 acres of regulated 100 foot buffer area. The Applicant, Adams Fairacre Farm, proposes the construction of a 72,000 square foot Grocery Store and Garden Center and approximately 45,000 square feet of outdoor Plant Display Area and associated features including 365 parking spaces, utilities, stormwater management basins, and grading on property located on NYS Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. The Applicant is proposing to impact 0.90 acres of federal wetland included in the 0.62 acres of Town regulated wetland impact. The impact to federal and Town wetland is attributed to the provision of parking spaces, and loading area behind the proposed Adams Fairacre Farm Market and associated grading. Table 2.1-1 Post -Development Wetland Area Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Fann May 19, 2007 Page 5 2.0 ESTABLISHMENT JUSTIFICATION 2.1 Site Design and Minimization of Impacts The proposed layout for the development and associated features sought to minimize encroachments into Federal and Town regulated wetlands however this was difficult due to the site plan requirements for an Adams Fairacre Farm Market and the position of the wetlands on the property. The proposed project is designed to provide a suitable layout for the development that meets the Town of Wappinger Building and Highway Code and meets the Phase II Stormwater Regulations for treating stormwater from impervious surfaces prior to discharge. The site design minimizes wetland disturbances to the maximum extent practicable. To compensate for the loss of wetland area and functional capacity, the Applicant is committed to the establishment of 090 acres of wetland in several areas on the parcel and wetland buffer mitigation in the form of a planted stormwater basin that will essentially function as a wetland and thereby further increase the size of the primary resource. The purpose of this report is to document the criteria upon which the total wetland establishment has been designed and provide guidance to the contractor during implementation of the plan. The ultimate goal is to produce a method to create a viable long-term (permanent) wetland community from an area that is lightly wooded and contains debris including car parts. The work described herein includes the compensatory establishment of approximately 0.67 acres of proposed shrub wetland . disturbance with approximately 0.90 acres of forested, shrub and wetland meadow. The submitted Wetland Disturbance and Establishment Plans describe the techniques and materials proposed to establish the water table in the establishment wetland, transplant substrate material, and establish wetland vegetation. 2.2 Methodology The compensatory wetland establishment plan is based on the proposed establishment area being similar in spatial relation and existing features, and the following principles: ■ The water table in the establishment wetland must be maintained near the finished grade; • The establishment area must not be flooded for prolonged periods of time as a result of significant rainstorms; Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairarm Farm May 19, 2007 Page 6 ■ The area must be planted with sufficient hydrophytic vegetation, seed, and, rootstock to allow wetland communities to emerge within a reasonable time period. 2.3 Seeding.and Establishment Planting The final design of the establishment area strives to create edge habitat around the existing wetland type and watercourse. Rootstock from the proposed disturbance areas will be placed at regular intervals throughout the establishment area without additional destruction of the existing wetland used for rootstock. The use of an excavator Will allow removal of select areas and preservation of other areas, such that the rootstock removal areas have vegetation remaining and that existing wetland alteration is minimized. In addition, erosion controls and orange snow fencing will surround those wetland areas, which will not be disturbed. The rootstock is to be transplanted using a large excavator that will remove blocks of rootstock after. the top growth has been cut and pruned back. The material will then be transported to the planting areas and put in place using pay -loaders. All slash from pruning of the rootstock areas is to be chipped and stockpiled. The areas of rootstock source are to be semi -circular in nature. This method is considered feasible due to the entry into the wetland with heavy equipment for the construction of the proposed roads. Such equipment, most likely, cannot traverse the wetland without damage to existing vegetation. The proposed method. would create semi -circles located over the proposed roads. Wetland plantings will be installed after the placement of the rootstock substrate material in the establishment area. This bedding material will keep soil moisture high during summer dry periods when establishment of vegetation is critical. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 7 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES - ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS The design of an interconnected system of existing wetland with forested, shrub and wet meadow wetlands is intended so that the existing wetlands serve as a "regeneration nucleus" around which a wide range of vegetative cover types could be established. This layout was selected to increase the amount of "edge habitat" adjacent to the undisturbed portions of the existing wetland, and to exploit the predicted hydrologic condition of the establishment area. Generally, wildlife populations thrive when edge habitat between cover and food types is increased. Increased edge equates to more resources being available to an animal in a smaller area. The placement of rootstock in the establishment area will provide an ecotonal microhabitat of value to certain wildlife species, while the wooded swamp interface with shrubs will provide two additional ecotones. or'.edge habitat". By maximizing the amounts and types of these ecotonal areas both the colonization of the area by local wildlife and the natural successional formation of shrub swamp and wooded swamp habitats will be considerably accelerated. A plan to irrigate the proposed establishment area from the existing watercourse will maximize the availability of surface water .resources to the establishment plantings, and other seeded areas of the establishment zone if it is required. 3.1 Prescription of Vegetative Cover Types The proposed establishment area is designed to maximize the community structural and floristic diversity of the compensatory establishment area when juxtaposed with the existing stream/vegetated wetland system. The proposed combination of shrub and wooded swamp is expected to enhance the bio -diversity and the wildlife habitat functions of the entire wetland ecosystem. Prescriptions for supplemental seeding of those areas not receiving establishment plantings, or rootstock transplants from the existing wetland disturbance area, is based on published data regarding the water depth tolerances of indigenous wetland species', as well as the commercial availability of seed of those species. Wherever possible, seed of indigenous wetland species and genera were prescribed, and potentially problematic, weedy species also were deliberately not prescribed for the establishment area. southern Tier Consulting, Inc - Wetland Plant Catalog 2007-2008. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 8 The establishment effort involves two major components: one to produce the required 1 hydrological regime, and the other to establish wetland terrain including placement of rootstock, seed, and wetland plantings throughout the establishment area. The establishment lines have been adjusted to take advantage of the natural contours and proximity to the existing wetlands. Successional wetland cover types other than the wooded swamp, such. as shrub plantings will provide stability, biological diversity, interspersion of cover types, increased wildlife habitat, and. provide the potential for increased structural/floristic complexity, and functional value of the establishment/ existing wetland ecosystem. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 9 4.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS The following section attempts to evaluate the various functions of the proposed wetland establishment. The following list of wetland functions includes: • Biological; Hydrologic Support; Groundwater; • Flood Water Storage; • Water Quality Maintenance; and, Aesthetic. Qualitative goals have been predicted for most functions listed above and are contrasted to the predicted characteristics of the wetland establishment that will contribute to these goals. Comparisons of the various functions of the proposed establishment area are made to the existing condition and to the adjacent wetlands. A functional analysis (of most functions) was completed for the proposed wetland establishment system via the functional evaluation model authored by Holland's and Magee.2 1.0 Biolog�cal From a wetland/ wildlife habitat perspective, the goals of the proposed establishment area include: ■ Provide for an increase in wetland/wildlife production and diversity over those of the existing conditions. 1.1„Review of Wildlife Habitat Value of Proposed Wetland Establishment Area This review of the wildlife habitat value of the proposed wetland establishment area and associated vegetative cover types is based upon an ecologically realistic prediction of what wetland classes and subclasses are likely to occur in the future. This prediction is based upon the proposed hydrology, soils, topography, seeding, mulching, and the 2 Holland's and Magee, 1985 ,- A Method for Evaluating the Functions of Wetlands. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm Page 10 May 19, 2007 colonization of the establishment area by indigenous plant and animal species from adjacent habitats. A diversity and abundance of bird and mammal species within the establishment area is anticipated because: ■ After planting, seeding and transplanting available rootstock, different habitat types (shrub and forested wetland) should develop on the site in the establishment area., which should provide diversity in wildlife species. ■ The interspersion among habitats should be good. ■ Data exists that indicate that wildlife numbers are closely related to total length . of edge, while wildlife diversity is a function of the number of kinds of edge. The .plan anticipates two "types" of edge. The additional edge will provide improved cover, shelter, forage and breeding areas for a greater diversity of wildlife species. • The hydrology of the establishment area is expected to remain relatively stable, albeit with some fluctuations in water levels. This is generally considered beneficial to wildlife populations especially' ground breeding reptiles and amphibians. ■ Most plant species selected for wetland planting and seeding have excellent forage value for wildlife. The proposed control of undesirable species (for example L t_ r}_hrum and Phr} should ensure the establishment of indigenous vegetative cover types beneficial to wildlife as food and shelter resources. Colonization of the area by wildlife is expected to be rapid. The establishment. area will be adjacent to a large existing and relatively undisturbed wetland that contains a watercourse. These should provide excellent colonization corridors for many species including amphibians and reptiles. ■ The size of the establishment area will be moderate (0.90 acres), and may be utilized by most species that occupy wetland areas. 1.1.1 Evaluation of Pro osed Wetland Establishment Area An evaluation of the proposed wetland establishment area and that of the existing condition of the proposed establishment area was performed. utilizing Holland's and Magee. The results clearly indicate that the proposed wetland establishment area will Ecological Solutions, L. Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 11 add superior wildlife value compared to the existing upland condition. There is a good probability that the wetland system will have a significant wildlife value. The value should be far superior to the existing pioneer forest and debris that now exists. 1.2 Summary and Conclusions Contingent upon the establishment of the proposed vegetative cover types, it is believed that the establishment project will meet the primary goal of providing a substantial increase in wildlife species diversity and abundance over that of the existing disturbed condition. In attaining this goal, we do not anticipate any negative impacts to ecological functions of on-site or downstream wetlands and water resources. Aquatic Diversity and Abundance In order to establish enhanced wildlife habitat on-site it is important that the goal of providing biological diversity and abundance in the created wetlands is realized. High aquatic diversity and abundance should establish the necessary food chain support, essential if the proposed wetlands are to provide valuable habitat for wildlife species. The proposed establishment area will increase biological diversity and abundance over the existing conditions. Review of Existing Conditions Currently conditions in the proposed establishment area appear to provide little biological, diversity or abundance nor suitable substrate for organism establishment. Review of Proposed Establishment Area The proposed establishment area will enhance bio -diversity and abundance, for the following reasons: ■ It is expected that the rootstock, broadcast seeding proposals and controlled hydrology will provide a great diversity of wetland and aquatic plant communities with a high primary productivity. Robust shrub communities and eventually mature swamp is predicted to dominate the site. All of these communities, especially the former, have extremely high values of net primary productivity.3 These high values should provide high levels of detritus (with its associated bacteria, fungi, diatoms and protozoans) that is believed to be the major food source of invertebrates (midge larvae and nematodes), crustaceans, mollusks and fish. Thus the predicted diversity of vegetative cover types 3 Mitsch W and J. Gosselink - Wetlands 1986. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacm Farm May 19, 2007 Page 12 should provide the base .for abundant and diverse wetland biological, communities. ■ The anticipated periodic influxes of nutrients through the intermittent watercourse on site from development. Such an influx of nutrients should maintain and promote primary productivity, and consequently the diversity and abundance of aquatic species such as detritus feeders, herbivores, zooplankton and consumer species at higher tropic levels. ■ The use of the existing rootstock in establishment area will provide an excellent, nutrient rich substrate for both the proposed vegetative communities, and for associated microorganisms and invertebrates. ■ The proximity of the proposed establishment area to the existing wetland/ watercourse should allow the rapid colonization of the establishment area with organisms from adjacent communities. The colonization of the establishment area from adjacent areas by wildlife species will do much to enhance species diversity and abundance. In conclusion, the bio -diversity and abundance in the establishment area will be significant, largely because the development of a complex food chain due to the anticipated high .diversity and primary productivity of the proposed cover types. As with most wetland systems the development of anaerobic conditions, the build-up of largely non -decomposed organic material, and the loss of some nutrients in this manner is anticipated. However, the periodic flushing ("stirring") of the system and some nutrient inflow, from upstream sources, should provide sufficient nutrients for vegetative wetland establishment, and the associated development of biological diversity and abundance. Evaluation of Aquatic Diversity and Abundance To date, no semi -quantitative evaluation procedure that appraises aquatic bio -diversity and abundance exists. Once again we will use a model developed by Holland's and Magee (1985) to compare the functional value of the upland condition with the proposed establishment area. Their biologic support model is the most appropriate to evaluate this function. In utilizing this model we have made the following assumptions: The assumptions for the proposed establishment area are very conservative, since we do expect high levels of vegetative community interspersion, and a number of wetland subclasses. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May _19, 2047 Page 13 The application of this model indicates that the proposed establishment wetland should provide a favorable biologic support function (assumed to be roughly equivalent to biodiversity and abundance) when compared to both other wetlands examined by Holland's and Magee. Summary and Conclusions The wetland establishment will eventually provide significantly greater biological diversity and abundance than the existing condition. 2.0 Groundwater Recharge/ Discharge One of the major goals of the proposed wetland establishment is to initiate a positive water. flow condition in the establishment area. The proposed establishment area should successfully complement the existing site hydrology and establish a recharge function to the watercourse in the delineated wetland. 2.1 Review of Existing and Proposed Conditions Once the hydrology has been established some discharge/ recharge functioning in the system can be expected. ■ Surface water discharge to the establishment area will provide an important function of periodically "flushing" out the establishment wetland. This ground water discharge is most likely to occur in spring and early summer. ■ Seasonal events that cause stream overflow will indirectly help to ensure the positive hydrology of wetland establishment area upon which the. initial establishment and long term survival of the proposed vegetative wetland communities are dependent. 2.2 Summary and Conclusions The proposed wetland establishment area will show natural seasonal fluctuations in recharge/ discharge characteristics. . 3.0 Flood Water Storage The flood storage and de -synchronization function of the establishment area will be high when compared with the existing wetland that will be disturbed as a result of the project. One goal of this establishment project is to establish a wetland system that will add functional value to the existing flood storage and de -synchronization capabilities of Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 14 the existing wetland area. The establishment area will increase the width of the wetland and create more functional capacity than the wetland areas that will be impacted by the proposed project. 3.1 Review of Existing Conditions Flood storage and de -synchronization in the existing establishment area is good due to the presence of silt and clay in the sub soil. Pore capacity for soil moisture retention is good due to the amount organic matter content of the existing soil. 3.2 Review of Proposed Conditions Wetland scientists and engineers agree that the flood storage and de -synchronization function of a wetland establishment area is the easiest to approximate since this function can be replicated by engineering structures alone. Essentially, this function will be replicated through the grading of the establishment area. The addition of soil modifiers (rootstock) in the establishment area will increase available organic matter thereby increasing the water storage capacity of the soil. Clearly there should be a substantial reduction in discharge rates from the wetland system and downstream flooding will not increase. This is important because development in the watershed will increase runoff rates into the existing wetland/ watercourse system. The wetland establishment area will provide extra detention capacity and will therefore, negate effects by storm water runoff. 3.3 Summary and Conclusions The wetland establishment will help control downstream flows for various storm events. The proposed wetland establishment area can be expected to enhance the flood storage and de -synchronization functional value on this portion of the site. 4.0 Water Quality Maintenance Function The water quality maintenance function (sediment toxicant retention; nutrient retention, transformation and export) of the establishment area has probably been reduced by its previous disturbance during mining activities. Therefore, one goal of the proposed wetland establishment is to restore this function of the disturbed area to its previous potential. Data regarding the capabilities of the establishment area to retain sediments, toxicants and nutrients, transform or export the latter is not available. Creating the establishment area will increase the surface water detention time on site. By increasing this surface water contact time with the vegetation and soils of the establishment wetland, the natural pollution attenuation functions will be enhanced. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 15 4.1 Summary of Existing Conditions The existing conditions maintain or improve water quality. 4.2 Review of Water Quality Maintenance Function of the Proposed Establishment Area The proposed establishment area cover types will greatly enhance nutrient/sediment/toxicant retention, improve nutrient transformation, and reduce nutrient export, at least during critical summer growth periods. The major surface water input to the establishment area will be from groundwater and surface water overflow from the stream. Water will flow through the establishment area that will function to further facilitate the removal of sediment and associated nutrient/ toxicant via soil adsorption and vegetative uptake. Topographic maps of the site indicate that there is less than a 3 -foot elevation change between the establishment area and the existing wetland. A nearly level gradient proposed for the establishment area will result in low water velocities with associated high sedimentation rates and related biogeochemical processes. ■ The proposed topographical features of the establishment area should also reduce water velocities and promote sedimentation. ■ The proposed establishment area that will be graded to maintain shallow vegetated areas. ■ The proposed diversity of cover types should provide a high biomass and great diversity in vegetative growth forms (shrubs etc.). The establishment area and associated vegetative cover types with stable hydrology should rapidly develop those abiotic and anoxic biotic processes (accumulation of nutrients within the organic matter due to slow decomposition rates, denitrification), characteristic of most wetland systems. ■ The proposed wetland system is moderate (0.90 acres in area) and therefore has good potential of trapping large quantities of sediment and associated nutrients/ toxicants. ■ Nutrient export from the proposed system should be significantly reduced, at least during the major summer growth period, because of uptake of the nutrients by the floristically diverse establishment system. The added floristic diversity should enhance the cumulative net primary productivity of the establishment area, as compared with the greater vegetative homogeneity of the orchard and mined area. Export may be significant in fall, with the decay Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Fa-rm May 19, 2007 Page 16 of vegetation and subsequent leaching. However, such export is not generally considered detrimental since the potential for algae blooms and associated oxygen deprivation at this time of year is minimal. ■ In conclusion, the proposed establishment area and associated cover types should improve the quality of run-off from the site. 4.3 Evaluation of Water Quality Maintenance Function Evaluation of. this function of the proposed wetland establishment area utilized the Holland's and Magee (1985) assessment method. The Holland's and Magee assessment method utilizes information that can be obtained from maps of the area and a brief site visit; no detailed measurements and monitoring are required. Furthermore, this method evaluates all aspects of water quality maintenance (sediment removal, nutrient removal, etc.) in one model and therefore is more appropriate for this assessment of the proposed wetlands. In utilizing the Holland's and Magee model to assess the relative value of the proposed establishment area the following assumptions were made: ■ The wetland establishment area are shrub dominated; ■ The vegetative density is moderate; and ■ Accumulated organic matter has low permeability. Results indicate the proposed system compares very favorably with other wetlands examined by Holland's and Magee, and favorably with the current state of the area. Certainly, it indicates that the proposed system will function adequately as far as water quality maintenance is concerned. 4.4 Summary and Conclusions The proposed establishment area will significantly improve the quality of water currently being discharged from the site. Most of the runoff that will pass through the proposed wetland establishment area will have already filtered through large areas of the existing undisturbed wetland, so that sediment loads and associated nutrients/toxicants would be expected to be low. 5.0 Aesthetic Certainly one of the goals of the proposed wetland establishment area is to create aesthetic value in an area that was used as a dump area and contains car parts and other debris. This, coupled with its wildlife value (deer, and small mammals), would suggest Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairam Farm May 19,2007 Page 17 that the establishment area would have considerable aesthetic appeal and value for non -consumptive recreation (birding, hiking). 5.1 Review of Existing and Proposed Conditions Large areas of standing debris has low � aesthetic appeal and its "uniqueness" and recreation value is limited. The proposed establishment area should restore the aesthetic appeal of the area. In addition, with its predicted wildlife value, the establishment area has the potential of providing non -consumptive (birding, nature study) recreational uses. It is anticipated that successional processes will eventually produce a mature red maple swamp in the establishment area. Typically, in this region, shrub wetlands are naturally displaced by hardwood species over successional time, due to the slower growth and reproductive rates of these species therefore natural recruitment/colonization by these species within the establishment area is expected. The historical "uniqueness" of the area will not be compromised by the proposal. 5.2 Evaluation of the Wetland Establishment Area The proposed wetland establishment area was compared with the corresponding upland area, using the model developed by Holland's and Magee (1985). In utilizing this model the following assumptions were made: 1. The establishment area is currently upland./debris area and will initially be shrub swamp dominated. The proposed establishment area appears to have greater aesthetic value from the current condition, mainly because of the increased diversity. 5.3 Summary and Conclusions The proposed establishment area will complement the aesthetic and recreational values of the existing wetland. The establishment area will potentially have greater recreational value than the existing condition since a greater diversity of vegetative cover types and therefore wildlife habitat should be provided. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 18 5.0 ESTABLISHMENT SITE SELECTION The proposed wetland establishment area was selected due to its current low quality of existing vegetation in this area and large amounts of debris currently stored there. Currently the establishment area is scrub growth and pioneer forest species. The establishment area will also take advantage of the existing red maple swamp and watercourse system to which it will be attached. Hydrology - a driving factor in establishment design - is evident in the inundated/ saturated condition of the surrounding soil and constant flow of the watercourse. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adains iFairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 19 6.0 BASELINE INFORMATION 6.1 Hydrology of the Establishment Area The field investigation revealed that organic matter approximately 4 inches deep exists within the establishment area. Beneath this layer exists a (2' - 4') layer of silty clay. Groundwater was observed in the test pit of the establishment in quantities that are considered sufficient to support hydrophytic vegetation and the establishment of hydric soils. The existing wetland and inter -connecting stream will serve as a "regeneration nucleus" from which vegetative cover can expand radially by vegetative reproduction into the proposed establishment area. Since different plant species within the same wetland may often exhibit a wide range of moisture requirements and flooding tolerances, the proposed elevation ranges will provide a micro -topographic moisture gradient conducive to high species diversity. The proposed layout of the establishment area is designed to facilitate construction and sedimentation control efforts by.ntinimizing excavation and grading requirements. 6.2 Soil Preparations and Vegetative Establishment The test pit confirmed the presence of mineral soil horizons at varying depths in the establishment area so. that the existing soil fertility is expected to be adequate for the establishment and growth of the transplanted rootstocks, wetland plantings, and seed. Organically rich transplanted rootstock will be incorporated into the surface of the establishment area and will provide increased fertility and water holding capacity essential for the establishment of wetland communities. Additional soil amendments are not expected to be required, since the .proposed vegetative cover types will thrive in a wide range of soil conditions, with pH values . from slightly acidic to neutral. Baseline soil analyses for the establishment area and adjacent .wetland, however, will be indispensable in the monitoring and assessment phase of the relative success or failure of the establishment effort. The combination of existing wetland with shrub swamp establishment area is expected to ensure vegetative establishment and long-term survival, even under summer conditions. The design of this system will maximize surface water availability to transplanted rootstock, wetland plantings, and area to be seeded with herbaceous wetland species. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams F'airacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 20 The finished grades of the establishment area .will create an increasing moisture �. gradient from the existing uplands through the establishment area that will improve chances for establishment of a diverse wetland community. These finished grades also will make use of seasonal fluctuations in water elevations, which are widely recognized as. crucial to seed germination and seedling establishment of both woody and herbaceous wetland plant species. The remainder of the terrain will be seeded with a mixture of herbaceous, wet meadow species in order to stabilize soils and establish a perennial wetland vegetative community. 6.3 Diversity and Proposed Locations of Vegetative Cover Types One major goal of the wetland establishment plan is to maximize the floristic diversity and availability of ecotonal, "edge habitat" for subsequent colonization by wildlife. The strategy to achieve this goal is to enhance the proposed wetland plant species and vegetative cover type diversity by utilizing the rootstock from impacted wetland area with seeding of commercially available wetland species at appropriate elevations and water depths within the establishment area. Another objective is to minimize the distances between the proposed vegetative cover types and open water to which access may be needed during periods of summer drought as part of the contingency irrigation plan. Shrub wetlands will be constructed to add "edge habitat" to the existing wetland vegetation. The existing wetland will remain in its current condition. It is expected that even with successful establishment of diverse cover types, their relative patterns and proportions will fluctuate over ecological time due to weather patterns and natural processes. The majority of the proposed wetland areas should develop, ultimately, into a mature forested wetland via an intermediate, shrub swamp successional stage. Supplemental seeding of the establishment area with wetland seed will stabilize and enhance the vegetative establishment of wetland communities in areas that will not be planted with wetland plants. The supplemental seeding prescriptions of the establishment area, presented below in Table 6.3-1, are based on the site-specific ecological suitability of commercially available seed of indigenous wetland plant species. As is discussed in detail in. the following sections, these plants provide excellent food and cover resources for waterfowl and other wildlife populations. In addition, wetland plantings available as whole plants, tubers or rhizomes are prescribed for all establishment area to initiate the colonization process. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairam Farm . May 19, 2007 Page 21 Emergent establishment area will be planted with Cyperus esculentus, Echinochloa crus- t' ag Ilii, Nasturtium o cinale and Peltandra virginica, at the seeding rates suggested by the supplier. These plants can survive seasonal periods of surface water drawdown and are thus expected to thrive even under a worst-case scenario of prolonged summer drought. Following seeding, used hay bales will be broken up and spread over these establishment area .to enhance micro faunal establishment and thus accelerate the establishment of a food chain. This technique and other aspects of the establishment system and associated wetland vegetation are expected to enhance the overall wildlife habitat value, soil microbial activity, and fertility of the establishment area. Phalaris arundinaa commercially available grass species commonly found in wet meadows was not prescribed due its having become a noxious weed in wetland landscaping projects. It is hoped that the herbaceous wet meadow flora will act as "living mulch" and thus enhance the potential for germination of dormant seeds in the transplanted rootstock soils. Also, seeds that may find their way into these areas from the undisturbed swamp will be provided with suitable conditions for germination. The selection of the proposed seed species, dicotyledons, will serve to minimize the formation of a dense thatch that could otherwise inhibit germination and establishment of all but the most vigorous woody plant seeds. Once established, seedlings of woody species will rapidly overtoptheir herbaceous counterparts and eventually displace those herbs with high light requirements. Little or no competition for water is expected between these woody and herbaceous components so that they can be expected to complement, rather than to compete, with one another during the early stages of successional formation of the establishment area. The gradual displacement of these wet meadow species, by shrubs, trees and more shade -tolerant herbs, however, is the natural successional process that is desired for the long-term establishment of a shrub -dominated swamp and, ultimately, a mature forested wetland community. Natural recruitment via seed dispersal into and germination within the establishment area, from the adjacent portions of the undisturbed wetland, the transplanted rootstock, and the wetland plantings are expected to contribute to the long term establishment of shrub wetland and wooded wetland segments over successional time. Baseline floristic data will be used to assess the relative success of the' entire establishment project during the five - year monitoring period. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairaar Farm May 19, 2007 Table 6.3-1 Restorative Seeding Components COVER TYPE & SPECIESCOMMON NAME Wet Meadow Area: Agrostis alba Echinochloa crus-gallii Fagopyrum tartaricum Glyc.eria sp. Lotus corniculatus Nasturtium officinale Polygonum pennsylvanicum Scirpus paludosus Redtop Bentgrass Duck Millet Goose Buckwheat Mannagrass Birdsfoot Trefoil True Water Cress Giant Smartweed Nutgrass DEPTH RANGE Wet mesic 0-1 foot Wet mesic Wet mesic Wet mesic 2.10 inches Wet mesic Wet mesic 22 RATE Not Given 2540 lbs./ ac. 35 lbs./ac Not. given 8 lbs./ac. Not given 20 lbs./ ac 25 lbs./ ac Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 23 7.0 ESTABLISHMENT WORK PLAN This section includes an outline of the construction schedule and descriptions of the planting techniques. The last portion describes the erosion control plan proposed to control erosion from the site during construction of the establishment area. 7.1 Construction Schedule This construction schedule is based on estimates to complete the major items of work and outlines the work necessary to complete the establishment work by the fall of 2007. Work includes: ■ Rough grading of establishment area; ■ Fine grading; ■ Transplanting of wooded rootstock; ■ Planting of all establishment area; ■ Seeding of all establishment area. Equipment that will be utilized for work at the establishment area includes: conventional earth moving equipment including bulldozers, pay loaders,, track mounted excavators and dump trucks. The soils being moved include clay. The following is a rough estimate of material to be moved: ■ Rough grade establishment area 0.90 acres; ■ Spread material (rootstock over bottom of establishment area approximately 500 cubic yards; ■ Fine grade establishment area approximately 200 cubic yards. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19 2007 Page 24 Grading of Establishment area Approximately 0.90 acres of wetland establishment area is proposed. Excavation of rough grades are expected to require approximately 500 cubic yards of earth movement at 400 cubic yards/ day/ dozer (D-8) = 2 dozer days required within the period of October 1 to November 15. Formulation of the establishment area after completion of rough grading will require an additional 200 cubic yards of earthwork. This operation should occur immediately behind the rough grading work and in conjunction with the transplanting of the rootstock. Rootstock Over Establishment area Spread rootstock over approximately 0.90 acres of establishment area. This will require placement of approximately 500 cubic yards .of transferred hydric soil and approximately 2 days of an excavator, a pay -loader, and one dump truck. Since transplanting of the rootstock must occur from October 1 to November 15 the establishment area must be created in this time period. Also, fine grading will require the use of dozers (D-8). Transplanting Rootstock Hauling is the limiting factor (vs. loading) in root stock movement. The preparation of the establishment area also controls, to some degree, the speed of this work, if the operation can move approximately 150 square feet per load, the relocation of 500 square feet will require approximately 3-4 trips. Planting Establishment area Actual planting of proposed wetland species shall be conducted in the fall of 2007. Delivery and installation of all plant material will require approximately 1-2 weeks depending on the availability of the proposed species and number of laborers used for the planting. Seedxn Seeding will occur via hydro -seed technique at approximately two acres/unit/day to cover the establishment area of 0.90 acres, approximately 1 unit day is required .to seed the area. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 25 7.2 Transplanting Techniques A track -mounted excavator that can reach into the existing wetland approximately 45 feet without leaving the proposed road will be utilized. It easily can remove 6 foot x 4 foot strips of rootstock. The rootstock will be cut into shape without major difficulty, although larger shrubs will be removed. The rootstock mass will be loaded immediately into trucks and transported to the establishment area for transplanting. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adorns Fairacre Farm May .19, 2007 Page 26 8.0 SITE PROTECTION Erosion control and earth works are proposed via conventional techniques. The flat condition of the establishment area will limit runoff velocities and only suspended clay particles are troublesome from an erosion standpoint. The overall plan is outlined as follows: Earthworks ■ Install erosion controls along establishment fronts and all waterways; ■ Along wetland use silt fences or hay bales; M. Along waterways use silt fences or hay bales; ■ Across waterways, for silt traps use hay bales down gradient from work/excavation areas and provide rapid installation of controls to minimize siltation. Over -seed establishment area with a mixture of wet meadow herbs and cover with straw mulch; Transplant Rootstock ■ Flag perimeter of donor vegetation, parallel to roads and avoiding mature trees, when possible. ■ Trim all woody vegetation to within 12 inches of ground surface. ■ Chip all slash and stockpile for re -spreading over exposed soils of donor areas; ■ Transplant, without delay, rootstock to receiving areas in establishment zone, as intact mats to form checkerboard pattern; Spread wood chips over exposed soils of donor wetland area; ■ Repeat above steps for each donor area; ■ Maintain erosion controls as needed, ■ Irrigate rootstock transplants, as needed, using water from stream; Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Fai7n May 19, 2007 Page 27 ■ Seed any exposed soils with.wet meadow species; Break-up and spread hay bales over terrestrial areas lacking rootstock transplants. Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 28 4. 9.0 MONITORING PLAN AND REPORT The establishment area will be monitored for a five-year period after installation of plantings, rootstock, and seed. Mortality rates will be calculated and dead or dying plant material will be replaced. Also, the reasons for the mortality will be examined, and the most likely cause for the loss will be corrected before any further establishment efforts are put forth. In the event that climatic conditions require irrigation of the plantings, rootstock transplants, and seed during the first summer month, the following plan is suggested. With the use of pumps and with the use of portable irrigation/ piping, the plants, rootstock, and seeded areas can be watered via the stream or water truck. Such watering should only . be necessary should rainfall deficit and heat index cause drought type conditions in the establishment area. It is noted that the water table should be only 1 foot below the planting bed surface. This condition in itself should cause the establishment area not to require irrigation. Minimum irrigation needs are to provide at least 1 inch of rainfall equivalent to the plants every 10 days. Such practice should begin if 1 inch of rain does not fall for 20 days, or if wilting is noticed in the transplants, and be continued for the required s period. Ecological solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 29 10.0 MAINTENANCE AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Several supplemental techniques to ensure the successful establishment of wetland vegetative cover are summarized briefly in the following discussion. If at the end of one complete growing season, the rootstock, planted, and seeded .areas fail to exhibit well- established plant communities, or exhibit patchiness in the patterns of vegetative cover, one or more of the following methods will be considered to supplement the initial vegetation effort. 10.1 Fall Supplemental Seeding If some of the originally planted material, from commercial suppliers has become established successfully in certain areas, a second attempt will be made using the same species in areas where establishment had failed. Soil analyses for the under vegetated. areas will be performed, and considerations of other ecological factors that may be responsible for the failure also will be performed before re -planting such areas. Any obvious zone patterns, such as failure to survive at certain elevations relative to water levels, may help to "fine tune" the locations and methods for the re -planting. 10.2 Cuttings for Supplemental Establishment A more costly last resort would be to gather stem cuttings early in the growing season from woody species of the existing wetland for treatment with rooting hormone (Hormodin, Indoleacetic acid, or Naphthalene -acetic .acid) and direct placement in the soils of areas requiring supplemental plantings. A duplicate set of cuttings also could be planted in flats for propagation under controlled, greenhouse/ nursery conditions, as a backup for the field -planted cuttings. 10.3 Nuisance Vegetation Control Plan The presence of at least two, potentially invasive weedy grass species require the following for their surveillance and containment or eradication. Phragmites communis is an exotic (Australian) grass and is widely recognized as a noxious weed that rapidly displaces indigenous wetland vegetation, especially in disturbed or polluted areas, but provides little or no food and cover value for wildlife. Patches of this species occur in wet depressions scattered throughout the upland agricultural field and along the existing wetland habitat. PhaIaris arundinacea, although an indigenous North American wetland grass, recently has been reported to proliferate and cause an aquatic weed problem in open water areas Ecological Solutions, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 30 following wetland creation projects. This commercially available grass is found scattered in the existing wetland, but is not being prescribed for seeding in the establishment area. L try Krum salicaria . (Purple Loosestrife) is another exotic perennial species that rivals Phragmites in its ability to displace indigenous wetland, vegetation, while similarly providing no food and cover resources for use by wildlife. 10.4 Map Existing Locations of Problem Species Any patches of these weeds within the establishment area during construction will be eradicated using the procedures described below. Those sub -populations found outside of the establishment area will not be dealt with until after all.site preparation and planting efforts are finalized. Surveillance of these weed species will be performed during the monitoring phase of the establishment project, for all known locations nearby, as part of the biological monitoring plan for the entire.establishment area. Following completion of earthwork, site preparation and planting activities, a base map of the establishment area on which the locations of the pond, stream, associated wetlands, and proposed vegetative cover types will be shown. At that time, the locations of nearby populations of these weedy species will be added to the base map, together with a grid -location system to monitor future expansions or contractions of each .patch. This map then will be used during monitoring efforts_ of the wetland vegetative colonization/ establishment, to determine the relative success of the containment and eradication efforts. 10.5 Containment and Eradication Methods Limited options are available for eradication of nuisance species, especially Phragmites communities. Historically, most attempts to control this weed have failed, even when rhizome excavation and herbicide applications were used. The most realistic goal, therefore, may be to contain these pre-existing patches and prevent invasion and establishment of new patches. A combination of mechanical control and, as a last resort, herbicide applications will be used to eradicate or contain these populations. An idealized sequence of methods to achieve these goals would include: ■ Mechanical mowing in accessible upland areas, or manual cutting in wetland/ establishment area, to preclude bolting/ flowering and seed set/ dispersal; ■ Excavation of any rootstocks that survive mowing, and; Ecological Solutions,, LLC Adams Fairacre Farm May 19, 2007 Page 31 Spraying in upland areas and/or manual, wick -applications in wetland/establishment area, of any emerging shoots that survive mowing, and excavation, and; Repetitions of these procedures to either eradicate or contain these plants. Ecological Solutions, LLC ENGINEER'S REPORT WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM FOR ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY, N.Y. SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 JOB No. 206111.0 Prepared By: MORRIS ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, PLLC 9 Elks Lane, Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Tei: (845) 454-3411 Fax: (845) 473-1962 187 Church Street, Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Tel: (845) 471-7900 Fax; (a45) 471-7901 389 Fairview Avenue, Hudson, New York 12534 Tel: (518) 828-2300 Fax: (518) 828-3963 E ENGINEER'S REPORT WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM FOR ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY, N.Y. SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 Prepared By: MORRIS ASSOCIATES 9 Elks Lane Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 JOB No. 206111.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1-2 PURPOSE 2-3 II. WATER MAIN & APPURTENANCES 4-21 III. SANITARY SEWERS & APPURTENANCES 22-37 IV. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES 38-41 V. GREASE TRAP 42-44 VI, DIRECTIONAL. BORINGS 45-56 VII, ROCK 57-60 Viii. TEST FORMS - SANITARY SEWER, MANHOLES & WATER MAIN 61-71 EXHIBITS "A" WAIVER - HORIZONAL & VERTICAL SEPARATION - US ROUTE 9 "B" HD-1, APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR A WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM -ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS "C" GEN -296, APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY - ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS "D" GREASE TRAP SIZING CALCULATIONS "E" DATA GATOR - SANITARY SEWER FLOW METER TC ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS I. INTRODUCTION: The project known as ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS, is a proposed seventy-four thousand seven hundred forty-two {74,742) square foot facility with a break down as follows; forty-four thousand three hundred twenty-three {44,323} square foot grocery store, offices and a food service facility {cafe} and with thirty thousand four hundred nineteen {30,419} square feet in a diversity of areas, ranging from tropical greenhouse, plant's & flower nursery's, garden center to seasonal areas situated on 12.82 acres of land. This proposed project is located on the east side of US Route 9 opposite Fowlerhouse Road in the Town of Wappinger. The proposed project is comprised of one (1) parcel with the Tax Grid No. of 135689-6157-04-649335 The applicant is: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS — Don Adams & Patrick Adams — Principals 765 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie, New York 12603. Adams Fairacre Farms will be served by a central water distribution system from the United Wappinger Water District. The existing 8" United Wappinger Water District water main will be extend from the westerly edge of US Route 9, located approximately twenty {20') feet south of the northerly entrance to the Heart Acura Car Dealership to the north edge of Fowlerhouse Road. Additional, at approximately one hundred fifty {150'} feet south of the southerly entrance to Heart Acura there will be an 8" directional bore under US Route 9 to serve the Adams Fairacre Farm project. Furthermore, Adams Fairacre Farms will be served by central sanitary sewer with connection to the Town of Wappinger & Tri -Municipal Sewer. Starting at an existing sanitary manhole in Heart Acura, the proposed 8" sanitary sewer will traverse easterly through Heart Acura to the westerly edge of US Route 9. At this point, the proposed 8" sanitary sewer will be installed to the north edge of Fowlerhouse Road and paralleling the 8" CLDIP Water Main. Also, at approximately one hundred forty {140'} feet south of Be ( the southerly entrance to Heart Acura there will be an 8" directional bore under US Route 9 to serve the Adams Fairacre Farm project. Utilizing NYSDEC "Design Standards For Wastewater Treatment Works 1988", the anticipated average daily hydraulic load rate will be 7,474 gallons per day -- {74,742 square feet x 0.1). Note: This 7,474 GPD does not reflect the proposed tropical greenhouse, plant & flower nursery's. The true daily water consumption will range from 20,000 GPD to 25,000 GPD. PURPOSE: The purpose of this engineer's report is outline the project known as Adams Fairacre Farms, this proposed site will be served by 8" cement lined ductile iron pipe, class 52 water main and 8" pvc/dr-18 connecting to the United Wappinger Water District. Hydrants will be spaced a maximum of six hundred {600'} feet, while valves will have a maximum spacing of eight hundred {800'} feet. The sanitary sewer system, connecting to the Town of Wappinger & Tri -Municipal sewer shall consist of 8" pvc/sdr-35 sanitary sewer mains and 8" pvc/dr-18 sanitary sewer mains. The sanitary sewer manholes shall be reinforced concrete, 48" I.D. with 5" walls and a maximum spacing of 400' between structures. -2- The following materials will be utilized for the project: MATERIAL ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS Sanitary Sewer Main 8" PVCISDR-3818" PVC DR -18 Sanitary Sewer Manhole 48" I.D. REINFORCED CONC. Sanitary Sewer Directional Boring 12" FUSIBLE PVC 1 DR -18 CASING PIPE 8" FUSIBLE PVC I DR -18 CARRIER PIPE Water Main 8" CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPE CLASS 82 12" FUSIBLE PVC I DR -18 Water Main CASING PIPE Directional Boring 8" FUSIBLE PVC 1 DR -18 CARRIER PIPE 52 SECTION 11 WATER MAINS & APPURTENANCES II -1 DESCRIPTION This work shall consist of the construction of water mains and appurtenances including the furnishing of all materials; all necessary excavation and backfilling; dewatering; sheeting, shoring and bracing of trenches and pits; bedding and jointing of pipe; installation of valves and hydrants; installation of service pipe; disinfection; testing the complete installation for leakage and contamination; restoration and maintenance of pavement, damaged surfaces and property; handling sewage, surface and storm flow; providing for the public safety; locating and protecting existing structures and facilities; removal of surplus excavated material and cleaning the site of the work, all in conformity with the requirements of this Specification and other Contract Documents. 11-2 MATERIALS The type, size and class of materials required for construction of the work specified herein shall be as called for in the Specification or on the Contract Drawings. All materials shall be tested at the place of manufacturing as required by the standard specifications to which the material is manufactured or as required herein. The contractor shall at his own expense furnish in duplicate to the engineer sworn certificates of such tests. In addition, the owner reserves the right to have any or all materials inspected or tested, or both, by an independent inspection service at either the manufacturer's plant or elsewhere. Such inspection and/or tests shall be at the owner's expense. All materials shall be subject to a careful inspection in the presence of the engineer or his authorized inspector just before being laid or installed and shall be subject to his approval before acceptance. All material found during the progress of the work to have cracks, flaws, or other defects shall be rejected by the engineer or his authorized inspector and the contractor shall promptly remove such defective material from the site of the work. All materials shall conform to the following requirements: II -2.1 Selected Material for Trench Bottom Selected material for the trench bottom shall consist of sand, or sand and gravel, well graded from coarse to fine, not lumpy or frozen and free from slag, cinders, ashes, rubbish or other material which, in the opinion of the engineer, is objectionable or deleterious. The gradation of the material shall be as follows: 4 Square Mesh Sieves 3/4 inch %4 inch No. 40 No. 100 II -2.2 Gravel Fill Percent Passing by Weight 100 30-65 5-30 0-10 Gravel fill shall consist of sound, tough, durable particles of crushed or uncrushed gravel, free from soft, thin elongated or laminated pieces and organic or other deleterious substances. It shall conform to the following gradations: Square Percent Passing Mesh Sieves by Weight 3-112" 100 %4" 30-65 No. 40 5-30 No. 100 0-10 11-2.3 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing Lumber used for sheeting, shoring and bracing shall be sound straight -grained, free from shakes, loose knots and other defects liable to impair its strength or durability. Lumber and sheeting may be reused if not ordered left in place and if in good condition. Lumber shall be spruce, fir or reasonably equal thereto. Steel used for sheeting, shoring and bracing shall conform to the following requirements: The steel shall be made by the open hearth process and shall conform to the following requirements as to chemical composition: Phosphorus not over 0.06 percent. Sulfur not over 0.06 percent. The steel shall conform to the following requirements as to physical properties: Tensile strength, minimum pounds per square inch 70,000 5 q A minimum tensile strength of 60,000 pounds per square inch shall be permitted for piling used in the fabrication of corners, tees, etc. Bent test specimens shall stand being bent cold through 180 degrees around a pin, the diameter of which is equal to twice the thickness of the specimen, without cracking on the outside of the bent portion. All steel shall conform in other respects -test specimens, number of tests, finish, marking and inspection to the requirements of A. S.T.M. A-7, II -2.4 Concrete Concrete for cradles, pipe encasement, cast -in-place manhole bases and special structures shall conform to the requirements for concrete specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents. II -2.5 Steel Reinforcement Steel reinforcement embedded in concrete shall conform to the requirements for steel reinforcement specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents. 11-2.6 Cement Mortar The cement mortar shall be composed of Portland Cement mixed in the proportion of one part by measure of cement to two parts by measure of clean, sharp sand, free from all foreign materials and organic matter. The cement and sand shall be carefully mixed dry, the water afterwards added and the mortar made fresh for the work at hand. No mortar shall be used which is found to be weak or imperfect, either from standing too long after being mixed or from other cause. The cement to be used shall be of the best American Portland or a brand approved by the Engineer, and shall meet all the requirements and test of the A.S.T.M. Specification Designation C-150, Type 11. Where required, the mortar shall be of a non - shrink type, containing "Embeco" or an approved equal and shall be mixed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Sand shall conform to the requirements of A.S.T.M. Specification Designation C-144. II -2.7 Brick Brick must be of the best quality, whole, sound hard -burned, perfect shape, presenting a regular, smooth surface, and shall have a crushing strength of at least 5,000 pounds per square inch, and after being thoroughly dried and then immersed in water for twenty-four (24) hours, they shall not absorb more than sixteen (16) per cent, in weight of water. The brick shall be culled when delivered on the job and all imperfect bricks shall be immediately removed from the job. R 11-2.8 Cement Lined Ductile Iron Pie CLDIP and Fittin s All water mains shall be Ductile Iron, centrifugally cast in accordance with AWWA C151-02. The pipe shall be class thickness 52 and shall have a working pressure as designated by the size of the pipe and the amount of cover. The ductile iron pipe and fittings shall be either the mechanical, flanged, or the push -.on type which employs a single elongated grooved rubber gasket, to produce a watertight joint seal. Pipes and joints shall conform to the following specifications or their latest revisions: Rubber Gasket Joints: AWWA C 111-00 Pipe: AWWA C 151-02 Fittings: AWWA C 153-00 Lining: AWWA C104-03 11-2.9 Valves A. Gate Valves: Shall be mechanical joint, iron body, bronze mounted, inside screw, resilient wedge and shall conform to AWWA Specifications C-509-01, working pressure of 150 psi minimum. All valves shall open counter clockwise and be provided with standard wrench nut. Each valve shall be provided with a two piece slide type valve box. II -2.10 _Hydrants Hydrants shall conform the AWWA Specification C-502-05 or the latest revisions thereof, compression type. The flange at the ground line shall have breakable couplings, (traffic type). Hydrants shall have a minimum seat ring opening of five (5) inches. Hydrants shall have six (6) inch side inlet foot piece with a six (6) inch gate valve conforming to Section 11-2.9. Each hydrant shall have two (2) 2 %Z inch hose nozzles and one (1) 4-112 inch pumper nozzle with national standard hose threads. The hydrant shall open counter -clockwise. All hydrants shall be of the same manufacturer. Hydrants shall be the "Super Centurion 250" model A-423 as manufactured by Mueller or an approved equivalent. II -3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS 11-3.1 Handlinq of Material All furnished materials shall be delivered and distributed at the site by the Contractor, and shall be properly protected from the weather, and where required, stored under cover. Pipe and other materials shall be loaded and unloaded by lifting with hoists or skidding so as to avoid shock or damage. Under no circumstances shall such materials be dropped. Pipe handled on skidways shall not be skidded or rolled against pipe already on the ground. II -3.2 Sewage, Surface and Flood Flows The contractor shall furnish all the necessary equipment, take all necessary precautions, and assume the entire cost of handling any water from leakage or breaks of existing mains, sewage, seepage, storm, surface and flood flows which may be encountered at any time during the construction of the work. The manner of providing for these flows shall meet with the approval of the Engineer and the entire cost of said work shall be included by the contractor in the item or items in handling of prices in the Proposal covering the particular parts of the work. II -3.3 Provision for Public Safe To protect persons from injury and to avoid property damage, adequate barricades, construction signs, torches, warning lights, and guards as required shall be placed and maintained during the progress of the construction work until the site is safe for public use. Whenever necessary, watchmen shall be provided to prevent accidents. Rules and regulations of the local authorities regarding safety provisions shall be observed. Excavations shall be conducted to cause the least interruption to traffic. If so directed by the Engineer, the contractor shall provide suitable bridges at street and driveway crossing where traffic must cross open trenches, Hydrants under pressure, valve pit covers, valve boxes, curb stop boxes, fire or police call boxes, or other utility controls shall be unobstructed and accessible during the construction period. II -3.4 Existin Structures and Facilities The location of existing underground utilities and structures as shown on the Contract Drawings is approximate only and is shown only for the convenience of the contractor, who must verify the information to his own satisfaction. The Owner disclaims any responsibility for the accuracy of completeness of the information shown on the drawings with regard to existing underground utilities or structures. The contractor shall not be entitled to any additional compensation or additional time for completion because of inaccuracy or incompleteness of such information. The contractor shall be held responsible for the cost of repairing all utilities, structures and subsurface drains, whether shown on the plans or not, when such become damaged due to the construction operations of the contractor. