Loading...
1969-02-20 RGMAGENDA - TOWN BOARD ADJOURNED MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1969 FEBRUARY 20, 1969 1. Supervisor Call Meeting to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Resolutions 4. Accept Minutes --- Dec. 30th; Jan. 2nd; Jan. 13th; Jan. 27th; Jan. 30th. 3.' Reports of Officers Bldg. Insp. Supervisor Town Justices Bills: Gen. Fund 3�' .� 36,ss Highway 6, — RFSDY 1 Oakwood W.D. Z$ k akwood S.D. i:(•/"2! Annual Report from Grinnell Library Annual Reports from Town Justices 6. Petitions & Communications A. R.C. Chase, Ch. Village Recreation Comm. re: Rec. Programming B. J.E. Ludewig re: Construction of road in to Oakwood Pump House • C., Louis Eck, Rep. W.Taxpayers Asscn. re: N.W. Sewer Imp„ D. Alpert, Angel Brook, re: renewal of Performance Bond E. Alpert re: Petition for rezoning (Letter from Worona) F. John French, Sec.Bd. of Fire Comm. New Hackensack Fire Dist. re: intersection Myers Corners & Rt. 9. G. Bidwell, Cedar Hill -Pine Ridge Civic Ascn. re: street lights H. Communications from Planning Board: 1. Recommendation 3.911 0-R 2 s� p .�y� Ret rrrto.�fT/Bd ore: Alpert,&Vorndran I. Letter of Resignation - K. Jennings, Rec. Comm. Late Correspondence J. Porter re: Little League 7. Reports of Committees Audit of Justices Dockets `-L-ight_Comm. ,Unfinished Business Resignation of Ingersoll — Vacancy on Bd. of Assessors Resignation of Cunningham - Vacancy on Rec. Comm. Expiration of term - Arthur Kalaka - Zoning Bd. of Appeals 9. New Business Highway Bids and Fuel Bid mho i is i,rows Co -otero�w4 giNt‘;t‘ Secvkca.. QdN�acM' C:vMM. 10. Adiournment The Regular February Meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger, adjourned from Feb. 13, 1969, was held Feb. 20, 1969, at the Town Hall, Mill Street, Wappingers Falls, New York. Supervisor Diehl called the meeting to order at 7:10 P.M. Present: Louis Diehl, Supervisor Louis Clausen, Councilman G. Donald Finnan, Councilman Leonce Heady, Councilman James Mills, Councilman Elaine H. Snowden, Town Clerk Others Present: William Horton, Superintendent of Highways Allan Rappleyea, Attorney to the Town Rudolph Lapar, Engineer to the Town Mr. Diehl stated that a Public Hearing had been held by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger on Feb. 13, 1969, on the rezoning application of Stella & Philip Dominicus, at which time all persons wishing to be heard were heard, and the Public Hearing was declared closed. Recommendations had been received from the Dutchess County Planning Board and the Town of Wappinger Planning Board. Clerk's Note: Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing, letters from Town Planning Board and Dutchess County Planning Board, Affidavit of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing on file at time of Public Hearing, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER The following Ordinance was introduced by COUNCILMAN MILLS who moved its adoption. BE IT RESOLVED and ordained by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, in pursuance of the authority conferred by the laws of the State of New York, as follows: Section 1. The Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance and Map, adopted January 29, 1963, as amended from time to time, is hereby further amended by re -zoning the following parcel of land from "RD 20 - Optional Dwelling - Residential" to "HB - 1 Highway Business", said tract of land being on the west side of Route 9 in the Town of Wappinger and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument set on the westerly line of relocated Route No. 9, said concrete monument being the intersection of the Westerly line of said relocated Route No. 9 with the southerly line of lands of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation and running thence along the westerly line of said relocated Route No. 9 the following: South 2-02-20 East 107-17 feet to a point; thence South 7-40-40 East 83.00 feet to a point; thence leaving said line and running along the northerly line of lands of Schellenberg North 77-57-00 west 308-40 feet to a point on the easterly line of lands of aforesaid Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation; thence leaving said line and running along the easterly and southerly lines of lands of said Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, along a stone wall, the following: north 24-17-30 east 95.98 feet to a point; thence north 37-03-60 east 57.05 feet to a point; thence north 49-31-30 east 37.13 feet to a point; thence South 82-16-30 east 121.72 feet to a point; thence south 75-42-30 east 64.05 feet to the point of beginning containing 1.05 acres of land be the same more or less. Section 2. This amendment shall become effective upon adoption, posting and publication as prescribed by Town Law. Seconded by: Councilman Clausen Roll Call Vote: Supervisor Diehl Aye Councilman Clausen Aye Councilman Finnan Ave Councilman Heady Ave Councilman Mills Aye Ordinance Duly Adopted: Feb. 20, 1969 Mr. Diehl acknowledged receipt of a petition by town residents objecting to the rezoning of 59 acres on All Angels and Myers Corners Road from R-20 & R-40 to PI. Rules were suspended by motion of Mr. Diehl, seconded by Mr. Clausen and carried. Robert L'Archevesque submitted the following letter with a petition: Feb. 20, 1969 Town Clerk Town of Wappinger Mill St. Wappingers Falls, N.Y. Dear Mrs. Snowden: Please be advised that I am opposed to the application of Cogar Inc. for a rezoning of certain property on All Angels Hill Rd. from R -20/R-40 to P.I. (Planned Industry). I, too, recognize the need for an increased industrial base in the Town of Wappinger but let us not, in our haste to encourage industry, violate and corrupt the original master plan which was developed at considerable cost to the Town of Wappinger and which was approved by the voters. Certainly, if this application is approved, no homeowner in our Town, regardless of where he lives, can feel secure that on a given day he won't see a factory being built next door or across the street, Without even addressing the problems associated with this application such as traffic control and the provision water and sewage, it is a fact that the Town has designated P.I. areas to be used for this purpose in the current zoning ordinance and, which, when compromised by an application like this is an invitation to any industrial concern to do the 29 same. If the Town Board is sincerely interested in encouraging industry to locate in Wappinger then form an industrial commission and establish an industrial park complete with facilities in those areas of the Town so designated. Spot zoning is not only illegal but is a destroyer of the master plan and a source of constant iritation and uncertainity to the public. Attached you will find petitions with over 240 signatures from residents of the Town of Wappinger and which support a denial of the rezoning application of Cogar Inc. Given more time, I'm sure that (10) times this number would have signed the petitions. You, as representatives of the people along with myself must act in the best interests of the majority of our constituents and there is no doubt in my mind that the majority of the residents of this Town are opposed to this application. I strongly urge you to deny this application for the reasons stated herein. Sincerely yours, s/ R.L. L'Archevesque Dutchess County Board of Rep. Rules were resumed upon motion of Mr. Finnan, seconded by Mr. Clausen and carried. MR. FINNAN moved that all the letters received by the Town Board concerning this Cogar rezoning be read into the record. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Roll Call Vote: Supervisor Diehl Ave Councilman Clausen Ave Councilman Finnan Ave Councilman Heady Ave Councilman_ Mills Ave Feb. 10, 1969 Town of Wappinger Board. Attn: Mr. Louis Diehl Diehl, Supervisor Mill Street Wappingers Falls, New York Gentlemen: The Chamber of Commerce of Wappingers, urges that the board, at its meeting on the 13th, approve the Cogar Corporation request for a change in zoning at the companies proposed site. The Chamber feels that an industry of this type, is what the Wappinger area wishes to attract in order to bring some -relief to the tax burdened homeowner in our area. The average homeowner in Wappingers Falls is bearing an ever increasing tax load, due primarily to the absence of such vital industrial development. After studying the Cogar proposal and the background of the principals involved, it is obvious that this firm will be one of the most complex and modern technological facilities in the world and that the community should get behind such a firm that has the potential of becoming a world leader in technological development. Plans developed by the company indicate that it has made every effort to make its site not only an asset to the community financially but aesthetically as well. Sincerely, Daniel G. Ryan President, Wappingers Falls Chamber of Commerce, Inc. Feb. 14, 1969 Town Board of Supervisors Town Hall Wappingers Falls, New York Gentlemen, Beltagh Enterprises, Ltd., is a corporation located on Myers Corners Road, Wappingers Falls, New York. We chose Wappingers as a business location because we felt it to be a desirable location with a healthy attitude towards business. At present we have ten employees who live in and around -the Wappingers area. At the board meeting on February 13th, 1969, I was -very surprised at the Town Board, for allowing a small segment of Wappingers residents to abuse and riducule a company with such good intentions for the area and its residents, that can result in nothing but good and community enhancement. We at Beltagh certainly hope that our choice of Wappingers Falls as a business location, was a good one and strongly urge the zoning approval of the sigit in question. Very truly yours, Beltagh Enterprises, LTD. s/ Robert J. Kowalski President Feb. 17, 1969 Town Board Town Hall Wappingers Falls, N.Y. Gentlemen: I would strongly suggest the approval of Cogar Corporations request to establish their business in this area. This type of industry is very desirable to the area and very much needed in Wappingers Falls. Thank you. Very truly yours, s/ Lawrence Sheehan Lawrence Shell Service, Inc. Myers Corners Road Town Board Town Hall Wappingers Gentlemen: of Supervisors Falls, N.Y. Feb. 15, 1969 We of DeGarmo Hills Wine & Liquors would like to take this opportunity to strongly urge the town board to act in favor of rezoning the proposed Cogar sight. This type of industry is Wappingers Falls. very desirable and needed in Again, please vote in favor. Thank you. Very truly yours, s/ Kenneth M. Chrinian, Mgr. DeGarmo Hills Wines & Liquors February 14, 1969 Town Board, Town of Wappinger Louis Diehl, Supervisor Mill Street Wappingers Falls, New York Gentlemen: After attending Thursday's meeting at the Town Hall, and later at the School, I was appalled at the manner oftreatment accorded the Cogar Corporation representatives. It is discouraging to see a number of people, representing a min- ority, of not only the Town, but the area affected as well, allowed to _display such rude behavior at a gathering so important to the Town as a whole.. I sincerely hope, the actions of these few, does not influence a negative reaction toward Cogar by the Board. If this is the case, an ideal industry will be forced to locate elsewhere, but most important, a trend will be established, that will force other indus- tries seeking to locate in Dutchess County., to bypass Wappinger and settle in neighboring communities. The time has come, for those responsible for charting the course of Wappinger Falls, to make a decision: either approve this appli- cation and then actively seek others of the same caliber, OR, reject same and place Wappinger in a status quo category, with a reputation of bowing to the whims of self-centered, special interest groups. The decision is yours Sincerely, Daniel G. Ryan President Wappingers Falls Chamber of Commerce, Inc. Feb. 14, 1969 Town Board of Wappingers Town Hall Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 12590 292 Gentlemen: We at Metronic Laboratories are in favor of the rezoning for Cogar Corporation. For many years, the Town of Wappingers has needed this type of