1979-07-09 RGMAGENDA
TC WN BOARD
TOWN OF WAPPINGER
JULY 9, 1979
1. SUPERVISOR CALL MEETING -TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. ACCEPT MINUTES ,)( =Lc
4. REPORTS OF OFFICERS
Town Justices (May &—e)
H. Supt. Hydrant Report
5. RESOLUTIONS
1\'.R-4-1 .l L - l4- 1 Z - - { "i i •i
u ( !
Receiver of Taxes Bldg &--Zn.g.
a. Zoning Ordinance & Map proposed revision
b. Central Hudson Lighting District Contracts (Gen. Twn, Chelsea
& Hughsonville)
c. Salvage Yard License application - A & J Parsons (New)
d. M. Ryan request for Transfers:
1. F.P. Clark Associates
2. Publishing Zng. Ord. for P.H.
3. Budget Shortfall - heating fuel - Highway garage
e. Planning Bd. recommendation to call bond for Serenity Mission Rd.
f. Resolution of intent - Texaco - Oil & Hazardous Substances
Spill Committee
g. Bids for sale of 1971 Toyota (Old Patrol Car)
�l• M.'ky4n Ce . 1.a\\ trees w6 n.,fenci.4utes
• � ern. Pollv'n/ Places
6. REPORTS OF COMiMITTEES
7. PETITIONS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. City of Poughkeepsie re: enlisting support for operating Ski
Facility at College Hill
B. R. E. Lapar re: CWW Imp. Water Survey (Heath) -authorize
payment of Voucher, & Recommendation to repair leaks.
C. Judy Crawford re: Block Party in Quiet Acres
D. E. Hawksley request increase in pay for CAC Secretary
E. Rezoning Request by Sheraton Enterprises, Inc. (Rte 9 &
Osborne Hill property.
�• �• G�Y.decvc� c e�; Cas tb5cAgtQ; \\(
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. R. E. Lapar re: (1) Castle Point Recreation Area (2) Stream
Cleaning Report ,
b. H. Gunderud Memo re: R.E. Lapar memo on Placement of Water
Meters
c. W. Horton recommendation on Scofield Dev. Call Bond
ci • Zec, � Y -3c.‘ l.eed to kzecarv.a.Ae_nan;\'to w.ldwiesel - 0.11pro44.1,
9. NEW BUSINESS
l
10. ADJOURNMENT
1179
The regular meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger was
held on July 9, 1979 at To Hall, Mill Street, Village of Wappingers
Falls, Dutchess County, New York.
Supervisor Diehl opened the meeting at 8:11 P.M.
Present:
Louis Diehl, Supervisor
Leif Jensen, Councilman
Nicholas Johnson, Councilman
Bernice Mills, Councilwoman
Janet Reilly, Councilwoman
Elaine Snowden, Town Clerk
Others Present:
Jon H. Adams, Attorney
William Horton, Highway Superintendent
Rudolph Lapar, Engineer to the Town
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 11, 1979 and the Special
Meetings of May 24, May 29, June 4 and June 6, 1979, having been
previuu .ly 'sent to the Town Board, were now placed before them for
their consideration.
MRS. REILLY moved that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 11,
1979 and the Special Meetings of May 24, May 29, June 4 and June 6,
1979, be and they _ar.e ,he:dby4pproved, as submitted by the Town Clerk.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen
Motion Unanimously Carried
Reports were received for the month of May from Town Justices, for
the month of June from the Receiver of Taxes, the Building Inspector
and the Highway Superintendent's Hydrant Report.
Mr. Johnson had a few questions on some of the items on the Hydrant
Report and Mr. Horton explained them to his satisfaction.
MR. JOHNSON moved that the reports be accepted and placed on file.
Seconded by Mrs. Mills
Motion Unanimously Carried
A Public Hearing having been held on the proposed Zoning Ordinance
and Map by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger on June 26th,
1979, the matter was now placed before them for their consideration.
The following resolution was moved by COUNCILMAN JOHNSON who moved
its adoption:
aril
BE IT RESOLVED that the following Negative Declaration
Environmental Significance be adopted:
(attached hereto and made part thereof of the Minutes of
this Meeting).
Seconded by: Councilwoman Reilly
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
The following Resolution was °#f by COUNCILMAN JOHNSON who
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, a motion was made at a prior meeting of the
Town Board of the Town of Wappinger that the zoning ordinance
and zoning map be introduced and that a public hearing be held
thereon, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 239-m of the General Municipal
Law, the proposed amendment to the nap and ordinance was referred
to theDutchess County Planning Department, and
WHEREAS, by letter dated the 25th day of June 1979, the
Dutchess County Planning Department has recommended disapproval
of certain portions of the amendment, and
WHEREAS, a motion has been made that the zoning map and
ordinance be amended,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the zoning map and
zoning ordinance amendment as attached hereto be and is hereby
adopted, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to the provision of
General Municipal Law Section 239-m, approval to the said amend-
ment is granted for the following reasons:
1. The disapproval expressed by the county planning agency
is only addressed at commercially zoned areas. The factual premises
supporting the conclusions so expressed fail to consider actual
land use patterns in such areas.
2. The county planning agency has failed to consider the
legitimate expectations of land owners in commercial zones that
such land will continue to be used as such.
3. The fear expressed that zoning map will result in excess
eommercial development fails to take into consideration the operation
of competitive factors that will limit commercial development to the
actual demands of the market place. Commercial zones should not be
so limited as to hamper the free operation of those forces.