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to notify all utility companies before the start of the work. No valve, switch or other control on existing utility systems shall be operated for any purpose by the contractor without approval of the utility. Location of all underground structures which may be encountered during the course of construction is the responsibility of the contractor. It is his duty to locate existing utilities such as water, gas, sanitary and storm sewers, subsurface drains, telephone and electrical conduits, poles and the like. He shall locate underground structures or arrange with the Owners of them to assign a representative to indicate their location. All costs, including the costs of the services of the above mentioned representatives, incurred in such location operations shall be borne by the Contractor. Should it become necessary to change the position, or temporarily remove any electric conduits, water pipes, gas pipes, or other pipes or structures, in order to permit the contractor to use a particular method of construction or in order to clear the main or structure being built, the contractor shall notify the engineer of the location and circumstances, and shall cease work if necessary, until satisfactory arrangements have been made with the owners of the said pipes, wires, or structures to the properly care for the same. No claims for damages will be allowed on account of any delay occasioned thereby. The contractor shall, at his own expense, shore up and protect any buildings, poles, p bridges or other public or private structures which may be encountered or endangered in the prosecution of the work and that may not be otherwise provided for, and he shall repair and make good any damages caused to any such property by reason of his operations. No extra payments will be made for said work or material. No extra payment will be made for the cost of locating, removing, relocating, shoring, protecting or repairing and existing structures and facilities as required herein, but the cost thereof shall be included by the contractor in the item or items in the Schedule of Prices in the proposal covering the particular parts of the work, except as noted on other sections of these specifications. 11-3.5 Alignment and Grade All construction shall conform to the required lines and grades. No deviation shall be made from the required line or grade except with the written consent of the engineer. Wherever obstructions not shown on the Contract Drawings are encountered during the progress of the work and interfere to such an extent that an alteration of the fine and/or grade is required, the engineer shall have the authority to order a deviation from the line and grade. If the change in line and/or grade results in work beyond that required by the Contract Documents, compensation for such additional work will be made as specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents. Deviation form the line and grades shown on the Contract Drawings or established by the engineer shall be corrected at the expense of the contractor. II -3.6 Trenches and Other Excavations The trenched and other excavations shall be sufficient width and depth at all points to allow all pipes to be laid, joints to be formed, and structures and appurtenant construction to be built in the most thorough and workmanlike manner, and to allow for sheeting and shoring, pumping and draining, and for removing and replacing any materials unsuitable for foundations. The trenches and excavations shall be at least 18 inches wider than the outside dimensions of the structures they are to contain; the maximum clear width of the trench shall be the diameter of the pipe plus two feet, unless otherwise shown on the Contract Drawings. Greater width of trench shall be permitted only upon approval of the engineer. The depth of trench shall be such that the pipe when laid on the prepared bed shall have at least five (5) feet cover from top of pipe to finished surface grade unless shown otherwise on the he drawings and typical sections. The excavation for trenches shall be a minimum of 6 inches and not more than 8 inches below the specified bottom of the pipe. Before the pipe is laid, the trench shall be backfilled to subgrade by backfilling with an approved material, meeting the requirements for "Selected Material for Trench Bottom", in 6 inch compacted layers. The layers shall be thoroughly tamped as directed by the engineer so as to provide a uniform and continuous bearing and support for the pipe. If the bottom of any 10 excavation had been removed below the 8 inch limit without authorization by the engineer, it shall be filled with an approved material and thoroughly compacted as directed by the engineer, at the contractor's expense. The subgrade elevation for pipe shall be 15% of the outside diameter of the pipe above the pipe invert elevation, unless otherwise shown on the Contract Drawings, to ensure that the bottom quadrant of the pipe barrel is embedded the backfilled material, II -3.7 Excavation in Poor Soil and Refilling to Sub rade Where the bottom of the excavation is found to be unstable, or to include ashes, cinders, all types of refuse, vegetable or other organic material, or large pieces of fragments of inorganic material which in the judgement of the engineer should be removed, the contractor shall excavate and remove such unsuitable material to the width and depth ordered in writing by the engineer. The subgrade shall then be made by backfilling with an approved material, meeting the requirements of "Selected Material for Trench Bottom" in six (6) inches compacted layers. The layers shall be thoroughly tamped as directed by the engineer so as to provide a uniform and continuous bearing the support for the pipe and/or structure. The finished subgrade shall be prepared accurately by means of hand tools. Such excavation in poor soil and refilling to subgrade will be paid for as specified elsewhere herein. II -3.8 Special Foundation in Poor Soil Where the bottom of the excavation at subgrade is found to consist of material which is unstable to such a degree that, in the opinion of the engineer, it cannot be removed and replaced with an approved material thoroughly compacted in place to support the pipe or structure properly. The contractor shall construct a foundation for the pipe or structure consisting of piling, timbers or other materials, in accordance with the plans prepared by the engineer. Extra compensation will be allowed for the additional work, as provided for elsewhere in the Contract Documents. 11-3.9 Rock Excavation The word "rock" wherever used as the name of an excavated material, shall mean solid ledge rock and masonry and boulders which, in the opinion of the engineer, requires for its removal drilling and blasting, wedging, sledging or barring, or breaking up with a power operated hand tool. No soft or disintegrated rock or boulders which can be removed with a hand pick or power -operated excavator or shovel, no loose, shaken or previously blasted rock or broken stone in rock fillings or elsewhere; and no rock exterior to the minimum limits of measurement allowed, which may fall into the excavation will be measured for payment. Large rock and boulders shall be removed to provide a clearance of at least six (6) inches below and nine (9) inches on each side of all pipe, fittings, manholes and special structures. The specified minimum clearances are the minimum clear distances which will be permitted between any part of the pipe and appurtenances being laid or structures being built and any part, projection or point of such rock, boulder or stone. Where excavation is made in rock or boulders and the clearance specified above is provided, the subgrade shall be made by backfilling with an approved material meeting the requirements of "Selected Material for Trench Bottom", in six (6) inch compacted layers at the contractor's expense. The layers shall be thoroughly tamped as directed by the Engineer so as to provide a uniform and continuous bearing and support for the pipe and/or structures. The finished subgrade shall be prepared accurately by means of hand tools. The hours of blasting shall be fixed by the Engineer and in accordance with local regulations. Any damage caused by blasting shall be repaired by the Contractor at his expense. The contractor's procedures and methods of blasting shall conform to State and local laws and to municipal ordinances. The code of the Association of General Contractors of American Manual of Accident Prevention in Construction must be followed. The contractor, in addition to observing all laws and ordinances relating to the storage and handling of explosives, shall also conform to any further regulations which the Engineer may deem necessary in this respect. Then rock is removed by blasting, it shall be removed at least thirty (30) feet in advance of the laying of pipe or construction of structures. When an existing pipe, conduit or structure intersects or comes within five (5) feet of the line of the trench, any rock necessary to be excavated for a distance of five (5) feet in the clean, on each side of the existing pipe, conduit, or structure shall, in all cases, be removed without blasting. The contractor shall be held responsible for and shall make good any damage caused by blasting or accidental explosions. Rock shall be measured for payment by the engineer. If the engineer deems it necessary, the trench shall be stripped of earth in sections of not less than fifty (50) feet prior to blasting or removal so the profiles or sections may be measured. Any rock removed and/or trench with rock excavation backfilled before measurement will not be paid for. Material from rock excavation may be used as backfill only in conformance with the following requirements: The backfill shall not contain stones or rock more than nine 12 (9) inches in their largest dimension and backfill shall not contain more than 50 percent rock. All rock shall be uniformly distributed throughout the backfill; nesting of rocks will not be permitted. Material from rock excavation which is not suitable for backfill, as determined by the engineer, shall be removed from the site. Suitable backfill material acceptable to the engineer shall be substituted for the unsuitable rock material. Removal of unsuitable rock excavation material and furnishing and placing of suitable backfill shall be accomplished by the contractor at his expense. Ledge rock or solid masonry, requiring blasting, wedging, sledging, or barring, or breaking up with a power operated hand tool for its removal shall be estimated as rock excavation and paid for as provided elsewhere herein. Boulders over one (1) cubic yard in size will be classified as rock excavation, 11-3.10 Excavation Methods The use of trench -digging machinery will be permitted except where its operations will cause damage to trees, buildings or existing structures above or below the ground. At such locations hand methods shall be employed to avoid such damage. Trenches shall be opened at such times and to such extent only as may be permitted by the engineer. The contractor shall furnish, put in place and maintain such sheeting, shoring and bracing as may be required by all governing state laws and municipal ordinances, and as may be necessary to protect life, property or the work. The engineer may order additional, longer or stronger sheeting, shoring and bracing, or different methods where in his opinion the sheeting, shoring and bracing is not satisfactory and it shall be furnished without additional cost to the owner. Any Omission on the part of the engineer to so order shall not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to provide adequate sheeting, shoring and bracing. When close sheeting is required, it shall be so driven as to prevent adjacent soil from entering the trench either below or through such sheeting. Bracing, shoring and sheeting shall be securely fastened in place so they cannot loosen up and fall or move from position. Where sheeting and bracing are used, the trench width shall not be less than 18 inches, or 1 foot greater than the outside diameter of the pipe, whichever is greater. The sheeting, shoring, bracing, etc., or parts thereof, shall be left in place after the completion of the work in location where ordered in writing by the engineer. The engineer may require that at intervals the sheeting shall be left in place and that other sheeting be removed. All sheeting which is left in place, whether ordered by the engineer or left for the convenience of or to subserve the interests of the contractor, shall be cut off at least three (3) feet below the established finished grade or the existing surface of the ground, whichever is lower. Failure to order sheeting left in place by the engineer shall not relieve the contractor from any responsibility for any loss or danger whatsoever from his lack of leaving sheeting in place on his own initiative. 13 Sheeting, shoring and bracing, except that which has been permitted or ordered to be left in place, may be removed after backfilling has been brought up to such an elevation as to permit its safe removal. As backfill is placed and if sheeting is to be withdrawn, the voids left by the withdrawn sheeting, shoring and bracing shall be filled and compacted. The cost of furnishing, placing and removing all required sheeting, shoring and bracing and leaving in place of sheeting, shoring and bracing indicated in the Contact Drawings shall be included by the contractor in the item or items in the Schedule of Prices in the proposal covering the particular parts of the work. Any sheeting, shoring and bracing ordered left in place by the engineer will be measured for payment and paid for as specified elsewhere herein. The contractor shall at all time provide ample means and equipment with which to promptly remove and dispose of all water and drainage entering the excavations or other parts of the work, and to keep such excavations dry until the pipe line and/or structures to be built therein is completed. In no case will the laying of pipe or building of structures be permitted with water in the excavation. Dewatering methods and equipment shall be adequate to properly dewater the work and shall be subject to the approval of the engineer, and all water removed form the work shall be disposed of in an approved manner without damage to adjacent property or other work. No tunneling will be permitted in place of 'open trench excavation unless specifically authorized by the engineer. All surface materials which, in the opinion of the engineer, are suitable for reuse in restoring the surface shall be kept separate from the general excavation material, directed by the engineer. All excavated material shall be piled in a manner that will not endanger the work or limit free access to all parts of the work. Gutters shall be kept clean or other satisfactory provisions made for street and other drainage. Precautions shall be taken to maintain access to all valve boxes, manholes, and fire hydrants. Excess material shall be disposed of by the contractor at his expense. II -3.11 Pipe Laying Proper implements, tools, and facilities satisfactory to the engineer shall be provided and used by the contractor for the safe and convenient prosecution of the work. All pipe shall be carefully lowered into the trench piece by piece by means of a derrick, ropes or other suitable tools or equipment, in such a manner as to prevent damage to the materials and protective coatings or linings. Under no circumstances shall materials be dropped or dumped into the trench. Pipe and fittings shall be carefully cleaned with a dry cloth to remove all sand, mud, clay, oil or ice so as to be left 14 i. clean and dry, Every precaution shall be taken to prevent material from entering the pipe while it is being placed in the line. During the laying operations, no debris, tools, clothing or other materials shall be placed in the pipe, At times the pipe shall be closed by a water tight plug or other means approved by the Engineer. This provision shall apply during the noon hour as well as overnight. If water is in the trench, the seal shall remain in place until the trench is pumped completely dry. No pipe shall be laid in water or when in the opinion of the Engineer, trench conditions are unsuitable. All pipe shall be laid up hill with the bell, socket or coupling ends facing the direction of laying. Preparation of the trench bottom and placement of the pipe shall be carefully made so that when in final position, the pipe is true to line and grade, carefully centered, with a uniform invert. Mechanically restrained joints shall be utilized at all fittings, dead ends, tees, crosses etc. in accordance with the approved plans, 11-3.12 Bedding of Pipe The pipe shall be bedded as shown on the Contact Drawings, or as directed by the Engineer, in accordance with the following requirements: A. Bedding on Selected Material: Unless otherwise shown on the Contract Drawings, or permitted by the Engineer, the bottom of the trench, after the selected material for the trench bottom has been placed and compacted, shall be shaped to receive the bottom quadrant of the pipe barrel. In addition, bell holes shall be excavated so that after placement only the barrel of the pipe received uniform bearing pressure form the trench bottom. B. Concrete Encasement and Concrete Cradles - Pipes encased in concrete or supported by a concrete cradle shall be temporarily supported, by means of precast or poured in place concrete blocks or bricks, on the prepared bottom of the trench or excavation, Temporarily support shall have minimum dimensions and shall support the pipe at not more than two locations, one adjacent to each end of each length of pipe. After jointing of the pipe had been completed, concrete shall be placed to provide support for at least the bottom quadrant of the pipe; for pipe encasement, sufficient concrete shall be used so that the encasement is at least four (4) inches thick at all points. The concrete shall be of such consistency so as to permit its flow, without excessive rodding, to all required points around the pipe surface. Unless otherwise shown on the Contract Drawings or required or permitted by the engineer, the width of cradle shall be such as to fill the trench width completely. In no case shall the width of cradle be less than twelve (12) inches greater than the diameter of the pipe at the outside of the bell or socket. The placing of the concrete shall be done in such a manner that the grade and alignment of the pipe will not be 15 disturbed. Special provisions shall be taken to prevent flotation of the pipe during placement of the concrete. II -3.13 Jointing In general the method and materials to be used in jointing the pipe shall follow the recommendations of the pipe manufacturer, Prior to the start of the work, pipe layers shall be instructed by a representative of the pipe manufacturer in the proper method to be used, and the contractor will see that these methods are followed. Preparatory to making pipe joints all surfaces of the portions of the pipe to be jointed or of the factory made jointing material shall be clean and dry. No jointing of the pipes will be permitted in a wet trench or other excavation. Gaskets, lubricants, primers, adhesives, etc., shall be installed and used as recommended by the pipe or joint manufacturer's specifications. Gaskets and other jointing materials shall be inspected before installation of the pipe and any loose or improperly affixed gaskets and jointing materials shall be removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the engineer. The pipe shall be aligned with the previously installed pipe, and the joint put together. Immediately after the pipes are put together, the position of each gasket and joint shall be inspected to be sure that the joint has been properly made and is tight. If, while making the joint, the gasket or jointing material becomes loose or misplaced, the pipe shall be removed and the joint remade to the satisfaction of the engineer. The joints shall be made in a workmanlike manner so as to obtain the degree of water tightness required. If a pipe joint is made by pushing against the opposite end of the entering pipe, using a metal bar or other means, the end of the pipe shall be protected with a block of wood to distribute the stresses and prevent damage to the pipe. II -3.14 Settina Valves Valves shall be located and set where shown on the plans. Valve clusters at intersections shall be set symmetrically and as close together as is practical. Valves and boxes shall each be set and maintained in a vertical position. The position of the nut inside the box shall be such that free and complete access to the nut can be achieved with the wrench. i The finished elevation of the top of the valve box shall be such that the top is level with the surrounding pavement. In the case of incompleted streets or roads the upper box section shall be as close as possible to the theoretical grade of the finished 16 t street surface and the valve or valve cluster protected by barricade, barrels or other markers satisfactory to the engineer. 11-3.15 Hydrants Hydrants shall be located and set approximately where shown on the plans as ordered and directed by the engineer. Hydrants shall be connected to the main by necessary length, of six (6) inch ductile iron pipe. All joints shall be M.J. with restrained joint. Hydrant valves shall be located as shown on the typical section on the plans. The hydrant shall be so placed that the distance from the nut of the pumper connection to the finish ground elevation shall be 15" to 18". Extension sections shall be used where necessary. Hydrants which are located in the street rights of way shall be set so that the ground line at the hydrant if marked or the ground lines as established above shall be 6" to 8" above the edge of the street at the hydrant. II -3,16 Service Pipe Services shall be located and installed where directed by the Engineer in conformance with the requirements heretofore specified for "Excavation", "Pipe Laying", "Bedding of Pipe", "Jointing", "Backfilling", and "Testing" and/or in conformance with local municipal plumbing codes. Minimum cover for service pipe shall be 4'-6" unless shown otherwise on the plan. The service pipe shall terminate with a curb stop and box which shall be set so that the top will be at finished grade, Before backfilling the corporation stop shall be turned to the "on" position. Service pipe and appurtenances shall be included in and subject to the hereinafter specified tests for pressure, leakage and contamination. II -3.17 Backfillinci Upon completion of the laying of pipe, backfilling will be started immediately and shall be continued so that at the end of the working day all pipe is completely backfilled. Selected material for trench bottom shall be placed continuously by hand in layers not exceeding six (6) inches in thickness after compaction and thoroughly consolidated by tamping simultaneously on both sides of the pipe to a minimum height if twelve (12) inched above the top of the pipe and to such additional height as may be shown on the contract drawings. 17 The remainder of the trench shall be backfilled to the full height of the trench or to the elevations shown on the Contract Drawings as follows: A. Where trenches and other excavations are located in roadways, sidewalks, driveways, under curbing or other utilities the backfill shall consist of run of trench material placed in layers not to exceed eight (8) inches and compacted by mechanical tampers. The top ten (10) inches of the backfill shall be gravel fill meeting the requirements herein before specified. If, in the opinion of the engineer, the trench material is not usable as compacted backfill on his written order it shall be disposed of and the backfill made in part or entirely with gravel fill compacted as described above. In this case this gravel fill will be paid for as specified elsewhere in these specifications. B. At all other locations, unless specifically shown or required otherwise by the Contract Documents, the backfill may be made with suitable excavated material placed and compacted in layers not to exceed eight (8) inches in thickness prior to compaction. If, in the opinion of the engineer, the trench material is not usable as compactable backfill, on his written order, it shall be disposed of and the backfill made in part or entirely with gravel fill compacted as described above. In this case this gravel fill will be paid for as specified elsewhere in these specifications. The surface of the backfill shall be neatly graded and left in such a condition that, after final consolidation of the backfilt had taken place, the top of the backfill shall not show any depressions. Where shown on the Contract Drawings, the contractor shall place fill to form a protective embankment over the pipe. This fill shall conform to the dimensions and elevations shown on the Contract Drawings, and shall be placed and compacted as specified under B above. Any deficiency in the quantity of material for backfilling the trenches or construction embankments over the pipe, or fillings any depressions caused by settlements shall be supplied by the contractor at his own expense. In any case, the backfill shall not contain stones or rock more than six (6) inches in their largest dimension and backfill shall not contain more than 50 percent rock. All rocks shall be uniformly distributed throughout the backfill; nesting of rocks will not be permitted. The contractor shall not permit the excavated trench or any portion thereof to be used for disposal of rubbish and all backfill shall be free from cinders, ashes, organic material or other material which in the opinion of the engineer is unsuitable. Backfilling around appurtenances and special structures shall be made as specified above the pipe. No backfill shall be placed against masonry structures until, in the opinion of the engineer, the concrete or mortar has had sufficient time to harden and cure. Backfill shall be placed evenly to the same height on all sides of the structure in order to avoid unbalanced loading on the structure. 18 Backfilling shall not be done in freezing weather except by permission of the engineer, and it shall not be made with frozen material. No backfill shall be made where the material already in the trench is frozen, Compaction of all backfill and fills shall be completed to the full satisfaction of the engineer. The specifications for backfill as detailed above are considered to be minimum. The contractor shall assume full responsibility for the preservation of the work and the structural integrity of the pipe and appurtenances. He shall also assume full responsibility for trench settlement during the construction period and the guarantee period, In the event of trench settlement he shall do the required backfill, grading, and/or replacement of paving to restore the prescribed surface elevations. II -3.18 Testing During the progress of construction and / or upon completion of the same, pressure leakage and disinfection tests shall be made on the pipe and appurtenances. Pressure tests shall be performed on sections between valves or as ordered by the Engineer in accordance with latest AWWA Standard C-600, All equipment and labor for the hydrostatic test will be provided by the contractor. Tests will be made at 150 psi duration of two (2) hours. The section to be tested shall be slowly filled with water and the specified pressure applied by pump. Air shall be expelled from the pipe through house services or through taps made as may be necessary by the contractor. The section under initial specified pressure shall be allowed to "sit" for a period of two (2) hours or as ordered, by the Engineer. At the end of the period the pressure shall be restored to the 150 psi and the amount of water necessary to do so shall be measured to determine the leakage. Pressure tests shall be made after the backfill is complete. All parts of the work including house services shall be included in the pressure, leakage and disinfection tests. Before being placed in service and before certification of completion by the engineer, the entire work shall be disinfected with the accordance with the methods prescribed in the latest AWWA Standard C-651 with the exception of the tablet method, and/or as follows: A disinfectant mixture which will provide 25 mg/L residual of free chlorine shall be introduced into the system and a free chlorine residual of 10 mg/L will be maintained for at least 24 hours. The system shall be then drained and flushed. Bacteriological examination of water samples, collected after disinfection, shall be by the contractor. �Te Samples shall be taken at various points on the system as determined by the Engineer. If examination determines that the water is unfit for consumption, the disinfection process shall be repeated until potable samples are achieved. It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide a complete system free from contamination. II -3.19 Cleaning Up As the work progresses, the contractor shall clean up the streets and rights of way and the backfill shall be rounded within the limits of the excavation. Soft trenches shall be marked and protected with signs, and adequate lights, and subsequent settlement shall be promptly refilled. Upon the completion of the work, all dirt and rubbish shall be hauled to a dump provided by the contractor and the construction site left clean to the satisfaction of the engineer. All surplus materials furnished by the contractor and all tools and temporary structures shall be removed from the site by the contractor. II -3.20 Restoration and Maintenance of Pavement Dama ed Surfaces and Property The contractor shall restore or replace all removed or damaged paving, curbing, sidewalks, gutters, shrubbery, grass, fences, sod, or other disturbed surfaces or structures in a condition equal to that before the work began and to the satisfaction of the engineer and shall furnish all labor and material incidental thereto. In restoring improved surfaces, new pavement shall be laid, except that granite paving blocks, sound brick, or sound asphalt paving blocks may be reused. Pavement replacement shall be made in accordance with the requirements of other sections of the Contract Documents and in accordance with the specifications and directions of state or local municipal authorities have jurisdiction over the pavement. After the certification by the Engineer of the completion of the work, the contractor shall, unless it is otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, maintain the surface of unpaved trenches, and adjacent curbs and gutters, sidewalks, shrubbery, fences, sod, and other disturbed surfaces for a period of three (3) months thereafter. The contractor shall maintain, for one (1) year after certification of completion, areas that have been repaved and curbs, gutters and sidewalks that have been replaced, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents or required by state or local municipal officials having jurisdiction. All material and labor required for the maintenance of the trench surfaces and structures shall be supplied by the Contractor. The maintenance shall be done in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in the Contract Documents, no separate payment will be made for restoration and maintenance of pavement, damaged 20 f ti surfaces and property, but the cost thereof shall be included by the contractor in the item or items in the Schedule of Priced in the proposal covering the particular parts of the work, 21 SECTION Ill SANITARY SEWER PIPE EXCAVATION, BEDDING AND BACKFILL 1111 DESCRIPTION The work under this item shall consist of the satisfactory excavation, bedding, installation of the sanitary sewer pipe, special fittings, joint materials, backfill, compaction, and all materials necessary to construct the sanitary sewer as shown on the Contract Drawings and in the locations as described on these drawings or as ordered by the engineer. The sanitary sewer pipe shall be one of the pipes as indicated in the Contract Documents and bid proposal with no substitutions. The Contractors will furnish the necessary material, labor and equipment necessary to complete the job as described herein. All work incidental to the construction of sanitary sewers shall be included in the bid price of this Item unless specifically included in another Item under these Contract Documents. Trench excavation and backfill shall consist of the satisfactory removal of all material, necessary excavation, sheeting, sheathing, trench dewatering, appropriate temporary stream diversion, proper disposal of all excess or unsuitable trench material, necessary backfilling and the proper mechanical compaction for the construction of the work as shown on the accompanying Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer. 1112 MATERIALS 111-2.1 General The general construction methods employed by the manufacturer of the sanitary sewer pipe to be used under this project shall be subject to the approval by the Engineer. All Sewer pipe shall be manufactured by an organization of good reputation which has substantial experience in the manufacture of the specific type sewer pipe. The Contractor shall submit shop drawings to the Engineer for approval prior to ordering the pipe. The shop drawings shall consist of the manufacturer's name with the specific details including the type of joint construction of the pipe submitted. 22 The Engineer in charge reserves the right to have the specific manufacturer submit certifications of the individual materials used in the construction of the pipe. All tests done by ASTM, or any other approving agency will be made in the presence of the Engineer. Preliminary passings of tests at the manufacturer's plant or place of assembly shall not constitute final approval by the Engineer. Any pipe that is damaged in shipment, unloading or any other point and found to be defective prior to being incorporated into the project will be rejected. The Engineer reserves the right to reject an entire shipment of pipe should the sample from any shipment fail to meet the specifications as required herein. Any random testing shall be done at the request of the Engineer at the expense of the Contractor and/or the manufacturer of the pipe. Any necessary equipment, test material or other facilities will be provided by the Contractor and/or the pipe manufacturer. Design Data and Shop Drawings: The pipe supplier shall make available to the Contractor and/or the Engineer basic design data on the pipe and shop drawings of the specials and fittings. The supplier will also make available to the Contractor a pipe schedule indicating the sequence of installation of pipe, fittings, specials, and the elevations and stationing of the line at key points such as outlets, bends, and changes in grade. III-2,2PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe Scope This specification covers the requirement for Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings meeting: • ASTM D-3034, Standard Specification Type PSM Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Sewer Pipe and Fitting," SDR 35. (4" to 15") • ASTM F 679 Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Large Diameter Plastic Gravity Sewer Pipe and Fittings, (18" to 27"). • ASTM D 3212 Standard Specification for Joints for Drain and Sewer Plastic Pipes Using Flexible Elastomeric Seals. • Uni-Bell UNI B-4 recommended standard for integral bell, gasketed joint PVC sewer pipe and fittings (4" through 15"). 23 1 Uni-Bell UNI -B-7 recommended standard for PVC gravity sewer pipe and fittings (18" through 27"). III -2.3 Joining Systems Pipe Joints The pipe shall be joined with an integral bell, bell -and -spigot type rubber gasketed joint. Each integral bell joint shall consist of a formed bell complete with a single rubber gasket. Gaskets shall conform to ASTM F 477. Fitting Joints All fitting shall utilize rubber gasketed joints. III -2.4 Pipe The pipe shall be made of PVC plastic having a cell classification of 12454-B or 12454-C or 13343-C (with a minimum tensile modulus of 500,000 PSI) as defined in ASTM D 1784. Fittings The fittings shall be made of PVC plastic having a cell classification of 12454-C or 3343-C as defined in ASTM D 1784. Rework Material Clean rework material may be used so long as the pipe or fittings produced meet all the requirements of these specifications. Pipe Lengths 8", 10", 12", 15" and 18" Pipe Shall be available in standard laying lengths of 12 %' and 20'. 21", 24" and 27" Pipe Shall be available in standard laying lengths of 12' and 19 1/2'. 24 Pioe Dimensions PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe shall be furnished in the sizes and wall thickness shown in Table 1. III -2.5 Requirements Workmanship Pipe and fittings shall be homogeneous throughout and free from cracks, holes, foreign inclusions, or other injurious defects. The pipe shall be as uniform as commercially practicable in color, opacity, density, and other physical properties. Flattening There will be no evidence of splitting, cracking or breaking when the pipe is tested in accordance with Section III -2.6. Extrusion Quality Pipe shall not disintegrate or flake when tested in accordance with Section III -2.6. This test is intended only for use as a quality control test and not for use as simulated service test. 25 TABLE 1 Nominal Pipe Size (Inches) SDR Designation 0, D. (Inches) Wall Thickness Min. (Inches) 4 35 4.215 0.120 8 35 8.400 0.240 10 35 10.500 0.300 12 35 12.500 0.360 15 35 15.300 0.437 18 35 18.701 0.536 21 35 22.047 0.632 24 35 24.803 0.711 27 35 27.953 0.801 III -2.5 Requirements Workmanship Pipe and fittings shall be homogeneous throughout and free from cracks, holes, foreign inclusions, or other injurious defects. The pipe shall be as uniform as commercially practicable in color, opacity, density, and other physical properties. Flattening There will be no evidence of splitting, cracking or breaking when the pipe is tested in accordance with Section III -2.6. Extrusion Quality Pipe shall not disintegrate or flake when tested in accordance with Section III -2.6. This test is intended only for use as a quality control test and not for use as simulated service test. 25 Impact Resistance The impact resistance of PVC Sewer Pipe shall be determined in accordance with Section III -2.6 and shall comply with the requirements given in ASTM D 3034 or ASTM F 679. Pipe Stiffness Minimum "pipe stiffness" (FN) at 5% deflection shall be 46 PSI for all sizes when tested in accordance with ASTM D 2412. 1112.6 Test Methods Conditioning Condition the specimens prior to test as 73.4°F± 3.6° and 50% ± 5% relative humidity for not less that 24 hours unless such testing is for Quality Control purposes on the manufacturing line. t Flattgnin Flatten three specimens of pipe, 6 inches long, between parallel plates in a suitable press until 40% deflection is obtained. The rate of loading shall be uniform and such that the compression is completed within three minutes. On removal of the load, the specimens shall be examined for splitting, cracking or breaking. Extrusion Quaiit This test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM D 2152, "Test for Degree of Fusion of Extruded Poly (Vinyl Chloride) Pipe and Molded Fittings by Acetone Immersion." This procedure is used for determining the degree of fusion of PVC Plastic Pipe as indicated by reaction to immersion in anhydrous acetone. Impact Resistance This test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM D 244, "Test for Impact Resistance or Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings," be means of a tub (falling weight). Pipe Dimension Measurement shall be made in accordance with ASTM D 2122, "Determining Dimensions of Thermoplastic Pipe." 26 III -2.7 Marking Each length of pipe shall be marked with the following information: 4" to 15": Size, PVC cell classification, PSM, SDR -35, PVC Sewer Pipe, ASTM D 3034 and Code Number. 18" to 27": Size, PVC cell classification, PS 46, PVC Sewer Pipe, ASTM F 679 and Code Number. I11-2.8 Bedding Material Material shall conform to the requirements of sub -section 203-2.02, Type C for Select Granular Subgrade of the Standard Specifications of the New York State Department of Transportation with no particles greater than 4" in diameter. Select Granular Fill Material shall conform to the requirements of sub -section 203-2.02, Type C for Select Granular Fill and Select Structure Fill of the Standard Specifications of the New York State Department of Transportation. Select granular fill shall be placed in lieu of run of trench backfill as ordered by the engineer. Samples of the bedding material and select granular fill that the Contractor wishes to use shall be delivered to the site at least five (5) days before it shall be used so that an inspection may be able to be made by the Engineer and appropriate tests shall be able to be performed to check for size distribution. Run -Of -Bank Gravel Run of Bank Gravel shall mean a naturally occurring mixture of stones, and clayey and/or sandy soil particles, of varying sizes , which are generally the result of glacial deposition. Run -of -bank gravel shall be a well integrated mixture of somewhat spherically shaped and flattish type, round edged stones of like nature. No stones shall exceed four (4) inches in its greatest dimension. The material shall have not more than12% passing by weight for a No. 200 sieve size designation. Calors may vary depending on geographical locations. Run -of -bank gravel shall be free from overburden, refuse debris, plant growth, woody vegetation, organic substances, loan or silt, and such other deleterious materials. All run -of -bank gravel shall be approved by the Engineer prior to its use. 27 Foundation Stone (A.O.B.E) Material shall conform to the requirements Aggregates of the Standard Specifications of the Transportation. The stone shall be Size Designation 3 III -3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS of Section 703-02 - Coarse New York State Department of Installation shall be in accordance with ASTM D 2321-89 or its latest revision. The necessary trench excavation shall be made in accordance with the appropriate Contract Documents or as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor shall furnish, supply, and make part of the construction such bracing, sheeting, shoring, dewatering equipment, including the proper capacity pumps, the necessary manpower, and the necessary construction equipment and any other incidental equipment as may be necessary for the proper completion of the work, the protection of the adjacent properties, and the welfare and safety of the public, employees of the Contractor, and agents of the local public authority. The work shall be done in strict accordance with the current regulation of the applicable New York State Safety Code and any other local codes which may be applicable to the work being done under this Contract. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to excavate the trench to the proper line and grade. After the excavation is complete, the Engineer shall be notified to inspect the excavation and the character of the foundation material prior to the contractor installing any pipe or manhole. The length of the excavation open at one time shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet or any other length as the Engineer deems reasonable and necessary. Any rock excavation shall be carried out well in advance or the pipe to avoid any possible damage. All blasting operations shall be conducted in accordance with the applicable local and state ordinances. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to obtain any and all necessary permits to conduct any blasting operations whatsoever. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility at all times to keep the excavation free from standing water. The water shall be removed and disposed of by the Contractor to a satisfactory disposal point. This shall all be done at the contractor's expense to the complete satisfaction of the Engineer in charge. To this end, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to provide any necessary pumps, well points and any other necessary means for removing ground and/or surface water from the necessary excavation. The 28 Contractor shall sufficiently dewater all trenches to and elevation 6 below the invert of the pipe, to completely dry out and solidify the foundation for the proposed pipe to the necessary depth. The end result shall be to provide a firm, solid, completely dry foundation in which to lay the pipe. If during the course of the work, the Contractor exposes any sewer, drain, or other utility, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to complete his work without damaging or blocking the existing structure. Any damage to any utility or water course met during the course of the work, shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Engineer insuring that no damage be done to any homeowner or property owner. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to protect and maintain the newly constructed pipe at all times during construction. The Contractor shall be aware that prior to placement of the necessary backfill, the newly constructed pipe may be subject to forces causing the pipe to float. Any displacement of pipe or manhole structure as a result of inadequate drainage protection shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor. It will be his responsibility to restore the pipe to the proper line and grade with the proper bedding and backfill material. This shall be done without any additional expenses to the local public agency. It shall be noted that the contractor may not use the newly constructed pipe to dewater his trench. A plug must be kept in the open end of the pipe at all times to avoid ground and/or surface water from entering the pipe. If additional pumps and/or well points are necessary from time to time, the Contractor shall employ whatever equipment necessary to maintain the level of the water in the trench to meet the invert elevation of the pipe. Unless otherwise directed, no additional payment will be given to the contractor for the work of dewatering the trench as specified above. The cost of doing this work shall be included by the Contractor in whichever item he deems necessary. If the soil in the bottom of the trench is found to be unsuitable, the Engineer will order the Contractor to remove it and replace it with the appropriate foundation material. The foundation material may take the shape of bedding material or foundation stone or any other material as approved by the Engineer and will be placed by the Contractor only as directed by the Engineer. This is not to be construed as the bedding material as shown on the payment limit detail for the first six inched beneath the invert of the pipe. The intent of this section of specification is to provide for additional payment below the point of the six inch vertical projection from the invert of bottom of the pipe. The normal bedding shall be placed six inches beneath the pipe up to and including the top of the pipe. This bedding material shall be placed carefully in layers of four to six inches with each layer being tamped or compacted prior to the installation of the next layer. Care shall be taken that the bedding material is made compact and tight under 29 i the lower half of the pipe. The bedding material shall be carried the full width of the trench, however, payment limits shall be as shown in the trench detail. From the top of the pipe to a point one foot over the top of pipe, select granular fill material will be used. This fill will be placed in layers of not more than six inches and compacted prior to the installation of the subsequent layer. The method of compaction shall be discussed with the Engineer prior to the contractor employing it and will be subject to continual review by the Engineer in the Field. The remainder of the backfill shall be made with suitable run of trench material or gravel fill as ordered by the Engineer. This soil shall be compacted in lifts of no more than eight inches with an approved mechanical tamper. All areas along the side of the trench and behind sheeting and bracing shall be completely filled using whatever material is appropriate and compacted. Whatever material is used for backfill, it shall not be allowed to be dropped in the trench from a height greater than five feet from the top of the existing backfilled trench. This shall only be done after the sewer has been covered with two foot of select granular material. Any suitable material removed in making the excavation for the proposed sewer collection main shall be used for backfilling as shown on the Contract Documents. The backfill material will be free from large stones (Maximum Size 6") and any other deleterious material that would be suitable for trench backfill. Where in the opinion of the Engineer, the excavated material us unsuitable, the Contractor shall furnish and install select granular material as directed. No additional backfill shall be placed in the trenches until the Engineer has approved the material and its location. Any backfill placed in violation of the above, shall be ordered removed at the total expense of the Contractor. The site and adjacent areas of the work will be cleaned on a daily basis of all rubbish, excess material, and promptly restored to its original condition. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to maintain a neat and orderly job site. When the route of this pipe line runs through private properties via Town acquired rights-of-way, any work within these rights-of-way shall be restored as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of the Engineer, Municipality and Homeowner. Any work within State and/or County rights-of-way shall be restored as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of the Engineer, State and/or County Agencies. No separate payment will be made for any cleanup operation, however, its proper execution will be demanded by the Engineer in charge. 30 The sanitary sewer pipe incorporated into this project shall be the size, type, manufacture, and material construction as indicated in the Contract Documents or as shown in the bid proposal with no substitutions unless specifically approved in writing by the Engineer. All pipe will be set to the precise line and grade as indicated on the plans and profiles. The pipe shall be joined and bedded properly, free from defects and able to meet the appropriate infiltration and exfiltration test requirements. The pipe laying in general shall start at the downstream end and progress upstream with the bell or grooved end placed upstream. The sewer pipe shall be laid to the true line and grade by use of a construction laser. The laser equipment shall be furnished and operated by the Contractor who shall employ competent and licensed personnel. The method of laying the pipe to line and grade shall be reviewed by the Contractor and Engineer prior to starting; and at any time the Engineer deems necessary to insure that the pipe is laid to the proper line and grade. Any pipe that is found to deviate from this line and grade shall be removed and relayed at the Contractor's expense. Sufficient checks shall be made in order to determine the accuracy of the pipe as the pipe line progresses. Prior to the start of the job, the Contractor shall notify a representative of the manufacturer of the pipe that is being used. The manufacturer shall send an ample number of people and instructors to advise the Contractor and his men in the proper methods of laying the specific type of pipe. These specific methods shall be strictly adhered to by the Contractor. Proper care shall be made in the manner in which joints are set for the pipe. Immediately after the pipes are put together, the position of the rubber ring in the joints will be inspected to see if it has been properly sealed. Any gauges or instruments that are used to measure the joints after installation shall be furnished by the manufacturer to the Contractor and Engineer. All defective joints found shall be corrected immediately. Where the pipe connects to the outside face of a manhole wall or the outside face of any wall, or structure, there shall be a short section of pipe, four (4) feet minimum, seven (7) foot maximum, placed at a connection to the structure. In order to assist the representative of the Engineer in charge to oversee the pipe laying and other work, only one crew will be permitted to operate at any time under one inspector. 31 Hence, the number of crews and the number of locations where pipe may be laid will be limited by the numbers of Inspectors assigned by the Engineer. If the Contractor wishes to increase the number of crews, he must notify the Engineer at least five (5) days in advance so that an adequate number of Inspectors may be on the job site to insure the adherence of these specifications. The Contractor will furnish any necessary materials, tools, and labor to assist the Inspector. This specifically refers to any survey work the Inspector shall do. While the Inspectors, at times, may check the alignment and/or grade, the Contractors crew shall not be dependent upon the Inspector for performance of such work. This job will solely be the Contractor's responsibility to set the pipe to the appropriate line and grade. The Contractor shall also provide any necessary pumps, drains, well points and any other means of dewatering the trench, in accordance with the trench excavation and backfill. It shall be his responsibility to make the trench safe, in order that the workmen may perform the job accordingly. The pipe will be laid in a dry condition and joints will not be allowed to be made under water. If any time during the course of the work the inspector sees deviation from this requirement, he shall notify the Contractor immediately and the Contractor shall stop laying pipe and rectify the condition. Any pipe laid after the engineer's notification will not be included for payment under this Item. In general, the pipe shall be laid on a bedding material base and backfilled as shown on the Contract. Documents. Where the soil in the subgrade is found to be soft, newly filled earth, unstable or an unsuitable base for the proposed sewer or appurtenances, the Engineer, at his discretion, will order excavation to the required depth and width as he deems necessary and place foundation stone. The foundation stone required by the Contract Drawings, or as ordered by the Engineer, shall be brought carefully to the proper grade, tamped and compacted, as directed, and shaped for the barrel of the pipe or as called for in the Contract Drawings or as directed by the Engineer. The trench will be excavated to the proper line and grade as shown on the Contract Drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. Loose material will be removed from the excavation prior to laying the pipe. Pipe laying, in general, should start downstream and then progress upstream. Bedding material will then be placed to the depth required by the Contract Drawings for the bedding and compacted. The stone shall be shaped by hand just before the pipe is laid, and it shall conform as nearly as possible to the shape and grade of the outside of the lower part of the pipe barrel. The grade of the stone shall be measured and checked over the entire length of the pipe in order that the 32 J barrel of the pipe will be evenly supported over its entire length. The pipe must not be supported by the bell or any shims. The bed must be formed to the correct grade before the pipe is placed on it. After shaping the bedding material, the pipe will be laid accurately to the specific line and grade, pushed home against the end of the last pipe laid and held in position. Sufficient bedding material is then required to be placed on each side to hold the pipe in position when the joint is being made. The joint will then be made as prescribed by the manufacturer and inspected. After the pipe has been installed, additional bedding material, as required, shall be added, the full width of the trench, on both sides of the pipe, compacted and brought to the top of the pipe. From the top of the bedding material to a point one foot above the top of the pipe, the trench backfill will be select granular material as specified herein. This material will be laid in lifts of no greater than six (6) inches, with each lift being thoroughly compacted, prior to subsequent lifts, by means of a mechanical piece of equipment. The remaining area of the trench shall be backfilled with suitable run of trench to the existing grade, with the proper compaction methods being employed, In any trench being excavated through rock, the rock should be removed so there are no projecting points of the rock. The bottom of the trench will be filled with foundation stone as required and compacted prior to laying the pipe. The bedding material will be smoothed out to grade for the pipe in order that an even bed be made. After installing the select granular fill to a point one foot above the top of the pipe, the rock that was excavated from the trench may used for backfill. The only excavated rock used will be rock with dimensions smaller than three inches. Any additional rock that is excavated with dimensions larger than three inches will be removed from the job site by the Contractor at his own expense. Any proposed sanitary sewer will be constructed at least ten foot horizontally from an existing or proposed water main, with a minimum if eighteen inches vertical separation. Where this separation is impossible to obtain, the water main and sewer main shall be constructed of mechanical joint ductile iron pipe and shall be pressure tested for water tightness. This pipe shall be used ten feet on either side of the crossing. This detail is shown on the Contract Drawings and will be strictly adhered to by the Engineer in the field. Any special construction method for an individual type pipe chosen by the Engineer shall be followed by the Contractor. If a specific type of pipe required a specific method on installation or intricate method of joining, it shall be strictly adhered 33 to. The manufacturer's recommended installation practices shall be explained to the Contractor and followed through the entire course of construction. Proper care shall be taken by the Contractor to protect the pipe at all times. If any pipe is damaged through the backfill procedure, that pipe shall immediately be removed from project and a new pipe installed at the Contractor's expense. Various tests will be performed by the Contractor upon completion, installation and backfill of every section of the sanitary sewer, including the sanitary sewer manholes. Any test will. not be made until the job in completed, including interior completion of the manhole as specified. The first test that shall be made will be a visual inspection of the pipe and manholes to insure alignment and cleanliness. Any lights, equipment, or tabor necessary for this inspection will be provided by the Contractor. III -3.1 Backfill Procedures The primary zone of backfill material be placed in 6 to 8 inch layers uniformly on each side of the pipe and compacted to 90 percent standard Proctor. 1 The Secondary zone backfill material can vary in quality and compaction, depending on the stiffness of the pipe specified. The material shall not be compacted directly above the pipe until 6 inches of cover has been placed over the pipe. The entire pipe -zone backfill should be brought up uniformly on both sides of the pipe. In the process of backfilling the trench, care should be exercised to protect the pipe from falling rocks, direct impact of the compaction equipment, or other sources of potential damage. Rolling equipment or heavy tampers shall not be used to consolidate the final backfill until there is at least 30 inches of cover over the top of the pipe. Care should also be taken to avoid over compaction of the backfill which could result in excessive distortion. Pipe deflection during backfilling shall be kept within the allowable design parameters. III -4 TESTING III -4.1 Deflection A. All pipe runs shall be subject to deflection test. Test shall be conducted only after the final backfill has been in place at least thirty (30) days to permit stabilization of the soil -pipe system. 