highly desirable industry. Please do not fail in your obligation to the majority of Wappingers residents and their future needs. Cogar, will bring nothing but good to the area. Thank you for this opportunity and please approve their application. Very truly yours, s/ Daniel Patsy Metronic Laboratories, Inc. Feb. 15, 1969 Wappingers Town Board Mill Street Wappingers Falls, New York Attn: Mr. Louis Diehl, Town Supervisor Gentlemen: The other evening I attended the public hearing regarding the proposed rezoning of property at the corner of Myers Corner and All Angels Hill Roads. I spoke neither for nor against the proposal as there was already an abundance of speakersrepresenting both sides. However, I am against the proposal both on specific and general grounds, and I should like to tell you why. Specifically, I have very serious reservations about the desirability of placing an industry with a potentially unknown number of employees in that location. Everyone seems to agree that the roads in that area are barely adequate now. In this regard, I do not subscribe to the theory, advanced by some at the hearing, that we should make a bad situation worse so that the roads might be improved. Further, I believe you gentlemen should heavily weigh the fact that approval of this proposal will place an unknown amountof traffic relatively close to two large schools. School bus traffic on Myers Corners Road and at the intersection in question may well be greater than at any other location in Dutchess County. Improving the roads will not alter the school traffic situation. Another matter warranting very serious consideration surrounds the question of what happens if Cogar leaves. There seems to be no question that their particular operations would be clean, quiet and require minimal truck traffic. However, if they should leave Wappingers, does the town have any legal voice as to who moves in so long as they meet the requirements of PI Zoning? It seems quite possible that a business completely unsuited for that area could meet the PI requirements. Just what are the economics of this specific proposal? Not one definitive statement was presented regarding this at the public hearing. We are told that this industry will help us with taxes. Fine: But by how much? And what factors such as locally available labor force, projected growth of the town with and without Cogar, etc, have been considered in arriving at this conclusion. If all L these factors are considered will their taxes justify this rezoning? It appears that the economics of this specific proposal relate more to Cogar than to the citizens of Wappingers. From what was said at the public hearing, it seems that if the price,of.existing planned industry sites had been satisfactory to Cogar, this proposal would not now be an issue. The price apparently was not satisfactory so a site in an R-40 zone is the issue. It is my opinion that site approval under these circumstances would violate the intent of the zoning ordinance. There are other questions relating to this specific proposal which warrant discussion. For example water, sewerage, adjacent property value etc. Tam sure you gentlemen will give these matters due consideration, so I will not burden you with my opinions at this point. However, there does remain a more general, related question that concerns me. Is the Town of Wappingers properly and adequately zoned? If it is, then the course of action you should take on the above discussed proposal would seem obvious:_. If it is not zoned ade- quately, then the course of action you should take is less apparent and more difficult to decide. However, one thing is certain. If the Town Board believes that the current zoning is inadequate, the taxpayers should be so advised, and the Board should offer compre- hensive, long-range alternatives for the taxpayers consideration. Recent activities of the Planning Board suggest that they feel the current zoning scheme is inadequate. I am referring to the fact that in recent weeks they have reacted favorably to requests for rezoning of four sites in an R-40 zone. These include the Cogar site, two business sites on All Angels Hill Road and the large Angel Brook Estate site if an Office Research Category is amended to the zoning ordinance. I believe that if our current zoning is adequate, there is little need for this kind of rezoning in the heart of residential zones. Very truly yours, s/ Stanford E. Carver 21 Partners Rd. Feb. 17, 1969 Town Board Wappingers Falls, N.Y. I live on All Angels Hill Rd. across the land to be rezoned for light industrie. Wappingers needs this kind of industrie. In the interest of the taxpayer I do hope you approve the rezoning. s/ Otto Klassen, Builder Febr. 1969 Town Board Wappingers Falls. I live on Meyers Corners Rd. and- have two houses on -All Angels Hill Rd. across the piece of land to be rezoned for industrie. In the interestofthe taxpayers - us - I do hope you vote for the rezoning. s/ August Klassen 5 A Feb. 18, 1969 Town Board Wappingers Falls, N.Y. Gentlemen: We are in favor of re -zoning so that planned industry will be able to locate on the Alexander -Cline property,in=back of the fire house. At the public hearing there was a greater showing of hands against this wonderful idea than there was for it, but this was not a true ,and honest sampling of the local residents. Please vote yes for a zoning variance. Thank you. Sincerely, s/ Marilyn J. Diesing Robert M. Diesing Meadowbrook Farm Old Meyers Corners Rd. Feb. 18, 1969 Town Board Town of Wappinger Town Hall, Mill Street Wappinger Falls, New York Re: -Rezoning for Cogar Industries Attention; Supervisor Diehl Gentlemen:, I urge you to give favorable consideration to the rezoning necessary to permit Cogar Industries to develop. Several years ago I served on a committee, appointed by the Board, whose function was to attract industrial and commercial enterprizes to the Town. The committee met numerous times, consulted with State Department of Commerce experts and others, reviewed the advantages that could be offered by the Town to such enterprizes and then -quietly folded up its wigwam and lapsed into oblivion. Its conclusion, publicly unstated but none the less true, was simply that the Town had little, if anything, to offer a prospective industrial. developer. As far as I can see, the same still holds true. However, If Cogar has chosen Wappinger, for whatever reason, it should be heartily encouraged. It marks -the first concrete breakthrough, that I am aware of, in the Towns developing trend of becoming the "bedroom community" for Southern Dutchess. I am of the firm opinion that selective light industry can develop within residential zones to the advantage of all and I am confident that the Planning Board and the Zoning Administrative Officer can so guide and control such development that no damage will be -done to adjacent residential properties. 296 Incidentally, if the Alperts plan for light industrial zoning is still being pursued, this too should be given every consideration. It is essential that the Town's Tax base be broadened. As so often happens, industrial and commercial development will not conform to the neat patterns of a "master plan The collective common sense judgement of the Board must take precedence over any paper plan, particularly at this stage of Town development. Truly yours, s/ Vincent C. Kelley Pye Lane Feb. 18, 1969 Wappingers Town Council Town of Wappinger Falls, N.Y. Gentlemen: I oWn property and reside on the East side of All Angels Hill Road approximately mid -way between Meyers Corners Road and Widmer Road. The East line of my property abutts on the tract of land presently owned by Klein and Alexander and opt- ioned to Cogar Corporation. I ,attended the public hearing on the proposed rezoning of this tract .of land on February 13, 1969 and aside from. the em- otional rudeness displayed by many persons opposed: to such re- zoning I was impressed by the following factors and would like to make my views on these factors known to you. 1. There was opposition to the proposition on the basis of drainage. As far as I could determine, most of this opposition was ,voiced by persons who would be further•than twelve hundred feet from the nearest boundary of the proposed tract. In addition, most of the persons so opposed -are situated: at considerably higher elevations than the proposed tract. I am at a lower elevation and residing on adjoining property. I have taken the trouble to inquire what waste generation is anticipated by Cogar Corporation. I am convinced that the amount of waste generated by this enterprise would be considerably less than, and more effectively treated than would be the case if this tract were fully utilized for dwellings on central systems. 2. There was opposition to the proposition on the basis of water requirements. Whereas the emotional frenzy of those opposed to the prop- osition at first would not allow, and finally would not consider orderly presentation of the facts, I am fort- unate enough to have been able to reach a judgement based on knowledge of the process line to be employed by Cogar Corporation. As the representatives of Cogar Corporation attempted to state, this process requires little or no fresh water as an imput to their line. Their needs should be primarily of a human necessities nature. Their regu- irements in this regard would be in :line with what would be required by full utilization of the tract by dwellings on central systems. 3. There was opposition to the proposition on the basis of additional traffic on All Angels Hill Road. I submit that All Angels Hill Road is already a heavily trafficked road. One survey that I have heard of has counted something over twelve hundred cars over any twelve hour period. I feel that a fifteen or twenty percent in- crease would be tolerable if the Town of Wappingers stands to directly gain something by that increase. Again, I live on All Angels Hill Road, not on the eddy currents of traffic likely to be found on DeGarmo Hills Road or Brothers Road. I demand a louder voice because of my proximity to the action. 4. There were veiled threats to the Council at the Public Hearing concerning your responsibilities and your vuln- erabilities at Election time. I got the distinct impres- sion that a small vocal minority of the taxpayers in this town actually thought they were representative of the town. I submit to- you that they were not. I further suggest that a referendum on the matter would overwhelming- ly convince even them that they are not representative of the Town of Wappinger Falls on this -matter. However, aside from the cost of a referendum I have learned that Cogar Corporation does not enjoy the luxury of time that would elapse so the issue is academic. My feelingson this matter revolve around one central issue which most of the oppostion refuses to consider seriously. That issue is WHAT ALTERNATIVE USES WOULD BE MADE OF THAT TRACT. If it were simply a matter of Cogar or the status quo I would be with them. I can walk up a slight hill from my back yard and find myself at the perfect place for flying a kite or exercising a dog. I am not so naive to believe that Messrs. Klein and Alexander are to allow me to do this for the rest of my life. I see Cogar Corpora- tion as the more attractive and desirable possibility from my own personal viewpoint and the viewpoint of taxpayers in the Town of Wappinger Falls. GENTLEMEN - I implore and challenge you to make your de- cision in the best interests of the Town of Wappinger Falls as a whole, not in response to a handful of rude Citizens who have demonstrated that they can make a lot of noise. Make your deci- sion in the best interests of those who have both feet on the ground and are doing some clear thinking on the matter rather than in the smaller interests of a handful of Thoreau's who have found--their-own private "Walden's" and seek to preserve the status quo, at the expense of every other taxpayer in the town. Sincerely, s/ Philip E. Pensiero 'All Angels Hill Rd. Feb. 17, 1969 Mr. G. Don Finnan Ada Drive Wappingers Falls, New York Dear Mr. Finnan: I urge you to vote "NO" on the rezoning of property at Myers Corners Road and All Angels Road from R40 to planned industry. This proposal