4. The county planning agency has not recommended.itsapproval
of the entire zoning text and map but only portions thereof. It
has commented favorably with respect to other portions. As the
recommendation does not address the proposed ordinance in its
entirety, it is questionable whether the negative portions alone
are a disapproval within the contemplation of General Municipal
Law Section 239-m.
5. Because of the expenses associated with the adoption of
zoning ordinances, adoption of the proposed comprehensive ordinance
and map, and the further study of the specific disapprovals will
better serve the best interests of town residents. If after study,
modification is warranted, the same can be accomplished by subsequent
legislation.
1 1'8>
6. The present zoning ordinance is sixteen years old
and is outdated. Further delay is not warranted in the adoption
of a new comprehensive ordinance.
Seconded by: Councilwoman Reilly
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
The following Resolution was offered by COUNCILMAN JOHNSON who
moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED by the Town Board of the Town
of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, in pursuance of the
authority conferred by the laws of the State of New York that
the following Town of Wappinger Comprehensive Revised Zoning
Ordinance and Map be adopted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Ordinance shall become
effective immediately upon adoption, posting and publication as
prescribed by Town Law.
(Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map attached hereto and made part
thereof of the Minutes of this Meeting).
Seconded by: Councilwoman Reilly
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
Before the vote was taken on the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance, Mr. Incoronato, being recognized by
the Chair, asked who was consulted on this declaration, where did
the input come from; did the planning consultants approve this,
was there a letter from the planning consultant, was their any
correspondence to support this negative statement; where was the
planning consultant's name on the statement: Mr. Diehl informed
him that the Attorney to the Town forwarded this declaration to
the Board and it had been compiled by the planning consultants
and the Attorney; it did not have to be signed, it needed Town
Board approval.
Mr. Johnson, speaking further on the Zoning Ordinance, remarked
that at the public hearing they had received a number of questions,
requests to look into certain aspects and problems that had arisen.
This has not been forgotten, they will be addressed, there will be
corrections, deletions, technical reviews at a later date.
The following Ordinance was introduced by COUNCILMAN JENSEN:
An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the
Town of Wappinger.
q'182
BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
as follows:
The Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map adopted by the Town
Board of the Town of Wappinger on July 9, 1979, is amended as
follows:
Section 1. The land owned by Chelsea Ridge Associates,
described on the Tax map of the Town of Wappinger as grid no.
6056-02-635539 be rezoned to NB zone.
Section 2. The lands owned by Chemical Bank, Jack Davis,
and Power Test described on the Tax Map of the Town of Wappinger
as grid nos. 6157-02-610920, 6157-02-604953, and 6157-02-578955
be rezoned as HB -1A.
Section 3. That all lands as shown on the Tax Map of the
Town of Wappinger presently zoned R-20, and being between Osborne
Hill Road and Fowlerhouse Road as follows to a depth of 300 feet
on both sides of Route 9 only, be rezoned HB -2A:
Tax Grid No.
Owner
6157-04-599136 Sheraton
6157-04-600170 Dominicus
6157-04-590180 Cohen
6157-04-582220 Posar
6157-04-743178 Heimburger
6157-04-636239 Horton
6157-04-639251 Parkton
6157-04-648271 Taranto
6157-04-627257 Tornatore
Section 4. That all lands as shown on the Tax Map of the
Town of Wappinger presently zoned OR -10A on the easterly side of
Route 9, South of Old Hopewell Road as follows to a depth of 300 ft.
on the cast side of Route 9 be rezoned HB -2A.
Tax Grid No.
6157-02-641504
6157-04-604495
6157-04-603472
6157-04-638394
6157-04-633424
6157-04-623465
6157-04-618490
Owner
Huang
Sokol
Knight
Shen
Emerald Renovators
D'Ambrosio
Palmatier
Section 5. That all lands as shown on the Tax Map of the
Town of Wappinger presently zoned Or -10A on the easterly side of
Route 9, South of Old Hopewell Road described on the Tax Map of
the Town of Wappinger as grid nos. 6157-02-637535, 6157-02-659528,
and 6157-02-684525 owned by Tomasic, P&D Tree Experts, and David
and Patricia Roger respectively, and the remaining portions of
those properties presently zoned Or -10A on the easterly side of
Route 9, South of Old Hopewell Road described on the Tax Map of
the Town of Wappinger as grid nos. 6157-02-641504, 6157-04-618490,
6157-04-623465, 6157-04-633424, and 6157-04-638394, owned respective-
ly by Huang, Palmatier, D'Ambrosio, Emerald Renovators, and Shen,
be rezoned to OR -1A.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective as
prescribed by Town Law Section 265.
The following resolution was introduced by COUNCILMAN JENSEN
who moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, there has been introduced, an Ordinance Amending
the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the Town of Wappinger,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Public Hearing shall
be held on the 30th day of July, 1979 at 8:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight
Timm, at Tow2f Hall, Mill Street, Village of Wappingers Falls,
1
1
Dutchess County, New York.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Clerk shall give
notice of said Public Hearing as provided by Law.
Seconded by: Mrs. Mills
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
Mr. Versace, being recognized by the Chair, asked if the Board
was also taking into consideration recommendations made by the
residents who were present at the public hearing held on the
Zoning Ordinance on June 26th ---such as the CB'ers, were they
now in violation due to the height of their antennas.
Mr. Johnson answered that they were investigating this and other
problems --this could be a non -conforming use. It would take time,
he said, but all problems would be addressed.