34 B. No pipe shall exceed a deflection greater than five (5%) percent. Correction shall be performed immediately. No additional compensation will be allotted. C. Engineer may elect to do a visual {lamp} test in lieu of using rigid ball or mandrel. D. A rigid ball or mandrel shall be used for the deflection test and shall have a diameter not less than ninety-five (95%) percent of the base inside diameter or average inside diameter: The pipe shall be measured in compliance with ASTM D 2122-98 Standard Test Method of Determining Dimensions of Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings. The test shall be performed without mechanical pulling devices. The Contractor shall assist the Engineer in making his test. Any foreign materials found in the pipe will be removed, and any defects such as broken pipe, cracked pipe, improperly installed gaskets, or visible leaks shall be corrected and the pipe reinstalled. III -4.2 Leakage All pipe runs and manholes shall be tested using one of the following accepted procedures. A. Infiltration: Test shall be performed on runs in which the Engineer determines that ground water is sufficiently high at the time of the test. Leakage through the pipe joints and the manhole wall shall NOT exceed one hundred (100) gallons per inch of diameter, per mile of pipe, per day. B. Exfiltration: Test shall be performed on runs in which the Engineer determines that ground water is not present at the time of the test. Test shall be conducted in which a head of water, at least four (4) feet higher than the crown of the pipe at the highest section of the work being tested, is maintained during the test. At no time shall this test be performed if the head difference between manholes is ten (10) feet or greater. Allowable leakage for exfiltration shall be the same as for infiltration. C. Air Test: Test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM F1417, C-828-86 & UNI -B-6. D. Vacuum Test: Test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM C1244-05 The Engineer shall designate the type of test to be performed due to varying soil conditions and water table within the proposed project. 35 All evident leaks shall be investigated and necessary repairs made to minimize leakage, regardless of total leakage as shown by test. Sewers will not be tested until at least two (2) weeks after installation. Should any test or any section of pipe fail the above mentioned tests, the Contractor shall, at his own expense, locate and repair the defective joints or pipe sections. After the repairs are completed, the line shall be retested to assure compliance with allowable loss. This requirement will be met for every section between manholes, and not deemed to be a cumulative average over several sections of pipe. The manholes shall also be made part of the infiltration/exfiltration tests and will be measured at the same rates. The exfiltration testing shall be made only in the sections where the sewer trench was dry during construction. Any necessary plugs will be furnished and installed by the Contractor at the lower manhole. The upper manhole will then be filled with four foot of water to the extent that any point within the sewer line has a minimum of four feet of head on it. The tests shall be run for a minimum of twenty-four hours with the amount of leakage measured and compared with the allowable. If any section fails, it shall be retested until the maximum amount of leakage is under the allowable. If this amount can not be reached, the Contractor shall take whatever action necessary to correct the defect and retest the pipe. If directed by the Engineer, the Contractor will also run an infiltration test on the sewer line. The infiltration test will be made on lines where the groundwater was evident during construction. The leakage into the pipe will be measured by the Engineer using an appropriate weir or measuring device. The Maximum allowable amount of infiltration will be as specified above and will be strictly adhered to. If that rate is exceeded, the Contractor shall find the source of the leak, repair the leak, and retest the pipe. The Contractor will supply the Engineer with the necessary plugs, and/or weirs to be utilized in this section of the test in order that the infiltration, if any, can be measured. III -5 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT Sanitary sewer pipe will be measured for payment by the actual number of linear feet of pipe, of the various sizes, types and classes, completed, accepted and measured in place along the invert of the pipe. The measurements will take place from center of manhole to center of manhole. kri Except as specifically noted, horizontal payment limits will be the actual width to which the material is removed except in no case shall the payment width be greater than two feet plus the nominal inside diameter of the circular pipe or one foot greater than the outside diameter of any sanitary sewer manhole. When rock is encountered, the Contractor shall strip it of the overlaying material, notify the Engineer in writing and allow ample time for proper measurement by the Engineer. If the Contractor fails to file such notice, the Engineer shall deem the rock elevation as the first time he sees the material in questions. Vertical payment limits shall be from a point six inches under invert of the proposed sewer main to a point even with existing grade. If the Engineer deems foundation material unsuitable for construction of sanitary sewer main, the Contractor shall excavate to sufficient depth. and place sufficient foundation stone to stabilize the trench bottom. This material will be deemed as extra for payment. Note that all payment limits are shown on the appropriate detail sheet and will be adhered to strictly. If the Contractor elects to excavate outside of these payment limits, he will do so at his own cost. Any material necessary to make up the difference will also be supplied and installed at the Contractor's expense. Payment for additional excavation and/or backfill material outside the Contract limits as shown will be made to the Contractor only upon written authorization from the Engineer in charge. Excavation, backfill, bedding material, and select granular fill will be included for measurement and payment under this Item. However, foundation stone will not be included under this item but in Items specified elsewhere in this document. The Contractor shall also keep in mind that no separate payment shall be made for any testing, work done on the pipe, and shall be included in the Unit Price Bid for Sewer Pipe, 111-6 BASIS OF PAYMENT The sanitary sewer pipe shall be paid for under the Contract Unit Price Bid per linear foot per size of pipe. The Price bid shall include all work as specified under this item including the excavation, bedding material, furnishing of the pipe, installation of the pipe, backfill, necessary testing and any other work incidental to the installation of pipe. 37 SECTION IV SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES — PRECAST CONCRETE IV -1 DESCRIPTION Work under this Item shall consist of furnishing and installing precast concrete, sanitary manholes or drop manholes to the lines and grades as shown on the plan or as ordered by the Engineer. The work shall include all necessary excavation, bedding material, select granular fill, backfill, compaction, appropriate precast concrete unit, cast iron frame and cover, poured in place, sanitary sewer invert, necessary water proofing and all other items incidental to the satisfactory performance of the work. IV -2 MATERIALS The materials to be used in the construction of the precast sanitary sewer manholes and precast concrete sanitary sewer drop manholes shall be equal to those indicated on the detail sheet of the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer in the field. Precast reinforced manhole sections and bases shall conform to the types and sizes as shown in the requirement of ASTM - C — 478-97. The manholes sections shall be joined with rubber gaskets in conformance with the provisions of ASTM section C -- 443-94. Building concrete brick and block will conform to the provisions of ASTM C — 55-99. IV -2.1 Manhole Castings As shown on the Construction Detail, the Contractor shall supply and install a heavy duty manhole frame and cover. Manhole covers and frames shall be Neenah Casting Pattern Number R-1556 or approved equals. Neenah Foundry Company Albany, new York Telephone Number (518) 458-2278 Fax, (518) 458-2280 38 Steps The Contractor shall supply and install in manhole steps. Steps shall conform to New York State Department of Transportation Standards Specification item 725-02.01. Steps shall be fabricated from one of the following. Ferrous Metal -steps shall conform to the following requirements: Malleable Iron Castings -Grade 35018, Subsection 715-09. Steel -ASTM A575, Grade M 1020, galvanized in accordance with Subsection 719-01, Type 1. The steps shall have a minimum cross sectional dimension of one inch, exclusive of any coatings placed on them. Non -Ferrous Metal -steps shall conform to the following requirements: Aluminum Castings -Alloy 356-T6, &715.03. Wrought Aluminum -6061-T6, 6005-T5 or 6351-T6, &715-04. When aluminum steps are used, the portion of the step which will be in direct contact with cement concrete mortar, shall be coated with Zinc Chromate Primer conforming to the requirements of Subsection 708-04 or shall be coated with bituminous material approved by the Materials Bureau. Reinforced Plastic -Steps shall consist of polypropylene or other plastic material meeting this specification. It may be extruded, cast, or molded into the standard size and shape manhole steps, having a steel core center for strength and shall be completely covered by the plastic molding for corrosion protection. The plastic material shall have the following characteristics: RESISTANCE TO SALT AND CAUSTIC SOLUTIONS -Resistance to the following solutions when submerged for 30 days: 10% Sodium Chloride 10% Hydrochloric Acid 10% Sodium Hydroxide 10% Sulfuric Acid FLOW POINT -A flow point of 325° F or greater. FLEXIBILITY -It shall remain flexible over a temperature range of -25°F to +250°F upon long aging, 39 FIRE RESISTANCE -it shall be non -burning, self extinguishing, or very slow burning. The Steel core shall be not less than '/z" diameter and shall have the following physical characteristics: Tensile Yield - Minimum - 40,000 PSI Tensile Strength - Minimum - 70,000 PSI The Plastic step, when cast into a concrete block to the proper depth, shall withstand a minimum load of 300 pounds applied on a one inch area in the center of the step without cracking or breaking the plastic coating, loosening the step in the concrete or permanently deforming the step. The steps shall be uniformly spaced as shown on the Drawings, and project evenly from the walls. Steps may be cast in the manhole at the time the sections are precast, or grouted into precast step pockets with a non -shrink grout. IV -3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS The Contractor shall excavate and set the precast concrete manholes to the lines and grades indicated on the plans. Areas where the contractor excavates below the proposed grades shall be corrected to the proposed grades with foundation stone and/or bedding material, whichever the Engineer deems necessary, at the Contractor's expense. In locations where the Engineer indicates unsuitable trench bottom conditions, the Contractor shall remove unsuitable material and replace with foundation stone. Installation shall be in accordance with ASTM C 891-83 or its latest revision. Precast concrete riser sections will be carried to below finished grade as shown on the details with the casting set to exact grade using no more than two courses of manhole brick or one course of manhole block. The precast concrete sections of manholes will be joined using O-ring gaskets and the joints shall be mortared in the inside and out with non -shrink mortar. The backfilling and compaction shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Item Sanitary Sewer Pipe Excavation, Bedding, and Backfill previously herein described. The Contractor will furnish and install the necessary materials to construct the invert for the Sanitary Sewer Pipe as indicated on the Contract Documents. All this work shall be done prior to any infiltration or exfiltration testing. Once the manhole is completed, including all necessary sealing, the section of pipe, including the manhole, will be subject to the appropriate tests. The acceptance of the manhole will be made only after a successful completion of the test. Any rehabilitative work that must be done 40 to obtain a satisfactory result of the test will be performed by the Contractor at his expense until a satisfactory test result is obtained, IV -4 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT The Contractor will be paid a Lump Sum Price for the construction of precast concrete sanitary sewer manholes, at the various depth classes as shown on the bid proposal, complete and accepted. The depth of the manhole shall be the total depth measured from the highest point of the grate or cover to the outlet pipe elevation. Please note that there are various depth classifications to categorize the relative difficulty of installation of the manhole. The Contractor will be paid for the number of manholes at the various classes as shown on the bed proposal. IV -5 BASIS OF PAYMENT The construction of the precast concrete sanitary sewer manholes will be paid for at the Contract Unit Price bid per manhole at the appropriate depth classification for the manhole as shown on the Bid Proposal. 41 SECTION V GREASE TRAP — PRECAST CONCRETE V-1 DESCRIPTION Work under this Item shall consist of furnishing and installing a precast concrete, 1,250 gallon grease trap to the line and grade as shown on the plan or as ordered by the Engineer. The work shall include all necessary excavation, bedding material, select granular fill, backfill, compaction, appropriate precast concrete unit, cast iron frame and cover, necessary water proofing and all other items incidental to the satisfactory performance of the work. V-2 MATERIALS The materials to be used in the construction of the precast concrete grease trap shall be equal to as indicated on the detail sheet of the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer in the field. Precast reinforced section and base shall conform to the type and size as shown in the requirement of ASTM - C —478-97. The grease trap section shall be joined with rubber gasket in conformance with the provisions of ASTM section C -- 443-94. Building concrete brick and block will conform to the provisions of ASTM C — 55-99. V -2A GREASE TRAP As shown on the Construction Detail, the Contractor shall supply and install a precast concrete 2,500 gallon grease trap. Grease Trap shall be Fork Miller Company, Inc. or approved equal. Fort Miller Company, Inc. PO BOX 98 Schuylerville, New York 12871 Telephone Number (518) 695-5000 Fax: (518) 695-4970 V-2.2 Manhole Castings As shown on the Construction Detail, the Contractor shall supply and install three {3} light duty manhole frame and cover. Manhole covers and frames shall be Neenah Casting Pattern Number R-1556 or approved equals. 42 Neenah Foundry Company Albany, new York Telephone Number (518) 458-2278 Fax: (518) 458-2280 V-3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS The Contractor shall excavate and set the precast concrete grease trap to the line and grade indicated on the plan. Areas where the contractor excavates below the proposed grade shall be corrected to the proposed grade with foundation stone and/or bedding material, whichever the Engineer deems necessary, at the Contractor's expense. In location where the Engineer indicates unsuitable trench bottom condition, the Contractor shall remove unsuitable material and replace with foundation stone. Installation shall be in accordance with ASTM C 891-83 or its latest revision. Precast concrete riser section will be carried to below finished grade as shown on the detail with the casting set to exact grade using no more than two courses of manhole brick or one course of manhole block. The precast concrete section of the grease trap will be joined using fuel and oil resistant grey butyl {CS -440 or equal} and the joint shall be mortared in the inside and out with non -shrink mortar. The backfilling and compaction shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of Item Sanitary Sewer Pipe Excavation, Bedding, and Backfill previously herein described. The Contractor will furnish and install the necessary materials to construct the grease trap as indicated on the Contract Documents. All this work shall be done prior to the exfiltration test. Once the grease trap is completed, including all necessary sealing, the grease trap will be subject to the appropriate test. The acceptance of the grease trap will be made only after a successful completion of the test. Any rehabilitative work that must be done to obtain a satisfactory result of the test will be performed by the Contractor at his expense until a satisfactory test result is obtained. V-4 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT The Contractor will be paid a Lump Sum Price for the construction of precast concrete grease trap, at the depth shown on the bid proposal, complete and accepted. The depth of the grease trap shall be the total depth measured from the highest point of the grate or cover to the bottom elevation. V-5 BASIS OF PAYMENT The construction of the precast concrete grease trap will be paid for at the Contract Unit Price bid as shown on the Bid Proposal. 43 �\A THE FORT MILLER CO., INC � �\\ PO BOX 98 PHONE: 95-50,287' 1500 to 3000 GALLON PHONE: (518) 695-5000 FAX: (5181695-4970 www.fortmiller.com HEAVY DUTY GREASE TRAP FORT MILLER CONCRETE: 4000 PSI REINFORCEMENT: ASTM A615 - GRADE 60 ASTM A185 - GRADE 60 ENTRAINED AIR: 5.0%-9,0% MEETS ASTM C890 - CE _�:� PIPE 'IOR'O' 6" 18" -, TYPICAL ,,-24"0 OPENING (TYPICAL) --151' SLIDE-iN BAFFLE TYPICAL 6'-0" 1500 & 2000 GAL. T-0" 2500 & 3000 GAL. NOTES: INLET AND OUTLET TEES SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. b SEE CHART I I I I 'L' I I I INLET AND OUTLET KNOCKOUTS PROVIDED FOR 6"0 PIPE. BAFFLE IS SEPARATE SLIDE -IN TYPE. • FUEL AND OIL RESISTANT GREY BUTYL IS REQUIRED (CS -440 OR EQUAL), DESIGN CASE 3 (TRAFFIC) 6102 B-31 ACRD DWG: e31 LIQUID INLET OUTLET INTEGRAL INTEGRAL OVERALL HEIGHT INTEGRAL INTEGRAL BAFFLE SIZE LEVEL HEIGHT HEIGHT TOP BASE TOP BASE (LBS) GALLONSHEIGHT L' I' O HEIGHT INSIDE OUTSIDE (LBS) (LBS) INSIDE INSIDE 1566 4p'-69 _9 il3 244, 3L -625r -6n Fr6w 1.1-498 X499 509+ 2000 _&I & ?`-9" 9'•9" `J`•8" 3`"6" 71"6" 8w is-,ew 10,496 49@9 P500 5'-2" 1 6-2" 1 V-11" 1 2'-10" 1 3'-4" 1 6'-2" T-4" 1 17,200 1 16,400 3200 6'=2"' 1 T-•2— I 6`-tr Y ffl" 1 -5-4 -T-1— I -& 26r6e 1 1+,466 1 5669•• 6102 B-31 ACRD DWG: e31 SECTION VI DIRECTIONAL BORING VI -1 DESCRIPTION There are two (2) directional borings, which shall be constructed for Adams Fairacre Farms. Crossing No. 1, is the installation of a eight (8") inch diameter gravity sewer main, Crossing No. 2, is the installation of a eight (8"} inch diameter water main. Theses two (2} crossings are located approximately 225' north of the intersection of US Route 9 and Fowlerhouse Road.. VI -2 CROSSING No. 1 — 8" GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER Crossing No. 1 is a directional drilling operation, the work under this item shall consist of the satisfactory excavation, construction of Boring and Receiving Pits � if required ), installation of 12" Fusible C-900 PVC/DR-18 casing, installation of 8" Fusible C-900 PVC/DR-25 sewer main, dewatering of pits, dismantling of Boring and Receiving Pits, backfilling and all materials necessary to construct the cased crossing as r shown on the Contract Drawings and at the location as described on these drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. VI -2.1 MATERIALS A. CASING PIPE — 12" PVC/DR-18 Fusible PVC, Butt -Fused Joints (C-900 Fusible PVC) B. CARRIER PIPE -- 8" PVC/DR-18 Fusible PVC, Butt -Fused Joints (C-900 Fusible PVC) C. CASING SPACERS — Advance Products & Systems, Inc. Tel: 1-800-315-6009 Or Approved Equal. D. CASING ENDS — 12" x 8" Flex -Seal Coupling Fernco, Inc. Tel: 1-800-521-1283 Or Approved Equal. 45 VI -2.2 CROSSING No. 2 — 8" WATER MAIN Crossing No. 2 is a directional drilling operation, the work under this item shall consist of the satisfactory excavation, construction of Boring and Receiving Pits { if required ), installation of 12" Fusible C-900 PVC/DR-18 casing, installation of 8" Fusible C-900 PVC/DR-18 water main, dewatering of pits, dismantling of Boring and Receiving Pits, backfilling and all materials necessary to construct the cased crossing as shown on the Contract Drawings and at the location as described on these drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. VI -2.3 MATERIALS A. CASING PIPE — 12" PVC/DR-18 Fusible PVC, Butt -Fused Joints {C-900 Fusible PVC} B. CARRIER PIPE — 8" PVC/DR-18 Fusible PVC, Butt -Fused Joints {C-900 Fusible PVC} C, CASING SPACERS — Advance Products & Systems, Inc. Tel: 1-800-315-6009 Or Approved Equal. D. CASING ENDS — 12" x 8" Flex -Seal Coupling Fernco, Inc. Tel: 1-800-521-1283 Or Approved Equal. VI -2.4 CONSTRUCTION METHODS Stage one - A steerable drill head bores a pilot hole to a pre -designated point. Staff — The drill head is removed and replaced with a reamer to help open the path. A swivel is inserted between the reamer and the product {12" PVC/DR-18 Fusible, CASING PIPE} to be installed to allow the reamer to rotate without twisting the product. At this point the entire assembly is pulled back through the pilot hole to the entry pit. Stage three — 8" PVC/DR-18 Fusible CARRIER PIPE {Water Main), 8" PVC/DR-18 (Sewer Main) is installed. Stage four — The carrier pipe shall be secured against movement by the installation of casing spacers 6' O.C. Stage five — Both ends of the casing pipe shall have Two (2) 8" x 4" Fernco Couplings to seal off the casing pipe. 46 VI -2.5 Alignment and Grade All construction shall conform to the required lines and grades. No deviation shall be made from the required line or grade except with the written consent of the Engineer. Wherever obstructions not shown on the Contract Drawings are encountered during the progress of the work and interfere to such an extent that an alteration of the line and/or grade is required, the engineer shall have the authority to order a deviation from the line and grade. If the change in line and/or grade results in work beyond that required by the Contract Documents, compensation for such additional work will be made as specified elsewhere in the Contract Documents. Deviation form the line and grades shown on the Contract Drawings or established by the Engineer shall be corrected at the expense of the contractor. VI -3 Rock Excavation in Boring & Receiving Pits The word "rock" wherever used as the name of an excavated material, shall mean solid ledge rock and masonry and boulders which, in the opinion of the engineer, requires for its removal drilling and blasting, wedging, sledging or barring, or breaking up with a power operated hand tool. No soft or disintegrated rock or boulders which can be removed with a hand pick or power -operated excavator or shovel, no loose, shaken or previously blasted rock or broken stone in rock fillings or elsewhere; and no rock exterior to the minimum limits of measurement allowed, which may fall into the excavation will be measured for payment. Large rock and boulders shall be removed to provide a clearance of at least six (6) inches below and nine (9) inches on each side of all pipe, fittings and special structures. The specified minimum clearances are the minimum clear distances which will be permitted between any part of the pipe and appurtenances being laid or structures being built and any part, projection or point of such rock, boulder or stone. Where excavation is made in rock or boulders to the clearance specified above, the backfill to subgrade shall be made with an approved material, The layers shall be thoroughly tamped 6" max. lifts, to the satisfaction of the Engineer so as to provide a uniform and continuos bearing and support for the pipe and/or structures. The finished subgrade shall be prepared accurately by means of hand tools. The hours of blasting, if permitted, shall be fixed by the Engineer, NYSDOT and The Town of Wappinger. Any damage caused by blasting shall be repaired by the Contractor at his expense. The contractor's procedures and methods of blasting shall conform to State and local laws and to municipal ordinances. 47 The code of the Association of General Contractors of American Manual of Accident Prevention in Construction must be followed. The contractor, in addition to observing all laws and ordinances relating to the storage and handling of explosives, shall also conform to any further regulations which the Engineer may deem necessary in this respect. When rock is removed by blasting, it shall be removed at least thirty (30) feet in advance of the laying of pipe or construction of structures. When an existing pipe, conduit or structure intersects or comes within five (5) feet of the line of the trench, any rock necessary to be excavated for a distance of five (5) feet in the clean, on each side of the existing pipe, conduit, or structure shall, in all cases, be removed without blasting. The contractor shall be held responsible for and shall make good any damage caused by blasting or accidental explosions. Rock shall be measured for payment by the engineer. If the engineer deems it necessary, the trench shall be stripped of earth in sections prior to blasting or removal so the profiles or sections may be measured. Any rock removed and/or trench with rock excavation backfilled before measurement will not be paid for. Material from rock excavation may be used as backfill only in conformance with the following requirements: the backfill shall not contain stones or rock more than nine (9) inches in their largest dimension and backfill shall not contain more than 50 percent rock. All rock shall be uniformly distributed throughout the backfill; nesting of rocks will not be permitted. Material from rock excavation which is not suitable for backfill, as determined by the engineer, shall be removed from the site. Suitable backfill material acceptable to the engineer shall be substituted for the unsuitable rock material. Removal of unsuitable rock excavation material and furnishing and placing of suitable backfill shall be accomplished by the contractor at his expense. Ledge rock or solid masonry, requiring blasting, wedging, sledging, or barring, or breaking up with a power operated hand tool for its removal shall be estimated as rock excavation and paid for as provided elsewhere herein. Boulders over one (1) cubic yard in size will be classified as rock excavation. VI -4 ROCK EXCAVATION IN DIRECTIONAL BORING VI41 DESCRIPTION The work under this item shall consist of the satisfactory removal of solid ledge rock within the limits that are necessary to place the casing pipe under the highway as shown on the contract drawings and at the location as described on these drawings or as ordered by the Engineer. The Contractor will furnish all necessary material, labor and equipment to complete the job as described herein. VI -5 Testing Upon completion of the Directional Borings, pressure leakage test shall be made on the 8" water main & 8" sewer main and their appurtenances. Pressure tests shall be performed as follows: 1. 8" PVC/DR-18 Sewer Main— Sewer Main shall be tested in accordance with AWWA C605-05, test pressure shall bet 50 psi for two (2) hours. 2. 8" PVC/DR-18 Water Main— Water Main shall be tested in accordance with AWWA C605-05, test pressure shall bel50 psi for two (2} hours. The section water main under initial specified pressure shall be allowed to sit for a period of two (2) hours or as ordered by the Engineer. At the end of the period the pressure shall be restored to the 150psi and the amount of water necessary to do so shall be measured to determine the leakage. Before sanitary sewer main or water main can be placed in service, the Engineer shall certify test to Dutchess County Department of Health. Testing is not permitted until at least two (2) weeks after installation. Should any section of pipes fail the above mentioned tests, the contractor shall at his own expense locate and repair the defective joints or pipe sections. After repairs are complete, the line shall be retested to assure compliance with allowable loss. VI -6 CONSTRUCTION METHODS Rock encountered shall be removed in such a manner that no damage is done to overhead structures, i. e, by drilling, wedging, sledging or breaking up with power operated hand tools. Blasting shall NOT BE PERMITTED. All loose rock external to the required clearance shall be removed, and all voids grouted. Excavated rock shall be removed from the excavation without damage to the casing and disposed of by the Contractor. VI -7 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT The work will be measured for payment by the actual number of cubic yards of rock removed within the payment limits as indicated herein or as directed by the Engineer. 49 VI -S BASIS OF PAYMENT This work will be paid for at the contract unit price per cubic yard for "Rock Excavation in Directional Boring". Payment shall be made for the actual number of cubic yards measured before excavation, that would have to be removed if excavation had been made elsewhere to a dimension equal to the outside diameter, (O.D.) of the casing pipe. 50 Fusible PVCTm Underground Solutions, Inc. (UGSI) is an infrastructure technology and pipeline rehabilitation company. UGSI has developed and continues to develop unique and proprietary technologies focused on the underground In- frastructure industry, including its line of Fusible PVCTO pipe products. Fusible C-900®, Fusible C-905® and FPVCTm provide the only available method of installing a continuous, monolithic, gasket -free PVC pipe or con- duit system capable of being used in numerous trenchless or conventional direct bury applications. Applications include pressure and non -pressure installations in the water, sewer, electrical, industrial and telecommunica- tions industries. Fusible PVCTm has been fused and installed at numerous sites throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico.o 5® PVCTM 1.0 1i • Trenchless • Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) • Sliplining • Pine Burstina • Bret grary . —r•F..,--..-.,-. • Water Mains (AWWA C900, C905) • Sewer - Gravity and Force Mains • Process and Raw Water • Water Recycle and Reclaim • Storm Drains • :;wn�tuit: Fusible pVC�'" Product Lines Meet: • AWWA C9001C905 requirements • NSF -61 certification is ASTM cell classification 12454 • PPI TR -2 formulation requirements Fusible C 900 , Fusible C-90 , F UGSI's Fusible C-900®, Fusible C-905 and FPVC1 pipe are the only fusible polyvinyl chloride pipe systems in the world. Fused PVC pipe with fully restrained joint integrity means that our cost-effective, patent pending installation techniques such as horizontal directional drill- ing, sliplining, pipe bursting and direct bury are now even more economical for both pressure and non -pressure applications. UGSI combines the mechanical properties of PVC with UGSI's innovative, patented butt fusion technology. With an industry design life of 100+ years, these products are available in sizes ranging from 3" to 36" with larger sizes in development. Our proprietary PVC formulation, pat- ented fusion process, licensing and training program, and installation experience allow for the consistent, reliable fusion of Fusible C-900®, Fusible C -90e and FPVCTm to create monolithic, restrained pipe systems of unparal- leled strength. F >tu $ Ito • Moriohtt5id'fully-restra�n+sd pipe systems • Gasket -free and leak- f ee joints • Uses readily available standard waterworks fittings • PVC is the most widely accepted material placed into water systems today • Greater pull force rating than HDPE • Greater pull force rating than other PVC systems • Reduced wall thickness relative to HDPE yields more flow and less material for given pressure class • Lower installation costs versus HDPE due to lighter weight and reduced OD dimensions Fusible C-900°• Fusible C-905® • FPVCTM Fusible PVC TM Pipe Dimensional Data DI PS Size O.D. DR Wall I.D. Wt Safe Pulling Size O.D. DR (in.) (in.) (lb/ft) Force (lbs.) 3" 3,5" 14 .34 4.11 3.0 13,400 4" 4.80" 18 .27 4.27 2.5 10,600 10" 10.50" SDR 35 25 .19 4.42 1.8 7,700 4" 4.50" 1 14 .49 5.91 6.5 27,700 6" 6.90" 18 .38 6.13 5.2 21,900 17.63 20.3 25 .28 6.35 3.8 16,000 6" 6.63" 14 .65 7.76 11.2 47,700 8" 9.05" 18 .50 8.04 9.1 37,800 25 .36 8.33 6.5 27,600 8" 8;.63" 14 .79 9,51 17.0 71,800 10" 11.10" 18 .62 9,87 13.6 56,800 25 .44 10.21 9.8 41,600 10" 10.75" 14 .94 11.31 24.1 101,600 12" 13.20" 18 .73 11.73 19.3 80,300 25 .53 12.14 13.8 58,800 12 1275 18 .85 13.60 26.1 108,000 14" 15.30" 21 .73 13.84 22.5 93,400 25 1 61 14.081 19.2 1 79,000 14" 14.00" 18 .97 15.47 34.0 139,700 16" 17.40" 21 .83 15.74 29.2 120,800 25 .70 16.01 25.0 102,200 16" 16,00" 18 1,08 17.33 43.2 175,400 18" 19.50" 21 .93 17.64 36.8 151,700 25 .78 17.94 31.7 128,400 18" 18.00" 18 1.20 19.2052.5 24.8 215,300 20" 21.60" 21 1.03 14.54 45.3 186,100 25 .86 19.87 39.1 157,500 20" 20.00" 18 1.43 22.93 76.4 307,100 24" 25.80" 21 1.23 23.34 65.3 265,600 25 1.03 23.74 55.8 224,800 E24�M24" 25 1.28 29.44 86.4 345,800 30" 32.00" 32.5 .99 30.03 67.1 268,700 41 .78 30.44 53.8 214,200 25 1.53 35.24 124.2 495,400 36" 38.30" 32.5 1.18 35.94 97.0 384,600 41 .93 36.43 77.2 306,900 Bal NAI In`g Force: Based on a maximum of 7,000 psi with a safety factor of 2.5. Coefficient of Expansion: General Rule - 0 3"1100 ft of,p�pe/10°F change. im terrsperatyre Fuslble:,C JDeand'FPVtaT�' alre:avMablw III a war etiy of colors including: Blue for potable water Green for wastewater Purple for recycle, reclaim or reuse White,for raw water & storm water, ry fttr eleotrieateonduit Specifications for other sizes available upon request. Pipe is available in 20', 30' and 40' lengths. IPS SEWER Wall J.D. Wt Safe Pulling Size O.D. DR (in.) (in.) (lbift) Force (Ibs.) 3" 3,5" Sch. 80 .30 2,90 2,0 8,400 9,600 ,. 8" Sch. 40 .22 3.06 1.5 6,300 10" 10.50" SDR 35 ch"603:4 9.90 3, 3:0 ` 12,400 4" 4.50" 1 Sch 40 '.24 4,02: 2.1 S 900' .44 j:"QR:RPs 13.8. 1:7 1241& 18" . I.A. .54 17.63 20.3 Sch. 80 .435.77 22.05" SDR 35 5.5 23,400 6" 6.63" Sch. 40 .28 6.07 3.6 15,600 150,600 27" DR 26 .26 6.11 3.3 14,500 Sch, 84 50 763. 8,4 35;700 8" 8;.63" ill? 2S 33 .7.97 5.7." 24,QR0. Sch 40 32 T'095.5 :: 23,3U0 Sch, 80 .59 9.57 12.4 52,700 10" 10.75" DR 26 .41 9.93 8.8 37,200 Sch. 40 .37 10.01 7.7 33,700 Sch 809 11 3.7 73' 12 1275 DR 26 d49 11:77, 12,4; 52,$00 Sch .40 41 11.93 1.0.2 44,600 Sch. 80 .75 12.50 20.9 87,400 14" 14.00" DR 26 .54 12.92 15.3 63,900 Sch. 40 .44 13.12 12.1 52,400 Sch a0 84 14:32 26.8 112,000 16" 16,00" 'bR'26 62 : 1 :76 , 20.6 83,800 Sch: 40 .50 .15:00 15.0 68,100 Sch. 80 .94 16.12 33.5 141,000 18" 18.00" DR 26 _69 16.62 24.8 105.000 Sch. 40 .56 16.88 20.8 85,900 Sch'.80 11.03 17.84 41.0 171,800 20" 20.00" OR 20 ,77 18,46 31.2 130,200 Sch a0 :5$ : 18:82 23.9 1 o0;7Q0. Sch. BO 1.22 21.56 58.2 244,4Q0 E24�M24" DR 26 .92 22.16 44.7 186,700 Sch. 40 .69 22.62 33.2 141,400 Sewer pipe sizes also available in SDR 26. Visit our website, www.undergroundsolutions.com, for additional technical details and specifications. Fusible C -90e • Fusible C-905 ' . FPVCT"' i SEWER Size O.D. DR Wan (in.) I.D. (in.) Wt (Iblft) Safe Pulling Force (lbs.) 4" 4.22" SDR 35 .12 3.98 1.1 4,300 6" 6,28" SDR 35 .18 5.92 2.3 9,600 ,. 8" 8.40" SDR 35 .24 7.92 4.1 17,200 10" 10.50" SDR 35 .30 9.90 6.4 26,900 12", 12,50" SDR 35 .36 11.78 9.2 38,400 15" 15.30 SDR 35 .44 14.43 13.8. 57,100 18" 18.70" SDR 35 .54 17.63 20.3 85,600 21" 22.05" SDR 35 .63 20.78 29.3 119,000 24" 24.80" SDR 35 .71 23.38 37,3 150,600 27" 27.95" SDR 35 .80 26,35 44.4 191,300 Sewer pipe sizes also available in SDR 26. Visit our website, www.undergroundsolutions.com, for additional technical details and specifications. Fusible C -90e • Fusible C-905 ' . FPVCT"' i Fusible PVC"11 Pressure Ratings Bend Radius Dimension Pressure Ratio (psi) Fusible C-900" 14 200 Pressure 25 100 Dimension Pressure DIPS Ratio (psi) Pressure Size Ratio (psi) 144 ft. 21 200 Fusible C-905® 10" 25 165 i 275 ft. 14" 41 100 Sch.80 320 4 IPS DIPS Dimension Pressure Size Ratio (psi) 144 ft. S. 189 ft. 10" 231 ft. i 275 ft. 14" „ Sch.80 320 4 Sch.40 220 450 ft. 24" 538 ft, 30" 667 ft. 36" 798 ft. 1.38 0.95 Hydrostatic Design ASTM 0-2837 a" Sch.80 250 Basis at 73°F Sch. 40 160 K -3D 3 1 "t y Linear Expansion ASTM D-696 0.3x10" Sch. 60 230 12" Sch. 46 130 Sch.80 220 16" Sch. 40 130 D„ Sch, 80 220 20" Sch. 40 120 t4 h 221 Q:Sb { + 4 01 :. t)1 All DR 26 160 Bend radius is based on the outside diameter of the pipe. PVC vs. HDPE DIPS Size Minimum Bend Radius 4" 100 ft. 6" 144 ft. S. 189 ft. 10" 231 ft. 12" 275 ft. 14" 319 ft. 16" 363 ft. 18" 406 ft. 20" 450 ft. 24" 538 ft, 30" 667 ft. 36" 798 ft. Bend radius is based on the outside diameter of the pipe. PVC vs. HDPE IPS Size Minimum Bend Radius 3" 73 ft. 4" 94 ft.. 6" 138 ft. 2.3X 18.0 ft. 10" 224 ft. 1 266 ft. 14" 292 ft. 2,800 333 ft; 18" 375 ft. 160 417 ft. 24" 500 ft. Bend radius is based on the outside diameter of the pipe. PVC vs. HDPE Property Specification PVC HDPE Diff. Tensile Strength ASTM D-638 7,000 3,000 2.3X (psi) Wall thickness (in.) 1.03 2.73 165% Safe Pulling Stress 23.7 2,800 1,100 2.5X (psi) 160 3% Weight (lbs/ft) 56.2 Specific Gravity 81% 1.38 0.95 Hydrostatic Design ASTM 0-2837 4,000 1,600 2.5X Basis at 73°F Coefficient of Linear Expansion ASTM D-696 0.3x10" 1.2x10" 0.25X InAn. deg F 24" I.D. 24" PVC DR 25 30" PE DR 11 % Change O.D. (in.) 25.8 30.0 16% Volumetfoot (f3) 3.65 4.91 35% Wall thickness (in.) 1.03 2.73 165% 1.D. (fn.) 23.7 24.5 3% Pressure rating (psi) 165 160 3% Weight (lbs/ft) 56.2 101.9 81% Fusible PVC"" uses standard DIPS fittings. Fusible C -90e • Fusible C-905® • FPVC rm 2150.00• KOPE !2125.00" 023.70" ?124.50" PVc 24" DR 25 Fusible C-905"vs, 30" DR 11 HDPE Fusible PVC71' The Patented UndergroundrcSolutlonSTm Fusion Pro ...... cess Fusible C-900®, Fusible C -90e and FPVCTm have distinctive properties allowing for full strength butt fusion joints. While other thermoplastic materials have been fused routinely, the LIGS1 PVC fusion proc- ess incorporates a proprietary PVC formulation and a unique combination of heat, pressure and time, using slightly modified industry standard fusion machines. Fusion is performed by LIGSI technicians and/or licensed and trained contractors. The patented fusion process con- sists of the following steps:.', 1. Pipe ends are precisely and securely aligned. 2. The fusion machine's dual cutting head faces and squares both ends of the PVC pipe simultaneously. 3. An electronically controlled heating element heats in preparation for fusion bonding the ends of the pipe form- ing a bead of fusible material. 4. After the pipe ends have been heated and the proper bead has developed, the heater plate is removed, and the pipe ends are brought together and held under pres- sure until the newly -formed joint cools. 5. The fusion process creates an external and internal bead on the pipe joint. 6. The external and/or internal beads can be removed for trenchless applications. The bead removal process does not affect the joint strength. All fusion times are comparable to other thermoplastic materials. All joints are fully restrained. Testing performed in accordance with ASTM D-638 methods, demonstrates that the tensile strength of the fused f joint equals the tensile strength of the pipe. Pipe Specifications 1. Meets AWWA C900, AWWA 0905, NSF -61 and ASTM cell classification 12454. ! 2. Available in DIPS and IPS sizes. 13. Extruded typically in 20', 30' and 40' lengths. Custom lengths are also available. 4. Extruded with a unique patent -pending formulation that meets all requirements of PPI TR -2 (PVC Range Composition Listing of Qualified Ingredients). 5. Recommended limits of ovality are 5% for pressure applications and 7.5%x: for non -pressure applications. 6. Has excellent abrasion and scratch -resistant properties. 7. Continuous pull -in lengths of over 5,100 LF have been achieved. Fusible PVC'm is the Most Tested PVC Pipe in the Industry with Four Levels of Quality Control to Help Ensure Flawless Installations Fusible PVCTM flattening test in progress. I Fusible C-900'' • Fusible C-905°' • FPVC TM I 6401 0 U681 Lot Fusion Test Cote Has Ye-"' j' Qualifioabon Vendor Acceptance ita OC Rata . Collection Testing. Tes:!<rtg .Reke4tion AWWA C900 • • • AWWA C905 • • • Extrusion Quality • • • Mechanical • • Properties Process Control • Points Trained and • Licensed operators Fusible PVCTM flattening test in progress. I Fusible C-900'' • Fusible C-905°' • FPVC TM I TM Installations The Underground Solutions"m patented fusion process allows for the consistent, reliable fusion of our Fusible C- 900®, Fusible C-9050 and FPVCTM pipe. Fusible PVC11A pipe installed using our patent pending installation techniques provides the perfect solution for trenchless and direct bury installations. Fusible C-900®, Fusible C- 90eand FPVCTM' pipe has a wide geographical installation base. HDD in Beaufort, SC Sliplining in Pittsburgh, PA Sliplining in King County, WA Pipe Bursting in Orange County, FI - Direct Bury in Danville, CA HDD in Collier County, Fl_ Contact Us With offices nationwide and an unmatched record of achievement in the water Industry, the Underground Solutions team is poised to provide the very best in infrastructure services and technologies. For more information, please contact us at: Underground Solutions, Inc. OR Underground Solutions, Inc. 13135 Danielson Street, Suite 201 230 Executive Drive, Suite 110 Poway, CA 92064 Cranberry Twp, PA 16066 Phone: 858-679-9551 Phone: 724-353-3000 Fax: 858-679-9555 Fax: 724-353-3020 www.unLergroundsolutions.com • Engineering support • Budget preparation • Project planning • Fusion services & training Underground Solutions, Inc. (UGSI) provides Infrastructure technologies for water/wastewater applications, and conduit for applications ranging from electrical to fiber optics. UGSI's Fusible PVC'" products, including Fusible C-900*, Fusible C-905* and FPVCTM, contain a proprietary PVC formulation that, when combined with UGSI's patented fusion process, results in a monolithic, fully restrained, gasket -free, leak -free piping system. UGSI's DuralinerT"r is a patented, close -fit pipeline renewal system creating a stand-alone structural liner. Urlerground Solullons'", Fusible PVC"', Fusible C-900*, Fusible C-905* and FPVC' are trademarks or Underground Solutr ions, Inc. ume o piro u nd Underground Solutions, Inc. does business in California as UGSI. Inc. i�lr _ W001 Underground Solulions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. L Fusible C-900®• Fusible C-905* • FPVCTM SECTION VII ROCK EXCAVATION VII -1 DESCRIPTION Rock excavation shall consist of the removal of all materials necessary for the installation of the proposed Sanitary Sewer and Force Main Excavation, dewatering and satisfactory disposal of all surplus or unsuitable material necessary for the construction of the work in the locations and to the dimensions as shown on the Contract Drawings or as directed by the Engineer, shall be in accordance with these Specifications. The payment limit for said rock excavation shall not exceed two (2) feet plus the inside diameter of the pipe, including six (6") inches below bottom of the pipe, and one (1) foot clear around the manholes as shown on the Contract Drawings, VII -2 MATERIALS NOT APPLICABLE. VII -3 CONSTRUCTION METHODS Rock excavation shall comprise of solid rock in the original bed or well-defined ledges, which can only be removed by continuous blasting and for continuous drilling or use of jackhammers, and shall include all boulders or detached pieces of rock one-half cubic yard or more in size. Concrete paving, or other types of permanent paving, sidewalks, walks, curb and butters, will not be considered as rock excavation. Frozen material will not be considered as rock excavation. In the event that rock is encountered, the Engineer will take cross sections of the rock uncovered. The Contractor shall not proceed with the excavation of the material claimed as rock until this material has been cross-sectioned and classified by the Engineer. The classification of material as "rock excavation" will be determined by the Engineer, Failure on the part of the Contractor to uncover such material, notify the Engineer and allow ample time for cross -sectioning the undisturbed surface of such material, will forfeit the Contractor's right -of -claim to any classification other than that allowed by the Engineer for the areas of the work in which such deposits occur. A project meeting relative to the method, manner and procedure of blasting operations shall be hold at the site with the Engineer, and Contractor, and the representatives of all interested agencies, prior to the commencement of drilling, 57 blasting and hammering operations. The contractor shall in addition to these specifications, adhere to chapter 80: Blasting of the Town of Wappinger Code. Whenever explosives are used, they shall be of such character and strength and in such amounts as is permitted by the state and local laws and ordinances and all respective agencies having jurisdiction over them. In special cases, the right is reserved for the Engineer and those agencies to specify the maximum size of the charges. Blasting shall be done only at such time as the Engineer and those agencies shall approve and under such restrictions as they may impose. The Contractor shall employ only experienced supervisors and workmen for the handling, loading, and firing of the explosives. The blasting crew supervisor shall be licensed in the State of New York to utilize explosives in a blasting operation. The Contractor's attention is directed to the requirements of Industrial Code Rule 39 of the State of New York Department of Labor, Board of Standards and Appeals, and the applicable Selections of the Labor Law, which together with the conditions indicated herein, shall provide for the possession, handling, storage, and transportation of all explosives used at the sits. No person shall discharge explosives in the ground nor shall any person other than a state, county, city, town or village employee regularly engaged in the maintenance and repair thereof excavate any existing street, highway or public place, unless notice thereof, in writing shall have been given at least 72 hours in advance to the person, corporation or municipality engaged in the distribution of gas, electricity, steam or water, or the provision of telephone or telegraph service in such territory. The person having direction or control of such works shall five such notice and further he shall ascertain whether there is within 100 feet in such street, highway or public place, or in the case of the proposed discharge, any pipe of any other person, corporation or municipality conveying combustible gas, and if there by any such pipe he shall also give such notice to any such other person, corporation or municipality. Provided, however, that in any emergency involving danger to life, health or property, it shall be lawful to excavate without using explosives if the notices prescribed herein are given as soon as reasonably possible, and to discharge explosives to protect a person or persons from an immediate and substantial danger of death or serious personal injury if such notices are given before any such discharge is undertaken. Any such work shall be performed in such manner as to avoid damage to any utility facilities. If in the course of any such excavation, blasting or other work, damage or the potential thereof is occasioned to any utility facility used in the transmission or distribution of gas, electricity, water, steam, telephone or telegraph, whether by direct contact, undermining of soil or other support thereof, or otherwise, the person having direction or control of such work shall promptly take all reasonable measures necessary to protect individuals and the public from loss or the potential thereof and shall 58 immediately notify the person, corporation or municipality owning or operation such utility of such damage or potential damage to its facilities. Neglect on the part of the person having direction or control of such works, responsible for any damage or potential damage to such facilities (a) to promptly take all reasonable measures or (b) to immediately notify the Owner or operator of the utility facility involved or damaged or potential damage to his facilities, damage to its facilities, occasioned by such person or under his direction or control, shall be a violation of this section and constitute a misdemeanor. Nothing herein contained shall preclude or prevent recovery or monetary damages by the Owner or by any other person suffering damage from the disruption of utility services occasioned by excavation, blasting or other work in the vicinity thereof. In blasting, all necessary precautions shall be taken to protect persons and property. No blasting shall be done within 50 feet of the pipe laid. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer after the rock removal is completed. No masonry, pipe of other material shall be placed in the excavated area until the Engineer has approved the depth of excavation and the character of the foundation material. The Contractor shall at all times keep the excavation free from water. The water shall be disposed of by the Contractor to the satisfaction of the Engineer and in accordance with the General Conditions and applicable laws and regulations. The Contractor shall provide all necessary pumps, dams, drains, ditches, flumes, will points and other means for excluding water and for preventing the above earthen slopes from sliding or caving. He shall satisfactorily remove all water which interferes with the work. The Contractor shall sufficiently dewater all trenches. The flow off all sewers, drains, utility lines and water coursed met with shall be maintained and provided for by the Contractor without damage or nuisance to other parties. All connections shall be restored. Before any masonry is placed or any pipe is laid, suitable drains shall be provided as needed and maintained in order that the trench bottom shall be free from water and sufficiently dry at all times. No pipe shall be Iain in water. Water shall not be permitted to rise to the level of the bottom of the pipe until such time as it has been inspected as to acceptability, bedded and the trench properly backfilled. No masonry of any kind laid in cement mortar shall be place in water. No water shall be allowed to flow over or rise upon fresh cement, and no water shall be allowed to enter the pipe until such time and under such conditions as the Engineer shall approve. The Contractor shall provide and operate additional pumps or drains at any place where the Engineer shall deem them to be necessary. 59 Except as otherwise provided, no direct payment shall be made for the work of dewatering as specified above or herein, but compensation for such work and all expenses incidental thereto shall be considered as having been included in the prices. The site of the work will be cleaned of all rubbish and surplus or unsuitable materials and promptly restored to its original condition as backfilling proceeds and work progresses. Pavements adjacent to the site of the work shall be constantly swept so as to prevent scarring of the pavement by scattered stones. No separate payment shall be made for clean up. VII -4 METHOD OF MEASUREMENT This work will be measured for payment by the actual number of cubic yards of rock removed within the payment lines as indicated on the Contract Drawings, or as directed by the Engineer. VII -5 BASIS OF PAYMENT This work will be paid for at the Contract unit price per cubic yard for 'Rock Excavation" not to exceed two (2') feet plus the inside diameter of the pipe including six (6") inches below the bottom of the pipe and one (V) foot clear around manholes, as shown on the Contract Drawings, which price shall include the removal and disposal of all excavated rock, and all materials, equipment, tools, labor and work necessary for or incidental to the completion of the Item. No rock shall be considered for payment if the Contractor fails to notify the Engineer of its presence and allows ample time for the Engineer to cross section the rock. 60 SECTION VIII SAMPLE TEST FORMS SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, & MANHOLES Vlll — DESCRIPTION The following formulas will be utilized to test the sanitary sewer, the sanitary sewer, manholes & grease trap for the Adams Fairacre Farms Project — SMH No. 1, SMH No, 2, SMH No. 5, SMH No. 6, SMH No. 7 & SMH No. 8 Sanitary Sewer: a) Infiltration —100 gallons per inch diameter, per mile of pipe, per day. b) Exfiltration — a minimum of 4' of head above crown of pipe, Allowable leakage same as infiltration. c) Air Test— In accordance with ASTM F1417, C-828-86 & UNI -B-6 Sanitary Manholes: a) Exfiltration — a minimum of 4' of head above crown of pipe, allowable leakage same as infiltration. b) Vacuum — In accordance with ASTM C1244-05 The testing may be done upon assembly of the manhole. •:+ The,manhole-to-pipe connection shall be a flexible connector, such as the Kor-N-Seal or approved equal. A 60 inch/lb. Torque wrench shall be used to tighten the external clamps of the Kor-N-Seal connector. ❖ All lift holes shall be plugged with non -shrinking mortar, as approved by Engineer. 4• The seal between the manhole sections shall be in accordance with ASTM C923. •:+ The contractor shall plug the pipe openings, take care to securely brace the plugs and the pipes. •:+ With the vacuum tester set in place: 1) Inflate the compression band to effect a seal between the vacuum base and the structure. 2) Connect the vacuum pump to the outlet port with the valve open. 3) Draw a vacuum to 10" of Hg. and close the valve. 4) The test shall pass if the vacuum remains at 10" Hg. or drops to 9" Hg. in a time greater than show on table 1. Water Main: Pressure Test — In accordance with AWWA C600-05, test pressure —150 psi 61 Q W a J c� J a U W m J J a Z a_ O Q W 0' V) (f] W Of CL X Q C.� V) a_ O n 0 W Ir 0 of C3 Q W = R V 4J (j :2 Z H O O _Z O 0� J Ow U z_ Z (!) hr- LL.O 00nO rn N 0 QD LO r� N COt-,I-Lr) �0�0�0�0oi O r7oi� d ONu7t` � r% i ori ao r � a� ter- co r� .--- - r- o co O NNN�c9Olt� O O �t(D�prt -r-000Nm Lo tr) f- o00NL] Z N O ro__O�LOOOi, O L Coort NNrjcDN0)a N n� LO r 00 f Z �0M ND to0ff)-t N LLI O N r7cnf� 07�rNLr) w 4 E, U-)00 Ln C-) (DOS (DOOt�O� �Nn 0 W p U-) t�PO N'L p4 V) t�7 u0 1� 6� .-- r r N t-) -4 to w !- Z LL- i� U-) w0 � c00000� O (0 00 U") 'o O O 00rt NOOu-)t) ti Lot` m f NNt,-) 4t!] D0 J^ O U JJJJO �t (D CON00 JJoONNI-I-OCD�cO or- LTJ dd f�r-'t d W Qv � zo 00 In(Nt���CD00[- IcolP r)o jr6u71�0i"71�NN� o LJ W r--00 00 rn rn rnrnr?Oi�I�ri��flDONCD z zLL �iSt�NN� - - m0000r-w ca w 0 0 0 O N-O0QrtnN�0 r��t�N�I�oicVtnoOr Mi �. nL6Noir' n L �• � a� dNt1�o0•-�I�or�cQ � CD 00 r.-,-�NNN►�r�Pr1 MANHOLE VACUUM TEST ASTM C1244-05 i TABLE 1 Minimum Test Times for Various Manhole diameters in Seconds Depth 48 in 54 in 60 in 66 in 72 in (ft.) Dia. Dia. Dia. Dia. Dia. 8 20 23 26 29 33 10 25 29 33 36 41 12 30 35 39 43 49 14 35 41 46 51 57 16 40 46 52 58 67 18 45 52 59 65 73 20 50 58 65 72 81 22 55 64 72 79 89 24 59 69 78 87 97 26 64 75 85 94 105 28 69 81 91 101 113 30 74 87 96 108 121 63 LEAKAGE TEST FOR SANITARY SEWER TEST FORM PROJECT: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS ENGINEER: MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.S., L.L.C. 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 CONTRACTOR: DATE: TEST LOCATION: TEMPERATURE: WEATHER: DIAMETER OF PIPE: 8" LENGTH OF PIPE: DIA. OF MANHOLE: 48" NO. OF MANHOLE IN TEST: NONE TYPE OF TEST: A. EXFILTRATION TEST HEAD: B. INFILTRATION DURATION: C. AIR TEST AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE OBSERVED: PSI THEORETICAL ALLOWED LEAKAGE: 1.0 PSI FIRST TEST: PASSED SECOND TEST: PASSED FAILED FAILED DATE DATE BY BY THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEAKAGE TEST WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND 1 OR OBERSERVATION OF THE UNDERSIGNED. ENGINEER SIGNED: DATE: 64 CONTRACTOR SIGNED: DATE: LEAKAGE TEST FOR SANITARY MANHOLE TEST FORM PROJECT: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS ENGINEER: MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.S., L.L.C. 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 CONTRACTOR: DATE: TEMPERATURE: WEATHER: TEST LOCATION: DIAMETER OF PIPE: 8" LENGTH OF PIPE: DIA. OF MANHOLE: 48" NO. OF MANHOLE IN TEST• ONE TYPE OF TEST: A. EXFILTRATION TEST HEAD: B. VACUUM DURATION: AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE OBSERVED: GPD THEORETICAL ALLOWED LEAKAGE: GPD FIRST TEST: PASSED SECOND TEST: PASSED FAILED FAILED DATE DATE BY BY THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEAKAGE TEST WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND 1 OR OBSERVATION OF THE UNDERSIGNED. ENGINEER SIGNED: DATE: CONTRACTOR SIGNED: DATE: 65 LEAKAGE TEST FOR GREASE TRAP TEST FORM PROJECT: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS ENGINEER: MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.S., L.L.C. 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 CONTRACTOR: DATE: TEST LOCATION: TEMPERATURE: DIAMETER OF PIPE: 6" LENGTH O SIZE OF GREASE TRAP: 6'W x 12' L N TYPE OF TEST: A. EXFILTRATION B. VACUUM AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE OBSERVED: THEORETICAL ALLOWED LEAKAGE: FIRST TEST: PASSED FAILED DATE BY WEATHER: F PIPE: NIA O. IN TEST: ONE XX TEST HEAD: DURATION: 24 Hours Min, GPD GPD SECOND TEST: PASSED FAILED DATE_ BY THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEAKAGE TEST WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND / OR OBSERVATION OF THE UNDERSIGNED, ENGINEER SIGNED: DATE: CONTRACTOR SIGNED: DATE: LEAKAGE TEST FOR WATER MAIN TEST FORM PROJECT: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS ENGINEER: MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.S., L.L.C. 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 CONTRACTOR: DATE: TEMPERATURE: WEATHER: TEST LOCATION: SDS P L= ---------- DIAMETER OF PIPE: 8" 148,000 LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED: AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE: TEST: A. TEST HEAD: 150 PSI B. DURATION: 2 HOURS AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE OBSERVED: THEORETICAL ALLOWED LEAKAGE FIRST TEST: PASSED SECOND TEST: PASSED FAILED FAILED DATE DATE BY BY THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEAKAGE TEST WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND / OR OBSERVATION OF THE UNDERSIGNED. ENGINEER CONTRACTOR SIGNED: SIGNED: DATE: DATE: 67 SECTION Vlll — US ROUTE 9 SAMPLE TEST FORMS SANITARY SEWER & MANHOLES Vlll —DESCRIPTION The following formulas will be utilized to test the sanitary sewer &sanitary sewer manholes for the Adams Fairacre Farms Project — SMH No. 3 & SMH NoA. Sanitary Sewer: a) Pressure Test — In accordance with AWWA C600-05, test pressure — 150 psi Sanitary Manholes: a) Vacuum — In accordance with ASTM C1244-05, modified as noted. •:• The testing may be done upon assembly of the manhole, The manhole -to -pipe connection shall be a flexible connector, such as the Kor-N-Seal or approved equal. A 60 inch/lb. Torque wrench shall be used to tighten the external clamps of the Kor-N-Seal connector. +:+ All lift holes shall be plugged with non -shrinking mortar, as approved by Engineer. The seal between the manhole sections shall be in accordance with ASTM C923. The contractor shall plug the pipe openings, take care to securely brace the plugs and the pipes. +:• With the vacuum tester set in place: 1) Inflate the compression band to effect a seal between the vacuum base and the structure. 2) Connect the vacuum pump to the outlet port with the valve open. 3) Draw a vacuum to 10" of Hg. and close the valve. 4) The test shall pass if the vacuum remains at 10" Hg, or drops to 9.5" Hg. in a time greater than show on table 1. MANHOLE VACUUM TEST ASTM C1244-05 i TABLE 1 Minimum Test Times for Various Manhole diameters In Seconds Depth 48 in 54 in 60 in 66 in 72 in (ft.) Dia. Dia. Dia, Dia. Dia. 8 2.0 23 26 29 33 10 25 29 33 36 41 12 30 35 39 43 49 14 35 41 46 51 57 16 40 46 52 58 67 18 45 52 59 65 73 20 50 58 65 72 81 22 55 64 72 79 89 24 59 69 78 87 97 26 64 75 85 94 105 28 69 81 91 101 113 30 74 87 96 108 121 0 LEAKAGE TEST FOR SANITARY SEWER TEST FORM PROJECT: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS ENGINEER: MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.S., L.L.C. 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 CONTRACTOR: DATE: TEMPERATURE: TEST LOCATION: SD4 P L---------- 148,000 WEATHER: DIAMETER OF PIPE: 8" LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED: AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE: TEST: A. TEST HEAD: 150 PSI B. DURATION: 2 HOURS AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE OBSERVED: THEORETICAL ALLOWED LEAKAGE FIRST TEST: PASSED SECOND TEST: PASSED FAILED FAILED DATE DATE BY BY THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEAKAGE TEST WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND 1 OR OBERSERVATION OF THE UNDERSIGNED. ENGINEER CONTRACTOR SIGNED: SIGNED: DATE: DATE: 70 LEAKAGE TEST FOR SANITARY MANHOLE TEST FORM PROJECT: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS ENGINEER: MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.S., L.L.C. 