is setting a precedent for any future industry coming to the Town of Wappingers Falls - then defeating the pur- pose of zoning and making zoning a Mockery: Surely some of the Commercially zoned areas should be considered for development as being desirable as planned Industrial Parks. L Although the trucking of a product such as Cogar Corp. would produce is minimal, I do believe that the necessary services to maintain the plant and provide .food for employees would be far too great to be located in a completely surrounded residential area._ The following I do not believe.is relative to the rezoning - but should be clarified: It was stated at last Thursday nights hearing that Cogar Corp. would be employing local residents and not bringing an influx of new families to the area. If Cogar Corp. is acquiring its employees by "robbing" industries in the area - then the industries thus "robbed" will replace their attrition - thereby bringing in the equivalent number of families Cogar Corp. would be hiring. Again, I would urge you to vote "NO" on the rezoning - realising that any vote other than that will start a precedent which can and will affect any and all residential property owners - includ- ing yourself: Sincerely, s/ Mrs. Russell Feb. 17, 1969 All Members of the Town Board Mr. Herman Osten, "Southern Dutchess News After. attending the February 13th Town Board hearing on the rezoning of an area at Myers Corners Road and All Angels Hills Road, a wish to re-emphasize my -feelings concerning this proposal. At no time during -the entire 'course of the hearing was it -possible to obtain an informative or logical answer to any questions put forth to the Town Board, the Planning_Board, or the management of Cogar. We were constantly informed the construction of the plant would be an asset to the area, butwe were not told whyit would be an asset. No one, oncluding the Cogar management, would confirm the estimated -cost of the proposed building (reported by the Chamber of Commerce to be $3 million), therefore no esti- mate could be made of the supposed provision of a $1 million tax base. It was apparent that neither the Town Board nor the Planning Board honestly wished to listen to the negative -views. If it is within their realm to rezone any R-40 or R-20 residential area to industrial without being able to supply logical reasons, it appears that a great deal of money and effort put forth to establish zoning laws has been wasted. If the Town Board -can vote to change a designated area regardless of the many objections, it behooves one to question the true purpose of zoning . At no time during the 3 hour hearing were satisfactory answers given to the inqui- ries put forth regarding the estimated water requirements, sewage disposal requirements and possible adverse effects on the neigh- borhoods's water supply; or the resultant traffic problems at already existing dangerous intersections. In fact, -one was led to believe that the Planning Board did not feel it was their responsibility to investigate such conditions their only aim was to locate a parcel of :land .large -.enough for the proposed construction, no matter who was affected. I realize, of course, that the Town Board feels they represent the entire town and that the residents of the affected area are in a minority. But if elected officials of a town have -the jurisdiction to disregard the rights and legitimate questions of a "minority", why _is. the Government, '.on a national, sta.teL.and 29 8 county level, expending so much money and effort to protect the rights of minority groups. True, the residents of the area involved may be in the, minority concerning this proposed rezoning, but it is because they are the only ones directly affected., If this change in zoning is approved, who can say where the next change will be. Will it be in Edge Hill, Wildwood Forest, or Cedar Hill? No one will deny that industry is needed in the Town of Wappingers --- but the construction of industrial plants should be confined to industrial -zoned areas. If the Planning Board is unable to locate parcels of land in the designated industrial area, it is apparent that they have not fully investigated all available acreage. It is my understanding that the investigation of this proposal has been underway for quite some time, but the residents of the area are interested to know why the matter was never brought before the public until such time as the issue was to be decided upon by the Town Board. s/ Virginia Maynard 38 DeGarmo Hills Mr. Rappleyea counciled the Board regarding the petitions received, mentioning first that they would be placed on file with the Town Clerk, on passing on a vote, the law provides that if a petition is received from owners of land comprising of 20% of the property owners of the lands within the zoned area, or 100 ft thereof, the vote must be 3/4 of the full Board. Depending on the outcome of the vote, some ruling might have to be made as to the validity of the petitions, their signatures, and the number. Mr. Diehl instructed the Town Clerk to place on file the petitions received. Mr. Diehl then stated that a Public Hearing had been held Feb. 13, 1969 on the Amendment to the Zoning Map of the Town of Wappinger in relation to rezoning a parcel of land on Myers Corners Rd. & All Angels Hill Rd. from R-20 and R-40 to PI, at which time all persons wishing to be heard, were heard and the Public Hearing was declared closed, Recommendations were received from the Dutchess County Planning Board and the Town of Wappinger Planning Board. Clerks' Note:: Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing, letters from Town Planning Board and Dutchess County Planning Board, Affidavit,of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing on file at time of Public Hearing. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER The following Ordinance was introduced by COUNCILMAN MILLS who moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED and ordained by the Town Board of the Town of 3 Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, in pursuance of the author- ity conferred by the laws of the State of New York, as follows: Section 1. The Town of Wappinger Zoning Ordinance and Map adopted January 29, 1963, as amended from time to time, is hereby further amended by rezoning the following described parcel of land from "R-40 and R-20" (Residential,Zones) to "PI" (Planned Industry), said tract of land being on the east side of All Angels Hill Road and more particularly described as follows: "BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of All Angels Hill Road, said point being the intersection of the easterly line of said All Angels Hill Road with the southerly line of lands of now or formerly Reuter and running thence along the southerly and easterly lines of lands of now or formerly said Reuter and along the easterly line of lands of now or formerly Muller and along the easterly line of lands of now or formerly Schuele the follow- ing: North 88-00-50 East 275.00 feet to a point; thence north 9-59-20 east 135.00 feet to a point; thence north 11-15-40 east 324.55 feet to a point•on the southeasterly line of lands of now or formerly Schofield; thence leaving said line and running along the southeasterly line of lands of now or formerly said Schofield, along the remains of a stone wall, north 58-16-30 east 1024.72 feet to a stone wall intersection on the westerly line of lands of Eugene Schuele; thence along the westerly line of lands of said Eugene Schuele, along a stone wall and wire fence, the following: South 14-01-50 east 1740.14 feet to a point; thence south 71-44-20 west 38.46 feet to a point; thence south 24-31-10 west 790.86 feet to a point on the northerly line of lands of now or formerly Snowden; thence leaving saidline and running along the northerly line of lands of now or formerly said Snowden, along a wire fence, north 64-53-00 West 100.00 feet to a point on the westerly line of lands of now or formerly said Snowden, thence leaving said line and running along lands of New Hacken- sack Fire Company the following: north 83-50-50 West 472.88 feet to a point on the easterly line of a 50 foot wide right of way: thence along the easterly line of said 50 foot wide right- of-way, along the westerly line of lands of said New Hackensack Fire Company, the following: South 7-54-10 east 300.00 feet to a point; thence South 10-16-00 West 338.00 feet to a, point on the northerly line of Meyers Corners Road; thence along the northerly line of said Meyers Corners Road, south 89-37-30 West 50.77 feet to a point; thence leaving said line and running along the westerly line of aforesaid 50 foot wide right-of-way, along the easterly line of lands of Eugene Schuele, the follow- ing: North 10-16-00 east 343.06 feet to a point; thence north 7-57-10 west 285.16 feet to a point; thence leaving said line and running along the easterly and northerly lines of lands of Kapfenstein, the following: North 33-58-00 West 587.84 feet to a point; thence South 66-14-00 West 207.28 feet to a point on the easterly line of aforesaid All Angels Hill Road; thence leaving said line and running along the easterly line of said All Angels Hill Road, the following: North 17-22-10 West 332.94 feet to a point; thence North 13-06-20 West 366.71 feet to a point; thence north 1-33-00 East 115.23 feet to a point; thence North 9-15-50 East 111.63 feet; thence North 12703-40 West 13.16 feet to the point of beginning containing 59.515 acres of land, be the same more or less." Section 2. This amendment shall become effective upon adoption, posting and publication, as prescribed by Town Law. Seconded by: Councilman Clausen Roll Call _:Vote: 0 Supervisor Diehl Ave 'Councilman Clausen- Ave Councilman Finnan Ave Councilman Heady = = AVe 'COunoilman Mills Ave Ordinance Duly Adopted: Feb. 20, 1969 MR. CLAUSEN moved that a letter be sent to Mr. Rudolph Russo, Chairman, of the Part County Sewer District Committee, advising him that the Town of Wappinger wishes to remove itself from becoming a part of the Part County Sewer District, as it is now proposed. We, as a Town Board, believe that the proposed plan is too expensive, and also premature for the Town at the present time. The Town Board feels that the needs of the Town of Wappinger can best be met at the present time by .a North Wappinger Sewer Improvement. The Board also asks that copies by sent to Dutchess County Board of Representatives; the Engineering Firm of Adler Brenner & Asso- ciates; -the Law Firm of Quinn and Reilly; and, the -Department of Audit and-Contro4 of the State of New York. Seconded by Mr. Mills Roll Call Vote: Supervisor Diehl Ave Councilman Clausen Ave - Councilman Finnan • Ave Councilman Heady Ave Councilman Mills Ave Motion Unanimously Carried: Feb. 20, 1969 In the matter of the establishment of a Sewer Improvement in the Town of Wappinger, County of Dutchess and State of New York, pursuant to Article 12-C of the Town Law, MR. HEADY moved the Resolution, seconded by -Mr. Diehl and upon Roll Call Vote, was unanimously - adopted. The full Resolution is annexed hereto and made a part hereof of the minutes of this meeting. Mr. Heady, in voting, also requested that the firm of Quinn & Reilly, being special council for this, be asked to use every resource at their disposal tp push this thing through to Audit & Control as soon as possible. 