The following resolution was offered by COUNCILMAN JENSEN, who
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, all agreements with the Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation for lighting the streets and highways in the Chelsea
Lighting District has been terminated on July 9, 1979 and,
WHEREAS, the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation has
submitted a new agreement for lighting said streets and highways
subsequent to that date,
NOW, TIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the new agreement dated
June 1, 1979 as submitted by the Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation be and is hereby approved, and it is further
RESOLVED that Supervisor Louis D. Diehl be and is hereby
authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the Town of
Wappinger.
Seconded by: Councilman Johnson
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
The following resolution was offered by COUNCILMAN JENSEN who
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, all agreements with the Central Hudson Gas &
Electric Obrporation for lighting the streets and highways in
the Hughsonville Lighting District has been terminated on July 9,
1979 and
WHEREAS, the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation has
submitted a new agreement for lighting said streets and highways
subsequent to that date,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the new agreement dated
June 1, 1979, as submitted by the Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation be and is hereby approved, and it is further
RESOLVED, that Supervisor Diehl be and is hereby authorized
to execute said agreement on behalf of the Town of Wappinger.
Seconded by: Councilman Johnson
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
b
84
The following resolution was offered by COUNCILMAN JENSEN who
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, all agreements with the Central Hudson Gas &
Electric Cbrporation for lighting the streets and highways in
the Town of Wappinger (General Town Charge) has been terminated
on July 9, 1979 and,
WHEREAS, the Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation has
submitted a new agreement for lighting said streets and highways
subsequent to that date,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the new agreement dated
June 1, 1979 as submitted by the Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Corporation be and is hereby approved, and it is further
RESOLVED, that Supervisor Diehl be and is hereby authorized
to execute said Agreement on behalf of the Town of Wappinger.
Seconded by: Councilman Johnson
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
An application for a Salvage Dealer's License had been received
from Arthur Leiberman (formerly J & B Parsons Inc.). This had
been reviewed by Hans Gunderud, Zoning Administrator who had
required additional information. A second letter was received
from Mr. Gunderud stating that he was now satisfied that the
revised site plan and proof of ownership, as submitted by Mr.
Rahemba, attorney for Mr. Leiberman, met all essential zoning
requirements for issuance of a license to operate a legally
non -conforming salvage yard at the previous J & B Parsons Inc.
site.
MR. JENSEN moved that the Town Clerk be directed to issue a
Salvage Yard License to Arthur Leiberman, as recommended by the
Zoning Administrator.
Seconded by Mr. Johnson
Roll Call Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays
Three memos were received from Mr. Ryan, Comptroller requesting
transfers as follows:
Memo To: Town Board
From: Matthew W. Ryan, Comptroller
Date: June 13, 1979
Subject: F.P. Clark Associates
I have received, this date, a bill from Clark Associates
for work on the new proposed Zoning Ordinances.
If this is acceptable, please approve a transfer from
B1990.4 Contingency to B8020.4 Planning Contractual in the
amount of $884.50.
MR. JOHNSON moved to approve transfer for F. P. Clark Associates
in the amount;pf $884.50 from B1990.4 Contingency to B8020.4
0
118 5
Planning Contractual, as requested by the Comptroller.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Memo To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Motion Unanimously Carried
Town Board
Matthew W. Ryan, Comptroller
June 20, 1979
Additional Transfer
Enclosed please find a copy of the bill for publishing
the revised Zoning Ordinance. At the present rate of normal
legal ads we will expend all allocated funds in this budget
line item.
Therefore, please transfer $3,084 from B1990.4 Contingency
To B6410.4 Printing and Advertising Contractual.
MR. JOHNSON moved to approve transfer $3,084.00 from B1990.4
Contingency to B6410.4 Printing and Advertising Contractual,
as requested by the Comptroller.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Memo To:
From:
DAte:
Subject:
Motion Unanimously Carried
Town Board Members
Matthew W. Ryan, Comptroller
June 26, 1979
Budget Shortfalls
The budget item for the highway garage is rapidly
approaching zero. The adopted budget calls for an annual
expenditure for heating fuel, etc. of $7,500. To date, we
have spent $7,333.44 on fuel alone!! We will need, in the
near future, a transfer to cover overexpenditures.
Due to the low contingency fund balance, I recommend
a transfer of $2,500 from A1990.4 to A5132.4 Garage Contractual.
MR. JENSEN moved that the transfer be approved in the amount of
$2,500.00 from A1990.4 to A5132.4 Garage Contractual, as requested
by the Comptroller.
Seconded by Mrs. Mills
The following letter was received:
Motion Unanimously Carried
June 19th, 1979
Toun Board Members
Town of Wappinger
Town Hall -Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
Re: Serenity Mission Subdivision -Completion of Roads Within
the Subdivision.
Dear Board Members:
This letter is to advise you that the Planning Board
refuses to grant any further extensions for eompletion of
the roads within this subdivision.
In view of this, the Board would like to suggest that
immediate steps be taken to call the bond.
It would be most appreciated if you would advise the
Planning Board of any action you may take regarding this
matter.
Respectfully yours,
s/ Betty -Ann Russ, Secrettary
T/W Planning Board
MRS. MILLS moved that the bond be called on Serenity Mission 41/
and the Attorney to the Town be empowered to take the steps
necessary for this action.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Motion Unanimously Carried
Two bids were received for the 1971 Toyota Sedan owned by the
Town; one from John Vorndran in the amount of $125.00, one from
Thomas Coughlin in the amount of $80.00.
SUPERVISOR DIEHL moved that the 1971 Toyota 4 door Sedan owned
by the Town be sold to John Vorndran,highbidder, in the amount of
$125.00.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Motion Unanimously Carried
A memo was received from Mr. Ryan concerning Tall Trees Water
District's financial problems due to
expensive freeze -ups and
water lineproblems this past winter. Outstanding debts amounted
to $7,739.57 and the next billing would bring in $2,800 if everyone
paid on time. He requested that a loan be made to this district
of $6,000.00 from the "B" fund.