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 CONTRACTOR: DATE: TEST LOCATION: DIAMETER OF PIPE: DIA. OF MANHOLE: TYPE OF TEST: A. Hg TEMPERATURE: WEATHER: 8" LENGTH OF PIPE: 48" NO. OF MANHOLE IN TEST: ONE EXFILTRATION TEST HEAD: B. VACUUM XX DURATION: AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE OBSERVED: GPD THEORETICAL ALLOWED LEAKAGE: 0.5" Hg FIRST TEST: PASSED SECOND TEST: PASSED FAILED FAILED DATE DATE BY BY 10" THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEAKAGE TEST WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION AND 1 OR OBSERVATION OF THE UNDERSIGNED. ENGINEER SIGNED: DATE: 71 CONTRACTOR SIGNED: DATE: EXHIBIT "B" HD-1, APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR A WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS DUTCHESS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR A WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM Name & address of applicant: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - DON ADAMS I PATRICK ADAMS 765 DUTCHESS TURNPIKE POUGHKEEPSIE NEW YORK 12603 2. Name of Project: ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 3. Location: T1X/X WAPPINGER 4. Project Engineer MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.C, 5. Address 9 ELKS LANE POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12601 6. Type of Project Private/Residential _ Camp XX Commercial_ Apartments _ Institutional _ Mobile Home Park _ Office Building _ Food Service Other (specify) Realty Subdivision 7. Is this project subject to State Environmental Quality Review (SEAR)? Type status (check one) _Type I —Type II _ Exempt XX Unlisted 8. Is a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) required? NO --- LONG EAF - ENCLOSED 9. Has a DEIS been completed and found acceptable by the Lead Agency? W- SUPPLEMENTS 10. Name of Lead Agency: WAPPINGER PLANNING BOARD 11. Is this project in an area under the control of local Planning, Zoning or other officials, ordinances? YES 12. If so, have plans been submitted to such authorities? YES 13. Has preliminary approval been granted by such authorities? SITE PLAN APPROVAL - DOES NOT RECEIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 14.Type of sewage disposal system discharge: NIA Surface waters NIA Ground waters 15, If surface water discharge, what is the stream class designation? N/A 16. Waters index number (surface) N/A 17. Is project located near a public water supply system? YES 18. If yes, name of water supply: SEE NOTE No. 1 Dist. to water supply: SEE NOTE No. 1 19. Is project site near a public sewage collection or disposal system? YES 20, Name of sewage system: SEE NOTE No, 2 Dist_ to sewage system: SEE NOTE No. 2 21, Were subsurface soil tests observed by a Health Department representative? NIA 22, 24. 25. 26. Date observed: NIA 23. Name of Health Inspector: Project design flow (gallons per day) SEE NOTE No. 3 NIA Is an application for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) required? NO Has application been submitted to local NYSDEC office? NIA 27. Is any portion of this project located within a designated wetland? YES 28. Is a Wetland Permit required? NO 29. Has application been made to local DEC office? NIA i 30. Does project require a Stream Disturbance Permit? NO 31 32 Is project located within 1000 feet of existence of abandoned landfill, hazardous waste site, salt stockpile or any other potential known source of contamination? NO Describe: Does this project involve discharge or storage of industrial or hazardous wastes? NO Describe: 33. Is there a local master plan on file with the Town, Village, City? YES 34. Are community water, sewer facilities planned to be developed within 15 years? YES 35. Are any sewage disposal areas in excess of 10% slope? NIA 36. Tax Map I.D. Number: 6157-04-649335 37,Approved plans are to be returned to: _ Applicant XX Engineer If the application is signed by a person other than the applicant shown in Item 1, the application must be accompanied by a letter of authorization. Failure to comply with this provision may be grounds for the rejection of any submission. I hereby affirm, under penalty of perjury, that information provided on this form is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A Misdemeanor pur- suant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Signatures and official titles: LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ATTACHED Mailing address HD-1.doc 10-96 Note No. 1 — Note No. 2 — Note No. 3 — - ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS - a) Name of Water Supply — "United Wappinger Water District" b) Dist. To Water Supply — Approximately 590' a) Name of Sewage System — Town of Wappinger & Tri -Municipal b) Distance to Sewage system —Approximately 620' a) Project Design Flow 1. Water -Using NYSDEC expected hydraulic loading rates the proposed 74,742 square foot building would have a daily use of 7,474 GPD. However, this does not reflect the tropical room & nursery's. The anticipated daily water consumption will range from 20,000 GPD to 25,000 GPD. 2. Sewage —Also using NYSDEC expected hydraulic rates the proposed 74,742 square foot building will have a daily use of 7,474 GPD. A flow meter shall be install in proposed sanitary sewer manhole No. 6 {see Exhibit "D"). N54549181,1 ADOC F4MAM FMW PWE B-210K� imonis AoiwAatm !; FAA lAfta Foughkod"o,k NY 12601 wuw thm lw" &S ovwdnft IbA " = Ftohoiolw Ergmw, you M authoTizod to execute the &xwmob mqWte4 by dw Dvftbm Covaty DoMftem of Haim with nard to The appkcWi= and opMvuh for dz ww Man F*iR,=;Fwm WAfim co Ram 9 in' vptagFaux to w w d o m sf a r m s . r o m 765 Duteliess Turnpike 1560 LnILerAycn.e 12+0 Rowc 3oa P..gbknopi,,. ?inw'Vnr'k rqSO3 LAe Katrino. New Yo& m449 Namburgh. N—Vark iot55o t; 45*5+-*330 is 45-336-630,0 ct 94q -OV -0303 r! 94-5-4-51-1337 45-33fi-41+6 f: 845-569-0264. EXHIBIT "C" GEN -296, APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENTS ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENT L Applimnt, 2, Location kit" WO.A.5 1AX I ADA,Nlb: FA]RACRE %1APPINGER DUTC'1ff;.:11SS UIN 1.: [111) WAPPIN61 �R. FARMS WA]TIR DISTIUCT 5, '1 yrk- A-0 Nlunicipa1 El colurtterciat Ul'❑ 63 Private -..Other 1 Author C .10 intorshft. 01 9 Willer Wbrk% Cam,f - 111"outin.,Ial I � F 9 1.--' .J.P 4Meml U 40T.ft tentmital Ll 26 Wh" or IF!ducation20 Slate J I$ Indion Rtsic-n,atkm LJ 45. 1 projoc r re. laird to -a ciifftc urrcrit El Yin 7. Drainage Basin: 8, Mai,ire ire of Project: 1.0. fls Pkimt KWAted 4-a a 0-0 New Yes Age".1141 CotaprehehsNe Watt-Slludylil F-1 Modifications t --o No ❑ Yes t -o' No 11. Type of Project: ✓ Distribution F-1 Source[I Pumping Unit E] Fluoridation r] Storage D Transmission E] Chlorination ❑ Other Treatment F1 Other REMARKS: 12, Estimated Cost of Project,. Source $ ------- Treatment ------- Distribution $ 150,000.00 13. Population: Total Population Population % Population Served of Service Area: 73,942 Sq. Ft Building Actually Served: 100% Affected By Project: 100% 14, Latest Total Consumption Data (in MGD) 15. Approved Plans are to be Returned to: Avg. Day 0,0250 Year Max. Day 0.1000 Year 1-0 Engineer Peak Hr. 0.0208 Year E] Applicant 16, Name of Design Engineer: Peter D. Setaro, P.E. N.Y. State License No. 077008 Address: 9 Elks Lane Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 12601 Telephone No. (914) 454-3411 17. Name and Title of Applicant or Designated Representative SEE ATTACHED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Date Signature of Applicant NOTE: All applications must be accompanied by plans, specifications and an Engineer's Report describing the project in detail. The project must first be discussed with the appropriate City, County, District or Regional Public Health Engineer, Signature by a designated representative must be accompanied by a letter of authorization. Form Gen 296 '09,11AV216013, 11.64 f3dMeAlfial ADac FAt#Am F,Akse PAAE 821U.1 septomber 10, 2W8 Njoxfis Asmdatin 9 Oh lAfto Pou"ce"e, NY 12601 rl=w g=pt " tota 4* tvAarft *at as =... Profegi=9 PAfflnrtr, YM. = MAhaftzw to exwtft We docmiwft mqA*ed by ft DW2uw:Couaty DqmtrWv*f of HSM vath aWd to thoappficafim aW appwvtb for -tboww Adms Fisirmi lig, IF. R401M 9 in W2ppjq$M FaR_1 Slia1z"Y" -toww. odamsfarms, cum 765 rhTtchcos Turnpike 1560 UIXWA.ark.a n+o Roittc Boo PougUrmpsiv., Krw'Yorlc T -A603 Ukr. KRtrive, New York v2j49 Newburgb, Nftw Yopirk 12550 is 8*6-0r -,*330 U 134,5-336-6300 ti r! 45-4-51-+337 1- 41-336-4101 f: 845-569-0264. EXHIBIT "D " GREASE TRAP SIZING CALCULATIONS FOR ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS Utilizing NYSDEC "Design Standards For Wastewater Treatment Works 1988", the following equation will be used for sizing the necessary grease trap for the food service center. Note, the minimum size grease trap will be 750 gallons. Restaurants: {D} x {GL) x {ST) x {HR/2) x (LF) = size of grease trap, gallons where: D - Number of seats in dining area. GL — Gallons of wastewater per meal, normally 5 gallons. ST = Storage capacity factor {minimum = 1, 7, onsite disposal = 2.5 HR = Number of hours open. LF = Loading factor {interstate freeways — 1.25, other freeways and recreational areas = 1.0, main highways = 0.8, other highways = 0.5 Adams Fairacre Farms Food Service Facility: A) 24 seats B) Hours open — 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. 24 Seats x 5 Gallons x 2.1 Storage Capacity Factor x 12/2 Hours of Operation x 0.8 Loading Factor � 1,209.6 Gallons. Additional, Adams Fairacre Farms will have within the store a deli, a bakery and a butcher (with meat cutting capabilities). The formula that will be utilized for these is as follows: (hours of operation) x 4.0 x 10. For each of the following conditions, a factor of 0.50 is to be added to the categorical use factor {C.U.F.) value of 4.0 when dealing with meat cutting: ➢ More than one { 1) floor drain Complete cooking of meats Also, when dealing with retail -type bakeries or supermarkets that have bakery facilities in addition to a deli and/or meat cutting, the bakery shall be sized separately using the same formula as above with the deduction of the 0.50 adjustment for cooking of meats. will be: a) Deli & butcher =-:> 12 {hrs) x 5.0 x 10.0 = 600 Gallons b) Bakery => 12 {hrs) x 4.5 x 10.0 = 480 Gallons Therefore, the grease trap to be used for Adams Fairacre Farms 1) Restaurant => 1,209.6 Gallons 2) Deli & butcher => 600.0 Gallons 3) Bakery =, 480.0 Gallons 2,289.6 => use 2,500 Gallon Grease Trap Concrete septic tan�:s should be coated with a bituminous coating ( to ensure watertightness and prevent deterioration. Concrete tanks are not reccmTended for treatment of wastewater that is high in sulfa or sulfate. The septic tank should be placed on a level layer of sand or pea gravel to provide an adecuate bedding. At least one manhole of 20 inches in the shortest dimension is required in each canpartment of a tank with a liquid depth of 48 inches or greater. For tanks with a liquid depth shallower than 48 inches, openings of minim= size 12 inches in the least dimension may be substituted. Nsanholes should be placed over the inlet and the outlet of the tank and should extend to the ground surface so that the tank may be inspected and sludge and sc= removed conveniently. Septic tank access covers that are at grade should be provided with locking devices. Kitchen facilities with large volumes of wastewater shall be served by a separate sewer line in which a grease trap is installed upstream flan the treatment system. Ground garbage shall not be permitted in a line served by a grease trap. Trap location mast be selected to insure maintanance, and to allow score cooling to facilitate separation while not allowing the grease to solidify before ruching the tap. Usual locations are outside the building near the wastewater source. Fumn out should occur when 75 percent of the tank capacity has been used, with frequencies for restaurants ranging frexn weekly to once every three months. The following two equations size grease .ran necessary for c= rercial kitchens- The gallons. 1. Restaurants: should be used for estiz;ating the restaurants and. other' types of minimum size grease trap should be 750 (D)(GL)(ST)(HR/2)(LF) = size of grease trap, gallons where, D GL, ST f -R Lr = Number of seats in dining area = Ga'_lons of wastewater per meal, normally 5 gallons Srorace capacity factor (minimun = 1.7, onsite disposal = 2.5) = NtTber of hours open " Loading factor (interstate freeways = 1.25, other rreeway5 and recreational areas = 1.0, main highways 0.8, other highways = 0.5). 2. Hospitals, Nursing Hares, etc.: (M) (GL) (ST) (2.5) (LF) = size of grease trap, gallons where, - M = Meals per day GL = Gallons of wastewater per meal, normally 4.5 gallons ST = Storage capacity factor (miriM= = 1.7, onsite dis-cosal - 2.5) -3; - CATEGORY C DELI STORES, SUPERMARKETS BUTCHERS and BAKERIES (with meat cutting capabilities) FORMULA (hours of operation) x 4.0 x 10 For each of the following conditions, a factor of .50 is to be added to the C.U.F. value of 4.0 when dealing with meat cutting: • more than one floor drain • complete cooking of meats When dealing with retail -type bakeries or supermarkets that have bakery facilities in additon to a deli and/or meat cutting, the bakery shall be sized separately using the same formula as above with the detection of the .50 adjustment for the cooking of meats. There is an adjustment of an addition of 1.5 to the C.F.U. when dealing with bakeries that are wholesale only, or are of the industrial classification. CATEGORY D FOOD COURTS and "COMMON" TRAPS Each case shall be sized by separating each of the potential contributors into it's own category then combining the operations for a total trap size. Example: Mile High Food Court Tenants List: McDonalds, Taco Bell, Wong Le's Mongolian, Mrs. Fields Cookies, Little Caesar's Pizza. McDonalds, Taco Bell and Wong Le's would be sized using the formula applicable for Category A-2. Little Caesar's could be sized by using Category A-1. Mrs. Field's would use the formula for Category C. CATEGORY E COMNIISARIES, COMMERCIAL KITCHENS and CATERERS These must be sized on an individual basis. However, it should be noted that the minimum acceptable size for a commercial kitchen shall be 1500 gallons. CATEGORY F FOOD MANUFACTURERS Each case shall be evaluated separately. Whenever a manufacturing operation is evaluated, it must be noted that a Control Manhole will be required in most cases in additon to a minimum of 1500 gallon { Grease Interceptor. �\� 1\ THE FORT MILER GD., IN � ;\� /1 l PO 60X 96 PHONE:(518)LE,NY12871 1500 to 3000 GALLON PHONE: {5181595-5000 FAX: (518) 695-4970 www.fortmiller.com HEAVY DUTY GREASE TRAP FORT MILLER CONCRETE: 4000 PSI REINFORCEMENT: ASTM A615 - GRADE 60 ASTM A185 - GRADE 60 ENTRAINED AIR: 5.0%-9.0% - MEETS ASTM C890 - q _�:� PIPE 'I' OR'O' 6" 18" -1, TYPICAL 24"0 OPENING (TYPICAL) ��✓�" SLIDE -IN BAFFLE TYPICAL i I � 2" I � I y\ 6'-0" 1500 & 2000 GAL. (TYPICAL) 7'-0" KNOCK -OUT 2500 & 3000 GAL. NOTES: INLET AND OUTLET TEES SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. • INLET AND OUTLET KNOCKOUTS PROVIDED FOR VO PIPE. • BAFFLE IS SEPARATE SLIDE -IN TYPE, • FUEL AND OIL RESISTANT GREY BUTYL IS REQUIRED (CS -440 OR EQUAL). DESIGN CASE 3 (TRAFFIC) "i ` 11'-0" 1500 & 2000 C 8" SEE CHART 13'-0" 2500 & 3000 GAL. 6102 B-31 ACAD DWG: B31 LIQUID INLET OUTLET INTEGRAL INTEGRAL OVERALL HEIGHT INTEGRAL INTEGRAL BAFFLE SIZE LEVEL HEIGHT HEIGHT TOP BASE TOP BASE (LBS) GALLONSHEIGHT L' I' O HEIGHT INSIDE OUTSIDE (LBS) (LBS) INSIDE INSIDE 1500 4'-6" 5'-6" 5'-3" 2'-0" T-6" 5'-6" 6'-8" 11,400 13,400 3600 2000 8'-0" 7'-0" 6'-9" 3'-6" T-6" T-0" 8'-2" 15,000 13,400 4600 2500 5'-2" 6-2" 5'-11" 2'-10" 3'-4" 1 6'-2" T-4"17,200 16,400 3200 3000 6'-2" T-2" 6'-11" T-10" 3'-4" 1 7'-2" 1 6'4" 1 20,000 1 16,400 1 5800 6102 B-31 ACAD DWG: B31 EXHIBIT "E" DATA GATOR FLOW METER FOR ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS DATA GATOR FLOW METER Due to the large variation between daily water consumption {20,000 to 25,000 gpd) and sewage use (7,000 to 8,000 gpd), a sanitary flow meter shall be permanently installed in proposed manhole No. 6, {SMH No. 6.) Data Gator Flow Meter As shown on the attached sheets, the Contractor shall supply and install a Data Gator Flow Meter or approved equal. Renaissance Instruments 2555 North IH -35, Suite 300 Round Rock, Texas 78664 Telephone Number (512) 388-9270 Fax: (512) 388-9272 Now you don't have to compromise accuracy or sacrifice time to measure flow under varying conditions. Engineered specifically for sewer flow monitoring, Renaissance instruments' patented DataGator(E provides NIST traceable accuracy without the need for on-site calibration or flow profiling. Fully programmable, pre -calibrated and easily installed, the DataGator simplifies long or short-term flow monitoring from data collection to final analysis and reporting - regardless of the flow condition. r RENAISSANCE f INSTRUMENTS Home • How it Works • Applications and Benefits • DataGatorg"Specifications • CalcuFlow"M 97 Software - Contact Us ® 1998 Renaissance Instruments Flow Metering System R.LNAISSANNCT: 11 INSTRUMENTS Innovative, Award -Winning Technology The DataGator combines a modified Venturi flow tube design with strategically positioned pressure transducers to accurately and reliably measure flow under all conditions - including transitional periods between open channel and full pipe. The flow measurement is derived ftom proven hydraulic theories using three distinct pressure readings within the pre -calibrated flow tube. By translating pressure directly into flow, the DataGator eliminates errors introduced by level and velocity conversions and average velocity calculations. The DataGatoes flow tube, available in sizes to fit 8", 10", 12" or 15" sewer pipe, is securely sealed to the pipe wall using an inflatable ring assembly. Housed in a submersible NEMAbP enclosure, the DataGator electronics are designed to withstand the harsh sewer environment. Home • View the DataGator® • Applications and Benefits DataGatorO Specifications • CalcuFlowTM 97 Software • Contact Us ® 1998 Renaissance instruments riow metering ti M RENAISSANCE INSTRUMENTS Simplify the Entire Flow Monitoring Process Applicationsir Benefits Inflow and Infiltration Studies (I&I) Accuracy traceable to NIST standards Sewer System Evaluation Surveys (SSSS) Factory pre -calibrated Industrial Monitoring Fully portable and easily installed Inter -District Billing No minimum level or flow requirement Lift Station Metering Sampler pacing & rainfall logging Real time data monitoring Independent of velocity profiles Eliminates Doppler and Magnetic sensors -C cuFlowTM 97 software (for Windows® 95) The DataGator's specially designed flow tube includes three submersible, high accuracy pressure transducers for flow measurement without sensor fouling or minimum level concerns. Sewer flow monitoring under all flow conditions - open channel, full pipe, surcharged, submerged, and reverse. Home • View the_DataGator(R) • How it Works - DataGator® Specifications - Ca1cuFlowTM 97 Software Contact Flow Meter System Specifications V Measurement Ran e Performance Accuracy ,. Operatin��Temperature Ranke Power Requirements Electronics sc Flow Tube •�� Operation Calibration Flow Conditions Home • View the DataGatorO - How it Works Applications and Benefits CalcuFlowTM 97 Software Contact Us Measurement Range: .Pipe Size Cinch) 8 10 12 15 Back to the Top Performance Accuracy: Maximum Flow (GPM) 760 1400 2260 4130 Flow Conditions Accuracy: Percent of Maximum Flow Open Channel Forward Flow +/- 3% Reverse Flow +/- 3 % Full Pipe Forward Flow +/- 3% * See Note Reverse Flow +/- 3 % Full Pipe Below Transition +/- 10% * See Note Open Channel (>90% submergence) Forward Flow +/- 5% Reverse Flow +/- 5% *Note: Up to 10' surcharge Back to the Top Operating Temperature Range: Sensors 32° to 120"F (00 to 50°C) Electronics - 5° to 120°F (- 17° to 50°C) Back to the Top Power Requirements: Standard: Battery powered 8 each D -Cell alkaline; 1 each 9 volt alkaline (memory backup) (Minimum battery life of 90 days at 15 minute data logging intervals) Optional: 115/ 230VAC 1 15%, 50/ 60Hz, 12VA, w/ 8 each D -Cell NiCd (primary backup) and 1 each 9 volt alkaline (memory backup) Back to the_Top Electronics: Enclosure Material: Lightweight structural foam resin Rating: NEMA 6P submersible (6.Oft for 24 hours) Dimensions: 12-5/8" x 13-3/4" x 5-7/8" deep Weight: 15 lbs. (6.8 kg) including standard batteries, sensors, and 25 ft. cable Desiccant protected Sensors Type: Stainless steel submersible pressure transducers Cable: 25 ft. (7.6m) polyurethane outer jacket Housing: Sealed, watertight PVC (submersible) Over Range: 11 psi (25 ft. Water) Air Intake: Atmospheric pressure reference protected by hydrophobic filter Back to the Ton Flow Tube: (weights and dimensions shown below) Sizes: 8, 10, 12, and 15 inches (consult factory for additional flow tube sizes) Material: fiberglass reinforced isophthalic polyester resin. Inside surface of white gelcoat. Hardware: stainless steel, bubble level with aluminum e, sampler event, and rainfall Communications Data Retrieval: IBM compatible computer Transfer Protocol: RS -232 at 9600 baud Optional: Modem at 1200 baud (9600 baud available) Software: CalcuFlowTM 97 (for Windows(t 95) Back to the Top Calibration: NO FIELD CALIBRATION OR FLOW PROFILING REQUIRED FIow tube pre -calibrated at a NIST traceable flow laboaratory. Back to the To Flow Conditions: Open channel, Full Pipe, Surcharged, Submerged, and Reverse Back _to the Top RENAISSANCE L INSTRUMENTS Home • View the_DataGatoO it) - How it Works • Applications and -Benefits • CalcuFlowTM 97 Software Contact Us 0 1998 Renaissance Insttumenls Contact Us About the DataGator® Renaissance Instruments 2555 North IH -35, Suite 300 Round Rock, TX 78664 Phone: (512)388-9270 Fax: (512)388-9272 contact us Home • View the DataGatore • How it Works • Applications and Benefits • DataGato&� Syeci#icatiaiis C4IcuF1_o.wTM 97 Software RENAISSANCE , [A'STlttrMC\7"i$ ® 1998 Renaissance Instruments Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment .Report Adams Fairacre Farm Route 9 Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, NY November 26, 2007 Prepared by: Michael Nowicki Ltologi al Sc>lUtions, LLC 1248 Southford Road Southbury, CT 06488 (203)910-4716 Adams Fairacre Farm —Tonin ofWappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitabilily Assessment page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 3 Figure1.0-1 Location Map................................................................................................... 5 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW....................................................................................................... 6 3.0 HABITAT SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT....................................................................... 9 4.0 CONCLUSION ...............................................................................................................13 5.0 PHOTOGRAPHS............................................................................................................14 Adams Fairam Farm -- Town of Wappinger Jndiana Ba"og Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION A Habitat Suitability Assessment was completed on the Adams Fairacre Farm property located on US Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York (Figure 1.0-1) for two species including the New York State endangered species Bog Turtle, (9&tem�ls muhlenbergii) and Indiana Bat M Otis sodalis as part of the environmental review for the project. The subject property consists of 12.82 acres and is located on the east side of US Route 9 south of its junction with Old Hopewell Road. Field assessments were conducted during July 2007 to determine whether suitable habitat for these species is present on the 12.82 acres property. Habitat cover types were also observed and are described below. There are 3 distinct natural broad cover types identified on the site during the field investigation by, Ecological Solutions, LLC, as classified by Reschke Table 1.0-1. TABLE 1.0-1 COVER TYPES IDENTIFIED ON ADAMS FAIRACRE FARM PROPERTY Detailed descriptions of each natural cover type are outlined below. 1. Forested Wetland - There are 2.37 acres of hardwood swamp that occurs in poorly drained depressions and inorganic soils on the site. Red maple (Acer rubrum) is dominant and the co dominants consist of American elm (Ulmus Americana), swamp white oak, (Quercus bicolor) and pin oak (Quercus palustris). The shrub layer consists mainly of arrowood (Viburnum recognitum) spicebush (Lindera Benzoin), and Winterberry (Ilex verticillata). The herbaceous layer contains skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), tussock sedge (Carex stricta), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), and sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp). Total wetland acreage will increase to 2.58 acres as a result of the proposed wetland mitigation efforts on the site. T m� ��m e qWINION 1 Forested Wetland Red Maple Hardwood Swamp 2 Upland Hardwood Forest Rich Mesophytic Forest 3 Impervious Area Developed Area 4 Open Water I Open Water Detailed descriptions of each natural cover type are outlined below. 1. Forested Wetland - There are 2.37 acres of hardwood swamp that occurs in poorly drained depressions and inorganic soils on the site. Red maple (Acer rubrum) is dominant and the co dominants consist of American elm (Ulmus Americana), swamp white oak, (Quercus bicolor) and pin oak (Quercus palustris). The shrub layer consists mainly of arrowood (Viburnum recognitum) spicebush (Lindera Benzoin), and Winterberry (Ilex verticillata). The herbaceous layer contains skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), tussock sedge (Carex stricta), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), and sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp). Total wetland acreage will increase to 2.58 acres as a result of the proposed wetland mitigation efforts on the site. Adams Fairacre Farm - Town ofWappinger Indiana BaVBog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 4 2. Upland Hardwood Forest - There is currently 9.37 acres of upland forest community on the site. The dominant trees are red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Q. alba), black oak (Quercus velutina), black birch (Betula lenta), white ash (Fraxinus americana), sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and black cherry (Prunus serotiria) as well as shagbark hickory (Carya ovata). The shrub layer and ground layer here includes flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), hop -hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), hornbeam (Carpinus carolinensis), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Barberry (Berberis thunbergi), honeysuckle (Lonicera sp.), witch hazel (Hamamelis virginia), and spinulose wood -fern (Dryopteris spinulosa). Approximately 8.57 acres of this habitat type will be removed for the proposed project. 3. Impervious Area - The property contains 0.60 acres of developed area or impervious surface including single family residences and yard. area. This acreage is expected to increase to 8.96 acres as a result of the proposed development activities. 4. Open Water - Currently there is 0.25 acres of open water area on the site. No portion of this area will be impacted for this development. Adams Fairarre Farm - Town ofWappinger Indiana Baoog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 5 Figure 1.0-1 Location Map Adams Fairacre Farm — Town ofWappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page b 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW Indiana Bats - Indiana bat hibernacula and hibernacula characteristics havebeen well documented by numerous observational studies reported in the literature. In bats spend the winter months in secluded caves or mines. There are eight hibernacula currently known in Albany, Essex, Warren, Jefferson; Onondaga and Ulster Counties. To date there are three known hibernacula located in the immediate vicinity of Kingston, New York. The hibernacula are critical to the survival of this species because so few are known to exist. The USFWS and NYSDEC are continually documenting habitat utilization by this species once emergence occurs. With the coming of spring, Indiana bats disperse from their winter homes, known as . hibernacula, some going hundreds of miles. They feed solely on flying insects- and presumably males spend the summer preparing for the breeding season and winter that follows. Females congregate in nursery colonies, only a handful of which have ever been discovered. These were located along the banks of streams or lakes in forested habitat, under the loose bark of mature shagbark hickory trees, and some dead trees that have open or hanging bark to provide. shelter for the bats, and which can contain from 50-100 females. Each of the sites so far identified, have been in mature Shagbark Hickories that are located near existing wetland that contains some open water or streams or pond areas. With the coming of spring, Indiana bats disperse from their winter homes, known as hibernacula, some going hundreds of miles. They feed solely on flying insects and presumably males spend the summer preparing for the breeding season and winter that follows. Females congregate in nursery colonies, .only a handful of which have ever been discovered. A single young is born to each female, probably late in June, and is capable of flight within a month. Outside the hibernation period, Indiana bats are very mobile and use both live trees greater than 5. inches dbh especially containing dead wood and snags or dead trees in a variety of habitats for roosts during the summer months. Although roosts have been . documented in a wide array of hardwood and ,pine species, trees and snags that have exfoliating bark or crevices, such as Shagbark Hickory and Black Locust, appear to be most important to this species because females and their young rest under the bark. Trees, equal to or greater than 9 inches dbh with exfoliating bark/crevices, southern or western exposure, and solar exposure appear to be the most important habitat for maternal colonies during the summer months. In August or early September, Indiana bats swarm at the entrance of selected caves or mines. This is when mating takes place. Indiana bats spend the winter months in secluded caves or mines that average 37 to 43 degrees F. Criteria for selecting hibernacula are not clearly understood; many apparently suitable sites are not occupied. Where this species is found, however, it can be extremely abundant, congregating in Adams Fairacre Farre - Town ofWiippinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 7 densities of more than 300/square foot. Year after year, bats often return to exactly the same spots within individual caves or mines. Hibernation can begin as early as September and extend nearly to June. According to the literature roost -tree density necessary to support Indiana bats is not understood and negative or positive biological thresholds linked to roost abundance are unknown. Similarly, there are no quantitative studies that adequately describe species composition of forest stands or stand structure surrounding occupied roosts. There is evidence however that Indiana bats return to the same . summer foraging and roosting areas and sometime individual tree each year. Bog Turtle - According to a variety of sources, Bog Turtles' preferred habitat includes shallow, spring -fed fens, sphagnum bogs, swamps, marshy wet meadows with soft, muddy, organic bottoms, slow moving water, and open canopies bordered by shrub and red maple swamps. Plant species found in association with bog turtles include shrubby cinquefoil (Potentilla fruticosa), sedges (Carex spp., especially Carex stricta), sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp.), and skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus). The turtles frequently lay eggs atop tussock sedges in areas with open canopies and sparse shrub vegetation that would not shade the nests. According to NYSDEC and the Natural Heritage Program (2003)1, optimal habitat (in New York) has the following attributes: ■ <25% canopy cover; Headwater or spring head water sources; • Muddy substrate; ■ Shallow, uneroded rivulets; ■ Cinquefoil, sedges, rushes, sphagnum moss; ■ No obvious threats or evidence of negative impacts to wetland in the past. Habitat suitability declines as canopy cover increases and threats and impacts to the wetland increase in severity or proximity. Degraded water quality, due to siltation and eutrophication, is a primary threat to the turtles, as well as successional processes that lead to closed canopies, human influenced habitat changes, and collecting. ' Personal conversations between Jesse Jaycox (Natural Heritage Program) and Mike Clancy (NYSDEC), with Mike Nowicki 2003- 2005. Adams Fairacre Farm — Town ofWappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 8 The secretive bog turtles are the smallest species in the Genus Glyptemys, with the maximum length not exceeding 4.5 inches. The carapace is domed and from light brown to ebony, with scutes often having lighter -colored centers in a starburst pattern. The distinguishing feature is a large, conspicuous, bright orange, yellow, or red blotch on each side of the head. This blotch is present from birth in both sexes. Adams Fairacre Farm — Town of Wappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 9 # 3.0 HABITAT SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT Indiana Bats - The 12.82 acres property is generally undeveloped although some infrastructure (structures, driveways) has existed for decades. The property contains several habitat types that can broadly be categorized as upland hardwood forest (oak/maple/hickory forest) and forested wetland/open water/tributary (see Section 5.0 Photographs). The property has gentle to steep slopes especially in the forest areas. The southern wetland/ tributary area on the property is Federal wetland regulated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The tree canopy layer is consistent due to its trees of the same age class. Several trees of a variety of species are over 9" dbh and contain loose exfoliating bark/ crevices, cavities or holes, and dead Iimbs that may be potential Indiana Bat roosting/ maternal colony trees. No hibernacula are noted on the property. Please refer to Section 1.0. for more details. Bog Turtle Habitat (Phase 1) Survey Report Project and Site Information - The Bog Turtle habitat suitability assessment followed the protocols outlined by the Fish and Wildlife Service (2001)2 last revised on April 13, 2006. This Phase 1 was conducted on behalf of the property owner: Don Adams c/o Adams Fairacre Farm 765 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 (845) - 454-4330 The project/property name is: Adams Fairacre Farm Retail Grocery Store The project/property location is: US Route 9, Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, NY 12590. The property location is shown in Figure 1.0-1 USGS Wappingers Falls Quadrangle. The southern wetland on the site drains to the Wappinger Creek and then to the Hudson River. 2 LIS Fish and Wildlife Service 2001 Bog Turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) Northern Population, Recovery Plan. Hadley, Massachusetts Adams Fairacre Farm - Town ofWappinger Indiana B000g Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 10 Project Area/Property .The 12.82 acres property is generally undeveloped although some infrastructure (structures, driveways) has existed for decades. The property contains several habitat types that can broadly be categorized as upland hardwood forest (oak/maple/hickory forest) and forested wetland/open 'water/ tributary (see Section 5.0 Photographs). The property has gentle to steep slopes especially in the forest areas. The southern wetland/ tributary area on the property is Federal wetland regulated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The property contains 0.40 acres of developed area or impervious surface including single family residences and yard area. This acreage is expected to increase to 7.30 acres as a result of the proposed development activities. Current Land Use and Setting As previously stated there are 3 distinct natural broad cover types identified on the site during the field investigation by, Ecological Solutions, LLC; as. classified by Reschke Table 1.0-1. TABLE 1.0-1 COVER TYPES IDENTIFIED ON ADAMS FAIRACRE FARM PROPERTY Detailed descriptions of each natural cover type are outlined below. 1. Forested Wetland - There are 2.37 acres of hardwood swamp that occurs in poorly drained depressions and inorganic soils on the. site. Red maple (Acer rubrum) is da"nant and the co dominants consist of American elm (Ulmus Americana), swamp white oak, (Quercus bicolor) and pin oak (Quercus palustris), The shrub layer consists mainly of . arrowood (Viburnum recognitum) spicebush (Lindera Benzoin), and Winterberry (Ilex verticillata). The herbaceous layer contains skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), tussock sedge (Carex stricta), sensitive fern (Onoclea w 1 Forested Wetland Red Maple Hardwood Swamp 2 Upland Hardwood Forest Rich Mesophytic Forest 3 Impervious Area Developed Area 4 Open Water Open Water Detailed descriptions of each natural cover type are outlined below. 1. Forested Wetland - There are 2.37 acres of hardwood swamp that occurs in poorly drained depressions and inorganic soils on the. site. Red maple (Acer rubrum) is da"nant and the co dominants consist of American elm (Ulmus Americana), swamp white oak, (Quercus bicolor) and pin oak (Quercus palustris), The shrub layer consists mainly of . arrowood (Viburnum recognitum) spicebush (Lindera Benzoin), and Winterberry (Ilex verticillata). The herbaceous layer contains skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), tussock sedge (Carex stricta), sensitive fern (Onoclea Adams Fairacre Farm — Town ufWappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 11 sensibilis), and sphagnum moss (Sphagnum spp). Total wetland acreage will decrease to 1.88 acres as a result of the proposed development on the site. 2. Upland Hardwood Forest - There is currently 9.37 acres of upland forest community on the site. The dominant trees are red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Q. alba), black oak (Quercus velutina), black birch (Betula Ienta), white ash (Fraxinus americana), sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and black cherry (Prunus serotina) as well as shagbark hickory (Carya ovata). The shrub layer and ground layer here includes flowering dogwood (Cornus, florida), hop -hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), hornbeam (Carpinus carolinensis), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), barberry (Berberis thunbergi), honeysuckle (Lonicera sp.), witch hazel (Hamamelis virginia), and spinulose wood -fern (Dryopteris spinulosa). Approximately 8.57 acres of this habitat type will be removed for the proposed project. 3. Impervious Area - The property contains 0.60 acres of developed area or impervious surface including. single family residences and yard area: This acreage is expected to increase to 8.96 acres as a result of the proposed development activities. 4. Open Water - Currently there is 0.25 acres of open water area on the site. No portion of this. area will be impacted for this development. Project Description The project involves the construction of an Adams Fairacre Farm retail grocery store and associated improvements including: access roadway, parking lot, utility lines, and stormwatei management basin. on Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. The project is proposed in one phase and is expected to start construction next year and last for several months Permit Area (wetland /stream encroachments) The Applicant, Don Adams, is seeking authorization for the discharge of fill material to a total 0.49 acres of Federal jurisdictional wetland from the. United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and 33 CFR Part 330 under Nationwide Permit 39. Wetland Information Both of the wetland areas delineated on the property were surveyed for Bog Turtle habitat on August 27, 2007. Adams Fairacre Farm - Town ofWappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 12 Northern Wetland - This wetland is approximately a 0.25 acres vernal pool that is flooded during the spring and dry during the summer. Soils are hard and mineral based with only minor organic material present. This wetland has a canopy layer a little herbaceous vegetation present. This wetland is not bog turtle habitat due to the lack of any characteristics associated with Bog Turtle habitat including groundwater driven hydrology, suitable mucky soils, and low growing emergent vegetation. Southern wetland - This 2.1 acres wetland is a densely forested system (PFO1-90%) with an open water pond area and ditch that drains off the property under Route 9. The wetlands contain hard soils and dense canopy with no evident, flowages or rivulets. Substrate material is clay and the wetland is not considered bog turtle habitat. The "waters of the United States" including wetland areas and tributaries on the .property do not contain suitable hydrology or vegetative structure often associated with Bog Turtle habitat such as open, calcareous wet meadows or open calcareous boggy areas generally dominated by sedges (Carex spp) or sphagnum moss. Like other cold- blooded or ectothermic species, it requires habitats with a good deal of solar penetration for basking and nesting. No suitable emergent wetland was identified at the site and the wetlands on the site are densely vegetated or do not posses the hydrological support necessary for potential bog turtle habitat. No fen indicator species occur in any wetland on the property although some generic tussock sedge often associated with Bog Turtle nesting does occur on the site. Hydrology supporting the wetlands- on the site is primarily surface water and overland flow that appearsto fluctuate during each storm event. The fluctuating hydrology and lack of suitable vegetative structure negates the potential for bog turtle, habitat on the property. Adams Fairacre Farm - Town ofWappinger Indiana Bat/Sog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 13 4.0 CONCLUSION Bog Turtles.- No Bog turtle habitat was observed on any portion of the site during the. investigation. No mitigation is proposed for this species since there was no Bog Turtle habitat was observed on the site and no direct or indirect impacts to this species or habitat are anticipated. Indiana Bats - The property is considered to possess potential habitat for the Indiana Bat. It is understood that to avoid direct impacts to individual Indiana Bats removal of trees for construction activities or within building envelopes will occur during the time period from October 1 to March 30. No further mitigation is proposed for the Indiana Bat. '�#' d. A'���4%�� •vS � 2 4 �"r F � x ii17 0' C,s � e6o,} i lark N. 4 Adams Fairucre Farm - Town of Wappinger Indiana Bat/Bog Turtle Habitat Suitability Assessment Page 15 Figure 3 - Pond Area in Southern wetland Figure 4 - Upland Forest Area Alt, 4 August 1-2, 2008 Bat Conservation and Management, Inc, Cat -lisle, Pennsylvania Project Principal: Surveyors: Photography by: Summer Woodland Bat Survey Adams Fair Acre Farm August 1-2, 2008 Prepared for: Mr. Pat Adams c/o Adams Fairacre Farm 765 Dutchess Turnpike, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Prepared by: Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. 220 Old Stone House Road North, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17015 717-241-2228 (office and fax) 814-442-4246 (ceR) www.batmanagement.com Participating Personnel John Chenger Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. Nate Fuller Bat Conservation and Management Inc. Alex Noel Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. Doug Raybuck Bat Conservation and Managment, Inc Anna Scesny Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. Nate Fuller Doug Raybuck Morgan Vance 11 Brenna Smith Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. Morgan Vance Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. Report Prepared by: John Chenger Katie Day September 3, 2008 Executive Summary The objective of this study was to provide an inventory of summer bat species occurring in the vicinity of the proposed Adams Fair development. Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. (BCM) of Carlisle, Pennsylvania conducted a summer mist net survey meeting the protocols set forth in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Indiana Bat Revised Recovery Plan. Based on the acreage of the proposed development and the portion of the acreage with suitable bat roost habitat, eight (8) sites were selected for summer mist net surveys. A total of eighteen (18) bats of five (5) species were captured; including seven (7) Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis), five (5) big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus), three (3) little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus), two (2) northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis), and (1) eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis). Two female Indiana bats were radio tagged on 1 August 2008 and monitored for up to eleven (11) nights. Numerous observations were made of the two radio tagged Indiana bats and their activity maps are presented in Appendix D. Four day roosts were identified with a maximum emergence of thirteen (13) bats seen exiting a single roost tree. Both bats were radio tracked until observers concluded the transmitters failed. Properoboundaries are approximate, for detailed, updated wraps, contact the developer. 0 feet 1000, 2000 I FA PI Z: Nei IVI nt Level OT LTTOrT Trap type Site 1 Site 2 Totals Triple -high 4 4 8 Totals 4 4 8 One net night is any size or , ck of nets stretched between 2 poles. 3 Table Table 3: Capture Summary Sample Site Total Species Total Captures Name Nights Site 1 2 3 4 Site 2 2 4 j 14 Total 18 Table 4: Mist Net Site Totals Species Species Site Site Site 2 M Totals F Totals L PL Eptesicus fuscus M 0 3 3 2 F 0 2 2 Lasiurus borealis M o o a JV 0 0 1 F Q 1 1 Myotis lucifugus M 12 1 3 3 F 0 0 0 Myotis septentrionalisF PL 0 0 1 0 JV 1 0 0 1 Myotis septentrionalis 2 0 0 1 Myotis sodalis nFn 2 L 0 0 0 7 2 3 5 Totals JV Q 0 4 14 18 9 9 18 18 5: Reproductive Gonanion OT remam Species Site 1 Site 2 NR Totals L PL JV Eptesicus fuscus NR 0 2 2 2 L 0 0 0 PL 0 0 1 0 JV 0 0 0 Lasiurus borealis NR 0 1 1 1 L 0 0 0 PL 0 0 1 0 JV 1 0 0 0 Myotis septentrionalis NR 1 0 1 1 L 0 0 0 PL 0 0 0 JV Q 0 0 Myotis sodalis NR 0 1 1 5 L 0 0 0 PL 2 2 4 ,lv 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Totals 3 1 6 9 1 5 1 0 1 4 9 0 9 NR=non-reproductive, r= pregnant, rL= posr-iacraung, J v-Juvetrue Bats Discussion A total of eighteen (18) bats of five (5) species were captured; including seven (7) Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis), five (5) big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus), three (3) little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus), two (2) northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis), and (1) eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis). A review of the literature about Indiana myotis summer habitat, maternity roost characteristics, and foraging behavior indicates that limited forest clearing may not significantly impact the quality of habitat for the species, especially if it is done in conjunction with snag -retention and new plantings of select native tree species in buffer or edge habitat. Most maternity colonies for the species are found in disturbed habitat, and in areas fragmented by small widely spaced clearings. IBATs have been shown to be exceptionally adaptable to roost switching and selecting new roosts when old roosts are no longer available as long as adequate density of potential roost trees remain. The very ephemeral nature of their preferred roost spaces encourages this type of plasticity. In one study, only 50% of the roost trees identified by radio -tracking were used in the following year. Extreme care should be taken to protect existing water resources in the area from siltation, contamination, temperature change, or destruction during any clearing activities. The water resources are key drinking sites for bats as well as critical sources of insect prey. Vegetation lining streams and other waterways should be preserved in place as should the natural substrate of the stream bottom in order to assure a diversity of insect hatches throughout the warm season when reproductively active bats are in the area. Possible habitat enhancement efforts should include the deliberate retention of snag trees with key structural and micro climate characteristics deemed critical for IBAT maternity roosts. This is achieved through the retention of large diameter snag trees that receive day -long sun exposure, which contain exfoliating bark or other crevices, and which are located along edge habitats or in small clearings. Any dead or dying trees should be preserved in place rather than removed from the area. The long term landscaping plans should include a significant number of shagbark and shellbark hickory trees, which are highly valued by bats for their roost characteristics throughout the entire life of the tree. Plantings that provide travel corridors through future developments and that connect larger forest tracts are especially valuable. In the interim, well constructed artificial roosts constructed of weather -resistant plastic, resin, concrete, or metal could be installed in appropriate set aside areas to provide additional roost sites, but only if they are situated in areas of full sun where they can approximate critical temperatures required for maternity roosts. Indiana bats accounted for 38% of the total captures. Summer compliance surveys like the one conducted here offer only a snapshot of bat diversity on the landscape scale. Few, if any, studies have been conducted in New York to track a colony of bats for an extended period. The discovery in more recent years of IBATs found among suburban areas in New York, New Jersey, and Maryland suggest these animals are successful in this habitat. Should additional mitigation be deemed necessary, opportunities may exist at this location to further study a larger number. of IBAT roost trees systematically over the course of the development project. Project goals could include establishing a base inventory of IBAT roost trees in the immediate area during the present pre -construction state and then repeating those assessments over the course of future years. Future assessments would take into account any habitat enhancement, artificial roost use, and foraging behavior modifications over several seasons of use. In this way it may be possible to track IBAT habitat mitigation success at this particular site and could be a model for future land management decisions. 7 Bat Survey Data Form Bat Conservation and Managemnt, Inc, - 814-442-4246 Coun!h—&Nl,[ Pte' Ad&,,j,;,, SiteM NOM #: St Nam: A�U, S D*: I �, 1, 1) g Latitude; ti) -i DaW - T!'O 10 BY: v0f - da, i Obs�h,,,�,-)tt ?d Adwl flet open *w AcW nd 6 4. F L '�2v� 15 Unu Nd Descd Moon~ iw*md-d-ww*iw,6 ki" of wwbws: f We= LM H: t u1sw6ance coda: pwaft: sof Ow Bat Survey Data Form EW Conservation and Management, Inc. - 814-442-040 ps" — Of I i !j1111111 I Sat Survey Data Form Bat Conservation and Management, Inc. - 814-W-4246 Re f: 2- 1 NO N: I Site Narm: A F a Dalc �V, La": i! Obamrs; Adwl W AM net open bnw r� 05' dose tirm: 2,7 k75" , 912 �C. wM D.� k&un Level 1: Afj SRO "Ch t4 G Bat Survev Data Form U Conwrvallun and Management, IM, - B14-442-4248 Pigg —af— 11 logo wm_==Mm 11 Representative Site Photographl Net Site I Net Site 2 Net Site I 13 Appendix C Indiana Bat Sampling Protocol Note: These Guidelines are extracted from the April 2007 Draft Revised Indiana Bat Recovery Plan. RATIONALE A typical mist -net survey is an attempt to determine presence or probable absence of the species; it does not provide sufficient data to determine population size or structure. Following these guidelines will standardize procedures for mist netting. It will help maximize the potential for capture of Indiana bats at a minimum acceptable level of effort, Although capture of bats confirms their presence, failure to catch bats does not absolutely confirm their absence. Netting effort as extensive as outlined below usually is sufficient to capture Indiana bats if they are present. However, there have been instances in which additional effort yielded detection when the standard effort did not. Some mist -netting projects will require modification (or clarification) of these guidelines; these situations should be resolved through coordination with the Service Field Office responsible for the state in which your project occurs. Consultation with the Field Office is always recommended, particularly for large-scale netting efforts. / The Service accepts the results of these surveys to determine presence for the purposes of Section 7 consultation. Survey results are valid for at least two years. NETTING SEASON: May 15 -August 15 May 15 -August 15 are acceptable limits for documenting the presence of summer populations of Indiana bats, especially maternity colonies. (However, see Kiser and MacGregor 2005 for precautions regarding early -season surveys between May 15 and June 1, as well as late -season surveys between August 1 and August 15). Capture of reproductive adult females (i.e., pregnant; lactating, or post -lactating) and/or young of the year during May 15 -August 15 indicates that a nursery colony is active in the area. Outside these dates, data cannot be used to document the presence or probable absence of summer populations. EQUIPMENT Mist nets to be used for Indiana bat surveys should be the finest, lowest visibility mesh commercially available: 1) In the past, this was 1 ply, 40 denier monofilament --denoted 40/1; 2) Currently, monofilament is not available, and the finest on the market is 2 ply, 50 denier nylon denoted 50/2; 3). The finest mesh size available is approximately 38 mm (-1 1/2 in). No specific hardware is required, There are many suitable systems of ropes and/or poles to hold nets. The system of Gardner et al. (1989) has been widely used, See NET PLACEMENT below for minimum net heights, habitats, and other netting requirements that affect the choice of hardware. 15 NET PLACEMENT Potential travel corridors such as streams or logging trails typically are the most effective places to net. Place nets approximately perpendicular across the corridor. Nets should fill the corridor from side to side and from stream (or ground) level up to the overhanging canopy. A typical set is 7 m high consisting of three or more nets stacked on top one another and up to 20 m wide. (Nets of different width may be used as the situation dictates). Occasionally it may be desirable to net where there is no good corridor. Take caution to get nets up into the canopy. The typical equipment described in the section above may be inadequate for these situations, requiring innovation on the part of the researchers. Exercise safety precautions when placing nets. Poles and nets should be clear of overhead wires. See Kiser and MacGregor (2005) for additional discussion of net placement. RECOMMENDED NET SITE SPACING Stream and other linear corridors — one net site per km (0.6 mi) of stream or corridor. Non -corridor study areas — two net sites per square km of habitat (equivalent to one net site per 123 acres). The Service Field Office responsible for the state in which your project occurs should be consulted during survey design to resolve issues related to net site spacing for specific projects. MINIMUM LEVEL OF EFFORT Netting at each site should include at least four net nights, consisting of: 1) a minimum of two net locations at each site (at least 30 m apart, especially in linear habitat such as a stream . corridor); and 2) a minimum of two nights of netting (i.e., two net locations for two nights = four net nights per site). A "net night' is defined as one net set up for one night. The sample period should begin at sunset and continue for at least 5 hours (longer sample periods may improve success). For purposes of determining presence or probable absence of Indiana bats, four net nights at a site are not required if Indiana bats are caught sooner (i.e,, if Indiana bats are caught on the first night of netting, a second night is not required for purposes of documenting presence). CHECKING NETS Each net should be checked approximately every 10 minutes. Some researchers prefer continuous monitoring (with or without an electronic bat detector); care should be taken to avoid noise and movement near the nets if this technique is used. When monitoring the site continuously with a bat detector, bats can be detected immediately when they are captured in the net. Prompt removal from the net decreases stress on the bat and potential for the bat to escape (MacCarthy et al, 2006). IBAT943 emerges Room 943.1 at dusk and forages within two distinct areas on both sides of Macfarlane Rood within U mile ofthe roost the entire might. This bar returned to Roon: 943.1 bY 3M AA4, Similar to 813, IBAT 943 emerges Room 943.1 at dusk ai0for(qes within two distinct areas on both sides qI'Macfarlane Road within 0.5 mile of the roost the entire night. This bat returned to Roost 943.1 by 2:00 AM. 17 I 012� Iff'IT21=1 A SiMil,07- to previous nights, IBAT943 emerges Roost 943.1 at dusk: and.lbrages within Iwo distillct areas on both sides qf Maclarlane Road within 0.5 mile of the roost the entire night. This bat returned to Roost 943.1 hry 3:15 AM. BAT #943 Activity Mapi August IBAT943 ernerged Roost 943.1 at dusk and forages within two dislinct areas on both sides of Macfarlane Road within 0.5 mile of the roost the entire night. This hat established a new roost tree (floost 943.21 Just after 2:00 AM, 19 i;�iiil llill;:ir ;;�Iqqjll��;�Ir 1111111 ir �m�lll I gz� IBAT943 emerged from the Roost 943.1 vicinit-vat dusk andjoraged within hvo distinct are.as on both sides of "Macfarlane Road withiri 0,5 mile of the roost the entire night. The ramsmitter likely expired.just after /:00 and was not recovered again. IBAT #863 Activity Map August 1 Female IBAT 863 wos captured at net site 2 and released at 2:50 AM, The bort ,foroged in the innnediale viciniofor 90 Olhwles before entering Roost 803,1 at 4:30 AM. m IJill 11!11 0 : Z W=22= IBA7*863jbraged in the immediate vicinity of the roost the entire night before returning to Roost 863.1 at 4:30 AM. IBAT863 emerged Roost 863.1 (it dusk and spent three hours foraging near the roost tree. The bat spent almost four hours possibly in either qftwo locations north of the roost where the transmitter could not be detected, The bat returned to forage near the roost (it 3:18 AM and returned to Roost 863.2 at 4:16 AM, 23 BAT #863 Activity Map August 8 lb Or J, E QIP .. . .......... Pm( O"t I YiW k Actio Area IBAT86.3 foraged in the immeehate vicinity ); (!f the roost fiw- 30 minutes belore the but mws lost to the north, jwvsumobly to the noi-rhernfi)raging ei)'ea whew the signal is difficult to frack. The wanmnittei- inay have expired orjWlen offin this area and was nevei, recovered. 25 r.9 COPY JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS' ■ .C■ TRAFFIC•TRANSPOATATION ENGINEERS 11 HRAQHURST AVENUE - HAWTHORNE, N,Y. • 10532•(914)347,7500•FAX(914)347.7266 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS U.S. ROUTE 9 AND OLD STATE ROAD TOWN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK JOB NO. 170 AUGUST 28, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. SECTION I - INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 1 B. SCOPE OF STUDY 1 SECTION II - EXISTING ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK 3 B. 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4 SECTION III - EVALUATION OF FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6 B. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6 C. ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTIONS 7 D. 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7 E. DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS PROCEDURES 7 F. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 G. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 12 APPENDIX A - FIGURES APPENDIX B - TABLES APPENDIX C - CAPACITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX D - LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Page I SECTION I INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Figure No. 1) Adams Fairacre Farms is proposing to construct a new approximately 68,000 square foot facility on property located on the east side of Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, New York. The property has access to Old Post Road, which connects with Route 9 at two points, the southerly most location is opposite Fowlerhouse Road. The site location is identified on Figure No. 1. The proposed development is expected to be completed in the next several years and a Design Year of 2010 has been considered in evaluating future traffic conditions with the completion of the proposed facility. B. SCOPE OF STUDY This study has been prepared to evaluate both existing and future traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site and to assess the potential impact of the proposed facility on the surrounding roadway network. The report has been prepared for submission to the Town of Wappinger and the New York State Department of Transportation. Detailed traffic counts were collected at various intersections in the vicinity of the site to identify existing traffic volumes for various peak periods. In addition, traffic data was also obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation as well as from other studies in the area. Together this information was utilized to establish the Existing Traffic Volumes for the intersections studied. Page 2 The Existing Traffic Volumes were projected to the future design year utilizing a background growth factor, which was developed on historical information from the New York State Department of Transportation. This resulted in the 2010 No -Build Traffic Volumes. Estimates of the expected site generated traffic volumes, which will be generated by the proposed store, were computed based on information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as well as from the results of previous traffic counts at the existing Adams Fairacre Farms located in Newburgh, New York, Based on this information, the peak hour trip generation rates and corresponding Site Generated Traffic Volumes were identified for each of the peak periods. The site generated traffic volumes were then assigned to the roadway network based on an arrival and departure distribution which was developed based upon a review of existing traffic patterns in the area as well as a review of the population centers surrounding the site. The Site Generated Traffic Volumes were then combined with the Design Year No -Build Traffic Volumes to obtain the Build Traffic Volumes. A capacity analysis was conducted at each of the intersections utilizing the Existing, No - Build and Build Traffic Volumes to determine Levels of Service and operating conditions. The analyses were completed utilizing the procedures outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Based on the results of the analysis, recommendations for improvements were then made where necessary. Page 3 SECTION II EXISTING ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK As indicated previously, the site is located off of Old Post Road. A description of this and other key area roadways is as follows: 1. U.S. Route 9 - is a major arterial which traverses throughout Dutchess County. The roadway section varies throughout its length with the area adjacent to the site consisting of two through lanes per direction plus turn lanes and shoulders. Areas further north and further south of this area have additional through lanes. In the immediate vicinity of the site, U.S. Route 9 has a signalized intersection with Old Hopewell Road (County Route 28) and "stop" sign controlled intersections with Fowlerhouse Road, Old Post Road, McFarland Road and also Osborne Hill Road. 2. Old Hopewell Road (C.R. 28) — originates at a "T" intersection with NYS Route 82. It continues in a westerly direction into the Town of Wappinger intersecting with other roadways including All Angels Hill Road (County Route 94), Cedar Hill Road, Spook Hill Road and several other roadways. It intersects with U.S. Route 9 at a signalized four-way intersection where the roadway is widened for turning lanes. The roadway continues to the west intersecting with NYS Route 9D at a signalized intersection and then continues west to New Hamburgh. Page 4 3. Old Post Road — is a two lane roadway which originates at a "stop" sign controlled "T" intersection with U.S. Route 9. It continues in an easterly then southwesterly direction, serving various commercial developments passing the site and connecting with U.S. Route 9 at an unsignalized section opposite Fowlerhouse Road. 4. Osborne Hill Road (C.R. 35) - is a two lane county highway which originates in the Village of Fishkill, continues in a generally northerly direction into the Town of Wappinger and terminates at the intersection with U.S. Route 9 at a "stop" sign controlled "T" intersection. At this intersection, only right turn movements are permitted on and off of U.S. Route 9. 5. McFarland Road — is a two lane roadway which originates at a "stop" sign controlled "T" intersection with U.S. Route 9. At this intersection, U.S. Route 9 has two through lanes per direction plus shoulders and a southbound separate left turn lane. The roadway continues in an easterly direction intersecting with other local roadways including Becchwood Circle, Scarborough Lane and the provides access to Old Hopewell Road. B. 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Figures No. 2, 3 and 4) All available traffic count data for the U.S. Route 9 corridor were obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. In addition, representatives of John Collins Engineers, P.C. collected detailed turning movement traffic counts at the following intersections. Page 5 1. U.S. Route 9 and Old Hopewell Road (C.R. 28) i 2. U.S. Route 9 and Fowlerhouse Road/Old Post Road 3. U.S. Route 9 and Old Post Road 4. U.S. Route 9 and Osborne Hill Road (C.R. 35) The counts at these locations were collected over several days including Thursday, January 11, 2007 for the Weekday PM Hours, Friday, January 12, 2007 for the Weekday AM Hours and Saturday, January 13, 2007 for the Saturday Hours. These were supplemented with counts collected during March and June 2007 and also compared to other historical count data. Based on a review of the traffic counts, the peak hours were determined to generally occur as follows: Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour — 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour — 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM f Peak Saturday Hour 12:00 Noon to 1:00 PM The resulting 2007 Existing Traffic Volumes for each of these intersections for each of the peak hours are shown on Figures No. 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Page. 6 �'. CR("T'Tn'NT TTY EVALUATION OF FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS An evaluation of future traffic conditions with and without the proposed store was completed. A description of the procedures, results of analysis and recommendations are presented in the following sections. A. 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Figures No. 5,6 and 7). The 2007 Existing Traffic Volumes were projected to the future 2010 Design Year utilizing a background growth factor of 3% per year or a factor of 1.09. This factor was utilized to account for normal background traffic growth as well as the effect of other development traffic in the corridor. The resulting 2010 No -Build Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 5, 6 and 7 for each of the peak hours. B. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Table No. 1) Estimated of the expected site generated traffic volumes where computed based upon a review of other existing stores as well as data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as contained in their report entitled, "Trip Generation", 7t' Edition, 2003. Table No. 1 summarizes the hourly trip generation rates and corresponding traffic volumes for each of the peak hours. It should be noted that based on the studies of other similar facilities and the ITE data, a major portion of the trips generated by this type of facility are attracted either as "pass -by" or "diverted link" trips from the surrounding roadway network. These studies have shown that as much as 40% of the traffic generated Page 7 is attracted from the existing traffic stream. For the purpose of this analysis and as indicated in Table No. 1, a 25% "pass -by" credit is reflected as the "new trips" indicated in the table. C. ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTIONS (Figures No. 8 and 9) Based upon a review of the existing traffic volumes in the area together with the overall population of the surrounding area, arrival and departure distributions were developed to assign the site generated traffic to the site. Figures No. 8 and 9 identify the anticipated arrival and departure distributions, respectively for the project. D. 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Figures No. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) Utilizing the arrival and departure distributions identified above, the Site Generated Traffic Volumes shown on Table No. 1 where assigned to the various intersections and driveways. Figures No. 10, 11 and 12 indicate the Site Generated Traffic Volumes at each intersection for each of the peak hours. These Site Generated Traffic Volumes were combined with the 2010 No -Build Traffic Volumes to obtain the 2010 Build Traffic Volumes for each of the intersections for each of the peak hours. The resulting 2010 Build Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 13, 14 and 15, respectively. . E. DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS PROCEDURES In order to determine existing and future traffic operating conditions at the study area intersections, it was necessary to perform capacity analyses. The following is a brief description of the analysis method utilized in this report: Page 8 o Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis The capacity analysis for a signalized intersection was performed in accordance with the procedures described in the 2000 Hi hwa CLapacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board. The terminology used in identifying traffic flow conditions is Levels of Service. A Level of Service "A" represents the best condition and a Level of Service "F" represents the worst condition. A Level of Service "C" is generally used as a design standard while a Level of Service "D" is acceptable during pear periods. A Level of Service "E" represents an operation near capacity. In order to identify an intersection's Level of Service, the average amount of vehicle delay is computed for each approach to the intersection as well as for the overall intersection, o Un&nalized Intersection Capacity Analysis The unsignalized intersection capacity analysis method utilized in this report was also performed in accordance with the procedures described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The procedure is based on total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. The average total delay for any particular critical movement is a function of the service rate or capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. In order to identify the Level of Service, the average amount of vehicle delay is computed for each critical movement to .the intersection. Additional information concerning signalized and unsignalized Levels of Service can be found in Appendix "D" of this report.. Page 9 F. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Table No. 2) A capacity analysis was conducted at each of the intersections and site driveway for each of the peak hours utilizing the procedures described above. The analyses were conducted for Existing, No -Build and Build Conditions, Table No. 2 provides a summary of the Levels of Service and average vehicle delays for each of the intersections. Based on the results of the analyses, recommendations for improvements were also identified. The following provides a summary of each of the intersections analyzed, results of the analyses and any recommended improvements. 1. U.S. Route 9 and Old Hopewell Road-(C.R. 28 U.S. Route 9 intersects with Old Hopewell Road at a signalized full movement intersection. The northbound and southbound approaches of Route 9 consist of two through lanes, a separate right turn lane and a separate left turn lane. The eastbound approach consist of one left, one through and one right turn lane while the westbound approach consist of a shared left/through and a separate right turn lane. The intersection is controlled by an actuated traffic signal. The capacity analyses conducted at this intersection indicate that during the PM Peak Hour, under current conditions, this intersection experiences some long delays on certain movements especially left turn movements from U.S. Route 9 northbound. The intersection was re -analyzed utilizing the Future 2010 No -Build Traffic Volumes. A review of this analysis indicates that the delays are expected to Page 10 continue during peak hours. Signal timing will have to continue to be monitored to insure the most efficient operation, The intersection was re -analyzed with the Future 2010 Build Traffic Volumes. A review of this analysis indicates that Level of Service similar to the No -Build conditions can be expected at the intersection. As discussed below, associated with the signalization of the Route 9 and Fowlerhouse Road intersection, it will be important to interconnect the new signal with this signal to provide a coordinated and efficient traffic flow. 2. U.S. Route 9 and Fowlerhouse Road/Old Post Road At this intersection, U.S. Route 9 consists of two through lanes per direction together with separate left turn lanes. The intersection is presently controlled by "stop" signs. The capacity analyses conducted at this intersection indicates that long delays are experienced by traffic exiting from the side roads at this location. The analysis indicates that under future conditions these delays will continue to increase. Associated with the construction of the new store and based on the projected traffic volumes, a traffic signal will be required at this intersection in the future. A copy of the traffic signal warrant analysis is shown in Table W-1. The capacity analysis conducted at this intersection utilizing the Future 2010 Build Traffic Volumes indicates that with signalization, widening of the westbound approach to provide two full lanes and widening of the northbound approach to provide a separate right turn lane will also be required. With these improvements, the intersection will operate at an overall Level of Service "C" or better during peak Page 11 periods. The interconnection of this traffic signal with the other signals along U.S. Route 9 will have to be coordinated through discussions with the New York State Department of Transportation as part of the Highway Work Permit process. 3. U.S. Route 9 and Old Post Road Under current conditions, Old Post Road intersects with U.S. Route 9 at a "T" intersection. This intersection operates as a right turn in/right turn out intersection. The analysis of the intersection indicates that Levels of Service "C" or better is currently and will continue to be experienced at this location under future condition. 4. U.S, Route 9 and Osborne Hill Road (CR 35) The Osborne Hill Road approach to this intersection consists of one lane and U.S. Route 9 is two lanes per direction. No median opening is present on U.S. Route 9. The capacity analysis conducted at this intersection indicates that during peak periods eastbound traffic consists only of right turns which are accommodated at a Level of Service "C". The analysis indicates that under Future Build Conditions similar Levels of Service will be experienced. 5. Old Post Road and Proposed Site Access Driveways The site will be served by two driveway connections to Old Post Road. The southerly driveway will serve as an "entry only" driveway where as the northerly driveway will accommodate both entry and exiting vehicles. Associated with the construction of these driveways, improvements along Old Post Road will be needed including widening approaching U.S. Route 9 as previously discussed. This design has been chosen to provide separation of the site exiting movements from the U.S. Route 9 intersection. Page 12 The exiting traffic from the northerly driveway should be controlled by a "stop" sign. A review of the capacity analysis for this intersection indicates that a Level of Service `B" or better will be provided for traffic exiting the site. It is recommended that the site driveway consist of a separate left and a separate right turn lane on the exiting approach. In addition, appropriate pavement markings and signing should. be installed to control traffic movements. G. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the analysis contained herein, with the completion of the improvements identified above, traffic conditions in the area will not be significantly negatively impacted by the proposed store. Safe and efficient movement of vehicles will occur at the site access intersections. The on-site signing and striping will have to be added to the final site plans to provide proper and efficient traffic control. This will have to be reviewed with the Town as part of the site plan approval process. Respectfully submitted, JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. Philip J. Gre.aly, Ph.D., P.E. 170.TIS APPENDIX "All FIGURES NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE AUAIwI�i F AIRAGRE FARMS SITE LOCATION MAP )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.1 1 i—' 26 27 56--+ 90—► as w OLD }iOpEWELL ROAD 122-'+ om^' {C,R 28} 4 2 0 ¢ Z o 10- - 4� SITE 1 Loecc Y FOWLER�� �— ROAD Cp,RD R0 1) 3 42 6 y Q 0 0 0 J� 2-14 BOG ar� � d) 0 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK AM HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.2 1 m co M m �L63 29 160 118- t 10, OLD HOPEWELL ROAD 120—* iC R �8} 4 2 Q N o ntni +-7� 1 �° 4 4 t� 2� 4 0-� m p 6� k �r o� SITE 1 p FOWLER'r Nf �o CARS RO�4p k 3 -LA 0 0 .\ h'c w � G 2� 0 - NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES (, )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK PM HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO. 3 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKEND PEAK SAT HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 F1G. NO.4 OLD HOPEWELL ROAD Kh VN _�Q7 S� FOWLF.R't� �0 AO I� 0 Et c.2a SITE 1/ ma � a 1 37 f-138 33-i tl n�i NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK AM HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.5 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK PM HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.6 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE AUAMS F AIRACRE FARMS 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKEND PEAK SAT HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO..170. DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO. .7 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE AUAMS F AIKAGHE FARMS ARRIVAL DISTRIBUTION WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW FORK JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG.. NO.8 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 1.70 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.9 r52 OLD HOPEWELL ROAD F(yWLER`� ROAa N o�0 0 f-1 2 12-iI NNN/ i 0 0 �30 S.I TE 1 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO Sr.Ai F ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGLR, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK AM HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 200-1 FIG. NO. 10 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE AUAMJ I-AIKAL;Nt FAKM�i SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ( )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK PM HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE. , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO. 11 i^r2iAW1 t Qnen NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE /AUHMJ r AIKAC:Kt F AKMS SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKEND PEAK SAT HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG, NO.12 QLD HOPEWELL 43 4-2 urn N 4-23 r� W Fad RQA� SITE k V � 4� N °° !:l �i 447 *--1 -51 63---+ 98—► rn J NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT To qrm F ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKDAY PEAK AM HOUR JOHN COLI_INS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE:. JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.13 AU.AMS f AIKAUHL FARMS `WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW- YORK PROJECT NO. 170 NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HOUR DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG.. NO.14 HOP'EWELL ROAD, NOTE: LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SC AUAMZ> V AIKAUKt I~ AKMS 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES )WN OF WAPPINGER, NEW YORK WEEKEND PEAK SAT HOUR JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. HAWTHORNE , NEW YORK PROJECT NO. 170 DATE: JUNE 2007 FIG. NO.15 APPENDIX "B"I TABLES TABLE NO, 1 HOURLY TRIP GENERATION RATES (HTGR) AND ANTICIPATED SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS WAPPINGER NY ENTRY EXIT HTGR* VOLUME . NEW TRAFFIC HTGR* VOLUME NEW TRAFFIC ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS 68,842 S.F. PEAK AM HOUR 2.34 161 121 2.34 161 121 PEAK PM HOUR 5.10 351 263 5.10 351 263 PEAK SAT HOUR 5.38 370 278 5.38 370 278 NOTES: 1) * THE HOURLY TRIP GENERATION RATES (HTGR) ARE BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS (ITE) AS CONTAINED IN THE TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 7TH EDITION, 2003. ITE LAND USE CODE -850 - SUPERMARKET. 2) THE NEW TRIPS REPRESENT A 25% CREDIT FOR PASS -BY TRIPS DUE TO THE ATTRACTION OF A PORTION OF TRIPS FROM THE EXISTING TRAFFIC STREAM. 08/27/2007 JCE JOB 170 LU J m +r N W W �..� u OO ? H � W N W 0 W W a z F O T O mFz* N F a iD M' N d u} 1- O [h bi 00 C7 " n.. W , i , co ,ii Q N W CV u a ; L N_ n u w U w w U U U O U U Z Q 0 J _ _ r N? t` M v O F 00 a� u E , , hV M 7 M N� n~ 00 0o Fiw�rL 0mU0c_> U am N CV O F ICJ r g 4 r N M 0) SL C6 06 �M t0 COm Im N �� — h. h m m 0 0 0 U m cA U CU m U Q Q 37 co OCl O t[> m CO C!M CD C.D. ap t~ m r r r N © .�.r w w U W W � U U y LL U m N 'ti' ti r N a W N w i , i , , Qi O wwwwu. ,~_. 00 u' U 0 N s- CO ar �j r CV CC tai C7 N �A C'�S 00 th O F a0 F U w00 0 0 tL U Z � ap aD O tp O CL a ti ori co m >L h W 0www (jZ W U o 0 N 0p CV m i+ F to ry v CA v c -i w q^p m0C)UU CD LL6.4 U 0 w J G W J m m m m I ¢ m m CO m m N a a N 4 i/5 Mu Zzcowy m.m m zcnw�j Z.w m zto Co m m O Z z z M z m 0 cc L UY z N _ <Y ` ? ` C3 o o n a a LL o J }yW �a Q CL' Z J (C WLu inIl' 11.1 w W W c> w 0 0 r 00 p p m a p Q Na to A 0 CG Cl) w z a� W z a W 0 10 W a z SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES (Based on Manual of Uhiform Traffic Control Devices, New York State DOT) INTERSECTION DATA LWOR STREET............ U:S. ROUTE 9 MINOR STREET ............. OLD POST ROAD/FOWLER HOUSE RD. LOCATION ..................... WAPPINGER, NY DATE .............................. AUGUST 2007 VOLUME BASIS., ...... .... MACHINE COUNTIrURNING MOVEMEN CONDITION .................. WEEKDAY CHARACTERISTICS Number Of Lanes For Moving Traffic By Approac6----] Major Street (Excluding Auxiliary Lanes) = 2 Minor Street(Including Auxiliary Lanes = 2 5 85 % 5 ,eed >= 40 m {Y or Nl.---> N Median " I Raised median W or more in TIME VOLUMES WARRANT 1 WARRANT 2 WARRANT ME "'y Begin 07WAM mayor minor Street StreetStreet 3188 35 Major Minor Street 600 200 - Major Minor Street Street 900 1130 1 2 WOO AM 2791 106 600 200 900 100 NO NO OWWAM 2358 117 600 200 900 100 NO YES 10mAM 2256 117 600 200 900 100 NO YES 11,00 AM 2220 205 600 200 900 100 NO YES 12,00 PM 2791 256 -600 2130 900 100 YES YES OtIm PM 2745 265 600 200 900 100 YES YES nem PM 2932 285 600 200 900 100 YES YES 03100 PM 3572 289 600 200 900 100 YES YES K00 PM 4054 295 600 200 900 100 YES YES 05:00 PM 3908 308 600 200 900 100 YES YES 0510 PM 2920 259 600 200 900 100 YES YES R7:OOPM 0 0 600 200 900 100 YES YES 08:00 PM 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO Dampen 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO 10:00 PM 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO 11mPM 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO 12.W AM 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO 01:00AM 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO o2:o0AM 0 0 800 200 900 100 NO NO OMAM 0 0 600 200 900 100 - NO NO 0400AM 0 0 600 200 900 100 No NO 05m AM 0 0 600 200 900 100 NO NO 06:00 AM --2---0 600 200 900 100 NO NO NO NO TOTAL HOURS MEETING WARRANTS 8 11 TOTAL HOURS NEEDED TO SATISFY 8 8 0 APPENDIX Itcat CAPACITY ANALYSIS HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL.RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: ,TUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK AM HOUR Year 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES I. Project ID: 170AMEX1 E/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R j L T 1 I R L T R 1 II No . Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I LT R Volume 156 90 122 1127 126 132 I L T R 1 L T R 1 1130 848 32 176 2211 48 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 1.1.0 11.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 27.0 8.0 40.0 Mellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lape Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 240 801 0.26 0.30 24.5 C T 543 1810 0.18 0.30 23,5 C 24.2 C R 461 1538 0..30 0.30 24.6 C Westbound LT 415 1382 0.68 0.30 32.1 C 29.6 C R 446 1487 0.33 0.30 24.9 C Northbound L 234 1719 0.62 0.59 20.9 C T 1531 3445 0.62 0.44 19.9 B 19.8 B R 684 1538 0.05 0.44 14.3 B Southbound L 302 1662 0.28 0.59 10.9 B T 1531 3445 0.88 0.44 29.0 C 27.5 C R 684 1538 0.08 0.44 14.4 B Inter8'ection Delay = 24.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK PM HOUR Year 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMEX1 ( a/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I h T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I LT R I L T R I L T R Volume 1116 160 120 1160 129 163 1221 1519 98 1198 1328 81 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 30 1 30 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4'1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A j SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A { Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right A [ EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right A Green 32.0 19.0 21.0 78.0 fellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 170.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) VIC g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 195 1743 0.63 0.11 78.3 E T 205 1835 0.82 0.11 96.3 F 79.0 E R 413 1560 0.23 0.26 49.2 D Westbound LT 336 1787 0.90 R 487 1561 0.29 Northbound L 218 1761 1.07 T 1619 3529 0.99 R 1065 1575 0.10 Southbound L 212 1719 0.98 T 1635 3564 0.86 R 908 1591 0.09 Intersection Delay = 67.0 0.19 0.31 0.12 0.46 0.68 94.2 F 78.6 E 44.6 D 154.9 F 64.9 E 72.8 E 9.6 A 0.12 130.5 F 0.46 45.7 D 54.6 D 0.57 16.6 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter_: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas .Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Year 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATEXI E/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound1 I Southbound I L I T R 1 L T R i L T R I L T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 I I 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 I 1 1 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I LT R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1106 97 125 1241 86 116 1116 1450 93 1273 1359 66 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 12.0. 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 0 1 . 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 27.0 8.0 40.0 fellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 190 633 0.59 0.30 31.6 C T 543 1810 0.19 0.30 23.5 C 26.5 C R 461 1538 0..29 0.30 24.5 C Westbound LT 377 1256 0.92 0.30 56.8 E 48.3 D R 446 1487 0.27 0.30 24.4. C Northbound L 234 1719 0.52 0.59 18.7 B T 1531 .3445 1.00 0.44 47.1 D 43.3 D R 684 1538 0.14 0.44 14.9 B Southbound L 228 1662 1.26 0.59 173.2 F T 1531 .3445 0.93 0.44 34.8 C 56.2 E R 684 1538 0.10 0.44 14.6 B Intersection Delay = 47.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound j Westbound 1 Northbound Southbound L T R 1 L T R 1.L T R { L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig I L T R 1 LT R 1 L T R L T R Volume 161 98 133 1138 137 144 1142 924 35 183 1320 52 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0.112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 i2.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4. ) 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 27.0 8.0 40.0 'ellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs - Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: (s) Period: PEAK AM HOUR Year 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMNBI a/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE'9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound j Westbound 1 Northbound Southbound L T R 1 L T R 1.L T R { L T R No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig I L T R 1 LT R 1 L T R L T R Volume 161 98 133 1138 137 144 1142 924 35 183 1320 52 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0.112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 i2.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4. ) 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 27.0 8.0 40.0 'ellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs - Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c 67 7C- Delay LOS Delay LOS 8astbound L 221 737 0.31 0.30 25.1 C T 543 1810 0.20 0.30 23.6 C 24.5 C R 461 1538 0.32 0.30 24.8 C Westbound LT 412, 1374 0.74 0.30 35.3 D 31.8 C R 446 1487 0.36 0.30 25.2 C Northbound L 234 1719 0.68 0.59 25.2 C T 1531 3445 0.67 0.44 20.9 C 21.3 C R 684 1538 0.06 0.44 14.3 B Southbqund L 277 1662 0.33 0.59 1.1.9 B T 1531 3445 0.96 0.44 38.5 D 36.1 D R 684 1538 0.08 0.44 14.5 B Intersection Delay = 29.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK PM HOUR Year 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMNB1 I VW St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION. SUMMARY Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1. Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A } Right A Peds I Peds NB Right A j EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 32.0 19.0 21.0 78.0 fellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 A11 Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 170.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 195 1743 0.68 0.11 82.0 F T 205 1835 0.89 0.11 109.7 F 85.9 F R 413 1560 0.26 0.26 49..6 D Westbound LT I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound j Southbound 1 487 L T R L T R J L T R I L T R No. Lanes T 1619 3529 1 [ 1 2 1 1575 1 1 j 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 LGConfig } L T R I LT R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1126 174 131 1174 141 178 1241 1656 107 1216 1448 88 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 30 1 30 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1. Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A } Right A Peds I Peds NB Right A j EB Right A SB Right A 1 WB Right A Green 32.0 19.0 21.0 78.0 fellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 A11 Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 170.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 195 1743 0.68 0.11 82.0 F T 205 1835 0.89 0.11 109.7 F 85.9 F R 413 1560 0.26 0.26 49..6 D Westbound LT 336 1787 0.99 R 487 1561 0.32 Northbound L 218 1761 1.17 T 1619 3529 1.08 R 1065 1575 0.11 Southbound L 212 1719 1.07 T 1635 3564 0.93 R 908 1591 0.10 Intersection Delay = 84.1 0.19 0.31 0.12 0.46 0.68 113.7 F 91.7 F 45.1 D 187.2 F 92.1 F 99.2 F 9.6 A 0.12 156.3 F 0.46 53.6 D 64.4 E 0.57 16.7 B (sec/veh) Intersection .LOS = F HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Year 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATNBI 1/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALLED INTERSECTION SUMMARY f Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound Southbound 1 I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L. T R 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 LGConfig 1 L T R 1 LT R 1 L T R 1 1 L T R Volume 1116 106 136 1263 94 126 1 1 1126 1581 101 -1298 1481 72 f Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 f 0 1 0 1 0 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination. 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A. Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 27.0 8.0 40.0 -Llellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 166 554 0.73 0.30 43.9 D T 543 1810 0.21 0.30 23.7 C 30.6 C R 461 1538 0.31 0.30 24.7 C Westbound LT 374 1245 1.01 0.30 79.4 E 65.1 E R 446 1487 0.30 0.30 24.6 C Northbound L 234 1719 0.57 0.59 21.5 C T 1531 3445 1.09 0.44 75.5 E 68.3 E R 684 1538 0.15 0.44 15.0 B Southbound L 228 1662 1.38 0.59 221.3 F T 1531 3445 1.02, 0.44 52.7 D 78.4 E R 684 1538 0.11 0.44 14.7 B Intersection Delay = 69.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK AM HOUR Year 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMB1 E/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 I Eastbound I L T R I 1 Westbound I L T R 1 Northbound I L T R i Southbound I I L T R No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 1 1 1 I L T R 161 98 145 [12.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 I 0 1 1 # LT R 1151 137 144 I 11.0 11.0 1 0 I 1 2 I L T 11240 12.0 1 1 R 47 12.0 0 I 1 2 1 L T 167 3 1362 11.0 12.0 1 1 R 52 12.0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A 0.30 Thru A C Right A Peds WB Left A 0.30 Thru A C Right A C Peds NB Right SB Right Area Type. All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 I - I NB Left # Thru I Right I Peds [ SB Left I Thru I Right Peds # EB Right J WB Right 5 6 7 AA A A A A A A Green 27.0 8.0 40.0 Iellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Intersection Performance S aryycle Length: 90.0 secs Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 209 698 0.33 0.30 25.3 C T 543 1810 0.20 0.30 23.6 C 24.7 C R 461 1538 0.35 0.30 25.1 C Westbound LT 408 1360 0.78 0.30 38.5 D 34.1 C R 446 1487 0.36 0.30 25.2 C Northbound L 234 1719 0.73 0.59 29.5 C T 1531 3445 0.70 0.44 10.9 B 13.2 B R 684 1538 0.08 0.44 6.8 A Southbound L 302 1662 0.30 0.59 10.2 B T 1531 3445 0.99 0.44 44.9 D 42.0 D R 684 1538 0.08 0.44 14.5 B Intersection Delay = 29.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS w C HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Agency: JCE Date: JUNE 2007 Period: PEAK PM HOUR Project ID: 170PMB1 3/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) Inter,: 'U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWELL RD Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Year : 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES N/S St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound I Northbound Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 { No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 { p 11 I { 1 LGConfig I L T R I LT R { 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 I I L T R I L T R Volume J 1126 174 157 1201 141 178 1267 1748 133 121.6 1540 88 I Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0 112.012.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 30 I 30 1 0 I 0 Duration p_25 Area Type: Ail other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4{ 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A Thru Right A I p, Right A Peds I Peds WB Left I A J SB Left A Thru A Right A p� I Thru A Right Peds 1 Pads NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A { W8 Right A Green 32.0 19.0 21.0 78.0 Cellow 3,0 3:0 3,0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Intersection Performance SummarCycle Length: 170.0 secs y Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 195 1743 0,68 0,11 82.0 F T 205 1835 0.89 0.11 109.7 F 83.9 F R 413 1560 0.32 0.26 50.7 D Westbound LT 336 1784 1.07 0.19 138.4 F 110.2 F R 487 1561 0.32 0.31 45.1 D Northbound L 218 1761 1.29 0,12 227.5 F ?' 1619 3529 1.14 0.46 89.6 F 101.3 F R 1065 1575 0.13 0.68 1.6 A Southbound L 212. 1719 1.07 0.12 156.3 F T 1635 3564 0.99 0.46 65.8 E 74.1 E R 908 1.591 0.10 0.57 16.7 B Intersection Delay = 90.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F I HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD HOPEWEL,L RD Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Year 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ZD: 170SATB1 ;/W St: OLD HOPEWELL ROAD (C.R. 28) NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duration 0.25 Phase Combina EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Fellow All Red on 1 A A A Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound L 152 T 553 R 470 Westbound A A A Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I A 1 L T R I I L T R I L T R J L T R I No. Lanes 1,719 I J 1 I I ] I I 1 1 1 J 0 1 1 J 1 2 J 1 2 LGConfig I L T R I LT R 1 L T R 1 L T R Volume 1116 106 164 1290 94 126, 1154 1678 129 1298 1579 72 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 11.0 11.0 112.0 12.0 12.0.111.0 12.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combina EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Fellow All Red on 1 A A A Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity Eastbound L 152 T 553 R 470 Westbound A A A Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 378 2 3 4 1 5 6 7, 8 I NB Lett A A I Thru A 1 Right A 1 Peds L I SB Left A 1,719 I Thru A Right A I Peds R I EB Right 1538 I WB .Right Southbound 27.5. 8.0 39.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Intersection Performance summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 497 0.80 0.31 1810 0.20 0.31 1538 0.37 0.31 LT 378 1236 1.07 A 454 1487 0.29 Northbound L 234 1,719 0.69 T 1512 3445 1.16 R 675 1538 0.20 Southbound L 228 1662 1.38 T 1512 .3445 1.09 R 675 1538 0.1.1 Intersection Delay = 74.5 0.31 0.31, 0.58 0.44 0.44 54.6 D 23.3 C 24.9 C 33.4 C 97.0 F 79.0 E 24.2 C 26.0 C 86.2 F 75.9 E 3.5 A 0.58 220.7 F 0.44 56.7 E 80.0- E 0.44 3.3 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = E secs HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 Inalysis Time Period: LEAK AM HOUR Intersection: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMEX2 East/West Street: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE RD North/South Street! U.S_ ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street:, Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 1022 19 23 1380 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0:90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1135 21 25 1533 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 T- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided 5 / Percent Grade (P) 56 RT Channelized? v/c 0.00 0 0.25 Flared Approach: Lanes 1 2 0 No / 1 2 0 No / Configuration L T TR 1 0 L T TR 1 Upstream Signal? No F LTR No LTR 184.7 Approach LOS r F Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbqund Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 0 6 10 0 4 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 6 11 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (P) 56 0 v/c 0.00 0 0.25 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 0.01 No / 1.50 No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration F LTR LTR 184.7 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound. Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L LTR LTR v (vph) 1 25 14 15 C(m) (vph) 414 583 56 33 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.25 0.45 95% queue length 0.01 0.13 0.86 1.50 Control Delay 13.7 11.5 89.5 184.7 LOS B B F F Approach Delay 89,5 184.7 Approach LOS r F F HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Agency/Co.: R.H. Date Performed: JCE lnalysis Time `NNE 2007 Intersection; Period: PEAK PM HOUR Jurisdiction.: U-S- RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLE Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: Project ID: 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES East 170PMEX2 /West Street: North/SouthOLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE RD Intersection SOrientati -S. ROUTE 9 NScle Study period (hrs); VehiVo 0'25 Major Street: Approach lames and Adjustments Movement Northbound 1 2S0uthbound L 3 I 4 T R S 6 Volume I L T R Peak-Hour Factor 7 1685 18 HourlyPHF 0.90 0.90 26 1565 17 Flow Rate, HFR 0-90 0.90 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 1872 20 0.90 0.90 Median Type/Storage 5 __ -- 28 1738 18 RT Channelized? Undivided 5 Lanes / Configuration 1 2 Upstream Signal? L T. TR 1 2 0 No L T TR Minor Street; A No t Approach Movement 7 Westbound Eastbound L T 9 I 10 11 R I 12 Volume L T R Peak Hour Factor PHF 14 0 7 Hourly Flo0.90 0.90 2 0 6 Flow Rate, HFR 0.90 Percent Heavy Vehicles 15 0 7 0.90 0'90 0.90 Percent Grade 5 5 2 0 6 Flared Approach: pProach: 5 Exists? 0 5 5 5 Lanes /Storage No 0 Configuration 0 1 0 / No / LTR 0 1 0 LTR Approach Dt?laYr NB Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement SB 1 Westbound Lane Config 4 I 7 $ Eastbound V (vphj L Z I LTR 9 ± 10 11 12 C(m) (vph) 7 2g 22 LTR v/c 340 300 10 8 95$ queue len th 0.02 0.09 30 Delay g Control D0.06 0.31 2.20 LOS Y 15.8 18.2 3.72 0.27 � 1290 0.89 APProa6h Delay C F 164.0 Approach LOS 1290 F F 164.0 F HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 analysis Time Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Intersection: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLE Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATEX2 East/West Street: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE RD North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 6 1551 8 0.90 0.90 0.90 6 1723 8 5 - - -- Undivided 1 2 0 L T TR No 10 1610 15 0.90 0.90 0.90 11 1788 16 5 -- -- 1 2 0 L T TR No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 4 0 12 6 0 8. Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 0 13 6 0 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) F 0 Approach Delay 0 161.2 Flared Approach: 8xists?/Storage No / F No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR v (vph) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach N5 SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR I LTR v (vph) 6 11 17 14 C(m) (vph) 325 348 38 20 v/c 0.02 0.03 0.45 0.70 95% queue length 0.06 0.10 1.53 1.95 Control Delay 16.3 15.7 161.2 365.0 LOS C C F F Approach Delay 161.2 365.0 Approach LOS F F HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 Analysis Time Period: PEAK AM HOUR Intersection: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMNB2 East/West Street: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE RD North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement .1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1 1114 21 25 1504 7 ,Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 1237 23 27 1671 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided Approach Delay / 139.9 Flared Approach: RT Channelized? No / F No / Lanes Lanes 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 Configuration Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 9 0 7 11 0 4 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 10 0 7 12 0 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) F 0 Approach Delay 0 139.9 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / F No / Lanes 0 1 © 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR v (vph) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L j LTR LTR v (vph) 1 27 17 16 C(m) (vph) 365 532 42 22 v/c 0.00 0.05 0.40 0.73 95% queue length 0.01 0.16 1.41 2.10 Control Delay 14.9 12.1 139.9 346.7 LOS B B F F Approach Delay 139.9 346.7 kpproach LOS F F HCS-: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co JCE Date Performed: FEBRUARY 2007 .analysis Time Period: PEAK PM HOUR Intersection: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLE Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMNB2 East/West Street: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE RD North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound . Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 8 1863 20 28 1706 19 Peak --Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Elate, HER 8 2070 22 31 1895 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided 5 / F 0 RT Channelized? 0 2519 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 2 0 / 1 2 0 Lanes Configuration L T TR 0 L T TR 0 Upstream Signal? No LTR No LTR Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 15 0 8 2 0 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 0 8 2 0 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) F 0 Approach Delay 0 2519 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No / F No / Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR v (vph) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 j 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L L l LTR LTR v (vph) 8 31 24 9 C(m) (vph) 294 250 6 17 v/c 0.03 0.12 4.00 0.53 95% queue length 0..08 0.42 4.33 1.40 Control Delay 17.6 21.4 2519 359.2 LOS C C F F Approach Delay 2519 359.2 Approach LOS F F HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: FEBRUARY 2007 ( knalysis Time Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Intersection: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATNB2 East/West Street: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE RD North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R t L T R Volume 7 1691 9 11 1755 16 peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate,.HFR 7 1678 10 12 1950 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided No / F No / RT Channelized? 0 0 1 0 LTR Lanes 1 2 0 LTR 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 4 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 Percent Grade (%) Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 0 Configuration 0 13 7 0 9 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 14 7 0 10 5. 5 5 5 5 0 18.2 17.5 0 846.0 LOS No / F No / 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR F v (vph) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Contig L L LTR LTR v (vph) 7 12 18 17 C(m) (vph) 280 301 25 12 v/c 0.03 0.04 0.72 1.42 95% queue length 0.08 0.12 2.20 2.86 Control Delay 18.2 17.5 311.0 846.0 LOS C C F F Approach Delay 311.0 846.0 Approach LOS F F HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLS Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAR ANI HOUR Year 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMB2 /W St: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE ROAD NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Duration 0.25 I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I C L T R I 1 L T R I 1 L T I R I L T R I I I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 ( 1 2 0 1 LGConfig I LTR 1 LT R 1 L T R 1 L TR Volume I11 2 4 161 2 43 11 1144 73 192 1504 7 } Lane Width I 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 -12.0 111.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas 0.26 25.3 C 25.3 Signal Operations Westbound Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A I Thru C A Right A 1 Right 25.9 A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru 0.63 A Right A 1 Right T 1761 A Peds 0.51 1 Peds B 18.1 NB Right R 786 1 EB Right 0.10 0.51 SB Right B 1 WB Right Southbound Green 23.0 6.0 46.0 ''ellow 3.0 L 218 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 B 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 391 1530 0.05 0.26 25.3 C 25.3 C Westbound LT 343 1344 0.20 0.26 26,6 C 26.3 C R 393 1538 0.12 0.26 25.9 C Northbound L 195 1719 0.01 0.63 13.1 B T 1761 3445 0.72 0.51 18.5 B 18.1 B R 786 1538 0.10 0.51 11.4 B Southbound L 218 1662 0.47 0..63 12.7 B TR 1760 3443 0.95 0.51 18.7 B 18.4 B Intersection Delay = 18.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = S secs HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R..H. zntet.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLS Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK PM HOUR Year 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMB2 f 'VWSt: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE ROAD NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I No. Lanes 1 0 I I I I I 0 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 I 1 0 LGConfig LTR I LT R I L T R I L TR I Volume 12 6 7 1177 6 125 I8 1825 171 1222 1657 19 Lane Width I 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 1 0 j 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal operations _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right. A Peds I Peds WB Left A l 5B Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 16.5 10.0 48.5 r 'ellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90,0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS -- - - - Eastbound LTR 300 1639 0.05 0.18 30.4 C 30.4 C Westbound LT 240 1307 0.80 0.18 52.5 D 45.0 D R 282 1538 0.47 0.18 34.1 C Northbound L 271 1719 0.03 0.71 10.2 B T 1856 3445 1.04 0,54 51.8 D 47.7 D R 829 1538 0.22 0.54 11.0 B Southbound L 265 1662 0.88 0.71 45.0 D TR 1853 3439 0.95 0.54 15.9 B 19.3 B Intersection Delay = 34.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS+: Signalized Intersections Release 5.2 Analyst: R.H. Inter.: U.S. RTE 9 & OLD POST RD/FOWLE Agency: JCE Area Type: All other areas Date: JUNE 2007 Jurisd: Period: PEAK SAT HOUR. Year 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATB2 E/W St: OLD POST RD/FOWLER HOUSE ROAD NIS St: U.S. ROUTE 9 Eastbound { L T R I No. Lanes 1 0 1 0 LGConfig l LTR Volume 17 7 9 Lane Width 1 1.2.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound { Northbound ! Southbound I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I i ! { 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 l LT R 1 L T R I L TR 1175 7 136 17 1651 168 1215 1704 16 1 1.2.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas _ Signal Operations Phase Combination l 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NBLeft A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A { Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A ( Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right { EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right. Green 17.0 10,0 48.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LTR 295 1561 0.08 0.19 30.2 C 30.2 C Westbound LT .245 1298 0.78 0.19 49.6 D 42.9 D R 291 1538 0.49 0.19 33.9 C Northbound L 272 1719 0.03 0.70 15.1 B T 1.837 3445 0.95 0.53 30.7 C 28.8 C R 820 1538 0.22 0.53 11.2 B Southbound L 265 1662 0.85 0.70 48.1 D TR 1835 3440 0.99 0.53 22.9 C 25.7 C Intersection Delay = 28.4 (sec/veh) Intersection, LOS = C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R. H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 I analysis Time.Period: PEAK AM HOUR Intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMEX3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South Street; U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 G 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1042 1218 174 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR- 1157 1353 193 Percent Heavy Vehicles --. Approach LOS C Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate,.HFR 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR _ Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I LR v. (vph) 2 C (m) (vph) 335 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay 25.8 LOS C Approach Delay 15.8 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 Analysis Time Period: PEAK PM HOUR Intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMEX3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1710 1335 250 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1900 1483 277 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%') 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 2 0.90 0.90 0 2 5 5 0 / No 0 0 LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 LR 2 284 0,01 0.02 17.8 C 17.8 C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R. H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2001 ?analysis Time Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Intersection: U -S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID; 170SATEX3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1565 1446 174 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1738 1608 193 Percent Heavy Vehicles 18..8 Approach LOS C Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration 'T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 14 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LR v (vph) 15 C (m) (vph) 276 v/c 0.05 95% queue length 0.17 Control Delay 18.8 LOS C Approach Delay 18..8 Approach LOS C .HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co:: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 knalysis Time Period: PEAK AM HOUR Intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U_ S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 NO --BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMNB3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 j 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1136 1328 190 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1262 1475 211 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TP, Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound. Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume - T 0 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HER 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach:. Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 E 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config j k LR v (vph) 2 C(m) (vph) 301 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay 17.0 LOS C Approach Delay 17,0 Approach LOS { C HCS{-: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO --WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 analysis Time Period: PEAK PM HOUR Intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMNB3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South.Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Movement 1 L Northbound 2 3 T R Southbound 1 4 5 I L T 6 R Volume 1890 1455 273 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2100 1616 303 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 Configuration T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 S 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 2. Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 .0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 10 Lane Config I I v kvpn). C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Eastbound 11 LR 2 251 0.01 0.02 19.5 C 19.5 C 12 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 i, analysis Time Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 NO -BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATNB3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/ South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 1706 0.90 1895 Undivided 2 T No 1578 190 0.90 0.90 1753 211 2 0 T TR No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 0 15 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 j 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I LR v (vph) 16 C(m) (vph) 243 v/c 0.07 95% queue length 0.21 Control Delay 20.9 LOS C Approach Delay 20.9 Approach LOS C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 Analysis Time Period: PEAK AM HOUR intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMB3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and. Adjustments Major Street:. Approach Northbqund Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R { L T R Volume 1184 1376 190 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1315 1528 211 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Meehan Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 0 T TR Configuration T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2 Percent Heavy.Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 955 queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 7 $ 9 10 11 12 LR 2 289 0.01 0.02 17.5 C 17.5 C HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: J'CE Date Performed: 3UNE 2007 analysis Time Period: PEAK PM HOUR intersection: U.S. ROUTE 9 & OSBORNE HILL RD Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMB3 East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. 35) North/South Street; U.S. ROUTE 9 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0.25 Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R L T' R Volume 1995 1560 0.90 273 0.90 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 1733 303 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2216 Percent Leavy Vehicles -- -- / Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? 2 0 Lanes 2 T T TR Configuration Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 ( 10 11 12 L T R LT R Volume. 0 L Peals Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / No / Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 9 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 } 7 8 9 10 11 } LR 2 230 0.01 0.03 20.8 C 20.8 C 12 HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO -WAX STOP CONTROL SUMMARY_r Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 analysis Time Period: PEAK SATHOURE 9 & OSB HILL RD Intersection: Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Analysis Year: Project ID: 170SATB3 35) East/West Street: OSBORNE HILL ROAD (C.R. North/South Street: U.S. ROUTE 9 Study period (hrs): 0.25 Intersection Orientation: NS Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Southbound Major Street: Approach Northbound 3 I 4 5 6 Movement 1 2 R I L T R L T 1817 1690 190 Volume0.90 0.90 0.90 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 2018 1877 211 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Undivided / Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? 2 2 0 Lanes T T TR Configuration No Upstream Signal? No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound 10 11 12 Movement 7 8 9 I I L T R L T 0 l5 Volume 0.90 0.90 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 16 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) / No / Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage 0 0 Lanes LR Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of ServiceEastbound Approach NB SB Westbound 8 9 10 11 12 I Movement � 9 17 I LR Lane Config I 16 v (vph) 221 C (m) (vph) 0.07 v/c 0.23 95% queue length 22.6 Control Delay C LOS 22.6 Approach Delay C Approach LOS HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. 101 33 1469 898 Agency/Co.: JCE 0.00 0.11 0.03 0.00 Date Performed: JUNE 2007 7.5 9.5 8.8 { Inalysis Time Period: PEAK AM HOUR A 9.3 Intersection: OLD POST ROAD & SITE ACCESS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMB4 East/West Street: SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY (NORTH) North/South Street: OLD POST ROAD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: approach Northbound southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 46 48 0 15 " Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 .0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 51 53 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles - -- 5 - -- Median 'Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 91 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 101 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?./Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB S3 Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 j 7 8 9 l 10 11 12 Lane Config LT L R J v (vph) C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0 101 33 1469 898 974 0.00 0.11 0.03 0.00 0.38 0.11 7.5 9.5 8.8 A A A 9.3 A HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H_ Agency/Co.: UCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 -'nalysis Time Period: PEAK PM HOUR Intersection: OLD POST ROAD & SITE ACCESS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project. ID: 170PMB4 East/West Street: SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY (NORTH) North/South Street: OLD POST ROAD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle.Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T . R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 48 140 0 23 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 53 155 0 25 -- -- 5 Undivided / 1 0 0 1 TR LT No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 '. L T R I L T R Volume 285 66 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 316 73 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage f / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Approach Movement Lane Config v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and. Level of Service NB SB Westbound Eastbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 LT I L R 0 316 73 1345 829 912 0.00 0.38 0.08 0.00 1.80 0.26 7.7 12.0 9.3 A B A 11.5 B HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 Analysis Time Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Intersection: OLD POST ROAD & SITE ACCESS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATB4 East/West Street: SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY (NORTH) North/South Street: OLD POST ROAD Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound. Southbound Movement 1 2 3 ( 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 20 148 0 17 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 22 164 0 is -- -- 5 -- Undivided / 1 0 0 1 TR LT No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 301 70 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 334 77 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 Percent Grade (W) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 ( 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 L R v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Q 334 77 1371 866 943 0.00 0.39 0.08 0.00 1.83 0.27 7.6 11.7 9.2 A B A 11.3 B HCSt: Unsignalized Intersections Release ,).L TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 ' Analysis Time Period: PEAK AM HOUR Intersection: OLD POST ROAD & SITE ACCESS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170AMB5 East/West Street: OLD POST ROAD North/South Street: SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY (SOUTH) 0.25 Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street:. Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R L T R Volume Peak -Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Conf igurat�on Upstream Signal? Minor Street: Approach Movement 94 73 0.90 0.90 104 81 Undivided 1 0 TR No Northbound 7 8 9 L T R Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate,,.HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration 0 106 0.90 0.90 0 117 5 -- - 0 1 LT No Southbound 10 11 12 I L T R II U I Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT v (vph) 0 C(m) (vph) 1372 v/c 0.40 95% queue length 0.00 Control Delay 7.6 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS l HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H_ Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 ( analysis Time Period: PEAK PM HOUR Intersection: OLD POST ROAD & SITE ACCESS Jurisdiction: Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170PMB5 East/West Street: OLD POST ROAD North/South Street: SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY (SOUTH) 0.. 25 intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6. L T R L T R Volume Peale -Dour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HER Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Upstream Signal? 188 211 0 308 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 206 234 0 342 -- -- 5 Undivided / 1 0 0 1 TR LT No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbqund Movement 7 8 9 j 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HER Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade M 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT v (vph) 0 C(m) (vph) 1102 v/c 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 Control Delay 8.3 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS i HCS+: Unsignalized Intersections Release 5.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: R.H. Agency/Co.: JCE Date Performed: JUNE 2007 Analysis Time Period: PEAK SAT HOUR Intersection: OLD POST ROAD & SITE ACCESS Jurisdiction: units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Project ID: 170SATB5 East/West Street: OLD POST ROAD North/South Street: SITE ACCESS DRIVEWAY (SOU'G'H) Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs). 