30 2 Mr. Clausen asked Mr. Quinn, now that this Resolution is adopted, what are the mechanics of the proposal. Mr. Quinn answered that there would be certain other resolutions that have to be presented, as quickly as possible, to the Board, one being the dissolution of the Oakwood Knolls Sewer District and the Rockingham District, contingent upon the approval of this matter by the Comptrollers office. The discontinuance of the old proceedings of the year 1968, with respect to the North Wappinger Sewer District. There is a period of time in which there can be a special election as to those propositions in which the entire town would be allowed to vote. The first step being the filing of this resolution with the Comptrollers Office, then Resolutions offered for the dissolution of the existing districts. MR. HEADY moved that the Engineer to. the Town prepare specifications for bidding for a 3 way traffic light with a time controller, to be installed,.at the intersection of Myers Corners Rd. and All Angels Hill Rd. and also authorize the Town Clerk when the specifications are prepared, to seek public bids for said light. Seconded by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried The Supervisor forwarded for transfer for accounts that had been overexpended and overdrawn. The following resolutions were proposed by MR. FINNAN who moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the sum of $884.73 has been appropriated to Account #811 - Tax Collector -Office aid Other, this account has been overexpended and overdrawn by the sum of $207.50. In order to meet bills presented for payment, the additional monies were obtained from Acct. #812 - Tax Collector - Compensation of Employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that -the sum of $207.50 be and the same hereby is transferred from Account #812 to Account #811, in order to eliminatethe overdraft and reimburse said account and in order to rectify and ,confirm the previously unauthorized appropriation. WHEREAS, the sum of $18,250.00 has been appropriated to Account #1002 - Parks and Playgrounds - Other (Contractual),, this account has been overexpended and overdrawn by the sum of $2,668.64. In order to meet bills presented for payment, the additional monies were obtained from Account #1001 - Parks and Playgrounds -Comp. of Employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the sum of $2,668.64 be and the same hereby is transferred from Account #1001 to Account -#1002, in order to eliminate the overdraft and reimburse said account and in order to rectify and confirm the previously unauthorized appropriation. WHEREAS, the sum of $4,103.02 has been appropriated to Account #1301 - Town Share - Social Security, this account has been overexpended and overdrawn by -the sum of $151.95. In order to meet bills presented for payment, the additional monies were obtained from Account #1304 Town Share - Compensation Insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the sum 'of $151.95 be and the same hereby is transferred from Account #1304 to Account #1301 in order to eliminate the overdraft and reimburse said account and in order to rectify and confirm the previously unauthorized appropriation. WHEREAS, the sum of$.00 has been appropriated to Account #903 - Census, this account has been overexpended and overdrawn by the sum of $1,840.00. In order to meet bills presented for - payment, the additional monies were obtained from Account #1202 - Contingent. NOW, THEREFORE,'BE IT RESOLVED, that the sum of $1,840.00 be and the same hereby is transferred from Account #1202 to Account #903, in order to eliminate the overdraft and reimburse said account and in order to rectify and confirm the previously unauthorized appropriation. MR. CLAUSEN moved that the minutes of Dec. 30, 1968, Jan. 2, 1969, Jan. 13, 1969, Jan. 27, 1969 and Jan. 30, 1969, as submitted by the Town Clerk be and they are hereby approved. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried The Building Inspector, Supervisors and Town Justices Reports for the month of January were received. MR. CLAUSEN moved they be received and placed on file. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Bills inthefollowing amounts were presented: General Fund Highway $38,236.55 Oakwood Water $ 148.28 5,492.04 Oakwood Sewer 197.41 RFSD. 278.42 MR. CLAUSEN MOVED the bills be paid, subject to audit. Seconded by Mr.,Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried The Annual Report from the Grinnell Library, and the Annual Report from Town Justice Bulger and Town Justice Francesewere received. MR. CLAUSEN moved these Annual Reports be received and placed on file. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion: Unanimously Carried MR. MILLS moved for a ten minute recess, seconded by Mr. Clausen and unanimously carried. Recessed at 8:12 P.M. Supervisor Diehl called the meeting back to order at 8:31 P.M. Mr. Clausen asked Mr. Quinn to -enlarge on a few points regarding possible referenda in connection with the Oakwood and Rockingham Sewer Districts. Mr. Quinn reiterated that if the Board acted on future resolutions for dissolution of the Districts, they will be enacted pursuant to Section 209x of the Town Law and it is the consensus of the draftsman of that section of bonding council, and the Comptrollers Office, and his office, that there are no provisions in the particular section which would limit referenda proceedure to the confines of the District disolved, so therefore, the permissive Referenda Sections of the Town Law, Article 7 Sections 90 & 91 are controlling and they provide for a Town -wide Referendum in such instances. There would be two propositions placed before the voters, assuming that an appropriate petition for Referendum came in, one proposition for the dissolution of the Oakwood Sewer District and one for the dissolution of the Rockingham Sewer District. If one or both propositions were to be defeated the Town Board would then have to hold further Public Hearings and decide whether to amend their plan and leave out one or the other of those districts from the proposed Improvement area. MR. HEADY moved the rules be suspended, seconded by Mr. Mills and carried to permit Mr. Cornell to comment about the rights of Rockingham to vote themselves in or out of the North Wappinger Sewer Improvement. Mr. Cornell asked the Board to pass a resolution that only the Rockingham District be permitted to vote on a Referendum to remain a district or not. Mr. Quinn, when questioned, stated that it made no difference, whether- 12, 12A or 12C,,, a town wide Referendum was indicated under Town Law. MR.. CLAUSEN moved the rules be resumed. Seconded by Mr. Mills and unanimously carried. - Mr. Clausen respectfully requested that Mr. Quinn submit to the Town Board- his decision (on the Town wide Referendum) in writing and also asked Mr. Cornell to submit any material he may have that would be opposite of what Mr. Quinn had stated. A letter was received from Mr. R. C. Chase, Chairman of the Village of Wappingers Falls Recreation Commission, asking for information regarding the Town Recreation program plans. MR. DIEHL moved Mr. Chases' letter be referred to the Town, Recreation Commission. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried The following memo was received from Mr. Ludewig: MEMO TO: Town Board, Town of Wappinger FROM: Joseph E. Ludewig, Building Inspector DATE: January 23, 1969 Gentlemen: I should like to request that the Town Board take the necessary action to permit Highway Superintendent Horton to commence construction of the road for vehicular access to the Oakwood Knolls Water District Pump House. It is my understanding that the costs incurred will be charged to the Water District. Mr. Lapar staked out the right-of-way last fall. Respectfully, s/ Joseph E. Ludewig: MR. CLAU-SEN moved that Mr. Horton, Superintendent of Highways, be given the authority to produce a road into the -Oakwood -Knolls Water District Pump; House. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Eck, representing'the Town of Wappinger,Taxpayers Association first commended the Board in passing a resolution removing. the Town. from the Part County Sewer District, and said that Mr. L'Arche- vesque had. been instrumental in initiating it, and was now against Cogar Co. establishing in the Town. He then charged that Mr. Quinn sU had not informed the Town Board a year ago about a possibility of a Referendum on the Sewer Improvement and holding up the North Wappinger Sewer District until the County had proposed. a Part County Sewer District so that Audit & Control would deny the Towns' petition. Mr. Diehl permitted, Mr. L'Archevesque rebuttal to Mr. Ecks.' statements. Mr. L'Archevesque said he was in concurrance with the Boards resolu- tion, quoting "as proposed" was his opposition also. He also commented that when Mr. Eck speaks for the Taxpayers Association he Auld like to see some documentation from the Association so that one knows when the Association is talking and when Mr. Eck is talking. Mr. Worona, representing Angel Brook Acres Corp. regarding the Performance Bond renewal, stated a renewal has been issued by the Bonding Co. and a copy sent to the Attorney to the Town Clerk and Town Board. Mr. Rappleyea had been in contact with the Bonding Co. and was satisfied that the Performance Bond had been renewed. MR. CLAUSEN moved that the Alpert renewal of their Performance Bond be turned over to the Attorney to the Town for action. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried A letter from Mr. Worona, representing Angel Brook Acres Corp. was received, requesting that the rezoning petition of Angel Brook Acres Corp. submitted for PI, Planned Industry, be changed to the proposed OR. It is their intention to now have said petition be changed only in those respects to which reference is made to PI so that now the same would read OR. MR. DIEHL moved the Board acknowledge receipt of Mr. Worona's letter and directed the clerk to place it on file for further action. Seconded by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried A letter was received from John A. French, Sec, Board of Fire Commissioners, New Hackensack Fire District, which had been directed to New York State Dept. of Transportation, requesting some_ type of traffic control system be installed at the intersection of Rt. 9 and Myers Corners Rd. to enable the fire police of this district to 40 control the traffic light during emergency responses to fires. MR. DIEHL moved that the Town Clerk contact the New York State Dept. of Transportation and notify them of receipt of letter from the New Hackensack Fire District, that the Board concurs with their request, and write to the New York State Dept. of Transportation supporting their request. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried Alletter was received from Mr. A. W. Bidwell, President of the Cedar Hill -Pine Ridge Drive Civic Association requesting street lamps be installed at the intersections of Cedar Hill Road and Old Hopewell Rd. and Pine Ridge Drive and Old Hopewell Rd. Mr. Clausen, as a member of the Lighting Committee, stated that he was working with John Barbaro, Central Hudson Representative, and one of the recommendations is to install a light at the intersection of Cedar Hill Rd. & Old Hopewell Rd. In the near future, plans will be presented, for additionalstreet lighting in the Town. Communications were received from the Town Planning Board. The first one was recommendation on a proposed zoning classification (OR) . PROPOSED ZONE OFFICE RESEARCH -- O -R ZONE The intent of this district is to encourage and facilitate the orderly development of office and industrial research enter- prises in a setting conducive to public safety, economic stabil- ity and growth; protection from blight, deterioration, and en- croachment of non -compatible uses, and efficient traffic movement. Section I In an O -R Office Research District, no building or premise shall be used, and no building shall be erected or altered, which is arranged, intended, or designed to be used, inwhole or in part for any uses, except the following: A. Uses allowed in right. None B. Uses allowed subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: 1. Offices - Places where financial, insurance, real estate, data processing, or like businesses, or professional, accounting, or like services are supplied or performed, including, but not limited to, buildings or rooms in which clerical work is performed, or buildings or rooms utilized for the work of adminis- tration. laboratories. 