MR. DIEHL moved that $6,000.00 be transferred to the Tall Trees
Water District from the General Fund "B" as a loan and the normal
interest rates be charged.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen
Motion Unanimously Carried
MR. DIEHL moved to affirm the following Polling Places for the
Town of Wappinger:
POLLING PLACE LOCATION
Mesier Homestead, Mesier Park
Wappinger Town Hall, Mill Street
Garner Engine Company, Aaadem^Street
Wappinger Junior High School, Remsen Avenue
Ketcham High School, Myers Corners Road
New Hackensack Church Education Center, Rt. 376
Ketcham High School, Myers Corners Road
Ketcham High School, Myers Corners Road
New Hackensack Fire House, Myers Corners Road
Myers Corners Elementary School, Myers Corners Rd.
Hughsonvill Fire House, Hopewell Road
Hughsonville Fire House
Wappinger Junior High School, Remsen Avenue
Chelsea School House, Liberty Street, Chelsea
Chelsea School House
Hughsonville Fire House
Myers Corners Elementary School, Myers Corners Rd.
Myers Corners Elementary School
Mt. Hope Grange, Myers Corners Road
New Hackensack Fire House
New Hackensack Church Education Center
Seconded by Mrs. Mills
The following letter was received:
Mr. E. S. Hawksley
3 Franton Drive
Wappingers Falls, New York
Dear Mr. Hawksley:
DISTRICT
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
14th
15th
16th
17th
18th
19th
20th
21st
Motion Unanimously Carried
June 19, 1979
11 8 7
Attached is the Letter of Intent for participation in the Hudson
River Oil and Hazardous Substances Spill Committee.
Please return the signed letter to me by July 15. In the event
that you cannot sign, please advise me as to the reason or
reasons.
Very truly yours,
s/ E.S. Shafer
HUDSON RIVER OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES SPILL COMMITTEE
Letter of Intent
It is desired to establish an Oil and Hazardous Substances
Spill Committee comprised of federal, state, and local government
agencies, organizations and industry for the purpose of drafting,
maintaining, and implementing, as required, a contingency plan
for mitigating spills of oil or hazardous substances on or
immediately adjacent to the Hudson River in New York, between
the Kingston-Rhinecliff Bridge and the Bear Mountain Bridge.
tNg
Participating agencies, organizations and industry shall
basically agree to contribute, within their areas of expertise
or interests, toward the development and implementation of a
viable contingency plan for response to significant oil or
hazardous substances spills within the given area.
Representatives of participating agencies, organizations
and industry shall form subcommittees under the guidance and
direction of a coorinating committee to develop and implement
-a local spill contingency plan.
Participation in any phase of the development or imple-
mentation of the contingency plan is considered voluntary on
behalf of all agencies, organizations and industry and is in
the combined environmental interest and welfare of all partici-
pants, local communities, residents and users of the Mid -Hudson
River area.
Considering all the above, the undersigned agrees to
participate directly or through representation. The approximate
list of goals and objectives is attached herewith. This letter
of intent does not commit any party to execute any formal agreement.
MR. JOHNSON moved that the Supervisor be authorized to sign the
Letter of Intent and it be returned to the appropriate principals.
Seconded by Mrs. Mills
Motion Unanimously Carried
Under Committee Reports, Mr. Johnson reported that the Recreation
Committee had met with She Recreation Commission and members of
Little League Association to discuss problems with the fields,
some of them safety related problems. A letter had been received
from the Commission addressed to the Committee addressing each of
the 20 items individually, showing which of the items have been
completed. All of the safety related problems had been taken
care of; other maintenance items would be addressed at budget
time.
MR. JOHNSON moved that a copy of this letter be sent to Mr. Wayne
Holton, President of the Little League Association.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Johnson further reported that he was accumulating information
from the public who attended the public hearing on the Zoning
Ordinance and these would be addressed at a future date; they
had not been forgotten, but it would take time to solve some of
them.
Mrs. Mills asked Mr. Horton to look into an "attractive nuisance"
that existed on Wildwood Drive at Brian Place which was an old
tree stump that the kids had taken over and added boards to.;
thus making a ramp for bicycle tricks and whatever else they
felt like making it. It has proved to be dangerous and one
child had already broken a shoulder.
The next item she brought up was the brick wall at the entrance
to Wildwood Drive on the right side. Someone apparently had
hit it and it was gradually disintegrating, bit by bit some of
the bricks were being pulled off of the wall. Mrs. Mills did
not know who was responsible for the maintenance of this wall,
and she requested Mr. Horton to check the ownership on this.
Mr. Gunderud, Building Inspector and Zoning Administrator was
present and Mr. Diehl asked him to check this out, also.
Mrs. Mills then spoke of another drainage problem --there is a
drainage ditch at the end of all the homes on the left side of
Wildwood Drive, there is a right-of-way at one of the houses
there, near the Wildwood Manor Apartments. The apartment had
put up a fence near the recreation area but through the years
it has raised about 10 inches and is in bad condition, falling
apart actually. The resident children have found this out and
have easy access to the drainage water and were making a mess.
Mrs. Mills asked Mr. Horton to investigate this matter and
report back to the Board.
Mr. Jensen reported that the Tri -Municipal project was moving
slowly due to the impact statements still coming in.