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and -Adjustments or Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 j 4 5 6 . L T R I L T R Volume 168 222 0 318 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 186 246 0 353 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 5 Median Type/Storage Undivided / RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 j 10 11 12 L T R j L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB W$ Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 f 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT V (vph) 0 C(m) (vph) 11.12 v/c 0.00 95% queue length 0.00 Control Delay 8.2. LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS APPENDIX Il D ll STANDARDS LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service (LOS) for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, geometrics, traffic, and incidents. Specifically, LOS criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle, typically for a 15 -- minute analysis period. The criteria are given in Exhibit 16-2 from the 2000 Highway. Capacity Manual published by. the Transportation Research Board. EXHIBIT 16-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS -1- CONTROL DELAY LEVEL OF SERVICE PER VEHICLE (LOS) (S/VEH) A 5]0 B >10-20 C >20-35 D >35--55 E >55-80 F >80 -1- LEVEL OF SERVICE A describes operations with low.controi delay, up I to 10 seconds per vehicle (s/veh). This LOS occurs when progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Many vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may tend to contribute to low delay values. LEVEL OF SERVICE B describes operations with control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per vehicle (s/veh). This level generally occurs with good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than with Level of Service "A", causing higher levels of delay. .LEVEL OF SERVICE C describes operations with control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle (s/veh). These higher delays may result from only fair progression•, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. LEVET, OF SERVICE D. describes operations with control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per vehicle (s/veh). At Level of Service D. the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping f declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. -2- LEVEL OF SERVICE E describes operations with control delay greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per vehicle (s/veh). This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high v/c ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent. LEVEL OF SERVICE F describes operations with control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle (s/veh). This level is considered unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with oversaturation,. that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the groups. It may also occur at high v/c ratios with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute significantly to high delay levels. -3- LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The. Level of Service (LOS) for unsignalized intersections is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Control delay is defined as the total elapsed time a vehicle stops at the end of the queue to the time. the vehicle departs from the stop line. This total elapsed time includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last - 'in -queue position to the first -in -queue position, including deceleration of vehicles from free-flow speed to speed of vehicles in queue. Average control delay for any particular minor movement is a function of the capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. The Level .of Service Criteria are given in Exhibit 17-2 from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board. EXHIBIT 17-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The Level of Service Criteria for unsignalized intersections are f somewhat different from the criteria for signalized intersections. -4- AVERAGE LEVEL OF SERVICE CONTROL DELAY (LOS) (S%VEH) A 0-10 B >10-15 C >15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F >50 The Level of Service Criteria for unsignalized intersections are f somewhat different from the criteria for signalized intersections. -4- w w � rn U 00 4 o n, � `u U W l �L L Phone 845-473-0200 Fax845-473-0267 Response to Public Hearing Comments Adams Fair Acre Farms Town of Wappinger, New York The following are responses to the public hearing comments on the Adams Fairacre Farms Site Plan Review on September 3, 2008. This information has been gathered organized regarding the topics to be addressed. TRAFFIC: Commentators: Mr. Rick Lamos, 17 MacFarlane Road Mr. Walter Lazenka, 29 MacFarlane Road Mr. Ed Pisarek, 9 Beechwood Circle Sabina Ruh 8 MacFarlane Road, Daughter - Ms. Christine Unger Mr. David Glickman, 21 MacFarlane Road Mrs. Connie Oliveri, Old Hopewell Road Issues & Responses: (Q) Was there any consideration made at all to MacFarlane Road? Currently the Road is used as a pass through to avoid the intersection of Old Hopewell Road and Route 9. (A) - The road is currently used by local residents destined for White Gates and the Pavilion Condominium complexes. This will continue. - Additional traffic currently occurs on the road during commuter rush hour traffic destined to the east on Old Hopewell Road. This will continue. - The road is used as an alternate path by commuters to travel between Route 9 and Old Hopewell Road. This will continue. - Travel distance between these points is 1, 500 feet shorter using MacFarlane Road. - Traffic signage has a posted speed limit of 30 mph with cautionary signs of 15 mph & 25 mph in areas of horizontal and vertical curves. (Q) During the rush hour period, currently traffic backs up to MacFarlane, what will happen with a new light? (A) - Interconnection and coordination of the signalization at Old Post Road & and Old Hopewell Road to minimize additional queuing and delays on Route 9. - The signalization will not reduce the amount of `cut -through' traffic utilizing MacFarlane during PM peak hours. (Q) How will this Project affect the drainage and flooding coming across Route 9? (A) -There will be minimal effect of stormwater runoff from Route 9. Stormwater both the site and the improvement along Route 9,.flows to the north or to the south along Route 9. - The stormwater is transported through an existing pipe across Route 9 which exits to a Swale behind houses on South Fowlerhouse Road. - Stormwater from the site will not impact Fowlerhouse Road. - On-site stormwater detention systems will meet or decrease the stormwater runoff rate to those ofpre-development conditions. BLASTING: Commentators: Mr. Neil Fick, 3 Beechwood Circle, Ms. Peiffer, 4 Fowlerhouse Road Issues & Responses: (Q) Will there be Blasting? (A) Isolated blasting may occur as part of initial site construction activities. All blasting must be performed in strict conformance with the Town of Wappinger code related to blasting. Prior to any blasting, the Client will attempt to remove the existing rock through a method identified as `ripping' if commercially reasonable. (Q) How does it work when you start blasting, is there certain hours and what about the noise? (A) As stated by the Building Inspector for the Town of Wappinger, any blasting on the site it will be performed following the Town of Wappinger Code chapter 80: Blasting. - Section 80-12 of the Town of Wappinger Code entitled "Hours for Blasting": "Blasting may be conducted when authorized by permit Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:30 am and 3: 00 pm. Blasting is prohibited Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, except upon the written approval of the Fire Inspector, the Town Engineer, or any consulting engineer responsible for specific Town projects. " DOMESTIC WATER WELLS: Commentators: Mr, Rick Lamos, 17 MacFarlane Road Mr. David Glickman, 21 MacFarlane Road Sabina Ruh 8 MacFarlane Road, Daughter Ms. Christine Unger Issues & Responses: (Q) Will any of the existing wells be used by the Adams Project? (A) - Upon completion of construction, no existing on-site wells will be utilized as part of the Adams Fairacre Farm project. - Central Water service will be provided by the Town of Wappinger. - Existing wells will be capped, abandoned or removed entirely in accordance with the strict guidelines as per the Dutchess County Department of Health or as required by the governing codes for the State of New York. (Q) Will Adams have a PA system? (A) Adams does not use a P.A, System for inter property communications, (Q) What will be the hours of deliveries? (A) - Deliveries are limited to the hours of 6 a, m. to 7 p.m. - A barrier gate is to be placed on the north side of `the building in the access drive leading to the rear service areas limiting access of delivery trucks which may arrive outside of'this delivery window. The trucks would need to wait on the west side of the building till this gate is unlocked allowing access to the service area. (Q) What chemicals will be used to de-ice the sidewalks and pavement from the snow and ice? (A) Liquid Magic -0 or an equivalent equal product will he used for de-icing the parking lot when icy conditions exist. This is a biodegradable and non -corrosive product that is safe around plants, people and equipment. It is both EPA and NYSDOT approved. (Q) We want some assurances that they will take care of their land. (A) Adams Fairacre Farms has a Property Management Crew that is responsible for the continual upkeep of the public as well as service areas of'the Adams Properties. (Q) Will adjoining properties get affects from the site lighting from the Adams Project just like from Acura? (A) - Lighting of the parking lots, the building and select areas of the nursery are limited to the hours from dust to 9:30p.m./10: 00 p.m. - Select light fixtures that will remain on throughout the night for security purposes, - The lighting fixtures are cut-off fixtures which throw light downward rather then outward causing glare and shall be furnished with shields to direct the light away from the adjoining properties. - The Photometric Layout of the fixtures has been designed to meet the Town standard off zero foot-candles at the property line adjoining residential districts. (Q) An attempt to be environmentally sensitive has been observed, but there needs to be assurances and would like to see a plan. (A) The Adams Project is looking to address environmentally sensitive issues as deemed economically and physically possible, As the building is further developed, the manner in which environmental issues have been addressed will be evident. Page 2 additional 201 vehicles utilizing this roadway which provides a connection between the State and County route. Comment 2. Mr. Walter Lazenka, 29 MacFarlane Road. The commentator was concerned with queues on Route 9 and the potential for additional bypass traffic on MacFarlane Road. Response 2. See response above. Comment 3. Mr. Ed Pisarek, 9 Beechwood Circle. Why not make MacFarlane Road one-way for a distance? Response 3. Any change to MacFarlane Road, such as changing a portion of it to a one-way section, would have to be approved by the Town. Changing aportion of MacFarlane Road to one-way would also require MacFarlane Road residents in that area to change their traffic patterns and would have to be considered. The traffic improvements on Route 9 being completed as part ofthe project should minimize the amount of "cut through" traffic utilizing this roadway. Comment 4. Ms. Christine Unger, 8 MacFarlane Road. (Speaking on behalf of her mother) The commentator is concerned about the traffic flow at the end of MacFarlane Road closest to Route 9 and the potential increase in "cut through" traffic. Response 4. Relative to traffic }low from MacFarlane Road on and off of Route 9, no specific changes have been identified in association with the Adam's project, However, it should be noted that for traffic exiting MacFarlane Road and making a left turn onto Route 9 southbound is currently difficult during peak periods. Residents will now have the option to proceed north to the new traffic light at Adam's and under a protected signal phase and a left turn storage lane, be able to make a U-turn to head southbound. This would bean alternate path for use during peak periods. During off-peak periods, the presence of the traffic signal is expected to create some JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. n,mc•TRANSPORTAMNENGINFFRS 11 BRADHURST AVENUE • HAWTHORNE, NX, • 10532 • (914) 347-7500 • FAX (914) 347-7266 September 23, 2008 J# 170 Additional Response to Comments Adam's Fair Acre Farms Town of Wappinger, New York Additional Responses to Comments from Mr. Walter Lazenka, Response 1. There is a significant amount oftraffic utilizing MacFarlane Road between Route 9 and Old Hopewell Road. In the afternoon peak hours, vehicles destined to the east on Old Hopewell Road travel this way since it is significantly shorter distance regardless of the signal on Route 9 and Old Hopewell Road. The new traffic signal at the Old Past Road/Adam's/Route 9 intersection has been designed to minimize the amount of green time for the side roads giving the higher priority to through traffic on Route 9. As part of our improvements, we are also providing the coordination equipment for this to be interconnected with the Route 9/01d Hopewell Road signal which will still control the operation along Route 9. We do not anticipate a major increase in traffic utilizing MacFarlane Road other than people destined to and from Old Hopewell Road east of MacFarIane Road. .In any event, we will continue to work with the Town on additional signing and striping improvements. Response 2. During the peak afternoon periods, the northbound traffic queues on Route 9 occasionally extends past the Old Post Road intersection. The proposed signal coordination should limit the increase in queues on Route 9 northbound which will still be governed by the operation of the Route 9/01d Hopewell Road intersection, The proposed signal upgrades will also include optimized signal timings to reduce queues along the corridor. The signal timing will also be coordinated with the signal located to the south at Route 9 and Smithtown Road in the vicinity of the Plant Depot. U) uj w � m ti 0 0. g o ro m V o U �':Ql STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION EIGHT 4 BURNETT BOULEVARD POUGHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK 12608 www.nysdotgov JOAN DUPONT, RE_ REGIONAL DIRECTOR April 21, 2008 Mr. Philip Grealy John Collins Engineers 11 Bradhurst Avenue, Hawthorne, NY 10532 ASTRID C. GLYNN COMMISSIONER Re: SEAR 07-0078 Aflame Falmere Farms Route 9 Dear Mr. Grealy: The Department has completed its review of the Traffic Impact Study dated August 28. 2008 and grants conceptually approval for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 9 and Old Post Road. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (845) 575-6040. Very truly yours, Richard Dillmann, P.E. Regional Traffic and Safety Engineer cc; G. Walsh, Permit Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineering and Safety, Region 8 A. DeNigro, Permit Inspector, Residency 8-3 Philip J. DiNonno, Chairman, Town of Wappinger Planning Board Uy 0)N ODCOCO NLo C14foNrD N o0 N O 04 0 G c0 C 00 In;P'? ti D r O N O 0 O) 0 M m iS7 (O 0 N tC) w U' NNO O -N(]CQOcOri� C QI U D T Q D <- N N O T T N N O r Enmmmmm �rn�m�m � W Q Q 0 O E Z Z O o 0 Q o x 0 0 0 0 O O O b 0 _ Cl O Co O O 0 0 0 0 0 N O .Zr 0 0 0 -d - co w ti d N C: C N M -t M LO 0 O N N O M D o T ti ccr r m d m r Y r. N. r Z CT = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0> L o o 00 CD C) 0 0 0 QO 000 Z M CO 0 0 m MN(� W yLo(OmMN >tnr-Qm C r- 0 HO cq M O N N y O Z r N N N N O O d IL O O Q O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O O O O O Q L 0) 0 0 0 Q N I� u7 N to 00 N (O C)M N ti +• tf) I— O m N Lo O N co T lmMN N m CO C14C.4 L- - N N N LO c �t N y N � a a cDc0 r- (D o C) m ti 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N co/N Co OY T O IJ Q Q r r O V) C� lJ M (0 Cf) M cCOa) Cl) W T w r 0 co CO I- ti co o 0 (O r� t - 0 0 0 0 CL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t6 N N N N N w N_ N N N (_V a Y r C T O CD ti 0 r d' C C C W m co Adams Fairacre Farms MA PROJECT NUMBER: 206111 U# 2007 August Revised: January 2088 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, PLLC 9 Elks Lane, Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Tel: (845) 454-3411 Fax: (845� 473-1962: 44 W 187 Church Street, Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Tel: (845) 471-7900 Fax: (845) 471-7901 11101111 389 Fairview Avenue, Hudson, New York 12534 Tel:(518)828.23oo Fax:(518)828-3963 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 1.1 PROPOSED PROJECT..............................................................................................1 1.2 QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF ANALYSIS.................................................................2 1.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES........................................................2 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................................3 2.1 GENERAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS.......................................................................3 2.2 SOILS .................................................. ......................................................................3 2.3 PRE -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS..........................................................4 3. PROPOSED CONDITIONS.................................................................................................... 6 3.1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT....................................................................................6 3.2 POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS........................................................6 4. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS.................................................................8 4.1 UNIFIED SIZING CRITERIA ............................. ..................................................... 8 4.1.3 Water Quality Volume..................................................................................8 4.1.4 Stream Channel Protection..........................................................................9 4.1.5 Overbank Flood Protection.........................................................................10 4.1.5 Extreme Flood Protection........................................................................ ... 4.2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES....................................................•...11 4.4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MAINTENANCE...............................14 ' 4.5 POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES................................................................16 5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL..............................................................................17 6. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE............................................................................................17 7. CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................17 Page 2 of 2 LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES Table 2-1. On-site Soils........................... ••-•••.••-.-••••••-.•..••. ............................... . Table 2-2. Existing Conditions - Peak Flows ...................................................... 7 Table 3-1. Proposed Conditions -Peak Flows .................. ........................... ............ Table 4-3. Water Quality Volume ......................................... Table 4-4. .................................................• Stream Channel Protection................................................................ 10 Table 4-5. Overbank Flood Protection •••••..••1••1•••...................... ....... ............ 10 Table 4-6. ......................................... Extreme Flood Protection ................................... ............. APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Existing (Undeveloped) Conditions • HydroCAD Output APPENDIX B - Proposed (Developed) Conditions • HydroCAD Output APPENDIX C • Unified Sizing Criteria Calculations • WQ Flow Calculations • CDS & Contech Sizing Caiculations • E&S Sizing Calculations APPENDIX D • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans • Existing Drainage Plan (Sheet 1 of 2) - Inset in back • Proposed Drainage Plan (Sheet 2 of 2) - Inset in back APPENDIX E • CDS &CONTECH Maintenance Specifications • SMP 1 Pond Maintenance Checklist ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS September 22, 2008 SWPPP 1. INTRODUCTION This report has been developed to meet NYSDEC SPDES Phase II requirements as well as those provided by the Town of Wappinger in regards to stormwater management. This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is to be used as a design tool and guide for the property owner, client, and developer for the development and maintenance of the project site described in detail below. This plan proposes to utilize a combination or conventional and proprietary pre -manufactured stormwater management practices to provide water quality and quantity control. An extensive "treatment train of bioretention, hydrodynamic separation, settling through detention and filtration are proposed to reduce the concentration of pollutants to the maximum extent practical for portions of the site. Due to site constraints and the scale of the proposed development, construction activities will likely require the disturbance of an area greater than 5 acres at any one time. It is anticipated the construction of retaining wails, movement of earth, and development of the building pad will require an area of 9.7 acres to be disturbed. The utilization of these practices and the proposed disturbance of 9.7 acres will require specific approval by the Town of Wappinger. 1.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is located along the east side of NYS Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, NY. The project area is approximately 12.71 acres encompassed on parcel grid identification numbers 135689-6157-04-649335, 135689- 6157-04-614375 and 135689-6157-04-649374. The current parcels are to be developed by Adams Fairacre Farms, i ne proposed development includes the construction of a commercial building, greenhouse, outdoor storage facilities for landscaping products, access roadways, parking, and associated utility installation. The development will include drainage improvements, areas of wetland disturbance and mitigation due to the disturbance of the onsite wetlands. The parcel will be serviced by municipal water and sewer. Re -grading of the land will occur throughout the project site to promote drainage and provide for acceptable building grades, parking lot grades, roadways, storage space, and stormwater management features. Drainage structures will be installed ( beneath the proposed parking lot and access road systems with catch basins installed throughout to direct runoff towards designated stormwater management areas. Page 1 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS September 22, 2008. SWPPP 1.2 QUANTITATIVE METHOD OF ANALYSIS This analysis utilizes the methods stated in Technical Release No. 55 (TR -55), Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. A Type III Dutchess County rainfall distribution was used to generate tabular hydrographs for the 1, 10, 25 and 100 -year storm events, with respective 24-hour rainfall depths of 2.8, 5.0, 6.0 and 8.0 inches. Insignificant travel time through the proposed parking lot collection system have been ignored for ease of calculation and to conservatively predict higher peak flows prior to attenuation. Tabular hydrographs were routed using HydroCAD, Version 8.0 to model the attenuation characteristics of the proposed stormwater management practices. This computer aided design (CAD) program was developed by HydroCAD Software Solutions, LLC and simulates the USDA Soil Conservation Service's TR -20 hydrologic and hydraulic model to analyze the routing of stormwater runoff. The New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual was used to determine unified stormwater sizing criteria and performance criteria in the selection of stormwater management practices. Sediment and Erosion Control practices have been selected using the New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control. The site plan in conjunction with additional offsite survey data areas and United select Geological Survey data was used to delineate the oveates rall watershed design points. The soil types were delineated as per the Dutchess County Soil Survey. 1.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES The introduction of impervious surfaces due to urban development decreases natural infiltration and quickly accumulates pollutants deposited from the atmosphere, leaked from vehicles, or windblown from adjacent areas. During storm events, these pollutants quickly wash off, and are rapidly delivered to downstream waters. As a result, both the frequency and magnitude of storm flows increase dramatically ultimately increasing erosion and enlargement of stream channels, and consequent habitat degradation. It is the objective of this report to preliminarily identify the means proposed to minimize erosion and sediment problems on and Cogservation pollptant removal as meet New York State Department of Environmental goals, reduce channel erosion, prevent overbank flooding, and help control extreme floods. Page 2 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 GENERAL SITE CHARACTERISTICS September 22, 2008 The existing site consists mainly of wooded areas, and existing residential yards and homes with minor amounts of open space in relatively good conditions. A portion of the project site, consists of NWI wetlands. The majority of the slopes onsite range from 0-15% to approximately 50% in some isolated locations. Runoff from the largest portion of the site to be developed generally flows in a south westerly direction before entering one of two (2) federal wetlands and discharging offsite via a drainage channel. Smaller portions of the site drain to the northeast and northwest discharging either to the onsite wetlands or offsite via a drainage ditch along the existing road and NYS Route 9. 2.2 SOILS Based on a review of the USDA Soil Survey of Ulster County, New York, soils on the project site consist primarily solely of loamy soils. The following information describes the characteristics of the on-site soils: The portion of the site to be developed consists solely of Dutchess-Cardigan Complex (DwB) soil type. The following information includes soil type descriptions for soils found directly on the site and within the contributing offsite drainage areas; DwB Dutchess — Cardigan complex, undulating, rocky (1 to 6 percent slopes) — This complex is about 40 percent Dutchess soils, 30 percent Cardigan soils, and 30 percent other soils and rock outcrop. Folded shale rock outcrop covers 0.1 to 2 percent of the surface. Dutchess soils — Very deep, well drained loamy soils formed in till. Permeability is moderate. Cardigan soils — Moderately deep (20 to40 inches), well drained loamy soils formed in till underlain by folded shale bedrock. Permeability is moderate. Page 3 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 �Dutchess- Moderately 100.0 Cardigan DwC B 1-6% drained loam Complex Table 2-1. On-site Soils The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service assigns each soil series to a hydrologic soil group (HSG). The HSG is a four letter index (A -D) that is intended to show the relative potential for a soil to generate runoff. The project site is comprised solely of HSG B soil. HSG B soil has a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. 2.3 PRE -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS For the pre -development analysis, the stormwater runoff characteristics where considered at four (4) design points. Portions of each watershed drain offsite areas and flow towards the design points or points of interest. Design points may be a point where concentrated runoff in a stream or swale leaves the property or just indication of the general direction of overland flow across the property line or through a significant land feature. A brief overview of the design points and contributing drainage areas are described below. Design Point 1, (DP1), is located at the outlet of a jurisdictional wetland within the development which lies at the southwestern boundary of the project site. Runoff from the area generally flows in a southwesterly direction from a highpoint contained within the site and highpoints offsite downgrade into the existing onsite wetlands and discharging to offsite via an existing drainage channel. Design Point 2, (DP2), is located along the eastern side of the northbound lane of NYS Route 9 at the entrance to an existing 12" diameter CMP culvert. Runoff from the area generally flows in a southwesterly direction from a highpoint contained within the site downgrade through woods, open space and impervious area before entering the existing grassed swale along the eastern edge of NYS Route 9 and ultimately to the existing 12" diameter CMP. Page 4 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 Design Point 3, (DP3), is located at the northwestern property boundary where a small roadside ditch exists along Old Route 9. The upstream contributing watershed varies in cover type from woods in good condition, open space in good condition, and a minor amount of impervious area. It is this watershed, Drainage Area 3 (DA3) that drains the northwestern portion of the site. Runoff from the area generally flows in a northerly direction from a highpoint onsite downgrade through woods, and lawn before entering the roadside ditch along Old Route 9 Design Point 4 (DP4) is located offsite in a small swale running north along the eastern shoulder of RT9 approximately 415 feet from the intersection with Old Route 9. The contributing includes open space in good condition, and the impervious paving of Route 9. Runoff from the area generally flows in a northerly direction from a highpoint onsite downgrade across pavemerit, and lawn before entering the roadside ditch along Old Route 9. The result of the existing condition analysis is summarized in Table 2-2 below and detailed computations can found in Appendix A. Table 2-2. Existing Conditions - Peak Flows Page 5of17 �m Table 2-2. Existing Conditions - Peak Flows Page 5of17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS September 22, 2008 SWPPP 3. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 3.1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed project is located along the east side of NYS Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, NY. The project area is approximately 12.71 acres encompassed on parcel grid identification numbers 135689-6157-04-649335, 135689- 6157-04-614375 and 135689-6157-04-649374. The current parcels are to be developed by Adams Fairacre Farms. The proposed development includes the construction of a commercial building, greenhouse, outdoor storage facilities for landscaping products, access roadways, parking, and associated utility installation. The development will include drainage improvements, areas of wetland disturbance and mitigation due to the disturbance of the onsite wetlands. The parcel will be serviced by municipal water and sewer. Re -grading of the land will occur throughout the project site to promote drainage and provide for acceptable building grades, parking lot grades, roadways, storage space, and stormwater management features. Drainage structures will be installed beneath the proposed parking lot and access road systems with catch basins installed throughout to direct runoff towards designated stormwater management areas. 3.2 POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS For the post developments analysis, the stormwater runoff characteristics where considered at four (4) design points. Portions of each watershed drain offsite areas and flow towards the.design points or points of interest. Des.ign points may be a point where concentrated runoff in a stream or swale leaves the property or just indication of the general direction of overland flow across the property line or through a significant land feature. A brief overview of the design points and contributing drainage areas are described below. Design Point 1, (DP1), is located at the outlet of a jurisdictional wetland within the development which lies at the southwestern boundary of the project site. The upstream contributing watersheds varies in cover type from woods in good condition, open space in good condition, Y2 acre lots and the proposed buildings, outdoor storage, and a portion of the proposed parking lot. Runoff from the developed portions of this drainage area is collected within the proposed drainage network and diverted to a stormwater management practice prior to exiting via the wetland. Minor flooding of the lowest portion of the parking lot collection system is anticipated during the 25 -year design storm in this area. Page 6 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 Design Point 2, (DP2), is located along the eastern side of the northbound lane of NYS Route 9 at the entrance to an existing 12" diameter CMP culvert. Runoff from the area generally flows in a southwesterly direction from the proposed parking lot and is diverted to stormwater management practices before entering the existing grassed swale along the eastern edge of NYS Route 9 and ultimately to the existing 12" diameter CMP. A small portion of parking lot and the access to the lot directly discharges to the design point without water quality control. This area cannot drain to a management practice due to the challenge of meeting the existing grades in the adjacent areas and consists of approximately 1.5% of the site. Design Point 3, (DP3), is located at the northwestern property boundary where a small roadside ditch exists along Old Route 9 as well as through a proposed storm sewer system along Old Route 9. The upstream contributing watershed varies in cover type from woods in good condition, open space in good condition, and impervious areas including portions of the proposed parking lot and entranceway. It is this watershed, Drainage Area 3 (DA3) that drains the northwestern portion of the site . Runoff from the area generally either flows in a northerly direction from a highpoint adjacent to the proposed site, downgrade through woods, and lawn before entering the roadside ditch along Old Route 9 or enters the parking lot collection system and is diverted to stormwater management practices prior to exiting the area via the proposed storm sewer system below Old Route 9. A small portion of the access to the lot directly discharges to the design point without water quality control. This area cannot drain to a management practice due to the challenge of meeting the existing grades in the adjacent areas and consists of approximately 1.0% of the site. A summary of the proposed condition peak runoff rates are shown below in Table 3-1, and detailed computations can found in Appendix B. Table 3-1. Proposed Conditions - Peak Flows Page 7 of 17 15 25 41 DP1 1 DP2 1 2 4 7 DP3 1 2 3 5 DP4 1 3 4 6 Table 3-1. Proposed Conditions - Peak Flows Page 7 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS September 22, 2008 SWPPP 4. WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS 4.1 UNIFIED SIZING CRITERIA The unified stormwater sizing criteria has been used to analyze the impacts of the proposed development and to develop stormwater management practices that reduce erosion, prevent overbank flooding, and help control extreme floods. Impacts with regard to an increase in runoff for the development were analyzed at Design Points 1, 2 and 3. The following outlines the analysis and findings of said criteria as it applies to this particular project. 4.1.3 Water Quality Volume Water quality treatment will be designed to capture and treat 90% of the annual stormwater runoff volume or the full water quality volume (WQv). Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria is used to determine the required water quality volume. The referenced formula below is used to determine this volume. P*RF *A WQV f 12 Where: WQv = Water Quality Volume in acre-feet P - 90% Rainfall Event Number in inches Rv = 0.05 + 0.009(1), minimum Rv of 0.2 A = Site Area in acres I = Impervious Cover as a Percentage A summary of the required water quality volumes are shown in the table below. h. tea` °W - ., M 6 lei I c 1 0.53 0.53 0.38 0.15 2 0.10 0.10 nla 0.10 3 0.09 0.10 nla 0.09 Table 4-3. Water Quality Volume Page 8 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP 4.1.4 Stream Channel Protection September 22, 2008 Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria is used to determine the required Stream Channel Protection volume (CPv). In accordance with the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, stream channel protection is accomplished by providing 24-hour extended detention of the 1 -year, 24-hour storm event. The requirement does not apply for discharges directly discharging to streams determined to be fourth order or greater using the Strahler-Horton method, or when recharge of the entire volume is achieved at a site. The CPv detention time for the 1 -year storm event is defined as the time difference between the center of mass of the inflow hydrograph (entering the SMP) and the center of mass of the outflow hydrograph (leaving the SMP). A summary of the Stream Channel Protection (CPv) detention times are shown in the table below. Table 4-4. Stream Channel Protection 4.1.5 Overbank Flood Protection Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria is used to determine the overbank flood control volume in order to prevent an increase in the frequency and magnitude of out -of - bank flooding generated by urban development (i.e., flow events that exceed the bankfull capacity of the channel, and therefore must spill over into the floodplain). The requirement does not apply for discharges directly to streams determined to be fourth order or greater using the Strahler-Horton method, or when a downstream analysis reveals that peak flows increase by less then 5% of the pre -developed condition and that no downstream structures or buildings are impacted. Overbank Flood Control requires storage volume to attenuate the post development 10 -year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qp) to predevelopment rates. The TR -55 "Short -Cut Method" is used to relate the required storage volume to the required reduction in peak flow and storm inflow volume. This method is primarily used to estimate a storage volume given a storm runoff volume and resulting peak discharge. Page 9 of 17 RT 1 1440 1775 2 1440 1445 3 1440 1494 Table 4-4. Stream Channel Protection 4.1.5 Overbank Flood Protection Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria is used to determine the overbank flood control volume in order to prevent an increase in the frequency and magnitude of out -of - bank flooding generated by urban development (i.e., flow events that exceed the bankfull capacity of the channel, and therefore must spill over into the floodplain). The requirement does not apply for discharges directly to streams determined to be fourth order or greater using the Strahler-Horton method, or when a downstream analysis reveals that peak flows increase by less then 5% of the pre -developed condition and that no downstream structures or buildings are impacted. Overbank Flood Control requires storage volume to attenuate the post development 10 -year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qp) to predevelopment rates. The TR -55 "Short -Cut Method" is used to relate the required storage volume to the required reduction in peak flow and storm inflow volume. This method is primarily used to estimate a storage volume given a storm runoff volume and resulting peak discharge. Page 9 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 A summary of the Overbank Flood Controls are shown in the table below. gig r 1 16 15 2 4 2 3 3 2 Table 4-5. Overbank Flood Protection 4.1.5 Extreme Flood Protection Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria is used to determine the Extreme Flood Control (100 Year Control) volume in order to prevent the increased risk of flood damage from large storm events, maintain the boundaries of the predevelopment 100 -year floodplain, and protect the physical integrity of stormwater management practices. The requirement does not apply for discharges directly to streams determined to be fourth order or greater using the Strahler-Horton method, or when a downstream analysis reveals that peak flows increase by less then 5% of the pre -developed condition and that no downstream structures or buildings are impacted. Extreme Flood Control requires storage volume to attenuate the post development 100 -year, 24-hour peak discharge rate (Qr) to predevelopment rates. The TR -55 "Short -Cut Method" is used to relate the required storage volume to the required reduction in peak flow and storm inflow volume. This method is primarily used to estimate a storage volume given a storm runoff volume and resulting peak discharge. A summary of the Extreme Flood Controls are shown in Table 4-6 below. Table 4-6. Extreme Flood Protection Page 10 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP 4.2 STQRMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES September 22, 2008 Three (3) post -construction stormwater management practices are proposed. The following key considerations have been addressed in the design of each stormwater management practice. SMP #1 This stormwater management practice is designed as a Micropool Extended Detention Pond. •Feasibility • The SMP is not located within jurisdictional waters, including wetlands. • Potential hotspot runoff is acceptable for the practice although it is not anticipated. • A separation from groundwater is not required as the practice is not located in a sole source aquifer recharge area. Conveyance • 25 YR storm flow velocity exiting the practice will be non-erosive as a rip rap apron is proposed at the outlet. • In lieu of a forebay at the SMP inflow point, Pretreatment shall be provided by a CDS Hydrodynamic Separator. • The pond is sited in area of B soils and a clay liner design provided. Pretreatment • A CDS Hydrodynamic Separator has been provided for this SMP. • The pretreatment unit has been sized for capacity of the full Water Quality Flow based on the water quality volume. • The inlet has been designed with non-erosive outlet conditions. • Direct access for appropriate maintenance equipment is provided. Treatment • The SMP has been designed so that the Pool contains 72% of the WQv where 20% minimum is required. • The length to width ratio for the pond is 3:1 where a minimum of 1.5:1 is required. • The surface area to drainage area ratio is 1:43 where a minimum of 1:100 is required. Page 11 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 Landscaping • The perimeter of the SMP is surrounded by an aquatic bench. • A safety bench is not required as pond slopes are 1:4. • A landscaping plan for the SMP and its buffer have been prepared to indicate how aquatic and terrestrial areas will be vegetatively stabilized and established. • A pond buffer has been provided that extends 25 feet outward from the maximum water surface elevation of the pond. • Woody vegetation will not been planted or allowed to grow within 15 feet of the toe of the embankment and 25 feet from the principal spillway structure. Maintenance • Maintenance responsibility of the practice shall be with the Property Owner. • The principal spillway will be equipped with a removable trash rack, and accessible from dry land. • Sediment removal in the forebay shall occur every five to six years or after 50% of total forebay capacity has been lost. • A formal maintenance agreement is suggested to allow maintenance access. • Direct access will be allowed to the SMP, and the practice will not be covered by any impervious surfaces. • The riser shall be located within the embankment. • Local slopes prohibit the installation of a pond drain; pumping will be required. • The WQ / CPV orifice shall be a reverse slope pipe with a gate valve. • Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall terminate in a safety bench. • The principle spillway shall not permit access by children. SMP #2 This stormwater management practice is designed as a combination of an Underground Detention System with CDS Stormfi#ter Units providing Water Quality Treatment. Feasibility • The SMP is not located within jurisdictional waters, including wetlands. • Potential hotspot runoff is acceptable for the practice however is not expected. • A separation from groundwater is not required as the practice is not located in a sole source aquifer recharge area. • The drainage area to this practice is less than 2 acres where the maximum to any filtering practice is typically 10 acres. Conveyance • 25 YR storm flow velocity exiting the practice will be non-erosive as a rip rap apron is proposed at the outlet. • In lieu of a forebay at the SMP inflow point, Pretreatment shall be provided by a CDS Hydrodynamic Separator and bioretention cells in lot islands. • A diversion structure is proposed upstream of the filtering practice. Page 12 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP Pretreatment September 22, 2008 • A CDS Hydrodynamic Separator has been provided for this SMP. • The pretreatment unit has been sized for capacity of the full Water Quality Flow based on the water quality volume. • Bioretention Cells shall provide additional pretreatment. • Pretreatment storage shall be provide via extended detention for 100% of the required WQv. • Direct access for appropriate maintenance equipment is provided. Treatment • A precast manhole with the StormFilter system with filter cartridges filled with Zeolite, Perlite, GAC blend (ZPG) media shall provide treatment of the full water quality flow based on the wafer quality volume. • Pretreatment storage shall be provide via extended detention for 100% of the required WQv. Maintenance • Maintenance responsibility of the practice shall be with the property owner. • Sediment removal in the Bioretention islands shall occur every five to six years or after 50% of total ponding capacity has been lost. • A maintenance agreement is suggested to allow maintenance access by the town of Wappinger. • Direct access will be allowed to the SMP. • The CMP pipes, hydrodynamic separator and filter cartridges shall be maintained according to manufacturers specifications. • Pumping will not be required for maintenance of the majority of structures as the practice fully drains. • Minor pumping (<1') may be required of the manhole structure containing the ZPG cartridges if a recent small event has not activated the cartridges. • The principle spillway does not permit access by children. SMP #3 This stormwater management practice is designed as a combination of an Underground Pipe System with CDS Stormfilter Units providing Water Quality Treatment. Feasibility • The SMP is not located within jurisdictional waters, including wetlands. • Potential hotspot runoff is acceptable for the practice however is not expected. • A separation from groundwater is not required as the practice is not located in a sole source aquifer recharge area. • The drainage area to this practice is less than 2 acres where the maximum to any filtering practice is typically 10 acres. Page 13 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 Conveyance • 25 YR storm flow velocity exiting the practice will be non-erosive as a rip rap apron is proposed at the outlet. • In lieu of a forebay at the SMP inflow point, pretreatment shall be provided by a CDS Hydrodynamic Separator and bioretention cells in lot islands. • A diversion structure is proposed upstream of the filtering practice. Pretreatment • A CDS Hydrodynamic Separator has been provided for this SMP. • The pretreatment unit has been sized for capacity of the full Water Quality Flow based on the water quality volume. • Bioretention Cells shall provide additional pretreatment. • Pretreatment storage shall be provide via extended detention for 100% of the required WQv. • Direct access for appropriate maintenance equipment is provided. Treatment • A precast manhole with the Storm Filter system with filter cartridges filled with Zeolite, Perlite, GAC blend (ZPG) media shall provide treatment of the full water quality flow based on the water quality volume. • Pretreatment storage shall be provide via extended detention for 100% of the required WQv. Maintenance • Maintenance responsibility of the practice shall be with the property owner. • Sediment removal in the bioretention islands shall occur every five to six years or after 50% of total ponding capacity has been lost. • A maintenance agreement is suggested to allow maintenance access by the town of Wappinger. • Direct access will be allowed to the SMP. • The CMP pipes, hydrodynamic separator and filter cartridges shall be maintained according to manufacturers specifications. • Pumping will not be required for maintenance of the majority of structures as the practice fully drains. • Minor pumping (<1') may be required of the manhole structure containing the ZPG cartridges if a recent small event has not activated the cartridges. • The principle spillway does not permit access by children. 4.4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MAINTENANCE The maintenance of all stormwater management practices will be the responsibility of the contractor during the course of construction and will be the property owners responsibility after construction is complete. The NYSDOT and Town of Wappinger will be responsible for maintenance of practices located within their Right -of Way. Maintenance of the various components of the system is described below. Page 14 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP September 22, 2008 SMP 1 shall be inspected on a monthly basis and after all major storm events (e.g., after each event where 3 inches of rainfall is exceeded in a 24 hour period). During the inspection, the NYS DEC Maintenance Inspection Checklist should be utilized to properly maintain the practice. Filtration and Hydrodynamic Separation units shall be inspected in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Underground Pipe Systems shall be inspected in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. In addition, the following items should be checked and repaired as needed: • The area between the normal water surface and upland discharge points should be checked for erosion, and all eroded areas should be stabilized with topsoil, seed and mulch immediately. • All culvert outlets and inlets directing stormwater either into or out of the practices shall be checked for clogging and accumulation of sediment or cleaned as needed. • The areas immediately surrounding the culvert outlets and inlets should be mowed monthly during the growing season to prevent the growth of trees and shrubs. Additionally the accumulation of sediment within the practices should be monitored and when sediment accumulation within a practice has visibly exceeded the capacity, it should be removed by a dredging process (or equivalent). It is expected that sediment will have to be removed from these areas every 10 — 20 years. • Catch basins and manholes should be inspected annually and after all major storm events (e.g. after each event where 3" of rainfall is exceeded in a 24-hour period). Debris and litter should be removed from the basins and manholes during these inspections. Sediment will have to be removed from the basins either manually or by a vacuum truck when 10% of the available capacity has been used up (e.g., for a 12" sump, when the depth of sediment exceeds 1.2"). In addition, the structures should be repaired and/or replaced on an as -needed basis. • Grassed swales will have to be inspected on an annual basis and after all major storm events (e.g. after each event where 3" of rainfall is exceeded in a 24-hour period). During the inspection, all debris and litter should be collected and removed. The swales should be checked for erosion, and all eroded areas should be stabilized with topsoil, seed and mulch immediately. All culvert outlets and inlets should be checked for clogging and the accumulation of sediment, and cleaned as needed. The grassed swales should be mowed at least twice during the growing season (e.g., a middle and end of the growing season) to prevent the growth of trees and shrubs, and to control weed growth. Page 15 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS September 22, 2008 SWPPP 4.5 POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES Non-structural stormwater controls will focus on preventing non -sediment related pollutants from entering stormwater runoff, sediment control structures, storm drainage systems, and receiving bodies of water. Pollutants that may be generated on a construction site and could potentially enter stormwater runoff from the site if not controlled include gasoline, oils, grease, paints, solvents, paper, plastics, Styrofoam, aluminum cans, glass bottles, solid or liquid waste and raw materials such as sand, aggregate and cement. "Good housekeeping" practices shall be used to prevent these pollutants from entering the site stormwater discharges. The following measures are to be taken to control the accidental exposure of materials and substances to stormwater runoff. • Solid waste shall be disposed of in waste receptacles of adequate capacity at convenient locations to site workers. Regular collection and disposal of the collected wastes shall occur as needed. • Storage areas will be protected from stormwater in accordance with any manufacturer's guidelines for storage of chemicals, paints, solvents, acids, pesticides, fertilizers, or other potential pollutants. • Raw construction materials shall be stored in areas controlled by retention -type sediment control devices. • Equipment wash down areas shall be designated on site and in areas draining to regularly maintained sediment control devices. Equipment maintenance areas are to be protected from stormwater and shall be designated and shall include appropriate waste receptacles for spent oils, gasoline, grease and solvents. Accumulated waste shall be regularly collected as needed. • Sanitary facilities shall be provided in convenient locations to site workers and shall be adequately maintained. • Spills shall be contained to prevent materials from entering water bodies and absorbed with Spill Kit materials on-site. Spills greater than 5 gallons shall be reported to the NYSDEC Response Unit at 1-(800) 457-7362 Page 16 of 17 ADAMS FAIRACRE FARMS SWPPP 5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL September 22, 2008 This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan reflects the New York State requirements for erosion and sediment control. Sediment and erosion controls, installation requirements and maintenance directions are included in Appendix D. To ensure compliance, these plans were prepared in accordance with the New York State standards outlined in the New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (2005). 6. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan reflects the New York State requirements for erosion and sediment control. Construction sequencing guidelines are included in Appendix D. To ensure compliance, these plans were prepared in accordance with the New York State standards outlined in the New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (2005). 7. CONCLUSION This Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will minimize erosion and sediment problems on land undergoing urban development as well as meet New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pollutant removal goals, reduce channel erosion, prevent overbank flooding, and help control extreme floods. Page 17 of 17 APPENDIX A s E r U O o o t I Q �¢— • z 4 r p N 4 L C ON v` 0 � w IOa4 o ❑ � H d m n 0 Vii Com b � h ill U Q X - � N C N � � h IL 0 U m S s E r U O o o y Q �¢— • z 4 J d a UUp C ON v` a J � w IOa4 ❑ � H d m n 0 Vii Com b � L o ill U Q X N N C N IL 0 waQ � mg Cog m E4 Il 04 y 150 00�� i V Oro T � dU_ c X 2- wax �F fll i C� 'I- 4 ,C Il p _Z 11 � Li V 7�+ 0 0 sJO —I4 U Q �¢— • z J d a UUp C ON v` IOa4 ❑ � H d m n 0 Vii Com e o a v b I r a 04 -1 N E \L }} Il .�f9 d (w, —ij m m m In m0 CD CD C7 = 2 = Y m a U N 0 ✓i y ti L u E V o 0 o v No yoo�oQ��oF Of OI N c c�—�(o`?C7mmwC7r mom( u�o nnaa f U a a v Z l0 0 61 a N N > -8 �N1� to h0 (6 M M Nd OL IL (qC u�-i ti �D Om1 1p (mD rn 6mI 6m1 m mao(nmfnvhcnmc � MOm Oh�f1 �rn"Ul f 1S1mO fnN V ooN c I (T NO O0� O OCI C) a a � m K o u � 0 c m oa n a c ai O 3 iati N a� r oLL � U in � N m 4 L � o 3 a w — 79 n 0- ❑ p I I 10 N UJ a o c` 3rn�Y o O O 5 � � E O � o o m � o d i lIm U N m m m U a �o N O y N O m E a o Wv N U m �a 0 m C m r x. C oUp E 0 o Z)m c rn 0, m � J r t9 7 U o a v E N N OIn o N� c `6 0 � C� uc nr pp uj a. x r m mm ma C7 00 0C w Orn cnv x x x x S V -O V -L 0 0 0 o c m aC7 a(0DC9 aC7C y o41o o a o a x°a o°a o o°ti o c Ol U Ol U O m 0 o C7m�°mL���a±-°f a(7 4U' U' Q-C7C p N a N a a m a Rnn L A I a n a n n a n �n--r cam -m Zuraj v,�mmu InnIv� l f) O O O p N c+i 600 0006 c oa � o ai O 3 N a� r oLL � U O eA II v�o U. 3 a w — 79 n 0- N r }L -C LL -Cyr c 3rn�Y o a�U O ? y O D O O yy7 CL m m m U w y 7 N Q w u N U N y � O O y N O m r .coot m a a E � 21 � o 0 0 0 0 o F- rn 0, m � J r t9 7 10 o V vvo � ~ o a v E N N d m 0 a V m I; a rr'm ❑ t v .0 cv t a� u t N N � I � II C � a n 1 0 rn °1 G o N S w J � C a V) W V 2 a I GOQp I oU� ao 0 C) MO r Q n Na HY 0 L N U N O� 9 (} N v0� O m m M O© � � pN1 v U y a o Cho Oho WdY m o n � m ZEE I II a O (O a i ti �n J ❑ O .0 cv u t .2 N � o p L o O m N d a J ISO M -IA [D m m m S 2 2 S ppm O0 OOm{Dm O C C7 C') C7 o `am m ° aim `min ° 7Y� 7 W YS 72oSK D O O P o mtdC9m�m�C7`QU' mn aC7 D.0 _0 _0 at N b N y o a N o m a a e 0 N 4 aan�a li—A n�aa W rN m �m�N�lDm Q sminmcomto �n W v�rno �np p�0 r t+l V Wao OC N W rmm {m�co 7C cnm Nr 6C7 N o C Q O O O O Q Q p 0 C) O C 0 M aN N a N a N r IL a m IL m 1l3 a v" WO Na N 3r y 2�aYu a ji'e°U�� to0N1 V II dC c 0 0 L)YLLpW Q 4 t LL }`- a m r M .0 b �p > C II o D U� mo 4 NU fp $iN7VQ c U rn IV n � m rn U m N N Q w U 4 m W W d Q N p w r o N [J a 1.0 Z N }Z = o � c m 'Ir m N M Oi a O IWfi m J f+l O 2 C v] m m M M m J ❑ O .0 o 0 v .2 E p L o O m � d V) O N a V ao Na HY O L N U N 9 (} N 7 o L M O© N pN1 v O N Cho Oho m N� ZEE O O Ug" Ir m� i [Q]a C 2< U 0 2 N o y p o a t ' N a a W L K IS J ISO M -IA [D m m m S 2 2 S ppm O0 OOm{Dm O C C7 C') C7 o `am m ° aim `min ° 7Y� 7 W YS 72oSK D O O P o mtdC9m�m�C7`QU' mn aC7 D.0 _0 _0 at N b N y o a N o m a a e 0 N 4 aan�a li—A n�aa W rN m �m�N�lDm Q sminmcomto �n W v�rno �np p�0 r t+l V Wao OC N W rmm {m�co 7C cnm Nr 6C7 N o C Q O O O O Q Q p 0 C) O C 0 M aN N a N a N r IL a m IL m 1l3 a v" WO Na N 3r y 2�aYu a ji'e°U�� to0N1 V II dC c 0 0 L)YLLpW Q 4 t LL }`- a m r M .0 b �p > C II o D U� mo 4 NU fp $iN7VQ c U rn IV n � m rn U m N N Q w U 4 m W W d Q N p w r o N [J a 1.0 Z N }Z = o � c m 'Ir m N M Oi a O IWfi m J f+l O 2 C v] m m M M a LL `n• U cri y Na ° ` u N w 11 C rI C LL V) N ! 1 c 3 , ° Y 02 WO m m m a m 4; > U) N N G L C x x z d y(7y� 0 0 0 Yw- vN. O� O� D� •U cj U� D O D( _ UO n O� � D D� b y� � anT80*4 6T-8*6 CP " U Ch OI U CT U � b E O H C G G o y C? W Q M Y O Q b C7 0 CL R D A C7 D nN(9 aCa0U:: c• 7 po a o0 R ° n R N A N° II- m N n Q` N om CL ndana nd a o v a m N o 0 0 ' m41 rmmr^m Vlr W m o o F^ ', rn�nmmrn�Dm ut mrn lD Y o w m c QI�� ID0C7 � rmM� NM6l CPrm mrlh O W �O 1�1~CIi J �r or oY oo Inmth O O O C] 0 0 0 O 0 0 r 0 0 H O r E M o m := M a 0 v i`7 N r r � � � o J C ya C Q71 p U o P � o � fn W x y a F c0¢o V 90o 009 4 N y¢v � '= af ` N �o y 0 o 2 N U y a o 14 U LU 0, X I a LL `n• U cri y Na ° ` u N w 11 C rI C LL V) N ! 1 c 3 , ° Y 02 WO m m m a m 4; > U) N N G L C x x z d y(7y� 0 0 0 Yw- vN. O� O� D� •U cj U� D O D( _ UO n O� � D D� b y� � anT80*4 6T-8*6 CP " U Ch OI U CT U � b E O H C G G o y C? W Q M Y O Q b C7 0 CL R D A C7 D nN(9 aCa0U:: c• 7 po a o0 R ° n R N A N° II- m N n Q` N om CL ndana nd a o v a m N o 0 0 ' m41 rmmr^m Vlr W m o o F^ ', rn�nmmrn�Dm ut mrn lD Y o w m c QI�� ID0C7 � rmM� NM6l CPrm mrlh O W �O 1�1~CIi J �r or oY oo Inmth O O O C] 0 0 0 O 0 0 r 0 0 H O r E N o I � i`7 N CS b p 00 J C ya C Q71 O m o � r y a 0 ca V 4 N It � o to N j 0 y 0 2 N W b 14 U co O fA m m 'F-- =�O � E G pyo 0 o NK Y � N a m cn U U9 -0 Op II r i Of ] ry 0 O H Q F N n 'K y a s W dx X- KF a LL `n• U cri y Na ° ` u N w 11 C rI C LL V) N ! 1 c 3 , ° Y 02 WO m m m a m 4; > U) N N G L C x x z d y(7y� 0 0 0 Yw- vN. O� O� D� •U cj U� D O D( _ UO n O� � D D� b y� � anT80*4 6T-8*6 CP " U Ch OI U CT U � b E O H C G G o y C? W Q M Y O Q b C7 0 CL R D A C7 D nN(9 aCa0U:: c• 7 po a o0 R ° n R N A N° II- m N n Q` N om CL ndana nd a o v a m N o 0 0 ' m41 rmmr^m Vlr W m o o F^ ', rn�nmmrn�Dm ut mrn lD Y o w m c QI�� ID0C7 � rmM� NM6l CPrm mrlh O W �O 1�1~CIi J �r or oY oo Inmth O O O C] 0 0 0 O 0 0 r 0 0 H O r E N N d G v o V C v N � Uy7 V m i � ❑ i � � w� o N m o r a F' z Q a ww m U in U m s p� L p N_ U F ll o 0 0 m p i 4 N ❑ :j W L r 4 9 O y v U U m O N N o noon o12 m �o sino v ... d. ❑ II y U � u F Ran N •N v N C � tin �� O _ II II II oN 3 y qrn $may y v� n oco taa ? pN c7 p Q N N Q1 N o o U ❑ E 2� dE riJ A Vi 6 Jfl w �i \ � & ... . . . . . z; m � . . 9 ... ..\ . .�... \ ƒ . .■ .� . . .. . .> k � \zz 0. &#y ) d... ... 2. \ t)\ \ IL 0 3 / o k 5 ( . CL \\\ _ . � /ƒƒ { ) ! � f \ k \kk ;e# \ 4«« � / k f 5) \)) ) 2 2 §; k \ff § \)/ \ ® ' � � & ... . . . . . z; m � . . 9 ... ..\ . .�... \ . .■ .� . . .. . .> \ � \zz ) d... ... 2. \ } Q k k / S ) ` ) ! � f \ k \kk \ \ k f 5) \)) ) 2 2 §; k \ff § @> m ® \ \\� cn CD § (/\ § § � %k/ \ 0 2/ c , „ \ �}\ / ! §§/ / )CL \IZ » � & ... . . . . . z; m � . . 9 ... ..\ . .�... .. .. . � a . .■ .� . . .. . .> 0 .e .�.. .. , ) d... ... 