2. Research and/or development and/or engineering 3. Normal accessory buildings and accessory uses. 30$ C. Any change of Tenancy shall require a new application to the Building Inspector for a Certificate of Occupancy. Section II :Uses subject to site plan approval must conform to the following provisions: a) No smoke, gas, dust, fumes, odors, or other atmospheric pollutant, noise, vibration, glare, radiation beyond building -in which such use is conducted._ b) Such use shall not constitute a fire, explosion, or other physical hazard. c) No water pollution or other health hazard shall result from the operation of such use. d) No work or services shall be carried on except in an enclosed, permanent structure, except for the maintenance of the grounds. Section III Buildings or Structures Height No building.or structure shall be erected to a height in excess of three (3) stories totaling thirty-five (35) feet. Section IV Lot Area and Frontage Lot must front on public street. Width of street frontage :and lot area rare subject' to approval of_ Planning Board. Section V Maximum Coverage All buildings on any lot, including main and accessory buildings, shall occupy no more than twenty-five per cent (25/) of the area of such lot. Parking area may not .exceed thirty-five per cent (35/) of 'lot 'area. Open space: Area without any structure and parking area, must be aintained at least to the extent of 40% of lot area. Section VI Yards Yards shall be subject to site plan approval. No buildings on any lot shall be erected nearer to any street right - of way line than 125 feet, or nearer than 200 feet to any Residence Zone Boundary. Section VII Screening and Landscaping Sufficient_ hedges, - fences;: or walls, -of. a design -and material subject to approval by the Planning Board, shall be provided. $109 All required screening and landscaping shall be maintained throughout the life of any use for which a Certificate of Occupancy is granted. Section VIII Ingress and Egress For each lot there shall be adequate ingress and egress driveways with a minumum width as follows: A. For one-way driveways - 16 ft. pavement width. B.. For two-way driveways - 25 ft. pavement width. Section IX Off -Street Parking Requirements No parking area shall be closer to a Residence Boundary than fifty (50) feet. There shall be provided not less than two square feet of parking area (inclusive of aisles, but exclusive of access drives or roads) for every square foot of gross floor area with not less than the following number of spaces for the following exceptions: A. Banks, business offices not otherwise specified, one space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area plus one parking'space for every three employees. B. Business service offices - one space for every 500 square feet of gross floor area plus one space for each two employees. C. Offices of architects, attorneys, accountants, engineers, real estate offices, insurance offices, and other professional offices in which the ratio of visitors to employees is similarly low - one space for every 500 square feet of gross floor area, plus one parking space for each two employees. D. Professional offices of Practitioners of Healing Arts and Sciences: ten (10) spaces shall be provided for the first practitioner; eight (8) spaces each for the second and third practitioners, ,and six (6) spaces for each additional practitioner. E. Research and/or development laboratories: One space for every two employees for which the building is designed, but not less than one space for every 600 square feet gross floor area. Section X Off -Street Loading Requirements All loading and unloading shall take place entirely on the lot, either on the side or in the rear of any building, and not mearer than 100 feet from any Residence District Boundary. Section XI Outside Storage No material, supplies, goods, debris, or work products shall be located or stored outside of any building. All areas used for refuse disposal or storage of waste cans or other waste apparatus shall be enclosed by suitable screening or fencing as required by Planning Board in Site Plan Approval. No trailer, temporary structure, trailer truck or other structure which has not. -been approved by the Planning Board shall be used or placed on the premises for storage or any purposes _except during the period of constructiion of any permanent building on the premises. MR. DIEHL moved that the Town Clerk acknowledge receipt of the i3 recommendation from the Planning Board (on the proposed zoning classification) and the proposed zone - Office Research (-R be placed on record. Seconded by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried Reply was received from the Planning Board regarding Town Boards inquiry on Alpert & Vorndran rezoning request. MR. CLAUSEN moved the Board acknowledge receipt of this letter, and table for further discussion. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Diehl recognized Mr. Coombs. Jim Coombs, Attorney for John Vorndran, respectfully requested a Public Hearing be set on the Vorndran application for rezoning as soon as possible, as it had been before the Board since Feb. 1968. And, in reference to the Town Boards inquiry as to traffic problems in this area arrangements have been made with the County Highway Dept. for straightening out the road in the area of Vorndran's property; secondly, it's impossible to inform the Board who would be coming in, because no commitments could be made until a zoning change has been effected. Mr. Worona joined in Mr. Coombs'request' for a Public Hearing asking that one be set for Angel Brook rezoning petition also. The third communication from the Planning Board was a recommendation regarding Chelsea Ridge rezoning petition of rezoning a portion of their property from R-20 to RD -40. MR. DIEHL moved action be tabled on Chelsea Ridge until the recommendation on their second request for LB rezoning be received. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried A letter of resignation was received from Mr. Kenneth Jennings, member ,of -the Recrea=tion Commission. MR. DIEHL moved Mr. Jennings' resignation be accepted with regret. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried The Clerk was directed to write Mr. Jennings thanking him for his dedicated service to the Town. MR. CLAUSEN moved that Mr. James Porter be appointed to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Jennings as a member of the Recreation Commis- sion, term to expire May 1st, 1971. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried A letter was received on behalf of the Wappinger Little League, from Jim Porter, requesting a meeting with the Town Board and Hugh J. Maurer, Chairman of the Recreation Commission, to review the matter of playing facilities for the Wappingers Falls Little League. MR. DIEHL moved an executive meeting be set for Tuesday, March 4, • 1969, at 8 P.M. Town Hall, with Hugh J. Maurer and Jim Porter and officials of the Wappingers Falls Little League. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried The Board had met for the purpose of auditing the Justices Dockets. MR. FINNAN moved that as a matter of record the Town Justices Dockets were audited by the Town Board and found in order. Seconded by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried The vacancy on the Board of Assessors remains to be filled. MR. FINNAN moved that Arthur J. Bisom be appointed to fill the unexpired term of Lewis Ingersoll. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Roll Call Vote: Supervisor Diehl Ave Councilman Clausen Ave Councilman Finnan Aye Councilman Heady Ave Councilman Mills Nay Motion Carried MR. FINNAN moved the rules be suspended, seconded by Mr. Heady and unanimously carried to hear Mrs. Florence Graff. Mrs. Graff asked several questions regarding the rezoning of the property on All Angels Hill Rd. and Myers Corners Rd. MR. FINNAN moved the rules be resumed, seconded by Mr. Mills and unanimously carried. A vacancy remains on the Recreation Commission due to the resig- nation of Miss Lois Cunningham. MR. MILLS moved that Mr. Harry Marsh, Pine Hill Rd. be appointed to fill the unexpired term of Miss Cunningham, term expires May 1st, 1970. Seconded by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Arthur Kalaka's term of office as a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals expired Feb. 1, 1969. MR. HEADY moved that Mr. Arthur Kalaka be reappointed for a 5 yr. term as a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, term expires Feb. 1, 1974. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Diehl asked Mr. Rappleyea to answer Mrs. Graff's questions regarding citizens recourse regarding the action taken by the Town Board on the rezoning of a parcel of land on Myers Corners Rd. and All Angels Hill Rd. Mr. Rappleyea reiterated discussion held at the Public Hearing emphazing his position as Attorney to the Board and his responsibil- ity to sustain their actions, and his belief that the zoning amend- ment was valid. Bids had been solicited and received for various Highway items, and fuel oil for the Town Buildings. Two bids were received for #2 fuel oil - Mid -Valley Petroleum and Mid -Hudson Oil. The Highway Superintendent recommends the bid for #2 fuel oil be awarded to Mid -Hudson Oil Co. as low bidder. MR. MILLS moved the Highway Superintendent recommendation be accepted and the bid for #2 fuel oil at .149 per gallon be awarded to Mid -Hudson Oil Co. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried Three bids were received for Rock Salt - Brighton Steel, Morton Salt and Highway Materials. The Superintendent recommends the bid for Rock Salt be awarded to Highway Materials as low bidder. MR. HEADY moved the Highway Superintendent recommendation be accepted and the bid for Rock Salt be awarded to Highway Materials @ 80 lb bag $24.64 per ton, 100 1106 bg. $24.64 per ton, $17.00 per ton bulk as low bid. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried One bid was received from Mid -Hudson Oil Co. for gasoline. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Mid -Hudson Oil Co. MR. MILLS moved the Highway Superintendents' recommendation be accepted and tb0. bid for gasoline be awarded to Mid -Hudson Oil Co. @ .1354 per gallon.:. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried One bid was received, for Bituminous Road Materials from Spoor Lasher. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Spoor Lasher as low bidder. MR. HEADY moved the Highway Superintendent's recommendation be accepted and the bid for Bituminous Road Materials be awarded to Spoor Lasher N.Y.S. Item 74,73,73A, $.25 per gallon; latex conditioner $.24 per gallon; base conditioner $.22 per gallon as low bidder. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Two bids were received for Calcium Chloride, Package Pavement and Brighton Steel. The Superintendent recommends the bid for Calcium Chloride be awarded to Brighton Steel. MR. HEADY moved the Highway Superintendent's recommendation be accepted and tbt bid be awarded to Brighton Steel for Calcium Chloride C $49.00 per ton F.O.B; $50.00 per ton delivered (less than al 12 ton lots) $44.85 per ton delivered (12-20 ton lots) as low bidder. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Two bids were received for Bituminous Concrete, Dutchess Quarry and Spoor Lasher. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to both bidders. MR. MILLS moved the Highway Superintendent's recommendation be accepted and the bid be awarded jointly to Dutchess Quarry and Spoor Lasher $8.00 & $8.05, Hot Mix F.O.B; $8.15 & $8.25 cold mix F.O.B. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried One bid was received for a Truck Mounted Street Sweeper from Ralph C. Herman Co. The Superintendent recommends the bid for a Truck Mounted Street Sweeper be awarded to Ralph C. Herman Co. MR. HEADY moved the Highway Superintendent recommendation be accepted and the bid be awarded to Ralph C. Herman Co. @ $16,837.00 less trade-in allowance of $1,850.00 for the bid price of $14,987.00. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Two bids were received for Tires & Tubes, B. F. Goodrich and Lazaro. The Highway Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to B. F. Goodrich on the basis of low bid in the tire sizes needed most and road service. MR. MILLS moved the recommendation of the Highway Superintendent be accepted and the bid for tires and tubes be awarded to B. F. Goodrich as low bidder on the sizes needed most and road service. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried One bid was received for Concrete Pipe, Dutchess Quarry The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Dutchess Quarry for concrete pipe. 1.5 Five bids were received for Corrugated Metal Pipe, Capitol Highways, Brighton Steel, Chemung & Edgerton. The Highway Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Chemung Supply Corp. MR. MILLS moved that the Highway Superintendent recommendations be accepted and the bid for Concrete Pipe be awarded to Dutchess Quarry and Corrugated Metal Pipe be awarded to Chemung Supply Corp. as law bidders. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried Three bids were received for washed sand, - Circle Sand & Gravel, Camelot and Spoor Lasher. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Camelot. MR. HEADY moved the recommendation of the Highway Superintendent be accepted and the bid be awarded to Camelot for Washed Sand @ $1.50 per ton picked up, $2.20 per ton delivered, as low bidder. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Two bids were received for Crushed Stone, Dutchess Quarry and Spoor Lasher. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Spoor Laher on the basis of hauling distance. MR. MILLS moved the Highway Superintendent's recommendation be accepted and the bid for Crushed Stone be awarded to Spoor Lasher on the basis of hauling distance. Seconded by Mr. Heady. Motion Unanimously Carried Three bids were received for Washed Gravel, Circle Sand & Gravel, Camelot and Dutchess Quarry. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to Camelot as low bid per ton and to Circle Sand & Gravel as low bid per cubic yard. MR. MILLS moved that the Highway Superintendent's recommendation be accepted and the bids for Washed Gravel be awarded to Circle Sand and Gravel and Camelot as low bidders. Seconded by Mr. Finnan. Motion Unanimously Carried Three bids were received for run of Bank Gravel, Dave Alexander, Si. 6 Circle Sand & Gravel and Camelot. The Superintendent recommends the bid be awarded to all three bidders. MR. HEADY moved the Highway Superintendent's recommendation be accepted and the bids for R.O.B. Gravel be awarded to Dave Alexander Circle Sand .& Gravel and Camelot. Seconded by Mr. Mills. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Ronald Brown, Cooperative Extension Resource Development - Advisory Committee Member, asked for the.opportunity to address the Board to briefly explain the objective of the program and invite the Board to a series of Seminars which is to become more familiar with the whys of planning, to develop a clearer understanding of objectives and responsibilities of existing planning agencies and to create awareness of the operational procedures of these various planning agencies. The three sessions will be March 19, March 26 and April 2, 1969. MR. HEADY moved the rules be suspended. Seconded by Mr. Mills and unanimously carried to permit a few words from Mr. Bisom. Mr. Bisom asked what could be done about more police protection in the Town. His establishment has been broken into on numerous occasions, and others also. He asked that the Board contact the Sheriffs Office and the State Police and request more patrols. Mr. Diehl said the Board could contact the two police agencies and request a reasonable explanation of the length of time in responding to a call of this nature, and ask for an answer as to how to improve the police protection in the Town of Wappinger through the coopera- tion of the State Police Dept. and the Sheriffs Dept. MR. CLAD SEN moved the rules be resumed, seconded by Mr. Mills and carried. MR. DIEHL moved that the Board request from the Sheriffs Office and the State Police a reasonable explanation as to the length of time elapsing in responding to calls of the nature of robberies, and ask for an answer as to how to improve the police protection in the Town of Wappinger through the cooperation of the Sheriff 11 7 and the State Police. Seconded_by Mr. Clausen. Motion Unanimously Carried Mr. Finnan indicated the receipt of a letter from Hugh J. Maurer in regard to a meeting with the Recreation Commission and Mrs. Reese, to view films on a Conservation Park area, and discussion (regarding Reese Park) Mrs. Reese requested March 13, 1969. Clerk to confirm date with Recreation Commission. MR. FINNAN moved the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Mr. Milts and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 P.M. _ OL):Jo.4J\ Elaine H. Snowden Town Clerk PRESENT: ,o/ AT a Special Meeting of the Town Board of' the Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, held at the Town Hall, in the Village of Wappingers Falls, in said Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, on the 20th day of February, 1969. LOUIS DIEHL, Supervisor LOUIS C. CLAUSEN, Councilman G. DONALD FINNAN, Councilman LEONCE L. HEADY, Councilman JAMES MILLS, JR., Councilman ABSENT: NONE IN THE MATTER of THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEWER IMPROVEMENT IN THE TOWN OF WAPPINGER, COUNTY OF DUTCHESS AND STATE OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 12-C OF THE TOWN LAW. 00, WHEREAS, a map, plan and report have been prepared in such a manner and in such detail as have been determined heretofore by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger relating to the establishment of a proposed sewer improvement in an area of said town outside of any village, and WHEREAS, said map, plan and report have been prepared by Adler -Brenner & Associates and Rudolph E. Lapar, competent professional engineers duly licensed by the State of New York, showing the boundaries of the proposed benefited area within which the proposed sewer improvement is to be furnished, a general plan of the proposed sewer system, and a report of the proposed method of operation thereof, and WHEREAS, said map, plan and report show all outlets and the terminus and course of each pr,>;)osed main sewer or drain, 'to ,eter with the location and a general description of all sewage disposal pl ants, ;luiA• J stations and other public works required, and WHEREAS, the boundaries of the proposed be described in Schedule A which is annexed hereto and mu a part her eoi and incorporated herein by reference to the same e '..c,.4 s..::; t::. -::ere more fully set forth herein, and WHEREAS, the proposed improvement as forth i,7 plan and report consist of the acquisition and construction of main sewers., trunk sewers and intercepting sewers, sewage treatment and disposal plants, pumping stations, and the acquisition of rights of way, easements, real property and interests in real property, and WHEREAS, the maximum amount proposed to bye expended for the aforesaid improvement and for the acquisition of the aforesaid interests in real property is the sum of One Million Five Hundred Ninaty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($1, 598, 000. 00), and WHEREAS, the proposed method of apportionment of the cost of the proposed improvement is that such cost shall be borne entirely by the lands benefited thereby, the 'boundaries of which are described in Schedule A attached hereto and hereinbefore referred to, and WHEREAS, the proposed method of financing the cost of such improvement and acquisitions consist of the issuance of serial bonds of said Town of Wappinger to mature in annual installments over a period not exceeding forty (40) years, payable in the first instance by the assessme. and levy upon and the collection from the several lots and parcels of real property within the benefited area in just proportion to the amount of b which the sewer improvement shall confer upon such parcels, and WHEREAS, the aforesaid map, plan and report have been duly -2- if filed in the office of the Town Clerk of the Town of Wappinger, and WHEREAS, an order was duly adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger on November 12, 1968, reciting the filing of said map, ii plan and report, thesewer improvement proposed, a description of the boundaries of the proposed benefited area, the maximum amount proposed to be expended for the aforesaid improvement, the proposed method of apportioning the costs of such sewer improvement, the proposed method - I of financing to be employed, the fact that the aforesaid map, plan and report were and are on file in the office of the Town Clerk of this Town for public � r inspection, and further reciting and stating all other matters required by law to be stated, and specifying December 3, 1968, at 8:00 o'clock in the afternoon of that day, as the time, and the Town Hall of the Town of Wappinger; as the place where:the said Town Board would meet to consider the aforesaid map, plan and report, and to hear all persons interested in the subject ¢, thereof concerning the same, and to take such action thereon as is required or authorized by law, and WHEREAS, such order was duly published and posted as required by law, and WHEREAS, a public hearing on said matter was duly held by this Town Board on the 3rd day of December, 1968, commencing at 8:00 o'clock P. M., E. S. T, , at the Town Hall in this Town, and shortly thereafter on the same date, such public hearing was temporarily adjourned and the location and place thereof was changed and removed to the Wappingers Central School District No. 1 Junior High School, in the Town of Wappinger, 1 =i for the purpose of accomodating the large number of interested persons in si1 attendance at said public hearing, and said public hearing was thereafter reopened at such latter place at 9:30 o'clock P. M., E. S. T., on December 3, 1968, and thereafter, such public hearing was adjourned until the 12th -3- day of December, 1968, at 8:00 o'clock P. M., E. S. T., at the Wappingers Central School, District No. 1 Junior High School in the Town of Wappinger, and on such latter date and at such place said public hearing was continued, completed and closed, and a full discussion of the subject matter thereof having been had, and all persons desiring to be heard having been duly heard, and this Town Board having considered the evidence presented at such , hearing, and having duly deliberated thereon, Now, upon the motion of Mr. Heady seconded by Mr. Diehl , it is RESOLVED and DETERMINED, as follows: 1. That the order fixing the time and place for a public hearing on the establishment of said proposed sewer improvement was published and posted as required by law, and that such order is otherwise sufficient' and complies with the requirements of Article 12- C of the Town Law. 2. That all of the property and property owners within the boundaries of the proposed benefited area within which the proposed sewer improve- ment is to be furnished are benefited thereby. 3. That all of the property and property owners benefited by the proposed sewer improvement are included within the limits and boundaries of the 'proposed benefited area described in said order. 4. That it is in the public interest to make and establish such sewer improvement. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED and DETERMINED, that the establishment and making of the aforesaid sewer improvement, as set forth and described in the aforesaid map, plan and report be and the same hereby is authorized and approved; 'that the sewer improvement facilities therein mentioned and described be acquired and constructed, and the necessary rights of way, easements, real property and interests in real property be acquired, upon the required funds being made available and -4- provided for; that the service therein mentioned be provided for; that the benefited area within which the said sewer improvement is to be provided shall be bounded and described in the manner set forth in Schedule A which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof and incorporated herein by re- ference to the same extent as if it were more fully set forth herein, and it is further RESOLVED, that the proposed sewer improvement, including the cost of acquisition and construction of main sewers, trunk sewers and intercepting sewers, sewerage treatment and disposal plants, pumping stations, and the cost of acquisition ;of rights of way, easements, real :�. property and interests in real ro ertY, legal and engineering fees, and all other expenses, shall be apportioned among and. shall be borne entirely by the lands benefited thereby, the boundaries of which are described in Schedule A attached hereto and hereinbefore referred to, and such costs and expenses shall be financed by the issuance of serial bonds of said Town of Wappinger to mature in annual installments over a period not exceeding forty (40) years, as may hereafter be determined by the Town tl� Board of the Town of Wappinger, payable in the first instance from assess- ments levied upon and collected from the several lots and parcels of real property within the benefited area within which the said sewer improvement is to be provided in just proportion to the amount of benefit which the sewer improvement shall confer upon such lots and parcels of real property; and it is further RESOLVED that this resolution and the sewer -improvement authorized hereby are subject to the approval of the Comptroller of the State of New York, and it is further RESOLVED that'the Town Clerk of the Town of appinger be and she hereby is authorized and directed to file a certified co y of this resolution in the office of the New York State Department of AL dit and Control at Albany, New York, within ten (10) days after the data of -5- adoption of this resolution, together with an application for the approval of the Comptroller of the State of New York for the provision and establishment of the aforesaid sewer improvement, and it is further RESOLVED that the Supervisor of the Town of Wappinger b:[ and he hereby is authorized and directed to execute and verify the aforesaid application to the Comptroller of the State of New York on behalf of the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger, such application to be in suc form and to contain such information as shall be prescribed by the Comptr ller of the State of New York, and it is further \` RESOLVED that the Supervisor of the Town of Wappinger be and he hereby is authorized and directed to file and record a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the Clerk of the County of Dutchess, within ten (10) days of the receipt of notification of the aforesaid approval of the Comptroller of the State of New York. The question of the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly put to vote on roll call which resulted as ifollows: Mr. Diehl Voting Aye Mr. Clausen Voting Aye Mr. Finnan Voting Aye Mr. Heady Voting Aye Mr. Mills Voting Aye The resolution was thereupon declared duly adopted. -6- Beginning at a point, said.point.lying at the intersection of the Town of LaGrange, the Town of Wappinger and the Town of Poughkeepsie, said point also lying in the centerline o' Wappinger Creek and running thence along the boundary line betweer. the Town of LaGrange and the Town of Wappinger in an easterly direction a distance of 12000± feet to a point, said'point lying on the inter- section of the easterly right-of -way of Diddell Road and the Town Line of the Town of Wappinger and the Town-of LaGrange; thence turning and running along the easterly right-of-way of Diddell Road in a southwesterly direction a distance of 4346± feet to a point, said point lying on the easterly right.-of-way of Diddell Road and also being the northerly corner of a lot designated as lot 2, block 1, Town of Wappinger, tax map 15; thence in a south- easterly direction along lot lines of lots 2, 3, 4,-block 1, tax map 15 a distance of 5755±-feet to a point,said point being the southeasterly corner of lot 4, block 1,.tax map 15; thence in a southwesterly direction along the southerly lines of lots 4 and .6, block 1, tax map 15'a distance of 1955- feet to a point, said point being the southerly corner of lot 6, block 1, tax map 15 said point also being the easterly corner of lot 1, block 1, tax map. 16; thence continuing in a southwesterly direction along the southerly lines of lots 1, 2, and 5, block 1, tax map 16 a distance of 3210± feet to a point, said point being the southerly corner of lot 5, block 1, tax map 16, said point also being the easterly line of lot 50, block 1, tax map 22; thence in a southeasterly direction along the easterly line of lot 50, block 1, tax map 22 a distance 1 SCHEDULE, A •••••••., of 30t feet to a point, said point being the easterly corner of lot 50, block 1, tax map 22; thence in •a southwesterly direction along the northerly and westerly line of lot 85, block 1, tax map 22 a distance of 1844t feet to a point, said pointbeing the 'southwesterly corner, of lot 85, block 1, Itax map 22, and the northwesterly corner of.lot 97, block 1, tax map 22; thence in a southerly direction along the westerly line of lot 97, block 1, tax map 22 a distance Of 480t feet to a point said point lying on the southerly line of Meyers Corner Road; thence in a;southerly direction along the westerly line of lot 4.1, block 1, tax map 24 S distance of 9801 feet to a point, said point being the south easterly corner of lot 20, block 1, tax map 24; thence in a south- westerly direction along the southerly line of lot 20, block 1, tax map 24 and crossing MontfordRoad adistance of 378± feet to a'point, said point lying on the westerly line of Montford Road; thence in a southerly direction along the westerly line of Montford Road a distance of 590± feet to a point, said point lying on the 1 northerly line of lot 19, block 1, tax map 24; thence in a south- westerly direction along the northerly line of lot 19, block 1, tax map 24 a distance of 14011: feet to a point, said point being the northwesterly corner of lot 19, block.1 tax map 24; thence in a southerly direction along the westerly line of lot 190 block 1, tax map 24 a distance of 180- feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner of lot 10, block.5, tax map 28, said point also being the southeasterly corner of lot 9, block 5, tax map 28;.thence _.. in a southwesterly direction along the southerly line of the lots. fronting on Brothers Road, said lots being designated as lots 9, 8.2, 8.1, 8.3, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1, block 5, tax map 28, con- tinuing across an unnmaed street and along the southerly lines of lots 32, 31, 30, 29,, 28, and 27, block 4, tax map 28 a distance of 3119± feet to a point, said point being the southerly corner of lot 27, block 4, tax map 28, said point also being the south- easterly corner'of lot34, block 1, tax map -29; thence in a south- westerly direction along the southerly line of lot 34, block 1, tax map 29, a distance of 490± feet to a point, said point being the intersection ' of ' the southerly boundary of lot 34, block 1, tax map 29 and the easterly corner of lot 32.16, block -1, tax map 29; thence in a southwesterly direction along the rear lot line of .the lots fronting on'Cider Mill Loop designated as.lots 32.16, 32.17, 32.18,.across an unnamed street, 32.19, 32.20, 32.21, 32.22, 32.23, 32.24, 32. 25, 32.26, 32.27, block1, tax map 29, and across All *AngelsRoad a distance of 1490± feet to a point, said point being ,on the westerly right-of-way line of All Angels Road; thence in a q southeasterly direction along the westerly line of A11 Angels Road a distance of 850± feet to a point, said point being the inter- section of the westerly'right-of -way line of A11 AngelsRoad and the northerly right-of-way line of Hilltop Drive extended; thence 'in a northeasterly direction across All Angels Road and along the northerly right-of-way I line of Hilltop Drive a distance of 5104' feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner of lot 5.21, block 1, tax map 25;. thence in a northwesterly direction along the westerly line of lot 5.21, block 1, tax map 25 a distance of 260± feet to a point, said point being the northwesterly corner of lot . \ . . - .:,... 5.21, block 1, tax map 25; thence in an easterly and southerly ... ' direction along the rear lot line of lots fronting on,Hilltop ., ...;'. • •••,• , : •'• • . , , - . Drive designated as lots 5.21, 5.22, 5.23, 5.24, 5.25;5.260\ 5.27, 5.28, 5.29, across Magura Road, 5.2.10, 5.2.11, -.2.12, 5.2.13, 5.2.14, 5.2.15, 5.2.16, 5.2.17, 5.2.18, 5.2.19, 5.2.20, 5.2.21, block 1, tax map 25 and across Pye Lane a distance of 2710- feet to a point, said point being. on the southerly right- - of -way line of Pye Lane, said point also being.the northwesterly corner of lot 5.2.113, block 1, tax map 25; thence in a north- easterly direction along the southerly right-of-way line of Pye Lane a distance of 5901: feet to a point, said point being the northeasterly corner of lot 5.2.98, block 1, tax map 25; thence in a southeasterly direction along the easterly boundary line of lots 5.2.98, 5.2.97 a distance of 310± feet to a point, said point being the southeasterly corner of lot 5.2.97, block 1, tax rap 25; thence in awesterly, direction along the southerly line of lot :' ,--;;.-.2.,H5.2.970 block 1, tax map 25 a distance (4'130+ feet i‘.3 ''. 8aid point lying on the easterly right-of-way line of Deer Run H1 , ,... • : .- Drivesaid point also being the southwesterly corner of 5.2.97, .. . .:,.: block 1, tax map 25; thence in a southerly and westerly direction , along the right-ofCway line of Deer Run Drive a diatance of 420t feet,to a point, said point being the northwestei.ly corner of lot il. -.7.20 block 1, tax. map 25;.thence in a southeasterly direction . - along the westerly line of lot 7.2, block 1, tax map 25 a distance - of o00- feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner , :4. . of lot 7.2„.block 1, tax map 25, said point also lying on the northerly line of lot 1.1, block 1, tax map 46; thence in a southwesterly direction along the northerly line of lot 1.1, block 1,,tai map -46'a 'distance of 8701. feat" to a point, satd point beim the southwesterly corner of lot 5.2.89, block 1, tax map 25; thence in a northwesterly direction along the rear, lot line.of lots .2.89, 5.2.88,.5.2.87, 5.2.86, 5.2.85, across Deer Run Drive, .2.84, 5.2.83,.5.2`•80,1block 1, tax map.25 a distance of 1290± eet to' a point, said point lying on the southerly right-of-way line Pye_ Lane, Said point also being the northwesterly corner of lot tax map 25; thence in a southwesterly direction - erly .right; -of -way line of Pye Lane a di4tance of 770± 'feet :to a point; thence in a northwesterly direction across Pye Lane ...and along the westerly line of lot 5.2.40 and the southerly line of lot 5.2.46, 5.2.47,' .block 10"tax tax map 25 a distance of 66 ± .feet to a point said point being the southwesterly corner of to 5.2.48, block.`1,'.tax map 25; thence in .a northwesterly direction along'the terly line of lot 5.2.48, block 1,. tax map . 25 .a diwtarpce of 3171 feet..to a point, said ,point being southeasterly corner of lot 3, :block 1, tax' map 25;.,thence iri.a northerly and westerly direction along wheeasterly and northerly�line'of lot 3, block 1, tax map 5; and.,across'All Angels 'Road .a distance of 425t feet to a point, said. point' lying on the'westerly right-of-way line of All Angels Road;" thence. in a southerly direction along the westerly line of All ;.Angels Road a distance of 1800- feet to a point, said point being the intersection.of the northerly line of lot 1.1, block 1, tax map 46 ,and .the westerly) right of -way line of All Angels Road; thence along ;northerly and westerly line of lot 1.1, block 1, tax map 46 a tanee of .1630± feet o a point,, said point being the easterly •.:--corner of. lot 3.309, block 1,. tax trap 46; thence in a sou;.h;tiesterly and southeasterly direction along the northerly and southerly lines of .lot 2.2, block -1, tax map.46 'a distance of .545± feet to a point, said .point.. -being the northwesterly .,corner. of lot ; 8,. block 1, tax • • . . • • map 46; thence in a southerly and easterly direction along the westerly and southerly line of lot 8, block 1, tax map 46 and across All'Angels Road a distance of 625- feet to a point, said. point lying on the easterly rieht-of-way line of All Angela Road; - thence in a northerly direction along the easterly right-of-way line of All Angels Road a distance of 400- feet to a point, said • • oint being the northwesterly corner of lot 3.1, block 1, tax map 46; thence in'an easterly direction along the southerly line of -lot 1.1, block 1, tax map 46 a distance of 1350± feet to a point, said point lying in the centerline of Sprout Creek said point also lying on the boundary line between the Town of Wappinger and the • •,„ Town of East Fishkill; thence along the centerline. of Sprout Creek • ....':. . said line also being the boundary line between the Town of Wappinger