A communication was received from Patricia Havens, City Chamber-
lain of Poughkeepsie regarding a resolution adopted by the
Common Council seeking support from the Towns of Poughkeepsie,
LaGrange and Wappinger to operate the ski facility at College Hill.
MR. DIEHL moved that this be referred to the Recreation Commission
for their review and recommendation due to the fact that we must
have more information before we can support this facility and
a copy of this referral be forwarded to the City of Poughkeepsie.
Seconded by Mrs. Mills
Motiom:Unanimously Carried
A report was received from Mr. Lapar enclosing a copy of the
leak survey recently made by Heath Consultants and a voucher
for this service, in the amount of $9,182.00.
MR. DIEHL moved that the Comptroller be authorized to pay the
voucher from the appropriate district account and at a later
date this amount be included in the bonding for the new well.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Lapar, in this letter, had suggested that all the Town
owned leaks be repaired as soon as possible and the private
owners be directed to repair their leaks within a reasonable
time.
MR. DIEHL moved that the Attorney formulate a letter to the
residents that have leaks in their line instructing them to
repair them by a definite time and this letter would go out from
the Supervisor's office.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen
Motion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Jensen mentioned that we do need to have hydrants replaced
and it would be a good time to do this when the Town is having
leaks repaired and include the installation of the hydrants in
the bonding; the hydrants are stored in the Town garage so it
would just be for the installation.
MR. DIEHL moved that the Town go to informal bid to correct the
Town leaks as shown by the Heath report.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Motion Unanimously Carried
A letter was received from Judy Crawford requesting permission
to block off the lower half of Cindy Lane in Quiet Acres for a
Block Party on September 8, 1979.
MR. DIEHL moved that permission be given for this Block Party
subject to barricades being put up to block off the street that
can be easily moved in case of emergencies and that the Fire
Company, Sloper Willen Ambulance and the Dutchess County Sheriff
Department be notified of the day and time of this event.
Seconded by Mrs. Mills Motion Unanimously Carried
A letter was received from Mr. Hawksley, Chairman of the
Conservation Advisory Council requesting an increase in the
pay scale of the secretary from $2.90 to $3.00 per hour.
Mr. Diehl informed Mr. Hawksley that the Board had discussed
this matter but felt this was not the time to increase the
pay scale. They would certainly consider it at budget time,
and asked him to make another request at that time.
The following letter was received:
July 5, 1979
Town Board -Town of Wappinger
Town Hall -Mill Street
Wappingers Falls, NY
Dear Members of the Town Board:
I have been receiving a number of inquiries as to
installation of gasoline storage tanks on residential
property and had to issue a permit for one (1) 2,000
gallon tank on Spook Hill Road, on July 3rd, 1979.
Research by me, Jon Adams and the fire company
inspectors revealed that very little control is available to
us by the present Zoning Ordinance, Building Code or National
Fire Codes.
I feel this use in residential areas is hazardous and
a moratorium should be placed on any further permits until
such time as a satisfactory procedure can be developed.
Very truly yours,
s/ Hans R. Gunderud
Building Inspector
The following Ordinance was introduced by COUNCILMAN JENSEN:
BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger
as follows:
The Zoning Ordinance adopted by the Town Board of the
Town of Wappinger on July 9, 1979 is amended as follows:
Section 1. Section 483.8 is amended by the addition of Section
483.81.
Section 483.81 Storage of Gasoline
483.81 No storage of gasoline for use in motor vehicles
or other motors shall be permitted in any
residential zones.
483.82 This section shall not apply to temporary
storage of gasoline in portable containers
having a capacity less than five gallons.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective as prescribed
by Town Law Section 265.
.02
MR. DIEHL moved to set a Public Hearing on an Ordinance Amending
the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Wappinger Prohibiting Gasoline
Storage Tanks in Residential Areas on July 30th, 1979 at 7:00 PM
at Town Hall, Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York, at which
time all interested persons will be heard.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly
Motion Unanimously Carried
Before this Ordinance was introduced there was considerable
discussion on the floor regarding the issuance of a permit
by the Building Inspector for the 2,000 gallon gasoline storage
tank mentioned in his letter to the Board.
Mrs. O'Malley asked if this resident was in a state of morator-
ium or could he continue installing this storage tank. She was
told this was legal, there was no law on the books that would
prevent the Building Inspector from issuing the permit. She
went on to say it was next to the gas line and Central Hudson
told her it was extremely hazardous; she called her insurance
agency and her insurance premium would be increased due to this
action. Further Mrs. O'Malley stated that the zoning in that
area was residential; this man owned a landscaping business and
he was using the storage tank to fuel his trucks. Mr. Diehl
directed Mr. Gunderud to check this out, also to check with Mr.
Lehigh, Chief of New Hackensack Fire District, on the danger of
the gas tank, referencing to the statement from Central Hudson.
Jack Raio, 19 Dara Lane, being recognized by the Chair, asked if
he could keep commercial trucks on his property since it was a
residential area; in the summer months it was landscaping and in 14110
the winter months it was plowing. Mr. Gunderud would check out
this statement regarding a business being conducted from the
home and report back to the Board with his findings.
1
Under unfinished business, a report was received from Mr. Lapar,
enclosing a map of the Castle Point Recreation Area showing no
water front property owned by the Town.
L
11.90
A report was received from Hans Gunderud, Building Inspector
and Zoning Administrator responding to Mr. Lapar's Memo on place-
ment of water meters. He felt that the suggested ideas of Mr.