2. \ o a L6 c VI a Z4 � d L .0 o C 0� c o ` I N Qr t o S Q a o N 0 M E VJ U1 N= oLL L6 vU V d II > L [L LL N U O m vQ d C5 N E 0 ri) L u cn O II U II q oY m 0 V7 3 � N3m3m O > 0> mu `� Q Vo w ti ~ W U �= ¢r M b E N m m � U O()N 0Q Eo N V it ICD Cn r w O � is M N i pVJa � o� � o � N o O o }- m N M.0 � w a } N o O 4- C, > >a wa= it i o o 10 w ,c ' ~ m N N -C '�F N cV II � t o d a o F�' U1 io ui CG m m m m t7 C7Y U)10 Z Z = O O y 0 0� pp�os��s� -� N MQ N Cfl W Of N C o+3 ✓NiY `'3 '-62� p q N n N d> ti 4 Oro m aN no p n ��ndn�nalno �r Nami W [mom rnrntmo a moots mm vr�lnmc 't�oiu ol��n{m�inc ' Inmo m Nd, C]oN c I a NC] d 009 oOo C m o C 0� c o 3�U 0 � o u S N m 3 L t c 'o a O EL > w 0 v 0 E VJ U1 N= oLL L6 vU V d II > L [L LL N U V L N a3 a °.Sw m vQ C5 O �'O cn O II U II oY m 0 o�U U � N3m3m O > 0> mu `� 0 mais L L C L C CL � U a N M lO N N m W ➢ N m m � U M 7 ro ° r~ U M N N o O o }- m � w VY �P m E m c o 3�U 0 � Ura z LLL O 7' S L t c 'o a O v 0 E VJ U1 N= A'% U m vQ C5 O �'O m a CL d nIL- CL o CL N M lO N N m W ➢ N old M 7 U M N �l w w O R to CD N l ti r Ln r G N II Q Z i II of ri II V N 41 d ib F. aj a r r N q / m\ /U 2 22 2; \| . \ CL \§ � �!( ( \ \ m / )§! �®!f / R)]! ( ; � \ k } � � ® g/ 4 \ r m\§ [ 71 ` m(n f \\ z j}\ )§ . ?/ (ƒ r f � o7n \ . a%( 0 \{ } ) q / m\ /U 2 22 2; « \| \§ �!( /\k) )§! �®!f / R)]! ( ; � > 75 « m m m m Z S S 2 fti O O r O r M V m W O M r]Nr oom N� 4��C o 0 0 0 0 o d a d d o C 0 N' 4 o n c m LL N CL O y 41 L Vl Q a I� C � m N Lo g -LL wT O) o 3: > 4) > ;„ LL , N y °tai' �� 3r e C L OY LLL OLL] o o u- mb r/1 In N�VJ7UQ N � m a v IV � U v Wim¢ N � ❑ W n N ti c b NID_ n_ O O O O 4 o 0 0 o O H m N m r M C � nl o I"”' •E o F N o ui 54 46 O to CN _M_ O1 - U 1 , liV, H 0 r 00 N r- M 0 o 0. E 0 J Q C C O O LL p M p E Uo a p a- N o Fi N UJ > fE E N N U �z CDaa =o CD L) m U] O 0 L "5 Nd' :-, w t;0co �o C o O 0 C 2< �- m 0 ? a < wax If X� fti O O r O r M V m W O M r]Nr oom N� 4��C o 0 0 0 0 o d a d d o C 0 N' 4 o n c m LL N CL O y 41 L Vl Q a I� C � m N Lo g -LL wT O) o 3: > 4) > ;„ LL , N y °tai' �� 3r e C L OY LLL OLL] o o u- mb r/1 In N�VJ7UQ N � m a v IV � U v Wim¢ N � ❑ W n N ti c b NID_ n_ O O O O 4 o 0 0 o O H m N m r M C � nl o I"”' •E o F N o ui 54 46 O to CN _M_ O1 - U 1 , liV, H 0 r 00 N r- M 0 o 0. E 0 J Q C C O O LL p M p E I o Fi N m 0 m O N o. F�' m fti O O r O r M V m W O M r]Nr oom N� 4��C o 0 0 0 0 o d a d d o C 0 N' 4 o n c m LL N CL O y 41 L Vl Q a I� C � m N Lo g -LL wT O) o 3: > 4) > ;„ LL , N y °tai' �� 3r e C L OY LLL OLL] o o u- mb r/1 In N�VJ7UQ N � m a v IV � U v Wim¢ N � ❑ W n N ti c b NID_ n_ O O O O 4 o 0 0 o O H m N m r M C � nl o I"”' •E o F N o ui 54 46 O to CN _M_ O1 - U 1 , liV, H 0 r 00 N r- M 0 o 0. E 0 J Q C C O O LL p M p E a t � � 4 r II N ry M a L 2 r o O m ❑ 0 1! b N C I o � � o o 0 � � u E o U N 5 O (n N � L � d o Q n �I oUQo II N - M y¢ 0 V W a Ccoo CU)n E C C v0 No N C p qq r U-0 0 II Ol6 C y N a_ 6 U t 'A Q o 0 0 wa._ ti xF!, m m m 0) U) U) Y x 2 tl17� OOMT-a0 M� rn mmrmaw�n< I O O O O O O O p O C (6 M r L N c0 N II M Z L 11 V, I i. N N C IC Qv d c 1 0 0 3 f•vl —IA o � II II 11 11 Lo N m m o � u -i n a7�0 a Q O o c ¢ n +~ m Q o o m > n m J LU CL SSOa- � a- C.) o Q 0 ! I N `per II � N � 4J �j m Z r Q o 1' J m m m N II o o II ° N LUIc c QOO 0 m p �n m a C cmu�m 12 3 ow v O = J Q �. m 7 i 7 0 0 p '� V 0.. U 11 a a c¢ m m I W o ioO 0 Rt N N 4 N6O to U) U U N r to N y U a °In II II Inti U E E E - pfnp - =W- -160y 160, OCC O C YI'1 O Ih y d y �' II II 11 11 Lo N m m a7�0 v Q O o c ¢ n Q W m > n LU CL SSOa- an. a- C.) � ! I � N � m a c (W) —IA UL a� Ld w� co a[ 9 U to r NQS Cp (o Y a0' U9� roc K W d E 0 c o y Il a m T � 0 0 O C) II w c v o r S h h L ❑ ; a e Q o L Q u N N r ❑ o?? o C O1 � o E r N N C Tr a 0 v F' "rte P o o 3 p u 0 Il u u 0 0 W p 0 0 E c � L d E_ d � \ ; � \ , « ( L6 � � ; \ � ƒ q ,o%%Q��£p e n E4 in ?� R 3 ._�: .n 2. A " °§ = 0 CD % M 5 0 § 0 t:§ 3 § o . f � am \ C m � \ \ } ) � S � , ) k \ \ \ } } J ) \kk \ 2 } ) \ E 'D ) } off § mk R <77 e/2 C? to 0 a§ i :rz Q�e 5// J % z2 |•• \ 7Q to \\ )k) / Q w a� 111 0. X j a� u �a a a j �x � co Q a C7 1? U w cab ! r to N CL p UJa C � o O 'n rnb w a� 111 0. X j III Gi N C7 � ! CL c a 0 N m I L p W .d, L p Q a o q � D W.) —ld m6 pth a0 m V PNmc rio CPQ l [n�11 Odl N V ppN c � of N pOoo O ppp C O n � O d IL n 'm WaT a z ca¢a N U N I c0�o o U. o � ti U O U b _ IL n .n WaT a z ca¢a I U N I c0�o o U. o � co y¢v p UJ o o y =o U c�a O 0LLL w Mb8 C W Vl sl o o.a U� o M o c� 3 WaT a z I o U. o � vU o y a 0LLL w 0LON C W m y� nil C C y L Y ?tD, Q h O J C1 LL N ry a a 0 vi�v=i� � m L I I a a o � U N i vQ iu n � O J � C a{ (n < W � E - Go C U c M 0 C tint Cowl -0 0 ` q u Ute° C C N a wd= m mm ma X xm x3 In CO m r 9 'i !tf fP fP tT (➢ fa � Ip l C nNm as � N O P1 ANO N< t m O O O O O O O< I o.a U� o M o c� 3 a z o U. vU o y .0 I� c O 0LLL 0LON W J, a C D y� nil C C y L Y ?tD, Q O LL O J C1 LL N a a a 0 vi�v=i� U U 2 � U N i vQ iu n � O ,'vza v o 0 � 0- O O O r 1 ID L O n Ol 7 !() N M 0 J LQ O'It V V O U C ~ O 7 E v I C, m p I I � d C N p 7 N N I I $ c o a a o J Q M L L o $ N � o o a � Im L cc9 a p � o N IL w b N U Q rrir W _ O T O C oUN 7 N �o c co °� Nao m c_ u C Sn0 N NK 15 oCC i L N Ua`° Q1U [1 Try Ccs fa ? O O y p II a wax aw E f Isle) M�I� 0 a > a o °- e M CLL N IN o I I N 3 ° •1°.o G HLL �� 3 ya �a R��Ec LL CD U h V II a r c Lu LL O O �j OJ V II�O LL r LL 3 4Y @ M m m m m ° p p SII? II p tUi7 vUi ria v r E ,c }o 12 2 T T Y O u)O'n fn�UQ c q o 0 cl n °-C� O O _� O O a K 2 `w 2 `mtn `v ca 2 2° m `6 oxoa oaf o='o=°a-a 10 U mu- mu rnu-o uao e] NN p h O .0 N O VI O .Y Y Y N O N V N ri N N C% C7 A II N O N r [] N Cl aU aU uUiUr a v �. v �a�io� W o °° a > o p r- o p> N r n ° °O N b a L i al n 7 a n d n n 7 a f1 a O M V N 0 N m o 0 0 p O O O O �CDNmcpmCp Nlp lnrnrn h t7M N�p0.-ryY0.�0 o tnm 00 0000 000000 N O UM CO W M M F o � N O Ll m m m 0 u w mm mow u�c 000000[]00[ u m a c � � I c ex L riLO04 f� N II IIS ~ V a c Q M i'i L II oo 4) O w .: d o V o � ' J ❑ H > E LL IE o N 3 0. m m J¢ w > tU � LL ry C J� E t co U [) c �ro C E M x0 L q- N m > rn M0� o2 i „¢g O o G U M N CD 0 p Z L M UamUL y aN Q •a+mU y s1 0 f!J � O fA o 0 — f 0 � n wax a w U�m olio c i 0 NO mild Wax r m m m 0 u w mm mow u�c 000000[]00[ u m a c 'm N L f� N II Q a o Q M a L oo 4) O w .: d o V o � O m w [E I� IE o N 3 0. m m J¢ w > l o F _ E t co U [) c �ro C E r x0 L q- N N S o [ i M0� o2 O o M N Z L n N UamUL aN Q •a+mU y s1 0 0 — f 0 � n wax a w m m m 0 u w mm mow u�c 000000[]00[ / / +m : \ \ } ° \ ƒ / /I 466 o o \ \E ) k i i k ( -EE / }\77 ///\ \) \- 2 E /&% �2 / »\\j \«ee \f % _ 2«!« o4 §§ t \\ \� lu \!]/ �k | {) £Io§ 2ƒ EL/ j IT \\ƒ ƒ \) \ N u > \ � E \ a 13 ®R, . " ( # \ E 0) § \ k ) KL \ k \Ek \ IT \\ƒ ƒ \) \ N u > -9-- E 13 ®R, . 27( \ ® IT / /\ \\ƒ ƒ N « � 13 / /\ \\ƒ ƒ 13 ®R, . :2' . a� ° . . . .. ....:. / i }\\ \ . — / t / i!; )\ ~ >> ) . .. n; . §O§ Ran d)L5 ... %CO Ewsa . 2a „ . . / ...\ \o « /)< \ „ /j /{} ; » o v CO CO H m CL 0 0 $ O p LL LL In (? Cotn y CN r o Ec3 3 m O a a 0 o �tLL LL ro N b r +2 L Oa e� e� c T o c 3rnV YUY E o OO 0 0 Q LL 3 3 m o m m Co m U O O m a` II t`J C7 i� 0 N N U N -M V) E m = o o m m Y J❑ > E m a .E OU o�N O tl. No No No Q LL' w V V d `p �> v o v o w - o } (na s vi M R`m m`o o rn U S o a'1 }o v 11 eb eC u w'S H 1G N n% U a U N 0Y 01 tT N y Ip r Q r C N II o O W .0 N N C C C m o G S o O +°� N SL N M. - CD 00� ?0ti v a�U aao.� mQ d o m r w o wCO0� N rw o p m n m m m ami �•� ? N Q p d O N n N n o > A l}C i a o Ea' ❑ Y A a A �l IL CL CL a a_ O 'd 17 o b F o L o m d 0 N V]to U W II U L V o0 O O m W Ol h W O N Irl P1 N M O (D OnY]hmrN O 1p Ol LO � aj "p � y,N N Ln W O6�N }SOON O L•7 W a0 C U_ O>N o Oa oo00d d V N r h N W a S If a F 0 � 00 v � u n v V% m r � J � C (D o 0 o E v •„"a- o r � o o � m o C�7 � � N E a j a� o u E n rn co U To 00© va Q p CD Cho N E� pO o C2 O —ad H G U � V ll I C Q)< Q U 0 aN 0d) yQo wax a �W 410 —u CC \ () 31 =z m \ } 3 ƒ \ } )\ UJ � \ } q ) § m § ) ) k } S` ) _3� | o= E ` SQ j \\� \ \j ` G§« ( tm CC \ () 31 =z | / . f Sz � /!) // } )\ UJ � \ } q | / . f Sz m m m m 0 0 0 0 co V) 0 U) m 2 S T J C J � dl cn ; 00 oUt M�C N Q s o w7 vO cgs Ute` e a � c N m- W a m 1 N W N Q) C❑ ❑1 m Lfl (O V' c f 00000 O OdC3 CSOC 0 M N N 'a CL O C U N N in LL y L gra o 3m; �a� OLIL `nN i m1�3�m wlEc O 00 ES RvLL -t LL N LL mr¢D. r U) ❑ f/1 C II} � t 3 i rnV� you o N O O d LL -Win 3v Crr .0 m O O C II ❑ }❑ �c O (00 0) uJ�C�Q sl N d � m � U N ��¢V n D Q 7 o y r o N CV y w ❑ a r o Z d M O O0 � rT E N w: faro I� tm:CCV N II o O U N 7 a, CL moo 0' "" 0O o O N O oAi E Cho N £CK C o pU)o rri is O c o U; O . r V 9 11 C w ¢ N N U t:_ D a o O O y W a- T i � J C J � dl cn ; 00 oUt M�C N Q s o w7 vO cgs Ute` e a � c N m- W a m 1 N W N Q) C❑ ❑1 m Lfl (O V' c f 00000 O OdC3 CSOC 0 M N N 'a CL O C U N N in LL y L gra o 3m; �a� OLIL `nN i m1�3�m wlEc O 00 ES RvLL -t LL N LL mr¢D. r U) ❑ f/1 C II} � t 3 i rnV� you o N O O d LL -Win 3v Crr .0 m O O C II ❑ }❑ �c O (00 0) uJ�C�Q sl N d � m � U N ��¢V n D Q 7 o y r o N CV y w ❑ a r o Z d M O O0 � O 00 _ Cy : t0 t"! 11Z '� 0 o b o F- t` I� tm:CCV 0 N t0 N C7 =tea a, CL moo 0' "" o O N O E O0 � O 00 _ Cy : t0 t"! 11Z '� .Ln fl V I� tm:CCV V r- Im y (DIv =tea a, CL moo 0' "" o o m o � ° CL ,c m H N M o No"o ~ CJ r L O o tD J C o o N m c 0 o o 3 N a+ o m m m y o? Iv I� m L L G _j�¢ o a o 0 o a - U^ o �, o� -o o -off -n m m Wa N U w12 oW �>.am> a m m U �x E rn °unvu a pm Y13 co E i 0 2 - 15 2 Ngoo N 0aa`�0 ofoO0�ae o vaommulam mw Oa a47 > > v> > a �n 7 •� Z a m a ❑ ' - I a EWO oa naanaAn. n - .2 —p -c0 Ko U mu m rnmmrn�mm o r oO V m II UL U m din mom'r °000 NOM m U7 arm �Om1n' fir. W J g T N d r r 0 Q r❑ � Ci I [M C Q LO) ao 0 ov m Fuca cn r a wax Of i r I o ` m cd 1 _ a E C V It CD N 0.- m a 0 o ID urs m ZI 0.'oN N m 'a�� ItN w S IM N W'n m 00 it 3 9 r m o ri ly -6 U a 00 M O N ID IL N E E E O h D y C N Y N L � O o (i UD _ w o N 2 U JU v � 0 LU u1 I W �I a � U '�- U m a • W N 0 ? 'L ' �p�o � � yj ted• �q !� mr�� N o a � o { �I M�© a M N j C N b i c(� O 42 � _iii ui ii a# 13 II Q' N N ¢ y7N m p N v N y to �4 �tlINN -T E E E �QNN N It-- �- m XK O �n w 4=v '? ?.m 11 II II II N a N E 1J.0 ._ �b Ut�g M -O C ¢ � II a� > m a 3 O O pl o 0 0 m o l 3 3 o m 5 y E m m u m m Wa= SEOa �a aU o a I, r I E 0 CL JA 0 0 m» N CL `c �Q Z E L y Q >o Lu E V7 L L N N N r Q1 I' C U N a CD U J 1E TN CMN DN OO h 0 0 o a b O a v w n n o � J � ¢ a C � ao O a Wax i i �a Ea CL � o G CD` {� N CL `c g .. P- m 0 0 O N Q1 I' U J ❑ h z o a a v w a o � J � ¢ a C � ao O a �a wz W¢o � U N I (?Q© r Q � Na C a 'a 0 o a W CL 04o1 -IJ waz 1 E da J v {� g .. P- m O O 04o1 -IJ waz 1 E da J §.. ...�..�....�.. . r- OIT m APPENDIX B O N N � ' C I � I I � F o C N N s N a 11 o yp ❑ � o a U v o oyvy Y O Q L 3 O O C, z 0 a a � r E t. 3 D N�f7C o V7 3 v WET m U U C3 Q i cEc G N Q U t T (7 N� O O L0 O QUO - Q O O H N O C aax a ar d, O � P] N N ..E. ~ t9 p a' d C d � i M C CY.nj p. �p Z N � L n m u L N fl 0 pc N t0 0 4 u N L E E c/} y C N M N I! �❑ N N a o y d a a � a o� .0 U � o o d � t l0 3 Y Ra N E > E 0 � LU n 0 00 x O Q E Oi � O O m U- 1 r co© aV+ p� V ry C II y U1 I� CQ� 0 �d V II c C7 to w m L r E CS a� � rn 00. C J❑ O 'V v 0. o o u U Wam U W i m R O a11 CC N ¢' y lmo i]N ❑b V � .6 W a� bQ O i v; -a .- l U d G Q 9 Oho V E w N m o,� ❑ N r a n W N¢ a �d E O� O Mo 00 a T U m n rn t a a,m o ® w i p 4d N o oro 0 ff. aaz � rr� O W N ..E. ~ t9 p a' d C p O � II t- ORT. t0 � � i M C CY.nj p. �p Z L n _ L N fl 0 w�a? 30 t0 0 4 w E E c/} y C p M N I! 40 N H y d d a � a .0 U � o o d � O C 3 I! E Ra N > E 0 t LU n 0 00 x O Q E uU pOj UN ( ❑ O r co© p� V ry C II y U1 I� CQ� 0 N � t ym G E U3 w N m E N Ct� 00. C .nom W O!�® II Ut �4 R V p ) Q 0 a �� ? a a4x �r I o Vj 1-�N N o ..E. ~ t9 p a' p O � II t- ORT. t0 � � i M C CY.nj p. �p Z 11 N fl w�a? 30 c ccn. o '_. w E E c/} y C p M N I! C y t E � E v P E � o a N N N E R F 9 a o ry I o Vj 1-�N N o o CO m 0� v m J � 4 N m O L o .. m t � m a to U I I a c o 4 N m L 0 O 11 IC LL N V N 7 3 N U .0 U U J fn 19 t 117 N op 0 NCD Y)0 o � IC G N m m o C o y wWz oQ m E 0 If u i N 4 o -0,E 0 iyUry m F � m J � 4 p y 0 O L o .. m t � m r m a to U I I a c o 4 N m L 0 O 11 IC LL N V N 7 3 N U N' � w U U J fn 19 t 117 N op 0 NCD Y)0 o � IC G N m o o C o y wWz oQ m E 0 If u i N 4 o -0,E 0 iyUry y U n _. 3o S ypy O N � VS N CQr C n U LL d in 1I1 m C.l inIc m c m O m b m cc C 11 II co m°m n C F-c 0 7 E 2 oroi � L) r O O Q m i ti 0 c 3a Q ao w 0 aax M O (/J e aF o M Y N M a W coU N 9 _Q N = u1 N Q U N t0 V) ' Oco s:U© pro 01, w ° ; LQ r+ O �vio L N� O N E c Cla N n U d U a E o 9 O n � o � o o o it •� a�� M ��11 Nv VjU7� � T N N t 1 N a NU a 3-- 0 m � J � m p y 0 = d o .. O t a N t to U °a z n o m +0 N 11 IC .r7 m 7 3 II Q o U aao U U w 0 NCD Y)0 d m � J � N p y 0 = d o � o t o to U o o m +0 u 11 IC 0 7 3 U O U U w 0 NCD Y)0 d vi F- wWz oQ m E r o -0,E 0 iyUry y U n _. 3o S -0 h m QU N CQr C Q U i Ec c .-Wo C, V o m C H Z 00 U�v� m°m n C F-c a. E oroi � L) r O O Q m i ti 0 c 3a Q aio aax M O (/J C aF 0 IC N o CL C� V 11 o c o _0 LL EO .0 0 NCD Y)0 0 o N Q m L U -0 h m QU N Y Q U CL C, O 13 0 an m°m n a. E oroi m r O O nor M D ti 0 a o m O M O (/J C r 4l't Vi O M Y N M a W od000 o n H M 0 Fa m \ m \ q .§ § _ § \ °! 40 / A \ 2123 '00) It g § & «; \ k `§L� LL D a. - �j0 ) { 03/ kC9 f E } _ / S/ 2 \ E + g m4 _ 0 \ �- a) \\ ;\\\\<Z _ ¥! / 7 i . ƒ#° f�7 _ _- § // \\\}/ \ 2/ , q % M /g§ / j OR )2 k\ U)) �( ) ! ° u \{ <( ¥ e ; G \k t (} /-3 LU / { u \; / � [ § \: § \ \7 ) ` 2<w # 2U) \ )/ ))/ {$3' e E¥ ® ny = //\ C j # EI � 2 = y I V2 X .- \ q 7 � � d .§ § _ § \ 40 / A 2123 '00) It g § & \ k `§L� LL D �j0 ) { 03/ kC9 f E } _ / S/ 2 \ E + #� m4 _ 0 \ �- \\ ;\\\\<Z / 'c) i . ƒ#° f�7 C § // \\\}/ |$ R % M /g§ / j OR )2 =em2� F- o \ \k k ° u ` <( \k t (} /-3 w/3 j ate= ) )} 7 � � d i uJ dao o a � O ri O U � E E RN; 2_ N X�. V. o L ti 4 II p o a m Q _o O .0 LL a�� o Na Z OOH i. -�..J.2-2Ar i0 e d y UJ Q mo � p o 0 O N a c 0 U Q Q:rF. o o E -CL N 0 o � r o f�6 (} N N c N m L uJ dao o a � O ri O U ig LO E E 2_ MUN X�. V. 70 � v U L CV _o O .0 LL a�� o Na Z OOH i. -�..J.2-2Ar e d Q(UQ tt-= aLl O N a c 0 U Q c 0 a A o dl � v M C N0 i1 a c ar p N c m LL 3 � a � � N ya c c N c c � O x ❑ y � N - v O y y yN O V O O m CL E 0 Cry m rn � m U �ro Jaz b N O S 0 a q 3 V N O m 0 L>_ m (n 00, L O m m'� m }} p o d d ? CO A d O 0 0 w mm mmr�n N � o mmwvo�n m r o 0 o 0 o p p o 0 o c [D o 0 o cp ip O� cp J O p O 0 m N o U N p E M i VN o t IM Q Y tia � om m a 0 p � � O O O = � W � o a C7 00 o V m n T x2 2 3 c 1 6 ti ff a 20 y. r 0a00oC7 vi ova o m`u 00Wa m Lo u) rn U oV M U mu, h'n U C. r N C Yl N •C y C C N r y L I u o W o o m a p O y 3 �0 4] > iA oAn.AAaA� T m r V :E'^ ; U Z; 6t lD /D Cn to lf, 4'1 oo II U� SOV, di N o 7 Cn f� m m, -No rin p�U �otiio oo or O` a` c n Q fL fll o a � O ri O I ig LO o LL X�. V. v U L CV _o O .0 LL N�ac ii C Id Gi E �.m+.-'. i. -�..J.2-2Ar e d Q:rF. o p J V Q -CL N m CD m v m E m o 0 P O �6 (O m O a � V N N p 000 J N N •t N No. n °° ryry o oaoa E N N oa agoa oeoo C:1 r ' N m CL ti a I w a I ,c c m m ro } ap c0 10 1D � a m a m N r 0036. m ` r eD Z v Cli I t l r .� o 0 0 d teaE3 CL � � o F 0> 4o blo D h D h D � �yamaw4 o j a atm 0 >�.>o�����r 0 h a LL Uhl LL c o E 1 g ~ J ¢ I4 y u v m 3 m 3 a o g>o>o� can0 Un o U o 5 to cn0N O to n ar C7 rn rn > vi a o co O� Om m ro' ! C Q �' t cc LL' C Uzid R 0ouj . oQn m E r U �+� odi=� Z,m m u rn N� mm� U o E G r x` I .aA� � a a U Q V N IF U b O 0 v. Q U9 < D N t7 N { tV C cL aisl h o 1L fl Y > O ' Mull 0 N m m CL ti c m ro } a m a m N W m ` o > r O N O II o LL LL LL m a m H rn h ID I o o 0 0 d b m Q R LL F 4o blo D h D h D � �yamaw4 J a L >�.>o�����r 0 h a LL Uhl LL c o E g o Y O Y c o o,'n osU v u v m 3 m 3 a o g>o>o� Un 5 to = to n ar C7 rn rn > vi a o O� Om m ro' (tea �' t cc o y Q�C7 m R 0ouj . oQn m E r U �+� odi=� Z,m m u rn N� mm� U o E G r x` C N N Y p Q? Q r U Q V N moo It O Q b O 0 v. Q U9 < D N t7 N { tV tntnn < h �n qua vatroZ > > O M N �0 o .� N � O r IL A a� m d E O M O n LO 'Ox N T- Nd' f`n o 0 0 0 o ()O F T V OOI IO mu�iy (p4 4 O S d yL m �[°ivn mrom omn mw y y try s foo Nm rw r 000 Nd Vi `Q•O '� ❑-� O �_ O U c] F C< r N o O an.x a �r o � m N � �I m IL � ,c E > m o > j N N N r P] LL II U y y C N ° o •a '^ Y E i rn v .c U � m a LLr 3 o Doti Q A o to Q a n x n W to vi d w e t �❑ N j E o N p 'n U Qno '., O Q z -» a`�i4 Y 2>u W m N N CO) M (� 0 C N¢ o aft d o U N r- N r to ton N N _ II me r o t Dpi > u .. CQo o vw Ec a»i rou''d n Uan�0- y _+'r�i�a a 09 o p COCF- ' ..aS W II L Ut 0 0 0 0 o N Q 4R aa= i r I cc ti o= �a m m N a� o LL N 0 O 04 a+ b C (p LL d � E d c ;moac o q o p�U V N m V O O m OO N a E a 2TS n yeti J d » 0 0 0' w a s rte-. F m o[70 U' a Wv L U Ze�7>>o U CO m O Q n E 05 U U U y Iq (� C E r 73 rtn� fn Ud �N _ N °000 m �.� j� w v3 ti N r l —U , who c' E.si o �a n n n a E a �a_ a CR c Ntr uj O o C e� Z u�ro,-arm o 0 Q O m t0 w (0 m co •OA(° 0 II U ad O rn y.b� eq � (U � CL N U �^ o 0 0 0 0 o r o o U O v7 W CL 71 rr aF 111 6 D V, 4 d x C2 F rs»1 Molj i 00 o m rn w dU No oil II = p M N q baa co 11 11 a a o 1 b 3�w E G7 t w N pJ Q' 3 p oN in Q o ai o v um� N n o o 0 0 OtU c c o o v E r4;. 4 m a. k W U II 'c U u mW Om C.i a m m vi s Dt c fn N o Y Q L NC7N7 U� E o ri -�< p > E o'y o m w m CO .c co uo v m W Q F' = ro E a LU U u oC > :z Qi U GY ui m ° v rnu ro c U E v Q 2 ro EC �CjUory z_ �1 Z)a c 01 00 10 o m . C7 bC1 <¢ 7 0 o ri Y O U C V U vi a r a,0 N N (n n rQ)Q N V1 n 0 0 .m'> v m '17 N t II �U)o Ec oaA3: ,ti o 2VE > omq N Nd' VJ a O 00� O0q �}, y q -b 9 d II Ur` m mrn p m o m •- N ¢ mQ` 11 �r sN N. -O q.- nt7m Q - - d Oi�Qm N �'E L Lia V mpi wmm N o0 vt: c Q Q m a 4 d x C2 F rs»1 Molj i 00 m oil M C r O Z N q baa co 11 11 E G7 t w N pJ Q' 3 p oN in Q A o P o Gi E o d c c o o v E r4;. - t a mco n o Q 7 C.i a CL T Im co U H N o N v E o E o a x a LU r o ui m ° v rnu ro c U E v Q o�x ovo ro EC z_ .� �� M o N C �`N¢m¢ t7 ¢ 3 O y q rQ)Q N V1 n m '17 N t II :� aU N j O- V v y ,ti o 2VE > omq N Nd' VJ a O O0q �}, a�� 11 �r - - d Oi�Qm N '14 V mpi wmm N o0 vt: N CILOCIL � C a i N� c °c a ¢ r'E m m e o 0 0 o e a o 0 o e o a o a s cr H iw>} Moll o m N 4 0 ot�Z Uti x�y > . pR .c o o E O p 6t (s;ol -IA a a b N t � � L QI � J M N N 0 y Q � i c m i U J Q w ` J ❑ ' a O � a E o In � u V ti a IN a IL a o 0 aU N co O US r 7) L, c p� in u E EID o E m o E co N N oLL J¢ 2 w Q`i> W I e m E W O W fo co W r UE l E. v ~4, Q� NL N • W A a O o n g 6 > N o� a y II M U N N m N s-!7 ' r O G i1i N N N > N f•-- y fnr •� N b 0--,t C 0 V �tfai, c II II II '�' � ibm o w y O NV 4 0 ot�Z Uti x�y > . pR o o JC p� m c O p 6t (s;ol -IA O fV > o N Ir a b N t d � N 1 t 'm a � m r r L 0 y Q � o i U J Q M o J ❑ ' a O � a E o In � u V ti a IN a F 2 i6 0 co O US r 7) L, c p� in oN fn 0 E co N c C N 13 c7� 0 0.' F- ap t_ O Unto fnr D m C) a O o n g U-- O c 0 ' c Q < d 9 > CL L 1:1 0r �r w� 0 III A 0, C3. p- o (sNi Mold ' CL M �E M m a = II m m � J T c r m U 5 Go F- o m d J m 9 c a r N i0 N N IL mtnrN vo O Im C a E �0000 N - OCc b O22 Q ° - U a -j U w p U ao 07 a� E r co LLI a¢o � 4m o y Baa U `? O p y r b O o o R d N r C Q m't O N II m o as U)4 Z vy R N C C � 3 d) u m 6v o c o 0 n � LL 7 r Mao Ur pM E r Orna O un "6 d 0.ax ❑o �o �E M m N = II m m � J T c r m L b o 3 a m U 3 F- o m L O O Lu c m N m 9 c a r N i0 N N � mtnrN vo O Im C 0 � �0000 0 OCc M t� m�jUU d' ur - Ilm I4) N la m 7 N N EEE E E o 0 3 3 3 F a .21 m m '? 0 0 0 0 >>>> y II 3 m O E t� E o } — L L =E m't c c_ c R7 �77 N o r- I� r Z vy E E c i-� r-: r, 3 rR 6v o c o 0 LL vv_ m w h N N obi u1"iu E r IS 11 e O r lf1 N frl "6 E E mrrr T� t0 C7 U' (� p � 1 c �mmm m o,u u v C m C N d)� It II II II II ON d Og00. roe Q 0w= �nRn v u-.0{ O O ~b V cc c m 1d o - �oaul 0 O J Y o 3 a m U 3 F- o m O O Lu c m N U E 9 c a � i Iv O Im C 0. uMi O tOO � �D Cn N t� m�jUU d' ur - m m m m r a m N 7jm a C17 °M+2 u�_Ud Na C;'y0000�j = m'G U cC�i o - N g 7 7 D C C m o O �U (a)Q 00 o 6v o c o 0 m U U U tr�j M M M M N C IOII a o p U � 11100000 ,� mrrr T� t0 C7 U' (� LL i c �mmm m o,u u v od LL U imJ d 00 a` v70op Og00. roe �nRn v u-.0{ j a. �+t o � a k I C m r e €a EI ul N F- o u .2 A p m LQo C i - m m b Lo h m N u a ! t t37 1� L ED ro : CS4 N 7 ~ ro Q X (] J C Z Ci y 1mD O N oz (y±, C 3 J F- b. 3 0 LU c ui � O-UOc JClic'mia v a o E r s N o 7 a C LOm .N m 2 N h C 7 7 fl.004 a- a �a wW= R D¢p C U omoo Z,a MON �N � w vi d 47 4 N U ay in O o 33= dao' e - �m F. & oPoo E ANN CL n al n C 4 NO u aaa II V (V [V IV N `7r iy E C V N o N m ul N F- o u .2 A p m LQo C i - m m b Lo h m N u a t N 7 ~ ro to i 0 7 w a o OI � N m Ci y 1mD h 6 a1 N Q p N oz 3 } LD) N Ni 3 0 M � 7 K c c m s o cor O-UOc JClic'mia v o� o m a r s N o 7 ca C LOm .N m 2 N h C 7 7 fl.004 O N O OI R omoo Z,a �N � G7 N IN d 47 4 N U ay in O o 33= dao' e F. 00Hs E ANN C 4 c� ¢r 7 fl7 V (V [V IV N `7r iy E C V N .te�ll lo L To •Y O m V�� V .gyp E:'y rm 1 ly Im �� o omm 'o v o o �N c E E - c m I� VI II II ❑N �� � � o Lo Lu IF c. = o - aax --.Oa- a�a aU m ul F- o u .2 A p m LQo m Q C 4 O II I) O U :! b Lo N N 7 ~ R to i 0 7 w a o OI � N m Ci y 1mD h 6 a1 N Q p N oz N } LD) N Ni 3 0 M � 7 K c c m s o cor O-UOc N v N U Q m a r s N o 7 ca C LOm .N m 2 N w am6 o C m R omoo Z,a i w ay o N w � N CL 3E CIS a m N u d � .E ry r ~ C%l ©.0 r o d o 1! 11. IF 7 U nom l7 J y O .� J 13 31 3 4 _ iC 0. d ad CL N J L 4 0 x p } i -J a 0. o Lo v ao r = V' r N c Q n oVa 00 o E c� n it a oma o Tfflo CO� - ?. m ¢ aw anU to _ o qU = M C2 l6 isl°i meld b d Y p F` td E f O N � m N u d � .E r o d o -C,N N U nom l7 � II 31 Q w iC N J L 4 7 p } V' r N O O E c� n it a o II U O ?. m ¢ = M O Vj l6 U7 l0 u) V _ p F` td aidmm 0 0 a n E:c SOL O J oo p' oNo �' c } A000 O is d m LLI Q) O� T N O i3 Y O d h PC C a V m 2,6 u m m B u(Dm. m to m m m C O M N II R OO. II II - al m m m v! am ❑ f/Y U •- N ^ In i o o, yEEE oy� EM j7�o 3 �� mE o u od"o .}Qu+mU co Jpa ?,��>> o00 3 II =O 6 j O# w� �Y m �� 15 Go FY lnh Z� V U C m op ��otid m r omUoc �N O Qn �Vo V1 ?NT(V �� M a 3 �m p r/J� mt � a- la �m ming 7 W m N In N LID ii.1 E N't I� ¢ 2 mn o C I! � 0Qp ��� OM47 In nMtom aY � U N N� 0 =�i0 h -r 40 Y C.J o u) �m Oa C� NCO C 17 .29 U�� 7 aoCAN � 9 Il Vk II P 1 II a� O-oo d Q CD �� b N m }' O O Ol �.7 C ¢ D C W LL y E �•" Mmm U m V 16c CL a'O oma 1�6 O O F+ E a N O o �C ' a 41 NNN w N# a`a`YSOd e c c a m Edi aU 7 ❑ CIL O C O 0 U) ro d L W O O IC ! oQ_n C�U� w �' 1b 0 Q a F 0 N o !C cQo E II 1m Id) N 7 E " m 'OK E F V 3 C m r r r r 3 �`?NfV Nr Z L � 9 � N a p Noo0 42z r N O � 4 U M p o o CL d CL Y 'A waom N t BIT E 0 N 0 N. O N J L � p O O IC b Q L 1b li � Mm a nano 0 N o !C 3 � Ic Q II 1m Id) N E E E E " m O o o o �>>> F V 3 C t L L r r r r 3 �`?NfV Nr Z L '" a Noo0 42z r N M p o o o f 'A waom L�} m N N N O U�7 U oho T N I� !I II I! it ❑N i C N N NLIZ � mW w oo�E -E,Od oma as LL c BIT E 0 N O > H N y J � T - r a � o a Q t2 L O 1b nano 0 ID 0 o !C Q Ik N tl I) y E E E E a P v o o d»> c 3 L L L Z Noo0 C t u- @@)@) 0 m 's m N N N O U�7 U O �nj avC4 N N NLIZ � Y � o II II II II T� N O N N II> '> t ¢ 3 2• T W w 3 3 O m 0 0 V E - s .,. m o � c = -c c �0a o o o Kdti M (sp) —IA Lo Lo fl? O O r N V r 11 I� d O W aux O 0 o C N b N � � O 71 0 N d O N L O L = 0 U P 0 N U N ID CL N T a w 11 v dWLU W pp V= U N N N Ph N 101 0 =0uJ 07 El y V '^ J d LN NrP d Ny P E II RK = 9 0- N aQ000 O " 7j= m y IIUUON w 4 (°n d E ° I��m ryN-000� U,a«C�(7jm 1Yl �-U 0 Y7 U o00 d mac'/ 10 y v i"i ✓ II II II II W II m ul = = a �EEEE E �1 O KKk. mo o0: =m eco 0 °a .0004y Loo °oaoo ~�� iva do000 �6U �a lO ?7777 N 11 n 3m ° ooc m d d m 3x -J¢ O V (� 0. O N° °�j r0R)oP d O P>> } O N7 cD ul- N ydd Uln L m'.�e amNNN Ngo cC �wp11��TG�no �RUom cowS 0 d r P"F7 V ZNo EE d ro b N i0 o r0 crr a �o N La UO p ¢t< E I1d ro C m N Y w p Up E_ ay V INa ° m o o t7 d a 0 1, Num". V V o zO 249 M N ?Y. 000 P C W ,tU p U vC U O N U II d U �� V� $ N - d'd ❑ Lo 0n o -D m m v, � w � ry NNNN Po,_ U d Nrn_ o'G'G'CiU E't�oU�9 CQo Eo PmmvV a.-. hYdy C (n a p N O o cl P c �vl ,E 2i Z N ` In Eno ;; rMoo o C oo�n Z' _ w 0 C w u N o P S a o� r o m o � i m y y V OSP oYY �n� v d mmm co m ❑ [i U Urn o TmN NNN Or�4 A N p d •� 0 N N 3 "O9 a� m U) IL aoof3 O!_ A?OOvI N �0 ? U0 m N SID W �o d ? c 1 I1 Ll 1111 CL O ❑ Pi C N a I f > N W 41 - 0 , d ° ° ° d Q. L 0 CD 0 !1 U) rr a LL a U E o P NI I N L N � T o O I I d � ¢ � L N Nitl iy N 4 � NN N N N N O d0 O O � O o � c G ❑- 01 % > E��� 7i C y 'a o n pool z N In N N o� u�i d 0 EN N OO P �laY IN F-• (n N n• c m � Tm II II 11 II N � N b T II Ij 1 -Ej W �c 7•c ==On. ° d3 0- LL � H O � hl O a EI C � e p -o`o a >. o o 1- E m o '> tO a`CLam. o a°du o a' i i it O N N Z F - ti J •� illi m O I� -d II Ov o _N m o � N ti I� v IL 41 � �L) a� m o 00 4 'D m o vv7w m g a � y v o rnL v � 6 a `m d'F= a� a a N EE E G��CII o =Q v o +H '� 0 0 0 Www N G,l U C ❑ C3 0 Vi r L N S Ett.c LL a -7: oa vo Uj� UJ > E NV)ti C Q q O r�iUO I� cU i coH= 9 i•+ � � �. 'I it I v m N I CQo d u 6 N N O V u`V N E(V N N O = i aao U II U - O` N b (rlal mall 0. IL O � ; VOA E ANN o �. ® € 1� II 11 II Ali 'E 7 v O> d"o❑ any p -o`o >. o o 1- E m o '> Yk E tl M.) M�Id a`CLam. o a°du o a' i i it O N N Z •� illi m a _N N ti I� v IL 41 � �L) a� m o 00 'D m C -4 O g a y a 6 a E J a a 0 � O Www a C3 0 L� SON may© NV)ti C Q q i•+ � � �. 'I it I v aao - O` N b (rlal mall 0. IL � m N N � t m N m m M F- r U Sd o o u N .c d J U aw ` E W Lu > CD EJ pUa N f ' O O (n p Q r Cf).01 P U C n c 0 0 U �voi 7+co N N C) E 0 aroo O a2 } ` N a IL fl = N 0 rn 0 `m E 0 E P o N � J � m J 7. o P � 4 0 I I P c� I I I I c co B 0 10 m 3 U m m m o II almrno y Y N N N 0 0 � ��n Vl inP Qo 0 0 0 P 0 � m a L) U F m c m d P N m L `O �EEEE E U L N A 3 S O m »7> C I E y ILI tll N 3 EC G L L L t a w E v 0 4 o p Z i N ti N N o 16 N y. t II VV VLl f C t6 N HU 1.2U 61�r• nj j m P N N a o N N P �0 �n u U o {1 a IL I 2 m ro P 7 N j m N � II II II 11 II ❑ N II i > 0 ] Q T L N 70 i ] C111 ° 6 O a 3 O O E U T° O d z = oQ. U) IL [ � m N N � t m N m m M F- r U Sd o o u N .c d J U aw ` E W Lu > CD EJ pUa N f ' O O (n p Q r Cf).01 P U C n c 0 0 U �voi 7+co N N C) E 0 aroo O a2 } ` N a IL fl = N 0 rn 0 `m E 0 O N � J F- V } r o P P c� I I .E m 10 m 3 o O Y N N N 0 0 � p lu O a M N I� a L U c m c m d P N m i n v»> U L N A a�ui� 3 o O m g m o o C N (y N N c =iu A w 5 EP N m..L. aoPON m 16 N o, a 00 4 N II o � �rn 0 0 � II II II Il ❑ N ocnp F- o >yda �cVa m �n u U mvN {1 a IL I 2 Cm OIpPN N �P � r o x c> U x; .rn N 0 C e Lu x Cwo N T L a0 s of-) d z P O D O N 0 P Y pl V P d v e y II LO O 0 mU �� � E v 09 au a 3� 0 0 O N y �U m lC cm X! EII i a`� su�r� uW c `m E 0 O N � J F- V } r o P P c� I I .E m ¢ r 7 N ip i6 !0 o O Y N N N 0 0 � p lu O a M N I� a IF l03 c m N E E E E 'F d.2 > 3 n v»> U L N A a�ui� 3 o n Z m o o C N (y N N c =iu ti V V w 5 EP N P m m m a T-mmm r N N N a Cd5-�� rj0c o � �rn II II II Il ❑ N _ � m S I� o � N w ° m 0 0!g E m o C Q a {1 a IL I V CO r H U M . a) a; . . L W H c d o C00 `m 3 F- V O o m. .E m � olrjo T Q O1 v o s m Y M y0 _ p o M N in U) W 2 a n U L N A a O N m N c =iu ° N aui mU ,° C x cr ado Zvi O i oU� a Cd5-�� rj0c g N O1 _ � m N � N O �U 2 Om _� i �) En V CO r H U M . a) a; . . L W H c d o C00 o 0 E (R N Y � X c (O E p c E _ (`a Q' - ti_, o 0 N � ✓ � y - T m ;00 o F p co CV' � - b J - m o a P ❑ � II > G a F, LO a II O II' (f� m ttl ro o a m YO m ' N '~ tp - o a a0 0 0 o t' N r a r f6 W N O IL a }UlW L) � U m m m Il000 0. b UoE u � 10 OIL N M O naco a L.� 'n Q? p N II > (q W in A U p a. L17 y a o m v U r v M> N p T Q o 0 E c a m oN a s a a m a a S11II W FW.. S u o m o9 ao p o 0 o m Z O- II . �aa CDUo `?0aUI�UU� U r G mo - O ❑ K d GQ� E� mrrr 0. - �LrL LLoa0 o qN�\` O O co0666 V E ooa z O -0. r N� r COW= O O N 7 c C m U pp - O ii �inTNN ,4 r r -6 y 11 O {� CI N r0�u I! I II II �@�UaU O L s� ] cM rno �L U V E O N N P C ¢ 3� o �W� C Q o U W �n�rn m ror II p %U Amo# E Ofn� ¢ �co�tn a a` N o 0 0 0 0 0 a L 00" E �Mrn Orn c a ��W m s ®a T I� II II II ❑�� IV O'c 3 y D o o ui N Q O N C Q rn— W c a E a o 6 v o 0 0 0 Isi�1 M°Ij M 'L o` O12 o o a R o m a` CLax p �Oa` aaT o N E (R Y II c (O E p - ti_, m t o F p co CV' � b - �_ `p II a P ❑ � II > G a F, LO (f� m ttl ro o a m YO m ' ~ a0 0 0 o t' N r a a o }UlW m 0II C 0. b M N C14 U ^ S OIL C I I O N a t W N N N II U M> N p G Q o 0 E Si N- N mo W FW.. S o m o9 ao p o 0 o m Z O- II . �aa CDUo `?0aUI�UU� o �t2 vm mo - m'ii'G ego Ls cr EN GQ� mrrr �� ilcU O O co0666 V o O N 7 c C m - O ii �inTNN 3 E {� pp I! I II II ❑ II O �L ¢ 3� o �W� a �19w1I! aa° oo E Amo# E oma a n. x a� a a` Q) C A m �2 (ND I` U J a � N J w II m m J L O W � II J c6 c a � � E - m a o EL � In O o U J ¢ O p E C) � LLco a -o 0 0 E� O a o y a O } O Ci lyb Y r uj0 c 0 li 0. C' d pmt a E n o Y I L ° O N11 w 0 0 w>0 >7 y O C — ICI ICf IN Iv aICN La I a E}} Oho U vl N N � o r o a o -0-0 rules vm t0/1 yU 0 0 0 0 —Ur O U r y c r Q. C Z�y O N N aaz p' foo C A m �2 (ND I` E 0 o N w II m m J L m 7 N � II J c6 c a h M j o O 0 w I I a o ¢ ml�_ln�N mvl N6O m A II O Oa � a -o 0 0 00 � � o II 00 lyb mmm O 4 o Q�YrO c 7 C' d pmt a E n M w C U I L m w 0 0 w>0 >7 3 C — ICI ICf IN Iv aICN La I O Mi le N N � � r L oEE'>> rules vm y>>> 0 0 0 0 z LLL � r U mr000 Z�y E E p' d Q o N, N OI- mNNN2 t0 m �n I�u]N Nal I��Om m m NM(O t`O o.-CVr M N M omvmr mv]m�mm ioN m�nm�m.-o {o ar �n �n ao Nr vl dm o II`� to c7 v7 V cvm �NM7�r T��m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m, o m a a = �o �nmoo�irrolrio C NIr a7N spmNN MM 7 NNM V K4?m mm tD o ry cp � N 0 0 U CO 0 N to � plm cV o m oo Uo mo N O mOV KN mom0 N all V U' d -p OWON d' XYo Ed V(?:oviNN yR0 0n : >�d p o U�oa � d0 mv,o�ca'o alm N 9, 1i�0.p N IV O� m � UY OWN o r•t0 x L� omll v y?• x to �U�mo v�wa��. x Es m� x ° WN � C a O e p o o 0 U I l 0 �a0 5 II ov,00 mu? v� �UDcciNV�SNUN NO —i! A m �2 (ND I` U1 0 o N w II m m J L Y01 Iq G o Q a h � s i6 Iu o ¢ ml�_ln�N mvl N6O m A II O Oa � a -o 0 0 00 � � o � c a C' d G IGl lal Id IEEE a E n M w C U ° ~ w 0 0 w>0 >7 3 o oa.aa C m le -�Lt ati UO c o m m m C E 0 0 0 0 z N r 1 [n o aoL i p' a Vf YI ul 4) r z oO l � ui ui vi I� II II II I� m 11a nW > 3 olio 0?m� c y 00000000000 O O O 4 0 l f I O o a- a m m m d�n� i p Q 3 �n N olmw 0 0 a O O O O O ai o.-cv c�l�u]01�hw m o N m�� 6 ° a a a�aW t _ _ N M V 3 W a co a_ IL > NO —i! E 0 o N w II m m J L o O m G o o � IIG a h � s � o A II O Oa � a -o 0 0 00 � � o � c a C' d G IGl lal Id IEEE a E n M w C U ° ~ w 0 0 w>0 >7 3 o oa.aa C e le -�Lt ati UO c o m m m C E 0 0 0 0 z N r 1 [n o aoL i p' a Vf YI ul 4) r z oO l � ui ui vi ?' . a O > olio 0?m� E° + N ] II II II II � N ) f II n y [ Mww ° a O O E o N S c c c �Oa ° a a a�aW t NO —i! d m 3 r U o O m G o m Y mora op M Q1 u t a 9 M w C U 2 m 0 9 q V o oa.aa m o� IL Q tl II ati UO c Nv N ' N U H� N O rU KL6 � m z oO i E E LL t! �m ?' . a O > E° I NO —i! I .. ® f � tea= .00 . $ � .00., ( } ƒ � } \ k . .«. . /�3 0 ) } r ) � \ J: 000 \o 222«�nf Oe Sm it \ k \\§§} A 3 z (2 2.§ °� §r#44 �� 2 \± o�066 g] o|§ m& 02� � �• ��_ }) q } E f \} \\\ \ . �\b 11124 A . \§ - , » . CL- .. f � tea= .00 . \2 � .00., � k . .«. . /�3 0 ) � \ . CL- 11-4 � tea= \t7 ~ \2 � 2 ! /�3 0 ) J: 000 \o 222«�nf Oe Sm 11-4 \ / \2 � 2 ! /�3 0 ) J: 000 \o 222«�nf Oe Sm it \\§§} R00 \% (2 2.§ °� §r#44 �� 2 \± o�066 g] o|§ m& 02� � �• ��_ � / z � \ / \ � ) \ \ / / } 04 Q ƒ e A / g � N{ / CL \ ° \ 6 k . q � ! t ❑ F= F= \ ] \ S° , f 5 k ) \ §§ j ( g0 ])\ \ ) 333 M « U)Lu 40 L 2\a \ee ! \\ �k2 \ 00. Gam/ % 2y '�r \ )\} < ! > [2® }/\ \ �_� 1z� A, � / z > / \ � / 04 e A \ ` a04 N{ 6 k F= F= \ ] \ S° })\ f 5 §> \00 j { t 333 \ 0\\ �k2 \ §CIL 7/ k ( o o E ~ ƒ a06= I\2 fll r ~ p m t y N w o � OI r � � d o 0 O o ri � V m Q r Po ID 4 O 'C w w d m F - ti II o �• w a 00 7E {q ro L IN Y o vi U o ° aym�I! 1�4 I� m o U) N dv t E - °NVI E N y �' O � A !L L 3 N O O V U� N Q Fzm II E l 00 U�u�i• m t b7� a9m N a CO = W U) O) (n Co Y € o fn cu •Q s 0 O E O In. Ll U2 U n` L U o m CO W Q cE m w C 83 v Q `ai U N acyl o oUo r o c O 70 o N [2 ° 1 °wo v, R r UJ V a I I O, 'C a� O Z c Q M o O C0�n ��. Uroml� L O 6 O V Cf) o to co O��T _l f0/) Na aN R n 7 Po 6 W 000 U N N h o RIM r tif!' O) CD N t9 d d N O C a a o o � _ T O = LL � O � O C N U 0- N P N Q�� a o� 4 E {sp} •w�lj I I f� o � � ° - c m w o � r � � d o 0 O o ri � V u ~ r N N II o �• w a 00 7E In E o vi U oQr E m ro q a N dv N DN C Q p - m o � r � � L o 0 O m `ro � V u c f a o CL �• w a 00 7E In E o vi U oQr E It Z o C M U C.< N N DN C Q p y L� l U C 4 a� E'� c i W O N Q H a C 00 U�u�i• b7� a9m II U) M y nN C. O O O ^ O In. Ll U2 j J OL m a � m � Oc Z � co (si�� Mali T Irl - 1 CV M II o 1 N o ILd a a p _ dLL I E q a ❑ a .� � m � a ¢ ID 7 w . 16- C rJ . to CD d N 0 p 01 p C 30 011 c l❑� ui. Q...y= M O Z N L $M N O roL 'N L 0 a.O it E p ro� N it u E M d 0 d 41 11 OLro L op ID +� a LU 4E T N N (D 4- 0 U) 00 p¢r 11 c n 7 NQ N in 170' 7E j o o ro�-o¢o omo in III _ U) tv v o p Oma E� oILA 7 o rpi y0 y 0 p K o p I- ' G U S � �• U m fa rn 7`0� II Us m o mo M Qt "a p T ry OL m a Q w o co (si�� Mali T Irl - 1 i i o ILd _ I E a ¢ ID 7 . 16- C rJ . to CD ui. Q...y= M O Z N L $M N O 0 a.O it m p ro� N it u E M d 0 d 41 11 L op = IC J Q. p�.a?0 +� a � c N (D 4- 0 U) lwo} —14 C a ti L p O F r i+ Gl !O O � o 6 L aO N O LL � .� O m u p m � o N V' 11 o L a o c it R N 4 N d jl Q ❑ ° Q O Q- p JQ u^ m a E ti� r li i r ro � t F 9 o ECO E =o c U a �b c O m V o rq VJ h £ Q r ° U) u\111 Q c C rn o e Vl-� m ado 0 0 C n ° Ctf a C o m L 9 LL� 3 N r II Ic CO N 0, t s b N s 46 II t1 N ro n 40 Vr S ❑ yU` N7 r= a O1 O 3 � CO� L U v LL a.nLL ui U x Lo a r rri e o m U O Ill >N CO X U E<< in �f u N �u y y tlJ it oao Q. o M MUN ❑o a o RC7 a o w oLl .0 my E'er ❑ Nd E in m N ?0. O V o aiy V7 ❑ - C 02V U hrnp h OU �o -. 51 d 0 0 o m 0 M (D O m J tl O ' y N a Y N n to f¢D h .- o o M N N v a U vl 1p 11 E I it o Q, x 1 c J a ti L p O J o_ i+ Gl O O � o o L aO N II � .� O m u p m � o a a o c z 4 N d jl Q ❑ ° N p JQ u^ m > E ti� ❑ � N o � r r J IN° ti L p O J o_ i+ Gl O O o o L aO 4 Lo � .� O m u m a E c z O N p JQ O > E U 4p ro U F 9 o ECO E =o c > ° a �b c r O© V O C rq VJ h £ Q r ° N N a Ero C .2(/), o o 2 rn o m mnmyE EL Vl-� m ado 0 0 C n F5 Ctf a C Imo m ti L a w II m N u�- �N y< CL O O. l❑ a N Co N - 6 O N o 6 6 6 6 C _ M W O m u 11 aO .� 00 LL ❑ O Q a c z ❑ o h 0H - � � N U ro o > ° a ao ° m ac o o 2 > m mnmyE EL Vl-� m ado 0 0 F5 o 0 0 Imo m ti ado m u�- N a N l❑ a N Co N - J o 6 6 6 6 C _ M W O � O a c n a O � P E N y t CL c p N a` o � j a fn M o it 3 O IN � 10 CL CLI N ` ` d ay 7 E CL �LL o " o � m Lo U U 0 g c¢o � a m r U o i r cn a �p � i i � 00 N LL IF 42 Oma i7�S m M E [ o� a rm o rn r�a� a J J m o vl C� m , o C r �L 7 c 3 rn0Y m i 2 do E d M C o o�U v) < L m m m m c � C � � ti:O.p n.a= o 1 IC C7 (� II E (n = rz = ❑ a mi E n N o �� o E oCic7 ocn� a >etlo�ax�d U U (� _0 u u rn u m v Cl) aOW= tg m¢ y n a o 'Q -U C U O E O O tV 19 N Y N O 2 00 Q Q O N O r (yON �-U7U y oN U'C7 > v (A f- ,� uo C me o vo o m m• -m Q o c aNl ��no❑nannau_ � n � A oda po 0:-1 C.~ O .� rI m Op rn Q 2uP'i .L-• ,ti, - �`°� 11 OF O- V 7ouim No7 rmN d'1`r m a NN m OOO J Nap T,N T PtnrNOrN �➢N'd I CL 0 ''. c n a � P E N y t N Isl�l M°Ij p N a` � O fn O IN 3m 10 CL CLI �h I 7 E CL o " o � m Lo o. U 0 g c¢o � a m r U o i r cn I i i � IF 42 Oma i7�S m M E [ o� rn I 00 L) vl a am .O ®® m , II �L 7 A O tC 1p: lJi � M C o o v) < �� c � C � � ti:O.p n.a= 44a 'Q -U N 4 o C. 0:-1 C.~ O .� w000in (.P) —lA a � P p o y t d � O fn O IN 3m 10 N 7 E CL P S o. U 0 g c¢o E xa U o i r cn i N IF 42 Oma i7�S M E [ o� rn N ro 00 L) vl a am .O ®® II �L 7 M C o o v) < o a d c c a n.a= (.P) —lA It a � m In N N Lu r t O Q a a V1 � ❑ ❑ a tip' W t G o Y � � p { r o vi m E V V la> o o m til fn ..OJ ❑ > _E o N W 0 r U CO;x E xa c Moo 40 n 7 fn v p II C N C6 C ¢ v o Y d E ro C c N cc F o L 00, 0712 n i �N V! N 0 C O Q a c a. 0. 2 1r CL f- m a a o a C j/1 C a o i1 O 11 O M LL LL LL C N y fn H m❑ M R p y a LL LL LL ao a110 ami.a- ry u y� � II V Il u 3 `t gF Ca ° Y o Y D X U U U O O N O � Q LL L LL 3 d 3 o a o, o > o > N 7 H 7 N (0 W 0_ b � U p y N O N s o Z 7 •� Z n p1 q O O o 0 i (LE o r a o O O O O O m 1 � 1 N a 0 U M N 9 d a 0 3 O m t a BOJ ti i CL � o y "m ri z N G d a N ❑ H o ��3 r« o a O LL Q C,a v 0, .0 F�' ❑ �2 �' R r a o d a c � ❑ m c� ySufl t o N c o 0 mV O O J E o oLL y 0 a 0 A n o v t 9 s c O N90- 0 J❑ i > 1= m m1130 O op Fi a. w ~ o f L7 `m h m m COa O U cn .6°a ='off v U 00 = 16 N UJ Ol 03 N V a Q1 (6 i p a ti E T II c c ua u1 O S �Q m d U E o o $° Q Q a $ o r R m U v any(7Cy w v �,9 7� m M> >M 2 n ai ID o 3: p . g o o 0 0aa M �i fin- m Sn O 0 N o 0 W ooWm�N N 00 U Q> Of 01 V W Y'l (0 L O O C)2u� v) o O p �`mII 1) 040p00 000 y 13� fl7 U W -000m 10 O V W J N -6 ❑® -N ONNMMW otn� aN l6 0 Q OOOr m N O_ N �U o , N 11�o aQ N a IL � C2 W � II r ,Ow z Cl s..Q C U. Q d IV 0 r -A Ch _ o ❑ 0z�� 0 0 ON o a— a ❑ 0t.�tL r � D � - E � mE Vn N H _ � N �' i+wl MAIi Ca /\§ g2= LL � fll ) ) � I \ y � \ � \ u � o k � \ & � \ � §2 k 2! G® . . � ) � I \ y � \ � \ u � o k � \ & � \ � §2 k 2! G® m2 § 9 §\) . @?§ k){ ( /\ 0\{ 22k o � Q C O y M Oil Z N � a ,c A m a o C P A M LL o - r v � N (D Q ❑ .L. � o L a L J � � 7 o O N O .Q LL❑o o E .0 o � m V o 0o'nvy ❑ h C7 F E � �❑ 3 � E o � a W S U CO CD = C, Q CD Q. A E o r �o T Q (n E o 4 L C CI V U 0cv U) o n Ec O K C K � O_ N Y 2 OO v i af0i Q a a �t 'Cpm C) U p N i T N N ¢ Q p p QJ II ETN E a � a`az W o 0 m v V (-iO —1A 0 tV Q .r= Z: .N _C ! N..y G:.a i E ❑'J 0. �. CL b 3 0. 0 _'"N Na - Q C M Oil Z N A o C P A M LL a N bo N m G N !/J a °' N 0 p LL O W c m O .Q LL❑o 041 a .0 � ill � ❑ 3 On 0o'nvy ❑ h C7 F E � 0 a 0 E S p, � C � � m U E o a CI V U oU n O_ o u ,n v i af0i Q nf°i, v, p N N Q p mr ETN E a � CL W o 0 o H � �m L uy sn r W rn w i YY � YY c w J y� J I l O O P ♦u � OJ �'1 W M V (-iO —1A 0 tV Q .r= Z: .N _C ! N..y G:.a i E ❑'J 0. �. CL b 3 0. 0 _'"N Na - C d A o M LL G N !/J a °' 0 p LL Izo >_;; LL N V C 3 On 0o'nvy Q LL #OZ 0 E,c c � ❑ NN fA❑ CI V U oU n U o u ,n v i af0i Q nf°i, v, p N N mr m'=E CL Qr o 0 � 0 0 0 rn m m 0 0 00 P O NOP y� J I � o V (-iO —1A 0 tV Q .r= Z: .N _C ! N..y G:.a i E ❑'J 0. �. CL b 3 0. 0 _'"N Na - C o o a io y Y C O O M L O i 3 m p m o II d r o o LL a �o a � � L o I y ❑ M a a a o � y �m 0 coax 7 r as MUS N moll �_ a �Oa a o O m R II m c m E� C i+ p � N a p4 o v N ai O II U t F ho E E N r cooa =d � MUN E C. m o �o rpm N w a oa O ❑ E L � I q U M ♦+� O 7 � N0.' V) d)U 7 NQ �U N 7 T of 11 U L �-00 to "p ❑ r N R Ua �. N C o o a M N Y C O O N a O i 3 � y O d r o o LL a �o a� J U o r I c II « y c a a E y �m 0 coax 7 r as MUS N moll �_ a �Oa a o O oL m p v N E� C i+ p N .. p4 �a C} N N ai O II U t M c 6 >.N C. m o o t w a U ❑ E i Ir q U M m 7 o V) d)U 7 NQ �U N 7 N Y uyi `mea Q Q y N w r N R �o yy L O L mUp � N } a n a o v C w r U S O 0 0 o N (6 O 0 r 0 0 U m M [ D J r. 1fJ p -60 M. p T _ p..Z. N c..lry a)...Q..a.� a1 O p CL O y Hc 3 LL rr � �IN C O. g o 0 o y Q ~' r o Is}�i —14 O q 4,5n L � � T I I I a a o LL v, V m N N 3 30. LL .50-00 v a 0 N r oQ+`'m I I � N C V II �acY 0 orU to d L L [ to Z n to C7 (n - � � y 0 m oa >T=dY R U v> V �yo2p>�a r".N .0 y O M0 Q Q` 3 UO y o m N U� 10 �f v y 0 N n(7yny Nom.- 7 a :oa�to2 i °ir\i op�$'my a mho a an�a�ia E o0 0 U) 0 0 ID m0 mw m ', 01 �D �7 01 t[f h y O O �y O rn C w r �ood00000 F� m �0 0 I a L � N Y C O O N C O i O � y O d a �o E J U o r I c E V v) coax 7 r as MUS c �Oa a o O oL m p v N E� C i+ p N .. p4 �a C} N N ai II U t M c 6 >.N C. m o o 0 v O v` N U ❑ � U Ir � M m a a o LL v, V m N N 3 30. LL .50-00 v a 0 N r oQ+`'m I I � N C V II �acY 0 orU to d L L [ to Z n to C7 (n - � � y 0 m oa >T=dY R U v> V �yo2p>�a r".N .0 y O M0 Q Q` 3 UO y o m N U� 10 �f v y 0 N n(7yny Nom.- 7 a :oa�to2 i °ir\i op�$'my a mho a an�a�ia E o0 0 U) 0 0 ID m0 mw m ', 01 �D �7 01 t[f h y O O �y O rn C w r �ood00000 F� m �0 0 I a L � N Y C O O O C O i O � y O a �o E J U o r > F E V v) coax 7 r as MUS c �Oa a o oL m p v N E� C i+ p N N� p4 �a C} N uJr ai II U t i pT N ai >.N C. m o o 0 v O v` N aas Ir ar a a o LL v, V m N N 3 30. LL .50-00 v a 0 N r oQ+`'m I I � N C V II �acY 0 orU to d L L [ to Z n to C7 (n - � � y 0 m oa >T=dY R U v> V �yo2p>�a r".N .0 y O M0 Q Q` 3 UO y o m N U� 10 �f v y 0 N n(7yny Nom.- 7 a :oa�to2 i °ir\i op�$'my a mho a an�a�ia E o0 0 U) 0 0 ID m0 mw m ', 01 �D �7 01 t[f h y O O �y O rn C w r �ood00000 F� m �0 0 I a� co LLI 7 o¢r �U� C�0r r � C C ¢ c Oyu 0 C U�� 7+t 0 �[ CL O 2; a. a E m L 10 0000 CD Lf)V n M C VI N 11CL 11_ J L OL 0 0 r m 0 O C m o I0 ro 3 m o a E N Il mm�m `r° o L, r�riY� o ly o f� m C I I C oCL n m t cId n U m p C vly a)a+ v on S ~ 0 0 ° o d77 > 7 N II 3 at o n c u L i o m N 3 N o h z o m I)"6'b u 8 E N it ai N h 7 a r E E II N N N o II d ¢ oma wW o o LL m E SSOduui as Q-0 0 x N 0 a 0 meas o r- Y 1091, 0 0 < o n L 10 0000 CD Lf)V 11CL 11_ O v OL Q�. U C � E m f� m C I I J ~ O o N N N N o II d o rn CL o a w ro � v a`r V� N '^EE °Q -p oCE da o ❑il v d J Z `I `I d I� 'n N N Mm IL L O C 31 2 a o ��� II ad o O w� _ y W a apex �' arn7 mor y�F E—dm ,C Nr N 4 Q 0 m N> CDU� `?O© N@)@1 ~~ m 2m'1, 7 N LN= m ~ o N !n h C¢ o b.� y h u U CV nl y O o Y N h wCL O IUD O Cn C r M (V p [] O 00C ��o ma 12rnh �•.� C'QC) A 11 II If a i c m II 11 D ,+ m c Nu1N CL y 4�0333 CL °p 'a>> Y.Y xCntc nmol �m oa�m Ii a 2¢ am NCnJ ++ v 4!9 to) 04 4 O L 10 0000 CD Lf)V 11CL 11_ 4 ri% x OL Q�. U C (fw) —H o � o v i � E c �! m m oil N y O li C a d N Qm 0 YUw O �n oo � m fn U V - m ow N R > E[n 111 3 ICN o m o a m Kl L ny I'D N U T mD t CcrsIo N C IID IN 101 m n N O o~o N b NU •`-' Gvi Q N G N o ry II N L O E EEm ung ° C]❑ M- N N �U M Q X777 m 3 m to � (� VCL a >< c,F Np tN ¢ V Nv Etter N y � �' �� E on N �ca�� rN ap �x G 7 m � 3 E rc r N d: fV m c6'i p d C N C161 C o p o m m Q N m k U m_ Cpm° p �°�° °b c m c Z• Om m d a A �� a � > W o V W i dI M M u N U Il E 41 p o 0 0 E - m m e o N N w > IU a al c cpp_ iX0. aU ❑ i o k o � r Lfj n a 3 Z•v 3 cEv i moo` cr o M 0)VN !C y J a m U d o U Q d 0 N o � E p U v m pJ, o p co�z GQr r c/y rn ;? Sn o 00 m vX) h�=I CIL a`x O CD w 11 m a c � I � � E R !� II O E I oilU C O _ w min o m c, w[i7 r F-' N � d J d II vWi Wn ui ly U o U \ �`. m C O G. OooO oa t60 o F- LO O C mO D - I! II II M Im. -- 41 U CO p m SII ; EEE !I� �> 7>tN dV G E l L Q O d 0 N W a E r L L o r N U (O A oQr (A v��cJ 3v7 .5c 0M fl_ � Nor w� yea mm kl II ¢ v LO Mr N N p r 3 N � E E a. N �I � y u)c V 2$ �m , N N S-:m _ �� ?.� Il 31 II II ❑N� -ate o d EL 3 N u) ��lU O O w 7, o� L, U) Q@ Q 3 4 b C y a ti N E, m j M m o II p fl- �a 0 0 E 7 [tl O C y N N N 7 0 6 I10.x S0 a°dLL aU � o O tD o � 11 ylU � Y O a N 3Z` �W v m 0 02 CL CL ccOa max o a` I k Q IF CD to le 00 C o v h��ci � N ti d1 . W to LD - E - C B� O N e C � C - F- T O p U lZ N w Ic v ' o o Q N o G Qpoo o U ❑ n >mW cL - I I°n o m c N IN O N N U o cc N ? � F j C O �»> m > J4 a_� d a - - 3 ❑ lo:o 545� U7 o o O NO Ic T 4.2 U O pp�S O Z d a o @Ma oW cm m N N O �o G¢o Yn m oYi U U EN N t o I OUJ� c �mmm c u-,� T m £ I I II 11 I I U N I I O 3 y O > v 9 O a N 3Z` �W v m 0 02 CL CL ccOa max o a` I k Q IF CD to le 00 C o v h��ci � N ti d1 . W to LD - II [N�l M m r d00 P O O �' O IC � � ti E E E N E o CL O' 7 d » a C 3 Q E � Y N m 1 n`p1 oro ri Biu EN r N N N VV O (V O a v 0 t R cc m 0 � y v 32� g'wW o 0 0 E =�00d m WalL i E o Q d E c M N N.. v. ry N a 11 p -p n, � II �u•� T � T II II' 7 � T � � t n L - a a o m > _. as a OCd o coria E N U) C 3 1 v o d d�u •� N O CL I ., a`� a a- - � N ... _> _ 10 ' 00 _ 10 10 o t EEE EE E w? 7C G Q 0 0 0 mLd ]7> ~ > c N V a 0.E a 3 o o st�� o Lai m m x 00W= y. L' o wroro ,� 0 0 0 m z d 11 ONO C U'3ti O . - i p ¢� IE ca oi�� 3 - af- I 1 CQo V11x1U o a� G�o O om O Q C% N � E II IR, T m N O N c � w T� ago II II II v 9;� zd o> -wul m 2�j N .. a C n o '�. O 0 0 E 3 m o O 'i •�� y�� 0. CL a� N G �Oa o m lyau. N o a O O N 1 IIO O c6 - o o t 00 N .> o liE a C T II _O U > Q ¢ to II [N�l M m r d00 P O O �' O IC � C 1d5 10 ti E E E N E v CL O' 7 d » 3 Q ui � N m o� a n`p1 oro ri Biu EN r N N N VV O (V O y a C N m I ANN li II II !I � II> ly C 0 � y v 32� g'wW o 0 0 E =�00d m WalL i U - v >�w v CL O' ui � N m mU 91 y a N 0 0� M N N � N V � t y E LL _. as a OCd X13 i a`� m z n- U F Q d N s 3 � p e tp h CO F- �� b U U N lC c O:� N_ CaC C N o y o n d Ln E v r) n II U U0•c a o cn �n co mU U w 3 W b b ° a_ v � y- 43 C o m to to to v Q tea. T00 011 N fnh e¢o O N mu mo a- _ C%Jp a ID $ rn wWy O Q h m ¢ � � CU� o{jo E nj ZS O M0N tn%a T LO � � o m Q ? C n O LL m c c c N Ot,'--. a a,rn V m o AN AAO II II II a� �a '- at E vj E Q M in 0 Q m U LLI CL s? L N b o0Er� two --1j CL C' C m _c GOaRn O m 0_ LL { II o tO U I I d N s loo o w, E to U m � N s 3 � p e tp h CO F- �� b U U N J o C CaC C o o y o n d Ln E v r) n II U U0•c a v � cn �n c O a p i U w ¢ J W b b m.S o E c t6 o E y- 43 C o m to to to v Q tea. T00 011 N fnh e¢o O N mu mo a N� 41 c! La CV 8�N m ID $ rn o ooino m ¢ � � CU� U E nj ZS O TW tn%a wmu0 � o m O U LL m c c c GrL Ot,'--. a a,rn CL iL 2 AN AAO loo o w, E to m nz >n ID m N s 3 � p e tp h p 4 IY F- O II b U o N".4 o Q T o a d' m fV O m o .moi Q O Q O p m p N � U � p Y o N l l a L m o n II U U0•c F C Im ID IN IN m n mi E u p i 3'E E E 0 0 ~ o o w h 0 0 II W 3 O U QM t) N Fw b h3I-v y- 43 C o m to to to v Q t2 O N O c«o`uU rv000 C °r.m Li O E E a N� 41 c! La CV �O cera m to to m � y o ooino m ¢ � � CU� ,,fi�nn p Fi 'NC+ 'mf"i E nj ZS U O m V m Ea wmu0 � o m i v e,53,5 S LL m 0t.0.0 A ;U) a0000 Ot,'--. .2OOvi II II II AN 7 } 11 1 II II II II 'm6 '- at E vj E m LLI r/iF� o0Er� �tvo "E m C' C m _c GOaRn O m 0_ LL 0- L) loo o w, X � V m 3 0 i 3 m a = 3 F- L ❑ O O ll.l N F U y o U O of cl a o II C p Q o� Ot dtA mU y.� o U � p Y o N l l a L m n II U U0•c F >'oLL' mym I'd E r Q0 Q, mxCC U II W 3 O U QM t) N Fw b h3I-v y- 43 C G II O IQ L o -y t2 O N O c«o`uU rv000 C °r.m O Geo 1n ? CO N a N� 41 c! La CV �O cera m to to m � y o ooino w c � � CU� p od Ntf1 N N [) O p m mw0 YC m N N N X wmu0 oammQ i v e,53,5 S LL m 0t.0.0 A ;U) a0000 Ot,'--. .2OOvi [ 7 } 11 1 II � b6 cU`'I '- at E vj E m r/iF� o � Q � N n- 0) 0) w J a- u) u) a E 00 Lx E qQ7 8-0 N T Q O F ( U) n no � C � IT Mn CL Q a_ N c E p N m O C N J o 0 _ P 0 � c � � Q (D � P F m L O N N N C m U•� no 0 o p ❑ o o i o n. ry II "EEE E ;EEE E d v»> m 0>>> i L G L 3 7 - Z moo p N V STN ON mr/���1 U U V V G w 6 - •ii •�•�+ EN O d N N M O N N 1 r 7 m C p � �'� II II II I{ ❑ N N 9 IJ � C 47 m - Q a W W o N m }i O o�E o Amo SSOa Ira� I 0 N m � O N 3 r O r o o 1- U p o rn F m L O P C m U•� $ o o p ncJ [+l tV o p ❑ o i M � ry II "EEE E O 3 3 O y v»> m . a ULov L L L - p P o P D 37 0 vNi a,1 p M ON U C 1 0 = n. °0000 a r C i N N N d N N M p m d o a o a CA @� N a II rUOc N gb a m Q ; � 3 3 0" 00v E m � M ac: aL N M O C U � N S 'a b> a o Y �) u EU 0 m m � O N N N r O r o o P p I I p P m .£ � L O � � T $ o o p ncJ [+l tV o p ❑ o I I n II � ry II "EEE E O 3 3 L v»> m . a ULov L L L - p P o P D O N � O UPJ7 � r L,j °0000 a r C i N N N m N N M ❑ p7 0 o pui C m � II 11 II II > N ❑ N N I� T 7 S N gb a m Q ; Mal W 3 3 0" 00v E x 0 7 N o �SOa ac: aL ;E I ITT m m 3 1- U p P m .£ � O o IU 0 � T Y m N 0 o t b E M r 2 3cz L m . a ULov U KD (D Y m N Ih I ❑ n x a=" pui a x O oaFo �� o a S I I +f UO N gb r_ � m r N N N 14 O cc O W O S Iq E i a o Y �) EU UI a` ITT N � 0 a O 11 0 Iv 0 c y € 1 4 y o M �- a II did c N_.V QOo N O d3 H d V ° N m II > 0 N p N N U C tiT o_ � II N �..W .�.. ti � •emirs miv o ami� o o 8 '• LO pO � - O Uo d � ll <"' (d � rp, 0 O O O m II YI Q N N - u)a U 6 fn .0 'fl a U 'a> N C N C O C is G h t, r m N T70 t(1 VJ N � G Ga O Ik II II II d Ul? N " U F O O O »> VI d i' m C T 6s J4 O CL U bC N E L w ui LLL N� o moo¢ =7 G O yD7» Z U wU IG ' N L C 4 c O ao dU- 0000 o niNT �m v {5 �r N z V145 W Epp Z_ O N O G,O Gyi=U N Oan (}�N�2 iQr 3 m U UPJ � �j OI CO op DU1am•rn 0 '-po rn �rU C O i`7 7 o 0 0 o d i ID O M y d—� C Q O' 9 (%J� � �• om to �i '�i ii U EN N N o C m C04� SiJ p N n� �u u n all I ny m o Ira am O> CD ¢ O p ¢ yr �' v C lll W m o U OId N O 7 E II ('10 Mol! O ma 2 ��« �•G o m ° w O 11 0 r, 3a�D c5E „ m QOo N O d3 m `i p N N U C tiT o_ � II N - - L N N O 6 oy m VJ G Ga O Ik II II II d Ul? N " 5 s CL mmmm 6s N 2 =;=EEE 7 7 F- N U moo¢ W m O yD7» T N U " ewW ` L C 4 dU- 3 v {5 �r N z V145 W Epp Z_ O N O G,O Gyi=U N Oan (}�N�2 IoI.�ooTo r 3 VI M op C O i`7 7 O M y O IN Nom~ n to �i '�i ii U EN N N o C m C04� SiJ p N c4 NNmu7 "'D m I+J N O `L p r O w n OId V O' a- to 0 �.fi b O ma c¢ t� ro 3 Z.v �mv osuy w m Za m V o� m coil o e a a n O = o o! E o a o m3 s m m ak a� ulvo} t4 Mold Nv d2Y s�•c m ICOR-v) Cc ELiL O Ju o � a o � ii E II o d G Y i F Q`% N o /Cl y... r a t ,o N r- IIp o o II n Ti. 9 > ''C m U'y euoII E M N U N O C C O II 15 x m nm 0 n vii U U O d LLJ..: q a v7 Lo N T �O O O p 01 m O y ppm,- do p _ .. . U J U rnrnw I I o O Q � U o U 11 1 �7 o a 0.O 00 0 II t- 3 d l(1 y m Lli N E L° LO E 0. ��a3 F v eo jiCU =n a - :=, V U i QU �+ G-uiwL �tt o W o oa o mr O lL 043 N E '-P 2 0 y»> O- c O %�� LN CL s 00W2 o¢r E i Ertr p �� V 0 t7o 7 N o aUaUdU mat �o r N 1 N N D U n . r© NCn 1� � ww N Nr EN N 0 b o14 N a � C QC w ) -1 rn �, �. E o G 'G 0 G � C O r C IE _ � �ri 0 7 I1 '� � > ISIS �(noa C o o 3 3 o m E II ± Isyo� Mclj 0.O..= CF c con. O v- �a� 0 ❑ 4' �1 .2s LLT 7 � o � E II o d G Y i F N o a t ,o o �_ euoII E M N U N O C C O II U U O a v7 ♦~ p M Nib N o ppm,- do p o o Q-,.4 U J U rnrnw I I o O Q � U o U 11 1 �7 " 0.O 00 0 II t- 3 d l(1 y m Lli N LO a C 161 161 N Uf 1 NI 2 - :=, V U i W Q 0 0 N a �o �, 2 0 y»> 3 O %�� LN CL s CL E i Ertr p N V nT � ;004 �--Q u WFz 0 b o14 N h (nom � m� U�3 E cj � �ri � r ISIS �(noa c oo 11 TNN j E 'r- .2s LLT 7 TW V4� T 11 !I 11 m R I 11 }. la > O d'd Q> - fA v Q � N N Q i z' 3 W m W LL1 n o a a m 3 o > �v cc)Q o O -i X41 IL 7E c 0.0.M `w 61 m �3 - F r V W U 'E N .0 E C C � c O d 0 Q m cL r a m M � r m M O N o ❑ O N In L o O I o � � } cp O L O N U �yaUy N o-2 va m•GU�° o n c Cl oIfi rt� U K u m m m mw l0 p 3 a C7 (7 C7 p `a li � U 0u ly U U U r w a~ IK Q U � o�000 v �o a �, II II 11 N M V a � E IUI�LL._� mom r �EEu Ori III! C. m O O V W tM a-,e� I I O c C c C. O I I C m cL E m O N I N N � a o a O � u� ' Ct2U U f~ C Mmro mic op n a J f!3 II C Q W d) N NO Or o O o m o II m � d i O U 4 O o oLn C IN Iti) 1 N Q N N N Y E r 42 n 1 NC � E E E E E O O a ti O 0 O p o o p m J❑ a s �, E v>777 Q L E L L L L r W co �.3 EC E Y y p 0 OO 00 O ID 7 MMo tll O oQn N o ted' °i��ry '31nn1'�u) r,E O mav 4 Ol II w w H,� O Komi I� CQr s M O m o 1 n l p o yN o Cd• w IDo M ii q oro >IIM M 7 R nTwm 30 Cc) a ' pNa n CSy v�4(1m oo E$ -� o V o °c 2m dax �❑❑ 550aui su)a m oG� E fa N O n r W N N N 7 m m �'~I vl {�1»N Nmi�ro mrn L � vrn�timlrmirn�rnmo (fly rc'i h�10 m �' rY 1 � 9 U � eo fIJ O N Mn�� �lmU) ,� �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O 9• o '- fO IO Pl O 41`1 Ci u1 0 m •mow n mID7mNNM my o W NNNM 7�i0 [O Ip Ifl [P m I acf0i � INNO�i �dmo hlmolmil Q N mnN Nm1(1 NOlO 0? r Nl(ym�{ (Dm OI m 3 O N N C r O O O D O O O o 0 0 O I O UI OO od 000 Dori o t,- r- co N MIr�JM MMM 17 MM m N N N N N N N N N N N 1 w v 0 0 � 4 N (O N o O U N O o a In (D n p o N o•` c� o II �+Rr coo pQj �U p d� N p tp �oa�N °0 W u o oU'�U7[E mpo m IC II o� Cl ym v a N Y N p> y 0 Q o O n x_Q Eo QO " ANN �v II 0^ : m "12.o po U . N >-� W S ..- S V N Id a R t:! 1 N Vtv� yo mvoy.. C7N rj itl y' N�oo�N (A O II O lq k M y N �CUOoa m t0 N G rn N o n k c x C v c m -ojx���WN O d Q 1 0 O O G N o y V 7 cod, II Dao o m In, p.1A U O C N N O •7 2 N U N m N r) N 1!f EN ry N N N N r b N N N C E U U U p E ?> 'So m a` oo0 cU) n a c E O vi �I R C_ N � O C � O J 7, L � 4 � O � O n N O II N N m Q °O J ❑ ]I N N T go 0 o 0 0. ❑ o o N a Y I„ ❑ oa a J w 1t u ❑ p EE d s[ 'K jj <t J o J4 to E a d = O E O O it I T 7 tli � L o O co F- Oar m V N N C b O G joo Fn n�� Un7 h 4 a o o F C a cp N o Y) 7 0 o ANN fn n` 'ate � o co = Q I I t --:r - am -0-D O II II II 0 d 'pw. m o m N 9 o �� 0 o E E C a �2 m M 3 ail (sia) Maki b � O ~ Iti N 2 C c E O tl N � O � � O n N T m oa ❑ p o d - 'K I ❑ 4� O w Fn Y a h 4 a o o F F �-a fn n` tr o co t --:r - O 12 © - 4A (0r CQp U ntit _ C a �2 m M 3 00 U n 7 9 h II - N ON O0 U m 77' f ,- m n �, a n o d o .. 0 o E tctl E i1 --IA CL 0- h fll 9+ O tU0 b zO _ 00 O co 11 , II = = CD ro o J a !-- Q -d N T O C Fel �.t6o 0 0 N u L o C N ¢ a , o c a n•� o rn 'r 1 U twC r o o N c m Q it J it Ql O ;z E y m p � II d r a 3t°° N,. F•, w C_ ONUyE 1 V] z+ N cz �_ o R u I o as ooa� r E t m" c t o 11.1 _ 75 o r O Qr< J <"?N 16 CL T v) co U) O ed L U p U Or W E 3 v w � O • 2 t 7 O 4 M O rco o ISI O N S 'G N r II — - oUja E'b oa_ a m - apj ate® It it II ^� Z o 00 L2. CL i� a �r C Q� -p ❑ r N n. a Yl N Q L_ R o o U +n vi o fll 9+ O tU0 b zO _ 00 O co 11 , II = = CD ro o J a !-- Q -d N T O C Fel �.t6o 0 0 C N ¢ c a n•� o rn 'r 1 o r` Lo y ;z E II d Ea a F•, w C_ L cc p 1 V] z+ N cz �_ o JQ �>J � o 11.1 _ o r O Qr< J <"?N 16 cD MUN T v) co L Or i Q rp ',2N W V O • 2 t co O rNN 'G zz II V a m - apj ate® It it II ^� (-P) M -IA a o c a n•� o rn a F•, w — II II SEE L cc p � � x e V] z+ N o-6 �_ o JQ �>J 2 11.1 _ o r O Qr< <"?N 16 cD MUN W v) i Q rp ',2N W V • 2 t O rNN 'G C Q m I V a apj ate® It it II ^� CL i� a C F• C C a n. a (-P) M -IA Q) 0° m cr a C N 1 m o y = M IA c �v �_ � ,_ i 13 ❑ a .d+ p m ?• G 0 �lj O co N G Or- - C V ry IR �Q v N N P IL a `II d a C 1�I U� N r oo C E in J O a Q ❑ a ..1 0 � a Q � '� }> 0 O O CL J P bN >1 O 3 LL o V w o 'Dr E s a � ❑ w�� ;? � �❑ j E � o '� u E A z I a V LLl m U cd o 12 O CO 0 Ln ` ¢¢ N r C 1a 7)P O (L J O ? N v 1 Cap f a po 0 Y[np 14 O af It Vl 'O 02 O U rn m m p0 (i �Ypl, v7N �� 0 ®p CIL n 4 oo coq o ma atLx i I O m f0 i� � o K ,c m cr a C N j o y = M IA �_ Stl wn o ,_ 13 ❑ a .d+ p m Lo r� U- M Z 4�i IN I1 = .6 0 M C ° 1 0) C4 c m m m H C G O O H C " LL O m O � N t[j �I a c s o Q 0 � a m ❑ I� b N C m 22 M L � L o u Sh = II o m a a 0 clv 3 a o LL N m f QO ❑ c a y L Y o N o o � � u E ,F. ro � o m o � r J o o m O J LID o r U cows c ~ r �Uo E E 0 o w o, O o L o LL❑ 3 m = L NfAr o� o� m L s E c 0 O v NE7 vim 0 7 n Ln co a m N N v �� Ja w > E N N< y U CL tN ow m m O 1 Wa to rnou rn U m dL G �' f• 6 N II =_ of m u > ¢ Q < y U N fl [o o 5a Mi 0`u �1 7<0 a� V H m r• O N > a o 0 � N O OOH N lY � U min ti 4 0 V�v�i �N L mmo m o m r m to N N¢_ TN N N o 0 M N r 0 0 0 CL n a E O c m Q N JI Ln N W M w'Ai 11- M Z CD a 6 O O us C (-A —13 N th s o Q 0 � a m ❑ I� b � L = 0 0 E o a y L Y o � � u E c cL � o m ❑ o L r U cows c ~ r �Uo E E II 73 c = L NfAr o� y L s E c 0 O N H C p L)� va Ln co a m I I U L �� Td N N< aN_ CL -,O p O 1 p ai v ? s dL �F m Q N JI Ln N W M w'Ai 11- M Z CD a 6 O O us C (-A —13 Q p ti d d_ C iLj E2 L Ow o N M ❑ Q o a L � � ❑ m o 0 U�uoi N v�N o O sm c m o r P v1 v t o 0 O 0 - U tLU3 3 a pwp J Q 5 N •C N E a o 0 t i m = p¢ ry X o U 10, r E r 2 E o v a ey12 e ro U Q p 01 C_ E O d d_ 1 0 O LL �u Ow o N M ; M N X 11 E Q 3LO U�uoi v�N w sm c m o r 0 :A U t '1 Y 0 O 0 - U tLU3 3 a 03 C7 •C N �j O - V L i �m N ; id . o : � Lf) 11: N Ellem d, _ LEIS- CL 0 o ws ALL: Q Q P Oo y Q E r (sP) —1i O` N -O C 1 2 R�2 d �F- a a c A `m 1 0 O LL �u M ; M N X 11 E Q 3LO w C IC :A U t '1 Y 0 O 0 - U tLU3 3 a 03 C7 •C N �j O - V L m N R f L7 O C7 of Q 2 U U E o v a ey12 e ro U 'u\i aY v m N N o ✓1 0 N N 0. 0 U a N �W, •� L O Ai N r N R o1'- N N y a d o a o rainy E o � v rp 0 0 000rnr r rn ro r rna� o d o a o M 000 000 C y y'� r M roa r�iro � c r T r a o m � a o N a c � ( m l o ° ° a v a c 1° u ri G N N a� N m o q � o E2 a s N ❑ II o �I� 3 a d o a 3"3a OvNi• LL i r o o N= f C a � c 3 N d o' 0 0�• cn t o m a i J❑ to � E N N °m UiJ O w. O O Ur y N vu, WaC ab T 7 Y m U n c c u �a Go cn m m -`o C' x m N cn o, m '.. O � o— •c'va L � � O p ❑ ¢aim n 'O� Y' N z aorowm�u� N p O� H 47 U rn rn rnvm N co t�.. o 0 V �N U714 No N N om M m o 7 J a C TN R N 2Q -_ rt o000 or- ri cVo u N dp,o 0 om Q Ef t3 � a � L o o p cc O o o � O M O v 4 N 3 N U i � a ay N ap o LL C N L p h N m r o l0 �Ic G Q Q n o ❑ ❑ � Y 0 L LL 3 j d G to b o `i •r C Q p m M m m Y 2 x Y M JIhMN7f�no oM•-N o�u p 0 0 0 0 b t m n I Idol Ali I C N � E I� M N G rte+ 6} CV II CD Q C 11 EV C: M d N U ya cu E d Q 0 O O 0 U -q. LL. F� � a � L o ❑ O o o � = cdc G v 4 N U a m W:z l0 oQ� Y r � � to � o `i •r C Q p V v C U C a+ co m CEE d a L U�vpi v}N dao ® II Ut!! C Q1 b H y� Tcq aN 0. O O O o�� 1.c n.ax w xI- m M m m Y 2 x Y M JIhMN7f�no oM•-N o�u p 0 0 0 0 b t m n I Idol Ali I C N � E I� M N G rte+ 6} CV II CD Q C 11 EV C: M d N U ya cu E d Q 0 O O 0 U -q. LL. F� = Iswl salj 0 d� aaz N L U io N " n w n o a :Fj o N �' [� m U d 4 ti w Y U L J � t O Z �� o o O u7 d E V o o u E Im o 0 N a o 0 0 O m 0 a U d N � ID E= ,3 a o � L m N J a U W OO i U N r In o E E r Z)o - ( hen c— u (J2 o m T d m CL � o a C N C A a A m a > m 7 A O h O M LL k LL 1'4 O LLL LL LL LL aoolovula�vw II r m o_�Qmr 0 O O CIA F [A C eG N II y 0, U I u 11 'oil c 3't 3 0 oX oY oY 0 0 atU U U a u t ti 3 y 3 0 3 a C w O> O> O O N N L�L.RCCL aL{ O fAmNU' tn7 N4J= O U Q o •d 1� In 7 N �' [� [A o d N IA yulo t O Z �� d E O � o 0 N a o 0 0 O m 0 N o 0 r N m m O fD N N m I o ID o] m N J I IO U M r N o O o m I y o N � o v N N 0 v U a I � .Z U s. L T �y Rp_ II r p U �. it C445r- 11 a o v n ti L � =p�w c� J r a a N li7 � � � N 4 0 t 01 V) L L � q ❑ Q p -o U F a Vx v m N a c L o �❑ 7 y E � ID E L o 12 r r co F T O n (a N N u) - ¢ G z v E a :D -6(D c Y O fn CU Inti w u L m V y w L- ,l o 00 r 2 4 Qp (G EC N 1 Tp O N E 3 O C D n0 © y It • � C � n � N _ � O o � am II V .c a -0 v a a N U1 ill 'D O OQo �a EL= L d �H Lo h ti y o N � -C N N 0 v U .Z U s. L T �y Rp_ II r p U �. it C445r- S— r 0 1D LLO o v n ti L � =p�w c� J r a a N � � ❑ r 4 0 0 01 Q � q ❑ ,n C CDn m U o it Vx v m c V �❑ 7 y E � ID E L 12 r co F T O n (a N N u) - ¢ G = `c_ OVo E :D -6(D c Y O fn CU Inti w u L m V y w N •Q � z O T - N N� �N 13L o o Orb c ca aax a W� m m In =SY Lo -NM - N f 0 0 0 g 0 1 o � M m y I 4M-GQ rr MMr t0 N N 0 v U .Z U s. L T �y Rp_ II r p U �. it C445r- S— r 0 1D LLO I11 4). a IU I- N I� E J IQ H a =p�w c� �Q.000- m o 0 0 O C LL a N CL > C , A 3 rn r O. G, liv 3 � � 3 Q � q ❑ ,n C II C z Vx c V N A cn i C r o � M m y 4M-GQ rr MMr t0 N N 0 v U .Z U s. L T S— r 0 1D LLO I11 4). a IU I- 11 a =p�w c� A m o 0 0 O C LL LLa c m II CU A 3 rn r O. G, liv 3 � a m Q A N r E I mE Vx ID U y vj o q O r D 10 w c w r j O 9 Ol J m v5 O is m a It "N C c, sr cit N I� 4) C JId ri r N t II is m C It "N C c, sr cit N I� 4) C JId ri r ; �.. to T Q � o 3 0 m Q ❑ ❑ L a a J � ❑ N O o E o � o In o N aU+ 1� le td U II J U 2 N I r 11 9: [ �OyUo Y 0 Q 3 y 7 0 N L Nyn '^ tlm N �Q nN cL O os O [ 0 R so Q autl I a a I` i I o n R ➢ � a a ry � y r N � o A ❑ a Fes' m C7 Y fll rn n Ivr a o. 1 0 0 0 0 ji 00 co N ti n Pi.. Z N tit h N II r V N ;C R ID Q J a o� =LL L6 (,J.; M°i4 ' C pp lAC'E II N lD Lai'� �.:.L. (O G Z It "N c, sr cit N I� 4) C JId 11 F- O _ a 0 3 0 ; �.. to T 3 0 o o m rn y ❑: CEJ �. �� )( xY KCn i t I a 1s1-1 -iA u n a � a O LL c a C CO K:E "i Q) ❑ rn coo a � N O cV N 3 C N ❑ L c mm J T 0 61 � r a O h o E E o E rn ❑ N L E L n a v, o oma' omm vn " a a e QI wE2 C ¢ Lv o m ❑ y = tZU o N � .cL ON 41 rn E r' m m W II rn j6 i6 Z p m oav U m N N �� N C� � C L 0 7 N ODo U��n V N N 4-0 U to - n r ..C.4 r J' p Q '1 m o lU n1:o ❑: CEJ �. �� )( xY KCn i t I a 1s1-1 -iA u n a � L O LL ao a C CO K:E "i Q) ❑ S3 coo a E N O a N 3 `m g ❑ L c mm 0 61 r a O E E E o E rn ❑ N L E L n a v, o oma' omm vn " a a e C) ❑ J< wE2 Z P O X77 �� II II [A j ALL• L- �a o m ❑ y = tZU o O w � .cL ON 41 rn E mX Q N m m W II rn W co cd oav m F E m N N �� N C� oK C L 0 7 N ODo U��n MpVp 'Y O F -h tnN r o om• r o IA NQ n N c CL 0 a c c O N a ? A N O sIT c -'n n 0 m �- CO 'p w r� M - wn o N p cc w� O QII Po C Qp N m o N II -L y �cnn � a C6 II II II ❑ ' �` rn � � � � 'I in N ¢ 7 V N N 4-0 U to - n r ..C.4 r J' p Q '1 m o lU n1:o p O O� CEJ �. �� )( xY KCn i t I a 1s1-1 -iA u n a � L O LL ao CL 6- C CO K:E "i Q) N t iu � � N _ u n a � L O LL ao Q o a n ❑ ❑ S3 s y G C! _ N O a N o 0 61 r a o 41 E P N L E L n fl In Q)v)incl E a a U wE2 H W> m U n pp -= G ¢_ o N E E p V I S o To 7 O C Cj m �}yaE a�u� orpw fl5o C� oK C L 0 7 N ODo U��n j r N m F -h tnN r o om• r o IA NQ n N c CL 0 a c c O N a CL a`a= sIT 1-- m p + E N t6 Qp d IILo p Z Z w 1 O� O 0 N c m d d N lar h cdd = d J ❑. �Qoo _ a: .s=UL 0 N M u n a O LL o a C R v y G C! O C 11 3 a LLY of 0 P N L E L n In Q)v)incl a m v Q Q j N N O_ p N 75 N L O > �}yaE a�u� cn o D � O 4 .s L 0 7 c j r N m r o om• r o 1-- m p + E N t6 Qp d IILo p Z Z w 1 O� O 0 N c m d d N lar h cdd = d J ❑. �Qoo _ a: .s=UL Or) --u O m O d 1 cu E o @ Ir N C N I I N N 5 O N o N P o ]1 h � II NR's IL r� IIC a o CW W Cl 4 4 q V ¢ a N C V W s F- 00 vmmis is Po �`? o J M II vii t�IJ (�t]OPi o ;!II .16.WW c C Ovi V N J t? N o d N `dO` S N 3 I�jn O J J3 o dE d o m to r. `• o. d N N d' o U SOC 'o d -I= IE o� OOTmta EIE �� O IL 0-2.2-2.2 J ❑ �>i77 id CV oo[ `� V r {n e (iI 9 co C Q p L L L L N o lh tt] t!) Q U v 4Q�c° a m�rcr� 3� E E mons oUo j T0� IA Q it '�i-i • '��i 'y�, E or p ,Qn m O Q nm na O W m o ��y c� 0 v E E Ia N CO �(D O OP o_ C~'' i'' Loin i pt^u N o N d P, P-: t 00c (i�t(1 1°YY cl ti TM c n -EthMt N +d+ 4 II II II It 11 ❑N NNt d �U or L a2 $ a O d U d c c Qatar ¢ 3 Z` o 30 d = w 4 d LL v E N 11roo CL L d 9 'h N d d d O O �. E U C tF ' C dO x 3 d d is Git#' d Q 0.az �❑❑ <<Oav) sa aU 7 E 0 N - d 3 `w O � n � u_ c E � p W U d m N E C R dU.c W a v 00o rn N O L G O P L N d- N 0 W R N I U 0 E11dod, >OLU a U ti Il VN(7C717Q r�3000 `Ij a m o G mU 41 V N W 7r °N 2w a dUU� =N N cII o t YE tn� o {'.. C UOOOy x G�dddC L�'4m� �V o N 0000(Y O �O �O C��toQ p, e y a v � O O pt HZ'S Imo`. r�nN H NU U'C° 6 CO v l0 co W U U U V pU d d d O d d jID v- ; ml7ih d m =u�u 2e:AS 3C7 oo LL V i E CI 2> L>' ICV_ N o -d Il UJ❑❑d m C t b O7�Ow A j N Moto W U p 111 it I t d a CL O —ij aax I i 1 m Q v m II c c v ¢� N J o H N O 6 Oi N n a N o o c m no II oID 0 I-- Nig i6 c0 m',p tPo M7 0 M J W II N s�1 M 7 IN o U u �a E E N t p - 4Eb U o r �y Im c IEEE E1n „�o„ao ca V woii�.. a �n T O O 3�2 F c! V i N V N N y U to Ja w @> JJ I� M m o= k o �� imp �N 0. LLQ — Oda O N� L .0 L ��N c O a it '+U 0 M h coF z 4 7 N Z C C O W "to llm ah ?N �c9� E E arN r N O NI VE2 L L p r M '] N © V V G d N N N N �. N T M m Q u'42 E I II ¢ �� N o c C Q �,; o .C20 j O Ia m U N y,m m N = y E ' �>,aG II II II II ❑ �' a af6- d 03 daO n, 3: - 04100 neo ¢ -M LLv Eyt y�r`Pin u# E 33�� 0 G C •a N N O d N N C. n.2 =�Oa O a'd a- C) 7 W a O r (C N I I flu � 4m Q c "m Q N a7 y �6 i eq `c In o d ti Q C7 Lo .� N w I� a I L UJV/ D o I U CPW O ° n w =• c _ja I� yr � J V o d x o ron •... m N i do d (IEEE U) 2 m C co m ca w N C M (D �>77 31ty N V1 r ,� iCro V �p E Y � O IiQn 3 n u E - L 't Y el 00FY N am O N N r 3 m or E E MV r0'14 m CL Q 2 ma d �ti Q mad �s�ol�Meld c m � Q N a7 �6 i ti In o d ti N w I� a ° n w =• c N I� yr � u°i � o ron •... m N m � � d (IEEE ID m C m w N C �>77 31ty ,� iCro V �p E E��� IiQn 3 n u E - L 't Y 00FY N G i O N N r 3 m or E E MV r0'14 ;UC`�7U d �ti Q mad � m�1 'j7� � i`Nt 11 II �fnp naM�m-,. cYul E E cr C r`n c U v C'T N N G+vu N a m?I 30 0 UI y¢ a@ Q 010 a—W LLy 0 3 3 w- ro a O1� om CL -SQa pyo 0�dli EL c E 0 � 4 N v � T J L � N o o 0 o it L � L a m Q o II h ti r 7 ,a � 0 ID o 0 IIS D � {4 fl C N N IN d E E E y E o > > > > 7 o 3 d L � G L LL o N N N t Z [ Noao o m v ry O m >`uj -� o E O � o TM m II II 11 II m p N N o m o YW � t6 !1 Qi N o 0 m Q o pp N ? . d Qa o 0 m a o 3 o I� m = I b E E a r II o Vi C .