and the Town of East Fishkill a distance of 1085± feet to a point, & .. ; . said point being the southeasterly corner of lot 3.385, block 1, map 46; thence in a southwesterly direction along the southerly lines. .0 lots 3.3.85, 3.16, 3.17,.3.18, 3.19, 3.20, 3.21, 3,22, - 3.23, across All Angels Road, 3.56, 3.77, 3.78, 3.79, 3.80, 3.81; 3.82, 3.83, 3.84, block 1, tax map 46 a distance of 3040t feet to • - a point, said.point lying on the northeasterly corner of lot 3.86, • block 1, tax map 46; thence in a southerly direction along the easterly lines of lots 3.86, 3.87', 3.88, 3.89, 3.90, 3.91,'1)loc tax map 46 a distance' of 580± feet to a point; said point being the :southeasterly corner of lot 3.91; blockl, tax map 46, said point -also lying on the northerly right.of-way line of Route 28, called Old Hopewell Road; thence in a westerly direction alone the north - 4 erly rieht-of-waY line.:oD Old Hopewellllead..a diatance of 1000± feet to a point; said point being the southeasterly corner of lot t 4, block 1, tax map 46; thence 1.n anortherly direction along the easterly line of lots 4 and 6, block 1, tax map 46 a distance of 310± feet to a point, said point being the northeasterly corner of lot 6, block 1, tax map 46; thence in a westerly direction along the northerly line of lot 6, block 1, tax map 46 a,distance of 336± feet to a point, said point being the northwesterly corner of lot 6, block 1, tax map 46; thence in a southerly direction along the westerly line of ,lot 6 and 5 a distance of 283± feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner of lot 5, block 1, tax map 46, said point also lying on the northerly right-of-way line of Old Hopewell Road; thence in a westerly direction along the north- erly right-of-way line of Old Hopewell Road a distance of 360± feet to a point, said point being the southwesterly corner of lot 3.120, block 1, tax map 46; thence in a northerly direction along the easterly lot line of lots 2.1, and 3, block 1, tax map 47 a distance of 185,0± feet to a point, said point being the northeasterly corner of lot 3, block 1, tax map 47; thence in a westerly� I and southerly direction along the northerly and westerly line of lot 3, block 1, tax map 47 a distance of 1035± feet to apoint, said p int being the northeasterly corner of lot 4, block 1, tax map 47; t ence in a south westerly direction along the northerly line of lot 4, block,1, tax map 47 a distance of 875± feet to a point, said point being the northwesterly corner of lot 4, block 1, tax map 47; thence in a southerly direction along the westerly line of lot 4, block 1, tax map .47 and across Old Hopewell, Road a distance of 435± feet to a point, aaid,point.being.on the southerly.right-of -way line of Old Z • .. i • Hopewell Road; thence in a westerly direction along the southerly right-of-way line of Old Hopewell Road a distance of 1420± feet to 'a point, said point being the southeasterly corner of lot 9, block 1, tax map 47; thence in a southwesterly direction along the southerly lot line of lots.9, 10, 11, block 1, tax map 47, across Cedar Hill Road to the Westerly right-of-way line of Cedar Hill Road a distance of 1210± feet t� a point, said point being the northeasterly corner of lot 76, block 1, tax map 62; thence in a southwesterly direction along the northerly line of lot 76, block 1, tax map 62 a distance of 3000± feet to apoint, said point being the southwesterly corner of lot 75, block 1, tax' map 62; thence in a northwesterly direction along the westerly .boundary line of lot 75, block 1, tax map 62, across Ada Drive, along the westerly boundary line of lots 41, 40,'39, 38, across Peter Drive, along 4 the westerly boundary line of lots 37 and'35, across Michael Drive, along the westerly boundary line of lots 34, 21, and 1, block 1, tax map 62, and across McFarland Road a distance of 3110= feet to a point, said point lying on.the westerly right-of-way of McFarland Road; theme along the westerly right-of-way of McFarland Road in a northerly direction a distance of.850± feet to a point, said point being the intersection of the westerly right-of-way of McFarland Road and the southerly right-of-way of Old Hopewell Road; thence in a northerly direction. across the intersection of Old Hopewell Road,' McFarland Road and Losee Road to the westerly right- of-way of Losee Road, along the westerly right-of-way of Losee Road 8 .L . to the intersection of the westerly right -of -way line of Losee Road and the southerly right-of-way line of Meyers Corner Road a • distance of 4800± feet; thence across Meyers Corner Road in a northerly direction to the northerly right-of-way line of Meyers Corner Road to a point, said point also being the intersection of Town Line of Town of Wappinger, the Village of Wappingers Falls, and the northerly right-of-way of Meyers Corner Road a distance pf 75± feet; thence in a northerly direction along the division line of the Village of Wappingers Falls and the Town of Wappinger a distance of 6350± feet to a point, said point lying on the divison line of the Town of Wappinger and the Village of Wappingers Falls, and on the southerly right-of-way line of New Hackensack Road; thence in a westerly and northerly direction along the division line pf the Village of Wappingers Falls and the Town of Wappinger a distance of 1160± feet to a point, said point lying on the division line between the Village of Wappingers Falls and the Town of Wappinger, and on the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway Route 9; thence in'a northerly direction along the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway Route 9 a distance of 3000± feet to a point, said point lying on the intersection of the westerly right-of-way line of State Highway Route 9 and the division line between the Town of Wappinger and the Town of Poughkeepsie; thence in a northeasterly direction along the division line between the Town of Wappinger and the Town of Poughkeepsie a distance of 21,360= feet to the point or place of beginning. w STATE OF NEW YORK !) ss.: COUNTY OF DUTCHESS1) I, ELAINE H. SNOWDEN, Town Clerk of theTown of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a special meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger duly and regularly called and held on the 20th day of February, 1969, at which a quorum was present and participated throughout, and that the same has not beeri in any manner rescinded or annulled and that the same is still in full force and effect and is duly entered in the minutes of said meeting. 1 further certify that all members of said board had due notice of said meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 'set my hand and the seal of the said Town of Wappinger this 21st day of February, 1969. SEAL \ • • Town Clerk WARRANT To Louii Diehl , Supervisor Town of wapp_inger , County of .Dutchess , New York. The following claims, having been presented to the Town Board of the Town of wapp l nger , and duly audited and allowed at a meeting thereof held on the 20th __day of Februo,-y , 19____69, in the amounts hereinafter respectively specified, and a certificate thereof having been duly filed in my office as Town Clerk, you are hereby authorized and directed to pay to each of the following claimants the amount allowed upon his claim as hereinafter stated: CLAIM No. NAME OF CLAIMANT 32 Sboer-Willen AMOUNT FUND OR ALLOWED ACCOUNT 1209 - / i 9P-2 1375.0C 1210- /F3"„--:-' 33 Amelia Crosby 59.25 1206 /306-10g 11' 4.10c, Hosp. Service 14D__AC 609 sa,qfp % 35 Francis Sherow 125.00 506 36 James T. Guarino ` 167. 901 37 Arthur Bisom 45. 707 38 Madlyn Marcojohn 77. 812 39 Gladys Timbo 52. 1208 40 Gladys Timbo 107.1 1208 41 Joseph Gutmann 32. 1409 604—\$c7a- 42 Rudolph E. Leper 750.01 1303 -7ao0 43 Robert Magdalany 3216.2 1312 .s, 44 Janet P. Williams 117.'' 812 45 Louis Diehl 78.0" 1208 46 Eleanor 8. Morton • 59.3 1208 47 G. Donald Finnan 77.8 1208 48 James Mills, Jr. 84.7 1208 49 Leonce L. Heady 91.2_ 1208 50 William J. Bulger 74.7 1206 51 Elaine H. Snowden 71.1' 1208 611_ 52 Allan E. Rappleyea 500.x. 1308 - 608- fl s`f "-% 53 The Beasley Agency, Inc. 7261. • 8 1305- 310'7 °J 54 7.4/1)t -t376 Gori mcg- ni hr 300. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and the Seal of the Town of Wapp inger , this 20th day of Febr4irY , 19 69 1206 OTHER INFORMATION -SEAL] Town Clerk , 6upervisor Town of Wapp$nger , County of Dutchess New York. The following claims, having been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Wappinger , and duly audited and allowed at a meeting thereof held on the WARRANT To Lou_ie.Diettl , Supervisor Town of •Wapp4nge County of Dutchess , New York. The following claims, having been presented to the Town Board of the Town of Rappinger , and duly audited and allowed at a meeting thereof held on the ___Xthday of FOrtiOng , 19..69_, in the amounts hereinafter respectively specified, and a certificate thereof having been duly filed in my office as Town Clerk, you are hereby authorized and directed to pay to each of the following claimants the amount allowed upon his claim as hereinafter stated: CLAIM No. NAME OF CLAIMANT 78 Popper Electric Co. 79 Dept. of Water Supply 5.81 508 AMOUNT FUND OR ALLOWED ACCOUNT 8.10 508 80 Edward Thompson Co. Painofs Service Stat. 21.00 710 9.60 1409 81 1307 82 W. & S. D. News ' 84.00 83 84 Chester Satz Co., Inc. 85 610— 16.40 ' 81.48 1307— 65.10 87 88 89 91 92 93 Pitney Bowes Inc. 94 Martin Leekow 95 David Battistoni re The Pendell Press Eggleston Office Equip. Xerox Corp. 2.25 509 4.18 509 710, 808, 811 329.15 704, 707 2.25 127.81 77.00 Hudson Valley Blue Prt. 3 Central Hudson • 33 Mark Brandon 98 Mark Brandon 99 Neil Bron 100 9, IS OTHER INFORMATION 8 West Main St. Wappingers Falls, N.Y. 170 Old Country Rd., Mineola Mosier Ave. 41 Rte. 9 53 Market St., Poughkeepsie 41 New Market St. 509 Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 25.00 P.O. Box 2487 509-102.81 Church St. Stat., N.Y.,M.Y. 505— 25.00 507— 52.00 1402-284.53 p03— 28.80 910 11 1.1 506 • 18.2 505 73.6 1208 ' 16. 1009 1009 1009 009 1009 1009 29 Academy St. Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 69 Walnut St. Stamford, Conn., 06904 13 Mack Road, Poughkeepsie 19 Orchard Dr. Wappingers Fal Is 90 se In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and the Seal of the Town of this.:.day of (SEAL] , 19 00 Town Clerk WARRANT To Louis Diehl , Supervisor Town of %MAW , County of Dutchass , New York. The following claims, having been presented to the Town Board of the Town of , and duly audited and allowed at a meeting thereof held on the !Igor 20th -s --nay of February , 19.69. . , in the amounts hereinafter respectively specified, and a certificate thereof having been duly filed in my office as Town Clerk, you are hereby authorized and directed to pay to each of the following claimants the amount allowed upon his claim as hereinafter stated: CLAIM No. NAME OF CLAIMANT 101 Gerald Travis 102 103 Tcm Burruss 104 105 Richard Schultz 106 Granduoy 107 Joan Vick 108 Sandy Bernstein 109 Hank Boldrin 110 Monty Koehler AMOUNT FUND OR ALLOWED ACCOUNT OTHER INFORMATION 33 Downey Ave. 4.00 1009 Wappingers Fall*, N.Y. • 4.00 1009 • 4.00 1009 • 4.00 1009 16.00 '29.04 • 2.00 1009 5 Map!, St. W.F. of 7 Meadow Lane 1009 Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 1008 Rte. 9, imperial Plaza Wappingers Trailer Pk. New Hackensack Rd., WF 52 Whittier Blvd. Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 60 Hickory Lane Wappingers Falls zi rem* Lane Poughkeepsie, N.Y. 2 Lexington Ave. Poughkeepsie, N.Y. • 16.00 • 24.00 , 16.00 1009 1009 1009 111 William Eckhoff -16.00 1009 112 Chester Panek 16.00 1009 113 Frank V. DiCorcia . 725.00 1002 114 Helen's Lawn Service 62.50 ' 1002 115 Beatrice W. Balyer ' 70.00 1001 116 Francis P. Dunlap • its.on 1003 117 N.Y. State Fedisig ff. ng 118 Axton Cross Co. 119 Central Hudson 120 so 121 N. 6. S. Supply Corp. 122 Central Hudson 70.00 13.20 1509 135.08 1509 197.41 1510 24 South White St. Poughkeepsie, N.Y. MacFarlane Rd. W.F. R. D. 16, Hopewell Rd. Rte. 9, Fishkill, N.Y. Room 305 1411 488 Broadway, Albany, N.Y. 12207 36.00 1511 266.80 1511 Notate 9 Fishkill, N.Y. in Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and the Seal of the Town of this - day of , 19 [SEAL] �Jj Town Clerk