Lapar's were valid ones but were alread spelled out in the State
Building Code and felt it may be "reduntant to add suggested items
to the rules and regulations to water hook-ups at this time, since
an inspector is required to enforce the New York State Code as well
as the local rules". His last paragraph read "I feel the present
format and content of the Rules and Regulations are due for a major
revision and I, as well as William Horton, have input to make as to
the total requirements to meet Town of Wappinger needs".
MR. JENSEN moved that this memo be received and placed on file.
Seconded by Mrs. Reilly.
Motion Unanimously Carried
Under unfinished business, Mr. Horton reported that no further
work had been done on Brook Place in the Scofield Subdivision;
last month he had recommended that Mr. Scofield be given thirty
days to complete the agreed upon work.
MR. DIEHL moved that the Attorney be instructed to take the necessary
legal action to call the bond in the Scofield Subdivision at the
expiration of the thirty days notice, if the work has not been
completed.
Seconded by Mr. Jensen
Notion Unanimously Carried
Mr. Ralph Leed had previously requested to hook-up to the Wildwood
Sewer District and this request had been referred to the Health
Department for approval. They granted permission for him to connect
to the system subject to the Town approval. There was a question
if he was in the district and if not, there were certain conditions
he would have to agree to, and the Board needed further information.
MR. JENSEN moved that this matter be tabled until further information
was received from Mr. Lapar on the validity of the hook-up fee and
the amount of this fee and the 0 & M charges for a tenant to the
district.
Seconded by Mrs. Mills
Motion Unanimously Carried
194
Under new business, Mrs. Snowden informed the Board a petition
had been received to reopen the Cranberry Hills Water Improvement
Area by Atlas Water Company to the Department of Environmental
Conservation.
MR. JENSEN moved that this be referred to the Attorney for the
appropriate action that would be necessary to answer this petition
by July 25, 1979,
Seconded by Mr. Johnson
Motion Unanimously Carried
MRS. MILLS moved to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Mr. Johnson
and carried.
The meeting adjourned at 9:34 P.M.
Elaine H. Snowden
Town Clerk
Reg. Mtg. 7/9/79
r
NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL S_CNI= IC NCE
1 1 9 a
The Town Board of the Town of Wappinger, New York,
as lead agency for the proposed Comprehensive Zoning
and Land Use Regulations project has caused this Environ-
mental Assessment to be prepared, pursuant to the require-
ments of the State Environmental Quality Review Act, Part
617 of the Environmental Conservation Law of the State of
New York.
Assessment of the potential environmental inpact of
this project is based upon environmental criteria as out-
lined in the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
It is the determination of the Town Board of the Town
of Wappinger that the proposed Comprehensive Zoning and
Land Use Regulations will have no adverse i=pact on the
environment and therefore this Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance, with the attached com entary
and appendices is made and declared to be the tindings
of the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger.
Adopted by Resolution of the Town Boar of the Tom
of Wappinger at a regular meeting on Jul-. 9. 1979.
J
1196
The determination of the environmental impact resulting
from the adoption of a comprehensive revised zoning ordinance
and map must be made in the context of the many variables
which attach to land use practices. At one end of the
spectrum, land development and use, when vieT•:ed in the
environmental context, could be wholly denied toprevent
any impact on environmental elements. At the opposite
end of the spectrum, land use could be unregulated,
thereby creating a maximum potential for adverse impact
upon environmental elements. Human needs and the promotion
thereof require both the consideration of the environmental
elements and the consideration of whether or not at times,
such human needs may outweigh the preservation of environ-
mental elements in their pristine state. Where development
is inevitable, environmental considerations require that
such development be permitted in a manner that will minimize
environmental impact.
Any zoning ordinance necessarily reflects the weighing
of interest between development and preservation of the
environment. A zoning ordinance which absolutely forbids
development would be constitutionally suspect. Conversely,
a zoning ordinance which failed to consider environmental
elements would be equally suspect in teras of meeting
legitimate environmental objectives.
Consideration of land use proposals must also be made
in the context of existing land use experiences within
the municipality.
Finally, any land use evaluation made in environmental
1 1 9 7
context to the extent that such evaluation attempts to
project actual impact is inherently speculative, as the
objective of such zoning ordinance is not to affirmatively
cause growth, but to control the same. Whether or not
such development will take place cannot be ascertained
with any degree of reasonable certainty. Therefore, the
ability to project actual impacts is diminished.
Nevertheless, notwithstanding the foregoing constraints,
a determination of no adverse environmental impact is made
for the following reasons:
1. Commercial activity will be relegated to those
areas which are presently heavily used. Commercial areas
will not be expanded into areas of current low density
land use, thus eliminating the impact of such co. Lercial
activity to areas already experiencing high intensity
views. Illustrative is the Route 9 corridor.
2. Low density residential zoning is generally
prevelant in those areas adjacent to the Hudson River,
thus minimizing the impact of any development upon the
ecological system of the river.
3. Higher intensity residential development is
limited to those areas generally served by municipal
water and sewage facilities, thus minimizing the impact
of such development on existing water tables and sub-
surface waters.
4. Section 480 of the zoning ordinance makes provision
for the control of obnoxious activities including but not
limited to noise, vibrations, smoke, dust, toxic matters,
1198
traffic, and other activities that if left unregulated
would adversely affect the quality of the environment.
No comparable provisions are present in the existing
zoning ordinance.
5. Provision is made for site plan review of all non-
residential activities, empowering town agencies, as an
incidence to development, to take into consideration
environmental factors and considerations in regulating
development of such sites.
6. Provision is made for special considerations which
are attached to development of flood -prone areas.
7. Provision is made for designated residential develop-
ment (Section 442) which development places priority
upon considerations of preservation of environmental
features. Such designated residential development is
a floating zone permitted throughout the town.