> O Cfl W Noao o Y V o a o O m >`uj -� o E o- o ni ' II a T� ry ❑ N CD Iu C i U � mD o m cV p u -eco c F C c c p a O N O W A LL o I V b m U X C K �� m ` N T o $ O c " USN a � m N W � N mU Z' Gm I "� ' 7 q ro - O W Ll! m N V m r O aQi QQE % oa E m o 'S ix E II fsi=� Mali o m cA - o v m CL N SSOn. fin. li 0 in c 0 N o 0 m Q o �aav d Qa o 0 m a o 3 o I� m � IIII Q E E E E a � L L L C o m m m W Noao z C m o- o II II II 11 T� ry ❑ N Iu C ¢ w W lit o w 0 T=s -eco c F C c c p a O N O W A LL ao N a � � N 0 m a o „I 6r V � o `n A (6 R � o U d N � J IL o Ic t ma y o N m E t°n d E L ti a o o Z C 7+ - CL J L FE E ry o CL w aU o M w � oox R c,W= O Q r E d a q oUN O II K 3 5, w w mwwIV LO 113 y(nr Q � SII E23 m G cOQ iT aUb �� o O ,7 L q N C K H c Y 3 O w d_ O 61 -n8 0:2 U � R N R 10 N m orr ww �p w ypCl U c0 °O oU O a 7 7� m o U D U JoI c c 0 CL Qo d _ O_ 0.X t' 4 m�uj OvSOJS U U n E D � � N 0 m a o „I x - Q � � o `n A (6 R � o r � q U c o Ic b ma y N ^EEE m E o_=>> �»� F 3 c L ti a o o Z C 7+ - C J L FE E ry o y C O W OC O rco�eo U d O cmc I° N Il u it 11 O II V 5, w w mwwIV LO 113 c Q aci _ Q E23 m G cOQ iT aUb �� o O ,7 L q N C �, WW U= = c Y 3 O w d_ O 61 q R N R 10 N m o�N �O M N �p w ypCl U c0 °O oU o it ID 7 0 M tri In o O N yh a m JoI 0. L a.0000 d d N} S � (7 t' 4 m�uj OvSOJS �$ oziIl a or, rm'r �In o_oo o R �� C C `0 y C7 C7j "lot II �vMO it it G llU NO w o m cmrlw m "+EEEE ESR °ti xxx R mo.° 07��� j_.oa U) v voGO¢ R _ P .0006, m a xT m r-° ViN v7>>7 it ro�i o00 `.4 U v U7 v? y o x�rmm?�= Lii M°•o r LLL mM tp lL �o m _�pp U.... m O "D O M Z O `0)O C,- E NNN kN7 O U °�`-U G t+ 004'! o V' N 0 uvvi o m U y R p1 � �1 o f m MQ cow ao w 0 0 0 0 R 7 �l0 fpm N NNN �U U clI.IIj �T7 tU6 wl N ti N IM 1 N X� 0. R' p rn `ehN �N43 Yo om qo,N ?ct m Sia �mC7 (7U mq cto �R Mmm c nvuU U.°C9 �tuVn Il VI II N 11 5. t7N U N N R NNN jOU?=7 � O t+N N II �.m n� QN SU7 X000 Ow fi?00 en am Lij It EO 0 0IF Eu m a a7i yuyU� C C J '� 61 rDaw .0s ()�dLL EL > E D � � N C e N O o „I x - Q � r � o `n A (6 R O �• r aq o o m q U c o Ic 3 ma c C Iti la N ^EEE m E o_=>> �»� F 3 c L ti a o o Z C 7+ - C - oi U� FE E ry o N lT T6� a Cr�1 rco�eo oW�n d O cmc I° N Il u it 11 ❑ m d I m 3 5, w w 3 3o R � C m 0 K C 0 EL d IT I 5 'n ai' I N L O U Q CO U c II > O 4) W L d N O o 14 7+ - C 3 > (n a u .a N a 3N.m. ti m d O I° omV M E L Ill C M x-� i uD zM co T - - C o t N O iIL N O M N m� � C I o U os � m "lot •ml N^li u { \ * 7 I » g § \ tofu \ \ \�) � . . }_£ � 7 / 7 77\\ f \ Q @ ®) � . q o j {//t - § o -O\\ \ \t\E /\ 7\« 2 2««# E\ guy �. CL M_ , } z \ � { \ ) \ \ \ � \ . \ tofu \ \ \�) . . }_£ /\\\ \ / 7 77\\ f \ Q @ ®) � . q o j {//t - c -O\\ \ \t\E /\ 2 2««# E\ guy \) g� VI }� }/ }/! { \ , \ f \ \ \ \�) . . }_£ ( / 7 77\\ Q @ ®) � . q o / IL \t\E /\ 2 \{ \) g� VI }� }/ { \ , ƒ . . .... . §C-4�k . q o / IL . g� VI iL e2& + wd IN � al o � $ o m � m o v a C ?, Ipf W 10 Q!r N r U E N s= m y 4 N 02, N O II a � IV LY m 0 � U Il mmk�i,o Q t� 0, W o m op m vi d V CV o m V — iff O = II II IV II N O M = O N N II = CL E E E E i J¢ sS" w V u N L N N p a E wrtrc �oo�v r� �3 ll.l D a 0 4 0 tD O 41 p fl h = 7 Z OahOcNTU D U 0o N10 rpp,, p�11 r CO)a w cA o �1 uj M O N V V U L L 7 r C r {n © � U N C M 7 N N I . CQo n y b m� r Nrn 'pN j( mil: O(OO � N�q,m inw toU .Q 00IV Vzi� �vN 5 E °u yt Oti Ix a` V) aid c Q O- c Y o U it ik E Il N teaW 6 ti c ,E N 0 C O � Im N N 4 0 II C 4) N a 4 m L 0 � E N o w » N 19 O 6 O o on p o � O Ic N c V7 E E E -2.2 E a F C >>7 rr� 3 $ maoo Z � N N T T L N B V2 l U E O ry ooh`° otN � N Q a rim yU r mm to 'G 2 O Ev V Cn"I ? O i � v � II II II II U N + QUO c Q r a m mw W ooE;E �a s r9 3{: �Oa fill ,P� —JA N m 3 r o o m � E N 4 7, .—,a tn W L N B ooh`° otN � N Q a rim yU a 'G 2 `cam O i x°�M a o m m QUO c N O Im % C N :m .E �r a` Oa i s r9 3{: �Oa fill ,P� —JA c E 0 C o I � y I T � � N o � r O 0 yl o � N m v i 0 a m m m m v L r o o O p a 3 c C E E E E q U O H N7 �_i C LL U O O O Z c M V ACV N r L t O t i N m U E N M m �m li !I II a ry U N Y m a0• A � t o � t � U Tp E U O � C vU c ❑ .o a O U O M 4 FS Lh ,U,� W � M qLb U " a K G S N a S o rn O � r Q c u b 2 Y N U w m m a N C O U � p m • o_ Q ? aU U go 33 om Ep I5llMcld p y� .N o o E m o '> omo m ddS D c cpn. kali o IL II 1. b � � v m d a c Y O N 3 3 N � N a o C oai m N w VI ' NU c d n to Q m � v U .00 Il000 � •• o Lao o y N W m � V u nm II U c c N a m Lb dN IN N IN d Ny ^� N 0 h 0 0 0 �»> 7 n y 3 N V M ? ? C ro a = Jo F n xsrN 1 U r E goon z o'"o r 00 oar fA oN{T � �o MUN � p� 7 a7 YJ N rd0 ��@iu �u,o cm ao Nyf� CQ R N A W m�l U� Em N N r O Cpy IIII U N—y �•' �O O � r r � •O a+ G O ID O ��� t om 00 Ubu Tea II ANN 5 n E •- wt: II II II ,II O 7 y p S ¢ 3 Z mw w m Z'U b a CLU p-2 3 3 o m oo5E£.- y v v n p CL CL >F s •c 550a o m CoM ❑ d a` F'I $ E it O � 0 � G m a (0 O NN �� vy ntgNN mr� qm m � � m N A V mN1+11vn mo.-ryf�1? N II m N Q m Md'n N1n a eDrnm o 12 b N L � o o �- N y V '^ m pmemnmimm�mw � � m 3 ^. `o v mnrnl„mdmro w Ma'NAM� 111 t4 rO q;' 6mt ¢ po N C 7 N U s-Mnd N(mr1� I�mm F- M i6 N (6 46 6 co 9 W n QMMMo pmt V '"j � ❑ 11 � V7 � � � «,, pmol In aON y-17 W ro SII �M -vW Sn 61N n. t? '^ +� 1n rNm nr� ��m N i m d G1 N N Im u> m N tin O Nr cj U r E E E E E$ f� E = JU O 2'7>77 U E U IZ ` Il p c_ E L L L S Q i6 f p p p g o p m q O p o 9 E E Y a q� (Dp N p 3 C 61 j E 61 1p�00 p'r o 04 1 6i N N o Z C C W w N m ID 7 m N N M M `d dQn Vlv�3�� EE oo a NNNo,�dlnmminw Oo ,jU a m n ��Q u II d cia 10 mm� } ICNlttvdn N1'1r cnrm d y 652 E U�1 ut N a(N Q NI U -1N V 'mm Qmo NQ1g111 N(nr o lA II p �t E \j 11 11 rnnNc1NNmm rn Qp M �_ mu]171+to V N N Q �i mNE U! p II fel Cm -`Il O N V o U1Oo cWNMmr1MMMMm MM N U b 01 01 ?i u N N N N N NN N N N N Ll.Qo .�.y o o u m rn� aax �o❑ �On. cn Irma aU o Y v W i6 o 01 m L E 11') L _ O NI o u a o n d L � i0 l6 t6 y p t M. O O u ° ypo a L ❑ c a y 'G a m rn o m m � 'E 3 E e 0 0. 0?� tim.urU U co Ja >.' w 0 0 0 v>>> - 7 d) N T a o o o N d S � a m ao 0m oo �_ oa �p O ee U Q c NU3 w co 0¢0 3 pp a[V N(V � V G—q N C; 3 N Or N j N r Not MUN r0©�q N 5 rni al y Nin C Qpp N� N v1 LOU,G 'C1 r �ry N m O 1X 0 00 � NLo m ❑ N to II II it N (1 02 m m 02 E 4-w 3 ry Q' a o £. z'd O d � Na dux F6= oc 5E0a o m raU m ❑ a o N ° � cV o � U N 6 03x1° � go3r to 1D � 61 O N t1 CV p q U mo �o�KN mm II o�mar m°0 �tc>°1��^�1'nn p II o y T� m V m q d N Y N o Ld y u y o u u U,��y�j❑noo�m 01 y m 46 � N y N k' p=Np1n Llp 0 6) QUO oo X^s•1 .'^ c+l If1 b N O Ol ES 4 �n Xa X p�� x.2 ma ��0000 a10i �° o� r U O C N N d M S N U N O i n o 0 0 pp N lrr in �, "! MM 0044 m M N NNN N R U U V n❑nm N M n 0 1O o f o m �� 0 (qa Nd!5 c @ E _ co ° o 3 FW.. �Qo J o - c o Q U o SO_ 0 0 Uj> � 0 O N i � O X k �' e 00 •C N p0.U' 007 u� y 00 w dip®p o_>oao0 �a a F4 a Q o ONO m n a n I9f=} —law T a c m aar U ❑ � o O �_ t Ip N L ❑ � O Q. 0 w N 0 3 O D p p O m = ao E E;n� o co m p m � a L) cq M E �UaU 0 NN — - C 0 � O U�� 3 o m d i a - 0 N 4) m Uo m n ry m ry ry n- CL N a w o E 'C Is��} Moljry d W C L d tl • I I q N O � 10 N � G IiII M Ir `m m R E V . 4 Mto c y N N N a a If 7 o i W tm U m r _ ay m 0 1 r �i M Ul 0 EL W 1�/ O �'r l:l Nya UQ oU. fL = (qa Nd!5 _ co ° o 3 FW.. �Qo J - c o Q U o SO_ 0 0 Uj> � 0 O N fn P C _ N O X G� N p0.U' 007 u� y dip®p o_>oao0 �a a F4 a Q o ONO m n a n I9f=} —law T a c m aar IT + m m _ } ) � \ ~ { } \ \ � 13 s \ { (L a @ " CL \ ))) S\ \ \ UJ U) CL ) j \ 7)m &«« P E %\� \ )\ § E \ \ a# in )(3 �~ oe® } . m Q4« @ o & ¥ ewe 7 0 0 C) ƒ } CL \{} ) /ƒ\ IT + m m _ } \ , � \ 13 (L -J ))) S\ i \ UJ U) ) j \ 7)m &«« P )i2 � 0 / 2� 2!/ . 2 ILa- _ »Ia IT + m m _ o `T` v E� Qnaa ro »ro a o f/} o n c ❑ cooNI`: ...t 00 cc M Z. O ti r 1 U cl w C J r p 0 o � N ? I I L o ' 16 n o a� v o ti U N N p c Y aN 0 0 E r -- V 0 Y IN o 0 UJ 3 E E. O 7 Im 0 n N w > CL IL 7: aaz I J O¢ 0 J ) E a o 10 L F LU E o U N: O Q O C E r O C cQriV N O in == m CC) ro � y 'r C Q o U a e E �l � to o co t- v m_,n w II Q. C v r4 <4 4. E ❑ J _....Q _a . O. O d IL or- <� E� Qnaa oo o f/} o n o ?o ❑ cooNI`: ...t 00 cc M Z. O ti r 1 U cl w C J r p 0 o N o a ` d Q1 F- C] J >a. ' C Ur momV�n m G o � cvn mmY d a� 17J NQ Y aN b QO 04 U m N r -- O @ S IN R 41 >0 II 3 E E. ° �[ a o w > CL IL 7: aaz I � fA a a i i r u r o o ?o ❑ cooNI`: ...t 00 cc M Z. O ti r 1 U cl w C J r N o o LLN a ` d Q1 F- C] J >a. C C O T o G o � L a� O Y � V1 N Y O @ S IN R 41 >0 II 3 E E. ° �[ a o w > E � fA a 10 � U m � v aQr E r =a O U o r? C) D m dil c � M E a o o o y 'r C Q o u a e L r O u oa [ �o - c00 Ho U N N N Q a N a O y a c u c a CL IL K �r i i oco Eit o ?o cooNI`: ...t 00 cc M Z. O r 1 U cl w C LL CD 11 o LLN a ` d Q1 F- C] J >a. � c m M ID a� U Or ~ 3�°I� a o v > N Y n LL r o � r c w 41 >0 II a G ro U o 7 m � v Z 7 u C � M E a o o o y 0 0 F- r l L r O u C � r O U C 1n Ott O o o r I' od m n � ya a m IgEI, M cm D O O O 0 is N :p � ll N N Q 11 Q .N 0 06- 0) M 1` 11 ,M 0o r m N �v E r a Jo _ O a �l EL aLL a� Q CM W .6> N H N m'EQ-yi 2L O b Q Fes' O C a Q)y-.? r__�..N :W LL v - VJ a o � L � ~ �.c 0 o c d � � L) � O o Ui V a o m b II Na IE a w pati N O u) N U 40- m H a v N ` L L) LU S6 N U o~n E o�o N E C a(,rCo , j m ox o0 ani o rn — m ° c 0( v T E +'' (2 o 1. N � � 1 7 m o U CL CL N uai � w 1 (n N ❑ 17 O M O m N O Q. N O a O 4 � aax 4- •E w o 00 ah 0 o T- v I' � m IgEI, M cm D O O O 0 is N :p � ll N N Q 11 Q .N 0 06- 0) M 1` 11 ,M 0o r m N �v E r a Jo _ O a �l EL aLL a� Q CM W .6> N H N m'EQ-yi 2L O b Q Fes' O C a Q)y-.? r__�..N :W LL lus VJ a o 1,ou o � ~ �.c II 0 t V Y m = d L) O m V 2 E m C a o r, a (e� Na w o w pati v = � to a m a OUo O Q N (d} d l! c n C Q o o�o N E C a(,rCo , j m ox o0 ani o rn — m F o 1c6 � � 1 o CL CL N uai � w N 0 y 9 17 O M O m y i 4- •E w o 00 '" �s��} mold �, I 0 o T- v m a c IgEI, M cm oor�(0 . 0 OOC-OM'0 z {.7 O � N N Q 11 Q O 0 0o r m N �v E r a Jo _ O a� Q O b Q Fes' O C LLL o II lus VJ V 0 o � II m = L) O m V w E m C a o r, a Na vi w pati � o v E m Zo OUo O Q N (d} d l! c n C Q o o�o N E C m ox o0 F o 1c6 � � 1 CL CL o o 0 0 y 9 C a y n IgEI, M cm oor�(0 . 0 OOC-OM'0 z {.7 r 11 r Il L _ C, 114 C'1111, V. 0o N �v E r a Jo _ O a� Q a�LL b Q Fes' O y M LLL o II lus rn eI E e �E m = m � m C a o r, a o o r O O o v m m r w v n N o 1�1 M^li o ro v a it fa I.1 � U 0 o v Q � m c 'E p � m Isl=i rnoli �. aa -r i � m D I I � ill � N � O LL t � � o 0 P <Y t I � N N O d (V Q a o Na LLp m m IY, ❑ I R - y m fD m r '7 J o o y C U Q C r m oY ❑ m o 0 ow N a d ��3y r ac U m 16 II O m a o E, U` S ❑ N (7 rn 7 E U) oEd o (} fn I �13 F- t IL V O u; 1- E o m m to Q¢ VO N O M N5 fA y� u ID rn�m F WWI�+ = Q Q m' 0 n N og7 IL u> v Qu o 0 4] 3d.r O$ ? d o p CO F- `a b o a M m d d TN r e u a o U 0 o v Q � m 'E r � m Isl=i rnoli �. aa -r i O N D ill � N t � � o 0 P Ln I � O d Amo m v p o0 V m fD ~ C W O LD m m r II M 11 y Q n a d ac U o a o C R � Q1 dY H ` a y oEd r Q J =_�a F- t II .. (p m d! o C _ 0. eC, O IO' rn U � m j N Q V N a Q Q 7 O N D � o 0 P Ln O � O d Amo m v p o0 V m fD ~ C W O H C, O N a v C .Q m- po (D m CL C ocl; o N O 0 o ti ` � n Ci O u 3 � ar a N I« � ❑ O b a � g J � Y 0 O = a DO = Q U N m M L u E O to ' m II a �❑ Q to 7 b IC D tl. N Q o 0 LU �_ o oLLL �, ❑ a � SUN U 3 � m w E a � o 7 fn a Q o a N E Is C �i-0 u}i � N m J � o OQ� L) o am a� ❑ _ a rn Ut N� T to N0 ¢ o F N II G ? O An a 5'i o ca 2 d � m J w V y O yC F w O O O O a OJ ti N 0 G N L av+ d a m mm m C7 C7 C7 0 U m n v E m =Y z ❑ u77m- rj) ? 'tl -6-6V N J❑ N E O m 0 o w o m N U Cn a�Q lu ai N m m � U ula W- ,= a U owd Q aay aY a10i pp m a N uOlvvrnu� db «ur Up r Q O O C ? O Y ul �' O S Q N O T' Lo ❑ fl d A A d A� '•�' o OE O O "dam W N T p Z OOr r ppr U W l9 (p (p [7 W O 00 a U�� ~ O rnr �+ N mr O M �++W 'a ja® II V,� (7 SON p>NOY 7N N y N N¢ nN_ N c� Oriti oao coN V hi rJo O a aor U o 7, c C C Q C, ai i Kti I o m 00 0 1 i w�. a a v C .Q m- po ocl; 0 o ti ` � n L ar a N I« � ❑ O b a � g J � Y a� o = a DO = N m o u E d ❑ ) �❑ Q to 7 E J L F- LU �_ o P 00 O E f II ro C SUN U E a � o 7 fn a Q o a N E Is C �i-0 u}i � N m � N �o C OQ� L) N < am a� ❑ _ a II Ut N� T to N0 ¢ o F N R I O An a 5'i o ca 2 d � m J w r� aa`Y w U m s a v .Q m- po ocl; C N and ar 00 J p av a ❑ a� G .0 LLL d ❑ p L E � II t ❑ tl} I/3 E P U E a � o 7 fn 2, U N a N o u}i � N m C m o o _ a o F 5'i o 0 d � m J w r ol U O O m s O N O o b 0 3 a v o � � m .0 ro N N til m I I � I 0. C 1^ _ N ❑ it o Q � o a d O o b O m r N L L ti �rj ❑ m N a n y a I o � ❑ O b v ll! m a N �o Yn L >CL Q o 0 N d b J a1 J ❑ tp z U (n Qr E It MUN 0 1:a1 C -o II [ 0 a E � uy��� c E O cn 7a+ C,� � c d V h t y Im 00� t-- L) L) 3rnVY n ` E (7 z o N a ) p JD y > Oe w E .r de CO EoC7a�a �v e cub o - O. ILS 6fnL CoLU t--= o ro E N d} =a N oc Qr.- o �i�y� co�o� C) O 6UN E .J. m O Q� !2. O LOO N 4 W r Cl d1 C N N r O C Q 10 N a a a0 m N E U r a n Y co 'OAC N a� NT Via' �,O mr N�1a 0 U rm mm�n. U n N O P) a 'p9� II V1 L!! V N12 and O N r N m a 0 a N t > P ma Cl- ca a E an`.x 1-0 o � KH i o b 0 3 a v o � � m .0 ro � I I � I b 0 3 a v o � � m .0 a K o ti ri 1^ _ N ❑ it o Q � o m O o b o 00 cn, m . t+1 IL to � c ❑ m V 0 ? C E -C o N L o v E m a N �o Yn L >CL d E N d b J a1 �O ar U (n Qr E It MUN E 3 1:a1 C -o II [ 0 p O C N uy��� c E O cn 7a+ C,� � c h t y N 00� t-- L) L) 3rnVY n ` �i C. U) L j N N nLL- m03 6 o a 0 0- � N a e cub o - O. ILS b 0 3 a v o � � m .0 K N A mA t0 � lD m it N EL 3 N p C Of LO G E 11 Zti. o 00 cn, m . t+1 IL to -C w lY a. • C1�1 1F a�LL N d b J a1 ar " p O C N uy��� c �O 7a+ C,� h t y ❑ 3rnVY �i C. nLL- m03 p �. - e cub o - N N 4 wN O m m Cl ro Z V O O O m U 7 - 9.5 11 00 .t O O >:2 Q ¢` N N O P) t0 m 3 O Ci V N O_ v > Cl- ca a E N 1-0 o a 0 o H N m c0 w d0 osm r, o a c . o0o000 (OOO o o0 [D 00o Oa'�P m J - - - - 4NN(? n 3 0 0 0 0 0- R ou+V M N O U N 7 O � ap N �I m a I � Oc � W CO CC E � N 00 U W m V'. = o LL � o n On U) a a o � ❑ y Q v 4 � UL woo u o pID E A F o U a m o 0 s u ❑ m � cor= y o U7 N C, a N � o 4 Q O E 0 2-6 11 S}�- 0 V7 = u v�N O ' v�� n U a 0 N O NQ U ° CL r, Va W 7 N J S E 5 W CO CC E Cn a 00 U W m = o (02" MUN [V On U) a p a r v n I C3 w � g woo o pID E A F o N s o 0 s u cor= N U7 N C, a N f�17 O a o 4 Q O ¢ ^o 0 y , ° 2-6 11 S}�- v�N O O O m i708 �0 O ' ' - O S y > i o � a U U U C O._ N ✓ p Y N N P 'SY ml'- v °mrr M m °�'E Q m a -r' �n-n n na �d— o a o umim lD �9 �P W cv � m oo rn N c v p iNm N r N m N -1� O NCA r o o o o m N s 000000 --oa F M rn E �^ O N O 1 00 d a ti Q C v U � b v QQ'^ Vow o Y CO CC E 00 11 a o r o :o a C3 w a. ti o g a o E A eE N s o 0 s u cor= N o¢r C? o Lo ¢ ^o _ ov,o v�N ' v�� n O NQ U CL r, aax 0 1q of m u. u � ,m a c ~ m m rc m a 6 Q a o u d p a i� a LQ a U Q LL. N d p _ ~ n o I a c o !n Q ❑y o m N - N m Q N H L wo N U 1-4 m S m e Q U� J 0) 7 E oNo (7 u� E a c R x U a � wpo a U] a L O yW ID N N i0 U N m II m C7 y d tN�6 11 Q IL = .G 4, @ U n O N ti IIv O 7 G N -A 0 N ( E CL w �� ❑ Q. A U UJ a m U ot5 m N U7 p o F- N 1 d Q O E r y 0 G III Q 4 N O N O aUo add 1?0 �Ul I 51 Z u C til �7 r N sem° m do rn'a r aNr � h °� E n a ONv E ❑I n a_ a o 0 0 N o o }- H N i, IY U m In m O O � L N m m V� m m mmrn N 7+m II U C N W O O 0 0 0 U W m adx 3 T 61 u. ~ m 3 o N Q a o LL. a D a ¢p m a U Q LL. N d p !n L o m U o I r E s m U t V S Q NN Nie E@ U� J 0) 7 E oNo (7 u� E a c R x U U] a LLJ W F Z IV E 0y 0 C N 7 N¢ O N ti IIv O 7 G WWI N -C .0 u vo rn'�n. m o o �� ❑ Q. A C r to o C1 o U7 p o F- aoN m N �o C w CL Om'a adx KH I o qi G7 a 0�U Q 11 � a c a LL rc I � o d °s= O O _h CiN� � N r Ll P V7 I I Q N ►- - u - 01 •� 11 ly O m d o caa 7 do ❑ m � O J w [moi 0 to p r y a O O C p 'M "I Its II � a m a II' NC d 0 (D 1- �❑ 0 > E LL� w o r �'. G _.1 Q. (/l a lE E L r U U) ao�x oQn m =o Q 3 a Q v I� ` w o ' r ri '- 4! ., 'C p il? Q in CL 0 3 I L A C NT - C o m c N F- '1 p IA O CL °�j c c n - 3 d i H o o aU'L E om-0 V m m O a f u s u�icnvia h E� E o J❑ 7 LD V JUC, 2 >z E U 1 . @ U O tl1 oO wr l ao E N o �q o m -N 1 NQS cQ¢ N 7 v � 0 - MON71 T © 0. m 1n eco ,V) Ea U U1 pl'- m Oan �dE oho o m oo m N o - F- G y U�� 0 rnr c�� r y¢ O n_ m o o Too cl m m cD m m 6 V a o Q� o ti-= o v Q E� { maIj j CL 0 x it a oc �o ro m a 0�U Q 11 � a c a LL d °s= O O _h CiN� � N r Ll P V7 I I Q N ly O m d o caa 7 ❑ m � O J w [moi 0 O V1 y O O u II � a m a �❑ 0 > E J U � O w o r (/l a lE E L r U U) ao�x oQn E =o h N1 M ren N o ' r ri '- =VJo a NT - C U uoi, >'L) '13u) u) IA O CL °�j c c n i H Mi 0 [, in N m o ,o 0 Y o J 2 iT u -Zj M7 C w O 0 `m L° CD m a(Dya 'D arc O � aA aS m � u) m u 0 m —44 v mM fit`• l o a o o[ A i C CO C N00 M N ti � C w D1 N 1� J CLO = LL f O N7� L.1.. a 0�U Q a LL °s= O _h CiN� E a L ae u N S tC caa 7 QQ� ovinia M toZ 7 w 0 o o r m n y o 0 0 h N1 M i C CO C N00 M N ti � C w D1 N 1� J CLO = LL f O N7� L.1.. O M O Q CA V Lo 0�0 � O C CD O m c 0 � o � c � q CL ad a I 15 � O N ID 11 x QCL o X Q y � m a x = y 3 o L6 101 O � rn r J > J 1 LI t a � C W U m J 0 0 d 0 0) d c N o � L 10 m 'a -0 Lu N a a T 3 baa ac) p N V � Q s � O Y - F U=S SL. OOO QI N �l N Q' c0 Q, l6 itl R N � � O .� W Q d uml - - 'Aq R V II d.SE oEm d C-1 m II 1N Q oO Oin— U� °poo m _j J �i7 ICS 111 tmO m 7� 00 p a C� S W do UUU QN �n E E aX > C Q m u1 C �OQ O v =0- 1Nw dY M _ y Q rnN2 _ N >> N IIII o O Ud N`� -H f'? 0 �u o G V d)0- a N U"�mUC7U ,m o t (V C UJN tt? ? o a C N N EEEE000 G II II II a } p r V Tm d Q o F-� 'p-0 y -p oG'So UWO a o a Z»7> '"I� NN OOm QX�Y t=t1 t'CIW m 0�J ooh Q +� U 4. - O W �NW W O o j�� O W d RR LJ01UrF-= O r CC W d' d �O,N `� N `?� E EOry (7 ;n �n c, in 1OUp�>0N OaV U V J C N wdgEN N m m 11 II N NN N NmOO�(aj ai+cno Iw �mhi rio aiLNmO o}j-,_. A E a> }> t'�o IV 11111111 ❑N �� �avJ02000 m o_a.` m m 3 o Z`f O N¢ S9U NUr 0ai Q 3 }`V 3o c6 cy mlL N M Yk # U Nmd'� > ik Yk mU ° 11 <? iVaa�i Ovm aU oa a uNJ 6.0-2 �O0 cp-0 Baa O M O N Q CA V Lo 0�0 � O C CD O m c G c � q CL � O N ID 11 x QCL Q IL O L = v co o � rn r a � m• 1v O o m C T E6 o p a 16 Qi add c O ,EE d.SE oEm d C-1 m � d Q oO o m co a II _j Q-• �i7 ICS 111 rn� o JU CL ° a E s J= QN �n E E aX > C Q m W m Id9 Wa rnT �._F, In N W OQQ C C rnN2 _ N >> Jw IIII o O Ud N`� f'? 0 �u G V t G M. N � Uig m n omO C dy � O �m NC N>UJ� 6 O Q u o G II II II a } p r V Tm II II II Q �I a o N Iri vI 'p-0 y -p �LL XII O a`Oiv` ooh odd �� oa �. 0. Q, 2 C C 0 w. 407 NUJJ. f all (W) -u Q CA V Lo 0�0 � O C CD O r G q CL a o x QCL Q IL O L = v co (W) -u O r � CU CY ark � co CI h P illl c E ~V�pp to -r- m �n Iii 0 N ayb o ;o o p o o p y n N o ao c w� a _ ¢ 0 3 d u Q m N Z r(lj© O 7, C A fn V a opo �`miaiv dd' M (n4 a0% Cl j5 y v� h l� h m r O � v` o an.x Y EL .. d o O O R Q M N c. � tm SI Ch O ICI IN N E E T N p u) Q 9 m O o_o o r N y M o u o4 J X777 ❑-`WN OCI mN a W�1 p Up W (n 'O e 0 dl U� CI U N f` C o¢I- y �NTri �� �EE N e r N 0h N� ul-E2 'Ci u O C� E E a « 'C Vmi � VJO nj�n C 66 N a D oo I) nm 3 y�� OU m d 3 Z Cd m E oCl o0 m IL ❑. ro o �, 3 3 c 'om qy y N N off`❑ CL LL ��°�� Ss =m U o > ,u d M O � CU CY ark � illl to -r- lb a Iii 0 N ayb o ;o y U� N o ao c w� a 00 x O Q n o _ O V o f?ON r(lj© Q p opo M (n4 a0% U�� j5 y v� aa a a m r O � v` Iwo} —14 an.x °P 0 p 7 �E C100 CV =O Cp D1 I I m IL C E A �. N N �> Y p tm I U a 16 - N m CL a r� N �¢ a 2 o z ao a U) mom= o U o r0 IA Q O o N O 6i U Oil �o No II •p .�+ II X U N O VIII b MiE lO N �N OI 3R r yo p o}} J M til (�l C � W � � � 3 II � _ c i6 •'P O N o N 3 C o m Uoa� m t 0 fA C p p_ 14 _ y u O1 u ,nom wl w _ 01 U to 0 0, N 1yy1 N m ❑ N C s '^ U II 7 a "EEE mi p J❑ s=77i �n II N xa L c'l LL w'� E v um m E ol-o O mU0 c o foo �m 903 O U 1. MOp G1 Q b ) U 0 UD a C�co fM1M�'C -or61 } O Om C O u�m�� C m'1 G LL - 7,© 'DR®n II Il II II O N N 416 O 0 uj ? NN 7k AU LpU 1�6 o o ' i o�R p { ' adY n- � �Oa- p o tali 22l m aU o 7 W n [L � p r N �E C100 CV =O A �. N N �> Y p tm I U a 16 - CL a r� �¢ a 2 o z ao a U) mom= o U o r0 IA Q 0 Oho o rov G E I=wl Mali 2 Li ax N O W Q1 a Cl p P Y c° P 11 = C >~ r r o N j N 3 u 4 0 N m P a n C% �+ v� Q o Oo N A Q "4 x U J N II 2 n o 0 0 o y II N 7 F C O Ci Q N 0 O d p b U o d m N IF 'a INI of EE E vo.Ca m � C H U ° o v o 7�� .677> v 8 0d IIS, Q o O Kco E2 m m� W Y L L L A N04o 'Z O NO C N a OQr co a � mT[V T 3 r 'gym �N Nm vH �y1 N N C Q P U o m m m .a r C \ IX U f6 a C6 0 02, ap a II IA N Q A O QW W N C O� C� Ui- Ir O Q �. O o N CL Zr 00 3 E � C to a.c7 W N ti I] N W l C3ILn a �c x = o0 CL V) o� o 0 a N _ t o 'q w V7 J ❑ = � D- dv 0 a z co CQn 17 Op U)U) pa U) 4 �0 =O � VAN 'p 9 ai n .. No Ul 0 ¢ m r-m nw o o ami � )•�) �I� adY (sp) —19 c w O $E � v .E x o ro ^ 0 F- 0 o oda m6 E o � N o O N U I "0" II �mm o -o E Ua, 0 II O o Q Lo o� c � E a b latj 14 V d a d o o N N Q 0 0 0 ao d d �Nw 'C � ' 0 0 > 0 (L D y tM•J _ o ��r z roc a �1 3EEE m`o zw' ? �E P 0 0 ~ '7 o y U rn a m� cN'1 M C o .1lC�U y fi s r m t ah Z 2 m A o aO m 00 d Q N O C EL �U Ol Lu W N N � C; O ro � E o o N C c0a. d'4.: LL P 12 obi v cV °it 0 r 01 61 O1 - Om II II II II O I! II Oa � d 3 3 o m E x b v II 9101 Mala 0 0 E ro° o g y d c cp{i, [r a_ LL P c Y E o ro ^ F- 0 o oda m6 E E m o O "0" II �mm o -o E Ua, 0 II O aki k a b v� to p 0 ~ '> � W V 'C � ' 0 0 > o Kir y tM•J o ��r z roc a �1 N WE N m� cN'1 M C .1lC�U L6L6 ui L 2 m A �U Q 3� Lu W d U ro 1! O ro � E o o C c0a. d'4.: LL P AT zO M MM 7 W 0 N U r it N > O i W M d '.0 LO i.� E ig m y ;ateco 0 0 O 4D ♦o^ Cl O V Q 4- d � Y m a c E N — u) a O w m a 0o c? � 3 c U o m O r V) 0 o w °c E n 0 GO fn `O kS a of d W m N 4. 000 cNl_U o Uy b P o t7 @ O o Q o Mali O y a O n I6 @@@ O M 0.4-_ wO dm O mU d'@'' O IyyI N 7 y 0 0 O Cl O 0 d Iti m � Y m a c E N — � 3 o w °c E o fn `O kS a of d W m N 4. 000 cNl_U o Uy b P o t7 WW m O n I6 @@@ O M O wO dm O mU d'@'' O IyyI N 7 C4 0 tiNir; v oNN 77 w 0 t I--. 0 9 0 0 o' O@ x d D d ISI D D N Q to o C3 �o N @ O= J S 0 7- % ij- m �D m m o VI p1 3p VN G O �. N o d= @ p aU Q •-• r�7 O o O N .00 t U c Im t6 c rn 2 N W 11R N 0 O M F m C ly �� Iv IN d o Id O on d Obi ti ff p " N N IC o N pj N.a @)C)1E o O 'nEEEE IIEom (ISd xXk Q _O y U K y 24 Q O N W W U d 0 N z77 7 N i 7i✓II U) W 1u O C o N O O K mrd d7� C L V N N^O N.� �e r EL U Y.O. Q U O Q y Vi E t t O lL Q V �_ @ u) V Ip _ G W� G N O O V CO N Ua U b O fc6 C t, L 7 '7 N d 0 Z O C C N id N !0 N IV O r o Q N G 7 O I,jy = pan G 0 @ II 'ad �+ 9 ti O N N fD NNY N }i E 2 @ Y 0 0 N CI �' O o V C p tG 5. In N CU C O c �� 0. r T t�?00 U} OOO O N O O N, 411 G O O c�h ,�QvU rro+ H (`Q'1 QN V d V /r �VVv @ N� N N LyL d 'E' N N M N C04'N N NN NN d II l7 7 NVin d 0 II d o U u'G c" E 0< a 2 ry Ni.�MO c �� E E �O 3; II)O Id N Co J d ~ V O V OdoQ Odd d 0 4 N N rr r ?� A LLa00 V FOoh U ffi m 0 3.MN G d w c ui ui ui � NNN C C IAC VLL -P, M O V -0 �r 4 IS li 11 11 II �N O CD K dDOO y Orr y00N o1 �O Gu 07v -p ONU �0 Ol Orn yyE 7 @ }i $ O @ O CRT) M 'A Y� C j ik ik 'y ik ik 3fN 11 CL 0 �� al N N N O C N ° O N O 2 0 ac> O > d .� [Lax 000 �5oa�n ��� o CO od v a 0. ID O N V I� N� v 0 0 T !t o E o � m 10Y N V p lol a M� V Q i O U C n m tv W. �. _ W f � W �. 4 J l7 r,,,nrr- vl C7 Q000 o m }i 11 r o � a �n m CL EEE v?qua z�n V m a L a b a J 0 U mi'U b o O 2 CD>7� 3 6 fS��M tm E Wooer z omcaio= 0 cpW= ~ N [ V N N 'N O O Nin14 CQ O N p wy'GTi EN N po iX C o_V)0 N N ONNN �� c� �� V) O W�� �„ TCO y II II II Np 3 N 1} 14 7 K0. 07. N Q O U CL y c 2 ¢ -ulLD 3 3 p m -a u 3k E 1` i�=1 -1A W2 0 an-x N c0a. (Y Cl- ti ❑ a I 6 r CO m E � r m o N 3 v.CV m ?� N•- O'.0 �.. o 0 o m C M a ro �ro�� o Yeo N a SC ivtoLd -a. CD- Q- n ^o C p m MI. O c 1n Iyv C m a fn Im Im 1p m N C N 7 N 11 r U_ _- 1 J❑ 4Y �>7'/ w m r p CM 0 d K K o O m d C, -v r . �wY ID maoo Z 4 Q,(n O O G 4 N N n r N ui b N N r�Ofl .a+ � � UUa�aU �o cm 14N #OV -' a d a pC°mw va5: a n n� n (w) c U 06 CL O p m v = oo'E5mp eo Hca-c amp m IL -.14 2.8 a. (L '^ cc0n_ W41T a F O upi 0 p d N N 3 �r C> Y CO C4 >' O p po o po c m CO 7 o II mc, .c d N o 1 vI�o a C3 ll II .0 � vyi NV o m ai t� Cil a a m ~ r m a m o a m a m 4( yG is J U J • '� 14 II r C4 N r U O p H p I(1 � N O.000 oq N p d" U) LL] N m % W 0 Q � a III ❑ II s d of V ,p, ui a b F d L d Id I� N N^ N 2 N IG ll '^ U La° .c vz V N W° 0 0 ~- N M U N Q T 77> 3 p x�r tai 0. s W Ic N U FY � o m W W p Q 400o Z f, O Q p p, ri C4 C4 p a o N Y C 1 Nom" Ti��i EN N W 11 O U) p d 3 3 o0 O� cNd � ad Tp] 'O sp u ❑ fl II u o lV ma Il} >a � m O > U N U 11 Islam] Malj QUo C X O oT3 E � � o > j aax ccpa �i� a a 0.7 N " II p I� W 6�E9 eaarn w a � Y •y � m o V r y aI� N rn p N E V N b i] a m oN ❑ O� _ Ln U aU'�NNC, r o o a ` ~ U I I n m o U 'Ep N 7 Q J y N N O N N [V CV Ci O p m 4r T - o o ❑ (n LL1 .F. a N u 0a Li IC '6 m V� p N 14 - � - O 11 II II II Q• N N 41 Cl 'E) 'E" E O N ��N.. N` t roll o pN 7-� N ` O 7r tU v �E o h° r j N N dY O V ! J❑ ` O N 3 a n x=" �- mM CL �»» w= E o ooNo z o �=u u 00 OQ Q 3 �2 7 N tO O N n a y N'm MUN v ��V�� gL Om o ! rN NC _ m r�© fA r. y ] u p y L E cV — M V N 11 n D x 0 En 'fl p Ncry r N oiq / w o V• m =ev N ° E` aY ".1 m CL N a rm Q ry o cp N Vxo N U w m MI40 o xa�° u Nf Eo aa, amai C) ilaa col tm3j 0. Z, Y0 cd N 0 m co 0 II cu E N a N 3 a N 11 y t r o is T J U ti• o � ,� o � `o O Q •� N C U ti, o o E >. � timet m o .lmo N N J mU•Z Nle Y ¢ C a� G LN �r r �' 16- is @ i6 0 0- M o ao p 0 d In O LU7 ll.l 7 � O � M ❑ a E 3 o 11 U tm of � . C C, m to II a U IIII m V M JO R i77 � 9 D 0. C 2 Q N 0,4 h KE�r Wcy J 0- m o �tt t LL s o0.aa (V d U1 v` L U CmC G aU o Wa0 m o O 9 N Z C Qa II O m U 0 C y X 1 1 o V 00 e �a l41 C C o N N N 3 O rO Vc' m pUQ UJ m � vo W Ga P Cjrrr -p N N ' uN to LO EN c th nV p Hfnti CQo �' v Jnr' ' ONS a?mrnm c� �U gUd � w +•� (n0 b �NNiV a� C C m N NUJ, ��� 3 C O c V'2�� - -N 'D rt' .o W T im It II IV n O y N N N� N N2 c 6 3 >r' c Q 3 �IISW m r�aV o m Sp - m S o a E - Y U a£ e � m G rr o 0 a. Ka- tL � CL CL O Q �' I]. l.L ❑ p � 0 m co 0 a It o is o O r � � r p o o o o •� C U ti, o o E IV `a C N � mU•Z T ¢ O a� G N is @ i6 0 0- M o ao p 0 d u U n T m 0 U? E of Li a U IC m V M C ly IN ly R N � 9 IG 0. N N 0,4 h m C V J p O O O r yU yam �4 O i aU N E `I CIL N No o V e �a l41 E E rrt o WWW 00 v Z O rO Vc' t � CM N N4 N N N W Ga P Cjrrr -p N N ' uN EN c th nV p Hfnti CQo �' v Jnr' v� Oma -r n mea com gUd � w +•� (n0 b �NNiV 8 c a € ��� V'2�� - -N 'D rt' .o W T im It II IV n O y N N N� c 6 3 >r' -Tjuj bU U o m Sp - m Ua O y v a£ O d0.x P c`Oa Ka- tL ❑ O {O � od v a as fi � {31i v O F Uto E Epip ti M m cq h v m M. m O o II I� L w L M V p O JU JU cN V 1nrn vw� ov 0. x UJv Amo m �� 4Qr 1. 1y O N nIoavv m V N q o o Ct - �1l1© s W fn lr N aCf N N x V 3L 00 :3 A 4 y �In C y it 0�c LL U V u 01� d 01000 ro q - I c, II II I N M C m _ � v, N N � a m n n n � ..�.i� 0 p o ni m W N C LD � N I I C m L m u> IL O tl Q 110 0 ONiNM 1P rNo �NrM 00 0 �r W 1� NN M'V I��<96iN NNM }+ Id O II O .0 A fD 1 T J ep 3 o O ti W s o .0 -mc N CO m r co N o II p N N1 OW��m�Td'6rir0 OU'yU M,J BOO m CL r v d O r i a C1� vi�N iv Q o c m �mriaNM �raom o lymL�t9.a,'z:�aoa 0 p� Vm2 V 0 tri~N to II V o r Im U u Xl' mo w7i �= mm000 0 D odd va C ° m c iaa nui mOE:5 'tC'rJ U Noa m0 ��oa 1Wo L m v 71 ar a �Ar (n �NMI� �M�Yma1 m�M UQV OOfiNR s H tiooEEEE Eao^O1ovi .�fNp ld r 7 N 7> K o O1 O C r 0 0 0 0 '?� y, 6a_W d o voW� �n �+ O»7J y I� ° o «0?3 J V Id U D_ O .v V ry In V y 0 pp.y O' o0o N O 67 V) 45 E C_ ELL �L LLQ R� OO o 00 4 m o 00 0 3 p0. 0 II C OO Q N� 010 _ E E y c r tt1 tt) 0 0) O V 6) �.I E 61 1p 'f1 W O o t7 4 Vi 0 O v6 U O G N N v M= N U N W r c C W w'->`rn�n amNNM C17 cy- (n a (U ANN N ci �'v� 16•--- 3m oo_ a y� o Nuoi,�voi a a 61 N rn N } M r�iM cr'i � r0� OU 110. VVV�� �10 N� 7��NmW 7mO �.Im Olti CN NNNN E'Y a VI ¢ rnruK� Nm p Vo ow C¢� 0 m Q m 'ilnrn(, 6 of ai 1a —0 Wm000 a EE (n u) (nO 11 0 oN N o Nv C a -I O r 17 1 m^v lnmm o�.; iv om 6�0 C 0 E fY In M N 'C a G m l0 0 0 0 Q 0 o O v N .51 7 U V N O •C W d 6) 6) Tm } o II II II II II O } a K d O Q PJ y� Oho3'� p d o0000000 r-: tli m �Q 'w U a rn oo� o Q °� _ tv w o .= r�i r5 v vi tri t- m at N an p 0 C C Q 3. r C cw m E mw NmMMMr:M1+� MmM IDV -U gp O W p � Y } NN NNNNNN NN N 7 Q Q O` .N N 0 0 v E v - r 1U O 6) 6/ ¢ s 1 •C a 050 w dd= no C) CL CO CY uJa n.0 7 o v $E II -M IL C ca I � m o P ? m o a N o Q� N N � - h F� J ❑ II m m L - a J i O d fl ar r o p o N a O � �I. ° Y 3 lyl ❑ � � _ 12 C3 7 J a EIL QL b co Oar r N � N o U n ti T M N 1- '- 0U) a;NN n o - K 0 02. 3 T© II u u O1U VL o o E E ccc I9i�1 Mali n.ax Ii o u� II m ro d v= ea 1 4 •� a ID � 01 10 .. 00 c. N � r Il F- U ❑ oo � :� I ° ❑ o o a p - ; O 0 2 E ELL En 00 cs) O Q r W N N N - rin® u�� E r- < lw F ofex mvv Y�v ! AKN 11 v 11 y a9®la �Nv A S:Smnnmm�n�rYn�� �e a Ilk ate-° o o E c=. E 'C IWI-14m o n M� W o co m r m a c c � a E � o � o m � Q T J O L � a � _VS O O Il N w c N c Q M CL m a �a cn s ao 0 0. ❑ o o o M a N C 0 f � Or= L Q Z77 ,JO 16 W2 y 00 oar Mc�i� m eQo mu'ii �� r h o m M M o � u 00 U o 7 D ten® Il p II ¢ m U � m a�-O ooE E CL r 6 � T x M� W r L a Q- J APPENDIX C W 206111.00Adams. Fairaare FarmsT10 Wa in erQutchessN,91221201. Water Quality Calculations P*.Rv*A WQ'' 12 Where: WQ, = Wafer Quality P 90% Rainfall Event Number (see Figure 4.1) 1 = impervious Cover (Percent) Rv = 0.05 + 0.009 (1) A = site area in acres Posf Drains a Area DA?A 3st urarna a ruea a��, <<. �• WQ' Total Rv P WQ,, (acre-feet) Site Area Pro. Impervious Impervious l (%) (ft) (acres) Area (acres) acres 3.0 0.460 0.46 15.33 0.188 1.1 0.052 2,25 Post Drainage Area DAZA D 22 Site Area Pro. lmpervious 'Total ImperviousL9;167 ) Rv P WQv (acre-feet) WQ„ 3 ( ) (acres) Area(acres) acres 0.875 1.1 0.096 4,193 1.2 1.100 1.10 Post Drainage AreaDASA (DP 3) Site Area Pro. impervious TotalWQ" Impervious I (%) Rv P WQv acre-feet) (ft3) (acres) Area (acres) acres 81.82 0.7864 1.1 0.07g 3,454 0.900 0.90 ram dame acre E " 2[11N: ar (j. <' :; ; Flow Through Structures Sizing kyij ,qk i OAiA DA2A Computation of Modified Curve Number for WQ, rainfall: Runoff Inches T (e�777 950 K7 CN � 1000410+5P+IOQ„—IO(Q,' +1.25 *Q, * F)- =211119 lalui?te.to�za �.a r, 1q t�aBI O(IJ is fo BeTreated W 'y."(k 4�s� Computation of Modified Curve Number for WQ, rainfall: P®€� taij7itS! P nehes i 1 O =17-Q, : A fqr � htfi f C.gtiieh d1iA[ttfRi.:lsrs 0 03 Runoff inches)= 1.017 L q„ (csmlln) = i00a DA4A uiaS2_pe71 �Ytated WQ,(ore�lf R :mtf Computation of Modified Curve Number for WQ, rainfall: fwrf F MCh 11 Q VVQ,.-A _ O N � N E lazU"a •LO f0 O�;'¢ N C 92 V 1.--- 355 0T K L •� CZ. GS d x. Q cr t0 ( pg ��.. CA N GS d x. Q cr i» rE C V a CL a N c L LO C) r° d ` to °a.• e! ` a :" U qm c l cr � O 61 1l- (0 O CO x N (n .0 0) � Cei ° CL 0- ° m ° m o E x c '� �0 `o CO L CL a o Q a vi m a°° o 0 W (C L •L (ii a �[ t11 (6 L Mjo O w m U)n`_�� y y M o cv LL � ol.- O � w 7 ° CO EE f� Z 3 •� 0 N Q '� N`5 CL CL ° O N C tm m O CO� Co � N yU., w f9 (� • U (� U 4 5 C m 7 7 CL � O r +� (/� O L CL CL F E E x •ti Z O N G O 7 d Cn Q 0 d CD Q U CL "°- ul Cn U L C 0 0 0 0 W w C Y U C O L U 0) 0- Q1 C O N .0 O L N f6 :_ Q U C +' F - N OL (6 E III Q/ U w d CL m 46 O O n... U V cc y d O N "`" �� p ,L 3 d� Q�1 y 0` Cl O O O N UG7 U. JJR 0 0- a V-000 ° I CL m .y C]ILG(n00 .`0 •0n n C(n cnZ(nCI)❑❑U1er CL�F-� c I 0 BO1 qw W c Gi E c m Z o d o U c m r (9 E(D O O �. 0 ❑UU7❑UH h C C fn N m ° IL 'a Vi Q m o d Q" � C C -q Qd"L ry N� O O O a c o y +n E- m o T 3 Q o 0 0 caCLL 0.0 41 m a - U d • C�N rO UN4.O aV N or Oac: woO fn2WcL c)❑U1 U U (0 m U N O_ -0 w 0 O C6...: to LO V lA L' 0 La Nor �• � r r � r r r c6 ko 4. X 7� N m N ' � -Dp L L C oo` m-0 ccno0L m y t: iii oF'UF ait cm o]3 d;C i is Ca o ca w � 0 De o ° ID E E E GO 7 .0 L w cC4 U 0 0 0 w E� � i v a s a Bali --Z �-1c HQQG in C W cu Z3 o m m Cz m 0 C7 O +. _ 3 C o U N N Ln LO 0 Lf) LO LI) m � i N r 7 T J 'LL N to 0 Ln Ln L() L() Lo 0 In O 0 0 LJ 0 0 0 0 LL Lo — d O L -atm C` LL1 Q f" Lq J o 1CCC V J C 01 N M M rn LO tb M M M Lq n 0) (� Jw (pcDNNNoo0 0 z : a > LL r F4 u' L U Ci r z p CD o a o 0 0 0 0 a Lf) N N co M CD ro CO U p _ w 0 a � a w ~ - LD (D W 0000000 _ J p 0 F- -W P') M N N M (`') tin LU - J Z c U o T LO NT r T (O to w CO (p O J LL w 111 d d2mCDcowML>toLOLo 1JJ Z r' M r r T r T r T LL a — L N Q N <r r r r N N Q U IV a � Z o °O Q H YU Y Af U U UJ W - N (L> � I- o F- LLI 3o c a m LLu Y p c a c aGi tM t a. a m m ro ro rn rn cnv� 3 3 3 3tY�o- w U Q WLL a{ Ln O N r T T T 1^ N APPENDIX D APPENDIX E OR. TER ,Mr. StormFilter Inspection and Maintenance Procedures `9"iittt Stormfi Maintenance Guidelines The primary purpose of the Stormwater Management StormFilter® is to filter out and prevent pollutants from entering ur waterways. Like any effective filtration system, periodically (-� ase pollutants must be removed to restore the StormFilter to its Tull efficiency and effectiveness. Maintenance requirements and frequency are dependent on the pollutant load characteristics of each site, Maintenance activities may be required in the event of a chemical spill or due to excessive sediment loading from site erosion or extreme storms. It is a good practice to inspect the system after major storm events. Maintenance Procedures Although there are likely many effective maintenance options, we believe the following procedure is efficient and can be implemented using common equipment and existing maintenance protocols. A two step procedure is recommended as follows: 1. Inspection Inspection of the vault interior to determine the need for maintenance. 2. Maintenance Cartridge replacement Sediment removal Inspection and Maintenance Timing �,t least one scheduled inspection should take place per year with 3intenance following as warranted. First, an inspection should be done before the winter season. During the inspection the need for maintenance should be determined and, if disposal during maintenance will be required, samples of the accumulated sediments and media should be obtained. Second, if warranted, a maintenance (replacement of the filter cartridges and removal of accumulated sediments) should be performed during periods of dry weather. In addition to these two activities, it is important to check the condition of the StormFilter unit after major storms for potential damage caused by high flows and for high sediment accumulation that may be caused by localized erosion in the drainage area. It may be necessary to adjust the inspection/ maintenance schedule depending on the actual operating conditions encountered by the system. In general, inspection activities can be conducted at anytime, and maintenance should occur, if warranted, in late summer to early fall when flows into the system are not likely to be present, Maintenance Frequency The primary factor controlling timing of maintenance of the StormFilter is sediment loading. A properly functioning system will remove solids from water by trapping particulates in the porous structure of the filter media inside the cartridges. The flow through the system will naturally decrease as more and more particulates are trapped. Eventually the flow through the cartridges will be low enough to require replacement. It may be possible to extend the usable span of the cartridges by removing sediment from upstream trapping devices on a routine as -needed basis in order to prevent material from being re -suspended and discharged to the StormFilter treatment system. Site conditions greatly influence maintenance requirements. StormFilter units located in areas with erosion or active construction may need to be inspected and maintained more often than those with fully stabilized surface conditions. The maintenance frequency may be adjusted as additional monitoring information becomes available during the inspection program. Areas that develop known problems should be inspected more frequently than areas that demonstrate no problems, particularly after major storms. Ultimately, inspection and maintenance activities should be scheduled based on the historic records and characteristics of an individual StormFilter system or site. It is recommended that the site owner develop a database to properly manage StormFilter inspection and maintenance programs. Prior to the development of the maintenance database, the following maintenance frequencies should be followed: Inspection One time per year After major storms Maintenance As needed, based on results of inspection (The average maintenance lifecycle is approximately 1-3 years) Per Regulatory requirement In the event of a chemical spill Frequencies should be updated as required. The recommended initial frequency for inspection is one time per year. StormFilter units should be inspected after major storms. Sediment removal and cartridge replacement on an as needed basis is recommended unless site conditions warrant. Once an understanding of site characteristics has been established, maintenance may not be needed for one to three ( years, but inspection is warranted and recommended annually. Inspection Procedures The primary goal of an inspection is to assess the condition of the cartridges relative to the level of visual sediment loading as it relates to decreased treatment capacity. It may be desirable to conduct this inspection during a storm to observe the relative flow through the filter cartridges. If the submerged cartridges are severely plugged, then typically large amounts of sediments will be present and very little flow will be discharged from the drainage pipes. If this is the case, then maintenance is warranted and the cartridges need to be replaced. Warning: In the case of a spill, the worker should abort inspection activities until the proper guidance is obtained, Notify the local hazard control agency and CONTLCH Stormwater Solutions immediately. To conduct an inspection: Important: ilnspection, should be performed.by a"person who ., is fam iiar with the opetation and con, rg`uration"of.the 5#ormFil#er treatmertf "unit = " 1. If applicable, set up safety equipment to protect and notify surrounding vehicle and pedestrian traffic. 2. Visually inspect the external condition of the unit and take notes concerning defects/problems. 7, Remove safety equipment. 8, If appropriate, make notes about the local drainage area relative to ongoing construction, erosion problems, or high loading of other materials to the system. 9, Discuss conditions that suggest maintenance and make decision as to weather or not maintenance is needed. Maintenance Decision Tree The need for maintenance is typically based on results of the inspection. The following Maintenance Decision Tree should be used as a general guide, (Other factors, such as Regulatory Requirements, may need to be considered) 1. Sediment loading on the vault floor. a. If >4" of accumulated sediment, maintenance is required. 2. Sediment loading on top of the cartridge. a, If > 1/4" of accumulation, maintenance is required. 3. Submerged cartridges. a, If >4" of static water in the cartridge bay for more that 24 hours after end of rain event, maintenance is required. 4. Plugged media. a. If pore space between media granules is absent, maintenance is required. 5. Bypass condition. a. If inspection is conducted during an average rain fall event and 5tormFilter remains in bypass condition (water over the internal outlet baffle wall or submerged cartridges), maintenance is required. 3. Open the access portals to the vault and allow the system vent. 6, Hazardous material release. 4. Without entering the vault, visually inspect the inside of the a. If hazardous material release (automotive fluids or other) unit, and note accumulations of liquids and solids. is reported, maintenance is required. 5. Be sure to record the level of sediment build-up on the floor of 7. Pronounced scum line. the vault, in the forebay, and on top of the cartridges. If flow a. If pronounced scum line (say ? 1/4" thick) is present is occurring, note the flow of water per drainage pipe. Record above top cap, maintenance is required. all observations. Digital pictures are valuable for historical documentation. 6. Close and fasten the access portals. 8. Calendar Lifecycle. a. If system has not been maintained for 3 years maintenance is required. Assumptions • No rainfall for 24 hours or more • No upstream detention (at least not draining into StormFilter) Structure is online Jutlet pipe is clear of obstruction • Construction bypass is plugged Maintenance Depending on the configuration of the particular system, maintenance personnel will be required to enter the vault to perform the maintenance. Important: If vault entry is required, OSHA rules for confined space entry must be followed. Filter cartridge replacement should occur during dry weather. It may be necessary to plug the filter inlet pipe if base flows is occurring. Replacement cartridges can be delivered to the site or customers facility. Information concerning how to obtain the replacement cartridges is available from CONTECH Stormwater Solutions. Warning'. In the case of a spill, the maintenance personnel should abort maintenance activities until the proper guidance is obtained. Notify the local hazard control agency and CONTECH Stormwater Solutions immediately. To conduct cartridge replacement and sediment rernova4 maintenance: if applicable, set up safety equipment to protect maintenance personnel and pedestrians from site hazards. 2. Visually inspect the external condition of the unit and take notes concerning defects/problems. 3. Open the doors (access portals) to the vault and allow the system to vent. 4. Without entering the vault, give the inside of the unit, including components, a general condition inspection. 5. Make notes about the external and internal condition of the vault. Give particular attention to recording the level of sediment build-up on the floor of the vault, in the forebay, and on top of the internal components. 6. Using appropriate equipment offload the replacement cartridges (up to 150 lbs. each) and set aside. 7. Remove used cartridges from the vault using one of the following methods; Method 1: A. This activity will require that maintenance personnel enter the vault to remove the cartridges from the under drain manifold and place them under the vault opening for lifting (removal). Unscrew (counterclockwise rotations) each filter cartridge from the underdrain connector. Roll the loose cartridge, on edge, to a convenient spot beneath the vault access. Using appropriate hoisting equipment, attach a cable from the boom, crane, or tripod to the loose cartridge. Contact CONTECH Stormwater Solutions for suggested attachment devices. B. Remove the used cartridges (up to 250 lbs, each) from the vault. C. Set the used cartridge aside or load onto the hauling truck. D. Continue steps a through c until all cartridges have been removed, Method 2: A. Enter the vault using appropriate confined space protocols. B. Unscrew the cartridge cap. C. Remove the cartridge hood screws (3) hood and float. D. At location under structure access, tip the cartridge on its side. F. Set the empty, used cartridge aside or load onto the hauling truck. F. Continue steps a through e until all cartridges have been removed. 8. Remove accumulated sediment from the floor of the vault and from the forebay. This can most effectively be accomplished by use of a vacuum truck. 9. Once the sediments are removed, assess the condition of the vault and the condition of the connectors. The connectors are short sections of 2 -inch schedule 40 PVC, or threaded schedule 80 PVC that should protrude about 1 ° above the floor of the vault. Lightly wash down the vault interior. a. If desired, apply a light coating of FDA approved silicon lube to the outside of the exposed portion of the connectors. This ensures a watertight connection between the cartridge and the drainage pipe. b. Replace any damaged connectors. 10. Using the vacuum truck boom, crane, or tripod, lower and ( install the new cartridges. Once again, take care not to damage connections. 11. Close and fasten the door. 12. Remove safety equipment. 13. Finally, dispose of the accumulated materials In accordance with applicable regulations. Make arrangements to return the used empty cartridges to CONTFCH Stormwater Solutions. Related Maintenance Activities - Performed on an as -needed basis StormFilter units are often just one of many structures in a more r-mprehensive stormwater drainage and treatment system, w order for maintenance of the StormFilter to be successful, it is imperative that all other components be properly maintained. The maintenance/repair of upstream facilities should be carried out prior to StormFilter maintenance activities. In addition to considering upstream facilities,. it is also important to correct any problems identified in the drainage area. Drainage area concerns may include: erosion problems, heavy oil loading, and discharges of inappropriate materials. Material Disposal The accumulated sediment found in stormwater treatment and conveyance systems must be handled and disposed of in accordance with regulatory protocols. It is possible for sediments to contain measurable concentrations of heavy metals and organic chemicals (such as pesticides and petroleum products). Areas with the greatest potential for high pollutant loading include industrial areas and heavily traveled roads. Sediments and water must be disposed of in accordance with all applicable waste disposal regulations. When scheduling maintenance, consideration must be made for the disposal of solid and liquid wastes. This typically requires coordination with a local landfill for solid waste disposal. For liquid waste disposal a number of options are available including a municipal vacuum truck decant facility, local waste water treatment plant or on-site treatment and discharge. ILOA'♦ RECYCLEb PAPER LUMONC 800.925.5240 contechstormwater.com Support • Drawings and specifications are available at contechstormwater.com. • Site-specific design support is available from our engineers, ©2007 CONTECH stormwater Solutions CONTECH Construction Products Inc. provides site solutions for the civil engineering industry. CONTECH's portfolio includes hridges, drainage, sanitary sewer, stormwater and earth stabilization products, For information on other CONTECH division `erings, visit contech-cpi.com or call 800.338.1 122 Nothing in this catalog should be construed as an expressed warranty or an implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. See the CONTECH standard quotation or acknowledgement for applicable warranties and other terms and conditions of sale. Date:. Personnel: Location: System Size: System Type: Vault ❑ Cast -In -Place ❑ Linear Catch Basin ❑ Manhole ❑ Other ❑ Sediment Thickness in Forebay: Date: Sediment Depth on Vault Floor: Structural Damage: Estimated Flow from Drainage Pipes (if available): Cartridges Submerged: Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth of Standing Water: Storm Filter Maintenance Activities (check off if done and give description) ❑ Trash and Debris Removal: ❑ Minor Structural Repairs: ❑ Drainage Area Report Excessive Oil Loading: Yes ❑ No Source: Sediment Accumulation on Pavement: Yes ❑ No ❑ Source: Erosion of Landscaped Areas: Yes ❑ No ❑ Source: Items Needing Further Work: Owners should contact the local public works department and inquire about how the department disposes of their street waste residuals, Other Comments: Review the condition reports from the previous inspection visits mormFiner ruaintenance6eportI i ff' lY _. Personnel: ,,Location: System Size: i System Type: Vault ❑ Cast -In -Place ❑ Linear Catch Basin ❑ Manhole ❑ Other ❑ I!I List Safety Procedures and Equipment Used: i System Observations i� f Months in Service: Oil in Forebay: Yes ❑ No ❑ Sediment Depth in Forebay: _ Sediment Depth on Vault Floor: Structural Damage: Drainage Area Report FxcessW Oil Loading: Yes ❑ No ❑ Source: "°Hent Accumulation on Pavement: Yes ❑ No ❑ Source: t husion of Landscaped Areas: Yes ❑ No ❑ Source: StormFilter Cartridge Replacement Maintenance Activities Remove Trash and Debris: Yes ❑ No ❑ Details: Replace Cartridges: Yes ❑ No ❑ Details: Sediment Removed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Details: Quantity of Sediment Removed (estimate?): Minor Structural Repairs: Yes ❑ No ❑ Details: Residuals (debris, sediment) Disposal Methods Notes: F 113 i5^n :DY _ TFCNMOIpGIFS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES For the CONTINUOUS DEFLECTIVE SEPARATION UNIT INTRODUCTION The CDS unit is an important and effective component of your storm water management program and proper operation and maintenance of the unit are essential to demonstrate your compliance with local, state and federal water pollution control requirements. The CDS technology features a patented non -blocking, indirect screening technique developed in Australia to treat water runoff. The unit is highly effective in the capture of suspended solids, fine sands and larger particles. Because of its non -blocking screening capacity, the CDS unit is un -matched in its ability to capture and retain gross pollutants such as trash and debris. In short, CDS units capture a very wide range of organic and in -organic solids and pollutants. that typically result in tons of captured solids each year: total suspended solids (TSS), sediments, oil and greases and captured trash and debris (including floatables, neutrally buoyant, and negatively buoyant debris) under very high flow rate conditions. OPERATIONS The CDS unit is a non-mechanical self-operating system and will function any time there is flow in the storm drainage system. The unit will continue to effectively capture pollutants in flows up to the design capacity even during extreme rainfall events when the design capacity may be exceeded. Pollutants captured in the CDS unit's separation chamber and sump will be retained even when the unit's design capacity is exceeded. CDS CLEANOUT The frequency of cleaning the CDS unit will depend upon the generation of trash and debris and sediments in your application. Cleanout and preventive maintenance schedules will be determined based on operating experience unless precise pollutant loadings have been determined. The unit should be periodically inspected to determine the amount of accumulated pollutants and to ensure that the cleanout frequency is adequate to handle the predicted pollutant load being processed by the CDS unit. The recommended cleanout of solids within the CDS unit's sump should occur at 75% of the sump capacity. However, the sump may be completely full with no impact to the CDS unit's performance. Access to the CDS unit is typically achieved through two manhole access covers — one allows inspection and cleanout of the separation chamber (screen/cylinder) & sump and another allows inspection and cleanout of sediment captured and retained behind the screen. The PSW & PSWC off-line models have an additional access cover over the weir of the diversion vault. However, for the units installed on the W5 Projects access is initially through a double door hatch followed by a Pressure Hatch, Refer to pressure relief instructions prior to attempting access. For units possessing a sizable depth below grade (depth to pipe), a single manhole access point would allow both sump cleanout and access behind the screen. CDS Technologies Recommends The Fallowing: NEW INSTALLATIONS — Check the condition of the unit after every runoff event for the first 30 days, The visual inspection should ascertain that the unit is functioning properly (no blockages or obstructions to inlet and/or separation screen), measuring the amount of solid materials that have accumulated in the sump, the amount of fine sediment accumulated behind the screen, and determining the amount floating trash and debris in the separation chamber. This can be done with a calibrated "dip stick" so that the depth of deposition can be tracked. Schedules for inspections and cleanout should be based on storm events and pollutant accumulation. ONGOING OPERATION — During the rainfall season, the unit should be inspected at least once every 30 days. The floatables should be removed and the sump cleaned when the sump is 75-85% full. If floatables accumulate more rapidly than the settleable solids, the floatables should be removed using a vactor truck or dip net before the layer thickness exceeds one to two feet. Cleanout of the CDS unit at the end of a rainfall season is recommended because of the nature of pollutants collected and the potential for odor generation from the decomposition of material collected and retained. This end of season cleanout will assist in preventing the discharge of pore water from the CDS' unit during periods of low rainfall. USE OF SORBENTS — It needs to be emphasized that the addition of sorbents is not a requirement for CDS units to effectively control oil and grease from storm water. The conventional oil baffle within a unit assures satisfactory oil and grease removal. However, the addition of sorbents is a unique enhancement capability special to CDS units, enabling increased oil and grease capture efficiencies beyond that obtainable by conventional oil baffle systems. Under normal operations, CDS units will provide effluent concentrations of oil and grease that are less than 15 parts per million (ppm) for all dry weather spills where the volume is less than or equal to the spill capture volume of the CDS unit. During wet weather flows, the oil baffle system can be expected to remove between 40 and 70% of the free oil and grease from the storm water runoff. CDS Technologies only recommends the addition of sorbents to the separation chamber if there are specific land use activities in the catchment watershed that could produce exceptionally large concentrations of oil and grease in the runoff, concentration levels well above typical amounts. If site evaluations merit an increased control of free oil and grease then oil sorbents can be added to the CDS unit to thoroughly address these particular pollutants of concern. Recommended Oil Sorhents �? v�cNrto�o�i€s RubberizerO Particulate 8-4 mesh or OARS"m Particulate for Filtration, HPT4100 or equal. Rubberizer® is supplied by Haz-Mat Response Technologies, Inc. 4626 Santa Fe Street, San Diego, CA 92109 (800) 542-3036. OARSTM is supplied by AbTech Industries, 4110 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 235, Scottsdale, AZ 85251 (800) 545-8999. The amount of sorbent to be added to the CDS separation chamber can be determined if sufficient information is known about the concentration of oil and grease in the runoff. Frequently the actual concentrations of oil and grease are too variable and the amount to be added and frequency of cleaning will be determined by periodic observation of the sorbent. As an initial application, CDS recommends that approximately 4 to 8 pounds of sorbent material be added to the separation chamber of the CDS units per acre of parking lot or road surface per year. Typically this amount of sorbent results in a 1/2 inch to one (1") inch depth of sorbent material on the liquid surface of the separation chamber. The oil and grease loading of the sorbent material should be observed after major storm events. Oil Sorbent material may also be furnished in pillow or boom configurations. The sorbent material should be replaced when it is fully discolored by skimming the sorbent from the surface. The sorbent may require disposal as a special or hazardous waste, but will depend on local and state regulatory requirements. CLEANOUT AND DISPOSAL — A vactor truck is recommended for cleanout of the CDS unit and can be easily accomplished in less than 30-40 minutes for most installations. Standard vactor operations should be employed in the cleanout of the CDS unit. Disposal of material from the CDS unit should be in accordance with the local municipality's requirements. Disposal of the decant material to a POTW is recommended. Field decanting to the storm drainage system is not recommended. Solids can be disposed of in a similar fashion as those materials collected from street sweeping operations and catch -basin cleanouts. MAINTENANCE The CDS unit should be pumped down at least once a year and a thorough inspection of the separation chamber (inlet/cylinder and separation screen) and oil baffle performed. The unit's internal components should not show any signs of damage or any loosening of the bolts used to fasten the various components to the manhole structure and to each other. Ideally, the screen should be powerwashed for the inspection. If any of the internal components is damaged or if any fasteners appear to be damaged or missing, please contact CDS Technologies to make arrangements to have the damaged items repaired or replaced: CDS Technologies, Inc. Phone; (410) 620-0933 307 N. Bridge Street, Suite 3 Fax: (410) 620-1250 Elkton, MD 21921 ��°� Tecar�xc�iks The screen assembly is fabricated from Type 316 stainless steel and fastened with Type 316 stainless steel fasteners that are easily removed and/or replaced with conventional hand tools. The damaged screen assembly should be replaced with the new screen assembly placed in the same orientation as the one that was removed. CONFINED SPACE The CDS unit is a confined space environment and only properly trained personnel possessing the necessary safety equipment should enter the unit to perform maintenance or inspection procedures. Inspections of the internal components can, in most cases, be accomplished through observations from the ground surface. RECORDS OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CDS Technologies recommends that the owner maintain annual records of the operation and maintenance of -the CDS unit to document the effective maintenance of this important component of your storm water management program. The attached Annual Record of Operations and Maintenance form is suggested and should be retained for a minimum period of three years. TKFjNpl0G1FS CDS TECHNOLOGIES ANNUALRECORD OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OWNER ADDRESS OWNER REPRESENTATIVE PHONE CDS INSTALLATION: MODEL DESIGNATION PMSU20 20 DATE SITE LOCATION DEPTH FROM COVER TO BOTTOM OF SUMP VOLUME OF SUMP 1.1 CUYD VOLUME/INCH DEPTH CUYD INSPECTIONS: DATEIINSPECTOR SCREEN INTEGRITY FLOATABLES DEPTH SEDIMENT VOLUME SORBENT DISCOLORATION OBSERVATIONS OF FUNCTION: CLEANOUT: DATE VOLUME FLOATABLES VOLUME SEDIMENTS METHOD OF DISPOSAL OF FLOATABLES, SEDIMENTS, DECANT AND SORBENTS OBSERVATIONS: SCREEN MAINTENANCE: DATE OF POWER WASHING, INSPECTION AND OBSERVATIONS: CERTIFICATION: TITLE: DATE: 51-ORNTNA TER, "��� ,� ­ "90LUTIONI,�, Inspection & Maintenance Guide for Corrugated Steel Pipe Underground Detention Systems Safety: Before entering into any storm sewer or underground detention system check to make sure all OSHA and local safety regulations and guidelines are observed during the maintenance process. Hard hats, safety glasses, steel -toed boots and any other appropriate personal protective equipment shall be worn at all times. Frequency: Inspections shall be completed annually. Inspection Check List: 4 Check quafty of parking lot surface. • Is there evidence of potholes or sinkholes? • Is there evidence of an unusual amount of silt and soil build-up on the surface? Check for pipe symmetry (uniform curvature). • Flexible steel pipe is designed to handle minor deflections. Pipe structures deflected more than 7% from design shape, or those that show localized distortions may require further investigation. Check for gine 'oint quality. • Is there evidence of backfill material infiltrating into the pipe structure? Check for proper operation of outlet structure. • Is the outlet drainpipe clogged? • In dry conditions, has the system drained to the elevation of the lowest outlet pipe. f Silt Deposition • If accumulated silt is interfering with the operation of the detention system (i.e.: blocking outlet pipe or if silt deposition has significantly reduced the storage capacity of the system) it should be removed. This can be accomplished by the use of a "clam shell" device or vactor truck. i Stormwater Pond/Wetland Operation, Maintenance and Management Inspection Checklist Project Location: Site Status: pate: Time: Inspector: Maintenance Item Satisfactoryl Unsatisfactory Comments 1. Embankment and emergency spillway (Annual, After Major Storms) 1. Vegetation and ground cover adequate 2. Embankment erosion, 3. Animal burrows 4. Unauthorized planting 5. Cracking, bulging, or sliding of dam a. Upstream face b. Downstream face c. At or beyond toe downstream upstream d. Emergency spillway 6.Pond, toe & chimney drains clear and functioning 7.Seepslleeks on downstream face 8.Slope protection or riprap failure 9. Vertical/horizontal alignment of top of dam "As -Built' G -'t New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ CommentsComments 10. Emergency spillway clear of obstructions and debris 11. Other (specify) 2, )user and principal spillway (Annual) Type: Reinforced concrete Corrugated pipe Masonry 1. Low flow orifice obstructed 2. Low flow trash rack. a. Debris removal necessary b. Corrosion control 3. Weir trash rack maintenance a. Debris removal necessary b. corrosion control 4. Excessive sediment accumulation insider riser 5. Concrete/masonry condition riser and barrels a. cracks or displacement b. Minor spalling (<1" } c. Major spalling (rebars exposed) d. Joint failures e. Water tightness 6, Metal pipe condition 7. Control valve a. Operation allexercised b. Chained and locked 8. Pond drain valve a. Operational/exercised b. Chained and locked 9. Outfall channels functioning 10. Other (specify) G-2 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ Unsatisfactory Comments 3.• Permanent Pool (Wet Ponds) (monthly) 1. Undesirable vegetative growth 3. Undesirable woody vegetation 2. Floating or floatabfe debris removal required 4. Low flow channels clear of obstructions 3. Visible pollution 5. Standing water or wet spots 4. Shoreline problem 6. Sediment and 1 or trash accumulation 5, Other (specify) 7. Other (specify) 4, Sediment Forebays 1,Sedimentation noted 2. Sediment cleanout when depth < 50% design depth 5. Dry Pond Areas 1. Vegetation adequate 2. Undesirable vegetative growth 3. Undesirable woody vegetation 4. Low flow channels clear of obstructions 5. Standing water or wet spots 6. Sediment and 1 or trash accumulation 7. Other (specify) 6. Condition of Outfalls (Annual, After Major Storms) 1. Riprap failures 2. Slope erosion 3. Storm drain pipes 4.Endwalls I Headwalls 5. Other (specify) 7. Other ( Monthly) 1. Encroachment on pond, wetland or easement area G-3 , New York State Stormwater Management Design'Manual Appendix G Maintenance Item Satisfactory/ Comments Comments 2. Complaints from residents 3,Aesthetics a. Grass growing required b. Graffiti removal needed c. Other (specify) 4. Conditions of maintenance access routes. 5. Signs of hydrocarbon build-up 6. Any public hazards (specify) 8. Wetland Vegetation (Annual) 1. Vegetation healthy and growing Wetland maintaining 50% surface area coverage of wetland plants after the second growing season. (If unsatisfactory, reinforcement plantings needed) 2. Dominant wetland plants: Survival of desired wetland plant species Distribution according to landscaping plan? 3. Evidence of invasive species 4. Maintenance of adequate water depths for desired wetland plant species 5. Harvesting of emergent plantings needed 6..Have sediment accumulations reduced pool volume significantly or are plants "choked" with sediment 7. Eutrophication level of the wetland. 8. Other (specify) Comments: G-4 New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual Appendix G Actions to be Taken; G-5