1199
APPENDIX C
LIST OF INVOLVED AGENCIES
The Town Board of the Town of W'appinger is the sole
agency involved in the funding or approval of this action.
The proposed Comprehensive Zoning and Land Use Regulations
document has been reviewed by the Commissioner of the Dutchess
County Department of Planning, pursuant to Section 239-M of
the General Municipal Law. This agency may only recommend
changes or state objections to the proposed zoning ordinance,
but does not fund or approve the project. Further, it has
been ascertained that there are no other agencies involved
in the funding or approval of this action.
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
Based upon the determination of no significant effect
on the environment of the proposed Comprehensive Zoning and
Land Use Regulations, an Environmental Ilipac_ Statement will
not be prepared.
ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA DETERMINED NOT TO BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS
The criteria listed below, considered to be indicators
of potential significant effect on the environment, will not
be adversely affected by enactment of the proposed Compre-
hensive Zoning and Land Use Regulations.
1. A substantial increase in solid waste production.
2. The substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species.
3. Impacts on a significant habitat area.
4. Substantial adverse effects on a threatened or
endangered species of animal or plant or the
habitat of such a species.
5. The encouraging or attracting of a large number
of people to a place or places for more than a
few days compared to the number of people who
would come to such place absent the action.
6. A major change in the use of either the quantity
or type of energy.
7. The creation of a material demand for other actions
which would result in one of the above consequences.
The land use controls contained in the proposed Compre-
hensive Zoning and Land Use Regulations Ordinance will, for
each criterion listed, protect the environmental factors
to a more significant degree than the existing zoning
ordinance of the Town of Wappinger.
EAF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PAP': II
Project Impacts and Their Macritude
General Information (Read Carefully)
-• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the questic7: -ave ::yy decisions and determinations
been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert envircr:-•ental analyst.
- Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also nece7sarily
significant. Any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to deterrne significance. By identifying an
effect in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further.
- The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold
of magnitude that would trigger a response ir, column 2. The example: are gereraily applicably throughout the
LieState and for most situations. But, for any specific project or sit_ :cher examples and/cr lower thresholds
may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating.
- Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the exam -?les have begin offered as guidace.
They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
- The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully)
a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2 Answer Yes if there will be any effect.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a cuestion then Check the appropriate box ^n 1 or 2) to indicate the potential
size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any exp-ple provided, check colu-n 2. If
impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check c:'.-, 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt aoout the size of the impact then consider _-e i -pact as :otentialiy larg= and
proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a c~a-;e in the croject to a less than large
magnitude, place 3 Yes in column 3. A No response indicates tr'_t sS,Ch a ret'ucton is not possible.
1. 2 . 3.
S!'% -_L TO POTENTiAL CAI IMPACT BE
MODEPATE LARGE REDUCED BY
iM?ACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE
IMPACT ON LAND
i) YES
RILL THERE BE A'1 EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHAtir;E TO CO
PROJECT SITE?
Exarples that Would Apply to Column 2
Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per
100 foot of length), cr where the general slopes in the project
area exceed 100.
Construction on Land where the death to the water table is less
than 3 feet.
rGnStractiOn of nav='.f nartiir'•q are, *or 1,.•nn ,r rare vehicles.
CAritr,:c7.inn on lane ,.re' -e bedro0. is exnosed or .,r_'Trally
withir 3 feet of eli,ting ground surface.
Cons'_rictl n that 4.11 continue for more thAn 1 :?' or invo1.
mpe than "ne nhac,! or Stan
Excavation for .lUl'tt Vii'„ :l:,SeS tont:', would rer-n'•c' Hare than
tons if r..'u 3i 'a"r' 1 i.e. rr..r. or .oil) per .-•dr.
;c••__r,,.tior of
Construction in a designated floodway.
Other impacts:
------------fig YES
2. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LAN° FnRMs
FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, geological forma-
tions, etc.)
Specific land forms:
IMPACT ON WATER
NO YES
3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS O
PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envir-
onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.)
ExaToles that Mould Apply to Column 2
Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from
channel of a protected stream.
Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
Other impacts:
4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON -PROTECTED EXISTING. OR NFI•! NO Y
EODY OF NATER?
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
A 10`l increase or decrease in the surface area of any body
of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of
surface area.
Other ir:pacts:
NO YES
WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE. OR GROU'IDWATER DUALITY?
Examples that !•'culd Apply to Column 2
Project will re^.uire a discharge permit.
Project requires use of a source of water that does not have
approval to serve proposed project.
Project requires water supply from wells with nreater
than i5 gallons per minute pumping capacity.
Construction or operation causing any contamination
of a public water supply system.
Project will ad,ersely affect grnundwater.
Liquid efficent will be conveyed off the site to
facilities w'ich presently do not e,cist or have
inadequate capacity.
Project reeuirirg a facility that would use water in
excess of ?",nT,O Gallons per day.
Projact will 1 .el; rause siltation ur other ,±I. har,;e
into an exis:ir; Co!v of water to the extent that there
will he en...,.,s .isual contrast to natural corjitions
-
120 1
2. 3.
TIAL CAN I !'ACT OE
L""SE REDUCED sY
i' 'CT PROJECT C'A GE
Other Impacts:
6. ,TILL PROJECT ALTER DRAINAGE FLOu, PATTERNS OR SURFACE !TATER NO YES
RUNOFF?
00
Example that ':ould A.nply to Column 2
Project would impede flood water flows.
Project is likely to cause substantial erosion.
Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
Other impacts:
FACT ')N AIR
YES
7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY') 0 0
Fxtmples that Would Apply to Column 2
Project will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton
of refuse per hour.
Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5
lbs. Per hour or a heat source producing more than 10
million BTU's per hour.
Other lmoacts:
N P ANT A!'
•
NO YES
8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES? 0 0
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York
or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or
found on the site.
Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild-
life habitat.
Application of Pesticide or herbicide over more than
twice a near other thin forr.7y'cJltur31 purposes.
0t'ier impacts:
9. WILL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT HON -THREATENED OR
ENDANGERED SPECIES?
Example that Would Apply to Column 2
Project would substantially interfere with art.!, resident
or migratory fish or wildlife species.
Project recjires the removal of more than 19 acres of
mature forest (over 109 ye)rs in ane) or otner 1•.cally
important vegetation.
-7-
NO Y E S
1. 2.. 3 1 2 0 2
S".A'-L TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE
11JE rTE LARGE REDUCED CY
I"PACT PROJECT CHANGE
it,14
I''nACT C'. :'IS''4L RESOt!RC E
10. t!ILL.THE PROJECT AFrECT VIEWS, VISTAS OR TIF V!SI$AL
CHARACTER OF THE NrIG!IB')Rir.?00 OR COriNITv?
Example: that Mould Apply to Column 2
An incompatible visual affect caused by the introeuction
of new materials, colors and/or forams in contrast to the
surroundinn landscape.
A project easily visible, not easily screened,that is
obviously different from ethers around it.
Project will result in the elimination or major
screening of scenic views or vistas known to be
important to the area.
Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES
NO YEc
00
11. WILL PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES
PRE-HISTnDIC nR PALEO!iTOtICAL II'.POPTANCE? ® 0
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
Project occurino wholly or partially within or continuous
to any facility or site listed on the National Renister of
historic places.
Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located
within the project site.
Other impacts:
IIPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION
12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES
OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU'IITIES'
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
00
The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
Other impacts:
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
13. !'ILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION
SYSTE}AS?
Examples that Would Ar>ply to Column 2
Alteration of present patterns of movement of neople
and/or goods.
Project will result in severe traffic nroblers.
ithnr
NO YES
00
1. Z. 3.
S".;.LL _i ,., C. IT:'=; -r ?_
;C'H _ _ u
_E PECUCE'
1 -- PROJECT C.;'.:_
12O 3I
IMPACT ON ENERGY
14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR
ENERGY SUPPLY?
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
Project causing greater than 5% increase in any form of
energy used in municipality.
Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single
or two fa,-ily residences.
Other impacts:
NO YES
00
IMPACT ON NOISE
15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES
or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....V
0
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
Blasting within 1,50D feet of a hospital, school or other
sensitive facility.
Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per.dav).
Project will produce operating noise exceedinn the •
local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
Other impacts:
1,
It'PACT 0`: HEALTH & HAZARDS
!JILL PROJECT AFFECT FUSLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY?
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
NO YES
0 0
Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)
in the event of accident or unset conditions, or there will
he a chronic lot•' level discharge or emission.
Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes"
(i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc., includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid,
liquid or contain gases.)
Storaoe facilities for ore million or more gallons of liquified
natural gas or ot',;:r linuids.
Other i:T.a_ts.
1204
.
P^.TE'1Ti?L C:,a ";
.:"C P„ T CE
OJ=r-TE LA GE RE:,J . 0 3Y
I"rACT I';PACT PROJECT CHANGE
r �
IH?ACT ON GRn;TN ANO Clil.'t TER OF C)'V!U NITY OR rJElr,!'R'1RHfOD
17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER nF THE EXISTING
COMMUNiTY?
Example that Would A.poly to Column 2
The population of the City, Town or Village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5; of
resident human population.
The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera-
ting services will increase by more than 5% per year as a
result of this project.
Will involve any permanent facility of a non-agricultural
use in an agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural
lands from cultivation.
The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities,
structures or areas of historic importance to the community.
Development will induce an influx of a particular age
group with special needs.
Project will set an ir.;portant precedent for future projects.
Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more
businesses.
Other ivioacts:
13, IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT?
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
Either government or citizens of adjacent coTriu-ities
have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have
not been contacted.
Objections to the nroject from within the community.
NO {ES
NO
l'ENT1 AL - CAf, IMPACT '5E
-CE?'-= LARGE REDUCED DY 1
pA.C' !!1DACT PROJECT CHAP E"
IF ANY ACTION 1`; PART 2 IS IDENT1FIEJ AS A
POTENTIAL LARGE IP'PACT OR IF YOU CAN';:T vET=`+.INE
THE MAGrNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3.
DETERMINATION
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2
and 3) and considering both the magnitude and imoortance of each
impact, it is reasonably determined that:
PORT!; S OF EAF CG ?LETED FOR THIS PROJECT:
PRT ! T !I PART 3
A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore,
is one which may not cause significant damage to the environrent.
gX x;De ..!x7xNixplgtcim
xxxRRAN4,r-v
XXXXIM xs XXX' XX'XXXXNXX W '+ XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
{XXXx
XXXRXSF: WXXXiil:
X X X;'n`XNlirYX
XXXit'xXML'X<S Xr
ratJul.
r -:.r'.-._ P, NEG;.TIVE DECLARATION
i54}i:xxxxJt X.ai'sCxxixxmmXXXti:A
xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
sigrfature of Prr r if d' erent from resnensrr,le officer)
Jon Ho _ eel ams , Esq..
i
Sign : c= ?�sponsib)e Official in Lead
Agency
Louis D. Diehl. Supervisor
-r- -e ,s -e of responsible official